Self-administered ethanol as a discriminative stimulus in rats.

The neurochemical and behavioral effects produced by drugs can differ based on whether self-administered or experimenter-administered. In addition, self-administered drugs, particularly those taken orally or by inhalation, have peripheral stimulus effects that are not present following experimenter administration. One drug with highly prominent peripheral stimulus effects when taken orally is ethanol. The purpose of the present experiment was to examine whether orally self-administered (SA) ethanol would serve as a discriminative stimulus and to determine if the peripheral effects of ethanol play a major role in the discriminative stimulus of orally SA ethanol. Twelve Long-Evans rats were trained to orally self-administer 750 mg/kg of 10% (w/v) ethanol and then discriminate that dose of ethanol from SA water. Six of twelve rats were successfully trained to discriminate oral SA ethanol from water. Intraperitoneal experimenter-administered and orally SA ethanol doses of 100-1320 mg/kg were tested for substitution. SA and i.p. ethanol doses of 750, 1000, and 1320 mg/kg fully substituted for the SA training dose. SA doses of 100, 320 and 560 mg/kg partially substituted for the SA ethanol training dose, whereas the 100 and 320 mg/kg i.p. ethanol doses did not substitute for SA ethanol. The ED(50) values for SA and i.p. ethanol were not significantly different from one another. The results indicate that SA ethanol can serve as a discriminative stimulus in rats and that i.p. ethanol can substitute for SA ethanol. In addition, the results also show that the discriminative stimulus effects of SA ethanol are primarily mediated by CNS drug effects.     

Serotonin involvement in the discriminative stimulus effects of mu and kappa opioids in rats

The role of serotonin (5-HT) in the discriminative stimulus effects of opioids was examined using a two-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. The effects of the 5-HT(1A) full agonist 8-OH-DPAT, the 5-HT(1A) partial agonist buspirone and the 5-HT(2) antagonist ketanserin were evaluated in rats trained to discriminate the mu opioid agonist morphine, or the kappa opioid agonist U50, 488 from saline. In rats trained to discriminate 5.6mg/kg of morphine from saline, morphine dose-dependently substituted (produced >/= 80% morphine-appropriate responding) for the morphine stimulus. In contrast, U50,488, 8-OH-DPAT and ketanserin did not substitute for morphine, and buspirone produced only a small degree of substitution (approx. 40% morphine-appropriate responding). When administered in combination with morphine, 8-OH-DPAT, but not buspirone and ketanserin, attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of higher doses of morphine. In rats trained to discriminate 5.6mg/kg of U50, 488 from saline, U50, 488 dose-dependently substituted for the U50, 488 stimulus. When administered alone, 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone partially substituted (produced between 40% and 79% U50, 488-appropriate responding) for the U50,488 stimulus, whereas morphine and ketanserin did not substitute for U50,488. The opioid antagonist naltrexone failed to antagonize the effects of 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone suggesting that the effects of these drugs in U50,488-trained rats were not mediated by opioid receptors. When administered in combination with U50,488, 8-OH-DPAT, but not buspirone or ketanserin, attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of the training dose of U50,488. These results suggest that the 5-HT system is involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of both morphine and U50,488, although the exact nature of this 5-HT involvement is not clear.     

The discriminative stimulus properties of self-administered ethanol are mediated by GABAA and NMDA receptors in rats

RATIONALE: The neurobiological systems that mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered drugs are largely unknown. The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate ethanol (1 g/kg, IP) from saline on a two-lever drug discrimination task with sucrose (10% w/v) reinforcement. Test sessions were conducted with ethanol (0 or 10% v/v) added to the sucrose reinforcement to determine if self-administered ethanol would interact with the discriminative stimulus effects of investigator-administered ethanol, or with the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of the GABAA-positive modulator pentobarbital or the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801. RESULTS: During a saline test session, ethanol (10% v/v) was added to the sucrose reinforcement. Responding by all animals began accurately on the saline-appropriate lever and then switched to the ethanol-appropriate lever after rats self-administered a mean dose of 1.2 +/- 0.14 g/kg ethanol. During cumulative self-administration trials, responding initially occurred on the saline lever and then switched to the ethanol-appropriate lever after ethanol (0.68 +/- 0.13 g/kg) was self-administered. Investigator-administered MK-801 (0.01-1.0 mg/kg, cumulative IP) and pentobarbital (0.3-10.0 mg/kg, cumulative IP) dose-dependently substituted for ethanol. When ethanol (10% v/v) was added to the sucrose reinforcer, MK-801 and pentobarbital dose-response curves were shifted significantly to the left. CONCLUSIONS: Self-administered ethanol substituted for and potentiated the stimulus effects of investigator-administered ethanol, suggesting that the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol are similar to those produced by investigator-administered ethanol. Self-administered ethanol enhanced the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of MK-801 and pentobarbital, which suggests that the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol are mediated by NMDA and GABAA receptors.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, pregnanolone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in rats administered ethanol or saline as adolescents

