Low-dose combination therapy as first-line hypertension treatment for blacks and nonblacks

To assess the efficacy and safety of bisoprolol/6.25-mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, and enalapril in black and nonblack patients, data from two comparative studies were pooled and subgroup analyses performed. Both studies had similar designs and included all three active treatments. The second study also included a placebo group. Subjects (n = 541) with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95-114 mmHg were titrated to achieve a diastolic blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg. The studies included 114 blacks and 427 nonblacks. Results of an intention-to-treat analysis of mean change from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment showed the following: 1) blood pressure was significantly lowered by all three active drugs compared with baseline or placebo; 2) in blacks, bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ resulted in significantly greater reductions of systolic and diastolic blood pressure than enalapril or placebo, but was not significantly different from amlodipine; 3) in nonblacks, bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ resulted in significantly greater reduction of diastolic blood pressure than amlodipine, enalapril, or placebo. The placebo-corrected change in blood pressure was greater for blacks than whites on the bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ combination, but this was not statistically significant. Bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ controlled diastolic blood pressure to < or = 90 mmHg in significantly more patients than enalapril or placebo in blacks and nonblacks. The difference in control rates was not significant versus amlodipine. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar between treatments; however, bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ had a lower discontinuation rate due to lack of blood pressure control or adverse experiences in both blacks and nonblacks.     

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of cetirizine given once daily in children with perennial allergic rhinitis

The present study compared the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of cetirizine (2.5. 5, and 10 mg) once a day with placebo over 14 days in 6–12-year-old children with perennial allergic rhinitis. The design was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study. Five symptoms (sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, nasal pruritus, and ocular pruritus) were rated according to severity by investigators at the visits and daily by patients. Eighty-three patients were randomized to placebo, 84 to 2.5 mg cetirizine, 85 to 5 mg cetirizine, and 76 to 10 mg cetirizine. Groups were comparable at inclusion. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of days with no or only mild symptoms: at all doses, cetirizine appeared to be more effective than placebo, but a significant difference was reached only in the 10-mg group (difference in medians of 22%; P = 0.016). The test of linearity was significant ( P = 0.026) for the percentage of asymptomatic days. The investigators' assessments at each visit scored the symptoms in the placebo group higher, i.e., more severe, than in the active groups, the 10-mg dose causing the greatest reduction in symptoms. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild or moderate in severity. It was concluded that cetirizine at a 10-mg, once daily dose could be used to treat effectively 6–12-year-old children with perennial allergic rhinitis.     

Effect of omeprazole and ranitidine on ulcer healing and relapse rates in patients with benign gastric ulcer

Omeprazole blocks the action of H+,K+-ATPase in the gastric mucosa and thus inhibits the secretion of hydrochloric acid. We conducted a double-blind multicenter study (45 centers in 13 countries) of 602 patients with benign gastric or prepyloric ulcers to compare the effectiveness of omeprazole (20 mg once daily, 203 patients, or 40 mg once daily, 194 patients) and ranitidine, an H2-receptor antagonist (150 mg twice daily, 205 patients) in promoting ulcer healing and to evaluate the pattern of ulcer relapse during a six-month follow-up. Healing occurred at four weeks in 80 percent of the patients receiving 40 mg of omeprazole, 69 percent of those receiving 20 mg of omeprazole, 69 percent of those receiving ranitidine. At eight weeks, the corresponding figures were 96, 89, and 85 percent. A multivariate analysis of ulcer healing showed that at four weeks the ulcers of significantly more patients receiving omeprazole had healed as compared with patients receiving ranitidine (omeprazole, 40 mg, vs. ranitidine, P less than 0.0005; omeprazole, 20 mg, vs. ranitidine, P = 0.01). At eight weeks, the 40-mg dose of omeprazole was significantly more effective than ranitidine (P = 0.001) or the 20-mg dose of omeprazole (P = 0.03). Ulcer symptoms were relieved faster with omeprazole. In 68 patients receiving concurrent nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, the healing rates at four weeks were 81 percent in the group receiving 40 mg of omeprazole, 61 percent in the group receiving 20 mg, and 32 percent in the group receiving ranitidine; at eight weeks, the corresponding figures were 95, 82, and 53 percent. During the six-month follow-up period (without treatment), significantly more patients in the omeprazole groups were free of symptoms and ulcers than in the ranitidine group. We conclude that in the dose used, omeprazole is superior to ranitidine in the treatment of benign gastric ulcers.     

