Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management

Purpose

For many years, the impact of the surgeon volume on short- and long-term outcome after rectal carcinoma surgery is controversially discussed. Literature and own department data were reviewed in order to clarify the impact of surgeon volume in the current era of total mesorectal excision surgery, multimodal therapy, quality management, and centralization of cancer care.

Methods

Uni- and multivariate analysis of data from 1,028 patients with solitary rectal carcinoma, treated between 1995 and 2010 at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany, was performed. Surgeons were subdivided according to the number of operations/year into high- (at least seven/year), medium- (three to six), and low- (less than three) volume surgeons.

Results

Of 1,028 patients, 800 (77.8 %) were operated by five high-volume surgeons, 193 (18.8 %) by seven medium-volume surgeons, and 35 (3.4 %) by 12 low-volume surgeons. Surgeon volume was significantly associated with postoperative mortality and the rate of positive pathological circumferential resection margin. In risk-adjusted analysis, after primary surgery, surgeon volume had a significant impact on observed overall survival and disease-free survival, but not on locoregional recurrence. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, only observed overall survival was significantly influenced by surgeon volume.

Conclusions

In surgical departments with special interest in rectal carcinoma, surgeon volume has some influence on short- and long-term outcome. Irrespective of this fact, specialization, experience, individual skill, hospital organization, and regular quality assurance are essential prognostic factors ensuring good results in rectal carcinoma surgery.     

A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer--implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit

INTRODUCTION: Rectal cancer surgery has been characterized by a high incidence of local recurrence, an occurrence which influences survival negatively. In Norway there was a growing recognition that local recurrence rates were related to surgeon performance and that surgeons applying a standardized surgical technique in the form of total mesorectal excision could achieve better results. This contrasts with the prevailing argument voiced by many opinion leaders that local recurrence rates and possibly survival rates can only be improved by adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment strategies. The Norwegian Rectal Cancer Project—initiated in 1993—aimed at improving the outcome of patients with rectal cancer by implementing total mesorectal excision as the standard rectal resection technique. METHODS: This observational national cohort study covers all new patients (3,319) with rectal cancer from a population of 4.5 million treated between November 1993 and August 1997. The main outcome measures were local recurrence, survival, and postoperative mortality and morbidity rates. The technique of total mesorectal excision was compared with conventional surgery. RESULTS: The proportion of patients undergoing total mesorectal excision was 78 percent in 1994, increasing to 92 percent in 1997. The observed local recurrence rate for patients undergoing a curative resection was 6 percent in the group treated by total mesorectal excision and 12 percent in the conventional surgery group. Four-year survival rate was 73 percent after total mesorectal excision and 60 percent after conventional surgery. Postoperative mortality rate was 3 percent and the anastomotic dehiscence rate was 10 percent. Radiotherapy was given to 5 percent and chemotherapy to 3 percent of the patients in the curative resection group. CONCLUSION: A refinement of the surgical resection technique for rectal cancer can be achieved on a national level, the technique of total mesorectal excision can be widely distributed, and surgery alone can give good results.     

Local recurrence and survival rates after extended systematic lymph-node dissection for surgical treatment of rectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Extended systematic lymph-node dissection (ESLND) is a surgical procedure aimed at decreasing the local recurrence rate of rectal cancer and increasing the survival rate. However, it is criticized because it has not shown the expected effects on survival, and it has been shown to increase the proportion of complications in rectal cancer surgery. This study was designed to determine incidence and patterns of recurrence after curative resection with or without ESLND for rectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: A total of 184 patients with rectal cancer were reviewed with respect to surgical procedures, local recurrence and survival rates. RESULTS: 170 of 184 patients with rectal cancer were administered curative surgical resection. ESLND was added to the surgical procedure of 24 of these 170 patients. The local recurrence rate of the patients who did not receive lymph-node dissection was 15%, and the survival rate over 5 years was 58.9%. The local recurrence rate of the patients receiving ESLND was 12.5%, and the survival rate over 5 years was found to be 55.7% (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Because ESLND is a procedure added on to curative resection in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, it increases the general anesthesia and length of surgery, and it is possible that some complications due to the operation itself may arise. In the current study and in a large amount of research in the literature, a statistically significant effect on the survival rate has not been found. In conclusion, the opinion has been reached that ESLND does not have an important benefit in the curative surgical treatment of rectal cancer.     