Adolescent alcohol use may produce long-term changes in the receptors and neurosteroids that putatively mediate alcohol's effects and consequently contribute to alcohol abuse and dependence as an adult. To test this possibility, ethanol (0.18-1.8 g/kg) and two neurosteroids, pregnanolone (1-10 mg/kg) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, 1-100 mg/kg), were administered alone and in combination to adult, male Long-Evans rats discriminating 1 g/kg ethanol (15% v/v) under a fixed ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation after adolescent treatment with 15 injections of ethanol (n = 9, 2 g/kg, 20% v/v) or saline (n = 7). When compared as adults, ethanol-treated adolescents (as opposed to saline-treated adolescents) had higher percentages of ethanol-lever responding at doses smaller than the training dose, and higher response rates after both control and ethanol injections. Neither pregnanolone nor DHEA substituted for ethanol in either adolescent-treated group up to doses that substantially decreased response rates. When administered with ethanol, 1 and 3.2 mg/kg of pregnanolone enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses more in saline-treated adolescents than in ethanol-treated adolescents. Unlike pregnanolone, 32 and 100 mg/kg of DHEA attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol modestly in both adolescent-treated groups. These results in adult rats suggest that adolescent ethanol administration can enhance the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses and affect the capacity of pregnanolone, but not DHEA, to interact with ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects.     

Effects of ethanol on cocaine discrimination in rats

Ethanol and cocaine are frequently abused in combination, but little is known about how the subjective effects of the two drugs interact. The ability of ethanol and other GABA(A)-active compounds to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine was tested. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg ip) from saline using either single- or cumulative-dosing methods. In single-dose testing, ethanol (0.1-0.5 g/kg) dose-dependently decreased cocaine-appropriate responding following the training dose of cocaine. Ethanol (0.5 g/kg) produced a rightward shift in the cocaine cumulative dose-effect curve. Ethanol (0.1-1.0 g/kg) failed to substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and the higher doses (1-2 g/kg) completely suppressed responding. Indirect GABA(A) agonists diazepam (benzodiazepine site) and pentobarbital (barbiturate site) did not block the discriminative stimulus effects of cumulative doses of cocaine. The GABA(A) antagonist pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) (10-40 mg/kg) did not substitute for cocaine. These findings suggest that ethanol can modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, and that these effects may not be mediated by the actions of ethanol at the GABA(A) receptor.     

Differentiating the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate and ethanol in a three-choice drug discrimination procedure in rats

Anecdotal reports indicate that GHB produces subjective effects similar to those of ethanol. However, recent investigations comparing the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB to those of ethanol suggest that the subjective effects of these substances may differ considerably. To explore further potential differences between GHB and ethanol, 16 male Sprague–Dawley rats were trained in a three-lever drug discrimination procedure to discriminate ethanol (1.0 g/kg, experiment 1; 1.5 g/kg, experiment 2) and GHB (300 mg/kg) from vehicle. Dose–response functions determined with both training compounds revealed a clear dissociation between the discriminative stimulus effects of these drugs. As expected, the GHB precursors gamma-butyrolactone and 1,4-butanediol produced full substitution for GHB. In addition, the GABA_B receptor agonist baclofen substituted for GHB, whereas the benzodiazepine flunitrazepam and the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine engendered greater responding on the ethanol-lever. GHB's discriminative stimulus effects were blocked by the GABA_B receptor antagonist CGP-35348 but only partially blocked by the putative GHB receptor antagonist NCS 382. These findings are consistent with previous reports of GHB's discriminative stimulus effects in two-choice drug discrimination procedures and provide additional evidence that these effects are distinct from those of ethanol.     

