High-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma post abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and pelvic irradiation: Technique and experience

PurposeTreatment options are limited for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic irradiation. We have previously reported on the successful utility of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy salvage for prostate cancer failing definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In this report, we describe our technique and early experience with definitive HDR brachytherapy in patients post APR and pelvic EBRT.Patients and MethodsSix men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer had a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT. Sixteen to 18 HDR catheters were placed transperineally under transperineal ultrasound–guidance. The critical first two catheters were placed freehand posterior to the inferior rami on both sides of the bulbar urethra under cystoscopic visualization. A template was used for subsequent catheter placement. Using CT-based planning, 5 men received 36 Gy in six fractions as monotherapy. One patient initially treated with EBRT to 30 Gy, received 24 Gy in four fractions.ResultsMedian age was 67.5 (56–74) years. At a median followup of 26 (14–60) months, all patients are alive and with no evidence of disease per the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure, with a median prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.19 ng/mL. Three men have reported grade 2 late genitourinary toxicity. There has been no report of grade 3–5 toxicity.ConclusionTransperineal ultrasound–guided HDR brachytherapy using the above technique should be considered as definitive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT.     

The equivalent dose contribution from high-dose-rate brachytherapy to positive pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer

PurposeDefinitive radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer involves external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. There remains controversy and practice pattern variation regarding the optimal radiation dose to metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (LNs). This study investigates the contribution of the pelvic LN dose from HDR brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsFor 17 patients with 36 positive pelvic LNs, each LN was contoured on a computed tomography (CT) plan for EBRT and on brachytherapy planning CTs using positron emission tomographic images obtained before chemoradiation. The mean delivered dose from each plan was recorded, and an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated. A Student's t test was performed to determine if the mean delivered dose is significantly different from the mean prescribed dose and EQD2.ResultsThe average prescribed dose from the total EBRT was 54.09 Gy. The average prescribed HDR dose to International Commission on Radiation Units point A was 26.81 Gy. The average doses delivered to the involved LNs from EBRT and brachytherapy were 54.25 and 4.31 Gy, respectively, with the corresponding EQD2 of 53.45 and 4.00 Gy. There was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the mean delivered and the prescribed doses for EBRT and between the delivered dose and the EQD2 for EBRT and brachytherapy.ConclusionsOur study shows that the HDR contribution is 7% (4.00 Gy) of the total EQD2 (57.45 Gy). The HDR contribution should be accounted for when prescribing the EBRT boost dose to pelvic LNs for the optimal therapeutic dose.     

Feasibility and Early Results of Interstitial Intensity-Modulated HDR/PDR Brachytherapy (IMBT) with/without Complementary External-Beam Radiotherapy and Extended Surgery in Recurrent Pelvic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: A new multimodality treatment concept consisting of extended resection and postoperative fractionated intensity-modulated interstitial brachytherapy (IMBT) was introduced for pelvic recurrence of colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 46 patients received extended resection and single plastic tubes were sutured directly onto the tumor bed. IMBT was started within 2 weeks postoperatively with a median dose of 24.5 Gy (5-35 Gy). Patients were treated either with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR; n = 23) or with pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR; n = 23). 25 patients received complementary 45-Gy external-beam irradiation (EBRT) to the pelvic region after explanting the plastic tubes. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20.6 months (7-107 months) and mean patient survival 25.7 +/- 25.8 months (median 17, range 1-107 months). After 5 years overall survival, disease-free survival and local control rate were 23%, 20% and 33%, significantly influenced by the resectional state. There was a trend in favor of PDR compared to HDR, which reached statistical significance in patients who had not received additional EBRT. CONCLUSION: The combination of extended surgery and postoperative interstitial IMBT is feasible and offers effective interdisciplinary treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer. In this small and inhomogeneous cohort of patients PDR seems to be more effective than HDR, particularly when application of complementary EBRT is not possible. None of the patients who required resection of distant metastasis survived > 2 years in this study.     

