Rescue FK506 early conversion for refractory rejection after pediatric liver transplantation: experience in 20 children

Abstract Tacrolimus (FK506) is an effective and relatively safe novel immunosuppressant able to revert refractory rejection after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). Between April 1993 and October 1996, 20 pediatric patients were converted to tacrolimus for biopsy-proven, steroiD-resistant liver rejection. The mean follow-up was 18 months. The median time from LTx to switch was 20 days. Tacrolimus was administered per os at a mean dosage of 0.23 mg/kg per day to maintain median blood levels of 10.8 ng/ml at 1 week and 9.2 ng/ml at 1 year from the switch. Of the 20 patients, 15 are alive and they all recovered from rejection without the need of OKT3 after conversion. The major causes of death were: one multiorgan failure, two infections (cytomegalovirus Aspergillus ), one bowel perforation, and one posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. One patient experienced late side effects and was reconverted to cyclosporine when she was already rescued from hepatic allograft rejection. The results confirm that an earlier conversion to tacrolimus should be recommended after pediatric liver transplantation in order to revert hepatic allograft rejection with the best safety profile.     

Long-term results after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation for acute and chronic rejection

Tacrolimus is beneficial in liver transplantation for reversing steroid-resistant acute rejection, and for controlling the process of chronic rejection in allograft recipients receiving Cyclosporine- (CyA) based regimens. Very little is known about the long-term efficacy of tacrolimus in pediatric transplantation after conversion from CyA. Our study examines the long-term outcome after conversion to tacrolimus for acute or chronic rejection in pediatric liver transplant (LTx) recipients. METHOD: Seventy-three children (age < 18 years) receiving their primary LTx under CyA between August 1989 and April 1996 were converted to tacrolimus for ongoing acute rejection (n=22, group I) or chronic rejection (n=51, group II). Mean age at the time of conversion was 10.2+/-5.5 years with a mean interval from LTx to conversion of 3.5+/-2.9 (range 0.5-10.1 years). There were 33 boys and 40 girls. All patients were followed until June 1999. Mean follow-up was 97.3+/-17.4 months (range 62.4-118.9 months). RESULTS: Overall 5-year actual patient survival was 78.1% and 8-year actuarial survival was 74.6%. Patients converted to tacrolimus therapy to resolve acute rejection (group I) experience significantly better patient and graft survival at 5 and 8 years than those converted to resolve chronic rejection (group II). Eight-year patient survival and graft survival was 95.5 and 90.9% for group I compared to 74.6 and 53.5% for group II, respectively (long rank P=0.035 and 0.01, respectively). Nearly 75% of children were weaned off steroids after conversion. There was a marked improvement in hypertension, gum hyperplasia, hirsutism, and cushingoid appearance. One child in group I (4.5%) and four children in group II (7.8%) developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after conversion. There was an improvement in growth in children who were less than the age of 12 years at the time of conversion and who were weaned off steroids; more significantly girls responded more favorably than boys. CONCLUSION: The benefit of transplantation is maintained long-term after conversion to tacrolimus for acute or chronic rejection. The response rate was significantly better in group I as compared with group 11. Marked improvement in growth, hypertension, and reversal of the brutalizing effects of CyA was noted after conversion to tacrolimus. The results suggest that early conversion of pediatric liver transplant patients is warranted for the treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and for improvements in quality of life.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

In pediatric kidney transplant recipients, tacrolimus has been proposed either for primary immunosuppression or as a rescue agent for refractory acute rejection, chronic rejection, and cyclosporine toxicity. This paper describes our experience with tacrolimus conversion from cyclosporine-based therapy in six selected cases: four due to refractory acute rejections unresponsive to conventional therapy, one to chronic graft rejection, and one to cyclosporine-related hypertrichosis. A "simple-switch" conversion was used without any overlap, starting with a dose of 0.2 mg/kg per day. The time to conversion varied from 10 to 730 days after the transplant. In the patients with acute rejection, the median time to reversal after tacrolimus conversion was 12 days. The symptoms of the patient with cyclosporine toxicity completely resolved without any loss of allograft function. The patient with chronic rejection maintained stable renal function for more than 1 year after conversion. A new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and dose-related nephrotoxicity were recorded as adverse events. In conclusion, our experience suggests that tacrolimus can play an important role in the salvage treatment of pediatric kidney transplantations with deteriorating graft function due to acute rejection refractory to standard therapy. Tacrolimus conversion also provides excellent results in the presence of cyclosporine toxicity.     

