Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: lack of interaction with taurine

Recent microdialysis studies showed that ethanol administration increases the release of taurine in various rat brain regions, and it was suggested that this increase in extracellular concentrations of taurine might mediate some of the neurochemical effects of ethanol. Previous drug discrimination studies showed that positive modulators of the GABA(A) receptor consistently substituted for ethanol discriminative stimulus effects. Since taurine is also believed to modulate GABA(A) receptor activity, this study addressed the hypothesis that taurine mediates the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol due to GABA(A) activation. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate water from either 1 or 2 g/kg ethanol. In a first experiment, various taurine doses (0-500 mg/kg) were tested to investigate whether taurine substitutes for ethanol. In a second experiment, rats were pretreated with either 500 mg/kg taurine or an equivalent volume of saline before testing for ethanol discrimination with various ethanol doses (0-2.0 g/kg). The results showed that taurine does not substitute for ethanol at any tested doses. In addition, taurine pretreatments failed to modify the dose-response curve for ethanol discrimination. These results demonstrate that taurine is not directly involved in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. It is therefore very unlikely that the brain release of taurine observed after ethanol administration is implicated in the major pharmacological effects of ethanol, i.e. positive modulation of GABA(A) receptor, that mediate its discriminative stimulus effects.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in rats using a three-choice ethanol-midazolam-water discrimination

Three-choice discrimination procedures are used to characterize how similar the discriminative stimulus effects of two drugs are in relation to each other. This procedure has suggested similarities between ethanol and ligands that positively modulate the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor complex. As an extension to these studies, male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate midazolam (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from ethanol (1.0 g/kg, i.g.) from water (2.3 ml, i.g.) in a three-lever, food reinforced task. Substitution tests were conducted following administration of GABAA-positive modulators, noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, 5-HT1B agonists and isopropanol. Among the GABAA-positive modulators, diazepam was the only drug that completely substituted for midazolam; both pentobarbital and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone showed partial midazolam substitution. The NMDA antagonist dizocilpine substituted for ethanol, while phencyclidine showed no substitution for either ethanol or midazolam. The serotonin agonists tested also showed no substitution for either ethanol or midazolam. Isopropanol was the only other drug that completely substituted for ethanol. These data extend previous findings from an ethanol-pentobarbital-water discrimination and further define training conditions that result in a conditional basis for the ethanol discrimination where only those drugs with pharmacological heterogeneous effects similar to ethanol produce a full ethanol-like effect.     

mGlu5 receptors are involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol in rats

Recent work has identified a role for metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu(5)) in the discriminative stimulus properties of investigator-administered ethanol. The purpose of this study was to determine if mGlu(5) receptors modulate the discriminative stimulus properties of self-administered ethanol. Results show that the mGlu(5) receptor antagonist 6-Methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP; 10 mg/kg) inhibited the discriminative stimulus properties of consumed ethanol during a self-administration test session. Further, 10 mg/kg MPEP increased and 1 mg/kg MPEP decreased the amount of self-administered ethanol required to produce full substitution. These results indicate that mGlu(5) receptors are involved in the expression of the discriminative stimulus properties of self-administered ethanol.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of low doses of ethanol in humans

Discriminative stimulus properties of low doses of ethanol were evaluated in humans using established behavioural drug discrimination procedures. Twenty-five moderate drinkers (12 females and 13 males) were trained to discriminate placebo from 0.2 g/kg ethanol in 200 ml tonic water mixed with Tabasco sauce and drunk in portions of 50 ml every 15 s. Seventeen of the subjects (ten females and seven males) were able to reach criterion performance (at least 80% correct responses). Generalisation responding across ethanol doses of 0 (placebo), 0.025, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 g/kg was examined the day after training using a procedure in which subjects reported the extent to which the test stimulus resembled the training dose. At the end of each generalisation session, self ratings of mood changes, physiological responses and performance in a working memory and a time estimation task were evaluated. Subjects were able to distinguish the three higher doses of ethanol from placebo. Self ratings indicated that subjects' ability to distinguish ethanol from placebo was related, at the highest dose, to change of taste, but to feelings of light-headedness at the lower doses. Ethanol administration influenced skin conductance measurements but there was no relationship found between changes in skin conductance and the ethanol discriminative stimulus. These data suggest a difference in the nature of the discriminative stimulus of ethanol between high (training) and low (generalising) doses as indicated in the subjective reports. Received: 28 July 1997/Final version: 15 October 1997     

Discriminative stimulus effects of N,N-diisopropyltryptamine

Rationale

Serotonergic hallucinogens such as (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and dimethyltryptamine (DMT) produce distinctive visual effects, whereas the synthetic hallucinogen N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (DiPT) is known for its production of auditory distortions.