Rectal excision and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer

PURPOSE: Preservation of the anal sphincter is now accepted as a primary aim in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. The use of colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis after complete rectal excision is one method that permits retention of continence without compromising oncologic principles. This study aimed to assess carcinologic results of rectal excision followed by colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis, with particular reference to rate of locoregional recurrence. METHOD: From 1984 to 1990 complete rectal excision and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis were performed in 167 patients for cancer of the middle or low rectum. A total of 154 patients were followed for this study for a minimum of five years, with evaluation of the frequency of locoregional recurrence. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients died during the period of surveillance, giving a five-year survival rate of 68.8 percent. Twenty patients (13 percent) presented with locoregional recurrence at an average of 31 months after surgery. In 11 cases (7 percent) the local recurrence was not associated with metastatic disease, and six of these patients underwent further curative surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that coloanal anastomosis after complete rectal excision is a valuable option in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer and is accompanied by a frequency of isolated locoregional recurrence of less than 7 percent, of which half underwent surgical resection with curative intent.Presented at Journées Francophones de Pathologie Digestive, Lille, France, March 23 to 27, 1996.     

Outcome of total pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Local recurrence occurs in 10 to 30% of patients with rectal cancer following curative resection. However treatment of choice remains controversial. We assessed the results of total pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent cancer of the rectum retrospectively. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed medical charts of 45 patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative total pelvic exenteration for local recurrence. The cause of recurrence was classified into four groups: anastomotic, surgical cut-end, implantation, and lymphatic based on pathologic findings and computed tomography. Long-term survival was correlated with clinicopathologic variables. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity was 77.8% and in-hospital death occurred in 13.3% of patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 14.1%. The 5-year survival rates stratified according to the expectation of curability were 31.6% for absolutely curative resection, 7.8% for relatively curative resection, and 0% for non-curative resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that the disease-free interval was the only independent prognostic factor. There was no benefit from perioperative radiation or intraoperative continuous pelvic peritoneal perfusion of the pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: Total pelvic exenteration for local recurrence of rectal cancer can achieve long-term survival when curative resection is possible and the disease-free interval is long.     

Abdominosacral resection of recurrent rectal cancer in the sacrum

PURPOSE: Resection of the sacrum is the only curative therapy of isolated sacral recurrence after primarily resected rectal cancer. The aim of the study was to assess whether there is a benefit in terms of overall survival, morbidity, and mortality when sacrum resection is performed more radically and in cooperation between colorectal and orthopedic surgeons. Possible prognostic factors were also assessed. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients who underwent interdisciplinary partial sacral resection were included in a retrospective cohort study. Furthermore, overall survival rate and survival time were calculated. RESULTS: Histologic examination showed tumor-free resection margins in all cases. Extended resection was necessary in seven patients, including total pelvic exenteration in two. No perioperative death occurred and no patient required early reoperation. Complications were observed in 42 percent of patients, mainly caused by poor wound healing. All patients experienced relief from pain. One-year and three-year overall survival rates were 50 and 17 percent, respectively. The overall mean survival time was 21.7 months. Patients who died of recurrent disease within one year either underwent former resection for locoregional recurrence, had extensive local recurrent tumors affecting pelvic visceral structures, or retrospectively suffered from metastatic sacral tumor manifestation. CONCLUSION: The mortality and morbidity rates observed in the present study seem to justify partial sacral resection as a means to achieve palliation of perineosacral pain in spite of rare overall long-term survival.     

