Phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and tegafur/uracil for metastatic colorectal cancer

Irinotecan combined with continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has been shown to be an effective and tolerable regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Tegafur/uracil (UFT) during 5FU infusion enhances plasma 5FU concentration, mimics continuous 5FU infusion and delivers the drug to target tumor cells. We conducted a phase II trial of four-agent combined therapy for MCRC, giving patients (pts) intravenous irinotecan (30 mg/m2 on day 1), leucovorin (LV, 200 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2), 5FU (300 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2), and UFT (400 mg/day for 14 days). The main endpoint was the objective tumor response rate. Sixteen pts with a good performance status were enrolled from February 2001 to May 2002. The response rate was 19% (3 partial responses), and 13 pts had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5.2 months, and the median survival time was 20.2 months. Considering the low toxicity and reasonable cost, this regimen deserves further investigation.     

Phase II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This nonrandomized open label phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, aged 18-70 years, performance status zero to two, no prior chemotherapy, and with signed written informed consent were eligible. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 150 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 100 mg/m2 day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 as a 48-h continuous infusion starting on day 1, which was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: From August 2004 to August 2005, 48 patients were prospectively enrolled. The median age was 54 years (24-69). In total, 386 cycles were administered with a median of nine cycles per patient (range 1-12 cycles) and 45 of 48 patients were assessable for treatment response. An independent review of tumor responses resulted in overall response rate of 66.7% (95% confidence interval=53.4% to 80.0%) by intent-to-treat analysis with one complete response and 31 partial responses. The median survival of all patients was 14.8 months and the median time to progression was 9.6 months. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (12% of all cycles) and emesis (8% of all cycles). Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy occurred in five patients. One (2%) patient had severe tumor bleeding and five (10%) patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: The modified FOLFOXIRI combination chemotherapy showed a very promising preliminary antitumor activity and was generally well tolerated as a first-line treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer.     

An alternating regimen of irinotecan/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer: a Phase II trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and activity of a combination schedule with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (L-OHP), brief infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) patients. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients were treated with CPT-11 125 mg/m2 as a 90-min intravenous infusion, followed by FA 20 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 over a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8. L-OHP was administered at 85 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 15, in combination with a FA 60 mg/m2 intravenous bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 15-16. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 50 assessable patients achieved a complete (n=5) or partial (n=20) response, leading to a response rate of 50% (95% CI 35-64%). Eighteen (36%) patients showed stable disease. The median time to tumor progression was 10.3 months (95% CI 9.6-10.9 months). After a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median survival was not reached. Grade 3 neutropenia (8%), grade 3 nausea/vomiting (6%) and grade 3 diarrhea (2%) were the major adverse events. CONCLUSION: This alternating three-drug regimen is very well tolerated, manageable and effective in terms of activity and time to progression.     

伊立替康或奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶及亚叶酸钙治疗晚期大肠癌

 目的　观察并比较伊立替康联合5-氟尿嘧啶（5-Fu）及亚叶酸钙（CF）与奥沙利铂（L-OHP）联合5-Fu+CF治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效及患者不良反应。方法　随机将晚期大肠癌患者分为两组：伊立替康联合5-Fu+CF组（A组）24例，L-OHP联合5-Fu+CF（B组）25例。每例患者至少完成2个周期以上的化疗。结果　A组：有效（CR+PR）率33.3 %，中位缓解期5.0个月，中位生存期12.4个月。B组：有效率40.0 %，中位缓解期5.3个月，中位生存期14.4个月。A组的延迟性腹泻的发生率为32.0 %， B组周围神经毒性发生率为64.0 %；其他不良反应为骨髓抑制和恶心、呕吐等，两组发生率相近。 结论　伊立替康联合5-Fu+CF与L-OHP联合5-Fu+CF两方案治疗晚期大肠癌疗效相当，患者不良反应均可耐受。     

Phase II study of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a modified biweekly irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin regimen (modified Douillard regimen) as the first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 80 patients (41 male, 39 female) with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled between April 2001 and December 2003. The treatment cycle consisted of irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) as a 90 min infusion on day 1, leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus, immediately followed by a 48 h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 3000 mg/m(2) on day 1. The primary end-point was response rate, and the secondary end-points were time to progression and toxicity profile. RESULTS: An overall objective response rate of 38.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.84-49.66%] was achieved. The median time to progression was 6.1 months (95% CI 4.63-7.57 months) and the median overall survival time was 20.2 months (95% CI 15.50-24.90 months). The median duration of follow-up for patients was 16.9 months. The toxicity profile was more favorable than for the conventional Douillard regimen. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the modified Douillard regimen may be a practical and more tolerable treatment option in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

UFT/leucovorin and oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer

A total of 41 metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received tegafur/uracil (UFT)+leucovorin (LV)+oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/LV+irinotecan. The overall response rate was 58.5% (95% confidence interval, 42.2-73.3%), and the median progression-free survival was 8.8 months. There were no grade 4 toxicities; 12 patients (29%) experienced grade 3 diarrhoea. There were no cases of hand-foot syndrome. This alternating regimen seems to be effective and well tolerated in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CRC.     