Objective

This study compares the discriminative stimulus effects of DiPT to those of visual hallucinogens.

Methods

Adult male rats were trained to discriminate DiPT (5 mg/kg, 15 min) from saline under a FR10 schedule. A dose–effect and time course of DiPT's discriminative stimulus effects were established. DMT, (?)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), LSD, (±)-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and (+)-methamphetamine were tested for cross-substitution in DiPT-trained animals.

Results

Rats learned to discriminate DiPT from saline in an average of 60 training sessions (30 drug and 30 saline). DiPT (0.5–5 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent increases in drug-appropriate responding (DAR) to 99 % (ED₅₀?=?2.47 mg/kg). Onset of the discriminative stimulus effects was within 5 min, and the effects dissipated within 4 h. Full substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of DiPT occurred with LSD, DOM, and MDMA. DMT only partially substituted for DiPT (65 % DAR), whereas (+)-methamphetamine failed to substitute for DiPT (29 % DAR).

Conclusions

The discriminative stimulus effects of DiPT were similar those of a number of synthetic hallucinogens, only partially similar to those of DMT, but not similar to (+)-methamphetamine. The putative DiPT-induced auditory distortions do not lead to discriminative stimulus effects distinguishable from other hallucinogens.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons

Pigeons were trained to discriminate the IM injection of pentobarbital (5 or 10 mg/kg) from saline in a task in which 20 consecutive pecks on one of two response keys produced access to mixed grain. Pentobarbital (1.0–17.8 mg/kg) produced a dose-related increase in the percentage of the total session responses that occurred on the pentobarbital-appropriate key. The concomitant administration of bemegride (5.6–17.8 mg/kg) antagonized the discriminative control of behavior exerted by the training dose of pentobarbital. Benzodiazepines, diazepam (1.0 mg/kg) and clobazam (3.2 mg/kg), and barbiturates, methohexital (10 mg/kg), phenobarbital (56 mg/kg), and barbital (56 mg/kg), produced responding on the pentobarbital-appropriate key similar to that produced by pentobarbital. In contrast, narcotics such as morphine, ethylketazocine, cyclazocine, and SKF-10,047, at doses up to and including those that markedly suppressed response rates, produced responding predominantly on the saline-appropriate key. Similarly, the anticonvulsants, valproate, phenytoin, and ethosuximide occasioned only saline-appropriate behavior, indicating that not all anticonvulsants share discriminative stimulus effects with pentobarbital. Muscimol, a direct GABA agonist, and baclofen, a structural analogue of GABA, also failed to produce pentobarbital-appropriate responding. Ketamine, dextrorphan, and ethanol (0.3–3.2 g/kg, orally) produced intermediate levels of pentobarbital-appropriate responding, suggesting that the discriminative effects of these drugs may be somewhat like those of pentobarbital.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of alcohol in humans

The discriminative stimulus effects of alcohol were examined in 11 healthy moderate alcohol users. Study days occurred 5 days per week for 12–25 total days. Each day, participants completed visual-analog reports of drug effect and drug-discrimination tasks at 30-min intervals for 2.5 h following oral alcohol administration. Participants completed three phases. During the training phase, which occurred on the first 4 study days, participants were trained to discriminate color-coded placebo and alcohol doses (0 vs. 0.45 g per liter of body water (g/lbw)). Participants then completed a control phase, during which accurate drug-discrimination performance was verified. Finally, participants completed a testing phase, during which both training and intermediate doses (0.15 and 0.30 g/lbw) were administered. During the testing phase, 25 and 100% of responses occurred on the alcohol key at the 0- and 0.45-g/lbw doses, respectively, indicating that discrimination responding remained intact. At the low dose (0.15 g/lbw), 25% of the subjects responded on the alcohol key, whereas 75% of the subjects responded on the alcohol key at the moderate dose (0.30 g/lbw), indicating dose-related generalization to the training doses. These results confirm cross-species generality in the discriminative stimulus effects of alcohol, and further establishes the utility of human laboratory drug-discrimination procedures for analysis of the functional effects of alcohol.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol: effects of cumulative dosing and Ro 15-4513

