Segmental epidural analgesia in labour: related to the progress of labour, fetal malposition and instrumental delivery.

The effect of low-dose continuous segmental epidural analgesia given during the first stage of labour on the progress of labour, the frequency of fetal malpositions and the rate of vacuum extractions was studied prospectively in 100 parturients (epidural group). The results were compared with 100 parturients given none or conventional analgesia (control group). The results showed that in the primiparous epidural group the progress of labour before analgesia was induced was significantly slower than in the control group. After the block, however, the subsequent course of the labour was of equal duration in both groups. The durations of the second stages of labour did not differ significantly between the groups. The differences in fetal malpositions at delivery were statistically insignificant. Nor did the rate of vacuum extractions, 8% in the primiparous and 0% in the multiparous epidural group, differ statistically from the corresponding rate in the control groups. The results signify a normal progress and outcome of labour after low-dose segmental epidural analgesia.     

The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25,069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region, 1988.

OBJECTIVE: To define the contemporary characteristics of the second stage of labour in one Health Region. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a regional obstetric database. SETTING: Seventeen maternity units in the North West Thames Health Region. SUBJECTS: Selected from 36,727 consecutive singleton deliveries in 1988. The analysis was confined to the 25,069 women delivered of an infant of at least 37 weeks gestation with a cephalic presentation following the spontaneous onset of labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Second stage duration, obstetric intervention and maternal and fetal morbidity. RESULTS: The duration of the second stage and the use of operative intervention were strongly negatively associated with parity and positively associated with the use of epidural analgesia. Maternal age, fetal birthweight and maternal height were also independently associated with the duration of the second stage. There were small but significant differences in the characteristics of women using epidural analgesia and those using alternative methods of pain relief. Parous women using epidural analgesia behaved in a similar manner to nulliparae without epidurals. Despite the longer second stages observed in women using epidural analgesia there appeared to be no significant increase in fetal morbidity. Within the region the epidural rate in individual units positively correlated with the overall forceps rate, the rate of caesarean section in the second stage of labour and the duration of the second stage. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the duration of the second stage in women not using epidural analgesia was similar to previous findings, but in those using epidural analgesia, the duration of the second stage was longer than has been reported previously, possibly reflecting a more conservative approach to operative intervention. Survival analysis indicates that in multiparae not using epidural analgesia the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery after 1 h in the second stage was low, but in those multiparae using epidural analgesia and in all nulliparae there was no clear cut-off point for expectation of spontaneous delivery in the near future; they continue to give birth at a steady rate over several hours. While maternal and fetal conditions are satisfactory, intervention should be based on the rate of progress rather than the elapsed time since full cervical dilatation.     

Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural analgesia in labour

Summary. Seventy-six primigravidae with epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups for management in the second stage. In one group the women delayed pushing and in the other they were managed conventionally. The two groups were well matched for maternal and infant characteristics, including position and level of the presenting part at full dilatation and fetal scalp blood pH. The mean waiting time in the second stage before pushing was increased from 27 min in the conven- tional group to 123 min in the delayed group. This delay was not associated with an increase in abnormal fetal heart rate abnormalities or any decrease in umbilical cord pH or Apgar scores. In contrast, the delay was associated with an increase in spontaneous deliveries and a decrease in forceps deliveries ( P =0.06). These findings suggest a need for redefining the management of the second stage of labour with epidural analgesia.     

