Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: disease progression and survival analysis from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of darbepoetin alfa (DA) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two 16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studies of weekly DA in anemic patients with lung cancer (n = 314) or lymphoproliferative malignancies (LPMs; n = 344) undergoing chemotherapy were analyzed with prospectively defined long-term PFS and OS end points. Short-term effects of DA on PFS and OS were analyzed by including two additional 16-week dose-finding, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in anemic patients with multiple tumor types (n = 405) and LPMs (n = 66). RESULTS: Median follow-up is 15.8 months (lung cancer) and 32.6 months (LPM). Median duration of PFS was comparable between DA and placebo: 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 6.9 months) versus 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.3 months) for lung cancer and 14.2 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 17.5 months) versus 15.9 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 19.0 months) for LPMs. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) of death related to DA use for lung cancer was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.01) and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.71) for LPMs. In the pooled analyses of all four studies (n = 1,129), no differences in PFS or OS were observed between DA and placebo (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.07; and HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.16, respectively). CONCLUSION: Treatment with DA does not seem to influence PFS or OS in patients with CIA. Prospective, randomized clinical trials will provide additional insights into the effects of DA on PFS and OS in specific tumor types.     

Role of exclusive chemotherapy as first line treatment in oligodendroglioma

PURPOSE: The optimal therapy of oligodendrogliomas remains uncertain. Although chemosensitive, these tumors are not chemocurable. We investigated whether chemotherapy delays the need for radiation therapy (RT) without decreasing length and quality of survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among 89 patients treated for oligodendrogliomas at the Centre Léon Bérard of Lyon from 1982 to 1999, 59 patients fitted inclusion criteria, having had centrally reviewed pure oligodendroglioma requiring treatment. According to the WHO's classification 35 patients had Grade III and 24, Grade II oligodendrogliomas. RESULTS: According to the intent to treat, patients were retrospectively classified in three groups as exclusive RT (Group 1), radio-chemotherapy (Group 2), or exclusive chemotherapy (Group 3). Median progression-free survival (PFS): was 47 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 39-56], and median overall survival (OS) was 109 months (95% CI 83-134). In univariate analysis, PFS was correlated with frontal location and WHO classification; OS was correlated with frontal location and Post-operative Karnosky performans status both appearing as independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups with regard to PFS (P = 0.82) and OS (P = 0.64). In the group of patients treated with exclusive chemotherapy the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 44 and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Front-line exclusive chemotherapy results in prolonged OS in patients with confirmed pure oligodendroglioma. Whether this strategy improves quality of life remains debatable.     

Second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the RIBBON-2 trial

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) typically have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. To determine the impact of combining bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 RIBBON-2 trial. RIBBON-2 enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on first-line non-bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. After selection of chemotherapy (taxane, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine), patients were randomized 2:1 to receive chemotherapy with either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Of 684 patients treated in RIBBON-2, 159 (23%) had TNBC. Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced in the two treatment groups. The majority received taxane chemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.494 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.74; P = 0.0006]. Median PFS was 6.0 months with bevacizumab-chemotherapy versus 2.7 months with chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 17.9 versus 12.6 months, respectively (HR 0.624, 95% CI 0.39-1.007; P = 0.0534). ORR was 41 versus 18%, respectively (P = 0.0078). The safety profile was consistent with the overall study population and previous phase 3 trials of bevacizumab. Patients with metastatic TNBC derived significant PFS and response benefits from the combination of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy. Despite the small sample size and immature data, there was a trend toward improved OS.     

Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Platinum-based doublets are recommended as treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, chemotherapy must be tailored to limit side effects. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with docetaxel for NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV, chemotherapy-naive NSCLC received docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2), and pegfilgrastim 6 mg every 21 days for up to six cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were treated; 93% had stage IV disease and 28% had brain metastases. In 27 evaluable patients with follow-up, there were 10 partial responses for an ORR of 37% (90% confidence interval [CI], 22-55%). Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.6-6.5 months); 12-month PFS was 14.8% (95% CI, 3.4-34.0%). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.9-16.8 months); 12-month OS was 40% (95% CI, 19-61%) and 18-month OS was 16% (95% CI, 1-46%). In 29 treated patients, there were no unusual or unexpected adverse events. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were anemia (14% of patients) and hyperglycemia (10%); there were only two reports of neutropenia; both were grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: These phase II findings suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel is active and well tolerated, and should be further investigated as a feasible treatment alternative for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