A cumulative dose-testing procedure was developed to assess the stimulus control of ethanol (EtOH). This procedure was then used to examine the interaction between EtOH and the imidazobenzo-diazepine Ro 15-4513 in rats trained to discriminate between EtOH (lg/kg) and saline. Rebreathed air was used to assess concentrations of EtOH. When injected as a single dose (lg/kg), the concentration of EtOH in the breath did not differ significantly from the final concentration of the same amount administered cumulatively (0.25 + 0.25+0.5g/kg = lg/kg). Likewise, the generalization gradient of cumulatively administered EtOH did not differ from the gradient obtained when the three doses of EtOH were tested on separate days. The ED(50) values were 0.41g/kg for the cumulative, and 0.5g/kg for the separate administrations. Drug stimulus control was examined after 0.25, 0.5 and 1g/kg of EtOH. In combination with Ro 15-4513 (0.1-30mg/kg), administered 5min prior to the first dose of EtOH, a slight attenuation of the discriminative response to EtOH by Ro 15-4513 was seen with half (0.5g/kg) the training dose of EtOH. However, the slope function of the regression was fairly flat. Ro 15-4513 did not significantly change stimulus control induced by 0.25 and 1g/kg of EtOH. Response-times were significantly longer as a function of Ro 15-4513 dose, particularly during the first test.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol with a conditioned taste aversion procedure: lack of acetaldehyde substitution

Acetaldehyde has been suggested to mediate a number of the pharmacological and behavioural effects of ethanol. Recently, several studies investigated the role of acetaldehyde in the subjective effects of ethanol, but obtained conflicting results. With the discriminative taste aversion (DTA) procedure, high acetaldehyde doses were shown to substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. In contrast, the operant drug discrimination protocol failed to show any substitution effect of acetaldehyde. Several methodological differences between the two procedures could explain these discrepancies, and particularly the absence of an individual discrimination criterion in the DTA procedure. In the present study, the DTA procedure was adapted to introduce such a criterion. In addition, the effects of acetaldehyde were compared with those of other drugs, for which the substitution effects for ethanol are well known. Rats were trained to discriminate 1.0 g/kg ethanol from saline in a DTA protocol. When the rats met the criterion of ethanol discrimination, various doses of several drugs were tested for their ethanol stimulus substitution effects: ethanol, acetaldehyde, dizocilpine, diazepam and nicotine. The results showed a clear dose-dependent discrimination of ethanol stimulus effects. In addition, dizocilpine fully substituted for ethanol, while diazepam only partially substituted. In contrast, both acetaldehyde and nicotine failed to substitute for ethanol. These results show that acetaldehyde is not significantly involved in the subjective and discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. Acetaldehyde up to toxic doses did not substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus in the DTA protocol, when non-specific effects were carefully controlled.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone in rhesus monkeys

Rationale

Neuroactive steroids and benzodiazepines can positively modulate GABA by acting at distinct binding sites on synaptic GABA_A receptors. Although these receptors are thought to mediate the behavioral effects of both benzodiazepines and neuroactive steroids, other receptors (e.g., extrasynaptic GABA_A, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), σ₁, or 5-HT₃ receptors) might contribute to the effects of neuroactive steroids, accounting for differences among positive modulators.

Objective

The current study established the neuroactive steroid pregnanolone as a discriminative stimulus to determine whether actions in addition to positive modulation of synaptic GABA_A receptors might contribute to its discriminative stimulus effects.

Methods

Four rhesus monkeys discriminated 5.6 mg/kg pregnanolone while responding under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of stimulus-shock termination.

Results

Positive modulators acting at benzodiazepine, barbiturate, or neuroactive steroid sites produced ≥80 % pregnanolone-lever responding, whereas drugs acting primarily at receptors other than synaptic GABA_A receptors, such as extrasynaptic GABA_A, NMDA, σ₁, and 5-HT₃ receptors, produced vehicle-lever responding. Flumazenil antagonized the benzodiazepines midazolam and flunitrazepam, with Schild analyses yielding slopes that did not deviate from unity and pA₂ values of 7.39 and 7.32, respectively. Flumazenil did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone.

