The role of isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral complex injury

Purpose

This is a meta-analysis comparing biomechanical outcomes to determine whether an isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction can restore normal knee kinematics in a combined PCL/posterolateral complex (PLC) injury and whether double-bundle (DB) PCL reconstruction is superior in controlling posterior and rotational laxity compared with single-bundle (SB) PCL reconstruction in a PCL/PLC-deficient knee.

Methods

A number of electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published through August 2016 that compared biomechanical outcomes of PCL reconstruction in patients who underwent reconstruction for combined PCL/PLC deficiencies. Data were searched, extracted, analysed, and assessed for quality according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, and biomechanical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome values. The results are presented as relative ratios for binary outcomes and standard mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Five biomechanical studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in laxities such as posterior tibial translation (PTT), external rotation, varus rotation, and PTT coupled with external rotation in the isolated PCL reconstruction group compared with the native PCL group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in laxities such as PTT, external rotation, or varus rotation between the SB and DB PCL reconstruction groups.

Conclusion

Isolated PCL reconstruction, whether SB or DB, could not restore normal knee kinematics in the PCL/PLC-deficient knee. In such cases, residual laxity after isolated PCL reconstruction can be controlled successfully with PLC reconstruction. Therefore, simultaneous PCL and PLC reconstruction is recommended for patients with combined PCL/PLC injury.

     

Combined reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament using a single femoral tunnel

Purpose

Lesions of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) are the most common knee ligament injuries, and lesions associated with the anterior cruciate ligament or the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in knee dislocations should be reconstructed to prevent failure of the central pivot reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of combined PCL/MCL reconstruction using a single femoral tunnel with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Method

A retrospective study of thirteen patients with combined PCL/MCL injuries was conducted. The patients underwent PCL and MCL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with a single tunnel in the medial femoral condyle, thereby avoiding tunnel conversion.

Results

All patients achieved a range of motion of at least 100°. The mean loss of extension and flexion values compared to the contralateral side was 1° ± 2° and 9° ± 10°, respectively. Our results included 26 reconstructions with three (11.5 %) failures, two in the PCL (15.3 %) and one in the MCL (7.6 %), in three different patients. In the final evaluation, the mean IKDC subjective score was 71.63 ± 16.23, the mean Lysholm score was 80.08 ± 13.87, and the median Tegner score was 6 (range = 2–7).

Conclusion

The PCL/MCL reconstruction technique using a single femoral tunnel and an Achilles tendon allograft is safe, avoids the convergence of tunnels in the medial femoral condyle, has excellent results, and is reproducible.

Level of evidence

IV.

     

Combined ACL reconstruction and closing-wedge HTO for varus angulated ACL-deficient knees

Purpose

To report the medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a group of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery combined with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus-related early medial osteoarthritis (OA) and ACL deficiency knee.

Methods

Thirty-two patients underwent single-bundle over-the-top ACL reconstruction or revision surgery and a concomitant closing-wedge lateral HTO. The mean age at surgery was 40.1 ± 8.1 years. Evaluation at a mean of 6.5 ± 2.7 years of follow-up consisted of subjective and objective IKDC, Tegner Activity Level, EQ-5D, VAS for pain and AP laxity assessment with KT-1000 arthrometer. Limb alignment and OA changes were evaluated on radiographs.

Results

All scores significantly improved from pre-operative status to final follow-up. KT-1000 evaluation showed a mean side-to-side difference of 2.2 ± 1.0 mm. Two patients were considered as failures. The mean correction of the limb alignment was 5.6° ± 2.8°. Posterior tibial slope decreased at a mean of 1.2° ± 0.9°. At final follow-up, the mechanical axes crossed the medial–lateral length of tibial plateau at a mean of 56 ± 23 %, with only 1 patient (3 %) presenting severe varus alignment. OA progression was recorded only on the medial compartment (p = 0.0230), with severe medial OA in 22 % of the patients. No patients underwent osteotomy revision, ACL revision, UKA or TKA.