Ethanol effects in pigeons trained to discriminate MK-801, PCP or CGS-19755

The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists MK-801, PCP and ketamine have recently been found to produce full drug-appropriate responding in pigeons trained to ethanol (1.5g/kg) in a two-key operant drug discrimination procedure. In the present study, ethanol (0.56-3.2g/kg i.g.) was administered to pigeons trained to discriminate MK-801 (0.18mg/kg, n = 5), PCP (1.0mg/kg, n = 4) or the competitive NMDA antagonist CGS-19755 (1.8mg/kg, n = 4) from vehicle. Up to doses that caused large reductions in response rates, ethanol produced only vehicle-appropriate responding in the pigeons trained to PCP and only low levels of drug-appropriate responding in pigeons trained to MK-801 and CGS-19755. The present results suggest there could be asymmetric generalization between the discriminative stimulus effects of i.g. ethanol and NMDA antagonists.     

Generalisation of ethanol with drug mixtures containing a positive modulator of the GABA(A) receptor and an NMDA antagonist

Ethanol is thought to produce its discriminative stimulus effect by actions on two or more neurotransmitter systems. To test this idea further, rats were trained to discriminate mixtures of two drugs from vehicle in two-lever procedures with food reinforcers presented on a tandem variable-interval fixed ratio schedule. After drug-appropriate responding with the training mixtures reached 85%, generalisation to ethanol was examined in extinction tests. Rats trained to discriminate a mixture of chlordiazepoxide (5.0 mg/kg, s. c.) plus dizocilpine (0.08 mg/kg, i.p.) yielded a mean of 76% drug-appropriate responding when tested with ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.g. ). However, when rats were trained with an 8.0 mg/kg dose of pentobarbitone in a mixture with 0.08 mg/kg of dizocilpine, the same dose of ethanol produced only 33% drug-appropriate responding. After retraining with pentobarbitone (12 mg/kg) plus dizocilpine (0.04 mg/kg), ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.g.) produced 75% drug-appropriate responding. Pentobarbitone and dizocilpine administered alone produced full, dose-related generalisation, but there was no generalisation to (+)-amphetamine (0.025-0.8 mg/kg, s.c.). Thus, ethanol substituted for mixtures in which the GABA(A)-modulatory component had equal or greater salience than the NMDA-antagonist component. Doses of ethanol that generalised with the drug mixtures always reduced overall rates of responding as compared with control rates. Nevertheless, these data provide further support for the hypothesis that ethanol produces a compound stimulus comprised of elements resembling the effects of positive modulators of GABA(A) receptors and those of NMDA antagonists.     

A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol,barbital, and phenobarbital in rats

Five different groups of rats were trained in a food-motivated, bar-pressing task to discriminate from the nondrug condition (physiologic saline, i.p.) the effects produced by i.p. injections of ethanol (330, 660, or 990 mg/kg), sodium barbital (80 mg/kg), or sodium phenobarbital (25 mg/kg). The establishment of highly effective discriminations required 20–40 training sessions for all drugs, with the exception that rats trained with 330 mg/kg of ethanol required 80–100 training sessions. After the drug-nondrug discriminations were well established, cross tests revealed that ethanol did not elicit drug-appropriate responding in the groups trained with sodium barbital or sodium in the groups trained with sodium barbital or sodium phenobarbital. However, both barbiturates elicited drug-approppriate responding to some extent in rats trained with ethanol as the discriminative stimulus. With barbital, the greatest generalization was observed in rats trained with the low dose of ethanol (330 mg/kg). The findings emphasize the need for the use of several training doses and for transfer tests in both directions when the stimulus effects of drugs are compared.A preliminary report of part of these findings was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Davis, California, 1975.     