A randomised double-blind comparison of epidural fentanyl versus fentanyl and bupivicaine for pain relief in the second stage of labour

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of two different methods for epidural analgesia in the second stage of labour-fentanyl alone versus the usual mixture of bupivicaine and fentanyl. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. SETTING: An English maternity hospital. SAMPLE: Eighty nulliparous women in the second stage of labour. METHODS: After successful institution of epidural analgesia with a continuous infusion of bupivicaine/fentanyl mixture in the first stage of labour, the patients were randomised at full dilatation to receive either continuation of the same solution or a change to a fentanyl-only solution given at the same rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of delivery, duration of the second stage and quality of analgesia. RESULTS: There was no difference in the number of instrumental deliveries (30%vs 27.5%) or the duration of the second stage (141 vs 147 minutes) between the bupivicaine/fentanyl and fentanyl groups, respectively. The bupivicaine/fentanyl group demonstrated a lower need for rescue epidural analgesia (1 vs 6, RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-1.3) and significantly fewer high pain scores (11 vs 20, RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.0). CONCLUSION: Second stage epidural analgesia with fentanyl did not alter delivery outcomes or labour duration but resulted in poorer analgesia.     

Labour Outcome of Low-risk Multiparas of 40 Years and Older. A Case-control Study

Summary: Between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1997 a total of 76 low-risk multiparas of 40 years and older with spontaneous onset of labour were delivered and were compared with 152 younger (25–30 years-old) low-risk multiparas of similar parity in a case-control study. The labour and perinatal outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. The duration of the 0first stage of labour was longer (233 minutes versus 149 minutes, p < 0.0005) in the older women. Significantly more labours of older multiparas were complicated by intrapartum fetal distress (6.6% versus 1.3%, p < 0.05); received intramuscular analgesia (11.8% versus 2.6%, p < 0.01); and had operative deliveries (17.1% versus 4.6%, p < 0.01). The incidence of instrumental delivery (11.8% versus 3.9%, p < 0.05) and Caesarean section (5.3% versus 0.7%, p < 0.05) were higher among older multiparas. The incidences of Syntocinon augmentation of labour, prolonged second stage, episiotomy and third stage complications such as perineal tear, primary postpartum haemorrhage, and retained placenta were similar in both groups. Both groups had similar perinatal outcomes. These women should be treated as others with high-risk pregnancies with appropriate careful attention during labour such as continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. They should be counselled to be made aware of the increased risks during labour.     

The impact of intrapartum analgesia on labour and delivery outcomes in nulliparous women

OBJECTIVE: To determine if nulliparous women intending to have epidural analgesia have a similar labour profile and delivery outcome to women who intend to have their labour managed using alternative forms of pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial conducted at a tertiary obstetric institution. Nulliparous women intending to deliver vaginally with a term singleton fetus were eligible for recruitment. RESULTS: 1159 women were recruited, of whom 992 were subsequently randomised to receive continuous midwifery support (CMS) or epidural analgesia (EPI) on presentation for delivery. The duration of labour was shorter in the CMS group compared with EPI (10.7 hours (inter quartile (IQ) 7.0,15.2) versus 11.4 hours (IQ 8.2,15.2), p = 0.039). The median duration of the first stage was 8.9 hours (IQ 6,12.5) versus 9.5 hours (IQ 7,12.7) (p = 0.069), and the median duration of the second stage was 1.33 hours (IQ 0.6,2.5) versus 1.48 hours (IQ 0.77,2.6) (p = 0.034). The requirement for oxytocin augmentation in spontaneous labour was 39.8% CMS versus 46.2% EPI (p = 0.129). There was no significant difference in the caesarean section rates. The need for any operative delivery was significantly lower in CMS (43.9% CMS versus 51.5% EPI, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women have a high usage of epidural analgesia, regardless of their prelabour intentions. In women who do not intend to use epidural analgesia, the temporal delay in insertion compared with those who use epidural analgesia as their primary analgesic modality is associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in overall labour duration and operative delivery rates.     