Results of simultaneous and sequential pediatric liver and kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The indications for simultaneous and sequential pediatric liver (LTx) and kidney (KTx) transplantation have not been well defined. We herein report the results of our experience with these procedures in children with end-stage liver disease and/or subsequent end-stage renal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1984 and 1995, 12 LTx recipients received 15 kidney allografts. Eight simultaneous and seven sequential LTx/KTx were performed. There were six males and six females, with a mean age of 10.9 years (1.5-23.7). One of the eight simultaneous LTx/KTx was part of a multivisceral allograft. Five KTx were performed at varied intervals after successful LTx, one KTx was performed after a previous simultaneous LTx/KTx, and one KTx was performed after previous sequential LTx/KTx. Immunosuppression was with tacrolimus or cyclosporine and steroids. Indications for LTx were oxalosis (four), congenital hepatic fibrosis (two), cystinosis (one), polycystic liver disease (one), A-1-A deficiency (one), Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)-related (one), cryptogenic cirrhosis (one), and hepatoblastoma (one). Indications for KTx were oxalosis (four), drug-induced (four), polycystic kidney disease (three), cystinosis (one), and glomerulonephritis (1). RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 58 months (0.9-130), the overall patient survival rate was 58% (7/12). One-year and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 66% and 58%, respectively. Patient survival rates at 1 year after KTx according to United Network of Organ Sharing (liver) status were 100% for status 3, 50% for status 2, and 0% for status 1. The overall renal allograft survival rate was 47%. Actuarial renal allograft survival rates were 53% at 1 and 5 years. The overall hepatic allograft survival rate was equivalent to the overall patient survival rate (58%). Six of seven surviving patients have normal renal allograft function, and one patient has moderate chronic allograft nephropathy. All surviving patients have normal hepatic allograft function. Six (86%) of seven sequentially transplanted kidneys developed acute cellular rejection compared with only two (25%) of eight simultaneously transplanted kidneys (P<0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneously transplanted kidneys were less likely to develop rejection than sequentially transplanted kidneys in this series. This did not have any bearing on patient or graft survival rates. Mortality correlated directly with the severity of United Network of Organ Sharing status at the time of kidney transplantation. Candidates for simultaneous or sequential LTx/KTx should be prioritized based on medical stability to optimize distribution of scarce renal allografts.     

The impact on biochemical profiles and allograft function for patients converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus after clinical heart transplantation

Objective

Tacrolimus, a potent calcineurin inhibitor, is a widely used immunosuppressant. This study sought to determine whether conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus afforded benefits on biochemical profiles and graft function among Chinese heart transplantation recipients.

Methods

Forty-nine patients (44 men and 5 women) among 252 heart transplantations performed from 1995 to 2005 were converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus due to rejection (69%) or to cyclosporine intolerance (31%). The median age of these recipients at transplantation was 46.4 years (range, 5 months to 68 years). Their median body weight was 60 kg (range, 4-84 kg). The allograft median ischemic time was 145 minutes (range, 52-300 minutes). We compared the biochemical markers, rejection episodes and allograft function.

Results

The mean duration from heart transplantation to conversion was 419 days. After conversion, the serum bilirubin and alanine transaminase levels were significantly improved at 1 year. The lipid profiles, including triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein were nonsignificantly changed. The rejection episodes significantly decreased from 1.53 to 0.15 per patient per year (P < .001). The left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from 54.3 ± 17.9% to 63.2 ± 10.9% (P < .01). The right atrial pressure significantly decreased from 9.1 ± 5.8 mmHg to 6.3 ± 4.3 mm Hg (P < .01). The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure significantly decreased from 15.3 ± 9.5 mm Hg to 10.8 ± 5.3 mm Hg (P = .04).

Conclusion

In heart transplantation, conversion to tacrolimus owing to rejection or cyclosporine intolerance showed better liver profiles with fewer rejection episodes and improved graft function.     

