Trends in urologic oncology clinical practice and medical education under COVID-19 pandemic: An international survey of senior clinical and academic urologists

Objective: Ad-hoc guidelines for managing the COVID-19 pandemic are published worldwide. We investigated international applications of such policies in the urologic-oncology community. Methods: A 20-item survey was e-mailed via SurveyMonkey to 100 international senior urologic-oncology surgeons. Leaders’ policies regarding clinical/surgical management and medical education were surveyed probing demographics, affiliations, urologic-oncologic areas of interest, and current transportation restrictions. Data on COVID-19 burden were retrieved from the ECDC. Statistical analyses employed non-parametric tests (SPSS v.25.0, IBM). Results: Of 100 leaders from 17 countries, 63 responded to our survey, with 58 (92%) reporting university and/or cancer-center affiliations. Policies on new-patient visits remained mostly unchanged, while follow-up visits for low-risk diseases were mostly postponed, for example, 83.3% for small renal mass (SRM). Radical prostatectomy was delayed in 76.2% of cases, while maintaining scheduled timing for radical cystectomy (71.7%). Delays were longer in Europe than in the Americas for kidney cancer (SRM follow-up, P = 0.014), prostate cancer (new visits, P = 0.003), and intravesical therapy for intermediate-risk bladder cancer (P = 0.043). In Europe, COVID-19 burden correlated with policy adaptation, for example, nephrectomy delays for T2 disease (r = 0.5, P =0.005). Regarding education policies, trainees’ medical education was mainly unchanged, whereas senior urologists' planned attendance at professional meetings dropped from 6 (IQR 1−11) to 2 (IQR 0−5) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Under COVID-19, senior urologic-oncology surgeons worldwide apply risk-stratified approaches to timing of clinical and surgical schedules. Policies regarding trainee education were not significantly affected. We suggest establishment of an international consortium to create a directive for coping with such future challenges to global healthcare.     

The impact of laparoscopy on modern urologic practice

The original concept of laparoscopy developed as a branch of cystoscopy. Since the use of the Nitze cystoscope at its inception, laparoscopy has kept pace with the innovations in our cystoscopic inventory. The recently emerging interest of urologists in utility of the laparoscope for a variety of urologic surgery is a welcome renascence of this procedure, which has been used mainly by our gynecologic colleagues, in part because of our own lack of pursuit in its development. Laparoscopy should now become an integral part of our urologic teaching and practice.     

The impact of COVID-19 on the future of orthopaedic training in the UK

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on global healthcare systems, has drastically affected patient care, and has had widespread effects upon medical education. As plans are being devised to reinstate elective surgical services, it is important to consider the impact that the pandemic has had and will continue to have on surgical training. We describe the effect COVID-19 has had at all levels of training in the UK within trauma and orthopaedics and evaluate how training might change in the future. We found that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted trainees within trauma and orthopaedics at all levels of training. It had led to reduced operative exposure, cancellations of examinations and courses, and modifications to speciality recruitment and annual appraisals. This cohort of trainees is witnessing novel methods of delivering orthopaedic services, which will continue to develop and become part of routine practice even once the pandemic has resolved. It will be important to observe the extent to which the rapid changes currently being introduced will impact the personal health, safety, and career progression of current trainees.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on global healthcare systems, has drastically affected patient care, and has had widespread effects upon medical education. On the 23rd of March 2020, the UK government imposed a lockdown and introduced stringent social distancing measures in response to the rising number of COVID-19 infections. In the field of trauma and orthopaedics (T&O), COVID-19 led to an immediate restructuring of services, redeployment of doctors, and cancellation of elective operating.As plans are being devised to reinstate elective surgical services in the UK, it is important to consider the impact that the pandemic will have upon surgical training. This article describes the effect COVID-19 has had at all levels of training in the UK within T&O and evaluates how training might change in the future.     