Captopril, an orally active converting enzyme inhibitor, in the treatment of primary hypertension. A controlled long-term study with reference to initial plasma renin activity

Captopril (SQ 14 225), an orally active inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme, was evaluated in the treatment of primary (essential) hypertension in a placebo-controlled long-term study. In 24 patients allocated to captopril treatment, mean supine BP fell from 174 +/- 18/110 +/- 7 to 151 +/- 22/96 +/- 12 mmHg. Ten patients achieved a supine diastolic BP of less than or equally 90 mmHg with a mean BP fall of 28/22 mmHg after 4 weeks' captopril dose titration (75-450 mg daily). In 14 patients, BP fell 19/9 mmHg. When hydrochlorothiazide (50-100 mg daily) was subsequently added, a total supine BP reduction of 51/20 mmHg was noted. In the placebo control group (n = 16), BP changed +1/-2 mmHg from 171/110 mmHg while addition of hydrochlorothiazide caused a mean supine BP fall of 19/10 mmHg. During long-term follow-up (mean 11.8 months), no resistance to therapy developed. A weak correlation, (p less than 0.05) was seen between pretreatment plasma renin activity and initial captopril-induced BP reduction. However, in patients with clearly defined low renin hypertension, the hypotensive effect of captopril was much less than in patients with higher renin values. Captopril induced a significant decrease in urinary aldosterone excretion, which was partially reversed by addition of hydrochlorothiazide. Observed side-effects were proteinuria (1 case), rash (2 cases) and taste disturbances (3 cases). During long-term follow-up, seven patients have dropped out, four due to side-effects and three because of non-compliance.     

Ecological impact of the des-F(6)-quinolone, BMS-284756, on the normal intestinal microflora

Objective   BMS-284756 (T-3811ME) is a novel des-F(6)-quinolone effective against a broad spectrum of aerobic and anaerobic pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the ecological effect of BMS-284756 on the intestinal microflora.
Methods   Forty healthy subjects participated in the trial. Eight subjects were assigned to each of five dose panels (100, 200, 400, 800 and 1200 mg BMS-284756) and received daily oral dosing with either BMS-284756 ( n  = 6) or placebo ( n  = 2) for 14 days. Fecal samples were collected before (days −2 and −1), during (days 7 and 14), and after (days 21, 28, and 45) completion of the administration period.
Results   In subjects receiving 100 or 200 mg BMS-284756, no significant changes in the intestinal aerobic and anaerobic microflora occurred. The number of enterococci, bacilli, corynebacteria, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia and bacteroides decreased in subjects receiving 400 or 800 mg BMS-284756, whereas the number of eubacteria increased. Subjects who received 1200 mg BMS-284756 had significant changes in the microflora: enterococci, bacilli, corynebacteria, enterobacteria, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia and bacteroides were suppressed, whereas eubacteria and yeasts were increased. Regardless of dose, the microflora returned to normal levels at day 28 (2 weeks after the administration of BMS-284756 was discontinued). Fecal concentrations of BMS-284756 increased with the higher doses, from 35.7 mg/kg (100 mg) to 262.8 mg/kg (1200 mg). These ecological findings should be considered if 800- or 1200-mg doses of BMS-284756 are to be used for longer periods than 14 days.
Conclusion   The ecological impact of BMS-284756 is selective, with results similar to those described for other quinolones.     