预防晚期肝内胆管细胞癌肝移植术后复发的三联疗法疗效报道

目的研究分析三联疗法预防晚期肝内胆管细胞癌肝移植术后复发的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析1例晚期肝内胆管细胞癌肝移植术后临床及长期随访资料。术前诊断：肝脏继发性多发胆管细胞癌、原发性胆管细胞癌术后,行经典原位肝移植术。术后第2天开始1：3服他克莫司及吗替麦考酚酯,1周停用激素,1个月内逐渐撤出他克莫司由西罗奠司代替;术后第1天开始胸腺肽α-1连续皮下注射10d,1．6mg／次,1次／d,以后2次／周;槐耳颗粒：20g／次,3次／d。术后长期维持。定期监测患者术后AFP水平,排斥反应发生情况,生存时间、复发时间,记录分析诊疗经过及术后长期随访治疗。结果患者术后AFP水平较术前（112．81ng／m1）相比明显降低,术后1周、2周、1个月、3个月、6个月、1年和1．5年定期测定AFP水平为15．1ng／ml、23．2ng／ml、15．5ng／ml、13．0ng／ml、10．0ng／ml、7．8ng／ml和7．5ng／ml,长期维持在低水平状态,术后AFP平均水平：（13．144±5．472）ng／ml,t=3．798,P=0．009,差异具有统计学意义。术后定期复查腹部超声,移植肝血流正常,胆管未见明显狭窄,术后3个月、6个月、1年腹部超声及肝脏、肺脏cT均未发现肿瘤复发、转移迹象。结论预防晚期肝内胆管细胞癌肝移植术后复发三联疗法,可延长患者生存时间,术后未出现明显排斥反应,未出现肿瘤复发,AFP较术前相比长期维持在低水平。     

Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine--a based immunosuppression following liver transplantation

We examined the frequency, reasons and outcome after conversion from Tacrolimus to Cyclosporine A. From August 1989 to December 1992, 1000 consecutive liver transplantation patients were studied, which included 834 adults (age>18 yr.) and 166 children with mean follow-up of 77 months (range 56 to 96). A prospectively populated electronic database was queried to identify patients that underwent conversion, the clinical indication and outcomes. Thirty-seven out of 834 adult recipients (4.43%), mean age of 48.4+/-12.9 years, 19 male (51.35%) and 18 females (48.64%) required conversion from Tacrolimus to Cyclosporine A baseline immunosuppressive therapy. No pediatric patient required conversion. The mean time interval from liver transplantation to Cyclosporine A conversion was 443.45+/-441.44 days (range 22 to 1641). The clinical indications for conversion included: 20 neurological (54%), 6 gastrointestinal (16%), 5 hematological (14%), and 6 other (16%) scenarios. Seven of the 37 patients (18.9%) died. The causes of death were multi-organ failure (2), sepsis (2), pancreatitis (1), hepatic failure due to relapse of ethanol abuse (1), and unknown cause (1). Nine out of 37 patients (24.32%) had to be reconverted to Tacrolimus (mean 282.22+/-499.79 days; range 15 to 1583 day with a median of 135) after institution of Cyclosporine A; none showed recurrence of the original symptoms. The reasons for these re-conversions were acute cellular rejection (44%, n=4), chronic rejection (11%, n=1), increased hepatic enzymes (33%, n=3) and progressively worsening neurological symptoms (11%, n=1). The frequency of conversion from Tacrolimus to Cyclosporine A was 4.43%. Conversion is safe and efficacious if done in a controlled setting. Additionally, re-conversion to Tacrolimus for lack of efficacy of Cyclosporine A did not appear to be associated with a recurrence of the condition that caused the initial switch.     

Renal function after pediatric intestinal transplant

Data were analyzed from 44 patients who survived more than 2 years after intestinal transplantation performed between 1994 and 2002. Median age was 1.7 years. Tacrolimus level was defined as average tacrolimus level over 6 months. Kidney function was evaluated using a 6-month average serum creatinine. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated with the Schwartz formula. The procedures were: isolated intestinal transplantation (n = 11), liver and intestinal transplantation (n = 9), multivisceral transplantation (n = 22), and modified multivisceral transplantation (n = 2). Forty-four patients were followed for a mean of 3.6 years on tacrolimus. Tacrolimus levels ranged between 3.5 and 19.9 ng/mL (median 14.6 ng/mL) at 0 to 6 months and 6.0 to 18.9 ng/mL (median 13.2 ng/mL) at 0 to 12 months. Pretransplant kidney function as mean GFR was 138 +/- 42 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 44), posttransplant kidney function at 18 to 24 month as mean GFR was 102+/-35 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 44), a value that was 81% of the pretransplant GFR (P < .0001). In an analysis of tacrolimus level versus renal function, a value greater than 13.5 ng/mL during the first 12 months was a significant predictor for impaired renal function at 2 years after transplantation (defined as average GFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 18 to 24 months; P = .001). Only age among age, sex, diagnosis, transplant type, and rejection episodes showed a correlation with renal function. Renal function dropped significantly at 2 years after pediatric intestinal transplantation to 81% of the pretransplantation value. Tacrolimus level for the first 12 months seemed to predict subsequent development of renal impairment at 2 years.     

Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK 506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants

Background: Only few data exist on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children. Patients: In 1995 and 1996, 14 children (mean age 13 years, range 5-23 years) received tacrolimus after renal transplantation; 10 of these after biopsy-proven steroid-resistant rejection (2 with vascular rejection), two for cyclosporin A (CsA)-induced severe nephrotoxicity, one for untreatable gingival hyperplasia on CsA, and one child was treated primarily after transplantation because of severe liver involvement in nephronophthisis. Pharmacokinetic investigations were performed after establishing a stable maintenance dose with trough levels in the desired window of 5-12 ng/ml. Results: Mean follow-up time was 6 months (range 3-25 months). Eleven patients were still on tacrolimus. Two were discontinued because of severe aggravation of chronic persistent hepatitis C (one of them also developed diabetes mellitus),and one patient was subsequently switched to conventional immunosuppression because of tacrolimus-associated nephrotoxicity. All tacrolimus levels were measured by a modified assay (MEIA, Tacrolimus, Abbott) with improved sensitivity. At the time of switch, median serum creatinine was 234±82 7mgr;mol;l and 6 months after switch 201±99 &mgr;mol/l. All grafts are still functioning. Mean FK-506 dose was 0.16 mg/kg body weight/day (range 0.036-0.30 mg/kg). Mean trough level was 7.1±2.6 ng/ml in the morning and 6.5±2.0 ng/ml in the evening. Median time of maximum concentration (tmax) was 120 min after application, and the mean maximum concentration (Cmax) was 15.2±6.7 ng/ml. Mean area under the curve (AUC) was 104±33 ng * h/ml, with a range from 65 to 169 ng * h/ml. No patient had unsatisfactorily low trough levels during the study. There was only a weak but significant (P<0.05) correlation between dose per kg body weight and AUC and, as expected, an excellent correlation (r²=0.73, P<0.001) between AUC and trough level. Conclusion: Because of interindividual variation between patients, therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is mandatory. In this study, a daily dose of 0.15 mg/kg was sufficient in most patients. We recommend the performance of at least one pharmacokinetic study after establishing stable FK 506 trough levels to ascertain a safe profile.     

Tacrolimus conversion in kidney transplant recipients: analysis of 107 patients

Early results of an alteration in immunosuppressive protocol of tacrolimus conversion at a mean follow-up of 16 (range 1 to 36) months are presented with a mean time after transplantation of 34 +/- 1.4 months (range 1 to 158 months). Chronic allograft nephropathy in 16 (17%) patients, nephrotoxicity related to cyclosporine in 27(23%) patients and steroids resistant acute rejection in 64 (58%) represented the indications for tacrolimus conversion. Before starting tacrolimus there were 1 acute rejection episode in 37 patients, 2 in 17 patients, and 3 in 10 patients. After the drug conversion, 1 acute rejection occurred in 18 and 2 acute rejection in 4 patients. Graft loss was seen in 16 (16%) patients after drug conversion. Tacrolimus was withdrawn due to diabetes mellitus (n = 9), epilepsy (n = 4), and severe Nocardia sepsis, lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma (each in one patient). Decreases in serum creatinine and increases in blood glucose levels were significantly associated with the tacrolimus doses (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0400, respectively). The increase in creatinine clearance values were closely related to higher tacrolimus levels. The target range with maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity seemed to be 10 to 15 ng/mL. Tacrolimus conversion can be successful in cases of rejection and nephrotoxicity, but dose-dependent blood glucose elevations require close observation in these patients.     