Conclusion

While these results do not exclude the possibility that pregnanolone acts at receptors other than synaptic GABA_A receptors, they indicate a primary and possibly exclusive role of synaptic GABA_A receptors in its discriminative stimulus effects. Reported differences in the effects of benzodiazepines and neuroactive steroids are not due to differences in their actions at synaptic GABA_A receptors.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of buprenorphine in the rat

 Buprenorphine, a potent ”low efficacy” or ”partial” morphine-like opioid agonist, has morphine-like discriminative effects in animals and humans discriminating morphine or a related drug. The purpose of the present study was to characterize further the discriminative effects of buprenorphine in subjects trained to discriminate buprenorphine itself. Rats trained to discriminate between SC injections of saline and either 0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine generalized completely to morphine and to other morphine-like agonists. These drugs were approximately 3 times more potent in the rats trained with 0.03 mg/kg buprenorphine than in those trained with 0.1 mg/kg; however, the potency of buprenorphine itself did not differ significantly between groups. Indicative of efficacy differences among mixed-action opioids, rats discriminating 0.03 mg/kg buprenorphine generalized completely to butorphanol and pentazocine and partially to nalbuphine, whereas those discriminating 0.1 mg/kg generalized completely to butorphanol, partially to pentazocine, and little to nalbuphine. Stimulus control of behavior by 0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine was blocked surmountably by low doses of antagonists, stereoselective, and pharmacologically selective. These results are consistent with those of other studies showing that the discriminative effects of buprenorphine are morphine-like and mediated by the mu-opioid receptor, and extend the conditions under which this has been demonstrated to stimulus control maintained by buprenorphine itself. Received: 18 September 1996 / Final version: 6 November 1996     

Discriminative stimulus effects of the novel anxiolytic buspirone

Separate groups of Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate either 0.56 or 1.0mg/kg buspirone i.p. in a two-lever, drug vs no-drug discrimination procedure. Training took twice as long for the lower versus the higher training-dose group. Generalization tests were conducted with buspirone (0.1-1.8mg/kg, i.p., 0.32-10mg/kg, p.o.), pentylenetetrazole (1-18mg/kg, i.p.), meprobamate (3.2-180mg/kg, p.o.), haloperidol (0.01-0.32mg/kg, i.p.), and 8-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.32mg/kg, i.p.). Buspirone p.o. was 0.5-1.0 log(10) units less potent than buspirone i.p. in producing dose-dependent generalization (i.e. > 80% buspirone-lever responding). Dose-effect functions for the 1.0 training-dose group were to the right of those for the 0.56 group. Partial generalization to meprobamate occurred in both groups, representing the first report of overlap of the buspirone discriminative stimulus with that of another anxiolytic. Complete generalization to 8-OH-DPAT occurred, consistent with buspirone's prominent 5HT(1A)-receptor activity and replicating findings in the pigeon. Partial generalization to haloperidol was concluded: every rat generalized to haloperidol, but the gradients did not increase monotonically and drug-lever responding at a given dose was inconsistent within and across rats. The haloperidol results suggest a stronger influence of the dopaminergic component in the buspirone discriminative stimulus in rats than was found with pigeons. Although a previous study found generalization to buspirone from pentylenetetrazole in baboons, there was no generalization to pentylenetetrazole from buspirone in the present study.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of dextromethorphan in the rat

