Iatrogenic splenic injury

In a previous report from this institution, 21% of splenectomies performed between 1957 and 1967 were for iatrogenic injury to the spleen. In the present study, encompassing the years 1971 to 1987, the frequency of iatrogenic splenic injury was reduced to 9% (134 of 1,557 splenectomies). However, there has been no evidence of a progressive decrease in accidental splenic injury from 1971 to 1987. Although the number of injuries related to operations on the stomach or repair of hiatus hernia have declined somewhat in the past decade, the incidence of splenic injuries secondary to colectomy and nephrectomy has not changed appreciably, and injuries linked to complex operations on the aorta and its branches (19 cases) have increased. No evidence could be found that morbidity was increased if the splenic injury is promptly recognized and managed by splenectomy. However, 13 of these 134 patients required reoperation for control of continued bleeding from unrecognized iatrogenic splenic trauma. Constant awareness of the continued prevalence of this operative complication and the mechanisms by which it is produced should enable surgeons to lessen its frequency and potential sequelae.     

Iatrogenic splenic injuries

Inadvertent intraoperative injuries to the spleen by the surgical team represent an underestimated complication of many abdominal procedures. Surgical reports often lack the necessary details and frequently a clear justification as why a splenectomy was indicated is not provided. The wide variability of the incidence reported in literature makes it is difficult to evaluate the morbidity and mortality associated to these injuries and to assess the early and late consequences of this complication, although it is still possible to infer some of the reasons for these inconsistencies and to roughly estimate both clinical and socio-economical effects of this injury. Given the degree of uncertainty on the incidence of iatrogenic and traumatic splenic injuries and on the immediate and long-term sequelae suffered by asplenic patients, we thought that a multicentric prospective study was warranted. We are therefore announcing the start of a study involving several Institutions within the Regione Campania, aimed at obtaining an unbiased estimate of the incidence of these injuries, together with the extent and severity of their long-term complications. We also aim to help promoting a more effective prevention.     

Iatrogenic splenic injury during anterior thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Case report

The proximity of major abdominal structures encountered in the approach for an anterior thoracolumbar spinal operation makes patients vulnerable to potential intraoperative complications. The spleen, in particular, can be easily injured during manipulation or from being under retractors for a number of hours, although it is a rarely reported phenomenon in the literature. The authors report on a 52-year-old man who suffered a spleen laceration following anterior L1-2 corpectomy and fusion for osteomyelitis of the lumbar spine. The patient required an emergency splenectomy, but he made a full recovery.     

Iatrogenic ureteral injury

We treated 27 patients with iatrogenic ureteral injuries during a 6-year period. Gynecological operations were the most common antecedent surgical procedures (52 per cent). The diagnosis of ureteral injury was made immediately in 4 patients and was delayed 1 to 34 days in 23. Three of the 4 injuries recognized during an operation were repaired successfully at the time of injury; the primary repair in the remaining patient leaked and ultimately resulted in a nephrectomy. In the delayed diagnosis group retrograde ureteral catheterization was successful in only 1 of 20 attempts. Of the 23 patients with injuries recognized in the postoperative period 11 were managed successfully with percutaneous nephrostomy (with or without stenting) alone, 3 required surgical repair after temporary percutaneous nephrostomy drainage, 4 were treated surgically without prior nephrostomy drainage and 1 had spontaneous resolution of hydronephrosis. The remaining 3 patients required nephrectomy: 1 because of a urinary fistula in a previously irradiated field, 1 because of a concomitant (ipsilateral) renal cell carcinoma and 1 because of renal hypertension. Percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral stenting was successful as primary therapy in 73 per cent of the patients in whom it was used.     

Iatrogenic renal vascular injury

Bilateral arteriovenous fistulas secondary to percutaneous needle biopsy of each kidney dcrcloped in a patient with malignant hypertension and chronic renal failure. The fistulas with aneurysmal formation and hematuria were of such magnitude that bilateral nephrectomy was required fin control. The patient is now normotensive and is maintained on hemodialysis The advisability of renal needle biopsy in uncontrolled hypertension is questioned. Cases o] intrarenal arteriovenous fistulas resulting from percutaneous needle biopsy of the kidney are being reported with increasing frequency. The exact incidence of fistula formation after kidney biopsy, is unknoun but several series based on arteriographic studies show an incidence as high as IN per cent. A1though many of these fistulas disappear spontaneonsly, approximately 4 per cent persist. A review of the literature failed to reveal the incidence of aneurysmal formation. Our case was complicated by formation of bilateral renal arteriovenous fistulas secondary to repeat bilateral percutaneous needle biopsy and right open renal biopsy. Subsequent gross hematuria from the ureteral orifice also resulted which was proved by cystoscopy and required replacement with sev eral units of blood. The likelihood of rupture led to bilateral nephrectomy.     

Iatrogenic accessory nerve injury.