Low-Dose-Rate versus High-Dose-Rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer - Final Results of a Phase III randomized trial

PURPOSEIntracavitary brachytherapy using High-Dose-Rate (HDR) and Low-dose-rate (LDR) in cervical cancer has been utilized. We report the long-term final results of a large randomized trial in terms of toxicities and efficacy.METHODS AND MATERIALSBetween 1996 to 2005, 816 patients were randomized to LDR (n = 441 patients) or HDR brachytherapy (n = 369 patients) stratified by FIGO Stage grouping. Patients with Stage I-II received external irradiation of 40 Gy in 20 fractions (with midline block (MLB)) followed by either 2 LDR Intracavitary applications of 30 Gy to point A (2–3 weeks apart) or 5 HDR Intracavitary applications of 7 Gy to point A once weekly. Patients with Stage III received 50 Gy in 25 fractions (with MLB after 40 Gy) followed by either one application of LDR 30 Gy to point A or three applications of HDR 7 Gy to point A once weekly.RESULTSWith a median follow-up was 64 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 21 - 111), moderate to severe rectal and bladder complications were higher in LDR arm as compared to HDR arm (9.7% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.02) and (10.5% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.06) for Stage I-II. No difference in rectal or bladder complications for Stage III patients. Disease free and overall survivals were similar in both the arms for all stages.CONCLUSIONSHDR intracavitary brachytherapy with 7 Gy per fraction weekly is superior to LDR in terms of late rectal and bladder complications. Local control rates and survivals are similar irrespective of stages.     

Long term outcomes of Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa treated with High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term local control, overall survival and toxicity in Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy.METHODS AND MATERIALS: This analysis included patients diagnosed as Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa on biopsy and treated with radical brachytherapy or External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by brachytherapy boost. All patients received High dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy. The total dose was 35 Gy in ten fractions for brachytherapy alone. Patients who received EBRT (50–54 Gy) were boosted by brachytherapy to a dose of 18–24 Gy in 6–8 fractions. All patients were treated using CT based planning.RESULTS: Between 2007 to 2017, a total of 24 patients of Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa received HDR interstitial brachytherapy either alone or as a boost. Majority of the patients were tobacco chewers (80%). 17(71%) patients were clinical stage T2N0M0 and 7(29%) were clinically T1N0M0. At a median follow up of 7 years (3–12 years), the local control rate was 100% in stage I and 88% in stage II. The 5 year overall survival rate was 80%. Two patients developed nodal recurrence and one patient developed distant metastasis within two years of treatment. Tumor size and brachytherapy technique (radical vs. boost) did not impact local control or overall survival (p > 0.05). Majority of the acute toxicities were Grade 1 and 2. One patient developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible.CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage Buccal Mucosa cancer either alone or as a boost provides excellent long term local control and overall survival. The acute and late toxicities are acceptable with majority of the patients presenting with Grade 1 or 2 toxicity.     

Do vaginal recurrence rates differ among adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy regimens in early-stage endometrial cancer?

PurposeWe sought to retrospectively examine clinical outcomes for three adjuvant vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimens after hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer.MethodsIncluded were women of all ages from two independent hospital systems diagnosed with Stage I-II endometrial cancer of any grade between 2000 and 2016 who underwent hysterectomy followed by adjuvant vaginal cylinder HDR brachytherapy with either 7.0 Gy × 3 fractions prescribed to 0.5 cm vaginal depth, 6.5 Gy × 3 fractions prescribed to 0.5 cm vaginal depth, or 6.0 Gy × 5 fractions prescribed to the vaginal surface. Outcomes included vaginal recurrence (VR), pelvic recurrence, distant recurrence, locoregional recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.ResultsOf the 348 women, 45 (13%) received 7.0 Gy × 3 fractions, 259 (74%) received 6.5 Gy × 3 fractions, and 44 (13%) received 6.0 Gy × 5 fractions. Women receiving 5-fraction brachytherapy were more likely to be younger with a higher performance status. At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, VR rates were 2.2%, 0.8%, and 4.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in the risks for VR among brachytherapy regimens. Risks for VR, pelvic recurrence, distant recurrence, locoregional recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival did not differ between propensity score–matched five- and 3-fraction brachytherapy cohorts.ConclusionsVR rates after hysterectomy and adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer were low and not significantly different by HDR dose fractionation.     

