Efficacy and safety of the laryngeal mask airwayvs Guedel airway following tracheal extubation

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with the Guedel airway during the recovery period. METHODS: In a prospective randomised trial in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), 52 patients (ASA 1 and 2) were randomised to receive either a laryngeal mask airway (LMA: n = 26) or a Guedel airway (n = 26) during the recovery period after middle ear surgery. Ease of airway maintenance was graded and the presence of coughing was noted. Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured continuously by pulse oximetry in the PACU. Readings were taken on arrival (time 0) and for five minutes afterwards. RESULTS: There was no difference in sex, age, weight or incidence of smoking between the two groups. In the LMA group 25 patients required no airway manipulation and only one patient required repositioning of the LMA. In the Guedel group severe difficulty maintaining the airway was experienced in two patients, moderate difficulty in five patients and mild difficulty in 12 patients. Seven patients required no airway manipulation. The LMA group showed higher ease of airway maintenance scores, (P = < 0.0001) and less coughing (P = 0.0496). At time 0 and at one minute the LMA group had higher median SpO2 (97% and 97%) than the Guedel group (95% and 96%), (P = 0.0002 and 0.0362). There was no further difference in SpO2. CONCLUSIONS: The LMA provides easier airway maintenance, less coughing and initially higher median SpO2 when compared with the Guedel airway in the recovery period.     

The site of airway irritation during induction of anaesthesia

The aim of this investigation was to study the role of the nasal airway in mediating upper airway reflexes during induction of anaesthesia when the commonly used irritant inhalational anaesthetic agent enflurane is used. In a prospective randomised study, 40 ASA 1 & 2 day-case patients undergoing body surface surgery were recruited. Following intravenous induction using propofol, 20 patients received enflurane administered via a laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the anaesthetic vapour therefore bypassing the nasal airway. In the other group, 20 patients received enflurane anaesthesia administered using a face mask, the nasal airway therefore being exposed to inhalation anaesthetic. We were unable to demonstrate any significant (p < 0.05) differences between the two groups in relation to upper airway complications (cough, breath holding, laryngeal spasm, bronchospasm and excitement). Previous work has identified the nose as a possible important reflexogenic site for upper airway reflexes in humans during anaesthesia. We have been unable to demonstrate any difference in upper airway complications when the nasal airway was included or excluded from exposure to irritant anaesthetic vapours, when administered in a clinical setting.     

COMPARISON OF THE REINFORCED LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION FOR ADENOTONSILLECTOMY

One hundred and four patients were allocated randomly to receiveanaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy via either a reinforced laryngealmask airway or a tracheal tube. Airway maintenance and protectionwere assessed during and after operation. The reinforced laryngealmask did not interfere with surgical access; it resisted compressionand protected the lower airway from contamination with blood.Four patients were withdrawn from the laryngeal mask airwaygroup: two because of difficulty with placement, and two becausethe laryngeal mask was obstructed distally when the Boyle Davisgag was opened fully. In children, recovery was less eventfulin the laryngeal mask airway group, with less airway obstruction(P < 0.001) and better airway acceptance (P < 0.05). Thereinforced laryngeal mask airway provided a clear, secure airwayuntil recovery of protective reflexes. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993;70: 30–33)     

A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ with the laryngeal mask airway Unique™ in children

We conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme^? with the laryngeal mask airway Unique^? in children. Fifty children presenting for elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive either the laryngeal mask airway Supreme or laryngeal mask airway Unique. The outcomes measured were airway leak pressure, ease and time for insertion, insertion success rate, fibreoptic examination, incidence of gastric insufflation, ease of gastric tube placement through the laryngeal mask airway Supreme, quality of airway during anaesthetic maintenance and complications. Median (IQR [range]) time to successful device placement was shorter with the laryngeal mask airway Unique, 14.5 [13.5–16.3 (10.0–23.6)] s than with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme, 17.4 [14.8–19.8 (11.5–29.2)] s; p = 0.007. Median (IQR [range]) airway leak pressures for the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Unique were 20 [16–21 (12–22)] cmH₂O and 15 [14–18 (10–24)] cmH₂O, respectively (p = 0.001). The incidence of gastric insufflation was lower with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme (zero vs six patients), p = 0.01. In conclusion, the laryngeal mask airway Supreme performed as well as the laryngeal mask airway Unique and is a useful alternative for airway maintenance, particularly in children who require evacuation of gastric contents during anaesthesia.     

