Atypical antipsychotic augmentation of mood stabilizer therapy in bipolar disorder

Although monotherapy with lithium or divalproex is the recommended initial therapy for bipolar disorder, these agents are associated with prolonged favorable outcomes in only 30% of patients. Increasingly, the medical literature is demonstrating that augmentation of mood stabilizers with atypical antipsychotics is a more effective therapy. This form of combination therapy is recommended as first-line treatment for severe bipolar mania. Recent clinical studies have shown that augmentation therapy with the atypical antipsychotics risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone is effective in long-term maintenance treatment, and preliminary evidence is emerging that use of atypicals with mood stabilizers can help control the depressive phase of bipolar disorder. The atypical antipsychotics also have relatively mild side effect profiles, although augmentation therapy with some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers has been associated with excessive weight gain.     

Comparative efficacy of typical and atypical antipsychotics as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers in the treatment of acute mania.

BACKGROUND: Typical antipsychotics are commonly used in combination with mood stabilizers for acute mania. Although typical antipsychotics are effective, they have undesirable side effects such as induction of depressive symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. Atypical antipsychotics have more favorable side effect profiles, and recent evidence shows their efficacy in treating mania. Apart from a previous small study that compared risperidone with typical neuroleptics as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers, no studies to date have directly compared atypical antipsychotics with typical antipsychotics as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers in a clinically relevant, naturalistic setting. METHOD: This study is a chart review of all patients with DSM-IV-defined bipolar disorder, current episode mania (N = 204), admitted to the University of British Columbia Hospital during a 30-month period. Patients were separated into 3 groups according to the medications used: (1) mood stabilizer and typical antipsychotic, (2) mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotic, and (3) combination: mood stabilizer plus a typical antipsychotic, then switched to mood stabilizer plus risperidone or olanzapine within I week. The atypical group was further subdivided into risperidone and olanzapine subgroups. Outcome was measured using Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) ratings generated by review of clinical information in the chart. RESULTS: Patients treated with typical antipsychotics were more severely ill at admission and at discharge than those treated with atypical antipsychotics. Patients in the atypical (p < .005) and combination (p < .05) groups showed significantly greater clinical improvement at discharge than patients treated with typical antipsychotics. This difference was also significant in the subset of patients with psychotic features (p < .03). Risperidone and olanzapine were associated with fewer extrapyramidal side effects than were typical antipsychotics (risperidone vs. typical antipsychotics, chi2 = 8.72, p < .01; olanzapine vs. typical antipsychotics, chi2 = 16.9, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Due to their superior effectiveness and side effect profile when compared with typical antipsychotics. atypical antipsychotics are an excellent choice as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers for the treatment of patients with mania.     

Adjunctive risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine for the treatment of hospitalized patients with bipolar I disorder: a retrospective study

This study evaluated the overall effectiveness and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics (risperidone vs. olanzapine vs. quetiapine) used in the treatment of bipolar inpatients. After screening 463 patients, the medical records of 158 inpatients with bipolar I disorder, who were given olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine as adjuncts to mood stabilizers for at least 1 month and not administered with any other antipsychotics, were examined. Details of the tolerability and effectiveness were reviewed according to the treatment records during their hospital stay. The results showed equivalent effectiveness based on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) score between the three atypical antipsychotics. The frequency of the extrapyramidal symptom-related side effects were higher in the risperidone-treated group than in the olanzapine and quetiapine-treated group. This suggests that risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine have a comparable effectiveness in inpatients with bipolar I disorder in a naturalistic setting. However, there were some differences in tolerability between these results as reported from previous Western studies.     

Topiramate in Bipolar and Schizoaffective Disorders: Weight Loss and Efficacy

BACKGROUND: Although useful in bipolar disorder, mood stabilizers, such as lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine, can cause significant weight gain. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 5 patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder who were treated with topiramate as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy. RESULTS: All 5 patients had a good response to treatment at a mean topiramate dose of 195 mg/day (range, 100-375 mg/day). All patients lost a substantial amount of weight on topiramate treatment. The average weight loss was 22 lb (10 kg; range, 8-56 lb [4-25 kg]). None of the patients discontinued topiramate because of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topiramate may represent a valuable alternative to existing mood stabilizers, either as an adjunct or as monotherapy in patients with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder.     