Asymmetric generalization between the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and cocaine

The discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and cocaine were studied, alone and in combination, in rats. Two sets of rats were trained to press one lever when injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with either nicotine (0.1 mg/kg = 0.6 micromol/kg, Set 1) or cocaine (8.9 mg/kg base = 29.4 micromol/kg, Set 2), and another lever when injected with saline. Rats learned to discriminate drug from saline, and maintained discriminative control throughout the study (at > 85% drug-appropriate responding). In accordance with most previous findings, cocaine only partially substituted for nicotine (maximum = 41% nicotine-lever responding). The nicotinic agonist, nornicotine, produced dose-related, near-full substitution for nicotine (maximum = 76% nicotine-lever responding), whereas the peripherally acting nicotinic agonist, methylcarbamylcholine, did not substitute for nicotine. The muscarinic receptor agonist pilocarpine also failed to substitute for nicotine. However, in the cocaine-trained rats, nicotine substituted fully for cocaine in a dose-dependent manner, demonstrating that cross-generalization between the two drugs is not symmetrical. Finally, administration of each drug as a pre-treatment to the other yielded inconsistent increases in each drug's discriminative stimulus effects. The results are congruent with the view that the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and cocaine share common features, but the asymmetric pattern of cross-generalization and the interactions revealed in the combination tests also suggest that there are important differences between them.     

The 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) enhances the discriminative stimulus actions of (+)amphetamine in rats

The effect of the 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) was examined on the discriminative stimulus produced by (+)amphetamine. Using male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg (i.p.) of (+)amphetamine from saline vehicle (VI 15-s schedule of reinforcement) in a two-lever operant procedure for appetitive reward, tests of stimulus generalization (substitution) and antagonism showed that MD-354 neither substituted for, nor antagonized, the amphetamine stimulus at the doses evaluated. Administration of (+)amphetamine doses in combination with a fixed (i.e., 1.0 mg/kg) dose of MD-354 shifted the (+)amphetamine dose-response curve to the left such that, following 0.3 mg/kg of (+)amphetamine, stimulus generalization occurred. Furthermore, MD-354 doses of 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg, but not doses of 0.01, 0.5, 1.5 or 3.0 mg/kg (i.p.), administered in combination with the ED(50) dose (0.33 mg/kg) of (+)amphetamine resulted in stimulus generalization (i.e., >80% drug-appropriate responding). It is concluded that even though MD-354 lacks amphetamine-like central stimulant actions of its own it can modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)amphetamine in rats.     

The discriminative stimulus properties of U50,488 and morphine are not shared by fedotozine

Fedotozine is a kappa opioid receptor agonist having antinociceptive properties but devoid of diuretic effects. The aim of the study was to evaluate the discriminative stimulus effects of fedotozine at doses previously reported to produce maximal effects in in vivo assays measuring kappa-mediated analgesia. By using a two-lever drug discrimination task, two groups of rats were trained to discriminate either a 3 mg/kg i.p. dose of the kappa opioid agonist, U50,488, or a 5 mg/kg i.p. dose of the mu opioid agonist, morphine, from saline. Once trained, rats were used to conduct tests of stimulus generalization with morphine, U50,488 and fedotozine along with another kappa agonist, CI-977, and another mu agonist, fentanyl. The stimulus effect of U50,488 was shared by CI-977 but not by morphine. Conversely, the stimulus effect of morphine was shared by fentanyl but not by U50,488. Fedotozine (1–10 mg/kg) failed to substitute to either U50,488 or morphine. These results indicate that, when administered at doses fully effective in producing antinociception, the interoceptive stimulus effects of fedotozine, if any, can be distinguished from those produced by U50,488 and morphine.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: lack of interaction with taurine

Recent microdialysis studies showed that ethanol administration increases the release of taurine in various rat brain regions, and it was suggested that this increase in extracellular concentrations of taurine might mediate some of the neurochemical effects of ethanol. Previous drug discrimination studies showed that positive modulators of the GABA(A) receptor consistently substituted for ethanol discriminative stimulus effects. Since taurine is also believed to modulate GABA(A) receptor activity, this study addressed the hypothesis that taurine mediates the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol due to GABA(A) activation. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate water from either 1 or 2 g/kg ethanol. In a first experiment, various taurine doses (0-500 mg/kg) were tested to investigate whether taurine substitutes for ethanol. In a second experiment, rats were pretreated with either 500 mg/kg taurine or an equivalent volume of saline before testing for ethanol discrimination with various ethanol doses (0-2.0 g/kg). The results showed that taurine does not substitute for ethanol at any tested doses. In addition, taurine pretreatments failed to modify the dose-response curve for ethanol discrimination. These results demonstrate that taurine is not directly involved in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. It is therefore very unlikely that the brain release of taurine observed after ethanol administration is implicated in the major pharmacological effects of ethanol, i.e. positive modulation of GABA(A) receptor, that mediate its discriminative stimulus effects.     