This study was performed to characterize pharmacologically the discriminative stimulus effects of dextromethorphan, an antitussive that binds with high affinity to a subtype ofsigma site in the brain. Dextrorphan, a metabolite of dextromethorphan, has phencyclidine (PCP)-like effects. Therefore, training was conducted with dextromethorphan injected by the SC route, which minimizes dextrorphan formation compared to the IP route. The training dose used, 30 mg/kg, by the SC route did not occasion selection of the PCP-appropriate choice lever in rats discriminating IP injections of 2.0 mg/kg PCP from saline. (In contrast, by the IP route the ED₅₀ of dextromethorphan for PCP-appropriate lever selection was 21.7 mg/kg). In rats discriminating 30 mg/kg (SC) of dextromethorphan from distilled water, dextromethorphan was slightly more potent SC than it was IP (ED₅₀s for dextromethorphan-appropriate lever selection: 8.5 and 14.9 mg/kg, respectively). These animals generalized dose-dependently and completely to PCP and to other PCP-receptor ligands, but selected the vehicle-appropriate choice lever when tested withsigma-site ligands,mu-opioid agonists, and naltrexone. Concurrent administration of naltrexone orsigma-site ligands with 30 mg/kg dextromethorphan did not block dextromethorphan-appropriate responding. These results show that the discriminative effects of SC dextromethorphan are PCP-like and are not mediated by the high-affinity dextromethorphan binding site or by themu-opioid receptor. Because little dextrorphan is formed when dextromethorphan is given SC and because dextromethorphan itself has low affinity for the PCP receptor, the discriminative effects of SC dextromethorphan probably are mediated by a recognition site related closely to but different from the PCP receptor.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of melatonin in the rat

To provide initial information on the potential mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus effects of melatonin, rats were trained to discriminate melatonin (150 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-choice discrete-trial avoidance paradigm. Stimulus generalization curves for melatonin were steep; complete generalization with melatonin occurred at 100–150 mg/kg. Triazolam generalized completely with melatonin (n=7). Flurazepam generalized completely with melatonin in only two out of six rats; however, partial generalization was produced in the remaining four animals. The melatonin-appropriate responding produced by triazolam was antagonized completely (in six out of seven rats) by 0.3–10 mg/kg flumazenil (Ro 15–1788). In contrast, the dose of flumazenil sufficient to block completely the melatonin-like discriminative effects of triazolam failed to block the stimulus effects of the training dose of melatonin. Pentobarbital produced primarily melatonin-appropriate responding, with complete generalization with melatonin in five out of seven rats. Diphenhydramine generalized completely with melatonin in two out of seven rats; however, little or no partial generalization was observed in the remaining five rats. These results suggest that melatonin may produce its discriminative effects through sites on the GABA_A-benzodiazepine receptor complex distinct from the benzodiazepine binding sites.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of etorphine in rhesus monkeys

Two rhesus monkeys were trained to discriminate the IM injection of etorphine (0.001 mg/kg) from saline in a task in which 20 consecutive responses on one of two levers resulted in food delivery. In both monkeys, etorphine (0.0001–0.0018), meperidine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg), morphine (0.1–3.2 mg/kg), and codeine (0.3–3.2) produced dose-related increases in the percentage of total session responses that occurred on the etorphine-appropriate lever. In contrast, ethylketazocine, SKF-10047, and pentazocine, at doses up to and including those that suppressed response rates, produced responses primarily on the saline-appropriate lever. Thus, etorphine-like narcotics, including morphine, have discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys which can be distinguished from those produced by narcotics with nonmorphine-like actions such as ethylketazocine, SKF-10047, and pentazocine.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, pregnanolone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in rats administered ethanol or saline as adolescents

Adolescent alcohol use may produce long-term changes in the receptors and neurosteroids that putatively mediate alcohol's effects and consequently contribute to alcohol abuse and dependence as an adult. To test this possibility, ethanol (0.18-1.8 g/kg) and two neurosteroids, pregnanolone (1-10 mg/kg) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, 1-100 mg/kg), were administered alone and in combination to adult, male Long-Evans rats discriminating 1 g/kg ethanol (15% v/v) under a fixed ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation after adolescent treatment with 15 injections of ethanol (n = 9, 2 g/kg, 20% v/v) or saline (n = 7). When compared as adults, ethanol-treated adolescents (as opposed to saline-treated adolescents) had higher percentages of ethanol-lever responding at doses smaller than the training dose, and higher response rates after both control and ethanol injections. Neither pregnanolone nor DHEA substituted for ethanol in either adolescent-treated group up to doses that substantially decreased response rates. When administered with ethanol, 1 and 3.2 mg/kg of pregnanolone enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses more in saline-treated adolescents than in ethanol-treated adolescents. Unlike pregnanolone, 32 and 100 mg/kg of DHEA attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol modestly in both adolescent-treated groups. These results in adult rats suggest that adolescent ethanol administration can enhance the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses and affect the capacity of pregnanolone, but not DHEA, to interact with ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of inhaled cocaine in squirrel monkeys