Doxazosin versus bendrofluazide: a comparison of the metabolic effects in British South Asians with hypertension

BACKGROUND: People from British South Asian communities have an increased risk of mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD). Doxazosin, a selective alpha(1)-adrenergic blocker, in addition to lowering blood pressure, has been shown to have positive effects on glucose metabolism and lipid profiles in patients with hypertension. AIM: We studied doxazosin (1-8 mg) and bendrofluazide (2.5 mg) in patients of British South Asian origin with existing mild to moderate hypertension (doxazosin n = 78; bendrofluazide n = 82), to compare their effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in this group. DESIGN OF STUDY: A 34-week randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study. SETTING: Primary care in the UK. METHOD: All doxazosin patients started with an initial dose of 1 mg once daily, titrated to a maximum 8 mg once daily if diastolic blood pressure was >90 mmHg or was not <5 mmHg of the baseline value. The primary efficacy variables were mean glucose and total cholesterol concentrations at week 21. RESULT: Doxazosin reduced glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides and increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. There were significant differences between doxazosin and bendrofluazide for glucose concentrations at week 21 (P = 0.029) and week 34 (P = 0.015), total cholesterol at week 21 (P = 0.048) and triglycerides at week 21 (P = 0.047) and week 34 (P = 0.009). There was no significant difference in blood pressure lowering between the two treatments. CONCLUSION: Doxazosin exhibits beneficial effects on glucose concentrations and lipid profile, in particular in lowering triglyceride concentrations in British South Asians. Whether these desirable characteristics translate to improved overall cardiovascular risk requires formal evaluation.     

Dose-finding study of daily gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges in IVF/ICSI patients: antide and hormone levels

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to define the minimal effective dose of antide (Iturelix) to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. METHODS: In a prospective, single centre study, 144 IVF/ICSI patients were stimulated with r-hFSH from cycle day 2 and from cycle day 6 onwards, cotreated with daily 2 mg/2 ml (n=30), 1 mg/ml (n=30), 0.5 mg/ml (n=31), 0.5 mg/0.5 ml (n=23) and 0.25 mg/ml (n=30) GnRH antagonist (antide). Serum samples were taken three times daily during antide administration to assess antide and hormone levels. The minimal effective dose was defined as the lowest dose group with <2 LH surges (LH >12.4 IU/l and progesterone >2 ng/ml). RESULTS: Serum antide levels, mean LH and E2 levels per day and their area under the curves were dose-related to antide. The bioavailability of antide almost doubled after dilution in larger volumes. Pre-injection LH levels gradually increased during GnRH antagonist treatment. LH surges occurred in the lowest dose groups 0.5 mg/ml (3.2%), 0.5 mg/0.5 ml (6.7%) and 0.25 mg/ml (13.3%). Hence, 0.5 mg/ml is considered to be the minimal effective dose. Antide was overall well tolerated and safe. CONCLUSIONS: 0.5 mg/ml antide is the minimal effective dose to prevent an untimely LH surge in IVF patients stimulated with r-hFSH.     

A 12‐week, placebo‐controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ebastine, 10 and 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study investigated the ability of ebastine, 10 and 20 mg once daily, to control symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) over a 12-week period, and assessed additional benefits of the 20-mg dose. Following a 2-week baseline period, patients (12-63 years) were randomized to treatment with ebastine 10 mg (n=88) or 20 mg (n=102), or placebo (n=100). Patients scored symptom severity (0-3) twice daily, and mean changes from baseline scores showed ebastine to be significantly effective in week 1. Control of symptoms persisted over the 12 weeks, the average daily total nasal symptom score for nasal stuffiness plus nasal discharge plus sneezing plus itchy nose being reduced by both doses, with statistical significance at 20 mg (P=0.015 vs placebo) despite decreased usage of sodium cromoglycate rescue medications. Patient and clinician final opinions of treatment also significantly favoured ebastine, both 10 and 20 mg, over placebo. No serious adverse events occurred, and study treatments were well tolerated with a low incidence of central nervous system-related adverse events and headache. In conclusion, ebastine 10 or 20 mg once daily was rapidly effective in relieving symptoms of PAR in adult and adolescent patients; additional benefits of the 20-mg dose became apparent in the longer term.     