Surgery for local recurrence of rectal carcinoma

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate results, especially mortality and morbidity, of surgical resection with curative intent for patients with a local recurrence of rectal cancer, in combination with radiotherapy. METHODS: Consecutive medical records of 163 patients with local recurrence of rectal carcinoma after previous “curative” therapy for primary rectal cancer were reviewed. Although 35 patients had an exploratory laparotomy, only 27 had local recurrence amendable to resection (6 irresectable locoregional recurrences and 2 distant metastases found at laparotomy). Twenty-one patients received radiotherapy. There was no perioperative mortality. Median follow-up time was 42 (range, 22–92) months. RESULTS: Local rerecurrence occurred in 16 (59 percent) patients. Ten patients are alive, of whom nine have good local control. Estimated five-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) is 20 percent. Survival was significantly better in patients without a second recurrence, but radicality of the resection was not influential. Good local control could be obtained in 12 (44 percent) patients, and 1 patient is living with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with local recurrence of rectal carcinoma, reoperation with irradiation may result in good palliation and possibly cure.     

Stratifying risk factors for follow-up

INTRODUCTION: The selection of patients for individualized follow-up and adjuvant therapy after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma depends on finding reliable prognostic criteria for recurrence. However, such criteria are not universally accepted, and follow-up is often standardized for all patients without regard for each individual's level of risk of recurrence. Such a system of follow-up is not cost-effective. METHODS: A comparison of operative findings, pathologic features, and follow-up data of 1,731 cases of nonrecurrent colorectal cancer (821 colon, 910 rectum) with 357 cases of recurrent colorectal cancer (164 colon, 193 rectum) following potentially curative surgery was made, and results were analyzed to ascertain criteria for stratifying follow-up according to risk factors. RESULTS: Single-factor analysis showed that Dukes staging and tumor invasion were significantly associated with recurrence in both rectal and colon carcinoma. Tumor fixation and grading were additional significant factors in rectal cancer. Recurrence rates, time to recurrence, site of recurrence (locoregionalvs. distant), and pattern of metastatic spread were not significantly affected by original tumor site. Recurrence was not significantly affected by patient age and gender. Individual surgeon performance in this series had also no significant effects on tumor recurrence. With multivariate analysis only, Dukes staging and tumor invasion into adjacent tissues were found to be independent adverse prognostic factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Dukes staging and tumor penetration into adjacent tissues are the only significant adverse prognostic factors for tumor recurrence of colonic and rectal carcinoma. Tumor grade and tumor fixation are additional adverse prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Guidelines for follow-up may be based on these factors and follow-up thus stratified according to risk of developing recurrence.     

Lung recurrence after curative surgery for colorectal cancer

A total of 1578 patients were treated with potentially curative surgical resection for colon and rectal cancer by one surgeon from 1950 to 1982. Follow-up revealed that 117 (11,5 percent) of 1013 patients with rectal carcinoma eventually presented with clinical evidence of pulmonary recurrence, with or without evidence of spread elsewhere; the corresponding figures for the colon were 20 (3.5 percent) of 565 (P<0.001). An analysis of the times to recurrence revealed that half of the lung recurrence, were clinically obvious within 32 months for rectal tumors and 34 months for colonic, compared to 22 and 21 months, respectively, for liver recurrences, excluding those with other distant metastases. The slower recurrence rate and the longer survival in patients with recurrences in the lung compared to the liver were statistically significant only for rectal primaties (P<0.02 andP=0.001, respectively). Sixteen patients underwent surgeery with curative intention for lung recurrences; four of these remain alive at two, six, 11, and 15 years, and one patient was free of recurrence when he died from other causes 15 months after surgery. The conditional probability survival rate for the 16 patients was 38±13 percent at five years after recurrence operation.     