Conclusions

The described technique allowed patients with medial OA, varus alignment and chronic ACL deficiency to restore knee laxity, correct alignment and resume a recreational level of activity at 6.5 years of follow-up.

Level of evidence

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.     

Comparison of Achilles and tibialis anterior tendon allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts and tibialis anterior (TA) tendon allografts with respect to objective knee testing measures, second-look arthroscopy and femoral tunnel enlargement.

Methods

A total of 131 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2000 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Achilles tendon allografts were used in 81 patients (group I). These patients were compared with 50 patients in whom TA tendon allografts were used (group II). The two groups were assessed using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner activity scores, as well as KT-2000 testing. Second-look arthroscopic findings were evaluated. Cross-sectional area (CSA) perpendicular to the long axis of the femoral tunnel was also calculated digitally using magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to IKDC, Lysholm or Tegner activity scores or the results of laxity testing with arthrometry. Synovial coverage of more than 50 % was found in 71.1 % cases in group I and 75 % cases in group II. Mean CSA enlargement of 15 % (group I) and 38 % (group II) was detected (p = 0.017).

Conclusions

The clinical results associated with Achilles and TA tendons were not significantly different. The laxity evaluation and second-look arthroscopy demonstrated no significant differences between group I and group II. However, Achilles tendon-bone plugs for femoral tunnel fixation reduced femoral tunnel enlargement compared to the TA allograft. Achilles tendon allografts for ACL reconstruction could be a reasonable option in selected patients.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series, Level IV.     

Long-term results after reconstruction of the ACL with hamstrings autograft and transtibial femoral drilling

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term clinical, patient-reported and radiological outcome of patients reconstructed for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. We wanted to examine the relationship between clinical findings and patient-reported scores.

Methods

The 96 first successive patients that underwent ACL reconstruction using transtibial technique, hamstrings autograft and tunnel placement ad modum Howell were evaluated 10 years post-operatively. Subjective outcomes were Lysholm score, IKDC 2000 subjective score and Tegner activity scale. The clinical examination included evaluation of rotational and sagittal laxity. Evaluation of osteoarthritis was done radiologically.

Results

Eighty-three patients (86 %) were available for follow-up at mean 10.2 years post-operatively. Three patients had revision ACL surgery prior to the 10-year evaluation. The mean Lysholm score, subjective IKDC 2000 score and Tegner activity scale were 89 (SD 13), 83 (SD 15) and 5 (range, 3–9), respectively. Six patients (8 %) had moderate or severe osteoarthritis. Eighty-six per cent of patients had normal or near-normal anterior–posterior ACL laxity. Twenty per cent of patients had positive pivot shift and 42 % had a pivot glide. The former group had a significant lower Lysholm score compared to the rest of the patients.

Conclusions

Although the mean Lysholm score was classified as good (89) at the 10-year follow-up, a positive pivot shift was found in 20 % of these patients. Compared to patients with normal rotational laxity or pivot glide, this patient group reported significant lower subjective satisfaction at the long-term follow-up.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.     

Single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine a developed surgical technique by performing a mid-term evaluation of clinical and stability results and complications.

Methods

Thirty patients who underwent transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation method were enrolled in this prospective study. Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee scales were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Stability was evaluated using a Telos device with a 150 N force at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed in 20 (66.7%) patients, and complications were evaluated. Those with complication by MRI were assigned to an abnormal MRI group.

Results

The follow-up period was 47 (range, 25–62) months. On comparing preoperative and final follow-up clinical results, Lysholm and IKDC knee scale scores were found to have improved significantly (P < 0.001). The mean side-to-side difference in posterior translation measured using a Telos device was 13.4 ± 3.1 mm (range 10–20 mm) preoperatively and 3.2 ± 1.5 mm (range 1–7 mm) at last follow-up, which represented a significant improvement in stability (P < 0.001). Five patients showed cyst formation in the tibial tunnel and two patients showed a significant signal increase at the anterior portion of the tibial tunnel, which was believed to indicate a pro-cystic status. The normal and abnormal MRI groups had similar Lysholm and IKDC knee scale scores and stress radiographs (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Single-bundle transtibial PCL reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation was found to produce satisfactory clinical and stability results. However, despite these satisfactory results, a potential complication of tibial cyst formation was observed.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.     

