Breast and tumor volumes on 3D-MRI and their impact on the performance of a breast conservative surgery (BCS)

Breast conservation rate is being increasingly used nowadays as a marker of breast cancer care among hospitals. Searching for the ideal technique to predict the feasibility of BCS is ongoing. For this matter, the preoperative MRIs of 169 patients operated with radical or conservative surgery were reviewed. We estimated the tumor volume (TV) and breast volume (BV) on enhanced 3D-MRI and compared the tumor-to-breast volume ratio (TV/BV) in both groups. The mean ratio was 9.5% in the mastectomy group and 1.7% in the BCS group. A tumor-to-breast volume ratio less than 4% seemed to favor the adoption of a conservative option. Our data suggest that preoperative 3D-MRI can orient the surgical approach by assessing the TV/BV ratio, increasing lumpectomy rates with clear margins and good cosmetic outcome.     

Endoscopic-assisted skin-sparing mastectomy combined with sentinel node biopsy

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been carried out as desirable choice for patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, many patients obliged to abandon BCS because of tumours accompanied by extended intraductal components or multiple tumours. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel endoscopic-assisted technique for skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) combined with sentinel node biopsy (SNB), followed by immediate breast reconstruction with mammary prosthesis. Between April 2000 and November 2006, 33 patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer underwent endoscopic-assisted SSM. Immediate reconstruction with the mammary prosthesis was carried out in 30 of 33 patients. On postoperative histopathological diagnosis, 21 tumours were diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ or lobular carcinoma in situ. Twelve tumours were diagnosed as invasive carcinoma. Eight of 12 invasive carcinomas were accompanied by a wide spreading intraductal component. Two patients were diagnosed as having multicentric carcinomas, which made the standard breast-conserving treatment difficult. After a mean follow-up period of 51.2 months (range 16-86 months), neither locoregional recurrence nor distant metastasis has been detected. Thus, combining SSM and SNB with immediate reconstruction with the mammary prosthesis may offer the selected patients with early-stage breast cancer favourable aesthetic results without incurring additional oncological risks. The procedure could be an alternative treatment option for patients with widely spreading intraductal component or multiple tumours.     

Breast conservation for male breast cancer: Case report of intraoperative radiation

Male breast cancer (MBC) comprises <1% of all breast cancers in the United States. MBC is typically treated with total mastectomy while the majority of female breast cancer is treated with breast conservation therapy combined with various forms of radiation. One method that has developed over the last two decades is the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a type of accelerated partial breast irradiation to direct the treatment field to the tumor bed. Since overall prognosis and systemic therapy recommendations for MBC are similar to breast cancer in women, we describe the first case of MBC treated with BCS and IORT. Our patient is a 62‐year‐old male who was found to have a right breast 1.6 cm palpable mass at the 10:00 position 1 cm radially from the nipple. Core biopsy demonstrated invasive ductal carcinoma, moderately differentiated, estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, and Her 2 Negative. The patient had a strong desire for breast conservation, and needed to minimize daily radiation treatments due to his work schedule. After discussion among our multidisciplinary tumor board, we felt this patient to be suitable for BCS and IORT given his age, favorable tumor subtype, size, and clinically early stage breast cancer. A right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy and central lumpectomy was performed. The INTRABEAM device (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany) was utilized for radiation delivery. The patient had negative margins on his final pathology. The postoperative course was uneventful and at the 6 month follow‐up visit there were no issues and he had an excellent cosmetic outcome. BCS and IORT is an option in appropriately selected male patients with favorable subtype early stage breast cancer.     