The effect of various doses of mifepristone on endometrial leukaemia inhibitory factor expression in the midluteal phase--an immunohistochemical study

Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a cytokine which plays an obligatory role in mouse blastocyst implantation. In human endometrium, LIF expression is significantly increased in the mid-luteal phase indicating that LIF may also play an important role in the human. We have previously shown that a single dose of 200 mg of mifepristone immediately post-ovulation is an effective contraceptive method, probably due to inhibition of endometrial development and function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various doses of mifepristone on endometrial LIF expression. A total of 22 fertile, regularly-menstruating women were studied during control and treatment cycles. The subjects were divided into four groups: group I received a single dose of 200 mg of mifepristone on cycle day LH + 2 (n = 7). The subjects in groups II and III were treated with either 5 mg (n = 5) or 2.5 mg (n = 5) once a week for 2 months. Group IV subjects received 0.5 mg per day (n = 5) of mifepristone for 3 months. LIF was measured immunohistochemically in endometrial tissue specimens taken on the corresponding day (cycle day LH + 6 to LH + 8) in hormonally- characterized control and treatment cycles. LIF immunostaining was observed in all controls and located to the cytoplasm of the luminal and glandular epithelial cells and stromal cells. In the treatment cycles the staining of luminal epithelium and stroma was similar to controls, while the glandular staining was reduced in all treatment groups. This study reveals that early luteal phase treatment as well as intermittent or daily low dose treatment with mifepristone reduces endometrial glandular LIF expression at the expected time of implantation. The results further support the contraceptive potential of mifepristone in low doses.      

Endometrial safety of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy with 17beta-oestradiol (1 or 2 mg) and dydrogesterone

Objectives: To determine the endometrial safety of oral 17β-oestradiol combined continuously with dydrogesterone in preventing endometrial proliferation. Methods: The low dose group comprised three 52-week (13 cycles of 28 days) studies (two of which were double blind) using a 17β-oestradiol dose of 1 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg daily. The high dose group comprised two 24-week double-blind studies using a 17β-oestradiol dose of 2 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2.5, 5, 10 or 15 mg daily. Endometrial safety was verified by aspiration endometrial biopsies. Inadequate progestational response was defined as proliferative endometrium, endometrial polyp, hyperplasia and carcinoma. Results: Data was evaluable from 650 healthy postmenopausal women in the low dose group and 310 in the high dose group. Endometrial protection was achieved with dydrogesterone at doses of 5 mg or higher combined with 1 or 2 mg 17β-oestradiol. The success rate was 97%, 97% and 98% in women receiving 1/5, 1/10 and 1/20 mg, respectively, and 95%, 98% and 91% in women receiving 2/5, 2/10 and 2/15 mg, respectively. A lower success rate was achieved with the 2.5 mg dydrogesterone dosage (93% in the 1/2.5 mg group and 85% in the 2/2.5 mg group) due to more cases of proliferative endometrium. None of the women in the low dose group developed hyperplasia or carcinoma; five (0.7%) had endometrial polyps. In the high dose group, one woman given 2.5 mg dydrogesterone developed hyperplasia; there were no cases of carcinoma. Conclusion: 5 mg daily dydrogesterone appears to be the lowest effective dose to ensure endometrial safety in a continuous combined regimen with 1 or 2 mg 17β-oestradiol.     