The effect of COVID-19 on surgical training

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on society, healthcare in general and also on training in surgery. Cancellation of elective procedures, redeployment and establishment of green sites have combined with other factors to create significant gaps in training experience in operative and all other areas of surgery. There are nearly a million cases which have been lost to training since March 2020 and recovery means that tens of thousands of extra training cases have to be performed every month to recover that experience. There are pressures to address huge waiting list backlogs which may squeeze out time for training unless training is considered at the heart of any recovery plan. #NoTrainingTodayNoSurgeonsTomorrow. New, no blame, COVID ARCP outcomes have helped recognize the impact of the pandemic on progression and significant trainee and trainer organizations are united in raising the profile of the training crisis and offering a suite of suggestions on how to speed recovery. Disruption caused by the pandemic has allowed existing simulation and conferencing platforms to finally be widely accepted and the importance of the wider surgical team in supporting surgical training to be realized. New, outcomes-based curricula, with better feedback at their centre, will speed recovery of training trajectories. We should embrace the opportunity for change to help short and medium term recovery and improve the delivery of surgical training into the future.     

Virtual medical student education and recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Due to the immediate need for social distancing, as well as widespread disruption in clinical practices, brought on by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic, medical student education rapidly shifted to a virtual format, which resulted in a variety of innovative and remotely accessible practices to address new restrictions on face-to-face education. Educators approached curriculum design seeking to replicate as much of the in-person experience as possible, and were faced with overcoming the challenges of replacing the innately hands-on nature of surgery with virtual operative and skills experiences. Restrictions on in-person visiting electives expedited the role of virtual education as a notable opportunity for medical student education and recruitment, with a variety of approaches to engaging undergraduate medical learners, including the use of live-streaming operative cases, virtual didactic curricula, and a rise in podcasts; web-based conferences; and virtual journal clubs. In addition to education, virtual outreach to medical students has become an essential tool in trainee recruitment and selection, and ongoing application of novel educational platforms will allow for new opportunities in multi-institutional collaboration and exchange with a multitude of benefits to future vascular surgery trainees. Our aim was to outline the resources and practices used to virtually teach and recruit medical students and the benefits of virtual rotations to the program and students.     

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global neurosurgical education: a systematic review

Neurosurgical Review - The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted neurosurgical training worldwide, with the shutdown of academic institutions and the reduction of elective surgical procedures. This...     

COVID-19 and surgery: A thematic analysis of unintended consequences on performance,practice and surgical training

PurposeThe shift in the national focus and allocation of resources to the management of COVID19 has led to significant changes to surgical practice including the delay of elective surgery. The aim of this study was to explore the implications of such changes on surgeons.MethodUsing a qualitative study design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with general surgery consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors from a major tertiary hospital in the Dublin region between March–May 2020. Data collection proceeded iteratively using a thematic analysis approach with quality controls such as memoing and collaborative analysis.ResultsFourteen surgeons (8 male, 6 female) were interviewed. The majority (n = 11, 78.6%) were NCHDs. Significant themes determined included ‘impacts’ on a variety of constructs such as performance, self-reported fatigue and wellbeing. Training themes elucidated included the effects of the cancellation of elective admissions on reduced operative exposure for trainees. Senior surgical staff were particularly focused on increased complexity in patient management. New policy requirements such as personal protective equipment use and novel rotas have had implications for aspects of work engagement. The pandemic and subsequent national restrictions imposed has afforded opportunities for improved well-being but also resulted in greater solitude in surgeons.ConclusionsRhetoric surrounding fatigue management and virus control dominates the conversation on the relationship between COVID-19 and surgery. Tipping the balance back to parity of fatigue management with service delivery in surgery will be key for sustainability of the surgical workforce.     

Response to COVID-19 pandemic: Beyond medical education in Brazil

We received a response to our Editorial from a group in Brazil that raised valuable concerns about the struggles in transforming medical education in low-income countries. Here, we address the concerns they raised that reinforce the global need for a "Coalition for Medical Education."     