Designing equivalent treatment regimens for prostate radiotherapy based on equivalent uniform dose

The purpose of this work was to determine alternative radiotherapy (RT) regimens that are biologically equivalent to clinically proven treatments using different RT modalities or different fractionation schemes. The concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) is used with the linear quadratic model to determine equivalent treatment regimens using two representative sets of parameters derived from clinical data: (i) alpha/beta = 3.1 Gy and alpha = 0.15 Gy(-1), and (ii) alpha/beta = 1.5 Gy and alpha = 0.04 Gy(-1). The EUD values for the critical structure (rectum) are also calculated. Representative dose volume histograms were used to account for dose inhomogeneities for different RT modalities. A series of alternative and equivalent fractionation regimens that can be used with different radiotherapy modalities for localized prostate cancer were determined. For example, the alternative regimens, calculated with the alpha/beta ratio of 3.1 Gy, that would be biologically equivalent to external beam RT (EBRT) of 76 Gy (38x2.0 Gy) include: EBRT hypofractionation of 21x3.0 Gy; I-125 implant of 156 Gy; Pd-103 implant of 128 Gy; high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of 4x10.5 Gy; I-125 implant of 65 Gy combined with EBRT of 23x2.0 Gy; and HDR brachytherapy of 3x5.9 Gy combined with EBRT of 23x2.0 Gy. Similar data for other parameters are also presented. With caution, the data presented may be useful in designing clinical trials to explore new RT strategies, such as image-guided intensity-modulated RT.     

Image-guided brachytherapy following external-beam radiation therapy for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer

ObjectiveTo investigate the outcomes of definitive external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) unsuitable for surgery.MethodsA total of 50 patients with inoperable EC were included. The patients received EBRT in a median dose of 45 Gy to the pelvis over 5 weeks. Thereafter, the patients received brachytherapy using tandem and ovoid applicators. High-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and gross tumor volume in brachytherapy (GTVp) were defined by the assistance of patients’ pre-IGBT magnetic resonance imaging.ResultsThe medical records of the 50 patients were analyzed. The main causes of inoperability were anesthesia contraindications, namely medical comorbidities and obesity. The median cumulative D90s (the minimum dose delivered to 90% of the volume) in EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions) to the HR-CTV and GTVp were 72.9 Gy10 (range, 64.9 to 80.3) and 166.2 Gy10 (range, 123.0 to 189.8), respectively. Over a median follow-up period of 27 months, 8 of the patients died of cancer. The 2-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates were 75% and 83%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of pelvic and distant failure were 4% (n = 2) and 16% (n = 8), respectively. Gastrointestinal complications of grade 2 or above were noted in 2 patients (4%), and a grade 2 genitourinary complication was noted in one.ConclusionsFor patients with inoperable EC, EBRT followed by IGBT is an effective approach for achieving high local control without a high risk of complications.     

CT-based image-guided brachytherapy in uterine cervical cancer: Effect of tumor dose and volume on local control

Background and PurposeTo determine the optimal primary tumor dose for cervical cancer treatment using computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 171 patients with cervical cancer who underwent both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and IGBT between May 2015 and December 2019. Majority of EBRT plan included central shielding technique. CT-based IGBT was performed weekly a median of three times. Magnetic resonance imaging preceded the first and third session of IGBT for target delineation.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 64 years (range: 30–91 years). The median follow-up time for living patients was 43 months (range: 6–76 months). The 3-year local control rates according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2008) stages were 89%, 100%, 92%, 89%, 78%, and 100% for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA, respectively. The median EBRT dose to the central pelvis and parametrium/pelvic wall was 41.4 Gy and 50.4 Gy, respectively. Patients who received a cumulative 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) (α/β = 10 Gy) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) D90% ≥ 75 Gy achieved a long-term local control rate of 93%, compared with 80% in those who received <75 Gy (p = 0.02).ConclusionThis is one of the largest CT-based IGBT series examining the treatment of cervical cancer based on the tumor dose-volume relationship. An HR CTV D90% ≥75 Gy was significantly associated with favorable local control in this study.     