Pediatric bipolar disorder: emerging diagnostic and treatment approaches

Children and adolescents who have bipolar disorder often are encountered in clinical settings and frequently require treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics. New screening and diagnostic tools are available to aid in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Additional data supporting the use of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics in this population also are emerging. Combinations of existing psychotropics remain the most effective treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder at this point. This article reviews the phenomenology and clinical characteristics of pediatric bipolar disorder and current approaches to pharmacotherapy. It is becoming apparent that bipolar disorder is often a chronic disorder in children and adolescents, much like diabetes, and is best managed with a combination of medications and psychosocial therapy.     

Clinical research on antipsychotics in bipolar disorder

Antipsychotics are commonly used in bipolar disorder, both for acute mania and in maintenance treatment. The authors review available clinical research concerning the use of both conventional and atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder and present recommendations for a number of key clinical situations based on this review. They also consider a number of important related questions, including whether there is evidence for an increased risk of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in patients with bipolar disorder, the potential role for antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression, the role of antipsychotics in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, the potential for antipsychotics to induce depression in bipolar illness, and whether antipsychotics can be considered mood stabilizers with a place as monotherapy for bipolar mania. They conclude that standard treatment for acute mania should begin with a mood stabilizer, with benzodiazepines used as an adjunct for mild agitation or insomnia and antipsychotics used as an adjunct for highly agitated, psychotic, or severely manic patients. They also conclude that atypical antipsychotics are preferable to conventional antispychotics because of their more favorable side effect profile and reduced risk of tardive dyskinesia. They review the evidence for using atypical antipsychotics as first-line monotherapy for mania and conclude that more evidence concerning the risk of TD and their efficacy as maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder is needed before a conclusion can be made. Should the eventual risk of TD associated with atypical antipsychotics be found to be minimal and their efficacy in maintenance treatment found to be high, they could eventually be considered first line monotherapy for bipolar disorder. They conclude that treatment with an antipsychotic during bipolar depression should be limited to those patients who have psychosis and that atypical antipsychotics are preferred over conventional antipsychotics in this situation, not only because of their reduced risk of side effects but also because theoretically they may have antidepressant efficacy due to their effects on the serotonin system. The clinical research findings summarized in the article are, for the most part, supported by a recently published guideline based on a consensus of clinical experts.     

Pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials in acute bipolar mania to summarize available data on drug treatment of mania. METHODS: We included trials of medications licensed in the USA or UK for the treatment of any phase of bipolar disorder. Outcomes investigated were changes in mania scores, attrition, extrapyramidal effects and weight change. Data were combined through meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 13 studies (involving 3,089 subjects) and identified 2 studies for each of the following medications: carbamazepine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, valproate semisodium and aripiprazole. All drugs showed significant benefit compared with placebo for reduction in mania scores. Compared with placebo, for all antipsychotics pooled, response to treatment (> or =50% reduction in Young Mania Rating Scale scores) was increased more than 1.7 times [relative risk (RR) = 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.54, 1.96]; for all mood stabilizers pooled, response to treatment was doubled (RR 2.01, 95% CI = 1.66, 2.43). Overall withdrawals were 34% fewer (24-43%) with antipsychotics, and 26% fewer (10-39%) with mood stabilizers. However, for carbamazepine, aripiprazole and lithium an increase in risk of withdrawal could not be excluded. Small but significant increases in extrapyramidal side effects occurred with risperidone and aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotics and mood stabilizers are significantly more effective than placebo for the treatment of acute mania. Their effect sizes are similar. Small differences between effect sizes may be due to differences in the patients included in the studies or to chance. Carbamazepine and lithium may be more poorly tolerated, and antipsychotics cause more extrapyramidal side effects.     

