Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of the prostate biopsy remains controversial. There is a need to avoid detection of insignificant cancer but not to miss significant and curable tumors. In alternative treatments of prostate cancer, repeated sextant biopsies are used to estimate the response. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a repeated systematic sextant biopsy as the standard biopsy technique in patients with significant tumors which are being considered for curative treatment. METHODS: Systematic sextant biopsy was performed in vitro in 92 radical prostatectomy specimens. Of these patients, 81 (88.0%) had palpable lesions. RESULTS: Of the 92 investigated patients, 70 (76.1%) had potentially curable pT2-3pN0 prostate cancers. In these patients, the cancer was detected only in 72.9% of cases by a repeated in vitro biopsy. In the pT2 tumors, there was a detection rate of only 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the fact that a considerable number of significant and potentially curable tumors remain undetected by the conventional sextant biopsy. A negative sextant biopsy does not rule out significant prostate cancer.     

Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound (PD-TRUS) and its guided prostate biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml and to evaluate its impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection in men undergoing first and repeat biopsies. METHODS: A total of 136 consecutive referred men with serum total PSA (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml (mean age 64 +/- 9 years, range 45-82) and a normal digital rectal examination were included. 101 underwent a first biopsy whereas 35 had repeat biopsy. Gray-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and PD-TRUS (B&K Medical, Denmark) were performed in lithotomy position before and during the biopsy procedure. Vascularity accumulation and perfusion characteristics were recorded and graded as normal or abnormal in the peripheral zone of the prostate. A Vienna-nomogram based biopsy regime was performed in all patients on first biopsy and a special biopsy regime on repeat biopsy plus additional biopsies from abnormal sites on PD-TRUS. RESULTS: Overall PCa detection rate was 34.7% and 25.7% and abnormal accumulation on PD-TRUS was identified in 42.3% and 48.6% on first and repeat biopsy, respectively. The PCa detection rate, on first and repeat biopsy in patients with and without PD-TRUS accumulation were 67.4% versus 10.3% (p < 0.001) and 47.05% versus 5.6% (p = 0.0049), respectively. PD-TRUS directed biopsies were positive in 5.7% and 11.1% on first and repeat biopsy whereas PCa detection using the routine prostate biopsy regime was 94.3% and 88.9% on first and repeat biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PD-TRUS signal alone for PCa detection on first biopsy was 82.8%, 78.8%, 87.9% and 89.7%, respectively, and 88.8%, 68.0%, 47.0% and 94.4% on repeat biopsy, respectively. In comparison, the results PD-TRUS guided biopsies were 53.8%, 59.1%, 16.7%, and 89.5%, on first biopsy, respectively, and 20.0%, 13.3%, 23.5%, 11.1% on repeat biopsy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Negative PD-TRUS signal is able to exclude most of the patients without PCa in the PSA range of 2.5-10 ng/ml. As an additional tool at TRUS biopsy PD-TRUS has a high negative predictive value and may help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.     

Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis?

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy of the prostate has been a standard diagnostic approach for prostate cancer over the past thirty years. Today, the role of TRUS biopsy is being challenged by transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy due to concerns over the safety and diagnostic yield of TRUS biopsy. TRUS biopsy still offers a convenient, reliable and accessible tool for diagnosing prostate cancer in the majority of patients. It continues to play a role in prostate cancer diagnosis, especially where hospital resource allocation is limited, including the public sector. TRUS biopsy has low rates of severe complications, although there remains room for improvement in current practice to improve the tolerability and reduce the incidence of post-biopsy infection.     

Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy for detecting prostate cancer: can random biopsies be reduced using the 4-dimensional technique?

We present our experience with a new technique of real time 3-dimensional sonography—“4-dimensional Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)” guided prostate biopsy. A total of 64 patients suspected of having prostate cancer based on an elevated prostate-specific antigen (greater than 4 ng/ml) formed the study group. A voluson (General Electric Vivid 3) ultrasound machine equipped with a transrectal 5–8 MHz curvilinear transducer was used. Sonography-guided prostate biopsy was performed following prostate imaging and volume calculation using 3D and 4D imaging. Biopsies of tumor suspicious areas, if present, as well as random biopsies were done. Histopathology showed prostate cancer in 15 (23.4%) and benign prostatic conditions in 49 (76.6%). TRUS examination in the 15 detected prostatic cancers showed that 6(40%) were hypoechoic, 4 (26.7%) were of mixed hypo and hyper echogenicity, 1 (6.7%) was hyperechoic, and 4 (26.7%) were isoechoic. TRUS finding of a hypoechoic lesion was significantly associated with malignancy. Other TRUS findings such as texture, calcification, and cysts did not show any association with malignancy. Mortality was zero after ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. TRUS is the diagnostic test of choice in detection of prostate cancer. With advances in the technique of TRUS, effort is being made to identify more subtle lesions in order to reduce random biopsies. 4-Dimensional TRUS does improve the diagnostic accuracy but there is still a group of patients with “invisible” cancers. Therefore, the policy of random biopsies has to be continued till this incidence can be eliminated.     

Assessment of men’s risk thresholds to proceed with prostate biopsy for the early detection of prostate cancer

Purpose

To delineate the range of “risk thresholds” for prostate biopsy to determine how improved prostate cancer (CaP) risk prediction tools may impact shared decision-making (SDM).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving men 45–75 years old attending a multispecialty urology clinic. Data included demographics, personal and family prostate cancer history, and prostate biopsy history. Respondents were presented with a summary of the details, risks, and benefits of prostate biopsy, then asked to indicate the specific risk threshold (% chance) of high-grade CaP at which they would proceed with prostate biopsy.