Association of Brachytherapy Boost with Overall Survival for Gleason 9-10 Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Primary versus Secondary Pattern 5

PURPOSEThe addition of a brachytherapy (BT) boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) reduces recurrence risk in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and may reduce PCa-mortality for Gleason grade group 5 (GG5). Whether the extent of pattern five, a risk factor for distant metastases, impacts the benefit of a BT boost is unclear.METHODSMen with localized GG5 PCa treated with (1) EBRT or (2) EBRT+BT between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. EBRT monotherapy group received conventionally fractionated (1.8−2.0 Gy per fraction) ≥74 Gy or moderately hypofractionated (2.5−3.0 Gy per fraction) ≥60 Gy. EBRT + BT group received conventionally fractionated ≥45 Gy or moderately hypofractionated ≥37.5 Gy, and either LDR or HDR BT. All patients received concomitant ADT; none received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or surgery. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards in the overall cohort, followed by subgroups based on primary versus secondary pattern 5. Propensity score- and exact-matching was used to corroborate results.RESULTSA total of 8260 men were eligible: EBRT alone (89%) versus EBRT + BT (11%). 5-year OS for EBRT versus EBRT + BT was 76.3% and 85.0%, respectively (p = 0.002; multivariable adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65−0.98; p = 0.04). These results remained consistent after propensity score and exact matching. The OS advantage of a BT boost was more prominent in men with Gleason 4 + 5 PCa (p = 0.001) and not observed in men with Gleason 5 + 5 or 5 + 4 PCa.CONCLUSIONSExtent of pattern five may be useful in appropriately selecting men for EBRT+BT and should be considered as a pre-randomization stratification variable for future clinical trial design.     

Identifying disparities in brachytherapy delivery for locally advanced cervical cancer

IntroductionThe standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost. Some studies show a decreased usage of brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients despite the standard of care and known survival advantage. This study aims to characterize the utilization of brachytherapy in Oregon and identify where disparities in treatment may exist.MethodsThe Oregon State Cancer Registry database was used to identify patients diagnosed with FIGO Stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer between 2007 and 2016. Patients who received initial EBRT were categorized by whether they received brachytherapy boost or not. Age at diagnosis, county of patient residence, rural-urban status of the county, race/ethnicity, and insurance payer were studied using multivariable logistic regression to identify possible underserved populations. Survival data was compared using a Cox proportional hazard survival model.Results401 patients who received primary EBRT for FIGO stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer were identified in the 10-year span. Breakdown by stage is: 16% stage IB2, 23.9% stage II, 37.4% stage III, and 22.7% stage IV. Of those, 154 (38.4%) received brachytherapy boost treatment, 75 (18.7%) received a different boost modality, and 42.9% received no boost. Stage IV (p = 0.001) and uninsured patients (p = 0.04) were significantly less likely to receive brachytherapy. Older age was also associated with decreased brachytherapy usage, as each additional year of life decreased brachytherapy receipt by 1.8% (p = 0.04). Native American and Pacific Islander patients were the only group significantly more likely to receive brachytherapy (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the rate of brachytherapy boost identified based on urban/rural status of the county (p = 0.63 to 0.69), other racial/ethnic categories (p = 0.66 to 0.80), or among the other stages (p=0.45 to 0.63). In Cox proportional hazard survival analysis, patients that received brachytherapy showed a 42% reduction in risk of cancer specific mortality, though this did not reach the predetermined level of statistical significance (p = 0.057).ConclusionsThe brachytherapy boost rate among locally advanced cervical cancer patients was 38.4%. The data also indicated a likely reduction in cancer specific mortality in patients receiving brachytherapy. Older patients, stage IV patients, and uninsured patients were less likely to receive brachytherapy. Given the low overall brachytherapy usage, these data indicate access and delivery of brachytherapy care needs to be improved across the state. The increased brachytherapy use in the American Indian and Pacific Islander patient population should be further studied to identify facilitators to treatment completion and potentially extrapolate to other groups.     

