Improved early detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions by combination of conventional Pap smear and speculoscopy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the addition of speculoscopy to a Pap smear in cervical cancer screening. METHODS: All women were screened using the Pap smear plus speculoscopy (PapSure) and colposcopy in the multicenter trial. The final diagnosis of each patient was based on a histological evaluation of the colposcopic target biopsy. Results were analyzed using a proportional compare test, sensitivity, specificity and predictive value with significant value determined at less than 0.05. RESULTS: Of 1,717 eligible cases, 26 cases had LGSIL and 16 cases had HGSIL. Of the Pap smears, five cases had LSIL and 14 cases had HGSIL. Of the combination of the PapSure, 23 cases had LGSIL and 16 cases had HGSIL. The sensitivity of the Pap smear to that of PapSure was calculated at 45.2% and 92.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The estimated cost to detect a cervical lesion using PapSure is less than that of the Pap smear. CONCLUSION: The addition of speculoscopy along with a Pap smear screening results in early detection of cervical lesions in comparison to the Pap smear alone. This screening combination is also more cost-effective and requires fewer visits to the clinic in comparison to a Pap smear screening alone.     

Can visual inspection with acetic acid be used as an alternative to Pap smear in screening cervical cancer?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in screening cervical cancer in comparison to Pap smear.Material and methods200 women attending the obstetric and gynecology Department in Zagazig University hospital from December 2011 to November 2012 were included. They were screened using Pap smear and VIA. Colposcopy was done for all women. Positive cases on any screening test were subjected to cervical biopsy.ResultsAcetic acid (VIA) was positive in 24/200 (12%) patients and Pap smear was abnormal in 8 (4%). There were 5 LSIL, 2 HSIL and one with cells suspicious of malignancy. Colposcopy was recorded abnormal in 35 cases (17.5) .18 cases (51.4%) had a Reid score of 0–2 and considered negative .17 cases (48.6%) had a positive colposcopy (Reid 3–8). Cervical biopsy was done on all 35 cases. 44% biopsies were positive and 56% were negative .15 positive biopsies incorporated 11 mild dysplasia, 2 moderate dysplasia, 1 sever dysplasia and one carcinoma in situ. The Pap smear had a sensitivity of 50.1%, specificity of 93.1%, and positive predictive value of 89.3% and negative predictive value of 65.6%. VIA had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 37%, and positive predictive value of 52% and negative predictive value of 81%.ConclusionVIA a good screening, simple test, has low cost and high sensitivity in comparison to Pap smear. So, it can be used as alternative screening modality for cervical cancer in low resource locations.     

Should the Pap smear be repeated at the first colposcopy visit?

AIM: To determine whether there is any benefit in repeating the Pap smear at the time of colposcopy in women referred to a teaching hospital dysplasia clinic. METHODS: Analysis of a computerised database, and review of literature. RESULTS: Repeating the Pap smear potentially changed management in 2% of women referred with low-grade lesions, and in 7% of those with high-grade lesions. CONCLUSION: Although the literature suggests that the repeat smear may directly affect the quality of the colposcopic examination, repeating the smear in women referred with high-grade squamous intraepithelial (HSIL) smears may be beneficial.     

Colposcopic evaluation after a repeat atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smear.

OBJECTIVES: Management of patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) remains controversial. We chose to repeat the Pap smear after four months. If ASCUS persisted in this second test, the patient was advised to undergo colposcopy. Our objective is to determine the clinical significance and the prediction of neoplasia among these patients through a colposcopic examination. METHODS: Of 29,827 patients who had a Pap smear, ASCUS were detected in 1387 (5%) and persisted in the repeat smear of 225 (16%). Colposcopy and an additional Pap smear were performed on 186 patients. RESULTS: Out of 186 colposcopic evaluations, 91 (49%) were normal and the patients had a negative Pap smear. Colposcopy was abnormal in 95/186 patients (51%) (Table 1). Histology of the directed biopsies revealed 38 (21%) low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and 17 (9%) high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Forty patients (21%) with normal biopsies had ASCUS for the third time in the Pap smear. CONCLUSIONS: Colposcopic evaluation after a repeated Pap smear with ASCUS is an appropriate cost-effective management. Finding 30% of LSIL or HSIL justifies this additional investigation.     