Accessory nerve injury produces considerable disability. The nerve is most frequently damaged as a complication of radical neck dissection, cervical lymph node biopsy and other surgical procedures. The problem is frequently compounded by a failure to recognise the error immediately after surgery when surgical repair has the greatest chance of success. We present cases which outline the risk of accessory nerve injury, the spectrum of clinical presentations and the problems produced by a failure to recognise the deficit. Regional anatomy, consequences of nerve damage and management options are discussed. Diagnostic biopsy of neck nodes should not be undertaken as a primary investigation and, when indicated, surgery in this region should be performed by suitably trained staff under well-defined conditions. Awareness of iatrogenic injury and its consequences would avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.     

Iatrogenic carotid artery injury in neurosurgery

Iatrogenic carotid artery injury (CAI) results from various neurosurgical procedures. A review of the literature was conducted to provide an update on the management of this potentially devastating complication. Iatrogenic CAIs are categorized according to each diagnostic or therapeutic procedure responsible for the injury, i.e., anterior cervical spine surgery, central venous catheterization, chemical substances, chiropractic manipulation, diagnostic cerebral angiography, middle-ear surgery, percutaneous procedures for trigeminal neuralgia, radiation therapy, skull-base surgery, tracheostomy, and transsphenoidal surgery. The incidence, mechanisms of injury, diagnostic imaging modalities, and reparative procedures are discussed for each procedure. Iatrogenic CAI may be more prevalent than had previously been thought, mostly because of a heightened awareness on the part of physicians and the earlier detection of asymptomatic patients owing to sophisticated and less-invasive imaging modalities. Prevention is the best treatment for every iatrogenic injury, and it is expected that further accumulation of experience with and knowledge of iatrogenic CAI will result in further reduction of this complication. Although some CAIs, such as radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis, may not be preventable, earlier intervention before the patient becomes symptomatic may favorably alter the prognosis. Following the rapid development of endovascular techniques in recent years, surgically inaccessible lesions can be treated in a more reliable and safe manner than before.A commentary on this paper is available at     

Iatrogenic vascular injury during peripheral revascularization

Iatrogenic vascular injury may occur during peripheral revascularization procedures secondary to the application of vascular occlusive devices. This review summarizes the known mechanical causes of such injury, relates this to clamp design, and suggests methods to minimize such injury by appropriate selection and handling of vascular occlusive clamps.     

Iatrogenic fluoroscopy injury to the skin

Iatrogenic radiation injuries are an accepted complication of therapeutic radiation therapy, however, they can also occur during fluoroscopic procedures. These are challenging wounds and are often misdiagnosed, leading to frustration for the patient and treating physicians. We reviewed 3 cases of severe fluoroscopic burns with ulceration, non healing wounds, and preoperative debilitating pain. The average number of fluoroscopy procedures was 2.7, with an average total fluoroscopy procedure time of 10 hours. The skin changes presented at 2.3 weeks with the time to surgical intervention being on average 19 months. All patients had immediate resolution of their preoperative pain and a stable healed wound at follow-up. Fluoroscopic radiation burns can be adequately treated with wide excision of all affected tissue and vascularized flap coverage.     

胃肠道肿瘤手术中医源性脾损伤的原因及预防(附26例报告)

胃肠道肿瘤手术尤其是经腹近侧胃切除、全胃切除术和横结肠切除术中易发生脾损伤。2000年1月至2005年12月我院行胃肠道肿瘤切除术2200例，术中发生脾损伤26例，损伤率为1．18％。现分析报道如下。     

Limitations of splenic angioembolization in treating blunt splenic injury

BACKGROUND: When angiography is performed in all hemodynamically normal patients with splenic injury, only 30% require embolization. This study examines the use of selective splenic angioembolization (SAE) as part of a management algorithm for adult splenic injury. METHODS: Criteria for selective SAE were added to our adult splenic injury protocol in July 1999. SAE was performed in hemodynamically stable patients if computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed injury to the hilum or vascular blush and when nonoperative patients had a gradual decrease in hematocrit. Patients were grouped by management strategy: nonoperative; operative; or SAE. Demographics, injury severity, and outcomes of the different groups were compared. Medical records, CT scans, and registry data were reviewed for all SAE cases, deaths, and treatment failures. Data are means +/- SE. p < 0.05 versus nonoperative management by analysis of variance. RESULTS: From July 1999 to August 2003, 194 adults were treated for splenic injury. Nine patients underwent SAE, six for CT findings (1 vascular blush) and three for decreasing hematocrit. Three patients failed SAE (33%), one for bleeding and two for delayed splenic infarction. Eleven patients failed nonoperative therapy (8%); splenorrhaphy was performed in three and splenectomy in eight. Operative patients were more seriously injured and had higher Injury Severity Scores and mortality; splenectomy (39 of 48) was more commonly performed than splenorrhaphy (9 of 48) in this group. CONCLUSION: Use of a splenic injury algorithm is associated with a high success rate for nonoperative management of splenic trauma. Using selective criteria, only 5% of patients were treated with SAE. SAE salvaged six patients with high-grade splenic injury or decreasing hematocrit but had a 33% failure rate. Failure of nonoperative management was most commonly caused by errors in judgment, primarily recognition of "high-risk" injury patterns on CT scan or attempting nonoperative management in anticoagulated or coagulopathic patients.