双相障碍不同首选用药间处方方式、不良反应、经济负担、依从性比较

目的比较首选心境稳定剂和首选抗精神病药治疗的双相障碍患者处方方式、不良反应、经济负担及药物治疗依从性等。方法对河北省11个地市39家精神卫生机构中接受心境稳定剂或抗精神病药治疗的240例双相障碍患者,采用自制调查问卷、临床总体印象病情严重程度量表(clinical global impressions scale-severity of illness,CGI-SI)、不良反应量表(treatment emergent symptom scale,TESS)、药物依从性评定量表(medication adherence rating scale,MARS)进行社会人口学、疾病临床特征、处方方式(联合用药情况)、精神类药物花费、不良反应及治疗依从性等方面的调查。结果首选抗精神病药治疗者(抗精神病药组)152例(63.3%),首选心境稳定剂治疗者(心境稳定剂组)88例(36.7%)。抗精神病药组与心境稳定剂组相比,住院患者构成比(90.1%vs.76.1%)、伴有精神病性症状患者构成比(27.0%vs.11.4%)、不良反应发生率(46.1%vs.31.8%)、精神类药物日花费(中位数12.00元vs.8.37元)和总花费(中位数344.61元vs.144.64元)均较高(P0.05)。但两组间药物处方方式、不良反应严重程度、MARS总分无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论河北省双相障碍患者以首选抗精神病药治疗为主,但首选抗精神病药并未减少之后的联合用药,且不良反应发生率及药物经济负担均明显高于首选心境稳定剂治疗者,所以心境稳定剂仍应作为双相障碍主要首选用药。     

Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar affective disorders

Antipsychotics are commonly used in the treatment of bipolar affective disorder. The use of conventional antipsychotic agents, though effective as antimanic agents, is associated with a number of limitations such as their acute side effect profile and their unsufficient mood stabilizing activity. In addition, exposure to conventional neuroleptics poses a risk for the development of tardive dyskinesia, especially in mood disorder patients. Growing evidence suggests that the novel, so-called atypical neuroleptics may offer a number of advantages in the treatment of bipolar disorder, including their thymoleptic activity and minimal risk for acute and long-term extraypyramidal symptoms. Clinical experience with clozapine and olanzapine as mood stabilizers suggests greater antimanic than antidepressant properties, while risperidone may have greater antidepressant properties with some liability for triggering or exacerbating mania. The mood stabilizing properties of further atypical drugs are currently under investigation. This review focuses on the use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar disorder. We also present an overview concerning potential pharmakokinetic interactions based on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system when antipsychotics are combined with other mood stabilizing compounds. In conclusion, atypical antipsychotics should come to play an increasingly important role in the acute and long-term management of bipolar disorder, but there is a clear need for further controlled trials in this indication.     

Novel antipsychotics in bipolar and schizoaffective mania

OBJECTIVE: Novel antipsychotics are increasingly used in the treatment of bipolar and schizoaffective mania. This paper presents an overview of the controlled studies in this field. METHOD: Using cross-references, a computerized search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE psychiatry covering the period 1990-2002. RESULTS: Olanzapine and risperidone, added to mood stabilizers, and olanzapine as monotherapy enjoy the most evidential support in terms of efficacy and side-effect profile for their use in acute bipolar mania. The use of modern antipsychotics in bipolar prophylaxis and in both the short- and long-term treatment of schizomania has not been widely studied yet. CONCLUSION: More controlled trials are still needed comparing modern antipsychotics as monotherapy and adjunctive to mood stabilizers with conventional antipsychotics, lithium, anticonvulsants and with each other in short-term and, especially, maintenance treatment of (schizo)mania. Partly based on controlled studies, olanzapine, risperidone and other modern antipsychotics could become preferable for these indications.     