Cardiovascular response to insertion of Brain''s laryngeal mask

This study was designed to investigate the cardiovascular effects related to insertion of the Brain laryngeal mask airway and to compare these effects with those after insertion of a Guedel oral airway. Arterial pressure and heart rate in 100 patients were measured using an Ohmeda 2300 Finapres arterial pressure monitor. Arterial pressure decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) and heart rate increased significantly (p less than 0.001) after induction of anaesthesia with 2.5 mg/kg of propofol. A significant increase in arterial pressure (p less than 0.02) and in heart rate (p less than 0.001) followed insertion of the laryngeal mask and the Guedel airway, with no difference between the two groups at any time. The changes in arterial pressure and heart rate returned to 'at insertion' levels within 60 seconds of the stimulus.     

Laryngeal mask bite blocks - rolled gauze versus Guedel airway

Background: Biting on the silicone tube and pilot balloon of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) may obstruct or damage them with the teeth and a bite block is recommended. The recommended bite block is a wad of gauze swabs rolled into a cylindrical shape and placed alongside the LMA. It is considered that this avoids irritating the posterior pharyngeal wall and damage to teeth whilst supporting the LMA tube when taped to it. The Guedel airway is commonly used as a bite block with the tra-cheal tube and many anaesthetists also use it with the LMA. The aim of the following study was to compare rolled gauze swabs with a Guedel airway as a bite block for the LMA.
Methods: We compared the Guedel airway with rolled gauze swabs as a bite block for the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in 120 ventilated patients in whom cuff pressures were limited to 5.87 kPa (60 cm H₂₀) and anaesthesia management was standardised.
Results: In the Guedel airway group, there was a higher incidence of ventilatory problems (0 vs 4, P < 0.05), bleeding (0 vs 8, P < 0.01), hoarseness (0 vs 4, P 0.05) and sore throat (2 vs 12, P < 0.01).
Conclusion: 1. The Guedel airway is an unsuitable bite block for the LMA. 2. Cuff pressure limitation is compatible with adequate ventilation. 3. The combination of LMA and Guedel airway probably prevents either from sitting in the correct anatomical position.     

Visible and occult blood contamination of laryngeal mask airways and tracheal tubes used in adult anaesthesia

The purpose of this study was to compare visible and occult blood contamination of 50 laryngeal mask airways and 50 tracheal tubes following routine anaesthesia for procedures not involving the oropharyngeal or nasal cavities. All airway devices were examined visually for the presence of blood before washing in 100 ml of water. A semiquantitative dipstick was used to test for the presence of blood in the washings. Laryngeal mask airways were examined visually by both authors to test agreement. The results show that occult blood contamination occurred in 78% of tracheal tubes and 76% of laryngeal mask airways, while visible blood contamination was 16% and 12%, respectively. Other studies reporting visible blood contamination of airway devices probably underestimate the true incidence of blood contamination. Oral secretions following the use of these devices should be considered as high risk for transmission of blood-born viruses. Anaesthetic and recovery staff should be protected against the risks of occupational exposure to oral secretions following the use of airway devices.     

Thyroplasty under total intravenous anaesthesia with intermittent positive pressure ventilation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medialization thyroplasty is a surgical technique for improving voice quality, cough effort and laryngeal competence in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Precision surgery is enabled by operating under total intravenous anaesthesia with controlled ventilation and by using a laryngoscopic video-assisted technique. The anaesthetic challenge is to manage the shared airway with the surgeon, provide a stable operative field and ensure patient safety throughout the procedure. The objective of this case series was to evaluate the use of a modified general anaesthetic technique using the laryngeal mask airway, total intravenous anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all, 29 patients underwent medialization thyroplasty using a disposable laryngeal mask airway, total intravenous anaesthesia and controlled ventilation. Standard anaesthetic monitoring including capnography was used intraoperatively. Total intravenous anaesthesia was achieved using effect site target-controlled infusions of propofol and remifentanil. CONCLUSIONS: The technique proved safe with stable haemodynamic observations and only two minor complications. It also provided the surgeon with stable view of the vocal folds in order to perform this precision surgery under an operating microscope.     