The stimulus properties of morphine and ethanol

The present investigation sought (a) to establish the efficacy of morphine and ethanol as discriminative stimuli when each is paired with the administration of saline and (b) to compare, in a qualitative sense, the stimulus properties of the two drugs. Additional experiments examined the effects of treatment with naloxone or l-propranolol upon morphine and ethanol-mediated discriminated responding. Finally, the stereospecificity of the stimuli produced by morphine was determined by a comparison, in morphine-trained rats, of levorphanol and dextrorphan. Discriminated responding developed rapidly in both the morphine and ethanol groups. In tests in which ethanol was administered to morphine-trained animals and vice versa, no similarity to stimulus properties was apparent. Antagonism of discriminated responding induced by morphine and ethanol was attempted using naloxone and l-propranolol. Naloxone blocked the actions of morphine but was without effect upon ethanol. No evidence of antagonism of either drug by propranolol was found. When a range of doses of levorphanol (0.1–3 mg/kg) and dextrorphan (3–100 mg/kg) was tested in morphine trained animals, only levorphanol was able to substitute for morphine. The present results suggest that the stimulus properties of morphine represent typical opiate effects.     

Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate agonists and antagonists in rats discriminating amphetamine.

The present study assessed the interactions between N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) agonists or antagonists and the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.) of amphetamine from saline under a two-lever fixed-ratio schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions, i.p. injections of the glycine site agonist D-cycloserine, the ion-channel blocker dizocilpine and the competitive antagonist CGP 43487 were coadministered with i.p. saline or with a full range of doses of amphetamine. D-Cycloserine did not substitute for amphetamine and attenuated the cueing effects of the drug. Both dizocilpine and CGP 43487 engendered intermediate levels of amphetamine-appropriate responses and potentiated the stimulus properties of amphetamine; however, the effects of CGP 43487 were very small and not dose-dependent. In an ancillary experiment, the training dose of amphetamine was reduced to 0.25mg/kg; under these conditions dizocilpine, but not CGP 43487, produced full substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine. These results show that drugs affecting NMDA receptor-based neurotransmission can modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine.     

The discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists in phencyclidine-trained rats

The discriminative stimulus effects of two competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoate (APH) and 3-[(+-)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl]propyl-1-phosphonate (CPP), were assessed in rats trained to discriminate phencyclidine from saline. Systemically administered APH (10-60 mg/kg i.p.) failed to elicit phencyclidine-lever responding; however, partial generalization from phencyclidine occurred following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of APH (1.5-30 micrograms). Systemic and central administration of CPP (3-30 mg/kg i.p.; 0.1-10 micrograms i.c.v.) also resulted in partial generalization from phencyclidine. Partial generalization was also obtained with methohexital (5-30 mg/kg i.p.). However, generalization to APH, CPP and methohexital was usually accompanied by decreased response rates, and response rate decreases frequently occurred without appreciable phencyclidine-lever selection, indicating that these drugs also had no phencyclidine-like behavioral effects. The drug di-ortho-tolyl guanidine (DTG) which binds with high-affinity to sigma receptors failed to elicit phencyclidine-lever responding, even at doses which reduced response rates. These findings suggest that although competitive NMDA antagonists share some discriminative stimulus properties with phencyclidine, there is not a complete overlap in the discriminative stimulus properties of competitive and non-competitive NMDA antagonists. Furthermore, the discriminative stimulus effects of APH and CPP were no more similar to phencyclidine than those of methohexital.     

Drug discrimination analysis of ethanol as an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist.

Ethanol has been shown to antagonize N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated neurotransmission in a number of in vitro systems. Drug discrimination procedures in rats were used to evaluate ethanol as an antagonist of NMDA discrimination and for its ability to produce discriminative stimulus effects similar to those of competitive and noncompetitive NMDA antagonists. Ethanol (300-1500 mg/kg i.p.) failed to antagonize the stimulus effects of 30 mg/kg NMDA, nor did it substitute fully for either the competitive antagonist NPC 12626 nor the noncompetitive antagonist phencyclidine (PCP). A maximum average of 55.4% PCP-lever responding provided evidence for partial substitution in this model. The effects of ethanol on NMDA discrimination are distinct from those previously reported for competitive NMDA antagonists but similar to those of noncompetitive antagonists. On the other hand, ethanol can be distinguished from both competitive and PCP-like noncompetitive NMDA antagonists using drug discrimination procedures.     

