Long-term outcome for prostate cancer using pseudo pulse–dosed rate brachytherapy,external beam radiotherapy,and hormones

PurposeWe report the long-term outcomes of pulse-dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy used in a nonstandard style (pseudo-PDR) with an high-dose rate brachytherapy technique in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and hormonal manipulation on prostate cancer (PC).Methods and MaterialsWe treated 253 patients with Stage T1–T3 N0M0 PC, between December 1999 and March 2006. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for a median 6 months. Treatment consisted of three pulses of pseudo-PDR brachytherapy to a median dose of 18 Gy with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions of EBRT.ResultsAt a median 6 years followup, (range, 1–11 years), 5-year overall survival was 92%, and PC-specific survival was 96%. The 5-year biochemical control (biochemical no evidence of disease) by the Phoenix definition for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 95%, 90%, and 71%, respectively (p < 0.00001). At 6 years, the incidence of Radiotherapy Oncology Group Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity was 1% and 6%; Radiotherapy Oncology Group Grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was 4% and 0%. Erectile preservation at 3 years was 58%. The Phoenix definition best predicted clinical failure with a high specificity (94%).ConclusionsPseudo-PDR brachytherapy plus EBRT with limited neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation is an effective treatment option in localized PC, with minimal and tolerable morbidity and provides excellent control. This technique of a modified PDR-delivery technique appears as effective as high-dose rate therapy.     

Efficacy of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in patients with oral tongue carcinoma

PurposeTo evaluate the results of high-dose-rate (HDR)-interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in oral tongue carcinomas.Methods and MaterialsBetween September 1999 and August 2007, 50 patients were treated for oral tongue carcinoma with HDR-ISBT. The patient's mean age was 58 years. Forty-two patients were in T1–2 stage and 8 patients were in T3 stage; 16 patients were in N+ stage and 34 patients in N0 stage. Exclusive ISBT was given to 17 patients (34%) in T1–2 N0 stage and complementary to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to 33 patients (66%). A perioperative technique was performed on 14 patients. The median total dose was 44 Gy when HDR was used alone (4 Gy per fraction) and 18 Gy when complementary to 50 Gy EBRT (3 Gy per fraction).ResultsThe median followup was 44 months. Actuarial disease-free survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 74%, respectively. Local failure developed in 7 patients. Actuarial local control (LC) rates were 87% and 79% at 3 and 5 years in T1–2 stage 94.5% and 91% and T3 stage 43% and 43% (with salvage surgery). Exclusive HDR cases showed LC in 100% of the cases, and the combined group (EBRT + HDR) showed LC in 80% and 69% of the cases at 3 and 5 years (p = 0.044). Soft-tissue necrosis developed in 16% and bone necrosis in 4% of the cases.ConclusionsHDR brachytherapy is an effective method for the treatment of oral tongue carcinoma in low-risk cases. Doses per fraction between 3 and 4 Gy yield LC and complication rates similar to low-dose rate. The perioperative technique promises encouraging results.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma post abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and pelvic irradiation: Technique and experience

PurposeTreatment options are limited for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic irradiation. We have previously reported on the successful utility of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy salvage for prostate cancer failing definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In this report, we describe our technique and early experience with definitive HDR brachytherapy in patients post APR and pelvic EBRT.Patients and MethodsSix men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer had a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT. Sixteen to 18 HDR catheters were placed transperineally under transperineal ultrasound–guidance. The critical first two catheters were placed freehand posterior to the inferior rami on both sides of the bulbar urethra under cystoscopic visualization. A template was used for subsequent catheter placement. Using CT-based planning, 5 men received 36 Gy in six fractions as monotherapy. One patient initially treated with EBRT to 30 Gy, received 24 Gy in four fractions.ResultsMedian age was 67.5 (56–74) years. At a median followup of 26 (14–60) months, all patients are alive and with no evidence of disease per the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure, with a median prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.19 ng/mL. Three men have reported grade 2 late genitourinary toxicity. There has been no report of grade 3–5 toxicity.ConclusionTransperineal ultrasound–guided HDR brachytherapy using the above technique should be considered as definitive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT.     