Epidural analgesia and the course of delivery in term primiparas

OBJECTIVES: Epidural analgesia provides the most effective pain control during labor. Of great concern is its influence on the course of delivery and perinatal complications. DESIGN: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of epidural analgesia on the course of delivery and perinatal outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 609 deliveries among 1334 (323 women with epidural analgesia (53%) and 548 without epidural analgesia (47%)) met the following criteria: primipara, singleton, live pregnancy, > =37 weeks' gestation, cephalic presentation of a fetus, lack of contraindication for vaginal delivery. The incidence of instrumental deliveries and fetal distress, duration of the first, second and third stage of labor, perinatal outcome, perinatal complications and perinatal blood loss and were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of fetal distress during second stage of labor was significantly higher in the epidural group (12.69 vs. 6.99%, P=0.02). The incidence of fetal distress during first stage of labor did not differ in both groups (10.53% vs. 8.74%, NS). Cesarean sections rate was similar in epidural and non-epidural group (17.7 vs. 18.2%, NS). Among vaginal deliveries duration of the first and second stage of labor was longer in epidural group (6.5+/-2.4 vs. 5.4+/-2.5 godz., P=0,000003 and 47.3+/-34.8 vs. 29.1+/-25.8 min., P=0.000003) and this was independent of period of time between onset of first stage of labor and epidural analgesia. Oxitocin use was significantly more frequent in the epidural group (20.6 vs. 10.3%, P<0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of instrumental vaginal deliveries, 1 and 5-minute Apgar scores, length of third stage of labor and perinatal blood loss in patients with and without epidural analgesia. Perinatal outcome did not depend on previous use of epidural analgesia or mode of analgesia for the operation in cesarean section subgroup. CONCLUSION: Epidural labor analgesia is associated with slower progress of labor but has no adverse effect on perinatal outcome and perinatal complications.     

The effect of epidural analgesia on the occurrence of obstetric lacerations and on the neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery

The aim of this study was to determine if epidural analgesia is associated with increased risk of obstetric lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Furthermore we assessed the effect of epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal parameters. This multicenter study consisted of an analysis of data from the delivery databases of the University Hospital of Vienna and the Semmelweis Women's Hospital Vienna. This study was restricted to a sample that included all women with uncomplicated pregnancy, a gestational age >37(th) weeks and a pregnancy with cephalic presentation. Epidural analgesia was set during the first stage of labour. Techniques and management styles of epidural analgesia were the same in both hospitals. No statistically significant association was found between epidural analgesia and the occurrence of perineal tears (p=0.83), vaginal (p=0.37) or labial trauma (p=0.11). Furthermore the results demonstrated a statistically significant higher rate of primiparous women using epidural analgesia (p=0.001). A statistically significant prolonged second stage of labour was observed in women undergoing epidural analgesia (p=0.0001). Episiotomy was statistically significant more frequent in women requiring epidural analgesia (p=0.0001). Women who were treated with epidural analgesia were more likely to have labour augmented with oxytocin (p=0.001). No statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes determined by APGAR score (p=0.84) and cord pH (p=0.23) were observed between the two groups. Women undergoing epidural analgesia demonstrated a prolonged second stage of labour, a higher rate of episiotomy and an increased use of oxytocin to augment labour. Some of these adverse effects might be caused by the higher rate of primiparous women using epidural analgesia. However, epidural analgesia showed no evidence of a detrimental effect on the integrity of the birth-canal in spontaneous vaginal delivery. In our opinion it is a save and effective method of pain relief during labour.     

A prospective randomised trial on the effect of position in the passive second stage of labour on birth outcome in nulliparous women using epidural analgesia