Rapamycin in children after liver transplantation

Experience with sirolimus (SRL) in pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) is limited. The aim of the study was to present our experience with SRL in this setting. During the last 2 years we administered SRL to 9 LTx: children in 3 due to chronic rejection and 6 due to impaired renal function. SRL was started at 2 months to 2.5 years after LTx. Target trough levels for tacrolimus for patients with chronic rejection was 8 to 10 ng/mL and SRL 10 to 12 ng/mL; for patients with impaired renal function, 4 to 6 ng/mL and 8 to 10 ng/mL respectively. For patients on only SRL and steroids the target level was 12 to 20 ng/mL. Our observation on SRL varied from 3 to 21 months, including liver function, renal function, and side effects. All patients are alive. In 3 patients with chronic rejection (ChR), follow-up biopsies showed no signs of ChR; they all normalized liver biochemistry. Independent of indication all improved their renal function. Follow-up GFR in 5 patients showed significant improvement in all. All patients showed elevated serum cholesterol values. SRL was discontinued in 3 patients due to elevation of liver enzymes in 1, persistently high serum cholesterol in 1, and repeated bouts of opportunistic infection in 1. Addition of SRL with reduced doses of tacrolimus or switching to SRL alone significantly improves renal function.     

Clinical Challenges of Tacrolimus for Maintenance Immunosuppression Post–Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a successful treatment option for end-stage lung disease, and immunosuppressant regimens, utilized to prevent rejection of the transplanted graft, are paramount to maintaining long-term graft survival. Immunosuppression can be classified as induction, maintenance, and antirejection therapy. This article focuses on maintenance immunosuppression that includes a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), cell cycle inhibitor, and corticosteroid. CNIs remain the cornerstone of immunosuppression following LTx, and tacrolimus is now the preferred CNI, based on a better adverse effect profile and some limited evidence for enhanced efficacy. Tacrolimus is associated with a number of unique challenges post-LTx, with erratic and highly variable absorption making it difficult to achieve and maintain therapeutic levels. Current methods of therapeutic drug monitoring are extrapolated from models in liver and kidney transplants and are not validated in the LTx population. Alternative methods of delivering tacrolimus can address some of the issues associated with their use and can be utilized in particular clinical scenarios. Long-term toxicities attributed to tacrolimus, such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, can limit the long-term success of tacrolimus in preventing allograft rejection. This article emphasizes the current clinical challenges faced when managing LTx recipients with tacrolimus, offers strategies to manage these issues, and highlights the areas that need further research.     

Long-term use of FK 506 in living related liver transplantation

Abstract FK 506 (Tacrolimus) was used with steroids to treat 61 pediatric patients who received living related partial liver transplantation. Fifty-two recipients survived and 9 died between 6 months and 3 years after transplantation. In the surviving patients, oral doses of Tacrolimus were tapered from 0.298 ± 0.277 mg/kg daily at 1 month after transplantation to 0.078 ± 0.054 at 24 months after transplantation. The 12 h trough levels of Tacrolimus were 12.6 ± 7.1 ng/ml and 4.1 ± 2.4 at 1 and 24 months after transplantation, respectively. The percentage of recipients free from steroids was 77%, 97%, and 94% at 6, 12, and 24 months after transplantation, respectively. Liver allograft rejection was encountered in seven recipients, five of whom were treated by steroid pulse therapy and a dose increase of Tacrolimus; the remaining two required OKT3. However, there was no episode of rejection that required retransplantation. Infectious complications encountered in 34 patients included 12 bacterial, 3 fungal, and 19 viral infections. Two recipients died one of fungal pneumonia and one of Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disorder. Regarding adverse reactions of Tacrolimus, hypertension was observed in 28 patients, diabetes mellitus in 3, pancreatitis in 3, convulsion in 1, tremor in 12, itching in 5, and pigmentation in the oral mucosa in 2. Slightly increased values of creatinine were observed in most of the patients; however, an abnormal increase of serum of serum creatinine (> 1.0 mg/dl) was confined to the complicated cases. Improvement of somatic growth was observed in 21 patients (62%) and 13 (75%) at 12 and 24 months after transplantation, respectively. The long-term use of Tacrolimus is highly effective in terms of its immunosuppressive potential and reduced adverse reaction. Steady growth development can be expected in pediatric recipients free from steroids.     

Primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus: more than 90 months actual follow-up survival and adverse events.