EFFECT OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY ON LOWER OESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE IN PATIENTS DURING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

We have studied the tone of the lower oesophageal sphincter(LOS) in 40 adults undergoing routine body surface surgery andallocated randomly to receive anaesthesia either by face maskand Guedel airway or by laryngeal mask airway. In the laryngealmask group there was a mean (SEM) decrease in barrier pressure(LOS minus gastric pressure) of 3.6 (1.4) cm H², compared witha mean increase of 2.2 (1.2) cm H2O in the face mask group (P< 0.005).     

The laryngeal mask and VBM laryngeal tube compared during spontaneous ventilation. A pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The laryngeal tube is a variant of the oesophageal obturator airway. The manufacturer claims that it is an alternative to ventilation with a facemask, laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube. To date, published studies have only involved controlled ventilation. We wished to find out if its use in spontaneous ventilation was equivalent to using the laryngeal mask airway. METHODS: We have compared the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask in a randomized prospective study involving patients breathing spontaneously under general anaesthesia. Criteria and a scoring system were used for the comparison. A sequential analysis chart with P=0.01 was chosen for each of two anaesthetists. RESULTS: Only seven and 10 pairs of patients were required to indicate that the laryngeal tube was poorer at airway maintenance than the laryngeal mask. Of the 17 patients who had received the laryngeal tube, successful airway maintenance was only possible in seven. In the remaining 10 patients, the laryngeal tube was abandoned and the rescue airway was the laryngeal mask in all cases. All 17 patients randomized to the laryngeal mask were successfully managed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the laryngeal tube is not a satisfactory device for management of the airway during spontaneous ventilation.     

A French survey of paediatric airway management use in tonsillectomy and appendicectomy

BACKGROUND: There are no epidemiological data describing tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway (LMATM) use in paediatric anaesthesia. This analysis focused on the factors leading to the indication for an airway management procedure, i.e. tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway vs face mask during general anaesthesia for tonsillectomy and appendicectomy. METHODS: The data were recorded in the French survey of Practical Anaesthesia performed in 1996. Two main types of surgical procedures were selected: tonsillectomy and appendicectomy because of the number of patients and the need to use an invasive airway management technique. RESULTS: During a 1-year period, 627 anaesthetics for appendicectomy and 653 anaesthetics for tonsillectomy were recorded in the sample under consideration. Tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway was undertaken in 66% of tonsillectomies and 84% of appendicectomies. Univariate analysis showed that tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask were used significantly more often in older children, with long duration of anaesthesia, in nonambulatory procedures and in procedures performed at an academic centre. When these variables were included in a multivariate analysis, the duration of anaesthesia over 30 min was a factor linked to the use of tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask airway for the two types of surgery (P < 0.0001). For tonsillectomy, inpatients were 2.9 times more likely to be intubated (or have an laryngeal mask airway) than were outpatients. For appendicectomy, older children were 3.4 times more likely to be intubated (or have an laryngeal mask airway) than younger children. CONCLUSIONS: This large French survey shows that the use of tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask airway in this country is primarily related to a predicted long duration of anaesthesia.     

REGURGITATION OF GASTRIC CONTENTS DURING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA USING THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY

We have investigated the incidence of regurgitation of gastriccontents during general anaesthesia administered via a laryngeaimask airway (LMA) or face mask and Guedel airway in 56 patientswith no risk factors for regurgitation. Patients swallowed agelatine capsule containing methylene blue 10 min before inductionof anaesthesia. Fibreoptic laryn–goscopy in the LMA groupor conventional laryn-goscopy in the face mask group was performedat the end of surgery. Dye was observed within the laryngeaimask in seven of 28 patients (25%). No patients in the facemask-Guedel airway group regurgitated dye (P = 0.005). Therewas no evidence of aspiration of dye.      