Pharmacological specificity of the caffeine discriminative stimulus in humans: effects of theophylline, methylphenidate and buspirone

The present study examined further the pharmacological specificity of the methylxanthine CNS stimulant caffeine as a discriminative stimulus in humans. Nine normal healthy volunteers (ages 19-39) were trained to discriminate between caffeine (320mg/70kg, p.o.) and placebo, using monetary reinforcement of correct letter code identification. After four training sessions, subjects were tested with the training conditions until they were >80% correct on four consecutive sessions. Then dose-effect curves were determined for caffeine (56-320mg/70kg), theophylline (56-320mg/70kg), methylphenidate (10-56mg/70kg), and buspirone (1-32mg/70kg). Seven of nine subjects met the discrimination criterion within four to nine sessions. During dose-effect curve determinations, caffeine and methylphenidate each produced dose-related increases in caffeine-appropriate responding. Theophylline produced caffeine-appropriate responding that was not dose related in a consistent manner across subjects, occasioning an average of 50% caffeine-appropriate responding at most doses tested. Buspirone produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding. Caffeine-appropriate responding tended to be directly related to ARCI LSD scores, self-reported "bad" effects, "high", and stimulant-bad effects and inversely related to ARCI PCAG scores and sedative ratings. These results agree with non-human data and suggest that the caffeine discriminative stimulus has pharmacological specificity, in that caffeine-appropriate responding generalizes to other stimulants such as theophylline or methylphenidate, but not to non-stimulant compounds such as buspirone.     

Nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat: effects of ethanol

It has been shown that small doses of ethanol antagonise the discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine in the rat. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether ethanol could antagonise the aversive stimulus effects of nicotine. Wistar rats were trained to associate nicotine injections with a novel tasting fluid (0.1% saccharin) in the conditioned taste aversion procedure. Nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) was injected 5 min after the end of a 20-min exposure to the saccharin solution. Ethanol (0.25-0.5 g/kg, i.p.) was administered 5 or 50 min before nicotine. In general, ethanol did not inhibit nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. Contrary to the findings in drug discrimination studies, a slight but significant enhancement of nicotine-induced taste aversion conditioning was observed after ethanol pre-treatment. Blood ethanol levels were measured in a separate group of rats. Maximal blood ethanol levels after i.p. administration of 0.25 or 0.5 g/kg ethanol exceeded 20 and 80 mg%, respectively. Concluding, the present results may indicate that ethanol does not attenuate nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat.     

Modulation of the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam and phencyclidine by L-type voltage-gated calcium-channel ligands in rats

Rationale: Administration of voltage-gated calcium-channel (VGCC) modulators with ethanol can result in enhancement or attenuation of some behavioral effects of ethanol, including its discriminative stimulus effects. Objectives: The present study used a drug- discrimination paradigm to characterize modulation of the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of a γ-amino-butyric acid (GABA)_A and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) ligand by administration of VGCC ligands. Methods: Two groups of adult male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate either 1.0 g/kg ethanol (n=8) or 2.0 g/kg ethanol (n=9) from water under a fixed-ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation. Following training, ethanol substitution tests were conducted with cumulative doses of the GABA_A-positive modulator diazepam (0.3–10 mg/kg, i.p.) (DZP) and the uncompetitive NMDA antagonist phencyclidine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg, i.p.) (PCP). Next, a single dose of the VGCC antagonist nimodipine, nifedipine, isradipine, or the VGCC agonist (–)-BAY k 8644 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered prior to a cumulative DZP or PCP dose–response determination. Results: None of the VGCC modulators produced robust or consistent alterations in the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of DZP in animals trained with either 1.0 g/kg or 2.0 g/kg ethanol. However, the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of PCP were significantly enhanced in the presence of the VGCC antagonists and attenuated in the presence of the agonist in animals trained with 2.0 g/kg ethanol. Conclusions: Overall, these data show that VGCC modulation is not a robust component of ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of DZP in animals trained with 1.0 g/kg or 2.0 g/kg ethanol. However, the ethanol-like effects of PCP, particularly at higher training doses, appear to be modulated by dihydropyridine-sensitive VGCCs. Received: 26 August 1999 / Final version: 22 October 1999