Results

Of a total of 103 respondents, 18 men (17%) had a personal history of CaP, and 31 (30%) had undergone prostate biopsy. The median risk threshold to proceed with prostate biopsy was 25% (interquartile range 10–50%). Risk thresholds did not vary by race, education, or employment. Personal history of CaP or prostate biopsy was significantly associated with lower mean risk thresholds (19% vs. 32% [P?=?0.02] and 23% vs. 33% [P?=?0.04], respectively). In the lowest versus highest risk threshold quartiles, there were significantly higher rates of CaP (36% vs. 1%, P?=?0.01) and prior prostate biopsy (46% vs. 17%, P?<?0.01).

Conclusions

Men have a wide range of risk thresholds for high-grade CaP to proceed with prostate biopsy. Men with a prior history of CaP or biopsy reported lower risk thresholds, which may reflect their greater concern for this disease. The extent to which refined risk prediction tools will improve SDM warrants further study.

     

3D Navigo™ versus TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection

Introduction

To overcome the limitations regarding transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies in prostate cancer (PCa) detection, there is a focus on new imaging technologies. The Navigo? system (UC-care, Israel) uses regular TRUS images and electrospatial monitoring to generate a 3D model of the prostate. The aim of this study was to compare cancer detection rates between the Navigo? system and conventional TRUS, in patients without a history of PCa.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study by collecting data from all patients who underwent 12-core prostate biopsies from lateral peripheral zones between September 2013 and February 2015 at the Jeroen Bosch Hospital in ‘s-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands).

Results

A total of 325 patients met our inclusion criteria. 77.8 % of biopsy sessions were performed using the Navigo? system. There was no statistically significant difference in PCa detection (39.9 vs 46.2 % with Navigo? system and TRUS, respectively). Using the Navigo? system for taking prostate biopsies proved not to be associated with the presence of PCa at biopsy, likewise for clinically significant PCa and for both subgroups.

Limitations

The limitations of the study include its retrospective design, the limited number of patients in the conventional TRUS group, the statistically significant different number of biopsy sessions and the ones performed by an advanced physician in both groups.

Conclusion

In our study, there is no added value of 3D TRUS using Navigo? system compared to conventional 2D TRUS regarding PCa detection in biopsy-naive men and men with prior negative biopsy.

     

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: is the pretreatment prostate volume important?

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively determine the effect of prostate volume on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in terms of changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and to determine whether prostate volume affects the retention rate after brachytherapy, as there is concern that patients with larger prostates might develop more troublesome LUTS after brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively identified 100 consecutive patients who had brachytherapy for prostate cancer, using a real‐time three‐dimensional seed implantation technique, at one institution. At each follow‐up review the IPSS was recorded. To determine the effect of prostate volume on the IPSS after treatment the patients were divided into two groups according to prostate volume at brachytherapy (<50 and ≥50 mL).

RESULTS

The median patient age was 62 years, the overall median prostate volume was 42 mL and the median intraoperative D90 was 190 Gy. The pretreatment IPSS was 4 and 8 for the <50 and ≥50 mL groups, respectively, and at 3 months after brachytherapy the median IPSS increased to 18 and 20 for the two groups, respectively. Eleven patients went into acute retention of urine after brachytherapy (six in the ≥50 mL group).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients with prostates of ≥50 mL have an IPSS comparable with those who have prostates of <50 mL. Large prostates should not be considered an exclusion criterion when an intraoperative planning technique is used for brachytherapy.     

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsy results

PurposeWe aimed to determine the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound–guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-B) results.Materials and methodsBetween 2010 and 2013, 2,416 men underwent TRUS-B or an mpMRI or both at Vancouver General Hospital. Among these, 283 men had persistent suspicion of PCa despite prior negative TRUS-B finding. An MRI was obtained in 112, and a lesion (prostate imaging reporting and data system score ≥3) was identified in 88 cases (78%). A subsequent combined MRI-targeted and standard template biopsy was performed in 86 cases. A matching cohort of 86 patients was selected using a one-nearest neighbor method without replacement. The end points were the rate of diagnosis of PCa and significant PCa (sPCa) (Gleason>6, or>2 cores, or>50% of any core).ResultsMRI-targeted TRUS-B detected PCa and sPCa in 36 (41.9%) and 30 (34.9%) men when compared with 19 (22.1%) and 14 (16.3%), respectively, men without mpMRI (P = 0.005 for both). In 9 cases (10.4%), MRI-targeted TRUS-B detected sPCa that was missed on standard cores. sPCa was present in 6 cases (6.9%) on standard cores but not the targeted cores. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate imaging reporting and data system score and prostate-specific antigen density>0.15 ng/ml² were statistically significant predictors of significant cancer detection (odds ratio = 14.93, P<0.001 and odds ratio = 6.19, P = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionIn patients with prior negative TRUS-B finding, MRI-targeted TRUS-B improves the detection rate of all PCa and sPCa.     

Screening for prostate cancer: have you had your cholesterol measured?

Screening for prostate cancer has become one of the most common topics of conversation at urological oncology meetings. Most people have a bias as to whether there should or should not be a national screening programme. Unfortunately there are many unanswered questions, which may or may not be possible to answer definitively. In a balanced and scholarly review of the subject, Professor Peter Boyle indicates several flaws in the agreement for screening, but feels that PSA testing will continue unabated. The authors from the University of Stellenbosch review the plentiful literature relating to testicular torsion and functional recovery. They also review the mechanism of injury and the effect on the contralateral testis.