Brachytherapy provides comparable outcomes and improved cost-effectiveness in the treatment of low/intermediate prostate cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness and outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with low/intermediate risk of prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsOne thousand three hundred twenty-eight patients with low or intermediate risk of prostate cancer were treated with LDR (n = 207), HDR with four fractions (n = 252), or IMRT (n = 869) between January 1992 and December 2008. LDR patients were treated with palladium seeds to a median dose of 120 Gy, whereas HDR patients were treated to a median dose 38.0 Gy (four fractions). IMRT patients received 42–44 fractions with a median dose of 75.6 Gy. Clinical outcomes were compared, including biochemical failure, cause-specific survival, and overall survival.ResultsOverall, no differences in 5-year biochemical control (BC) or cause-specific survival were noted among treatment modalities. The calculated reimbursement for LDR brachytherapy, HDR brachytherapy with four fractions, and IMRT was $9,938; $17,514; and $29,356, respectively. HDR and LDR brachytherapy were statistically less costly to Medicare and the institution than IMRT (p < 0.001), and LDR brachytherapy was less costly than HDR brachytherapy (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cost to Medicare for BC with IMRT were $4045 and $2754 per percent of BC for LDR and HDR brachytherapy, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using institutional cost comparing IMRT with LDR and HDR brachytherapy was $4962 and $4824 per 1% improvement in BC.ConclusionsIn this study of patients with low and intermediate risk of prostate cancer, comparable outcomes at 5 years were noted between modalities with increased costs associated with IMRT.     

Four-year outcomes of hypofractionated high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer allows dose escalation and delivery of higher biologically effective dose (BED). We evaluated the outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and HDR boost in a community setting.Methods and MaterialsBetween July 2003 and April 2008, 148 patients with prostate cancer were treated at Cancer Center of Irvine using two transperineal implants performed 1 week apart (22 Gy delivered in four fractions divided between two insertions and delivered twice daily), followed by IMRT (50.4 Gy). Hormonal therapy was given for 1 year to all patients with Gleason score of 8 or higher.ResultsPatient characteristics are as follows: median age at treatment, 71 years; American Joint Committee on Cancer Group IIB, 53%; Gleason score of 7, 41%; and Gleason score of 8 or higher, 14%. Median followup was 49 months, and median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was 0.15 ng/mL. The 4-year actuarial biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was 96.8/81% by Phoenix/PSA lower than 0.5 ng/mL criteria. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Practice Guidelines–defined recurrence risk groups, 4-year bDFS for low risk was 100/92.9%, intermediate risk was 100/86.7%, and high risk was 94/75.4% by Phoenix/PSA lower than 0.5 ng/mL criteria. No statistically significant difference in bDFS was detected by either failure criteria based on risk group, lymph node risk, or initial PSA. Treatment was well tolerated. Subacute/late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were limited to 10% and 5%, respectively of all patients.ConclusionsProstate IMRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost was well tolerated with appropriate PSA response and bDFS at 4 years, demonstrated in a community setting. This treatment schema provides a high BED, comparable with hypofractionated prostate regimens previously reported in the literature. Higher BED delivery should be explored in further dose escalation studies.     

Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy using real-time CT guidance