'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

BACKGROUND: Assess the value of colposcopic evaluation preceding loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conisation of cytological high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and study risk factors for recurrence. METHODS: Consecutive follow-up among women undergoing LEEP conisation from January 2001 to December 2004. RESULTS: Some 528 LEEP conisations were performed because of suspected or verified cervical dysplasia. On classified samples, cytology, punch biopsy and histopathology of the cone specimen showed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 or a higher degree in 48.5, 36.2 and 58.6%, respectively. Sensitivity for HSIL out of cytology and colposcopically directed punch biopsy was 74.4 and 73.3%, respectively. Likewise, among 286 women with all 3 samples, positive and negative predictive value for HSIL in Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and punch biopsy was 78.5, 73.2% and 60.3, 63.6%, respectively. Positive cone margins were found in 16.8%. Residual/recurrent disease, defined as any grade of dysplasia at cytological follow-up, was found among 9.4%. Significant risk for recurrent/residual disease was found among those with positive marginal status. Median time from colposcopy to conisation was 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: An immediate colposcopically-guided LEEP conisation after HSIL Pap smear may be a safe and time saving strategy. Positive cone margins are a risk factor for residual/recurrent disease.     

Relative risk of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion associated with prior abnormal Pap smears

OBJECTIVE: Pap smear frequency remains controversial, especially for women with consecutive negative smears. We undertook the current study to ascertain the association of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and prior abnormal Paps. STUDY DESIGN: Women with biopsy-proven HSIL (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3) diagnosed between September 1996 and December 1997 and age-matched controls with a negative Pap obtained during the same time period were selected. RESULTS: Sixty-three cases (mean age = 32 years) of HSIL and 69 controls (mean age = 33 years) constituted the study population. Any prior abnormal diagnosis conferred a 15-fold increased risk of HSIL on the current Pap (50/63 vs. 14/69, P < .0001). When limited to the 60 women with at least three prior Paps, the odds ratio for HSIL on the current Pap with any prior abnormal was 18 (28/31 vs. 10/29, P < .0001). Three cases had at least three consecutive negative Paps prior to the diagnosis of HSIL. CONCLUSION: Women with one or more prior negative Pap smears had a significantly decreased risk of HSIL on the current Pap. Consecutive negative Paps did not appear to further decrease the risk; 10% of HSIL patients had had three or more consecutive prior negative Paps. To detect HSIL at its earliest stage, women should be advised to continue annual Pap screening in spite of consecutive negative results.     

Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate new techniques in primary cervical cancer screening programmes. DESIGN: Cross sectional pilot study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital. POPULATION: Consecutive 2032 human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and Pap smear samples were taken. Histological diagnoses were obtained from 460 patients. METHODS: We compared the validity of the high risk (HR) HPV DNA detection test to automation-assisted and conventional Pap smear screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Specificity and sensitivity of screening methods. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of women were HPV positive. Forty-five of 46 had high grade lesions and cancers were HR HPV DNA positive, whereas 72/93 of low grade and more severe lesions were HR HPV DNA positive. When histologically verified high grade lesions were observed, the relative sensitivity of HR Hybrid Capture 2 (HR HC2) test was 98% compared with conventional Pap smear and Papnet tests, which performed 54%versus 58%, 83%versus 86% and 93%versus 98% relative sensitivity respectively, using cytological diagnoses HSIL (high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion), LSIL (low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) or ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) as the cutoff. The specificity of HC2 test (77-79%) was comparable with the ASCUS+ (ASCUS and more severe) cytology (68-79%), but lower when compared with LSIL+ (91-95%) or especially HSIL+ (97-99%) Pap smear results. CONCLUSION: Pap smear, as a screening test, is very different from HPV DNA detecting test HR HC 2. If cutoff LSIL or more severe lesions is used, primary Pap smear is clearly more specific than HR HC2, but markedly less sensitive. Due to high relative sensitivity of the HPV, only very few histologically confirmed high grade lesions would be detected among HPV negatives using simultaneous cytology. On the other hand, using HPV DNA test alone would lead to multifold amounts of referrals for colposcopy. A posterior Pap smear assessment among HPV positives might be helpful in increasing sensitivity and specificity of screening and defining those who need an immediate referral or treatment. We plan to incorporate primary HR HPV DNA test with posterior Pap smear reading of HPV positives into our ongoing randomised prospective multiarm trial evaluating new techniques in organised screening for cervical cancer in Finland.     