The laryngeal mask airway: its features,effects and role

The laryngeal mask airway was designed as a new concept in airway management and has been gaining a firm position in anaesthetic practice. Numerous articles and letters about the device have been published in the last decade, but few large controlled trials have been performed. Despite widespread use, the definitive role of the laryngeal mask has yet to be established. In some situations, such as after failed tracheal intubation or in anaesthesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic or oral surgery, its use is controversial. There are a number of unresolved issues, for example the effect of the laryngeal mask on regurgitation and whether or not cricoid pressure prevents placement of the mask. We review the techniques of insertion, details of misplacement, and complications associated with the use of the laryngeal mask. We discuss the features and physiological effects of the device, including the changes in intra-cuff pressure during anaesthesia and effects on blood pressure, heart rate and intra-ocular pressure. We then attempt to clarify the role of the laryngeal mask in airway management during anaesthesia, based on the current knowledge, by discussing the advantages and disadvantages as well as the indications and contraindications of its use. Lastly we describe the use of the laryngeal mask in circumstances other than airway maintenance during anaesthesia: fibreoptic bronchoscopy, tracheal intubation through the mask and its use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.     

Comparison of cuff-pressure changes in LMA-Classic and the new Soft Seal laryngeal masks during nitrous oxide anaesthesia in spontaneous breathing patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are concerns over the intra-cuff pressure of the laryngeal mask and laryngopharyngeal morbidity. In a randomized study, the authors compared cuff-pressure changes in the LMA-Classic and the new disposable Soft Seal laryngeal mask during nitrous oxide anaesthesia. METHODS: Two-hundred adult patients were randomly assigned to a size 4 laryngeal mask in two equal-sized groups for airway management: (a) the re-usable LMA-Classic, or (b) the new disposable Soft Seal laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia was administered with fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide, O2 and sevoflurane. The cuff pressures, adjusted to 45 mmHg at insertion, were monitored continuously until the end of the operation without any further attempt to reduce cuff pressure. On removal of the laryngeal mask, any blood at all was considered positive. Patients were requested to report any sore throat at 2 and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: During nitrous oxide anaesthesia, cuff pressures increased in the LMA-Classic group from 45 to 100.3 mmHg and from 45 to 46.8 mmHg in the Soft Seal laryngeal mask group (P < 0.001). The incidence of sore throat was significantly higher at 2 h postoperatively when using the LMA-Classic, although there was no difference at 24 h following the operation. Macroscopic blood was only seen on four occasions in the LMA-Classic group (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: During nitrous oxide anaesthesia, cuff pressure increases in the LMA-Classic mask were significantly higher than those of the Soft Seal laryngeal mask. Trauma to patients, as assessed by the incidence of sore throat in the early postoperative period was significantly higher in the LMA-Classic group. Cuff pressures should be monitored during nitrous oxide anaesthesia when LMA-Classic is used but to do so is of less importance when using the disposable Soft Seal laryngeal mask.     

A comparison of laryngeal mask airway with tracheal tube for intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery

The use of the laryngeal mask was compared with tracheal intubation in 30 patients who underwent intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery and who received intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Changes in intra-ocular pressure, heart rate and mean arterial pressure after the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway or the tracheal tube were not significantly different. However, at the end of the procedure, a significantly higher percentage of patients with a tracheal tube coughed, reacted to head movement and suffered breath-holding. In addition, significantly more patients in this group complained of a sore throat (p less than 0.05). During intravenous propofol anaesthesia, the laryngeal mask airway does not offer any advantage over tracheal intubation in the control of intra-ocular pressure for intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery. However, there were fewer complications immediately following surgery in the laryngeal mask group.     