Uterine Sarcoma: Clinical Presentation,Treatment and Survival Outcomes in Thailand

Background: Uterine sarcoma is a group of rare gynecologic tumors with various natures, and different lines of treatment. Most have a poor treatment outcome. This study targeted clinical characteristics, treatment, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors in uterine sarcoma patients in one tertiary center for cancer care. Materials and Methods: Uterine sarcoma patients who were treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital between January 1994 and December 2014 were identified. Clinico-pathological data were analyzed. Prognostic outcomes were examined by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Results: We identified 46 uterine sarcoma patients: 25 carcinosarcoma (CS) (54.3%), 15 leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (32.6%), and 6 undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) (13.1%) cases. Mean age was 54.011.9 years (range 25-82 years). Abnormal uterine bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (63.0%). Among 33 patients (71.7%) who had pre-operative tissue collected, diagnosis of malignancy was correct in 29 (87.9%). All patients received primary surgery and retroperitoneal lymph nodes were resected in 34 (73.9%). After surgery, 5 (10.9%) had gross residual tumors. Stage I disease was most commonly found (56.5%). Adjuvant treatment was given to 27 (58.7%), most commonly chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 16.0 months (range 0.8-187.4 months), recurrence was encountered in 22 patients (47.8%). Median time to recurrence was 5.8 months (range1.0-105.5 months). Distant metastasis was more common than local or loco- regional failure. The 2-year PFS was 45.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.6%-59.7%) and the 2-year OS was 48.3% (95% CI, 33.3%-60.7%). Multivariable analyses found residual disease after surgery as a significant factor only for PFS. Conclusions: Uterine sarcoma is a rare tumor entity. Even with multimodalities of treatment, the prognosis is still poor. Successful cytoreductive surgery is a key factor for a good survival outcome.     

A multi-center phase II study of nintedanib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China

Purpose: This study examined the efficacy and safety of using nintedanib as single-regimen in 2^nd-line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with advanced (beyond stage IIIB) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Chinese patients were those with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and had unsuccessful 1^st-line platinum based chemotherapy. Patients received two oral intakes of 200 mg nintedanib everyday from day 1 to day 21, on every 4-week cycle. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and disease control rate. Results: There were 62 eligible patients enrolled in the study. Half of the patients were male (n = 31, 50.0%). The median age was 64.2 years with youngest age of 33 years and oldest age of 83 years. Median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.4 months). Median OS was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.8-10.1 months). No patients (0.0%) had complete response. Thirty-one patients (50.0%) had stable disease and 23 patients (37.1%) had partial response. The most common severe adverse events (AEs), graded as 3 or 4, were heart failure (n = 12, 19.4%), hypertension (n = 7, 11.8%) and diarrhea (n = 6, 9.8%). Conclusion: NSCLC Patients in 2^nd-line chemotherapy reached similar PFS, as compared with other FDA-approved second-line regimens. Also, the toxicity of nintedanib was well tolerated. Thus, nintedanib may be used as a standard regimen for 2^nd-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

First-line bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: pooled and subgroup analyses of data from 2447 patients

BackgroundBevacizumab has consistently demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate when combined with first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the lack of a significant overall survival (OS) difference continues to attract debate, and identification of patients deriving greatest benefit from bevacizumab remains elusive.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from three randomised phase III trials in the first-line HER2-negative mBC setting were analysed, focusing specifically on efficacy in poor-prognosis patients.ResultsThe meta-analysis (n = 2447) demonstrated a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.71; median 9.2 months with bevacizumab versus 6.7 months with non-bevacizumab therapy) and response rate of 49% versus 32%, respectively. The OS HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.86–1.08); median 26.7 versus 26.4 months, respectively. In patients with triple-negative mBC, the HRs for PFS and OS were 0.63 (95% CI 0.52–0.76) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.79–1.16), respectively. Median PFS was 8.1 months with bevacizumab versus 5.4 months with chemotherapy alone, median OS was 18.9 versus 17.5 months, respectively, and 1-year OS rates were 71% versus 65%.ConclusionsBevacizumab improves efficacy, including 1-year OS rates, both overall and in subgroups of poor-prognosis patients with limited treatment options.     

Panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil as anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in patients with refractory RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Overall survival and subgroup analysis of the randomized phase II VELO trial

The randomized phase II VELO trial showed that the addition of panitumumab to trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line therapy in patients with refractory RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With longer follow-up, final overall survival results and posttreatment subgroup analysis are presented. Sixty-two patients with refractory RAS WT mCRC were randomly assigned to receive, as third-line therapy, trifluridine/tipiracil alone (arm A) or in combination with panitumumab (arm B). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.5-16.7) in arm A compared to 11.6 months (95% CI 6.3-17.0) in arm B (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.54-1.71, P = .9). To evaluate the impact of subsequent lines of treatment, subgroup analysis was performed for the 24/30 patients in arm A, that received fourth-line therapy after disease progression. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 1.44-6.83) for 17 patients treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge as compared to 3.0 months (95% CI 1.61-4.31) for seven patients that received other therapies (HR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.85, P = .024). Median OS from the start of fourth-line treatment was 13.6 months (95% CI 7.2-20), and 5.1 months (95% CI 1.8-8.3) for patients treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge vs other therapies, respectively (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.81, P = .019). Final results of the VELO trial support the role of anti-EGFR rechallenge in the continuum of care of patients with RAS/BRAF WT mCRC.     

Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms in the ABCB1 Gene onClinical Outcomes in Patients with Gastric Cancer Treated bySecond-line Chemotherapy

Objective: Tumor cells that overexpress P-glycoprotein (Pgp) may be resistant to several anticancer agentsdue to altered pharmacokinetics and reduced intracellular concentrations of the anticancer agents. Pgp is encodedby the ATP binding cassette gene B1 (ABCB1). To our knowledge, only one previous report has evaluated theeffect of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms on clinical outcomes of gastric cancer. The purpose of this analysis was toevaluate the impact of genetic polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene on clinical outcomes in patients with advancedgastric cancer (AGC) treated with second-line chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the impactof ABCB1 gene polymorphisms (ABCB1 3435C>T) on clinical outcomes in 100 patients with AGC who receivedsecond-line chemotherapy. Results: Median overall survival (OS) since the initiation of second-line chemotherapywas 6.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8 to 8.0 months), and median progression-free survival (PFS)was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 3.4 months). In a multivariate analysis of PFS, a 3435 CC polymorphism (n =45) was significantly associated with longer PFS compared with the CT/TT type polymorphism (n = 55), withborderline significance (PFS of 3.2 months vs. 2.2 months, respectively; HR 1.50; 95% CI, 0.98-2.30; P = 0.061).ABCB1 3435 C>T polymorphisms were not associated with OS. No interaction was seen between ABCB1polymorphisms and treatment regimens. Conclusion: Genetic polymorphisms of ABCB1 3435C>T might havea possible impact on clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in AGC. Further prospective evaluationusing a larger sample size is required.     

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in KEYNOTE-407

The global phase III KEYNOTE-407 (NCT02775435) trial showed that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present outcomes of patients from Japan enrolled in KEYNOTE-407. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo with paclitaxel 200 mg/m² every 3 weeks (Q3W) or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² (weekly) plus carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL/min Q3W for four cycles, followed by pembrolizumab or placebo Q3W for a total of 35 cycles. Primary end-points were OS and PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Fifty patients were randomized at Japanese sites (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 22; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 28). Median follow-up time at data cut-off (May 9, 2019) was 15.1 (range, 0.5–24.0) months. Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 17.3 (12.5–not reached) versus 11.0 (8.6–19.5) months in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27–1.15). Median PFS (95% CI) was 8.3 (6.1–13.0) versus 7.2 (3.9–8.8) months (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35–1.23). Grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 86% and 75% of patients, respectively. There were three fatal AEs, two of which were treatment-related (one from each treatment group, pneumonitis and pulmonary hemorrhage). Efficacy and safety outcomes were consistent with the global study and support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.     