Patterns and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer following multidisciplinary treatment

AIM: To investigate the patterns and decisive prognostic factors for local recurrence of rectal cancer treated with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) modality.METHODS: Ninety patients with local recurrence were studied, out of 1079 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery from 1999 to 2007. For each patient, the recurrence pattern was assessed by specialist radiologists from the MDT using imaging, and the treatment strategy was decided after discussion by the MDT. The associations between clinicopathological factors and long-term outcomes were evaluated using both univariate and multivariate analysis.RESULTS: The recurrence pattern was classified as follows: Twenty-seven (30%) recurrent tumors were evaluated as axial type, 21 (23.3%) were anterior type, 8 (8.9%) were posterior type, and 13 (25.6%) were lateral type. Forty-one patients had tumors that were evaluated as resectable by the MDT and ultimately received surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in 36 (87.8%) of these patients. The recurrence pattern was closely associated with resectability and R0 resection rate (P < 0.001). The recurrence pattern, interval to recurrence, and R0 resection were significantly associated with 5-year survival rate in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that the R0 resection was the unique independent factor affecting long-term survival.CONCLUSION: The MDT modality improves patient selection for surgery by enabling accurate classification of the recurrence pattern; R0 resection is the most significant factor affecting long-term survival.     

Risk factors of long-term survival and recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The independent risk factors contributing to long-term survival (> or = 10-year survival rate) and recurrence after curative hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were evaluated. METHODOLOGY: The prognoses were retrospectively analyzed in 247 consecutive patients (187 men and 60 women) treated with curative hepatic resection for HCC and discharged from the hospital. Prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that pTNM stage IV, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (ICGR15) of > or = 20%, tumor size of > or = 5 cm, and positive hepatitis B surface antigen were independent risk factors of overall survival. Stage IV and ICGR15 of > or = 20% were also independent risk factors of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: pTNM stage and ICGR15 may be simple and useful predictors to improve long-term survival and recurrence after curative hepatic resection for HCC.     

Treatment of locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

In order to analyze the results of treatment of patients with locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer, a retrospective study was performed. During the period 1978-1988, 108 patients underwent an intentional curative resection fo the pancreas. In 34 patients locoregional recurrence occurred, all within a period of three years (cumulative recurrence rate 56%). Sixty-eight percent of the patients presented with upper abdominal pain, and 62% with weight loss. Survival was significantly better (p = 0.02) in the group of 18 patients without distant metastases (1-year survival 22%) than in the 16 patients with distant metastases (1-year survival 0%). Five patients without proven distant metastases were treated by resection or chemotherapy. The mean survival was 33 months (range 6-74) in the treated group, and 4 months (0.4-7 months) in the untreated group, p = 0.002. In this retrospective study the longest survival was seen after radical resection of locoregional tumor recurrence. We therefore recommend that patients with locoregional recurrence without distant metastases after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer be treated.     

Local recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision

PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to examine local recurrence after curative resection for carcinoma of the rectum in which the surgical technique of total mesorectal excision was not performed. METHODS: A single surgeon managed the patients and the data collected prospectively. Total excision of the distal mesorectum was not performed in the upper third or mid rectum. RESULTS: From 1969 to 1993 curative resections were performed in 549 patients, of which 17 died postoperatively, leaving 532 for analysis. Sphincter-saving resection was performed in 468 patients (88 percent) and abdominoperineal excision in 58 (10.9 percent). The pathology stages (Dukes) were A, 158 (29.7 percent); B, 184 (34.7 percent); and C, 190 (35.7 percent). Five hundred seventeen patients (97.2 percent) were followed up for a minimum of five years. The median period of follow-up was 82 months. Local recurrence confined to the pelvis occurred in 17 patients, and local recurrence associated with distant metastases occurred in 24 patients. The total five-year local recurrence rate was 7.6 percent. Local recurrence was increased in Stage C tumors (P=<0.0001). Diathermy dissection in the pelvis was associated with a decreased local recurrence rate (P=0.023). The five-year survival rate in curative resections was 72.5 percent. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential that articles presenting local recurrence rates should include both local recurrence in isolation and that which occurs with distant metastases. Although total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer was not performed in this study, the local recurrence rate is not materially different from that in several articles where total mesorectal excision has been used. Whether the distal mesorectum needs to be pursued in mid-rectal cancer is not yet proven.     