Squirrel monkeys (N=4) were trained with food reinforcement to press one of two levers after administration of IV cocaine (0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg) or the other lever after saline. After training, IV cocaine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) produced dose-related increases in the percentage of responses on the cocaine lever (ED₅₀=0.15 mg/kg). Cocaine delivered IM also produced dose-related increases in cocaine-appropriate responding (ED₅₀=0.32 mg/kg), but was approximately half as potent as IV cocaine. Similar relative potency relations were obtained for decreases in response rates produced by cocaine. Prior to some sessions subjects were placed in a Plexiglas^® chamber and exposed for 60 s to cocaine vapor created with an ultrasonic nebulizer. Exposure to vapor from cocaine solutions (1.0–30.0 mg/ml) produced concentration-dependent increases in cocaine-appropriate responding and decreases in response rates. Exposure to vapor from a 30 mg/ml concentration produced virtually exclusive cocaine-appropriate responding. Concentration-effect curves for inhaled cocaine were similar to dose-effect curves obtained when cocaine was administered by the other routes. The time course of the minimally effective concentration of inhaled cocaine was compared to that of the minimally effective doses of systemically administered cocaine. Inhaled cocaine had a duration of action longer than IV cocaine. The results indicate that inhaled cocaine vapor has effects qualitatively similar to those of IV cocaine, and may have a duration of action longer than that of an IV cocaine dose producing a similar degree of drug-appropriate responding.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of a nicotine-midazolam mixture in rats

Rats were trained to discriminate the effects of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg SC) plus midazolam (0.2 mg/kg SC) from those of saline in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure involving a tandem schedule of food reinforcement. After discrimination training, the component drugs of the mixture produced very considerable amounts of drug-appropriate responding when given separately. Mecamylamine and Ro 15-1788 only slightly attenuated the discriminative response to the mixture when given separately, but completely blocked the response when administered together. In different groups of rats trained to discriminate nicotine or midazolam separately from saline, neither drug appreciably altered the dose-response curve for the other, suggesting a minimal role for pharmacological interactions when effects of mixtures were assessed. The results suggest that the two components of a compound drug-produced stimulus can be perceived separately rather than being blended into a homogenous entity. Knowledge of the characteristics of compound drug-produced stimuli may aid interpretation of the discriminative effects of single drugs with wide spectra of action.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of intravenous nicotine in squirrel monkeys

Three squirrel monkeys were trained to emit one response after IV administration of nicotine (0.1 or 0.18 mg/kg depending on the subject) and a different response after IV administration of saline. Subjects emitted nicotine-appropriate responses with substitutions of higher doses, but only emitted saline-appropriate responses after substitutions of lower doses. Discrimination performance was then maintained at 0.1 mg/kg of nicotine in all subjects. Neither morphine nor cocaine substituted for the effects of nicotine in any subjects across a range of doses up to those that suppressed responding. Ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate, an inverse agonist at the benzodiazepine receptor, substituted or partially substituted for nicotine in both subjects in which it was studied.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of spiradoline,a kappa-opioid agonist

This study represents the initial step in assessing the discriminative effects of spiradoline (U62,066), a potent congener of the selective kappa-opioid agonist, U50,488. Separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate between SC injections of saline and either 3.0 mg/kg spiradoline or 3.0 mg/kg morphine in a discrete-trial shock-avoidance/escape procedure. Spiradoline-trained rats generalized completely to U50,488 (ED₅₀s for spiradoline and U50,488 were 0.66 and 8.71 mg/kg, respectively), but selected the choice lever appropriate for saline in generalization tests with graded doses of morphine, phencyclidine, and agonist-antagonist opioids with varying degrees of kappa activity, ethylketocyclazocine, nalorphine, and butorphanol. Morphine-trained rats did not generalize to spiradoline. Naltrexone (0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg) blocked surmountably the discriminative effects of both spiradoline and morphine, but was approximately 10-fold less potent against spiradoline. These results indicate that the discriminative effects of spiradoline are mediated by kappa-opioid receptors; meaningful mu-opioid and PCP/sigma components of action were not in evidence. The potency and apparent pharmacological selectivity of spiradoline suggest the potential value of this drug for studying kappa-opioid-mediated stimulus control of behavior.