Treatment approaches to major depressive disorder relapse. Part 1: dose increase

OBJECTIVE: Although continuing antidepressant treatment after patients have responded to medication has been shown to greatly reduce the risk of relapse, this risk is not eliminated. A number of theories have been proposed to account for this apparent loss of efficacy. A common initial approach to managing relapse is to increase the dose of antidepressant. We prospectively evaluated the likelihood of response to increasing the fluoxetine doses in patients relapsing during a long-term efficacy study of two fluoxetine dosing regimens. METHOD: Patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder with modified HAMD17 scores > or =18 and CGI-severity scores > or =4 were treated for 13 weeks with open-label 20 mg/day fluoxetine in a multicenter US study. Responders (n = 501) were randomized to 20 mg fluoxetine daily, placebo, or 90 mg enteric-coated fluoxetine weekly for 25 weeks of double-blind continuation treatment. If the patients relapsed during the continuation phase, they were offered a 25-week optional rescue treatment phase during which the study medication dose was increased as follows: (1) patients on placebo had treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day reinitiated, (2) patients on fluoxetine 20 mg/day had their dose increased to 40 mg/day, and (3) patients on a 90-mg weekly dose had their dose increased to 90 mg twice a week. The results of the rescue phase for the latter two groups who relapsed while on continuation treatment with fluoxetine are reported. Response was defined as a 50% reduction in the modified HAMD17 score since time of relapse and a CGI-severity score < or =2. Additional efficacy analyses included HAMD and CGI-severity changes from baseline to endpoint. Safety measures included assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory measures. RESULTS: Overall, patients relapsing during the continuation treatment responded to an increased dose (57% of the 40-mg-daily group and 72% of the enteric-coated 90-mg-twice-weekly group). Mean modified HAMD17 scores decreased from a mean of approximately 20 to below 8 and were maintained for up to 6 months in the responders. Thirty-five percent of patients either did not respond or initially responded but again relapsed after augmentation of medication. CONCLUSIONS: The patients relapsing after initially responding to fluoxetine can benefit from an increase in fluoxetine dose. These results also generally support increasing dose as a first-line treatment strategy for a patient who has relapsed while taking a previously effective dose of an antidepressant. Increasing enteric-coated fluoxetine 90 mg once weekly to twice weekly appeared to be as well-tolerated and effective in restoring response as increasing a daily fluoxetine dose from 20 to 40 mg.     

Oxandrolone in the treatment of HIV-associated weight loss in men: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxandrolone in promoting body weight and body cell mass (BCM) gain in HIV-associated weight loss. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Two hundred sixty-two HIV-infected men with documented 10% to 20% weight loss or body mass index < or =20 kg/m were randomized to placebo or to 20, 40, or 80 mg of oxandrolone daily. After 12 weeks, subjects were allowed to receive open-label oxandrolone at a dose of 20 mg for another 12 weeks. RESULTS: Body weight increased in all groups, including the group receiving placebo, during the double-blind phase (1.1 +/- 2.7, 1.8 +/- 3.9, 2.8 +/- 3.3, and 2.3 +/- 2.9 kg in placebo and 20-, 40-, and 80-mg oxandrolone groups, respectively; all P < 0.014 vs. baseline). BCM increased from baseline in all groups (0.45 +/- 1.7, 0.91 +/- 2.2, 1.5 +/- 2.5, and 1.8 +/- 1.8 kg in placebo and 20-, 40-, and 80-mg oxandrolone groups, respectively). At 12 weeks, only the gain in weight at the 40-mg dose of oxandrolone and the gain in BCM at the 40- and 80-mg doses of oxandrolone were greater than those in the placebo group, however. Oxandrolone treatment was associated with significant suppression of sex hormone-binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and total and free testosterone levels. Treatment was generally well tolerated but accompanied by significant increases in transaminases and low-density lipoprotein as well as decreases in high-density lipoprotein. CONCLUSION: Oxandrolone administration is effective in promoting dose-dependent gains in body weight and BCM in HIV-infected men with weight loss.     