PurposeTo evaluate clinical outcomes of CT-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy for primary and recurrent gynecologic cancer.Methods and MaterialsRecords were reviewed for 68 women (34 with primary disease and 34 with recurrence) treated with CT-guided HDR interstitial brachytherapy between May 2005 and September 2011. Interstitial application was performed under general anesthesia using an iterative approach of catheter insertion and adjustment with serial image acquisition by CT in a dedicated brachytherapy suite. The median fractional brachytherapy dose was 3.9 Gy delivered twice daily in seven fractions. The median cumulative dose in equivalent 2-Gy fractions was 74.8 Gy. Actuarial survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and toxicity was reported by Common Toxicity Criteria.ResultsPrimary disease sites were endometrial (34), cervical (17), vaginal (11), ovarian (3), and vulvar (3). Median age was 61.5 years, and tumor size at diagnosis was 3.4 cm. Median D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ were 73.6 Gy and 87.5%, respectively; median D_2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 67.1, 64.6, and 53.7 Gy, respectively. With a median followup of 17 months, actuarial rates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years for all patients were 86%, 60%, and 64%, respectively. There were 9 grade 3 late toxicities (six gastrointestinal and three vulvovaginal).ConclusionsHDR interstitial brachytherapy with CT-guided catheter placement results in acceptable local control, toxicity, and survival rates for women with primary or recurrent gynecologic cancer. Durable pelvic control may be achieved in most patients with this specialized brachytherapy technique.     

Comparison of PSA relapse-free survival in patients treated with ultra-high-dose IMRT versus combination HDR brachytherapy and IMRT

PurposeWe report on a retrospective comparison of biochemical outcomes using an ultra-high dose of conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. a lower dose of IMRT combined with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy to increase the biologically effective dose of IMRT.MethodsPatients received IMRT of 86.4 Gy (n = 470) or HDR brachytherapy (21 Gy in three fractions) followed by IMRT of 50.4 Gy (n = 160). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined as PSA nadir + 2. Median followup was 53 months for IMRT alone and 47 months for HDR.ResultsThe 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) for HDR plus IMRT vs. ultra-high-dose IMRT were 100% vs. 98%, 98% vs. 84%, and 93% vs. 71%, for National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- (p = 0.71), intermediate- (p < 0.001), and high-risk (p = 0.23) groups, respectively. Treatment (p = 0.0006), T stage (p < 0.0001), Gleason score (p < 0.0001), pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0037), risk group (p < 0.0001), and lack of androgen-deprivation therapy (p = 0.0005) were significantly associated with improved PRFS on univariate analysis. HDR plus IMRT vs. ultra-high-dose IMRT (p = 0.0012, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.184); age (p = 0.0222, HR = 0.965); and risk group (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.683) were associated with improved PRFS on multivariate analysis.ConclusionDose escalation of IMRT by adding HDR brachytherapy provided improved PRFS in the treatment of prostate cancer compared with ultra-high-dose IMRT, independent of risk group on multivariate analysis, with the most significant benefit for intermediate-risk patients.     

Electronic brachytherapy for postsurgical adjuvant vaginal cuff irradiation therapy in endometrial and cervical cancer: A retrospective study

PurposeA new platform for brachytherapy called electronic brachytherapy (EBT) has been developed, which uses a miniature X-ray source to generate low-energy radiation. A retrospective study of adverse events and clinical outcomes in patients treated with EBT to the vaginal cuff, either as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), was conducted.Methods and MaterialsMedical records were reviewed from 16 patients treated with postoperative EBT for endometrial (n = 13) or cervical cancer (n = 3) between February 2009 and November 2010. Patients received either intracavitary vaginal EBT alone or EBT in combination with EBRT. The radiobiologic effectiveness of EBT was assumed to be one.ResultsMedian follow-up was 20.5 months (range, 7–36 months). When EBT was used alone (n = 5), the median dose per fraction, number of fractions, and total dose delivered were: 6 Gy (range, 5.5–6.2 Gy), 5 fractions (range, 5–6), and 30 Gy (range, 30–34 Gy), respectively. When EBT was combined with EBRT, the EBT component median dose per fraction, number of fractions, and total dose delivered were: 5 Gy (range, 4.5–7 Gy), 2 fractions (range, 2–4), and 14 Gy (range, 9–20 Gy), respectively. The median EBRT dose was 45 Gy (range, 45–49.2 Gy). Our local control rate, locoregional (pelvic) control rate, and overall survival rate were 94%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. Of the 16 patients, 4 patients reported Grade 2 or greater toxicity (25%); however, there were no Grade 4–5 adverse events. Gynecologic, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal adverse events accounted for 57% (n = 4), 43% (n = 3), and 0% (n = 0) of all Grade 2 or greater side effects. No Grade 2 or higher toxicities were noted in patients treated with EBT alone.ConclusionEBT is an acceptable means of delivering postoperative vaginal brachytherapy and appears comparable with other methods; as the sole method of treatment, the toxicity rates of EBT are low.     