Intraoperative and percutaneous iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy for previously irradiated lesions of the spine

PurposeAdvances in stereotactic radiosurgery have improved local control of spine metastases, but local failure is still a problem and repeat irradiation is limited by normal tissue tolerance. A novel high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy technique has been developed to treat these previously irradiated lesions.Methods and MaterialsFive patients with progressive disease at previously irradiated sites in the spine who were not amenable to further external beam radiation were treated. Catheters were placed intraoperatively in 2 patients and percutaneously implanted in 3 patients with image-guided techniques. Conformal plans were generated to deliver dose to target tissues and spare critical structures. Patients received single-fraction treatment using HDR iridium-192 brachytherapy.ResultsMedian dose was 14 Gy (range, 12–18 Gy) with a median gross total volume D₉₀ of 75% (range, 31–94%); spinal cord/cauda equina dose constraints were met. At a median followup of 9 months, no local progression of disease has been observed. Four patients had reduction in pain 1–4 weeks after treatment. No brachytherapy-related complications have been observed.ConclusionsIntraoperative and percutaneous iridium-192 HDR spine brachytherapy techniques were not associated with complications or acute toxicity. There has been no local progression at treated sites, and most patients experienced reduction in cancer-related pain.     

Can we reduce dose to ureters as avoidance organs for MRI based brachytherapy for cervical cancer? A dosimetric feasibility study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEUreteral stenosis (US) is an underreported complication of brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer (CC), with limited data on toxicity risk reduction. A previous study demonstrated ureter EQD2 D0.1cc > 77 Gy correlated with US development. We sought to assess feasibility of this constraint while maintaining similar HR-CTV coverage.MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients with locally advanced CC treated with EBRT plus HDR MRI-based brachytherapy boost without hydronephrosis at diagnosis and with ureter dose EQD2 D0.1cc > 77 Gy were included. Replan was attempted to achieve HR-CTV D90 ≥ 80–85 Gy and ureter dose reduction. Ureter distance from lateral margin of HR-CTV and tandem was recorded. t-test was performed to compare ureteral dose and HR-CTV D90.RESULTsOf 25 patients were identified. Hundred percent received 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvis ± paraaortic lymph nodes and 80% receiving median additional parametrial dose of 5.4 Gy. Replan meeting ureteral dose of ≤77 Gy was feasible in 18 of 25 patients, with a reduction in median ureter D0.1cc from 82.3 to 76.8 Gy (p < 0.001). Median HR-CTV D90 was similar (84.7 vs. 85.0 Gy). Replan achieved D0.1cc ≤77 Gy in 56% of patients who experienced US. All unilateral US cases occurred in the ureter closest to HR-CTV.CONCLUSIONSOptimization to reduce ureter dose to ≤77 Gy is feasible when ureters are visible and contoured. Ureters may be considered as potential OAR during MRI-based brachytherapy treatment. Reduced ring to tandem total reference air kerma (TRAK) ratio may provide an additional metric by which to lower US risk.     

Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer

PurposeTo report prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival and treatment-related toxicity outcomes after combining high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsBetween 1998 and 2009, 229 patients were treated with HDR brachytherapy followed 3 weeks later by supplemental EBRT. The HDR brachytherapy boost consisted of three fractions of ¹⁹²Ir (5.5–7.5 Gy per fraction), and EBRT consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivering an additional 45.0–50.4 Gy directed to the prostate gland and seminal vesicles. Median follow-up was 61 months.ResultsSeven-year PSA relapse-free survival for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 95%, 90%, and 57%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among high-risk patients treated with biological equivalent doses in excess of 190 Gy, 7-year PSA relapse-free survival was 81%. In multivariate analysis, Gleason scores of ≥8 predicted for increased risk of biochemical failure, whereas the use of short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy did not influence tumor-control outcomes even among intermediate- or high-risk patients. Seven-year incidence of distant metastases for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 5%, 3%, and 17%, respectively. Seven-year incidence of late Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicities were 22.1% and 4.9%, respectively and the 7-year incidence of Grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were 1% and 0.4%, respectively.ConclusionHDR prostate brachytherapy in conjunction with supplemental EBRT results in excellent biochemical relapse-free survival rates with a low incidence of severe late genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities. The use of short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did not influence long-term biochemical tumor control in this cohort.     