Interpreting epithelial cell abnormalities detected during cervical smear screening--a cytohistologic approach

PURPOSE: To determine the underlying pathology and clinical significance of epithelial cell abnormalities (ECA) identified during cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 19,215 Pap smears stained by Papanicolaou stain were screened during a 36-month period. They were classified according to The Bethesda System (TBS) for cervical cytology screening and the results of ECA were compared with histology. The chi square test was applied to determine the significance and validity of high-grade lesions on cytology diagnosis. RESULT: 360 cases of ECA were identified. Mean age at presentation was 50.58 years. Cytohistologic correlation of ECA was possible in n = 249 (69.17%) of cases. Out of these, 18 cases were negative, six were inflammatory, three were benign, and 222 cases showed pathology ranging from mild dysplasia to invasive carcinoma. The chi square test showed a highly significant predictive value (p < 0.001) for high-grade lesions detected on Pap smears. CONCLUSION: Pap smear results of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or invasive malignancy are highly reliable and the patient may be considered directly for therapeutic intervention. Of cytologically detected ASCUS cases 38.89% were diagnosed as CIN (1-3) on histology. Thus the management of these patients needs to be re-evaluated. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected in postmenopausal women signify an underlying pathology. These patients should be further investigated and followed to biopsy if necessary.     

Human papillomavirus testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

To assess the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and colposcopy in detection of cervical pathology. A series of 389 women referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal Pap smear had cervical swabs analyzed for oncogenic (high-risk [HR]) HPV types using Hybrid Capture II (HC2) assay. Loop electrical excision procedure cone biopsy (88%) or colposcopic biopsy (11%) was used as the gold standard. Of the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smears, 48% were positive for HR HPV, as compared to 76.3% of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) smears. HR HPV was detected in 66.7% and 90% of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and CIN2 (or higher), respectively. The sensitivity of the Pap smear using an ASCUS threshold in detecting high-grade CIN was 94.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 91-97%) and that of colposcopy 98.5% (95% CI: 95-99%). The respective specificities were 30% (95% CI: 17-28%) and 35.6% (CI: 29-42%). HC2 test had comparable sensitivity, 90% (95% CI: 85-93%), but higher specificity, 54.3% (95% CI: 47-61%). Combining HC2 test with Pap increased specificity, 66.7% and 41.3% for ASCUS and LSIL cutoff, respectively. The minor-abnormality threshold together with HC2 increased specificity of colposcopy with no changes in sensitivity. High viral load (>100 relative light unit/positive control) was associated with significant disease. HPV DNA testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of high-grade CIN in women with ASCUS or LSIL smears.     

Immediate colposcopic evaluation in postmenopausal women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology

Objective. To compare the final diagnosis among pre- and postmenopausal women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL) cervical smear results. Design. Retrospective, comparative study. Setting. Departments of obstetrics and gynecology in two teaching and research hospitals. Population. Data were evaluated on 712 women with LGSIL between April 2005 and April 2011. Methods. Results from 129 postmenopausal women with LGSIL were compared with 583 premenopausal women with a similar LGSIL result with respect to sociodemographic data and histopathology. Main outcome measures. Final clinicopathological diagnosis. Results. The mean age of the pre- and postmenopausal women was 37.2 and 52.5 years, respectively, and lesions of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse were detected by biopsy and/or endocervical curettage in 13.6 and 9.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the final diagnosis among pre- and postmenopausal women with LGSIL cytology (relative risk 1.43; 95% confidence interval 0.82-2.48; p= 0.19). Invasive cervical cancer was detected in three premenopausal (0.5%) and two postmenopausal women (1.6%). Conclusions. Cervical pre-invasive and invasive disease rates were similar in pre- and postmenopausal women with LGSIL cytology. For this reason, LGSIL in postmenopausal women should be considered more seriously, and colposcopic evaluation may be as acceptable an option in the management of LGSIL in this group of patients as it is with premenopausal women.     