High-dose-rate afterloading intraluminal brachytherapy for advanced inoperable rectal carcinoma

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) intraluminal brachytherapy for advanced or inoperable tumors of the rectum has been used both palliatively and to dose escalate after chemoradiation for curative treatment.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2007, 79 patients were treated with HDR afterloading brachytherapy for rectal cancer; 70 patients had adenocarcinoma of the rectum; and 9 patients had squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Fifty-two patients had localized disease but were unfit for major surgery and received radiotherapy with radical intent. Twenty-seven patients with advanced or metastatic disease received palliative treatment. The median age was 82 years (range, 33–97). Radical treatment comprised either chemoradiation followed by intraluminal brachytherapy delivering 12 Gy at 1 cm in two fractions or radical monotherapy delivering up to 36 Gy at 1 cm in six fractions two to three times weekly. Palliative HDR brachytherapy schedules were predominantly 10 Gy at 1 cm single dose.ResultsObjective local tumor response was seen in 41 of 48 assessable patients (85%); of whom, 28 patients (58%) had a complete response and 13 (27%) had a partial response. The most common symptom was rectal bleeding, which was controlled with a complete response rate of 63%. The median duration of the symptom response was 3 months (range, 1–73), and the median survival of the palliative patients was 6 months (range, 1 week–37 months). The median survival for patients treated with radical intent was 18.5 months (range, 2–119). Six patients reported late toxicity with three cases of rectal ulcer, two strictures, and one fistula.ConclusionsIntraluminal HDR brachytherapy is effective as local treatment in both the radical and palliative setting, with high tumor and symptom response rates, and acceptable late toxicity.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with conformal external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer

PurposeTo report long-term outcomes for treatment of prostate cancer using dose escalation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3DCRT), and compare them with outcomes for treatment of prostate cancer with 3DCRT alone at the same institution.Methods and MaterialsFrom 1998 to 2003, 587 patients were treated for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients received either 3DCRT (median, 46 Gy) with a single HDR brachytherapy implant (196 patients) delivering a fractionated dose of 18 Gy (combined group) or 3DCRT (median, 70 Gy; 387 patients; “3DCRT alone”). There were 41.9% patients with intermediate-risk and 42.6% with high-risk disease. In all, 441 patients (75.1%) received neoadjuvant and 116 patients (19.8%) received adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. The American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Phoenix definition for biochemical failure was used.ResultsThe median followup was 5.5 years. The 5- and 7-year biochemical control (BC) rates were 82.5% and 80.3%, respectively, for the combined group and 81.3% and 71%, respectively, for 3DCRT alone; for overall survival, they were 91.9% and 89.5% vs. 88.7% and 86.2%, respectively, whereas for cause-specific survival, they were 96.9% and 96.1% vs. 97.6% and 96.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for BC revealed that low Gleason grade, HDR brachytherapy combined with 3DCRT, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy were significant in predicting BC. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 late urinary and rectal morbidity rates were 7.1% and 0%, respectively. No Grade ≥4 reactions were detected.ConclusionsHDR brachytherapy combined with 3DCRT was associated with improved BC and minimal toxicity in patients with unfavorable prostate cancer compared with conventional 3DCRT.     