Locally advanced cervical cancer in renal transplant patients: A dilemma between control and toxicity

PurposeTreatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in patients with a renal graft requires precautions. The graft is usually in a pelvic position, close to the clinical target volume (CTV). Preserving the graft while ensuring local control is a challenge we have faced in two occasions. We report our experience.Methods and MaterialsWe report the cases of 2 patients treated at our institution with a modified workup and therapeutic approach compared with our standard approach. The clinical and technical aspects of both treatments were systematically reviewed and contrasted with reports previously cited in the literature.ResultsThe first patient received external beam conformal radiotherapy (total dose: 30 Gy in the pelvis) followed by two sessions of MRI-guided brachytherapy (2 × 15 Gy to 90% of the intermediate risk CTV). The second one received pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (total dose: 45 Gy) followed by MRI-guided brachytherapy delivering 15 Gy to 90% of the intermediate risk CTV. Both patients had a complete response and were still in remission more than 2 years after treatment while retaining their graft. No severe late toxicity was reported.ConclusionsExternal beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy is feasible in locally advanced cervical cancer, despite the presence of a kidney graft near the targets. Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy allowed an accurate evaluation of the dose distribution, reaching the recommended treatment thresholds with optimal protection of the graft.     

Comparison between In Vivo Dosimetry and Barium Contrast Technique for Prediction of Rectal Complications in High-Dose-Rate Intracavitary Radiotherapy in Cervix Cancer Patients

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between late rectal complications and rectal dose in cervix cancer patients treated with high-dose-rate intracavitary radiotherapy (HDR ICR) and to analyze factors reducing rectal complications. Patients and Methods: A total of 136 patients with cervix cancer who were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and HDR ICR from 1995 to 1999 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy (RT) consisted of EBRT plus HDR ICR. The median EBRT dose was 50.4 Gy, and midline block was done after 30-50 Gy of EBRT. A total of six fractions of HDR ICR with 4 Gy fraction size each were applied twice per week to the A point. The rectal dose was calculated at the rectal reference point using the barium contrast criteria. In vivo measurement of the rectal dose was performed with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) during HDR ICR. The median follow-up period was 26 months (range 6-60 months). Results: A total of 16 patients (12%) experienced rectal bleeding, which occurred 4-33 months (median 11 months) after the completion of RT. The calculated rectal doses did not differ in patients with rectal bleeding and those without, but the measured rectal doses were higher in affected patients. The differences of the measured ICR fractional rectal dose, ICR total rectal dose, and total rectal biologically equivalent dose (BED) were statistically significant. When the measured ICR total rectal dose exceeded 16 Gy, the ratio of the measured rectal dose to A point dose was > 70%; when the measured rectal BED exceeded 110 Gy₃, a high possibility of late rectal complications could be found. Conclusion: In vivo dosimetry using TLD during HDR ICR was a good predictor of late rectal complications. Hence, if data from in vivo dosimetry shows any possibility of rectal bleeding, efforts should be made to reduce the rectal dose. Ziel: Untersuchung der Korrelation zwischen Spätnebenwirkungen am Rektum und der rektalen Dosis bei Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom, die mit intrakavitärer Brachytherapie (HDR-ICR) behandelt wurden, sowie Analyse der Faktoren, die rektale Komplikationen reduzieren. Patienten und Methodik: Es wurde eine retrospektive Analyse von insgesamt 136 Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom durchgeführt, die im Zeitraum von 1995 bis 1999 mit perkutaner Strahlentherapie (EBRT) and HDR-ICR behandelt wurden. Die mittlere externe Dosis betrug 50,4 Gy, wobei ein Mittellinienblock nach 30-50 Gy der EBRT eingesetzt wurde. Die insgesamt sechs Fraktionen der HDR-ICR wurden zweimal pro Woche mit jeweils 4 Gy am Punkt A appliziert. Die rektale Dosis wurde unter Verwendung der Bariumkontrastkriterien am rektalen Referenzpunkt berechnet. In-vivo-Messungen der rektalen Dosis erfolgten mit Hilfe eines Thermolumineszenzdosimeters (TLD) während der HDR-ICR. Der mittlere Nachsorgezeitraum betrug 26 Monate (6-60 Monate). Ergebnisse: Insgesamt 16 Patientinnen (12%) klagten über rektale Blutungen, die innerhalb von 4-33 Monaten (im Mittel 11 Monate) nach Abschluss der RT auftraten. Die berechnete rektale Dosis unterschied sich nicht zwischen Patientinnen mit und ohne rektale Blutungen, jedoch waren die gemessenen rektalen Dosen bei den betroffenen Patientinnen höher. Die Unterschiede zwischen der gemessenen Einzeldosis am Rektum, der Gesamtdosis am Rektum und der biologisch äquivalenten Gesamtdosis (BED) am Rektum waren statistisch signifikant. Überschritt die gemessene Gesamtdosis der Brachytherapie 16 Gy, betrug das Verhältnis von gemessener rektaler Dosis zur Dosis am A-Punkt > 70%. Bei einer gemessenen BED > 110 Gy₃ bestand eine hohe Wahrscheinlichkeit für späte rektale Nebenwirkungen. Schlussfolgerung: Die In-vivo-Dosimetrie mit TLD hat sich als guter Prädiktor von Spätnebenwirkungen am Rektum erwiesen. Falls In-vivo-Dosimetriewerte ein Risiko späterer Proktitis anzeigen, sollte die Rektumdosis reduziert werden.     