Post-radiation Pap smear for Chinese patients with cervical cancer: a ten-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: To study the performance of routine follow-up Pap smears after curative radiotherapy (RT) for Chinese cervical cancer (CC) patients. METHODS: In 1996, 50 patients with non-metastatic CC received curative RT. Forty-six patients had routine follow-up Pap smears and constituted the study group. Details regarding clinical characteristics were retrospectively abstracted. Pap smear results were obtained via national Pap smear database linkage and chart review. The Pap smear results during recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed and compared with clinical outcomes to study the performance characteristics. RESULTS: After 34 (2 approximately 105) months' median follow-up, the clinical outcomes were isolated central recurrence (ICR), other recurrence (OR), and no evidence of disease (NED) for six, 20, and 20 patients, respectively. During 22 months' median RFS (range 2-105), 422 Pap smears (including missing data, n = 33) were performed. Most of the Pap smear results were within normal limits (65.8%) or benign (reactive changes or atrophy with inflammation) (25.2%). Atypical cells, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and carcinoma were found in ten (2.6%), 11 (2.8%), 11 (2.8%), and three (0.8%) specimens, respectively. Follow-up of the 21 atypical cells/LSIL smears among seven patients revealed five NED with normal/benign smears, one NED with HSIL and one OR with HSIL. Follow-up of the 11 HSIL smears among four patients revealed two ICR, one OR and one NED with HSIL. Follow-up of the three carcinoma smears revealed three ICR (one followed by HSIL in a repeat Pap smear before ICR). The sensitivity for the detection of ICR by carcinoma smears was 50%, with a specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. CONCLUSION: Few (approximately 3%) of the routine follow-up Pap smears after CC patients receiving curative RT were HSIL/carcinoma, but most (4/6) of these patients turned out to be ICR.     

Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) as a screening method for cervical lesions. METHODS: VIA and cytological smears were carried out on the cervices of non-pregnant women aged 30-60 years with no previous history of cervical cancer. Cervices with aceto white lesions or positive Pap smears, and one in ten negative cervices (control), were biopsied. RESULTS: 5010 women were enrolled, 4813 (96.1%) were screened. 4767 (99.%) had adequate cytology smears. 574 (11.9%) had colposcopy. 1743 biopsies were obtained of which 528 were controls. The sensitivity of VIA was 70.4% versus 47.7% for Pap smear. VIA specificity was 77.6% versus 94.2% for Pap smear; PPV for VIA was 44.0% versus 67.2% for Pap smear; and NPV for VIA was 91.3% versus 87.8% for Pap smear. CONCLUSIONS: VIA has acceptable test qualities and may in low resource settings be implemented as a large scale screening method.     

Contribution of combined colposcopy and cytology in cervical pathology

Aim: The regular Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is the cornerstone of women’s preventive healthcare. The introduction of the regular Pap smear as a screening tool for cervical cancer has markedly decreased the number of deaths from cervical cancer. During the past decade, however, the rate of death from cervical cancer has remained relatively static. This screening method is known to have a high percentage of false negative results. To improve the detection of cervical lesions using the Pap smear in screening, a number of adjunct procedures have been developed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of a magnified chemoluminescent screening examination (Colposcopy) combined with the Pap smear in detecting cervical abnormalities. Methods: We investigated a cohort of 58 subjects who have been forwarded for colposcopic evaluation due to referral cytology suggestive of persistent inflammatory process not otherwise specified, and cervical intraepithelial or invasive neoplasia, in Chania Colposcopic clinic. Results: The higher the lesion detected by cytology, the more severe the corresponding colposcopic impression viewed. Conclusion: The data presented here are in harmony with previous reports and share our experience in a Regional Community Hospital Colposcopy Clinic. An integrated cytology–colposcopy program facilitates the assessment and identification of women harboring cervical pathological conditions.     

Occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in generally healthy women with exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata

AIM: To disclose possible association between exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in generally healthy, sexually active women. METHODS: This retrospective study included 74 patients (study group) who were referred for laser vaporization therapy of exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata, and 88 asymptomatic volunteers without evidence of exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata (control group) who were referred for screening Papanicolaou (Pap) test cervical evaluation including colposcopy. The diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was based on Pap smear, colposcopy and/or biopsy. RESULTS: On Pap smear, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were found in 10 (13.5%) women with exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata and in 2 (2.3%) asymptomatic volunteers (p < 0.05). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was found in 8 women with exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata and in none of the asymptomatic volunteers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An association was found between exophytic vulvar condyloma acuminata and abnormal Pap smear or positive cervical biopsy, in generally healthy women.     

Proliferation in "atypical" atrophic pap smears

OBJECTIVE: Atrophic cervical epithelium of postmenopausal women may mimic high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3) in Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears (Pap smears). Women with such an "atypical" Pap smear need a repeated Pap smear after a course of estrogens before a definite diagnosis can be made. The aim of this study was to determine whether measurement of proliferative activity in Pap smears of postmenopausal patients that were difficult to interpret is a reliable test for differentiating between cervical atrophy and high-grade CIN. METHODS: Pap smears obtained before and after estrogen treatment of 30 postmenopausal women with an atypical Pap smear were restained with the monoclonal antibody MIB1 to visualize proliferating cells. The proliferative activity index (PAI) was subsequently measured in order to explore the feasibility of a recently proposed PAI-based diagnostic decision tree to reduce the number of estrogen courses and follow-up Pap smears in postmenopausal women. RESULTS: The PAI-based test to discriminate between cervical atrophy and high-grade CIN resulted in 100 and 96% correct diagnoses in women with high-grade CIN and cervical atrophy, respectively. Only 2 of the 30 women would have needed a repeated Pap smear after estrogen treatment for definite diagnosis if the PAI-based diagnostic decision had been used. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PAI in MIB1 restained Pap smears is a simple, reliable, safe, and probably also cost-effective method to obtain a substantial reduction of diagnostic estrogen courses and subsequent Pap smears in postmenopausal women with an atypical Pap smear.     

Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid for cervical intraepithelial lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) for screening cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: In this prospective study, 400 women were screened using the Papanicolaou (PAP) smear, VIA and colposcopy. Those who had positive results with any of the screening methods underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). The sensitivity and specificity of each of the screening methods was analyzed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of VIA (96.7%) was much higher than that of the Pap smear (50%), and almost as high as that of colposcopy (100%). The specificity of VIA (36.4%) was lower than that of the Pap smear (97%) and colposcopy (96.9%), resulting in high false-positive rates for VIA. Two cases of endocervical lesions were missed with VIA. CONCLUSION: Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid is very sensitive for ectocervical lesions. The advantages of the VIA method are its low cost and ease of use (it can be used by paramedical workers), its high sensitivity and its immediate results (it is possible to "see and treat" at the first visit). Its main limitation is a high rate of false-positive results, which may lead to overtreatment if a "see and treat" policy is applied.     

Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, after six months delay: A three-year experience in an Iranian university hospital

Background: A Pap test result of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) presents a clinical challenge. Only 5–10% of women with ASCUS harbour serious cervical disease.
Methods: We screened 3619 women, who attended to Mirza Koochak Khan Hospital at Tehran University of Medical Sciences with Pap smears, of whom 100 returned with ASCUS. After six months, each subject underwent a standard cytology (conventional Pap smear), human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing (identifying high-risk HPV types with polymerase chain reaction) and colposcopy with multiple cervical biopsies.
Results: Mean age was 44.09 ± 8.6 years. The estimated prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II or higher was 4%. When histologically verified high-grade lesions (≥ CIN II) were observed, the relative sensitivity of HPV DNA testing was 100% compared with conventional Pap smear, which performed 75% versus 100% relative sensitivity, respectively, using cytological diagnosis high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) as the cut-off. Negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of Pap test were 98.9% and 100%. The NPV and PPV of HPV DNA testing were 100%.
Conclusions: Although less complicated than colposcopy, the repeat Pap smear triage algorithm for ASCUS may underdiagnose some women with high-grade CIN, when compared with colposcopy. Considering the high sensitivity of HPV testing, it may be useful as an alternative to the current policy of six-month repeat cytology for women with ASCUS results.     