Effect of tiagabine on sleep in elderly subjects with primary insomnia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

SUBJECT OBJECTIVE: This study further evaluated the effects of tiagabine on sleep in elderly subjects with primary insomnia. METHODS: Elderly subjects (aged 65-85 years) meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for primary insomnia were randomly assigned to receive tiagabine 2, 4, 6, or 8 mg or placebo on 2 consecutive nights. Efficacy was assessed using standard polysomnography and a postsleep questionnaire. Additional assessments included the Assessment of Daily Functioning, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (for residual effects), and visual analog scale (for sleepiness/alertness). RESULTS: A total of 207 subjects were randomly assigned to study medication (tiagabine: 2 mg, n = 43; 4 mg, n = 38; 6 mg, n = 45; 8 mg, n = 43; placebo, n = 38). Tiagabine did not significantly effect wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, or total sleep time compared with placebo (P > .05). Significant increases in Stage 3+4 sleep (i.e., slow-wave sleep) were found for tiagabine 4, 6, and 8 mg versus placebo, with a corresponding significant decrease in Stage 1 sleep (P < .05). At 6 and 8 mg, tiagabine also significantly reduced the number of awakenings and increased the ratio of Stage 3+4/(Stage 1 +wake after sleep onset). In general, there were no significant effects on subjects' ratings of sleep or daily functioning with tiagabine 2, 4, and 6 mg versus placebo. These 3 doses had tolerability profiles comparable with that of placebo and were not associated with significant residual effects or reduced alertness. The 8-mg dose, however, significantly decreased subjective total sleep time and refreshing quality of sleep, as well as daily functioning. This dose was associated with troublesome adverse events, significant residual effects, and reduced alertness. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly subjects with primary insomnia, tiagabine did not have a significant effect on wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, total sleep time, or the subjective rating of sleep. Tiagabine 4, 6, and 8 mg significantly increased slow-wave sleep, with a corresponding significant decrease in Stage 1 sleep. Tiagabine was generally well tolerated, with doses of less than 6 mg having tolerability profiles generally similar to that of placebo. The 8-mg dose, however, was associated with troublesome adverse events, residual effects, and reduced alertness.     

Tibolone relieves climacteric symptoms in highly symptomatic women with at least seven hot flushes and sweats per day

Objective: To establish the potency of four dose levels of tibolone, a tissue selective estrogenic activity regulator (STEAR), to relieve climacteric symptoms in a subgroup of highly symptomatic women experiencing a minimum of seven hot flushes and sweats per day. Methods: In a group of 770 women receiving tibolone 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 or 5.0 mg or placebo for 12 weeks, a total of 317 women experienced at least seven hot flushes and sweats per day. Frequency and intensity of climacteric symptoms were assessed at baseline and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Vaginal bleeding/spotting was studied using diary cards. Occurrence of adverse events was determined by active questioning. Results: Tibolone induced a decrease in the frequency and intensity of climacteric symptoms, leading to statistically significant differences compared to placebo for dose levels of 1.25 mg and higher. The incidence of vaginal bleeding/spotting and of drug-related adverse events was similar in all tibolone dose groups, except for the 5.0 mg group, where the incidence was about twice as high. Dropout rate due to insufficient therapeutic effect is substantially higher in the 0.625 and 1.25 mg group (about 10%) compared to the 2.5 and 5.0 mg group (about 1%). These results are consistent with what occurred in the total study population published previously. Conclusion: The effects of tibolone in highly symptomatic women experiencing at least seven hot flushes and sweats per day do not differ much from that in the total study population. A daily dose of 2.5 mg is the optimal dose for both the total study population and the subgroup of highly symptomatic women. However, in order to optimise individual treatment, the 1.25 mg dose might also be taken into consideration.     

The effectiveness of labetalol compared to hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive black patients.

Labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared for their efficacy in controlling hypertension of blacks in a prospective, double-blind study. Sixty-one adult patients with mild to moderate hypertension (standing diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg and less than or equal to 114 mm Hg) were randomly selected to receive either labetalol 100 mg twice daily (n = 30) or HCTZ 25 mg twice daily (n = 31). The study was divided into two phases: a 4-week placebo run-in phase, during which all previous antihypertensive medication was discontinued, and a 12-week drug treatment phase. Labetalol and HCTZ doses were titrated to 400 mg twice and 50 mg twice daily, respectively, during the first 6 weeks of the drug treatment phase for those patients not achieving blood pressure control (standing diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg and a decrease of 10 mm Hg from baseline) on initial dosages. By the end of the 12 weeks of drug administration, patients on labetalol experienced a mean decrease of 10 mm Hg in standing diastolic blood pressure compared to a mean decrease of 10.1 mm Hg in patients on HCTZ. No differences were observed between the two treatment groups in reductions of either standing blood pressure or heart rate. While 19 of 30 patients on labetalol (63%) achieved blood pressure control at some point during the study with a mean daily dose of 568 mg, 18 of 31 (58%) HCTZ-treated patients achieved control with a mean daily dose of 72 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Low dose transdermal estradiol/norethisterone acetate treatment over 2 years does not cause endometrial proliferation in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of 2-year transdermal continuous combined estradiol (0.025 mg/day) and norethisterone acetate (0.125 mg/day) (Estragest TTS) on bleeding and on the endometrium. DESIGN: This double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel, 1-year trial enrolled 266 healthy women at least 2 years past menopause with intact uteri. Patients received a transdermal patch delivering either 0.025 mg estradiol and 0.125 mg norethisterone acetate daily or placebo. Of the 266 women initially included, 135 (96 Estragest TTS, 39 placebo) completed a second year open follow-up, where all women had the estradiol/norethisterone patch. Endometrial biopsies were performed at weeks 0, 48 (n = 171), and 96 (n =109). Effects on endometrial morphology and uterine bleeding were studied. RESULTS: The overall incidence of endometrial hyperplasia after treatment with the estradiol/norethisterone acetate patch for one year was 0.8% with only one case of atypical hyperplasia. There were no clinically significant changes in endometrial thickness in either treatment group. The proportion of bleed-free patients with the estradiol/norethisterone acetate transdermal system increased from 55% in cycles 1-3 to 83% in cycles 10-12. By the 12th cycle, 92% of patients receiving estradiol/norethisterone acetate patches were bleed-free. No additional hyperplasia was seen during the second year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous combined transdermal patch delivering 0.025 mg estradiol/day and 0.125 mg norethisterone acetate/day provided good endometrial protection. The dose maintained a consistently high rate of amenorrhea in postmenopausal women.     

Endometrial safety of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy with 17β-oestradiol (1 or 2 mg) and dydrogesterone

Objectives: To determine the endometrial safety of oral 17β-oestradiol combined continuously with dydrogesterone in preventing endometrial proliferation. Methods: The low dose group comprised three 52-week (13 cycles of 28 days) studies (two of which were double blind) using a 17β-oestradiol dose of 1 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg daily. The high dose group comprised two 24-week double-blind studies using a 17β-oestradiol dose of 2 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2.5, 5, 10 or 15 mg daily. Endometrial safety was verified by aspiration endometrial biopsies. Inadequate progestational response was defined as proliferative endometrium, endometrial polyp, hyperplasia and carcinoma. Results: Data was evaluable from 650 healthy postmenopausal women in the low dose group and 310 in the high dose group. Endometrial protection was achieved with dydrogesterone at doses of 5 mg or higher combined with 1 or 2 mg 17β-oestradiol. The success rate was 97%, 97% and 98% in women receiving 1/5, 1/10 and 1/20 mg, respectively, and 95%, 98% and 91% in women receiving 2/5, 2/10 and 2/15 mg, respectively. A lower success rate was achieved with the 2.5 mg dydrogesterone dosage (93% in the 1/2.5 mg group and 85% in the 2/2.5 mg group) due to more cases of proliferative endometrium. None of the women in the low dose group developed hyperplasia or carcinoma; five (0.7%) had endometrial polyps. In the high dose group, one woman given 2.5 mg dydrogesterone developed hyperplasia; there were no cases of carcinoma. Conclusion: 5 mg daily dydrogesterone appears to be the lowest effective dose to ensure endometrial safety in a continuous combined regimen with 1 or 2 mg 17β-oestradiol.     