Clinical Outcomes With Pembrolizumab-Based Therapies in Recurrent/Refractory NSCLC After Chemoradiation and Consolidative Durvalumab

BackgroundOften, patients with NSCLC experience recurrent/refractory (R/R) disease within 2 years of chemoradiation (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab. Despite prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure, immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy is typically initiated if a driver-oncogene is absent. However, there remains a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in this patient population. Here, we present survival outcomes associated with pembrolizumab for R/R NSCLC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively assessed adults with NSCLC who received pembrolizumab for R/R disease between January 2016 to January 2023. Primary objective was to estimate OS and PFS in this cohort compared to historical outcomes. Secondary objective was to compare OS and PFS among subgroups.ResultsFifty patients were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 11.3 months (2.9-38.2). OS was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.8-19.2); 1-year OS rate 49% (95% CI, 36 - 67%). PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.7-9.0); 1-year PFS rate 25% (95% CI, 15%-42%). Current smokers had significantly better median OS/PFS as compared to former smokers (NA vs. 10.5 and 9.9 vs. 6.0 months, respectively). The addition of chemotherapy demonstrated an OS benefit (median OS 12.9 vs. 6.0 months) but was not statistically significant.ConclusionPatients with R/R NSCLC represent a distinct cohort with inferior survival outcomes when compared to those with de novo stage IV disease treated with pembrolizumab-based regimens. Based on our findings, we recommend oncologists exercise caution when considering checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in the front-line setting for R/R NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression.     

Predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma of the elderly

O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation identifies a subpopulation of glioblastoma patients with more favorable prognosis and predicts a benefit from alkylating agent chemotherapy (CT). Little is known about its prevalence and clinical significance in older glioblastoma patients. We studied 233 glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more (144 males, 89 females, median age: 74 years, range: 70.0-86.6 years), who were prospectively enrolled in the German Glioma Network, for MGMT promoter methylation by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in all patients and DNA pyrosequencing in 166 patients. MGMT data were correlated with patient outcome. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months (95% CI: 4.3-5.3) and median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.0). MGMT promoter methylation was detected by MSP in 134 patients (57.5%). For the whole cohort, PFS was 5.2 versus 4.7 months (p = 0.207) and OS was 8.4 versus 6.4 months (p = 0.031) in patients with versus without MGMT promoter methylation. Patients with MGMT methylated tumors had longer PFS when treated with radiotherapy (RT) plus CT or CT alone compared to patients treated with RT alone. Patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors appeared to derive no survival benefit from CT, regardless of whether given at diagnosis together with RT or as a salvage treatment. Patients treated with RT plus CT or CT alone demonstrated longer OS when pyrosequencing revealed >25% MGMT methylated alleles. Taken together, MGMT promoter methylation may be a useful biomarker to stratify elderly glioblastoma patients for treatment with versus without alkylating agent CT.     

Safety and Management of Toxicity Related to Aflibercept in Combination with Fluorouracil,Leucovorin and Irinotecan in Malaysian Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background: Between October 2012 and February 2015, 25 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (mean age, 57.0 12.1 years) were granted access to aflibercept via the Aflibercept Named Patient Program at four centers. Materials and Methods: Here we reported the initial experience of aflibercept / FOLFIRI in combination. We evaluated treatment-related adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The majority of the patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 1-2), with diarrhea (52%), mucositis (52%), and nausea/vomiting (20%) being largely observed. Neutropenia (16%) and febrile neutropenia (8%) were common grade 3-4 hematological events. Aflibercept-related toxicity was managed as per practice guidelines. No grade 5 event was reported. Median PFS was 6.12 months (95% CI, 4.80-7.20) and OS was 12 months (95% CI, 9.80-14.18). The partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) rates were 25% (95% CI: 23.4-27.0), 37.5% (95% CI: 31.6-43.3), and 37.5% (95% CI: 22.5-52.5), respectively. Conclusions: Aflibercept/FOLFIRI can be administered safely in a second line setting to Malaysian patients with mCRC, as the AEs experienced were generally reversible and manageable. The safety and efficacy outcomes were consistent with those observed in Western populations.     