Correlation of cervical cytology and human papillomavirus DNA detection in postmenopausal women.

This study correlated the cytological features of cervical swabs from postmenopausal women with the histological findings and the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) using filter hybridization analysis. Of 17 postmenopausal women seen at colposcopy for an abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, most often squamous atypia, HPV DNA was detected in one (6%) cervical swab. Biopsy-proven cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) were noted in two of the 17 (12%). The HPV DNA detection rate was equivalent to that found in 47 postmenopausal women who had hysterectomies for noncervical disease. The rates of HPV detection and biopsy-proven SIL in premenopausal women seen at colposcopy was 55% and 66%, respectively. The HPV DNA detection rate for postmenopausal women with biopsy-proven SILs as determined by in situ hybridization was 19/26 (73%), which is equivalent to the rate in premenopausal women. It is concluded that squamous atypia in postmenopausal women is rarely associated with either biopsy-proven SIL or HPV DNA detection and thus, in many cases, may represent atrophic changes.     

Screening and treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in HIV-infected women

BACKGROUND: To determine: 1) whether the pathology correlates with the degree of immunosuppression, 2) whether there is a relation between pathology and antiretroviral therapies, 3) whether Papanicolau (Pap) smears correlate with colposcopic and histologic findings, 4) whether there is rapid genital disease progression after standard gynaecologic care. METHODS: Retrospective study. Immunologic, gynaecologic and virologic data were extracted either from patients charts or from laboratory testing. RESULTS: At first visit Pap smears resulted normal in 43.7% of the women, 8.4% of the patients had reactive and reparative changes, 2.8% atypical cells of undetermined significance, 33.8% low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 11.3% high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Patients with a normal PAP smear had higher CD4 cell count (318+/-191 cells/mL) compared to patients with squamous intraepithelial lesions (297+/-116 cells/mL) but the difference was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test). The distribution of cervical dysplasia was found to be similar regardless of antiretroviral therapy (chi(2) test). The sensitivity and specificity of Pap tests for detecting CIN were 94 and 80%. Twenty-two per cent of surgically treated women had persistent or recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Lower CD4+ cell counts are not predictive of the presence of cervical dysplasia. All HIV-infected women, independently from their immunological and clinical conditions, need regular Pap smears with appropriate follow-up for abnormal cervicovaginal cytology, this could prevent nearly all deaths from cervical cancer.     

绝经后女性宫颈癌前病变筛查方法的比较

目的：探讨绝经后女性宫颈细胞学与人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）检测在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的作用。方法：回顾性分析2017年10月—2018年9月于天津市第一中心医院妇科门诊因宫颈筛查异常行阴道镜下活检的113例绝经后女性,分析不同宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查（TCT）及高危型HPV（HR-HPV）结果对宫颈病变检出的情况,比较组织学高度鳞状上皮内病变（HSIL）中宫颈TCT和HPV检测的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果：绝经后女性HR-HPV感染分布与宫颈病变分布差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.809,P=0.303）。细胞学高风险组中组织学CINⅡ+的检出率高于低风险组（χ2=29.018,P=0.000）;宫颈活检组织学病变程度与宫颈细胞学严重程度呈弱正相关（r=0.389,P=0.000）。免疫组织化学（免疫组化）阳性组中宫颈高级别病变分布情况高于阴性组,差异有统计学意义（P=0.000）。绝经后女性宫颈TCT和HR-HPV筛查方法的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78.38%、75.00%、60.42%、87.69%和94.59%、10.13%、33.98%、80.00%。结论：宫颈TCT级别高、免疫组化阳性的绝经后女性有宫颈高级别病变的风险,需引起临床医师的关注。