Phase I study of gefitinib, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD), toxicities, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of gefitinib combined with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL) in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. Experimental Design Starting doses were gefitinib 250 mg/day orally without interruption, irinotecan 100 mg/m² as a 90 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, 5-FU 400 mg/m² bolus i.v. and leucovorin 20 mg/m² i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalations involved increasing gefitinib to 500 mg then increasing irinotecan to 125 mg/m² and 5-FU to 500 mg/m². Results Twenty-four patients received therapy. The starting doses proved to be the MTD, as attempts to increase the dose of either gefitinib or the chemotherapeutic agents resulted in dose-limiting toxicities. Gastrointestinal effects and bone marrow suppression were the principal toxicities; however, only 1/17 (6%) patients treated with the MTD had severe (grades 3–4) diarrhea and severe neutropenia occurred in only two (12%) patients. Partial responses occurred in 10/17 patients receiving the MTD and another five had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 12.2 and 26.6 months, respectively. In ten patients treated with the MTD, the steady-state PK of gefitinib was not affected by IFL nor did gefitinib appear to influence the PK of either irinotecan or 5-FU. Conclusions Gefitinib can be safely combined with an intermittent weekly schedule of IFL. Evidence of promising activity should encourage further clinical evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib, combined with multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase II study of oxaliplatin plus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients

The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients heavily pretreated with anthracyclines, taxanes, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and capecitabine. Sixty-two women who had received at least 3 above-mentioned drug classes were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m² as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m² on day 1, and a continuous infusion of 5-FU 1,200 mg/m² for 44 h. The median patient age was 52 years with a median of two involved organs, and the metastases were mostly in the lung (53.2%), lymph nodes (51.6%), and liver (45.2%). Patients had a median of three prior chemotherapy regimens. Forty-five patients (72.6%) had prior exposure to all 5 classes of drugs. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, 60 patients were assessable for responses and 11 patients achieved a partial response (PR), giving an overall response rate (ORR) of 18.3%. Twenty-one (35%) patients had stable disease (SD), and of these, 8 achieved long SD (13.3%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neuropathy occurring in 14 (22.6%), 9 (14.5%), and 3 (4.8%) patients, respectively. The study demonstrated that the combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV was a well-tolerated salvage regimen with moderate activity in patients with heavily pretreated MBC.     

Phase III trial of irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid versus irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Purpose

To determine whether irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) is superior to irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (FUFIRI) as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Patients and methods

A phase III, randomised, open-label multicentre study compared standard treatment with FUFIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m², folinic acid 500 mg/m² weekly times 6) to mIROX using an identical schedule of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² applied on days 1, 15 and 29 of a 7-week cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 479 eligible patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the mIROX arm and 8.2 months in the FUFIRI arm [hazard ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.37; P = 0.178]. Comparable results were also obtained for overall survival time with 19 months in the mIROX-arm and 22 months in the FUFIRI-arm (hazard ratio = 1.08, P = 0.276). Both regimens induced an identical objective response rate (ORR) of 41%, but disease control rate (ORR plus stable disease) was significantly greater in the FUFIRI group (81% versus 68%, P = 0.001). Most frequent grades 1-4 side-effects of mIROX and FUFIRI treatment were nausea (80% versus 73%) and delayed diarrhoea (79% versus 68%). Grades 3-4 toxicities were generally below 10%, except for diarrhoea which was more frequent in the mIROX-arm compared to the FUFIRI-arm (19% versus 30%, P = 0.006)

Conclusion

mIROX failed to show superior activity compared to high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid plus irinotecan. Due to better tolerability the combination of high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid and irinotecan remains a standard of care in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Oral doxifluridine plus leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer: randomized phase II trial with intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of oral doxifluridine plus leucovorin as a randomized trial with those of intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with metastatic CRC were randomized in either group A (oral doxifluridine 1,000 mg/m /d plus leucovorin 30 mg/d on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of each cycle), or group B (intravenous 5-FU 400 mg/m /d plus leucovorin 20 mg/m /d on days 1-5 of each cycle), with the cycles repeated every 4 weeks. Between July 1998 and May 2000, 77 patients were enrolled (38 in group A and 39 in group B). Response rates were 23.7% (95% CI, 11-42%) in group A, and 15.4% (95% CI, 0-25%) in group B on an intent-to-treat analysis. The median response durations of the two groups were similar with 5.6 months in group A and 5.5 months in group B. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months and 14.9 months in group A; 4.7 months and 19.5 months in group B. Toxicities in both groups were generally mild and reversible. This study shows that a combination of oral doxifluridine plus leucovorin can be active and safe as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic CRC.     

Phase II trial of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every 3 weeks to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Both irinotecan and oxaliplatin are active agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and there is a strong preclinical rationale for combining these 2 agents. Therefore, a Phase II trial was designed and conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every 3 weeks to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan at a dose of 175 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m2, both given intravenously every 3 weeks. Objective responses were evaluated every 2 courses and were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the initial determination. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled and treated in the current trial. Of the 53 patients whose responses were evaluable, 18 (34%) achieved a partial response, 27 (51%) had stable disease, and 8 (15%) developed disease progression as their best response to the treatment. The intent-to-treat median survival for all patients was 16.4 months and the time to progression was 4.8 months. All 55 patients were available for toxicity analysis (according to version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). The most common Grade 3-4 toxic effect was neutropenia, which was reported to occur in 22 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin appears to be safe and active when used to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment results with this regimen were similar to those reported for other combined frontline chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer. When this particular regimen wa used, neutropenia was found to be the predominant toxicity.     

A phase II trial of gefitinib with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer

Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling contributes to the therapy of colorectal cancer. Gefitinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows supra-additive growth inhibition with irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines in xenograft models. We designed a study to determine the tolerability and efficacy of gefitinib in combination with irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), on a 2-week schedule. Among 13 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, 10 required dose reductions of irinotecan and 5-FU because of dehydration, diarrhoea, and neutropenia, seven of whom required hospitalisation, three with neutropenic fever. One patient achieved partial response and seven had disease stabilisation. The combination of this standard chemotherapy regimen with gefitinib is associated with excessive toxicity, suggesting an interaction at a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic level.     

Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus UFT as salvage treatment in oxaliplatin,irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine plus uracil–tegafur (UFT) combination chemotherapy as a salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

Methods

This single-arm phase II study was conducted at three institutions in Korea. Patients with MCRC refractory to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan were enrolled. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m² was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. UFT 200 mg/m²/day was taken orally in three divided doses on days 1–21. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks, and tumor evaluation was carried out every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of this study was 8-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

Results

Forty-one patients were enrolled. Fourteen patients received gemcitabine/UFT as a third-line treatment and 37 patients as a fourth-line or later-line therapy. Toxicities were easily manageable, and non-hematologic toxicities of ≥grade 3 were rare. The most common toxicity of ≥grade 3 was neutropenia (20.0 %). One patient showed partial response (response rate, 2.4 %) and 14 (34.1 %) showed stable disease. The 8-week PFS rate was 42.3 %. The median PFS was 1.7 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.6–1.8 months], and the median overall survival was 9.2 months (95 % CI 5.8–12.6 months).

Conclusions

Overall efficacy of gemcitabine/UFT in refractory MCRC was unsatisfactory. However, we could find a minor proportion of patients who showed prolonged tumor stabilization to gemcitabine/UFT. Further studies are warranted to identify a patient subgroup that might have benefits from gemcitabine/UFT therapy.     

Bimonthly high-dose leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil infusion and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX3) for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to the same leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen

Background: FOLFOX2, a bimonthly regimen of high-dose leucovorin (LV), 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (LV–5-FU) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) produced a high response rate (46%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 31%–60%) in 5-FU pre-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In this phase II study, pre-treated patients were given a lower dose of oxaliplatin to reduce the toxic effects of the regimen.Patients and methods: Thirty patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma and progression while receiving bimonthly LV–5-FU (LV: 500 mg/m2, 5-FU: 1.5–2 g /m2/ 22 hours, days 1–2, every two weeks), were given the same LV–5-FU schedule with the addition of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every two weeks (FOLFOX3).Results: The main toxic effects were peripheral neuropathy (90%) with four severe sensitive neuropathies (WHO grade 2: 13%). The response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8%–39%). Median progression-free survival was 26 weeks, median survival was 57 weeks from the start of FOLFOX3 and median duration of the response was 37 weeks.Conclusions: Results obtained with FOLFOX3 confirmed the synergy between oxaliplatin and 5-FU in 5-FU-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the response rate seems to be lower than that obtained with FOLFOX2. Further studies to determine the best oxaliplatin dose intensity are in progress.