Effects of ospemifene and raloxifene on hormonal status, lipids, genital tract, and tolerability in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: To compare ospemifene and raloxifene regarding their effects on hormones, lipids, genital tract, and tolerability in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind study in which 118 healthy postmenopausal women received 30 (n = 29), 60 (n = 30), or 90 mg (n = 30) of ospemifene or 60 mg (n = 29) of raloxifene for 3 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between study groups. In comparison with raloxifene, follicle-stimulating hormone levels decreased significantly more in the 90-mg ospemifene group and sex hormone-binding globulin levels increased more in all ospemifene groups. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased more in raloxifene than in ospemifene groups, although the difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol between 90-mg ospemifene and raloxifene was not significant. Endometrial thickness did not change in any study group and endometrial biopsies showed atrophy in the majority of subjects at 3 months. All ospemifene groups demonstrated a clear estrogenic effect on the vaginal epithelium, as seen in Pap smears. This was in sharp contrast to the raloxifene group, which had no effect on the vaginal epithelium. Kupperman index decreased in all study groups during treatment. The adverse events were mild, mainly single cases, and no clustering of events was observed. There were no clinically significant abnormal findings in laboratory safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Ospemifene, at the dose of 90 mg/day, was more estrogenic than raloxifene, as shown by changes in serum follicle-stimulating hormone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Neither agent stimulated endometrium, but in contrast to raloxifene, ospemifene had a clear estrogenic effect in the vagina. Further studies with ospemifene are needed in subjects with vaginal atrophy.     

心理干预降低原发性高血压患者降压药物剂量的临床研究

目的:临床观察心理干预能否降低原发性高血压病人降血压药物的剂量。方法:40例诊断为原发性高血压的病人,随机分为两组,试验组20例,给予非洛地平(波依定)2.5mg/天,辅以放松训练,每周2~3次,持续2月,定期复查血压及监督药物依从性;对照组20例,给予非洛地平5mg/天,观察2月,定期复查血压及药物依从性。观察两组病人短期血压控制情况。结果:2月后,试验组与对照组患者血压均控制良好,两者比较,无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:综合心理干预能降低高血压病人临床降压药物的使用剂量。     

Efficacy of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients with no baseline resistance-associated mutations to darunavir

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the potential of once-daily dosing with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in a HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patient population with no baseline darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). METHODS: Patients in the randomized controlled POWER 1 and 2 trials were treatment experienced, with > or =1 International AIDS Society-USA primary protease inhibitor (PI) mutation. The virological and immunological responses in patients with no baseline darunavir RAMs receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily (n = 23), darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily (n = 29), or currently available PI(s) (n = 28) plus an optimized background regimen were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 24 was 67% for the group receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and 62% for the group receiving darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily (P = 0.774); both were superior to control PI(s) (11%; P < 0.0001). Mean HIV RNA change from baseline was 22.39 and 22.35 log10 copies per milliliter for the group receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and for the group receiving 600/100 mg twice daily, respectively (P = 0.895); mean CD4 increases were 88 and 111 cells per milliliter, respectively (P = 0.526). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients with no baseline darunavir RAMs achieved similar high responses with darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and 600/100 mg twice daily. This suggests that once-daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg therapy, which has been shown effective in treatment-naive patients and is currently being studied in treatment-experienced patients, shows potential in patients with no darunavir RAMs.