A naturalistic comparison of clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine in the treatment of bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the overall efficacy and tolerability of novel antipsychotic medications for patients with bipolar disorder type I. METHOD: A retrospective study of the Massachusetts General Hospital Bipolar Clinic database was carried out to identify 50 consecutive treatment trials in patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder type I who had received adjunctive treatment with risperidone, olanzapine, or clozapine, along with standard mood stabilizers. The treatment charts of those patients (N = 42) were reviewed for details of adverse effects, tolerability, and efficacy of medication. RESULTS: Overall results indicated equivalent efficacy in novel antipsychotic treatments according to change in Clinical Global Impressions scale score. Levels of extrapyramidal symptoms were similar in all groups and occurred in 12/42 patients (28.6%). Prolactin-related side effects were not observed in any patients. There were no cases of affective switch or worsening of mania. Substantial weight gain of more than 10 lb (4.5 kg) was significantly greater in patients treated with olanzapine. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone, olanzapine, and clozapine are similar in patients with bipolar disorder. One major differentiation factor of these drugs appears to be weight gain, particularly between olanzapine and risperidone. This may, in part, also be related to the need to use mood-stabilizing agents, like lithium or divalproex sodium, which may potentiate the weight-gain effect of novel antipsychotics.     

Maintenance therapies in bipolar disorder: focus on randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: Lithium remains the cornerstone of maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder despite growing use of other agents, including divalproex, lamotrigine, carbamazepine and the atypical antipsychotics. Lithium has the largest body of data to support its continued use as a prophylactic agent; however, most of this data comes from early studies that did not use contemporary analytic methods. Alternatives to lithium are needed because of the relatively high rate of non-response to lithium monotherapy and the drug's frequent side-effects. This article reviews available data with an emphasis on double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that examine the efficacy of lithium and other putative mood stabilizers: carbamazepine, divalproex, lamotrigine and olanzapine. METHOD: The authors reviewed key literature using Medline searches using key words: bipolar disorder, controlled trials, mood stabilizer, lithium, lomotrigine, divalproex, olanzapine, carbamazepine. RESULTS: Lithium remains the gold standard for overall preventative efficacy in bipolar disorder, especially to decrease manic or hypomanic relapse. Of the mood stabilizers that have marked prophylactic antimanic properties, lithium appears to possess the greatest antidepressant effect. Divalproex may also prevent recurrent bipolar mood episodes but the relative lack of controlled maintenance studies makes this less certain. There now exists an extensive and well-designed research database supporting the use of lamotrigine in the acute and prophylactic management of bipolar I disorder. Lamotrigine offers a spectrum of clinical effectiveness that complements lithium, in that it appears to stabilize mood 'from below baseline' by preventing episodes of depression and has been shown to be effective in rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder. Carbamazepine may be a useful alternative to lithium, divalproex and lamotrigine, particularly for patients with a history of mood-incongruent delusions and other comorbidities, but controlled data is more equivocal and it may lose some of its prophylactic effect over time. Emerging data continue to support the growing use of atypical antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine. CONCLUSIONS: Any monotherapy for use as a maintenance therapy of bipolar disorder appears to be inadequate for long-term use in the management of the majority of patients with bipolar disorder. Combination therapy has become the standard of care in the treatment of bipolar disorder and particularly in patients with treatment-refractory variants such as those with rapid-cycling. The emerging consensus is that patients on monotherapy, if followed for sufficiently long periods, will eventually require concomitant treatment to maintain a full remission. There exists a need for controlled trials that use random assignment to parallel arms including combination therapy followed by data analyses that include both relapse rate and survival techniques.     

Pharmacotherapy of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.

The identification and treatment of children and adolescents with a bipolar disorder is often challenging and difficult. Many of the psychotropic agents used to treat adults with bipolar disorder may also be-used to treat children and adolescents with these disorders. Further controlled trials using combination pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar disorders are needed to advance the field of pediatric bipolarity and provide optimal care for these patients. There are multiple ongoing trials of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics that will provide important controlled data that are currently lacking in the field.     