Roles of ACL remnants in knee stability

Purpose

This study evaluated knee laxity in anterior tibial translation and rotation following removal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants using a computer navigation system.

Methods

This prospective study included 50 knees undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a navigation system. ACL remnants were classified into four morphologic types: Type 1, bridging between the roof of the intercondylar notch and tibia; Type 2, bridging between the posterior cruciate ligament and tibia; Type 3, bridging between the anatomical insertions of the ACL on the lateral wall of the femoral condyle and the tibia; and Type 4, no bridging of ACL remnants. Anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity were measured before and after remnant resection using a navigation system at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The amount of change in anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity of each type was compared among the types.

Results

The different morphologic types of ACL remnants were as follows: Type 1, 15 knees; Type 2, 9 knees; Type 3, 6 knees; and Type 4, 20 knees. The amount of change in anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity at 30° knee flexion in Type 3 was significantly larger than in the other types. There were no significant differences in either tibial translation or rotatory laxity at 60° and 90° knee flexion among the types.

Conclusions

In Type 3, ACL remnants contributed to anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity evaluated at 30° knee flexion. The bridging point of the remnants is important to knee laxity. The Type 3 remnant should be preserved as much as possible when ACL reconstruction surgery is performed.

Level of evidence

Prognostic study, Level II.     

A historical perspective of PCL bracing

Purpose

Currently there are many functional knee braces but very few designed to treat the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). No PCL braces have been biomechanically validated to demonstrate that they provide stability with proper force distribution to the PCL-deficient knee. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the history and current state of PCL bracing and to identify areas where further progress is required to improve patient outcomes and treatment options.

Methods

A PubMed search was conducted with the terms “posterior cruciate ligament”, “rehabilitation”, “history”, “knee”, and “brace”, and the relevant articles from 1967 to 2011 were analysed. A review of the current available PCL knee bracing options was performed.

Results

Little evidence exists from the eight relevant articles to support the biomechanical efficacy of nonoperative and postoperative PCL bracing protocols. Clinical outcomes reported improvements in reducing PCL laxity with anterior directed forces to the tibia during healing following PCL tears. Biomechanics research demonstrates that during knee flexion, the PCL experiences variable tensile forces. One knee brace has been specifically designed and clinically validated to improve stability in PCL-deficient knees during rehabilitation. While available PCL braces demonstrate beneficial patient outcomes, they lack evidence validating their biomechanical effectiveness.

Conclusions

There is limited information evaluating the specific effectiveness of PCL knee braces. A properly designed PCL brace should apply correct anatomic joint forces that vary with the knee flexion angle and also provide adjustability to satisfy the demands of various activities. No braces are currently available with biomechanical evidence that satisfies these requirements.

Level of evidence

IV.     

Long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft

Purpose

To investigate the differences in the incidence and severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA), joint space narrowing, knee laxity, and knee flexion and extension strength between an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knee and the contralateral non-reconstructed limb.

Methods

Retrospective case series of patients from a single surgeon that had an ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosus/gracilis autograft more than 12 years ago. Outcome measures included radiographic analysis, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), KT-1000, Tegner Activity Level Scale, Lysholm Knee Score, ACL quality of life score (ACL-QOL) and knee flexor/extensor strength.

Results

Seventy-four patients consented and sixty-eight (43 male, 25 female) were included for analysis. Average age (SD) at the time of surgery was 31.2 (±9.1) years. At follow-up of 14.6 (1.9) years, 9 % had re-ruptured their ACL, whereas 5 % ruptured the contralateral ACL. Reconstructed knees had a greater incidence and severity of OA (P < 0.01). Medial meniscus surgery was a strong predictor of OA. Seventy-five per cent scored a normal or nearly normal knee on the IKDC. The mean Lysholm score was 75.8 % and Tegner Activity Level Scale scores decreased (P < 0.001) from the time of surgery. Knee extension strength was greater in the contralateral knee at speeds of 60°/s (P = 0.014) and 150°/s (P = 0.012).