Impact of CoVID-19 on resident and fellow education: Current guidance and future opportunities for urologic oncology training programs

Coronavirus Disease 2019 has impacted all aspects of urologic training. Didactics have shifted to a virtual platform and new approaches to surgical training have been undertaken. There has been a shift in research away from the laboratory space, with an increased focus on clinical outcomes and multi-institutional collaborations. Finally, there have been impacts on home life, questions about time away from work, case logs and case minimums, as well as how to manage resident and fellow reassignment. Herein, we review the current state of urologic education in the United States, focusing specifically on urologic oncology and highlight opportunities for the future.     

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cerebrovascular disease

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes a systemic disease that affects nearly all organ systems through infection and subsequent dysregulation of the vascular endothelium. One of the most striking phenomena has been a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–associated coagulopathy. Given these findings, questions naturally emerged about the prothrombotic impact of COVID-19 on cerebrovascular disease and whether ischemic stroke is a clinical feature specific to COVID-19 pathophysiology. Early reports from China and several sites in the northeastern United States seemed to confirm these suspicions. Since these initial reports, many cohort studies worldwide observed decreased rates of stroke since the start of the pandemic, raising concerns for a broader impact of the pandemic on stroke treatment. In this review, we provide a comprehensive assessment of how the pandemic has affected stroke presentation, epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on cerebrovascular disease. Much evidence suggests that this decline in stroke admissions stems from the global response to the virus, which has made it more difficult for patients to get to the hospital once symptoms start. However, there does not appear to be a demonstrable impact on quality metrics once patients arrive at the hospital. Despite initial concerns, there is insufficient evidence to ascribe a causal relationship specific to the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 on the cerebral vasculature. Nevertheless, when patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 present with stroke, their presentation is likely to be more severe, and they have a markedly higher rate of in-hospital mortality than patients with either acute ischemic stroke or COVID-19 alone.     

The impact of formal education and training on urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom: a survey

AIM: A previous survey of personnel performing urodynamics had shown that half of the respondents thought that their training had been inadequate. In order to address this the outcome of a 4-day practical course for teaching urodynamics, which has been running since 1995 at the Bristol Urological Institute, was reviewed. We were not aware of any published studies that have assessed the impact of formal urodynamic training on clinical practice. With this in mind we set out to determine whether the education and training we had given had changed urodynamic practice in the UK. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent out to 84 delegates who had attended the course over a 2-year period (2001-2003). Paired questionnaires were used to assess urodynamic practice before and after the course and also to establish whether their practice had changed as a direct result of attending the certificate course. RESULTS: The results suggested that 79% of those responders had changed their practice since completing the course. Significant changes to practice were observed in checking calibration, confidence in setting-up equipment, interpretation of urodynamic traces and ability to check the accuracy of the results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey suggest that attendance at a recognised urodynamic training course has had an impact on clinical practice in the UK. Training and education raises the level of confidence and ability to perform and interpret urodynamic investigations, which has wide implications for the accuracy, reliability and consistency of urodynamic investigations performed by those without formal training.     

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on vascular registries and clinical trials

Quality improvement programs and clinical trial research experienced disruption due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Vascular registries showed an immediate impact with significant declines in second-quarter vascular procedure volumes witnessed across Europe and the United States. To better understand the magnitude and impact of the pandemic, organizations and study groups sent grass roots surveys to vascular specialists for needs assessment. Several vascular registries responded quickly by insertion of COVID-19 variables into their data collection forms. More than 80% of clinical trials have been reported delayed or not started due to factors that included loss of enrollment from patient concerns or mandated institutional shutdowns, weighing the risk of trial participation on patient safety. Preliminary data of patients undergoing vascular surgery with active COVID-19 infection show inferior outcomes (morbidity) and increased mortality. Disease-specific vascular surgery study collaboratives about COVID-19 were created for the desire to study the disease in a more focused manner than possible through registry outcomes. This review describes the pandemic effect on multiple VASCUNET registries including Germany (GermanVasc), Sweden (SwedVasc), United Kingdom (UK National Vascular Registry), Australia and New Zealand (bi-national Australasian Vascular Audit), as well as the United States (Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative). We will highlight the continued collaboration of VASCUNET with the Vascular Quality Initiative in the International Consortium of Vascular Registries as part of the Medical Device Epidemiology Network coordinated registry network. Vascular registries must remain flexible and responsive to new and future real-world problems affecting vascular patients.     