The introduction of tacrolimus has shown decreased rates of acute and steroid-resistant rejection after liver transplantation (LTx). The aim of the present study is to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in primary liver transplant recipients. The first 121 consecutive adults (aged >16 years) who underwent primary LTx at a single center from August 1989 to February 1990 were followed up until August 1997. The mean follow-up was 93.2 +/- 1.2 months (range, 90.5 to 96.5 months). Patient survival, graft survival, rate of rejection, and adverse events were examined. The actual 7-year patient survival rate was 67.8%, and the graft survival rate was 63.6%. Infections, recurrence of disease, de novo malignancies, and cardiovascular events constituted the main causes of graft loss and death in the long term. Graft loss related to acute or chronic rejection was rare. The rate of acute rejection beyond 2 years was approximately 3% per year, and most rejections were steroid responsive. Approximately 70% of the patients received only tacrolimus after 1 year. Four patients developed end-stage renal disease, and 2 patients underwent kidney transplantation. Hyperkalemia and hypertension were observed in one third of the patients. New-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was observed in 9% and 13% of the patients at the 1-year and 7-year follow-up, respectively. Seven patients developed de novo malignancies, including two skin malignancies. Six patients developed posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder during the entire follow-up period. Actual patient and graft survival at 7 years was excellent, and few adverse events developed after the first year. Graft loss from acute or chronic rejection was rare under tacrolimus, and approximately 70% of the patients were steroid free on tacrolimus monotherapy after the first year after LTx.     

Daclizumab induction therapy associated with tacrolimus-MMF has better outcome compared with tacrolimus-MMF alone in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

AIMS: Immunosuppression therapy for the control of immunologic rejection is a key aspect in liver transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate induction therapy with daclizumab (DAC) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. METHODS: We compared 2 different immunosuppression protocols in 30 children undergoing LDLT. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 12 patients received tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (TAC-MMF), and 18 patients received tacrolimus with MMF and DAC induction therapy at days 0 and 14 after LDLT (DAC-TAC-MMF). Both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, weight, and indication for liver transplantation. The incidence of biopsy-proved rejection episodes, posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and renal dysfunction were evaluated. Tacrolimus levels at posttransplantation day 14 and at 2 months after transplantation were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes were observed in 8 patients in the TAC-MMF group (66%), and none in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (0%; P < .05). Neither PTLD nor renal dysfunction was seen in any patient. Mean Tacrolimus level on posttransplantation day 14 was 10.67 +/- 5.4 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF group and 5.65 +/- 3.6 ng/mL in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (P < .05). After the second month the mean tacrolimus levels were 7.2 +/- 2.9 ng/mL and 6.8 +/- 3.5 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF and DAC-TAC-MMF groups, respectively. (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy with DAC is safe and associated with a lower incidence of rejection episodes among children undergoing LDLT.     

Efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with steroid-resistant cardiac allograft cellular rejection.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is gaining widespread use in solid organ transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus in treating steroid-resistant cellular myocardial rejection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of rejection and clinical outcome of 21 heart transplant recipients who were electively converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for recurrent episodes of steroid-resistant cellular rejection. These were compared to a historic group of 6 hemodynamically stable patients who were treated electively with Orthoclone OKT3 (Muromonab/CD3) for recurrent rejection. RESULTS: Eighty five percent (56/66) of the episodes of rejection occurred within the first 3 months after heart transplantation. Tacrolimus was started 2. 4 +/- 2.0 months post-transplant, and the mean follow-up duration on tacrolimus was 11.0 +/- 7.0 months. After conversion, a significant decline was noted in both the number of episodes of acute rejection per patient (3.14 +/- 0.85-0.57 +/- 0.87, p < 0.0001), and the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (6.39 +/- 3.96-0. 25 +/- 0.47, p < 0.0001). In comparison, OKT3 was started 5.25 +/- 9. 20 months post-transplant. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (8. 69 +/- 5.65-0.20 +/- 0.23, p < 0.0001). The average hospital charges per patient for the OKT3-treated group was $33,339 +/- $10,511. There was no significant difference in the actuarial 1-year survival between the tacrolimus and OKT3-treated groups (93% vs 80%, p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient conversion to tacrolimus is safe, well tolerated, and an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of steroid-resistant cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients. It is more cost-effective than OKT3 in the hemodynamically stable patient and outcomes are similar.     