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the rate of instrumental birth in nulliparous women using epidural analgesia is affected by maternal position in the passive second stage of labour. DESIGN: A pragmatic prospective randomised trial. SETTING: Consultant maternity unit in the Midlands. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seven nulliparous women using epidural analgesia and reaching the second stage of labour with no contraindications to spontaneous birth. INTERVENTIONS: The lateral versus the supported sitting position during the passive second stage of labour. MEASUREMENTS: Mode of birth, incidence of episiotomy, and perineal suturing. FINDINGS: Recruitment was lower than anticipated (107 vs. 220 planned). Lateral position was associated with lower rates of instrumental birth rate (lateral group 33%; sitting group 52%; p=0.05, RR 0.64, CI for RR: 0.40-1.01; Number-needed-to-treat (NNT)=5), of episiotomy (45% vs. 64%; p=0.05, RR 0.66, CI for RR: 0.44-1.00, NNT=5), and of perineal suturing (78% vs. 86%; p=0.243, RR 0.75, CI for RR 0.47-1.17). The odds ratio for instrumental birth in the sitting group was 2.2 (CI 1.00-4.6). Logistic regression of potential confounder variables was undertaken, due to a large variation in maternal weight between the randomised groups. Of the nine possible confounders tested, only position of the baby's head at full dilation affected the risk of instrumental birth significantly (p=0.4, OR 2.7 where the fetal head was in the lateral or posterior position). Maternal weight did not appear to have any effect. The odds ratio for instrumental delivery for women randomised to the sitting position was slightly higher within the logistic regression model (adjusted OR 2.3). KEY CONCLUSIONS: Women randomised to the lateral position had a better chance of a spontaneous vaginal birth than those randomised to the supported sitting position. Position of the babies head at full dilation had an additional effect on mode of birth. These effects are not conclusively generalizable. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The lateral position is likely to be at best beneficial, and at the worst no less harmful than the sitting position for most women and their babies who meet the criteria set for this study. Conclusive evidence for or against the technique should be established using larger trials.     

Fetal heart rate and neonatal condition related to epidural analgesia in women reaching the second stage of labour

The relationship between epidural analgesia and a number of labour and delivery factors, relevant to fetal and neonatal condition, was considered in a prospective study of 200 labours reaching the second stage of labour. The group was representative of the hospital population with regard to the proportion of nulliparous women, the incidence of instrumental vaginal deliveries and the incidence of epidural analgesia (37%). The 8% of labours requiring fetal blood sampling during the first stage, and the labours with fetal heart rate (FHR) decelerations in the hour prior to second stage (25%) and during pushing (50%) were significantly more likely to have been given an epidural. Nulliparity (55%), induced labour (34%), a first stage longer than eight hours (37%), a second stage longer than 60 min (43%), maternal pushing for longer than 36 min (50%), forceps delivery (28%) and a 1 min Apgar score less than 7 (12%) were also factors associated with significantly higher rates of epidural analgesia whereas meconium (15%), a small baby (16%) and umbilical arterial metabolic acidaemia (13%) were not. FHR decelerations in labours reaching the second stage with an epidural reflect adjustments to fetal cardiovascular control and not acidaemia.     

Benefits of continuous infusion epidural analgesia throughout vaginal delivery

Two groups of nulliparous women with fetuses in singleton vertex presentation received continuous infusion epidural analgesia (EDA) with bupivacaine: group A (90 parturients) without infusion analgesia in the second stage of labor and group B (90 parturients) with infusion analgesia throughout delivery. The groups were compared regarding pain relief, duration of the second stage, persistent malrotation of the fetal head, and rate of instrumental vaginal delivery. The continuous infusion EDA gave satisfactory pain relief in 93.3% of the parturients in group A and 97.8% in group B. The duration of second stage was the same in both groups. There were more persistent malrotations of the fetal head in group A, but the malrotation did not affect the mode of delivery. The rate of instrumental vaginal delivery was 25.5% in both groups. The main cause of operative intervention was delay in the second stage. When the continuous infusion technique is used, it seems unreasonable to discontinue the EDA and thereby deprive the parturient of analgesia during the second stage.     