Conclusions

Reconstructed knees have a greater incidence and severity of OA than non-reconstructed knees, which suggests degenerative changes are secondary to ACL rupture. Medial meniscus surgery is a strong predictor of OA. Despite this, 75 % of patients reported good outcomes.     

How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut?

Purpose

There are two different techniques for retaining the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty. The attachment of the PCL can be spared during resection of the tibial plateau, so that a small posterior bone block remains. In contrast to this, many surgeons resect the tibial plateau completely and detach a part of the tibial PCL attachment from the resected material. The objective of this study was to determine how big this part is in an anatomical resection of the tibial plateau with 0° and 7° slope and whether it is gender-dependent.

Methods

Two hundred consecutive patients who had undergone MRI of a knee joint were included. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18?years or had dysplasia of the knee joint or injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. The MRIs of 182 knees that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analysed. For each knee, an anatomical tibial resection with 0° and 7° posterior slope was simulated, and the parts of the tibial PCL attachment that were resected and retained were determined.

Results

Given a measured tibial resection with 0° slope, 45 ± 28% of the tibial PCL attachment was removed in the men, compared with 46 ± 30% in the women (n.s.). Given a resection with 7° slope, 69 ± 24% of the tibial PCL attachment was removed in the men and 67 ± 25% in the women. This corresponded to a complete resection in 19 men (20%) and 16 women (24%).

Conclusions

Independently of gender, the anatomical resection of the tibia leads to the removal of a considerable part of the tibial PCL attachment, if this is not spared in the form of a bone block during resection. This becomes increasingly relevant with higher posterior slope of the resection plane. In the case of a cruciate-retaining surgical technique, the retention of the posterior tibial cortical bone in the area of attachment of the PCL is therefore strongly recommended.

Level of evidence

II.     

Effects of Wii balance board exercises on balance after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

To establish the effects of training on Wii balance board (WBB) after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction on balance.

Methods

Included patient injured her posterior cruciate ligament 22 months prior to the study. Training on WBB was performed 4 weeks, 6 times per week, 30–45 min per day. Center of pressure (CoP) sway during parallel and one-leg stance, and body weight distribution in parallel stance were measured. Additionally, measurements of joint range of motion and limb circumferences were taken before and after training.

Results

After training, the body weight was almost equally distributed on both legs. Decrease in CoP sway was most significant for one-leg stance with each leg on compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The knee joint range of motion increased and limb circumferences decreased.

Conclusion

According to the results of this single case report, we might recommend the use of WBB for balance training after PCL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.     

Complications after epiphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in prepubescent children

Purpose

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remains a major concern in the prepubescent, skeletally immature patient with wide open growth plates. Different surgical techniques have been proposed. This study reports the results and complications of ACL reconstruction in young children using an all epiphyseal technique.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2010, 12 patients (10–13 years, median 12.1 years) underwent epiphyseal primary ACL reconstruction, with a total of 13 knee procedures. Patients were assessed retrospectively with a median follow-up of 54 months (range 39–80 months) consisting of a clinical examination, instrumented arthrometer testing and radiological analysis. Functional status was assessed using the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale and IKDC-2000 form.

Results

According to the IKDC examination form, five knees were rated as normal, six near normal and two abnormal. The median IKDC score at follow-up was 88.5 points (range 75–99 points). The mean side–to-side difference in KT-1000 ligament laxity testing was 1.5 mm (±2.5 mm). In two patients, reoperation was necessary due to graft failure. Two patients developed significant leg length inequality; one with 20 mm overgrowth and varus malalignment after re-reconstruction and the second developed arthrofibrosis and overgrowth of 16 mm. Four patients had minor limb length discrepancy ranging between +5 and +10 mm; no growth arrest was noted. One patient with an intact but slightly elongated graft required a meniscal suture 34 months after ACL reconstruction following a traumatic medial meniscal lesion.

