腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果对比分析

目的 对比分析腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)和腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法 2019年1月～2020年12月我科行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝无张力修补手术的单侧腹股沟疝病人136例,按手术方式的不同分为TAPP组(70例)及TEP组(66例)。比较两组病人的手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间、住院费用、术后24小时疼痛评分(VSA)、术后首次排气时间、术后并发症发生率、术后半年复发情况。结果 TEP组术后首次排气时间、住院费用明显短于或少于TAPP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组病人手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间、术后24小时疼痛评分(VSA)、术后并发症发生率及术后半年复发情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 TAPP与TEP均是治疗腹股沟疝的安全有效术式,均能达到理想的手术效果,但TEP的手术费用更低,术后恢复快,临床可根据术者及病人的实际情况选择合适的手术方式。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝效果观察

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与开放式无张力疝修补术(OTFH)治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2019-02间商丘市立医院和虞城县人民医院收治的80例成人腹股沟疝患者,将38例接受OTFH术的患者作为对照组,将42例接受TEP术的患者作为腹腔镜组。比较2组的疗效及随访期间的复发情况。结果全部患者均顺利完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。腹腔镜组术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、并发症发生率均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后随访3个月～1 a期间,2组均未出现复发。结论 TEP术治疗成人腹股沟疝并发症少、术后康复快、安全、有效。     

腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术54例临床分析

目的总结腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术（TEP）经验和手术操作要点。方法选择我院行TEP手术54例患者,斜疝41例（其中5例为双侧斜疝）,直疝13例（其中4例为双侧直疝）。结果54例中有2例改行经腹腔腹膜外疝修补术。全组手术时间为40～130min,平均62min,术后住院3～7d,平均3．6d。术后给予镇痛剂0～4次,平均0．8次。术后腹股沟区慢性轻微疼痛2例。主要并发症有血清肿或血肿15例次。术后随访2～14个月无一例复发。结论rIEP手术安全可靠、复发率低,术后患者疼痛轻、康复快。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2018-10间收治的121例成人腹股沟疝患者,按手术方式的不同分为2组。对照组(60例)行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP),观察组(61例)实施腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)。比较2组的疗效。结果观察组术中失血量少于对照组,手术时间、住院时间、术后肛门恢复排气时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);2组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。随访6个月,2组患者均未出现复发病例。结论 TAPP和TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝均有确切效果,其中TEP创伤小,有利于患者术后恢复。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外免钉合腹股沟疝修补术45例

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外免钉合腹股沟疝修补术的可行性和安全性。方法 2007年1月~2010年3月我院对45例(52侧)腹股沟疝行腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术,用镜头替代气囊分离器分离腹膜前间隙,用预成形巴德3D Max补片无钉合固定。结果 45例手术全部成功,手术时间(65.8±21.8)min,术中出血量(15.3±4.6)ml,术后住院时间(2.7±1.2)d。术后阴囊血清肿1例,局部穿刺抽液3次及理疗1个月后治愈。45例随访1~38个月,平均15.6月,其中随访1年36例,未见复发及腹股沟区慢性疼痛等并发症。结论免钉合TEP是一种可行、安全、有效的无张力疝修补技术。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的扶镜技巧

【摘要】 目的 探讨在腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入手术中扶镜手的作用及相关技巧。方法 总结2010年11月至2012年05月时间段内我院进行的腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝补片植入术(TEP)中的扶镜经验(总共67例,其中包括斜疝43例,直疝22例,股疝2例)。结果 全部手术均顺利完成,无严重并发症。结论 了解术者操作习惯、了解TEP手术的特点及熟知手术步骤是配合术者进行手术的重要条件。     