Randomized trial of amniotomy in labour versus the intention to leave membranes intact until the second stage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare by randomized prospective clinical trial the outcome of labours which are managed with the intention to leave the membranes intact, compared with the practice of elective artificial rupture of the membranes (ARM) in early established labour. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial of low risk women admitted in spontaneous labour, with intact membranes. SETTING: The labour ward of St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. SUBJECTS: 362 women in spontaneous labour with intact membranes and no evidence of fetal distress, between 37 and 42 weeks gestation. During the course of the trial it was found that some randomization cards could not be accounted for and a system of daily checks was instituted. The results were analysed for all recorded women (n = 362) and after institution of the more rigorous system (n = 120). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: The duration of each phase of labour, epidural rate, prevalence of an abnormal cardiotocograph (CTG) (assessed blind), method of delivery and neonatal outcome. RESULTS: 178 of the 183 women (97%) in the ARM group had their membranes ruptured in early labour, and 83 (46%) of the 179 women allocated to non-intervention had ARM performed at some stage. A significant decrease in the duration of labour (mean 8.3, SD 4.1 h vs mean 9.7, SD 4.8 h, n = 156; P = 0.05) was found amongst primigravidae allocated to ARM when compared with non intervention. The duration of the second stage of labour was unaffected. In the ARM group the epidural rate was higher and labour was more often complicated by CTG abnormalities. There were no differences in the method of delivery, fetal condition at birth (cord blood lactate, Apgar score) or postpartum pyrexia between the ARM and non-intervention groups. The same trends were observed when analysis was confined to women entered into the trial after the system of rigour was instituted. CONCLUSION: Routine ARM results in labour that is slightly shorter than if the membranes are allowed to rupture spontaneously but more epidurals are used suggesting that labour is more painful. There are fewer fetal heart rate abnormalities if the membranes are left intact but amniotomy has no effect on fetal condition at birth.     

Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour; a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveries

A prospective randomized study was performed to evaluate the influence of epidural analgesia compared to parenteral pethidine in parturients with pain in the first stage of labour on the progress of labour and the frequency of instrumental deliveries. There was no significant difference in the two groups in the duration of either the first or second stage of labour. The overall instrumental delivery rate was 25%, with no difference between the groups. The analgesic efficacy of the epidural blockade was significantly better than that of parenteral pethidine. We conclude that epidural bupivacaine with our technique and obstetric practice did neither prolong labour nor increase the frequency of instrumental delivery.     

Do biphasic uterine contractions imply poor uterine function?

In a retrospective study of 362 cardiotocographic recordings of primigravidae in labour we found 8% biphasic or coupled uterine contractions. In augmented labour, biphasic contractions occurred almost twice as often as in spontaneous and induced labour. The duration of labour complicated with biphasic contractions was increased significantly in all types of labour. Therefore biphasic contractions may reflect uneffective uterine function. Contrary to other studies, the appearance of biphasic contractions showed no correlation with epidural analgesia and the incidence of instrumental deliveries or caesarean sections was not increased.     

Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment

OBJECTIVE: More than 50% of pregnant women in the United States are using epidural analgesia for labor pain. However, whether epidural analgesia prolongs labor and increases the risk of cesarean delivery remains controversial. STUDY DESIGN: We examined this question in a community-based, tertiary military medical center where the rate of continuous epidural analgesia in labor increased from 1% to 84% in a 1-year period while other conditions remained unchanged-a natural experiment. We systematically selected 507 and 581 singleton, nulliparous, term pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labor and vertex presentation from the respective times before and after the times that epidural analgesia was available on request during labor. We compared duration of labor, rate of cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, and oxytocin use between these two groups. RESULTS: Despite a rapid and dramatic increase in epidural analgesia during labor (from 1% to 84% in 1 year), rates of cesarean delivery overall and for dystocia remained the same (for overall cesarean delivery: adjusted relative risk, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.2; for dystocia: adjusted relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6). Overall instrumental delivery did not increase (adjusted relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4), nor did the duration of the first stage and the active phase of labor (multivariate analysis; P >.1). However, the second stage of labor was significantly longer by about 25 minutes (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia during labor does not increase the risk of cesarean delivery, nor does it necessarily increase oxytocin use or instrumental delivery caused by dystocia. The duration of the active phase of labor appears unchanged, but the second stage of labor is likely prolonged. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:128-34).     