The reinforced laryngeal mask in paediatric outpatient dental surgery

One hundred and twenty ASA I and II grade children aged 2-9 years scheduled for outpatient dental extractions under general anaesthesia were studied. They were allocated randomly to one of three groups for airway management: group R had anaesthesia with a reinforced laryngeal mask airway, group L with a standard laryngeal mask airway and group N with a nasal mask. Anaesthesia was induced in all children using halothane in 50% nitrous oxide with oxygen and maintained on halothane in 67% nitrous oxide with oxygen. An Ayre's T-piece with Jackson-Rees modification was used. The incidence of airway obstruction was significantly lower and surgical access significantly better with the reinforced laryngeal mask airway when compared with the standard laryngeal mask airway. However, the reinforced laryngeal mask airway was significantly more difficult to insert when compared with the standard laryngeal mask airway. On comparing the reinforced laryngeal mask airway with the nasal mask, there were significantly fewer episodes of airway obstruction, better oxygen saturation, less increase in heart rate and fewer arrhythmias in the reinforced laryngeal mask airway group. Total time for the procedures was the same for all three groups. Thus, the reinforced laryngeal mask airway was found to be a favourable alternative to the standard laryngeal mask airway and nasal mask for paediatric outpatient dental extractions.     

Airway protection by the laryngeal mask

Methylene blue was placed in the pharynx of 64 patients undergoing anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask. No leak of dye into the larynx was detected on fibreoptic inspection of the inside of the mask in any subject. The use of the laryngeal mask as a means of protecting the airway during procedures such as minor nasal operations is therefore supported.     

COMPARISON OF THE USE OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AND FACE MASK BY INEXPERIENCED PERSONNEL

Ten junior doctors with no postgraduate anaesthetic experienceattempted to ventilate the lungs of 50 anaesthetized patients,using either a laryngeal mask or a Guedel airway and face mask.Success was defined as the production of two successive tidalvolumes exceeding 800 ml within 40 s. The failure rate was significantlygreater using the laryngeal mask compared with the face mask(P < 0.05) and the average time was significantly longerwith the laryngeal mask than with the face mask (P < 0.01). The results from this investigation suggest the laryngealmask airway cannot be recommended as a resuscitation devicefor use by inexperienced operators.     

Respiratory complications associated with tracheal extubationTiming of tracheal extubation and use of the laryngeal mask during emergence from anaesthesia

Sixty patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups and the incidences of respiratory complications which occurred during emergence from anaesthesia were compared under the following three circumstances: tracheal extubation after the patient had regained consciousness (awake group); tracheal extubation while the patient was still anaesthetised (anaesthetised group); and the use of the laryngeal mask during emergence from anaesthesia (mask group). In the mask group, the laryngeal mask was inserted under deep anaesthesia before tracheal extubation and the lungs were ventilated through the laryngeal mask after tracheal extubation. In the awake group, straining (bucking) occurred in 18 patients and desaturation (arterial oxygen haemoglobin saturation < 95%) in two patients. In the anaesthetised group, airway obstruction occurred in 17 patients and desaturation in one of these patients. In the mask group, ventilation through the laryngeal mask was temporarily difficult immediately after tracheal extubation in one patient and coughing occurred before removal of the mask in three patients. No respiratory complications occurred in two patients in the awake group, three patients in the anaesthetised group and 16 patients in the mask group. The incidence of respiratory complications during recovery from anaesthesia was significantly lower in the mask group than in the other two groups (pooled) (p << 0.001). Therefore, the use of the laryngeal mask after tracheal extubation decreases the incidence of respiratory complications during recovery from anaesthesia.     

Œdème pulmonaire aigu par inhalation du cale-dents au réveil d’une anesthésie avec un masque laryngéPulmonary oedema due to the inhalation of the LMA bite-block during recovery.

We report a case of acute pulmonary oedema, consecutive to upper airway obstruction due to the inhalation of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) bite block during recovery. The LMA was used for general anaesthesia with the bite-block provided in France. No trouble occurred during LMA insertion and anaesthesia. Symptomatic treatment provided complete resolution within a few days.