连续1020例腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床体会

目的总结我科近3年来腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal prosthesis,TEP)的经验、教训。方法回顾性分析2011年4月至2014年3月期间我科收治的1 020例行腹腔镜TEP患者的临床资料。记录患者的进食时间、下床活动时间、手术时间、术后住院时间、总住院时间、住院费用、并发症出现的时间、疼痛评分等指标;统计分析不同疝分型并发症的发生率。结果 1 020例患者中腹股沟斜疝(单侧、双侧)810例,腹股沟直疝118例,股疝24例,复发疝68例。全部均基本顺利完成手术,其中有12例复发疝中转行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)。术后当天进食,术后第1 d可下床活动。手术时间单侧为(48±9.8)min,双侧为(65±8.6)min;术后住院时间0.5~2.0 d,总住院时间为(3.48±2.40)d;住院费用约为(8 958±1 685)元。本组患者前5位并发症依次为:血清肿61例(5.98%)、暂时性神经感觉异常48例(4.70%)、尿潴留23例(2.78%)、慢性疼痛9例(0.88%)及腹壁下动脉损伤5例(0.49%),无切口感染、内脏损伤、小肠梗阻等严重并发症发生。随访1年内无复发。对不同疝分型并发症总发生率进行比较,Ⅳ型疝并发症总发生率最高,从Ⅲ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅰ型依次降低(P0.001)。结论腹腔镜TEP是一种安全、技术合理的无张力疝修补手术,切口小,无腹腔干扰,疼痛轻,恢复正常活动早,但其缺点是技术难度大、费用较高。     

成人腹股沟疝腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术与开放无张力疝修补术的效果比较

目的比较成人腹股沟疝腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与开放无张力疝修补术的效果。方法选取2015-01—2018-01间在孟津县人民医院接受手术的100例腹股沟疝患者,按照术式不同分为2组,每组50例。腹腔镜组采取TEP,开放组实施开放式无张力疝修补术。结果 2组术中出血量及术后复发率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。腹腔镜组的手术时间和住院费用高于开放组;但其术后疼痛持续时间、术后并发症发生率及住院时间均优于开放组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 TEP和开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝均有较好的疗效,可根据患者的病情、经济条件、医院的设备及术者的经验等,综合进行分析,合理选择手术方式。     

完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝

近年来,由于腹腔镜技术的广泛应用及腹腔镜疝治疗技术的娴熟,腹腔镜疝修补术越来越普及,选择腹腔镜手术治疗的病人不断增多。我科行完全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal hernia repair,TEP)治疗复发的腹股沟疝,效果满意,现报道如下。资料与方法一、一般资料回顾我院2010年3月至2014年6月行TEP治疗51例     

腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术效果观察

目的观察腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的效果。方法随机将98例腹股沟疝患者分为2组,各49例。观察组行腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP),对照组实施Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术。结果观察组手术时间、术中失血量及术后VAS评分、下床时间、住院时间、切口美观满意度评分均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 TAPP和Lichtenstein术均有优点。可根据患者和术者的具体情况,个体化选择手术方式。     

开放TEP与传统前入路无张力修补腹股沟疝的比较

目的 比较传统前入路和开放式TEP无张力修补复发性腹股沟疝方法的手术疗效.方法 采用随机双盲对照方法,对165例腹股沟疝分别沿用传统前入路和开放式TEP术式行无张力修补方法,比较两组患者手术耗时、住院天数、平均恢复正常活动时间、治疗费用以及近/远期并发症和术后不适等指标,以评价开放式TEP术式修补腹股沟疝的疗效. 结果前入路组随访时间平均为(20.52±1.54)月,开放TEP组(21.63±1.76)月,完成随访率为98.79%.前入路3例1年后复发(3.66%),开放TEP组1例术后1年半后复发(1.22%),手术耗时、尿潴留率、平均住院天数、治疗费用、恢复正常活动时间和疝复发率均无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后腹股沟区疼痛、血清肿、阴囊水肿、切口感染、神经感觉异常和缺血性睾丸炎等近远期并发症开放TEP组明显少于前入路组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论开放TEP修补腹股沟疝可明显减少各种并发症和术后不适的发生率,疗效肯定,值得临床推广应用.     