Altered metabolism of tacrolimus in hepatic veno-occlusive disease

Tacrolimus is widely used for the prophylaxis and treatment of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and graft rejection in solid organ transplantation. The metabolism of tacrolimus has been reported to be impaired in association with liver dysfunction, mostly as documented in liver transplant recipients. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is one of the serious complications after allogeneic HSCT. It is characterized by jaundice, fluid retention, and painful hepatomegaly, caused by endothelial cell injury resulting from the toxicity of the conditioning regimen. The impaired metabolism of tacrolimus in hepatic VOD has not previously been reported in the literature. Here, we report the notable alteration in the metabolism of tacrolimus in two patients with hepatic VOD, in whom the half-lives of tacrolimus were markedly prolonged (288 and 146 h).     

Safety of Conversion From Twice-Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf) to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus (Advagraf) in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients

Nonadherence to immunosuppressive regimens among solid organ transplantation to range has been estimated from 15% to 55%. This problem has been identified as a leading cause of preventable graft loss. Tacrolimus once daily Advagraf has been developed to provide a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to Advagraf in 36 stable liver transplant recipients. The tacrolimus whole blood trough level at T0 was 6.7 ± 2.9 ng/mL with a daily dose of 3.7 ± 1.8 mg. The mean tacrolimus blood trough levels at T1 (7 days) and T2 (14 days) were 5.8 ± 2.5 and 5.8 ± 1.8 ng/mL with mean daily doses of 3.9 ± 1.9 and 4.1 ± 1.8 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference between T0, T1, and T2, either for tacrolimus blood trough levels or for tacrolimus daily dosages. Liver and renal function tests remained stable; no episodes of acute rejection were encountered after the conversion. A switching policy using a dose ratio of 1:1 from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus was safely applied to stable liver transplant recipients.     

Tacrolimus for steroiD-resistant liver rejection in children

Abstract Eighteen pediatric liver transplant recipients were converted from cyclosporine-based immunosuppression to tacrolimus for refractory rejection episodes affecting 21 grafts. Before conversion, steroid boluses were applied to all episodes followed by OKT3 monoclonal antibodies in 3 of them. Baseline biopsy showed cellular rejection in 18 patients and ductopenia in 3 cases. Thirteen episodes initiated within the first 2 postoperative weeks, and 8 occurred beyond the 21st day. A previous steroiD-responsive episode of rejection was noted in 4 patients. Tacrolimus was administered by the oral route to obtain trough blood levels in the range 6–15 ng/ml. Reversal of rejection was obtained in 15 patients (71.4%). Complete normalization of liver function tests was achieved in 10 out of 12 patients who were followed for more than 6 months. A refractory evolution affected 6 patients (28.5 %). Significant factors predictive for tacrolimus-resistant rejection were identified as ductopenia on baseline biopsy, previous episodes of acute rejection, late onset rejection (beyond 21st posttransplant (day), and a longer time of evolution of rejection prior to conversion.     

Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal failure in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C viral infection

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal failure after successful liver transplantation (LTx) has been described in up to 5% of patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) has been the treatment of choice in these cases. However, in recipients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), the augmentation of immunosuppression after KTx may result in an increased viral load. This, in turn, may adversely affect the liver allograft. METHOD: The present study retrospectively examined the outcome in 17 patients (3 females and 14 males, mean age 51.1+/-11.3 years) who received KTx after LTx. The mean interval from LTx to KTx was 57.6+/-32.1 months. The mean follow-up was 41.7+/-20.5 months after KTx, and 99.6+/-37.7 months after LTx. Sixteen of the 17 patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression at the time of KTx. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, one patient underwent combined liver and kidney retransplantation 3.7 years after KTx and 12.7 years after LTx. She subsequently died secondary to primary nonfunction. Four other patients died, two of lung cancer, one of pancreatitis/sepsis, and one of severe depression leading to noncompliance. A total of 29 episodes of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection (1.7 episodes/ patient) were encountered and treated with steroids. Seven patients experienced a rise in liver function tests during the period of increased steroid dosage. Four patients received no treatment, and their liver function returned to baseline. The remaining three were treated with interferon. Overall 1- and 3-year actuarial patient and liver allograft survival was 88% and 71% (after renal transplantation); corresponding 1- and 3-year actuarial graft survival was 88% and 61%. Twelve patients are alive with normal liver function. One patient is on dialysis, because of renal allograft loss to noncompliance. CONCLUSION: In this series, LTx recipients with HCV infection were able to undergo KTx with a reasonable degree of success. KTx should be offered for end-stage renal failure after LTx, even in the presence of HCV infection, to individuals with stable liver function and no signs of liver failure.