Atypical antipsychotics: newer options for mania and maintenance therapy

Atypical antipsychotics have been used to treat patients with schizophrenia for many years, but now there is increasing evidence of their utility in the treatment of bipolar disorder. In the past few years several atypical agents have received regulatory approval for use in bipolar mania. Through a review of randomized controlled trials for five commonly used atypical drugs, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole, this article evaluates their efficacy in the acute and maintenance phases of bipolar disorder. The evidence shows that atypical antipsychotics are effective in the treatment of manic symptoms, either alone or in combination with traditional mood stabilizers such as lithium and divalproex. Although emerging data indicate that atypical antipsychotics will be a promising addition to those therapies that are currently available for managing patients during the maintenance phase of bipolar illness, their potential in the long-term management of bipolar disorder remains to be fully explored.
Atypical antipsychotics appear to have broadly similar efficacy against manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, but there are important differences in their tolerability profiles, which are likely to be of particular relevance during long-term treatment. A brief assessment of tolerability issues surrounding the use of atypical agents in bipolar disorder and other aspects of treatment that have impact on the clinical effectiveness of the therapy are considered.     

Acute treatment of mania: An update on new medications

Acute mania is frequently a medical emergency requiring hospitalization for behavioral control, rapid resolution of irritability, agitation, de-escalation of mood, and decreasing of risk-taking behavior. Lithium efficacy in the management of acute mania was reported in 1949 and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1970. Chlorpromazine, from the class of typical antipsychotics, was approved for treatment of bipolar disorder in 1973. Typical antipsychotics were frequently used alone and as adjunct for the treatment of bipolar mania for the next 2 decades. Divalproex was approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute mania in 1994. Since the approval of olanzapine in 2000, all five atypical antipsychotics, namely risperidone (2003), quetiapine (2004), ziprasidone (2004), and aripiprazole (2004), have been approved by the FDA for the management of acute mania. Clozapine is the only atypical antipsychotic not FDA approved for any phase of bipolar disorder. This article will systematically review some of the major studies published, randomized controlled monotherapy, and adjunct therapy trials involving five atypical antipsychotics and newer anticonvulsants for the treatment of acute bipolar mania.     

Acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar mania: the role of atypical antipsychotics

Abstract:  Bipolar disorder is a complex condition including depression, mania, and in many cases associated with comorbid anxiety symptoms and substance abuse. Mood stabilizers including lithium and divalproex have been considered standard therapy for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder, but remission rates remain inadequate. Conventional antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy for acute mania, but they appear to have little role in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Despite substantial evidence of efficacy and recent guideline recommendations, atypical antipsychotics remain underused for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Data from double-blind, controlled trials are available for a number of clinically meaningful efficacy measures, including improvement in manic symptoms, onset of action, response rates, remission rates, improvement in comorbid depressive symptoms, and induction/worsening of mania or depression. Atypical antipsychotics are effective both as alternatives to lithium or divalproex as monotherapy, or in combination with these mood stabilizers, in the acute and likely the maintenance treatment of mania. The atypical antipsychotics represent an effective and relatively safe addition to our armamentarium for the treatment of bipolar disorder.     