Risk factors for urethral stricture following external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeA potential late side effect of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is urethral stricture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dosimetric parameters possibly contributing to stricture development, including dose to bladder base and D2cc(Gy) within 10 mm of prostatic urethra (D2cc _10 mm), which has, so far, not been reported in the literature.Methods and MaterialsPatients developing urethral stricture, and matched controls, were identified from a prospective database of those receiving 46 Gy in 23 fractions of EBRT, followed by a single 15 Gy HDR brachytherapy dose. Patients had locally advanced, high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy treatment planning parameters (planning target volume (PTV) size (cm ³), V110(%) _{bladder base}, D2cc _10mm, number of HDR catheters, number of source dwell positions, and total source dwell time within 10 mm of the prostatic urethra) were analyzed to determine potential risk factors for urethral stricture.ResultsSeventy-two patients were treated, 22 of whom developed a urethral stricture. Univariate logistic regression performed on the planning parameters identified increased PTV size and D2cc _10 mm, with decreased V110(%) _{bladder base} as risk factors for stricture formation.ConclusionsIt is suggested that PTV size, V110(%) _{bladder base}, and D2cc _10mm are predictive of urethral stricture formation following EBRT and brachytherapy to the prostate. This study demonstrates the importance of minimizing high dwell times and hot spots close to organs at risk and also the correction of any craniocaudal movement of catheters to avoid potential hot spots in the bulbomembranous urethra where there may be increased dose sensitivity.     

Early outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with ultra-hypofractionated radiation in higher-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSEThis study evaluated outcomes associated with a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with higher-risk localized prostate cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe identified 101 patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk, unfavorable intermediate-risk, or favorable intermediate-risk with probable extra-prostatic extension treated with HDR brachytherapy (15 Gy x 1 fraction) followed by SBRT (5 Gy x 5 daily fractions to the prostate and/or seminal vesicles and/or pelvic lymph nodes). Androgen deprivation therapy was used in 55.4% of all patients (90% of high-risk, 33% of intermediate-risk). Toxicities according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 and International Prostate Symptom Scores were prospectively documented at each followup visit. Biochemical relapse was defined as PSA nadir +2ng/mL.RESULTSThe median follow-up time after SBRT was 24.1 months. No grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. The incidence of acute and late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicities was both 0.99%. Acute and late grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed in 5.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Median time to a grade 2 GU toxicity was 6 months with a 14% 2-year actuarial rate of grade 2 GU toxicity. Median International Prostate Symptom Scores at 24 months was not significantly different than baseline (6 vs. 5; p = 0.24). Inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and absence of a rectal spacer were significantly associated with more frequent grade ≥1 GU toxicity, but not grade ≥2 GU or gastrointestinal toxicity. The 2-year biochemical relapse free survival was 97%.CONCLUSIONSHDR brachytherapy combined with SBRT was associated with a favorable early toxicity profile and encouraging cancer control outcomes.