External beam radiotherapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: The initial experience of the Catalan Institute of Oncology

PurposeThe objective of this study was to report initial outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (CaP) who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a boost.Methods and MaterialsFrom 2002 to 2007, 114 CaP patients underwent EBRT followed by ¹⁹²I HDR-BT. The patients were classified into intermediate- (Group 1) or high- (Group 2) risk groups. The mean total EBRT dose was 60.0 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.9–60.1) at 2 Gy per fraction. After a mean of 20.6 days (95% CI: 18.4–22.8), all the patients received a single-fraction 9-Gy dose of HDR-BT boost. Of the 114 patients in the study, 103 (90.4%) underwent up to 3 years of complete androgen deprivation therapy after diagnosis.ResultsThe mean followup for the entire group was 32.1 months (95% CI: 29.9–34.4). The 4-year biochemical failure-free survival rate was 97.4% and treatment was well-tolerated.ConclusionsPreliminary biochemical control rates after EBRT plus one fraction of 9-Gy HDR-BT are encouraging. This atypical fractionation schedule is cost-effective and reduces patient discomfort and treatment-related risks. More followup is required to confirm these findings.     

Predicting biochemical tumor control after brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience

PurposeTo identify predictors of biochemical tumor control and present an updated prognostic nomogram for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsOne thousand four hundred sixty-six patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy alone or along with supplemental conformal radiotherapy. Nine hundred one patients (61%) were treated with Iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) monotherapy to a prescribed dose of 144 Gy, and 41 (4.5%) were treated with Palladium-103 (¹⁰³Pd) monotherapy to a prescribed dose of 125 Gy. In patients with higher risk features (n = 715), a combined modality approach was used, which comprised ¹²⁵I or ¹⁰³Pd seed implantation or Iridium-192 high–dose rate brachytherapy followed 1–2 months later by supplemental intensity-modulated image-guided radiotherapy to the prostate.ResultsThe 5-year prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) outcomes for favorable-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 98%, 95%, and 80%, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified Gleason score (p < 0.001) and pretreatment PSA (p = 0.04) as predictors for PSA tumor control. In this cohort of patients, the use of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy did not influence biochemical tumor control outcomes. In the subset of patients treated with ¹²⁵I monotherapy, D₉₀ > 140 Gy compared with lower doses was associated with improved PSA-RFS. A nomogram predicting PSA-RFS was developed based on these predictors and had a concordance index of 0.70.ConclusionsResults with brachytherapy for all treatment groups were excellent. D₉₀ higher than 140 Gy was associated with improved biochemical tumor control compared with lower doses. Androgen deprivation therapy use did not impact on tumor control outcomes in these patients.     

Image-guided vulvovaginal interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of primary and recurrent gynecological malignancies

PurposeEvaluation of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) to the vulvovaginal region both alone and in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for primary or recurrent gynecological malignancy.Methods and MaterialsFrom 1998 to 2009, 37 women with a mean age of 68 years were treated with transperineal interstitial HDRB. Fifteen patients (40.5%) were treated for primary disease, whereas 22 (59.5%) patients were treated for recurrent disease. Median time to local recurrence was 31 months (2–312 months). Primary sites included endometrium (12), vulva (11), vagina (10), vulvovagina (1), cervix (1), and bladder (2). Thirty-one patients (83.7%) in this series were treated with radical intent, whereas 6 (16.3%) were treated with palliative intent. Radically treated patients received between 45 and 60 Gy (median, 45 Gy) of EBRT. The median number of days from EBRT to HDR boost was 5 days (1–35 days). The HDRB doses ranged from 11 Gy in two fractions to 42 Gy in six fractions (dose per fraction varied from 4 to 8.5 Gy) and fractions were given at least 6–8 h apart.ResultsEight of the 31 patients (26%) treated with radical intent relapsed locally. Eleven of 37 patients (30%) treated with either radical or palliative intent recurred locally. The 2- and 5-year local progression-free survival was 74% and 63.4%, respectively. The total progression-free survival, which includes local, locoregional/nodal, and distant recurrence, at 2 and 5 years, was 73.6% and 45.6%, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 27 months (3.8–111.9 months), the median survival for the patient group was 16.6 months with a 2- and 5-year overall survival of 47.7% and 36.4%, respectively. Acute Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 13 (35%) of the 37 patients (skin: 10, urinary: 2, genital: 2, gastrointestinal: 0). No acute Grade 4 toxicities were seen. A total of 10 of the 37 patients (27%) developed late Grade 3 toxicities. Five of the 22 patients (22%) treated for recurrent disease with radical intent developed Grade 3 toxicity (skin: 4, urinary: 2, genital: 1, radiation-induced fracture of acetabulum: 1, and gastrointestinal: 0), whereas 1 of the 6 patients treated with palliative intent had Grade 3 toxicity affecting skin. No late Grade 4 toxicities were seen.ConclusionThis retrospective series suggests that interstitial perineal HDRB is a safe and effective treatment option for primary or locally recurrent gynecological malignancies. It is a valuable option in patients who have received previous EBRT to the pelvis, achieving good local control with acceptable late treatment-related side effects.     