Approval summary: erlotinib maintenance therapy of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

On April 16, 2010, the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved erlotinib tablets (Tarceva®; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Melville, NY) for maintenance treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease had not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.In total, 889 patients received either erlotinib (150 mg) or placebo once daily. Progression-free survival (PFS), in all patients and in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)⁺ tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC), was the primary efficacy endpoint. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary sponsor endpoint but was the primary regulatory endpoint.Median PFS times were 2.8 months and 2.6 months in the erlotinib and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.82; p < .001). Median OS times were 12.0 months and 11.0 months, favoring erlotinib (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.95). The PFS and OS HRs in patients with EGFR⁺ tumors by IHC were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58–0.82) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64–0.93), respectively. The PFS and OS HRs in patients with EGFR⁻ tumors by IHC were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.51–1.14) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.59–1.38), respectively.Following disease progression, 57% of placebo-treated patients received additional chemotherapy, compared with 47% of erlotinib-treated patients. Fourteen percent of placebo-treated patients received erlotinib or gefitinib, 31% received docetaxel, and 14% received pemetrexed. In total, 59% of placebo-treated patients who received treatment received FDA approved second-line NSCLC drugs.The most common adverse reactions in patients receiving erlotinib were rash and diarrhea.     

High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy

Because of improved therapeutic results after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may be considered for a growing number of patients. Approximately, 10% of patients have an interval time after concluding first-line platinum-based chemotherapy greater than 6 months. These patients may achieve high tumor responses when platinum is again used in second-line treatment. Twenty-three patients experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy were managed with second-line treatment with carboplatin combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after initiation of second-line treatment were calculated for all patients. Median PFS after first-line treatment was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.4–14.7 months). Partial response was achieved in 7 of 23 patients, resulting in an overall response of 30.4% (95% CI, 11.6–49.0). Following initiation of second-line chemotherapy, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1–10.9 months) and median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI, 3.5–21.5 months). The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 61.0% (95% CI, 29.5–82.0). Adding these results to those of the 10 previously published trials, 75 of 326 patients, 23%, (95% CI, 18.7–27.3) presented an overall response with the use of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of platinum combinations as second-line chemotherapy seems to have a place in the management of patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those with an interval time to progression greater than 6 months.     

First-line treatment with sunitinib for type 1 and type 2 locally advanced or metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: a phase II study (SUPAP) by the French Genitourinary Group (GETUG)

BackgroundPapillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), type 1 and type 2, represents 10%–15% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC). There is no standard first-line treatment of metastatic PRCC (mPRCC). Anti-angiogenics have shown activity in retrospective studies but no prospective studies in pure papillary histology have been reported, but one with foretinib.Patients and methodsA prospective phase II study evaluated sunitinib in first-line treatment of mPRCC. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsFifteen and 46 patients, respectively, with type 1 and type 2 mPRCC were enrolled. Using the MSKCC scoring system: 12 (20%), 33 (55%) and 9 (15%) patients were, respectively, in the favourable, intermediate or poor risk group and 7 undetermined. Median follow-up is 51.4 months. In type 1, 2 patients 13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1–30.5] had a partial response (PR), 10 had stable disease (SD) with 5 (33%) ≥12 weeks. In type 2, 5 patients 11% (95% CI 1.9–20.3) had a PR, 25 had SD with 10(22%) ≥12 weeks. Median PFS was 6.6 months (95% CI 2.8–14.8) in type 1 and 5.5 months (95% CI 3.8–7.1) in type 2. Median OS was 17.8 (95% CI 5.7–26.1) and 12.4 (95% CI 8.2–14.3) months, respectively, in type 1 and 2. Safety was as expected with sunitinib for metastatic RCC.ConclusionSunitinib showed activity in treatment of type 1 and 2 mPRCC but lower than in clear-cell mRCC. Both PFS and OS are longer in type I PRCC. Sunitinib represents an acceptable option in first-line treatment of mPRCC.     