开放TEP与传统前入路无张力修补腹股沟疝的比较

目的比较传统前入路和开放式TEP无张力修补腹股沟疝方法的手术疗效。方法采用随机双盲对照方法,对165例腹股沟疝患者分别沿用传统前入路和开放式TEP术式行无张力修补方法,比较两组患者手术时间、住院天数、平均恢复正常活动时间、治疗费用以及近、远期并发症和术后不适等指标,以评价开放式TEP术式修补腹股沟疝的疗效。结果前入路组随访时间平均为(20.5±1.5)个月,开放TEP组(21.6±1.8)个月,完成随访率为98.79%。前入路3例1年后复发(3.66%),开放TEP组1例术后1年半后复发(1.20%),手术时间、平均住院天数、治疗费用、恢复正常活动时间、疝复发率和尿潴留发生率等均无明显差异(P0.05);术后腹股沟区疼痛、血清肿、阴囊水肿、切口感染、神经感觉异常和缺血性睾丸炎等近、远期并发症开放TEP组明显少于前入路组,两组间差异有显著意义(P0.05)结论开放TEP修补腹股沟疝可明显减少各种并发症和术后不适的发生率,疗效肯定,值得临床推广应用。     

Safety and efficacy of single incision laparoscopic surgery for total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Almost 20 years after the first laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was performed, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) is set to revolutionize minimally invasive surgery. However, the loss of triangulation must be overcome before the technique can be popularized. This study reports the first 100 laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repairs using a single incision. The study cohort comprised 68 patients with a mean age of 44 (range, 18 to 83): 36 unilateral and 32 bilateral hernias. Twelve patients also underwent umbilical hernia repair with the Ventralex patch requiring no additional incisions. A 2.5-cm to 3-cm crescentic incision within the confines of the umbilicus was performed. Standard dissecting instruments and 52-cm/5.5-mm/30⁰ laparoscope were used. Operation times were 50 minutes for unilateral and 80 minutes for bilateral. There was one conversion to conventional 3-port laparoscopic repair and none to open surgery. Outpatient surgery was achieved in all (except one). Analgesic requirements were minimal: 8 Dextropropoxyphene tablets (range, 0 to 20). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications with a high patient satisfaction score. Single-incision laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and efficient simply by modifying dissection techniques (so-called “inline” and “vertical”). Comparable success can be obtained while negating the risks of bowel and vascular injuries from sharp trocars and achieving improved cosmetic results.     

Intestinal obstruction after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Laparoscopic hernia repair is a frequently performed operation. Although it has many advantages over open inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic surgery is not without complications. Small bowel obstruction is a complication unique to laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias. It is reported following transabdominal preperitoneal repairs. We present a case of small bowel incarceration through a peritoneal defect after a totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Techniques to avoid this complication are presented. The literature is reviewed.     

Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice

Background: Although the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach to hernia repair has been associated with less pain and a faster postoperative recovery than traditional open repair, many practicing surgeons have been reluctant to adopt this technique because of the lengthy operative times and the learning curve for this procedure. Methods: Data from all patients undergoing TEP repair since 1997 and open mesh repair (OPEN) since 1999 were collected prospectively. Selection of surgical approach was based on local hernia factors, anesthetic risk, previous abdominal surgery, and patient preference. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests. Data are mean ± SD. Results: TEP repairs were performed in 147 patients and open repairs in 198 patients. Patients in the OPEN group were significantly older (59 ± 19 years OPEN vs 51 ± 13 years TEP) and had a higher ASA (1.9 ± 0.7 OPEN vs 1.5 ± 0.6 TEP; p < 0.01). TEP repairs were more likely to be carried out for bilateral (33% TEP, 5% OPEN) or recurrent hernias (31% TEP, 11% OPEN) than were open repairs (p < 0.01). Concurrent procedures accompanied 31% of TEP and 12% of OPEN repairs (p < 0.01). Operative times (min) were significantly shorter in the TEP group for both unilateral (63 ± 22 TEP, 70 ± 20 OPEN; p = 0.02) and bilateral (78 ± 27 TEP, 102 ± 27 OPEN; p = 0.01) repairs. Mean operative times decreased over time in the TEP group for both unilateral and bilateral repairs (p < 0.01). Patients undergoing TEP were more likely (p < 0.01) to develop urinary retention (7.9% TEP, 1.1% OPEN), but were less likely (p < 0.01) to have skin numbness (2.8% TEP, 35.8% OPEN) or prolonged groin discomfort (1.4% TEP, 5.3% OPEN). Conclusions: Despite a higher proportion of patients undergoing bilateral repairs, recurrent hernia repair, and concurrent procedures, operative times are shorter for laparoscopic TEP repair than for open mesh repair. TEP repairs can be performed efficiently and without major complications, even when the learning curve is included. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, March 2003, Los Angeles, CA, USA     