Hypogastric nerve preservation does not increase local recurrence after surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The main aim of the study was to evaluate whether superior hypogastric plexus and hypogastric nerve can be preserved without increasing local recurrence while performing surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective study of 129 patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent curative resection with two types of autonomic nerve-sparing operation. The superior hypogastric plexus and bilateral hypogastric nerves were resected in 61 patients and spared in 68 patients. The pelvic plexus was preserved in all the patients. Local recurrence and survival were compared between two operations. RESULTS: After three years, local recurrence cumulative rates were 13.1% after hypogastric nerve removing operation and 10.3% after hypogastric nerve preserving operation. Distant metastasis and corrected 5-year survival rates were 23.0 and 61.6%, respectively after hypogastric nerve-removing operation, while after hypogastric nerve-preserving operation those were 16.2 and 77.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hypogastric nerve-preserving operation does not appear to carry an increased risk of local recurrence compared with hypogastric nerve-removing operation after an equivalent follow-up period.     

Selective total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision has been advocated for rectal cancer, but its use in upper rectal and rectosigmoid tumors remains a point of debate. METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients with rectal cancers were subjected to a prospective policy of total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancers and a wide (5 cm) distal margin mesorectal excision for upper rectal and rectosigmoid cancers. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent ultralow anterior resection, 10 underwent abdominoperineal excision, 64 had anterior resection and 2 had Hartmann's procedure. The median follow-up was 39 months. Forty-three patients had a defunctioning ileostomy. Three patients (7.3 percent) had anastomotic leaks after ultralow anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Ninety-three patients had palliative resections. There were four locoregional recurrences in this group, giving an actuarial locoregional recurrence rate of 9.3 percent at five years. The actuarial locoregional recurrence rate after anterior resection was 6.5 percent at five years. The actuarial five-year cancer-specific survival rate was 81.4 percent at five years. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that a policy of wide excision of the mesorectum for upper rectal and rectosigmoid cancer and total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer is associated with a low locoregional recurrence rate and may be as efficacious as routine total mesorectal excision for all rectal cancers.     

Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer

PURPOSE: Jeopardizing cure and risking high local recurrence have served as arguments against sphincter-saving resection for patients with distal third rectal cancer. This prospective study examines and compares the local recurrence and survival rates in patients with distal third rectal cancer treated by either coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: Between 1977 and 1993, 174 patients underwent coloanal anastomoses and 38 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection. All tumors were located 4 to 7 cm from the anal verge. One hundred ninety-three patients (91 percent) underwent rectal excision with a curative intent. Mean follow-up was 66 months after sphincter-saving resection and 65 months after abdominoperineal resection. RESULTS: Mean anastomotic height from the anal verge was 2.3 cm after sphincter-saving resection. Overall local recurrence rate was 7.9 percent after sphincter-saving resection and 12.9 percent after abdominoperineal resection. The five-year actuarial survival rate was 78 percent after sphincter-saving resection and 74 percent after abdominoperineal resection. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence and survival are not compromised in patients with distal third rectal cancer when treated by sphincter-saving resection, provided that oncologic principles are not violated. Coloanal anastomosis can be performed with an acceptable morbidity.     

Risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection

AIM： To explore the risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection. METHODS： Specimens of middle and lower rectal carcinoma from 56 patients who received curative resection at the Department of General Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People＇s Hospital were studied. A large slice technique was used to detect mesorectal metastasis and evaluate circumferential resection margin status. The relations between clinicopathologic characteristics, mesorectal metastasis and circumferential resection margin status were identified in patients with local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma. RESULTS： Local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection occurred in 7 of the 56 patients （12.5%）, and was significantly associated with family history （Х^2= 3.929, P = 0.047）, high CEA level （Х^2 = 4.964, P = 0.026）, cancerous perforation （Х^2 = 8.503, P = 0.004）, tumor differentiation （Х^2 = 9.315, P = 0.009） and vessel cancerous emboli （Х^2 = 11.879, P = 0.001）. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between local recurrence of rectal carcinoma and other variables such as age （Х^2 = 0.506, P = 0.477）, gender （Х^2 = 0.102, Z2 = 0.749）, tumor diameter （Х^2 = 0.421, P = 0.516）,tumor infiltration （Х^2 = 5.052, P = 0.168）, depth of tumor invasion （Х^2 = 4.588, P = 0.101）, lymph node metastases （Х^2 = 3.688, P = 0.055） and TNM staging system （Х^2 = 3.765, P = 0.152）. The local recurrence rate of middle and lower rectal carcinoma was 33.3% （4/12） in patients with positive circumferential resection margin and 6.8% （3/44） in those with negative circumferential resection margin. There was a significant difference between the two groups （Х^2 = 6.061, P = 0.014）. Local recurrence of rectal carcinoma occurred in 6 of 36 patients （16.7%） with mesorectal metastasis, and in 1 of 20 patients （5.0%） without mesorectal metastasis. However, there was no significant     