The effect of epidural analgesia on obstetric lacerations and neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery

The aim of this study was to determine if epidural analgesia is associated with increased risk of obstetric lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery. We also assessed the effect of epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal parameters. This multicenter study consisted of an analysis of data from the delivery databases of the University Hospital of Vienna and the Semmelweis Women’s Hospital Vienna. This study was restricted to a sample that included all women with uncomplicated pregnancy, a gestational age >37 weeks and a pregnancy with cephalic presentation. Epidural analgesia was started during the first stage of labour. Techniques and management styles of epidural analgesia were the same in both hospitals. We found that women undergoing epidural analgesia had a prolonged second stage of labour, a higher rate of episiotomy and an increased use of oxytocin. Some of these adverse effects might be caused by the higher rate of primipara in the epidural group. However, epidural analgesia showed no evidence of a detrimental effect on the integrity of the birth-canal and on neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Received: 8 November 2001 / Accepted: 20 November 2001 Correspondence to K. Mayerhofer     

Uterine activity in the second stage of labour and the effect of epidural analgesia

Uterine activity was measured during the second stage of normal labour in 20 patients with and 31 patients without epidural analgesia. There was a significantly lower uterine activity integral (UAI) in patients having epidural analgesia, and it is suggested that this may contribute to the increased rate of instrumental delivery associated with epidural analgesia.     

Breech delivery and epidural analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of epidural analgesia on the progress and outcome of spontaneous labour in women with a singleton breech presentation at term (greater than or equal to 37 weeks). DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Data Bank, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital. SUBJECTS: 643 women (273 primiparae and 370 multiparae) with a singleton breech presentation and spontaneous onset of labour at term. OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of labour; augmentation of labour with oxytocin infusion; caesarean section rates. RESULTS: Epidural analgesia was associated with a significantly increased need for augmentation of labour with oxytocin infusion (P less than 0.001) and longer duration of labour (P less than 0.001), irrespective of parity. Comparing women who had epidural analgesia with those who did not, there was no significant difference in caesarean section rates in the first stage of labour in primiparae (odds ratio 1.79; 95% CI 0.88-3.63) or multiparae (odds ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.48-1.96). Epidural analgesia was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of caesarean section in the second stage of labour, both in primiparae (odds ratio 5.43; 95% CI 2.46-11.95) and multiparae (odds ratio 5.37; 95% CI 2.07-13.87). The increased likelihood of caesarean section in the second stage in primiparae with epidurals was independent of the extent of cervical dilatation (less than 3 cm or greater than or equal to 3 cm) on admission. However, in multiparae with epidurals, the difference in second stage caesarean section rate was significant only when initial cervical dilatation was less than 3 cm (odds ratio 3.65; 95% CI 1.14-11.65). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was associated with longer duration of labour, increased need for augmentation of labour with oxytocin infusion and a significantly higher caesarean section rate in the second stage of labour.     

Impact of first-stage ambulation on mode of delivery among women with epidural analgesia

BACKGROUND: New techniques for administering epidural analgesia allow increased mobility for labouring women with epidurals. Aim: To determine the effect of ambulation or upright positions in the first stage of labour among women with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and other maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of ambulation or upright positions versus recumbency in the first stage of labour among women with effective first-stage epidural analgesia in an uncomplicated pregnancy. Trials were identified by searching Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases and the Cochrane Trials Register to March 2004. Trial eligibility and outcomes were prespecified. Group tabular data were obtained for each trial and analysed using meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS: There were five eligible RCT, with a total of 1161 women. There was no statistically significant difference in the mode of delivery when women with an epidural ambulated in the first stage of labour compared with those who remained recumbent: instrumental delivery (relative risk (RR) = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.44) and Caesarean section (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70-1.19). There were no significant differences between the groups in use of oxytocin augmentation, the duration of labour, satisfaction with analgesia or Apgar scores. There were no apparent adverse effects of ambulation, but data were reported by only a few trials. CONCLUSIONS: Although ambulation in the first stage of labour for women with epidural analgesia provided no clear benefit to delivery outcomes or satisfaction with analgesia, neither were there are any obvious harms.