Phase I/II trial of single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy-boosted hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PurposeA Phase I/II protocol was conducted to examine the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a single-fraction high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy implant.Methods and MaterialsFrom 2001 through 2006, 26 consecutive patients were treated on the trial. The primary objective was to demonstrate a high rate of completion without experiencing a treatment-limiting toxicity. Eligibility was limited to patients with T stage ≤2b, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20, and Gleason score ≤7. Treatment began with a single HDR fraction of 6 Gy to the entire prostate and 9 Gy to the peripheral zone, followed by IMRT optimized to deliver in 28 fractions with a normalized total dose of 70 Gy. Patients received 50.4 Gy to the pelvic lymph node. The prostate dose (IMRT and HDR) resulted in an average biologic equivalent dose >128 Gy (α/β = 3). Patients whose pretreatment PSA was ≥10 ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or stage ≥T2b received short-term androgen ablation.ResultsMedian followup was 53 months (9–68 months). There were no biochemical failures by either the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology or the Phoenix definitions. The median nadir PSA was 0.32 ng/mL. All the 26 patients completed the treatment as prescribed. The rate of Grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was 3.8% consisting of a urethral stricture. There was no other Grade 3 or 4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities.ConclusionsSingle-fraction HDR-boosted IMRT is a safe effective method of dose escalation for localized prostate cancer.     

Prostate-specific antigen bounce after high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy

PurposeTo report the frequency, timing, and magnitude of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce (PB) in patients who received high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (HDRB) plus hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (HypoRT) and to assess a possible correlation between PB and biochemical failure (BF).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer received 10 Gy single-fraction ¹⁹²Ir HDRB followed by 50 Gy in 20 daily fractions of HypoRT without androgen deprivation therapy. All patients had a minimum 2-year followup. The PB was defined as PSA elevation higher than 0.2 ng/mL from previous measurement with subsequent drop to pre-bounce level. The BF was defined as PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL.ResultsA total of 114 patients treated between 2001 and 2009 were eligible for analysis. At a median followup of 66 months, the PB was found in 45 (39%) patients with a median time to bounce of 16 months (range, 3–76 months). The median time to PSA normalization after a PB was 9 months (range, 2–40 months). The median magnitude of PB was 0.45 ng/mL (range, 0.2–6.62). The BF occurred in 12 (10.5%) patients of whom three had a PB. Median time to BF was 52.5 months. Four patients (3.5%) in the PB group fit the criteria for BF.ConclusionsThe PB is common after HDRB and HypoRT and can occur up to 76 months after treatment. It can rarely fit the criteria for BF. The time to PB is shorter than the time to BF. There is a lower incidence of BF in patients with a PB. An acknowledgment of this phenomenon should be made when interpreting PSA results during followup to prevent unnecessary interventions.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for carcinoma of external auditory canal