Surgery and chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma, arising from bile duct epithelium, is categorized into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), including hilarcholangiocarcinoma. Recently, there has been a worldwide increase in the incidence and mortality from ICC. Complete surgical resection is the only approach to cure the patients with ICC. However, locoregional extension of these tumors is usually advanced with intrahepatic and lymph-node metastases at the time of diagnosis. Resectability rates are quite low and variable (18%-70%). The five-year survival rate after surgical resection was reported to be 20%-40%. Median survival time after ICC resection was 12-37.4 mo. Only a small number of ICC cases, accompanied with ECC, gall bladder carcinoma, and ampullary carcinoma, have been reported in the studies of chemotherapy due to the rarity of the disease. However, in some reports, significant anti-cancer effects were achieved with a response rate of up to 40% and a median survival of one year. Although recurrence rate after hepatectomy is high for the patients with ICC, the residual liver and the lung are the main sites of recurrence after tentative curative surgical resection. Several patients in our study had a long-term survival with repeated surgery and chemotherapy. Repeated surgery, combined with new effective regimens of chemotherapy, could benefit the survival of ICC patients.     

Accompanying liver cirrhosis as a risk factor for recurrence after resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A high recurrence rate after hepatic resection adversely influences the postoperative prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In the present study, long-term results and prognostic factors were evaluated in patients who underwent hepatic resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: The records of 105 patients who underwent hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between June 1978 and April 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. In 61 patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma who survived the curative operation, the prognostic significance of 11 clinicopathological parameters was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: After curative resection, the cumulative survival rate at 5 years in these 61 patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma was significantly better than in 25 patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.01). However, even in the solitary group, the cumulative recurrence-free survival rate at 5 years was only 32%; and in 27 (75%) of 36 patients, in whom recurrence was confirmed within 5 years, hepatocellular carcinoma recurred within 2 years. Multivariate analysis disclosed that only accompanying liver cirrhosis was a variable having prognostic significance for overall and recurrence-free survival. A study of other clinicopathological factors, including tumor size, failed to demonstrate any prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS: The present result suggests that hepatic resection can be indicated in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma, irrespective of its size. Though the postoperative recurrence associated with the underlying cirrhosis is still frequent, long-term survival can be expected if the recurrent tumors are successfully treated by a strategy using multiple modalities.     

Randomized controlled trial to compare the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Adjuvant locoregional chemotherapy has been shown to be useful to prevent recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in some retrospective studies. Our aim was to compare the dose effect in the prevention of tumor recurrence. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with curative resection of HCC; they were given either one intra-arterial dose of cisplatin/lipiodol, or received four doses, once every 3 months. The rates of recurrence, disease-free and overall survival were compared. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 818 days, 21 patients received one dose and 19 received four doses, with 10 (47.6%) and eight (42.1%) recurrences, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 71%, 54% and 44% for the one-dose group and 74%, 60% and 40% for the four-dose group (P = 0.78). The respective overall survival rates were 85%, 74%, 55% and 84%, 71%, 40% (P = 0.64). The only prognostic factor was presence of vascular permeation. The side-effects were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be useful.