Conclusion

Despite using the epiphyseal technique in ACL reconstruction, relevant growth discrepancy can occur. Thereby, overgrowth rates appear to potentially pose a major clinical problem, which has remained unreported so far. Overall, there is a considerable high risk of complications in this patient group.

Level of evidence

IV.

     

Gender differences following computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Female patients not only demonstrate an increased risk for injury, but also a poorer response following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. However, no study has investigated gender-related differences between computer-navigated single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of gender on the outcome of computer-navigated SB and DB ACL reconstruction and to present reference values.

Methods

A retrospective review of 55 consecutive patients who underwent SB (15 males, 12 females) and DB (18 males, 10 females) ACL reconstruction with autogenous hamstring tendon grafts and showed a minimum follow-up of 24 months was conducted. Intraoperatively, the anteroposterior and rotational laxity were measured and the follow-up examination included pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Lysholm score and Tegner score.

Results

Pre-operatively, female patients showed a significant higher internal rotation in (p < 0.001) both the SB and DB group. Regarding the post-operative reduction in internal rotation, females in the SB group revealed a greater reduction compared to males (p < 0.001), whereas females in the DB group revealed a significantly greater post-operative reduction in anterior–posterior translation (p = 0.04). Female patients following DB ACL reconstruction presented a significant worse IKDC score, Lysholm score and Tegner score compared to male patients. All score values of the female DB group were worse than in the female SB group. In contrast, male patients showed better results of all examined clinical scores following DB procedure compared to SB technique.

Conclusion

Female patients who underwent computer-navigated DB ACL reconstruction exhibited significantly worse outcome scores than males who underwent DB ACL reconstruction. The gender-based relationship between joint function and outcome after ACL reconstruction remains unclear and requires further investigation.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case–control series, Level III.     

Recurrent posterior knee laxity: diagnosis,technical aspects and treatment algorithm

Purpose

Aim of this study was to determine the characteristics, clinical and radiological diagnostic methods of PCL isolated and combined knee injuries.

Methods

One hundred and twelve patients with a recurrent posterior knee laxity were surgically treated. Clinical examination, MRI, Telos? stress dynamic X-rays, KT-1000 measurements and the IKDC questionnaire were used to diagnose and evaluate these injuries.

Results

Median follow-up was 4.5 years (2–11 years). Thirty-two patients (28.6 %) had an isolated posterior laxity, 53 (47.3 %) a posterior posterolateral laxity, 21 (18.7 %) a posterior posteromedial laxity and six (5.4 %) patients had a complex posterior and mediolateral laxity. Road traffic accidents and sports injuries were the main causes of trauma. The mean preoperative value of posterior tibial translation was 13.5 mm (SD 1.4) and the mean postoperative value was 4.4 mm (SD 1.7) as measured with the Telos device. In the cases with a concomitant ACL rupture, the mean preoperative value of anterior tibial translation was 6.5 mm (SD 1.3) and the mean postoperative value was 1.7 mm (SD 0.8). The mean pre- and postoperative IKDC scores were 74.5 (SD 4.2) and 87.9 (SD 3.1), respectively. Meniscal and/or cartilage injuries were found in 80 patients (71.4 %).

Conclusions

Recurrent posterior knee laxity can be restored with the one-stage PCL reconstruction using a quadriceps graft and reconstruction of the posteromedial-posterolateral lesions using the LaPrade techniques. The benefits of this study include enabling surgeons to accurately manage these injuries from a clinical perspective, and treating them with a specific surgical algorithm.

Level of evidence

III.

     

The effect of tunnel placement on rotational stability after ACL reconstruction: evaluation with use of triaxial accelerometry in a porcine model

Purpose

Conventional transtibial technique fails to restore the rotational knee stability in spite of successful anterior laxity, while anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique has been developed expecting better rotational kinematics because of closer reproduction of the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. However, the rotational instability after those two procedures has not been fully examined especially in terms of dynamic component of the rotational stability. The purpose was to assess the effect of anatomic versus non-anatomic tunnel placement on rotational knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using triaxial accelerometry.