Bevacizumab in Combination with Metronomic Chemotherapy in Patients with Anthracycline- and Taxane-Refractory Breast Cancer

Abstract

A vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor might enhance metronomic chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Anthra-cycline and taxane refractory MBC patients were given cyclophosphamide 50 mg p.o. daily, methotrexate 1 mg/kg i.v. every 14 days, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. every 14 days. Trastuzumab was added in HER2-overexpressing tumors. 24 patients were enrolled and 22 were evaluable. All tumors had histologic grade II-III and most patients had ≥2 metastatic sites. After a median follow-up of 7.7 months the response rates were: complete response (CR) 0%, partial response (PR) 31.8% (95% CI 13.9-54.9%), stable disease for ≥24 weeks (SD) 31.8% (95% CI 13.9-54.9%). Clinical benefit (CB= CR + PR + SD>24w) 63.6% (95% CI 40.7-82.8%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months; overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months. HER2-overex-pressing or high proliferative-index tumors had better 6-month PFS (75% vs. 34% in HER-negative tumors P= 0.043; 67% vs. 0% in Ki-67 ≥20% tumors, P = 0.015). Adverse effects were mild. The combination of bevacizumab and a metronomic-based chemotherapy was effective, well tolerated and provided clinical benefit in heavily-treated MBC patients.     

592例食管癌3DRT的预后分析

目的 分析食管癌3DRT (3DCRT、IMRT)疗效和预后影响因素。方法 2002—2012年间本院接受3DRT食管癌患者592例,其中3DCRT者123例、IMRT 者469例,单纯放疗360例、放化疗232例。中位放疗剂量60 Gy。Kaplan-Meier法计算OS、PFS并Logrank法检验和单因素预后分析,Cox法多因素预后分析。结果 3、5年样本数分别为142、53例。1、3、5年OS和PFS率分别为65.3%、34.0%、23.5%和52.1%、28.0%、19.6%。中位OS时间20个月(95%CI为17.9~22.1个月),中位PFS时间14个月(95%CI为11.8~16.2个月)。单因素分析显示影响OS和PFS因素有性别、N分期、M分期、TNM分期、放疗剂量、治疗前体重下降、吸烟和饮酒(P=0.002和0.000、0.000和0.000、0.001和0.000、0.000和0.000、0.000和0.000、0.024和0.026、0.009和0.005、0.000和0.000)。多因素分析显示TNM分期、放疗剂量和性别是影响OS、PFS因素(P=0.000和0.000、0.000和0.001、0.036和0.027)。结论 食管癌3DRT的生存有所提高,临床TNM分期、放疗剂量和性别是影响生存的因素。     

Mucinous histology predicts for reduced fluorouracil responsiveness and survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous carcinoma of the colon and rectum (mucinous CRC) is a histological subtype of colorectal adenocarcinoma for which there is little data on chemotherapy responsiveness. The purpose of this study was to investigate specifically the efficacy of fluorouracil-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced mucinous CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with advanced mucinous CRC enrolled in three prospective randomized trials evaluating infused 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment were compared with patients with non-mucinous subtypes enrolled in the same trials in a case-control study. Prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: The study included 135 patients (45 cases and 90 controls). The response rates for cases and controls were 22% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11% to 38%] and 47% (95% CI, 36.1% to 58.2%), respectively (P=0.0058). Median OS for the mucinous CRC patients was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.87-14.8) compared with 17.9 months (95% CI, 13.38-22.39) in the control group (univariate analysis, P=0.056); after correcting for significant prognostic factors by multivariate Cox regression analysis, P=0.0372 and hazard ratio (HR)=1.497 (1.02-2.19). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced mucinous CRC have a poorer response to fluorouracil-based first-line chemotherapy and reduced survival compared with patients with non-mucinous CRC.     

Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens: a multicenter observational cohort study (TCTG 2nd-BV study)

The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as the second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been fully clarified, although bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the second-line setting has demonstrated a survival benefit. We investigated the efficacy of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in mCRC patients who failed oxaliplatin-containing regimens without bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or bevacizumab plus FOLFOX as second-line chemotherapy between July 2007 and March 2008 were registered (trial registration: UMIN000001547). Patient background data and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response, and bevacizumab-related adverse events were prospectively collected every 6?months. A total of 195 patients were enrolled from 26 institutions. Among them, 115 patients received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI after failure of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU group), and 45 patients received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX after failure of irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU group). Median PFS was 8.3?months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-9.9) for the FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU group and 7.8?months (95% CI, 5.8-9.7) for the FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU group. Median OS was 21.6?months (95% CI, 17.6-25.6) and 16.5?months (95% CI, 11.8-21.2), respectively. Overall response rates were 25 and 29%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 bevacizumab-related adverse events were hypertension (5.0%) and bleeding (3.8%). FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU showed comparable efficacy to FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU.