CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) versus cnf (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II lymph-node positive breast cancer: a phase III randomized multicenter study

A multicenter phase III randomized study compared the efficacies of two adjuvant polychemotherapeutic regimens in 145 patients with stage II node-positive breast cancer. The standard chemotherapy combination, CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil), was administered to 77 women. The experimental protocol, CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-FU), in which mitoxantrone (Novantrone) replaced methotrexate, was given to 68 patients. Follow-up of the 145 patients by six participating hospitals showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.6) between the two treatment regimens during a median follow-up of 4.5 years in terms of overall survival. There was, however, a significant advantage (p = 0.04) in the disease-free survival for those receiving mitoxantrone (mean survival 4.4 years for CNF versus 2.7 years for CMF). Toxic side effects associated with CNF (particularly alopecia and myelotoxicity) were relatively more frequent but acceptable and did not lead to dose reduction. In light of its association with improved disease-free survival in this study, larger studies should be undertaken on the role of mitoxantrone as adjuvant treatment in stage II breast cancer.     

Combination chemotherapy with cmf (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-Fluorouracil) versus cnf (mitoxantrone, 5-Fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide) in advanced breast-cancer - a multicenter randomized study

A multicentric randomized study was conducted to compare the CNF regimen (cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2/iv, mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2/iv, 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/m2/iv) with the CMF regimen (methotrexate at 40 mg/m2/iv instead of mitoxantrone) administered every 3 weeks to previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients. In 119 patients evaluable for therapeutic response, complete plus partial response rate was 44% for CNF and 29% for CMF (p>0.05; 95% C.I.: CNF=32%-56%, CMF=18%-40%). No statistically significant difference regarding time to progression, over survival or response to second-line chemotherapy with Epidoxorubicin was observed between the two regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated, but the percent of alopecia and leucopenia was significantly higher in the CNF patient group (31% versus 5% and 18% versus 0%, respectively; p<0.01). In conclusion, CNF was demonstrated to be slightly more toxic but more effective as compared to CMF (global response: 44% versus 29%, respectively). These findings should be taken into consideration when planning future studies of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Meta-analysis of adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer

Conflicting results have been published regarding the efficacy of adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF)-type chemotherapy in postmenopausal, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive women. The Oxford overview suggests real but limited benefit of any chemotherapy in this group of patients but avoids analyzing smaller subsets. We wished to better quantitate the benefit of adding CMF to tamoxifen in postmenopausal ER-positive women with tumor involvement of axillary lymph nodes. Six randomized studies comparing CMF plus tamoxifen to tomoxifen alone in postmenopausal, ER-positive, node-positive women have been published since 1992. They include 2368 patients. We performed a meta-analysis of 6 endpoints: survival, disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, contralateral breast recurrence, and thromboembolic complications. There was a statistically significant increase in disease-free survival from the addition of CMF-type chemotherapy to tamoxifen in this population; the absolute risk of relapse was reduced by 5.5% at 5 years. Effects of locoregional recurrence were greater than those on overall recurrence. No significant survival benefit was observed.     

Adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial was to determine whether a combination chemotherapy regimen that contains anthracycline (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide [AC]) is superior to the conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil [CMF] combination in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive Stage II breast carcinoma. METHODS: Premenopausal women with lymph node positive breast carcinoma were stratified according to age (younger than 35 or 35 years or older) and the number of positive axillary lymph nodes (1-3, 4-9, or >/= 10) and then randomly assigned to receive either doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks or cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally on Days 1 through 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. Both arms were scheduled for six cycles. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 57 months. Eighteen of the 55 AC patients developed recurrence compared with 16 of the 69 CMF patients. The corresponding 5-year recurrence free survival rates were 64% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.12). The site of the first recurrence for AC patients was locoregional in 7%, distant in 22%, and combined in 4%. The corresponding data for the CMF arm were 4%, 16%, and 3%, respectively. Six AC patients died compared with 9 CMF patients. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 90% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.96). More leukopenia (52%, mostly Grade 1-2) occurred in the CMF arm than in the AC arm (33%, P = 0.001), but no febrile episode was accompanied with leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no difference between AC and CMF with respect to both disease free and overall survival rates in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine the response rate; secondary objectives were to assess the toxicity rate, and disease-free and overall survival rates in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) receiving a cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2) (CMF) chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from 74 patients with LABC with neoadjuvant CMF chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperatively, all patients received 3 cycles of CMF on day 1, repeated every 21 days. In 3 (4.1%) patients, breast-conserving surgery was given and in 71 (95.9%) modified radical mastectomy. All patients received radiotherapy and 3 additional cycles of CMF chemotherapy after surgery. RESULTS: Median age of the patients was 47 years (range: 17-74). 43 patients were premenopausal, whereas 31 were postmenopausal. 54 patients were in stage IIIA, and 20 were in stage IIIB. The overall clinical response rate was 88%; 11 (14.9%) had a complete response, 54 (73%) had a partial response, and 2 (2.8%) had progression. 14 (18.9%) had a pathological complete response. The median follow-up was 62 months. The median disease-free survival was 64.9 months, and the median overall survival was 97.5 months. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 52% and 79.9%, respectively. Most frequent side-effects were nausea/vomiting, mucositis, alopecia and leukopenia. CONCLUSION: The CMF regimen has a high overall response rate and an acceptable side effect profile in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate its effectiveness in breast-conserving strategies.     

Adjuvant chemohormonal therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone (CMFP) or CMFP plus tamoxifen compared with CMF for premenopausal breast cancer patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial

The current trial was designed to assess whether the addition of prednisone or prednisone + tamoxifen would enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of 1 year of adjuvant CMF therapy. Premenopausal women with ipsilateral axillary node-positive breast carcinoma and known estrogen receptor (ER) status were randomized to receive 1 year of postoperative treatment with 12 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF), CMF plus prednisone (CMFP), or CMFP plus tamoxifen (CMFPT). There were 553 analyzed cases with 188 receiving CMF, 183 CMFP, and 182 CMFPT. The overall time to relapse (TTR) and survival comparisons between the regimens are not statistically different at a median follow-up time of 7.7 years. The major subgroups currently with a suggestive TTR difference are greater than 3N+ (CMFPT greater than CMF, P = 0.07) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) greater than 3N+ (CMFPT greater than CMF, P = 0.03). Patients receiving CMFPT appeared to have a superior survival to CMF in the ER- greater than 3N+ cohort (P = 0.02). The following patient characteristics were associated with a significantly longer TTR: decreasing nodal involvement or tumor size, positive ER status, age greater than or equal to 40 years, and decreasing obesity. The favorable effects of decreasing nodal involvement, positive ER status, age 40 years or greater, and decreasing obesity carried over to survival. Development of amenorrhea was also significantly associated with improved survival (P = 0.001). Toxicity was increased by the addition of prednisone to CMF and by the addition of tamoxifen to CMFP. Overall relapse patterns were similar among the three regimens. The results of the current trial do not currently suggest an overall therapeutic benefit for adding prednisone or only 1 year of tamoxifen to CMF adjuvant treatment.     

Primary chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in operable breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Primary chemotherapy (PC) is becoming an accepted practice to treat large tumors to avoid mastectomies and as a surrogate of outcome. METHODS: A series of 305 patients with tumors >3 cm with T2-3N0-1M0 classification were treated with a multimodal approach that consisted of 3 courses of primary cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) followed by appropriate local treatment and 3 more courses of CMF or 4 courses of doxorubicin. Response was assessed by mammography. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (a 3% pathologic complete response rate). Conservative surgery was achieved in 79.64% of the patients with a low rate of local disease recurrences (5%). Toxicity was minimal. With a median follow-up of 104 months, the 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 57.63% and the 8-year overall survival (OS) was 67.65%. The DFS and OS rates for patients with a clinical response were significantly longer, i.e., 70% (P=0.0048) and 90% (P=0.0042), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PC with CMF was feasible. A high rate of breast-conservative surgery was achieved. The current results stressed the value of PC to increase conservative surgery and as a predictor of outcome.     

Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of doxorubicin versus methotrexate in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC versus CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 985 women undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (T1-3 N0-2 M0, stage I-IIIA, UICC) from nine hospitals were stratified with respect to axillary node involvement (node positive versus node negative) and randomized to receive either FAC (500/50/500/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles or CMF (600/60/600/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: The relative dose intensities of FAC and CMF were 87% and 85% of planned doses, respectively. Unadjusted data indicated a non-significant trend towards better results with FAC. In the prospectively formed subset of node-negative patients, disease-free survival and overall survival were statistically superior in the FAC treatment arm (P = 0.041 and 0.034, respectively), but this advantage was not seen in the subset of node-positive patients, probably because of a difference in the percentage of patients with four or more positive nodes. Adjusting data for size of treatment effect and potential interactions (number of positive nodes, tumor size, treatment center), the overall relative risk (RR) of disease recurrence and death were significantly lower with FAC treatment (RR 1.2, P = 0.03, and RR 1.3, P = 0.05, respectively). This result was mainly due to the difference observed in the node-negative patient population. Toxicity was mild: FAC induced more alopecia, emesis, mucositis and cardiotoxicity; this last was of clinical concern, but was infrequent and manageable. CMF induced more conjunctivitis and weight gain. There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil is superior to methotrexate in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. A treatment effect is particularly evident in the node-negative patients. Although the clinical toxicity of FAC is greater than that of CMF, the levels were manageable and clinically acceptable.     

Population pharmacokinetics of adjuvant cyclophosphamide,methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)

Despite the success of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate (MTX), 5-fluouracil (5-FU) (CMF) treatment for early stage breast cancer, more than 35% of patients die within 5 years of diagnosis. Optimisation of the dose of each component drug may improve survival and reduce toxicity. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)), MTX (40 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)) were determined in 46 women, with data on two consecutive courses available for 41 patients. A population analysis using NONMEM was performed to investigate the effect of patient covariates on pharmacokinetics (PK), and to estimate the relative magnitude of interindividual and interoccasion variability. Patient weight had a significant influence on the clearance of cyclophosphamide and on the volume of central compartment for MTX, whose clearance was dependent on renal function. For all three drugs, interoccasion variability was of the same order (20-40%) as that between individuals, suggesting a limited potential for dose-optimisation of this regimen.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide or CMF in premenopausal women with stage II breast cancer

Summary After total mastectomy and partial axillary dissection, 805 premenopausal women with stage II breast cancer were randomized to receive postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone, RT + cyclophosphamide (C) for 12 monthly cycles, or RT + cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) for 12 monthly cycles. At 3 years actuarial relapse-free survival for RT + C and RT + CMF was significantly better than for RT alone (p = 0.0009 and 0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference in relapse-free survival between RT + C and RT + CMF.C resulted in more pronounced haematologic toxicity and a higher frequency of amenorrhoea and of alopecia than CMF, while CMF resulted in more pronounced nausea and stomatitis than C.In the preliminary results, C alone may be as effective as CMF in prolonging relapse-free survival in premenopausal women with stage II breast cancer.     

Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (NFL) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: randomized comparison to cyclophosphamide,methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and attempts to improve efficacy by adding paclitaxel

The combination of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m² i.v., day 1) 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m² i.v. days 1–3) and leucovorin (300 mg i.v. days 1–3) is an active and well-tolerated regimen for metastatic breast cancer. We compared this regimen to a standard CMF regimen (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² i.v. day 1; methotrexate 40 mg/m² day 1; 5FU 600 mg/m² i.v. day I) in a randomized, phase II study. One hundred and twenty-eight women receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were treated. NFL produced lugher response rates (45% vs. 26%) and longer remissions (9 months vs. 6 months) than did CMF; overall survival was not different (19 months vs. 16 months). Both regimens were well tolerated. In an attempt to improve efficacy, we added paclitaxel(l35 mg/m² i.v. 1-h infusion) to the NFL regimen. Although this regimen was active (51 % response rate in first-second-line treatment], myelosuppression was greater than expected. These results confirm the utility of NFL as an active, well-tolerated regimen for the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer.     

Low dose chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CAMF) versus sequential cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and adriamycin.

Seventy-eight advanced breast cancer patients with hormone-resistant disease or visceral metastases were randomized to receive either of two low dose regimens consisting of cyclophosphamide (C), methotrexate (M), 5-fluorouracil (F), and Adriamycin (A) as their initial chemotherapy. One group was treated with CAMF, and the other with CMF until progression, followed by A (CMF leads to A). C was given at 50 mg/m2, po, days 1-14; M at 20 mg/m2, F at 300 mg/m2, and A at 20 mg/m2, iv, days 1 and 8 of each 28-day cycle. The response rates for CAMF vs. CMF did not differ significantly (complete and partial responses-62% vs. 49%; stabilizations-23% vs. 31%). Responses by site of metasis, median times to progression and median survivals were similar for both groups. Poor and good risk partial responders had similar survivals. Twelve percent of CMF patients treated with Adriamycin at the time of progression had partial responses with an associated improved survival. Since CMF is as effective as CAMF, but has less toxicity, low dose therapy with CMF is more acceptable than CAMF as an initial chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer. Adriamycin may be reserved for subsequent regression induction.     

The feasibility of classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for pre- and post-menopausal node-positive breast cancer patients in a Belgian multicentric trial: a study of consistency in relative dose intensity (RDI) and cumulative doses across institutions.

BACKGROUND: Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) including oral cyclophosphamide is still considered an important adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in patients with early breast cancer (BC). Concern has been raised regarding the feasibility of this regimen, especially in postmenopausal patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 254 pre- and post-menopausal node-positive BC patients aged < or = 70 years received six cycles of CMF in the context of a Belgian multicentric phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy. CMF dose and schedule were as follows: cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 p.o. on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/ml i.v. on days 1 and 8; cycles q. 28 days. The relative dose intensity (RDI) was calculated as the ratio between the delivered DI and the planned DI. We also analysed the RDI in two subgroups of patients with age > or = 50 years or < 50 years. RESULTS: Overall, the percentage of patients ending the six cycles of the planned CMF regimen was 90%. The mean RDI achieved in the population of 254 patients was 90% (range 8% to 129%). The subgroup analysis of patients aged > or = 50 years and < 50 years showed that 81% and 76% of patients, respectively, received > or = 80% of the planned chemotherapy dose intensity (P = 0.33). No statistically significant difference was found between the percentage of patients who received a RDI < 80% and the participating institutions (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The classical CMF regimen was a feasible regimen in the context of a multicentric trial, in which academic institutions as well as community hospitals participated. No substantial differences in RDI and cumulative doses were found in relation to a patient's age and the participating institution.     

Methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment in patients receiving adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy: a randomized crossover blind study

Nineteen women receiving their first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were randomized between two antiemetic drugs: methylprednisolone (MPN) 125mg and metoclopramide (MCP) 20mg, both given by intravenous push as a single dose. The chemotherapy included: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). The total response rates for MPN and MCP were: complete protection 11% versus 0% and partial protection 63% versus 11% of the patients, respectively (P = 0.007). Eighteen patients (95%) preferred MPN over MCP. Common side effects with both drugs were: drowsiness, headache and diarrhea. MPN is recommended as an antiemetic in patients receiving CMF adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Long-term outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and fluorouracil in women with breast cancer

The aim of the study is to report the long-term outcome and secondary tumours of early breast cancer patients of adjuvant CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy. One hundred and ninety four patients, 185 primary early breast cancer and nine locoregionally recurrent breast cancer patients, were entered onto the trial between May 1986 and November 1993. The therapies included surgery, radiation therapy, adjuvant CNF chemotherapy, and tamoxifen according to hormonal status. Some of patients were treated twice with CMF (methotrexate). The median follow-up time was 12.9 years. Eighty nine (48%) primary breast cancers relapsed, and six locoregional breast cancers relapsed. After 5-10 years the relapse incidence decreased notably. Eighty three patients died of breast cancer, and nine of other causes. Two cases of leukemia, six cases of skin cancer, two cases of Hodgkin's disease, two cases of meningioma, and two cases of endometrial cancer were observed. This article confirms the feasibility of adjuvant CNF for early breast cancer patients. Questions of possible causability of secondary cancer have yet to be explored.     

Primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma comparing CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) with an anthracycline-containing regimen: short-term responses translated into long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The role of anthracyclines has been extensively studied in adjuvant chemotherapy, but much less in the primary chemotherapy of early breast carcinoma. This study, comparing CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) with the rotational anthracycline-containing regimen CMFEV (CMF plus epirubicin and vincristine) administered as primary chemotherapy, demonstrated a significant increase in clinical complete response in premenopausal women. We report the long-term results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eleven patients with stage I or II palpable breast carcinoma and a tumour diameter of >2.5 cm were randomised to receive CMF or CMFEV for four cycles before surgery. After surgery, the patients in both arms received adjuvant CMF for three cycles. RESULTS: In the study population as a whole, there was a non-significant 20% reduction in mortality and relapse rates in the CMFEV arm. However, the effect of the experimental regimen was only found in premenopausal patients, especially in terms of relapse-free survival (P=0.07) and locoregional relapse-free survival (P=0.0009), thus mirroring the effect on response rates. After 10 years, the proportions of premenopausal patients free from locoregional relapse as a first event in the CMF and CMFEV groups were 68% and 97%, respectively. No relevant differences were found in postmenopausal patients. CONCLUSION: The overall results of this study showed that the greater activity of the experimental anthracycline-containing combination over CMF as primary chemotherapy in premenopausal patients translated into long-term effects in the same subgroup.     

Correlation of estrogen receptors and response to chemotherapy of cyclophosphamide,methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in advanced breast cancer

Thirty-six patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with the regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Their response to the combination chemotherapy and their survival were correlated in respect to estrogen-receptor (ER) status. No patient had received any form of hormonal therapy or other chemotherapeutic agents prior to the CMF treatment. Overall response rate, both complete and partial, to chemotherapy was 60% (21/36): 88% in the ER+ group (14/16) and 35% in the ER– group (7/20). Median duration of response was 17 months in ER+ and seven months in the ER–. Median duration of survival was 27 months in ER+ patients and nine months in ER– patients after initiation of chemotherapy. These data suggest ER+ status has a beneficial effect in the responsiveness of advanced breast cancer to CMF chemotherapy and is prognostic of better survival.     

Comparison of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) with a rotational crossing and a sequential intensification regimen in advanced breast cancer: a prospective randomized study

The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research tested two experimental chemotherapy strategies in an attempt to improve the results achievable with conventional chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. One hundred sixty-two patients were randomly allocated as follows: (a) to the conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy regimen (CMF); (b) to a rotational crossing program (ROT-CROSS); or (c) to a sequential intensification program (SEQ-INT). The same single agents (C, M, F, cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin) were administered in both experimental arms, but following a different policy. The SEQ-INT program induced a significantly higher complete response (32% vs. 6%, p = 0.0006) and objective response rate (72% vs. 42%, p = 0.0047) than CMF did. There were no differences in survival between CMF and either experimental arm. A number of side effects were significantly more with both experimental chemotherapies than with CMF, but the treatments were generally tolerable. Although some caution is required when interpreting a significant advantage found between an entire chemotherapeutic strategy and a single conventional combination, this study documents the potential therapeutic advantage of administering different sequential chemotherapies, and changing each at the time of maximum result without waiting for a progression. The impressive cytoreductive effects achievable with this policy (SEQ-INT) in metastatic disease merit further investigation in the adjuvant setting.     

Identifying good prognosis group of breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes for adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prognosis factors for survival in breast cancer patients with 1-3 axillary lymph node metastases and tried to identify a subset of patients with good prognosis suitable for cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A cohort of 446 breast cancer patients received definite surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 1990 to 1998. They were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time was 69 months. Prognostic factors including age, tumor size, number of involved nodes, steroid receptor status, tumor ploidy, synthetic-phase fraction, histologic grade and administration of tamoxifen were analysed for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by Cox regression model. RESULTS: The estimated 5 year OS and DFS for all patients were 85.4 and 71.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size, age and estrogen receptor (ER) status were independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor size, age, ER status and number of involved nodes were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The 5 year OS rates of the low-risk group (age >40, tumor < or =3 cm and positive ER) and average-risk group (either age < or =40, tumor >3 cm or negative ER) were 98.8 and 82.4%, respectively (P = 0.0001). The 5 year DFS of the low-risk and high-risk group were 88.2 and 67.7%, respectively (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Among breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes excellent survival rate was found in those who had favorable prognostic factors, including age >40, tumor size < or =3 cm and positive ER. Adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF regimen is optimal for these low-risk patients.     

Doxorubicin versus methotrexate both combined with cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer--a randomised study with more than 10 years follow-up from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)

To evaluate the substitution of methotrexate with doxorubicin (Dox) in CMF-(cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) containing regimen for advanced breast cancer, 415 postmenopausal patients below the age of 66 years, na?ve to chemotherapy, were accrued from 1980 to 1984 and followed-up until 1995. They received tamoxifen 30 mg daily orally and by randomisation either 400 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide, 25 mg/m2 doxorubicin and 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil (CAF) or 40 mg/m2 methotrexate instead of Dox (CMF) intravenously (i.v.) days 1 + 8 repeated every 4 weeks. Dox was substituted by methotrexate at a cumulative dose of 550 mg/m2. Among 341 eligible patients the response rate and median time to progression was significantly in favour of CAF: 53% CAF versus 36% CMF (P = 0.002) and 11.8 months CAF versus 6.5 months CMF (P = 0.001). Median duration of response was 19.5 CAF versus 18.0 CMF months, and survival 20.8 CAF versus 17.4 CMF months (non-significant). The two regimens were equimyelotoxic. There were no treatment-related fatalities but 1 patient with congestive heart failure on CAF was reported. Nausea/vomiting, stomatitis and infections were modest in both groups, whilst alopecia was more common with CAF. Regression analysis showed that long recurrence free interval, good performance status, and no visceral involvement was significantly related to long-term survival, whilst the treatment regimen was not. It is concluded that in chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced breast cancer Dox-containing regimens are superior and remain the first choice of chemotherapy, especially in patients with visceral metastases, until newer drugs and combinations have been proven to be superior.