Treatment adherence among patients with bipolar or manic disorder taking atypical and typical antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective claims-based study evaluated treatment adherence among patients with bipolar or manic disorder treated with atypical and typical antipsychotics. METHOD: Claims data for 18,158 antipsychotic treatment episodes in 15,224 commercially insured patients with bipolar or manic disorder (ICD-9-CM criteria), from January 1999 through August 2003, were evaluated. Overall adherence was measured by adherence intensity (medication possession ratio) and treatment duration (length of treatment episodes). Treatment-related factors that may affect medication adherence were also investigated. Pairwise comparisons of the individual atypicals and a combined group of leading typical antipsychotics were undertaken using multiple regression analysis adjusting for differing patient characteristics. RESULTS: Adherence intensity with quetiapine was 3% greater than with the typicals combined (p=.002) and was greater than with risperidone or olanzapine by 4% (p<.001) and 2% (p=.001), respectively. Olanzapine (2%, p<.001) and ziprasidone (3%, p=.001) showed significantly greater adherence intensity than risperidone. Risperidone (p=.002), olanzapine (p=.055), and the typicals (p=.021) demonstrated negative associations between dose and adherence intensity, while quetiapine showed a nonsignificant trend for a positive association (p=.074). Quetiapine and risperidone had significantly longer treatment durations than the typicals combined (1.05 and 1.00 months, respectively, p<.001) and longer treatment durations than olanzapine (0.75 and 0.79 months, respectively, p<.001) or ziprasidone (0.78 months, p=.002 and 0.69 months, p=.003, respectively). Shorter treatment durations were associated with switching to other antipsychotics or remaining on or switching to other psychotropics (e.g., traditional mood stabilizers) only. All of the atypicals except ziprasidone were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of switching compared with the typicals (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The claims-based findings of this study suggest that, for bipolar or manic disorder, quetiapine therapy may be associated with better treatment adherence than typical or some atypical antipsychotics. Estimated differences, however, were relatively small, particularly for adherence intensity.     

Neurochemical predictors of response to pharmacologic treatments for bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a common psychiatric disorder that is characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and often depression. Mood stabilizers and antipsychotics are first-line pharmacologic options for patients with bipolar disorder. However, the exact mechanisms by which these medications exert the mood stabilizing effects are unknown. Additionally, individuals with bipolar disorder often try several medications unsuccessfully before achieving mood stabilization. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a noninvasive neuroimaging technique that can be used to identify the neurochemical effects and predictors of response to medications commonly used to treat bipolar disorder. MRS may facilitate targeted treatment interventions and decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with this illness. Examining the mechanisms of action of pharmacologic agents used to treat bipolar disorder may clarify the neurophysiologic basis of bipolar disorder. We will review recent MRS investigations that have evaluated the neurochemical effects of pharmacologic treatments and predictors of treatment response in patients with bipolar disorder.     

The impact of response to previous mood stabilizer therapy on response to olanzapine versus placebo for acute mania

Objectives: A clinically important question for any new treatment for bipolar disorder is whether its efficacy extends to patients who have both responded and failed to respond to other mood stabilizers. In this secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled trial demonstrating olanzapine's efficacy for acute mania, we explore whether its usefulness extends to those patients with a history of poor response to other mood stabilizers.

Methods: This 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial studied olanzapine monotherapy 5–20 mg/day for hospitalized patients in acute manic or mixed bipolar episodes. The primary outcome variable was beginning to endpoint change in the Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) total score. We investigated whether prospectively identified history of recent failure to respond to other mood stabilizers predicted response to olanzapine.

Results: As previously reported, olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly greater improvement in Y-MRS total score and higher remission rates relative to placebo-treated patients. The current analysis compared these outcome parameters in patients with known poor prior response to lithium and/or valproate with all other patients and found no significant group by treatment interactions, i.e., treatment effects were not significantly diminished in non-responders to older mood stabilizing agents.

Conclusions: Olanzapine has been shown to be superior to placebo for the treatment of mania. This secondary analysis suggests that olanzapine monotherapy is similarly effective for patients whether or not they previously have failed to respond to another mood stabilizer for mania. A study limitation is that response to lithium or valproate was determined retrospectively.     

Pharmacotherapy of bipolar depression: An update

Bipolar affective disorder is a virulent illness with high rates of recurrence, disability, social impairment, and suicide. Although the manic or hypomanic episodes define the disorder, the depressions are more numerous and less responsive to treatment. As the initial depressive episodes are commonly misdiagnosed, initiation of therapy with mood stabilizers is often delayed, increasing the likelihood of treatment-emergent affective switches on antidepressant monotherapy. The empirical basis for selecting treatments for people with bipolar depression is weak, and only the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine has received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Conventional mood stabilizers are preferred for first-line therapies, although atypical antipsychotics are increasingly used, and FDA approval of quetiapine is pending. Antidepressants—particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bupropion— are indicated when mood stabilizers are ineffective and for “breakthrough“ depressions.