Methods

Sixteen porcine knees underwent a manual pivot-shift test at four different conditions: (1) anterior cruciate ligament intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament deficient, (3) non-anatomic transtibial reconstruction, and (4) anatomic anteromedial portal reconstruction. The three-dimensional acceleration of knee motion during the pivot-shift test was recorded using a triaxial accelerometer.

Results

Both anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions decreased significantly the acceleration of the pivot-shift test from the increased level in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient condition. However, the transtibial technique fails to reach the intact level of acceleration, while the anteromedial portal technique reduced the acceleration to even less than the intact level.

Conclusion

The transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could not restore the dynamic rotational stability of the intact knee, whereas the anteromedial portal technique restored the dynamic rotational stability closer to the intact level.

Level of evidence

III.     

Primary ligament sutures as a treatment option of knee dislocations: a meta-analysis

Purpose

Treatment of knee dislocation is still controversial. There is no evidence to favour ligament suture or reconstruction. Until now, no meta-analyses have examined suture versus reconstruction of cruciate ligaments in knee dislocations with respect to injury pattern and rupture classification.

Methods

We searched Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Database, and EMBASE for studies on surgical treatment for ‘knee dislocation’ and ‘multiple ligament injured knee’. A meta-analysis was performed using individual patient data.

Results

Nine studies including 195 patients (200 knees) with a mean age of 31.4 (±13) years fulfilled the study requirements. Thirteen cases of type II dislocations, 63 cases of type III medial, 84 cases of type III lateral, and 40 cases of type IV dislocations, according to Schenck’s classification, were found. Poor or moderate results were found in 70 % of patients without surgical treatment of ACL or PCL (n = 27). Patients (n = 40) treated by sutures of the ACL and PCL demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of excellent or good results (40 and 37.5 %, respectively) (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent reconstruction of the ACL and PCL (n = 75) showed excellent or good results (28 and 45 %, respectively). No significant difference was found when comparing suture versus reconstruction of the ACL and PCL (n.s.). The outcome depends considerably on Schenck’s injury pattern classification.

Conclusion

Conservative treatment after knee dislocation yields poor clinical results. Suture repair of cruciate ligaments can still serve as an alternative option for multiligament injuries of the knee and achieve good clinical results, which are comparable to those of ligament reconstruction. The data provided by this meta-analysis should be reinforced by a prospective study, in which suture repair and ligament reconstruction are compared.

Level of evidence

IV.     

Nonoperative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in recreational alpine skiers

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to test whether low-grade Lachman test (i.e. Grade 0–1+) and a negative pivot shift at 6–12 weeks post-ACL rupture in recreational alpine skiers can be used to predict good function and normal knee laxity in nonoperated patients at minimum 2 years after the injury.

Methods

Office registry was used to identify 63 recreational alpine skiers treated by the senior author within 6 weeks of a first-time ACL injury between 2003 and 2008. Of these, 34 had early ACL reconstruction but 29 patients were observed and re-evaluated. Office charts and MRI were reviewed. Inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: ACL rupture documented on MRI after the injury, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criterion was contralateral knee ligament injury. Of the 29 patients treated nonoperatively, 17 had low-grade Lachman and negative pivot shift tests within 6–12 weeks after the injury and were recommended to continue follow-up without surgery. Of these 17 patients, 6 were lost to follow up, but 11 patients were recalled and evaluated at more than 2 years after the injury. They completed Marx and Tegner activity level and IKDC subjective scores, physical examination of the knee and KT-1000 anterior laxity assessment.