传统与无张力腹股沟疝修补术疗效对比

目的探讨无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝中的应用价值及疗效观察。方法共有106例腹股沟疝患者,随机分成传统组和无张力组,比较2组的疗效。结果采用无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝在手术时间、住院时间、以及切口疼痛等方面优于传统腹股沟疝修补术。结论无张力疝修补术可以安全、有效地应用于临床。     

Pneumomediastinum as a complication of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

A 52-year-old man with left indirect groin hernia was admitted for elective inguinal repair using the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. After an uneventful intubation, TEP repair of the hernia was performed with three midline trocars. Immediately after extubation, the patient noted severe chest pain. There was a decrease in PaO2 saturation, and neck subcutaneous emphysema was detected. There was no emphysema of the abdomen or of the back. A chest film and thoracic computed tomographic (CT) scan confirmed the presence of pneumomediastinum without pneumothorax. The patient was discharged without complications.     

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair versus anterior preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is still not the gold standard for repair although mesh implantation is unequivocally accepted as an integral part of any groin hernia repair. The aim of the study was to compare the results of anterior preperitoneal (APP) mesh repair with totally extra peritoneal (TEP) repair for inguinal hernias. The prospective study was conducted on 241 patients with 247 hernias (from January 2000 to June 2004). Anterior preperitoneal repair was done in 121 patients and 120 patients were subjected to TEP repair. Repair in both groups was done by using Prolene mesh of size 6×4 in. or 6×6 in. intraoperative and postoperative parameters and complications were recorded and the patients were followed up to 1 year post-surgery. For both unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernias, mean operative time was significantly more in patients of TEP repair as compared to APP repair (P<0.001) and significantly more patients had peritoneal tears in the TEP group (P<0.001). Patients undergoing TEP repair, however, had significantly less postoperative pain (P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) and return to work was significantly earlier is this group (P<0.01 and P<0.001). There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups. Patients with inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly, and have less incidence of postoperative pain. But it takes significantly more time to perform than APP repair and also the incidence of peritoneal tear is higher.     

���������޲����ڸ��ɹ��������е�Ӧ��

目的探讨无张力疝修补术在腹股沟复发疝中的临床应用价值。方法自2000年8月至2003年5月应用无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝病人52例,其中应用疝环填充法38例,三合一补片法14例,观察手术时间、伤口疼痛、术后自主功能的恢复、并发症及复发率。结果手术全部成功完成,平均手术时间50min,术后4例出现尿潴留,5例出现阴囊积液。术后5～7d出院,随访3～36个月未见复发病例。结论无张力疝修补术是治疗腹股沟复发疝的理想术式,具有手术安全、创伤小、痛苦小、术后恢复快、近期疗效满意和复发率低等优点,手术方式应“个体化”。     

The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair

Background: The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair has become our procedure of choice to manage inguinal hernia in adult patients since March 1993. This technique was developed in an attempt to diminish post-operative pain, shorten the convalescence period and equal the recurrence figures of the classical tension-free repair. Methods: A complete extraperitoneal dissection is performed. A large Marlex prosthesis (15×15 cm) is placed and covers all potential defects. Results: A consecutive series of 195 hernias in 158 patients is proposed. The minimum follow-up in our series is at least 6 months. Morbidity is low and so far, no recurrences have been seen. Conclusions: The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach for repairing inguinal hernia should have a promising future, because the same principles as the classical tension-free repair are followed. Preliminary results are promising. Further studies, even randomized prospective trials and fair reports of complications, will determine the future of laparoscopic hernia surgery.