The impact of COVID-19 on burn referrals received via telemedicine

BackgroundBurn referrals make up a significant proportion of the referrals received by the on-call Plastics surgery team at University Hospital Plymouth (UHP). UHP is a burns facility that takes referrals that are< 10% total body surface area (TBSA) in adults and< 5% in children. Since switching to a telemedicine service in 2018, this has had the benefit of not needing to see the patient face-to-face. It allows for direct advice given over the phone enabling immediate treatment to be administered. In addition it prevents unnecessary referrals. The COVID-19 pandemic has meant that more people are spending time at home and this study aims to see if this has had an impact on the number of referrals received.MethodsData was collected retrospectively over 2 years 2019 and 2020 from MDSAS telemedicine service. The outcome of each referral was recorded as advice given, seen in outpatients or patient admitted. The total for each year was calculated and compared. Also recorded was the age of the patient, the referring unit, the type of burn and the TBSA.ResultsA 19.3% increase in referrals received during the year of 2020. The most common age group for a burn referral was the 0–5 years age group; the number of referrals increased by 8.4% in this age group in the year of lockdown. Scalds and contact burns remained the highest mechanism of injury. TBSA of 0.5% was the most common TBSA over both years. Over 47% of referrals travelled from over 30 miles away. The majority of referrals were either seen in outpatients or given advice only. Burn referrals were most commonly over-estimated, 23.2% of burn referrals in 2019 and 20.9% in 2020 were over estimated by> 1% TBSA. 5.5% of referrals were under-estimated.ConclusionThere was an increase in the number of referrals during COVID-19. Overall there were a very low number of inappropriate referrals. The telemedicine system has impacted positively in time efficiency especially during COVID-19. It has meant that advice can be given without seeing the patient directly leading to both benefits for the patient and the department.     

Referral pattern for urologic malignancies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has required significant restructuring of healthcare with conservation of resources and maintaining social distancing standards. With these new initiatives, it is conceivable that the diagnosis of cancer care may be delayed. We aimed to evaluate differences in patient populations being evaluated for cancer before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods and MaterialsWe performed a retrospective review of our electronic medical record and examined patient characteristics of those presenting for a possible new cancer diagnosis to our urologic oncology clinic. Data was analyzed using logistic and linear regression models.ResultsDuring the 3-month period before the COVID-19 pandemic began, 585 new patients were seen in one urologic oncology practice. The following 3-month period, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 362 patients were seen, corresponding to a 38% decline. Visits per week increased to pre-COVID-19 levels for kidney and bladder cancer as the county entered the green phase. Prostate cancer visits per week remained below pre-COVID-19 levels in the green phase. When the 2 populations pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 were compared, there were no notable differences on regression analysis.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic decreased the total volume of new patient referrals for possible genitourinary cancer diagnoses. The impact this will have on cancer survival remains to be determined.     

新型冠状病毒肺炎患者集中救治护理应急培训方案构建及实践

目的构建新型冠状病毒肺炎患者集中救治护理应急培训方案并推进实践,为建立健全突发重大公共卫生事件中护理人员培养和使用提供参考。方法基于CIPP模型的背景、输入、过程、产出评估及柯式模型的行为层、结果层评价,构建护理人员"岗前-在岗"两阶段双向式培训方案,对1 318名新型冠状病毒肺炎隔离病区储备及在岗护理人员进行培训。结果 1 318名护理人员均参与隔离病区工作,无护理人员感染新型冠状病毒肺炎。进入隔离病区1周后812名护理人员发回调查问卷,对培训满意731人(90.02%),认为能够胜任隔离病房岗位工作773人(95.20%)。结论在突发重大公共卫生事件中,"岗前-在岗"两阶段双向式应急培训能快速培养胜任新型冠状病毒肺炎救治工作的护理人员,提升培训效果。