PurposeTo report dosimetry and outcome in a case of early stage carcinoma of external ear (T1N0M0) treated with radical radiotherapy alone using a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary irradiation with a high-dose-rate (HDR) ¹⁹²Ir remote afterloading system.Methods and MethodsA 64-year-old gentleman who was diagnosed as T1N0M0 carcinoma of external ear was treated with combination of external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy (BRT). A total dose of 40 Gy was delivered by EBRT, following which a 6-Fr catheter for the HDR ¹⁹²Ir remote afterloader, fixed by a customized acrylic mold, was inserted into the external auditory canal (EAC) and a total intracavitary radiation dose of 22.5 Gy (4.5 Gy/F) was given.ResultsEvaluation at the completion of treatment and at the end of 4-year followup revealed no evidence of the disease.ConclusionsIn the radical treatment of early stage EAC carcinoma, combination of external beam radiation therapy and BRT may be a modality of choice for its efficacy, less severe side effects, and better cosmetic results.     

PSA bounce after prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

PurposeTo assess the impact of PSA bounce (PB) on biochemical failure (BF) and clinical failure (CF) in brachytherapy patients treated with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (AD).Methods and MaterialsFrom 1987 to 2003, 691 patients with clinical stage T1–T3N0M0 prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost (n = 407), HDR brachytherapy alone (n = 93), or permanent seed implant (n = 191). Three hundred seventeen patients (46%) received neoadjuvant/adjuvant AD with RT. BF was scored using 3 definitions (ASTRO—3 rises, nadir + 2 ng/ml, and threshold 3 ng/ml) based on current and absolute nadir (AN) methodologies. PB was defined as any increase in PSA followed by a decrease to the prior baseline or lower. The median followup was 4.0 years.ResultsForty-six patients (7%) experienced CF at 5 years. PB of ≥0.1, ≥1.0, and ≥2.0 ng/ml at any time after RT occurred in 330 (48%), 60 (9%), and 22 patients (3%) respectively. The use of an AN definition reduced the likelihood of scoring PB as BF across all levels. The patients receiving AD experienced significantly longer bounce duration. Bounce <1.0 ng/ml showed no association with CF. For bounce ≥1.0 ng/ml, 10% demonstrated CF vs. 6% without bounce of this amplitude (p = 0.27). Bounces ≥1.0 ng/ml were more likely to be scored as BFs for definitions based on current nadir (3 rises: 20% vs. 13%, nadir + 2: 43% vs. 11%, 3 at/after nadir: 57% vs. 12%) than those based on AN (3 rises: 8% vs. 10%, nadir + 2: 18% vs. 11%, 3 at/after nadir: 13% vs. 11%).ConclusionsBounces ≥1.0 ng/ml are rare after brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant AD, occurring in less than 10% of patients. Low PBs have little impact on BF, but as PB amplitude increases, the BF rate increases. BF definitions based on AN are less sensitive to PB after brachytherapy.     

Localized prostate cancer with intermediate- or high-risk features treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and iodine-125 seed brachytherapy

ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare the results of the combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy vs. brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer treatment in patients with intermediate and high risk of disease recurrence.Methods and MaterialsNinety-six patients were treated from January 1998 to December 2006. Twenty-four patients received combined treatment and 72 patients received brachytherapy alone. Patients were classified into intermediate or high risk of recurrence according to the D’Amico’s classification. The prescribed dose for brachytherapy was 145 Gy as monotherapy and 110 Gy for combined treatment. The dose of EBRT was 45 Gy over 5 weeks, with 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Results were analyzed based on Phoenix definition of biochemical recurrence, that is, nadir plus 2 ng/mL.ResultsBiochemical control was achieved by 96% (23 of 24) of patients receiving combined treatment and by 72% (52 of 72) in the group treated by brachytherapy alone (p < 0.015). The addition of EBRT resulted in a 94% biochemical disease-free survival at 5 years; and in brachytherapy alone group, the rate was 54% (p < 0.011). Mean followup was 96 months (24–132 months; confidence interval 95%: 90–102).ConclusionThis study shows that in patients with localized prostate cancer, with intermediate and high risk of biochemical recurrence, the addition of EBRT can confer a significant biochemical control advantage when added to brachytherapy.