Results

Median age at injury was 43 years (range 29–58). Median follow-up was 42 months (range 30–68). Mean IKDC subjective score at latest follow-up was 91.6 ± 6.7. Median Tegner score was 6 (range 6–9) before the injury and 6 (range 4–6) at latest follow-up (p = n.s). Median Marx score was 6 (range 0–16) before the injury and 4 (range 0–12) at latest follow-up (p = 0.03). Ten patients had Lachman Grade 0–1+, and one had Lachman Grade 2+ at latest follow-up. KT-1000 showed mean side-to-side difference of 0.8 ± 1.6 mm, and less than 3 mm difference in the 10 patients with Lachman Grade 0–1+.

Conclusion

Recreational alpine skiers who sustain ACL injury should be re-evaluated at 6–12 weeks after the injury rather than being operated acutely. If they have negative Lachman and pivot shift tests at that point, they can be treated without surgery since good outcome and normal knee anterior laxity at more than 2 years after the injury is expected.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.     

Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

Purpose

Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) yields less satisfying results than anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with respect to laxity control. Accurate tibial tunnel placement is crucial for successful PCL reconstruction using arthroscopic tibial tunnel techniques. A discrepancy between anatomical studies of the tibial PCL insertion site and surgical recommendations for tibial tunnel placement remains. The objective of this study was to identify the optimal placement of the tibial tunnel in PCL reconstruction based on clinical studies.

Methods

In a systematic review of the literature, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Review, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were screened for articles about PCL reconstruction from January 1990 to September 2011. Clinical trials comparing at least two PCL reconstruction techniques were extracted and independently analysed by each author. Only studies comparing different tibial tunnel placements in the retrospinal area were included.

Results

This systematic review found no comparative clinical trial for tibial tunnel placement in PCL reconstruction. Several anatomical, radiological, and biomechanical studies have described the tibial insertion sites of the native PCL and have led to recommendations for placement of the tibial tunnel outlet in the retrospinal area. However, surgical recommendations and the results of morphological studies are often contradictory.

Conclusions

Reliable anatomical landmarks for tunnel placement are lacking. Future randomized controlled trials could compare precisely defined tibial tunnel placements in PCL reconstruction, which would require an established mapping of the retrospinal area of the tibial plateau with defined anatomical and radiological landmarks.

Level of evidence

III.     

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring autograft and accelerated rehabilitation: a 10-year prospective study on clinical results, knee osteoarthritis and its predictors

Purpose

Analysis of long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with special attention to knee osteoarthritis and its predictors.

Methods

A prospective, consecutive case series of 100 patients. Arthroscopic transtibial ACL reconstruction was performed using 4-strand hamstring tendon autografts with a standardized accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Analysis was performed preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively. Clinical examination included Lysholm and Tegner scores, IKDC, KT-1000 testing (MEDmetric Co., San Diego, CA, USA) and leg circumference measurements. Radiological evaluation included AP weight bearing, lateral knee, Rosenberg and sky view X-rays. Radiological classifications were according to Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.

Results

Clinical outcome A significant improvement (p < 0.001) between preoperative and postoperative measurements could be demonstrated for the Lysholm and Tegner scores, IKDC patient subjective assessment, KT-1000 measurements, pivot shift test, IKDC score and one-leg hop test. A pivot shift phenomenon (glide) was still present in 43 (50 %) patients and correlated with lower levels of activity (p < 0.022). Radiological outcome: At follow-up, 46 (53.5 %) patients had signs of osteoarthritis (OA). In this group, 33 patients (72 %) had chondral lesions (≥grade 2) at the time of ACL reconstruction. A history of medial meniscectomy before or at the time of ACL reconstruction increased the risk of knee OA 4 times (95 % CI 1.41–11.5). An ICRS grade 3 at the time of ACL reconstruction increased the risk of knee OA by 5.2 times (95 % CI 1.09–24.8). There was no correlation between OA and activity level (Tegner score ≥6) nor between OA and a positive pivot shift test.

Conclusion

Transtibial ACL reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring autograft and accelerated rehabilitation restored anteroposterior knee stability. Clinical parameters and patient satisfaction improved significantly. At 10-year follow-up, radiological signs of OA were present in 53.5 % of the subjects. Risk factors for OA were meniscectomy prior to or at the time of ACL reconstruction and chondral lesions at the time of ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

II.