Subsequent surgery after initial breast conserving surgery: a population based study

BACKGROUND: In line with current Australian early breast cancer management guidelines, more women are having breast conserving surgery to treat breast cancer when appropriate. Some women will undergo further surgery because of involved margins, early local relapse, or other factors including patient choice. The aim of this study was to investigate whether socio-economic, demographic or hospital factors were associated with the risk of re-excision or subsequent mastectomy. METHODS: A record linkage population-based study on 12 711 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Western Australia from 1982 to 2000 who underwent breast surgery within 12 months of diagnosis was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify social, demographic and hospital factors associated with the risk of undergoing further surgery following initial breast conserving surgery. RESULTS: The proportion of women undergoing initial breast conserving surgery doubled from 33% in 1982-1985 to 72% in 1998-2000. The proportion of women who underwent further surgery following initial breast conserving surgery decreased from 50 to 30% over the same period. The risk of re-excision or subsequent mastectomy was between 2.4 (95% CI 1.7-3.4) and 5.0 (95% CI 3.4-7.4) times greater if initial surgery was performed in a non-metropolitan hospital compared to Perth hospitals. Younger women were between 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-2.0) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-3.0) times more likely to undergo re-excisions compared to women aged 50-64 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Young women and women initially treated in non-metropolitan hospitals were at an increased risk of re-excision or a subsequent mastectomy following initial breast conserving surgery to treat breast cancer. Efforts need to be directed towards improving specialist health services outside of Perth if women continue to be treated for breast cancer in non-metropolitan hospitals.     

Survival after Breast‐Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast or Partial Breast Irradiation in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A SEER Data‐base Analysis

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated equivalency in survival outcomes for early stage breast cancer patients treated with either mastectomy or breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation. Recent, state‐level data confirm comparable survival outcomes. Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Research (SEER) data, we sought to evaluate survival outcomes among patients with early stage breast cancer treated with mastectomy, BCS with whole breast irradiation (BCS + WBI), or BCS with accelerated partial breast irradiation (BCS + APBI). Data on women 50 years or older diagnosed with a node negative invasive breast cancer (≤3 cm in size) between 1995 and 2009 were extracted from the SEER data base. Women treated with mastectomy alone or BCS with radiation were eligible for analysis. Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) among the treatment groups. 150,171 women fulfilled inclusion criteria. OS was significantly improved among women treated with BCS and WBI or BCS and APBI compared to mastectomy alone. Adjusted hazard ratios for death in BCS with WBI or APBI (versus mastectomy alone) were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.79), respectively. Adjusted CSS was also significantly improved in patients treated with BCS and WBI (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.85) as compared to mastectomy. BCS with radiation (WBI or APBI) was associated with significantly improved OS and CSS, versus mastectomy alone. These results support the use of BCS with WBI or APBI (in well selected patients) for the treatment of breast cancer.     

Periareolar Approach in Oncoplastic Breast Conservative Surgery

Breast cancer represents the most frequent cancer in female population. Nowadays breast conservative surgery (BCS) is an accepted option for breast malignancies, and its indications has been extended thanks to the advent of oncoplastic surgery, reducing both mastectomy and re‐excision rate, avoiding at the same time breast deformities. From January 2008 to November 2011, 84 women underwent BCS with periareolar approach for oncoplastic volume replacement. We divided patients into four groups analyzing breast size and resection volume (Group 1: small‐moderate sized breast with resection <20%; Group 2: small‐moderate sized breast with resection >20%; Group 3: big sized breast with resection <20%; Group 4: big sized breast with resection >20%). We evaluated patients’ satisfaction regarding final esthetic outcome using the specific module “Satisfaction with outcome” of the Breast‐Q questionnaire 1 year after surgery. The mean age was 52.1 years, and the mean follow‐up was 11.2 months. During the follow‐up, 12 patients have been lost. We obtained high satisfaction mean value with Breast‐Q questionnaire in each group: 75.8 in group 1, 63.4 in group 2, 81.1 in group 3, 69.7 in group 4. Periareolar approach as oncoplastic volume replacement technique is useful in correction of breast deformity after BCS: it is a versatile technique that can be easily adapted for any breast tumor location and for wide glandular resection.     

Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery

BACKGROUND: Persistently involved margins following breast conservation surgery (BCS) create a diagnostic dilemma regarding the recommendation of further BCS or mastectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 276 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS and required additional surgical treatment between 1990-2002 was performed. RESULTS: For treatment of persistently involved margins, 63% of subjects underwent re-excision the first time, 49% the second time, and 37% the third time. The incidence of residual carcinoma increased linearly with the number of initially involved margins (P = .03). Ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) or infiltrating lobular carcinoma (IFLC) primary histology was associated with a higher rate of residual cancer compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IFDC) (62% vs. 69% vs. 54%, respectively, P = .56). A trend towards an increased risk of residual cancer in primary tumors > or =2 cm versus tumors under 2 cm was also evident (63%% vs. 50%, respectively, P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of patients repeatedly selected BCS over mastectomy. It is important to realistically discuss the probability of definitive resection with patients who are undergoing breast conservation with re-excision.     

Patterns of Surgical Treatment for Women with Breast Cancer in Relation to Age

Abstract: Although treatment recommendations have been advocated for all women with early breast cancer regardless of age, it is generally accepted that different treatments are preferred based on the age of the patient. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of breast cancer surgery after adjusting for other major prognostic factors in relation to patient age. Data on cancer characteristics and surgical procedures in 31,298 patients with early breast cancer reported to the National Breast Cancer Audit between 1999 and 2006 were used for the study. There was a close association between age and surgical treatment pattern after adjusting for other prognostic factors, including tumor size, histologic grade, number of tumors, lymph node positivity, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and extensive intraduct component. Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) was highest among women aged ≤40 years (OR = 1.140; 95% CI: 1.004–1.293) compared to women aged 51–70 years (reference group). BCS was lowest in women aged >70 years (OR = 0.498, 95% CI: 0.455–0.545). Significantly more women aged ≤50 years underwent more than one operation for breast conservation (20.4–24.8%) compared with women aged >50 years (11.4–17.0%). Women aged >70 years were more likely to receive no surgical treatment, 3.5% versus 1.0–1.3% in all other age groups (≤40, 41–50 51–70 years). There is an association between patient age and the type of breast cancer surgery for women in Australia and New Zealand. Women age ≤40 years are more likely to undergo BCS despite having adverse histologic features and have more than one procedure to achieve breast conservation. Older women (>70 years) more commonly undergo mastectomy and are more likely to receive no surgical treatment.     

Trends in surgical treatment of younger patients with breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand

Background: The optimal surgical treatment of early breast cancer in young women is not fully determined, while past reports indicate a trend to the increased use of breast‐conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to assess the trend in Australia and New Zealand of BCS use between 1999 and 2006 and to determine pathological factors associated with it. Methods: Data on cancer characteristics and surgical procedures in younger patients with early breast cancer reported to the National Breast Cancer Audit have been analysed. Results: There was little change in the rate of BCS over the last 7 years with an overall rate of 53%. The main factors associated with the use of BCS are low histological grade, absence of extensive intraductal carcinoma (EIC), negative lymph node involvement, unifocal tumour and small tumour size. Conclusion: Between 1999 and 2006, the use of BCS for early breast cancer treatment in younger women was stable. These results show that surgeons contributing data to the National Breast Cancer Audit appear to use pathological factors that are known to increase the risk of local recurrence after BCS, in selecting mastectomy for younger women.     

Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the US according to Health Insurance Status

Although standard practice guidelines for breast cancer are clear, the interplay between insurance and practice patterns for the US is poorly defined. This study was performed to test for associations between patient insurance status and presentation of breast cancer as well as local therapy patterns in the US, via a large national dataset. We queried the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data base for breast cancer cases diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 in women aged 18–64 with nonmetastatic ductal/lobular cancers, treated surgically. We tested for associations between insurance status (insured/Medicaid/uninsured) and choice of surgical procedure (mastectomy/breast conserving surgery [BCS]), omission of radiotherapy (RT) following BCS, and administration of post‐mastectomy radiation (PMRT). There were 129,565 patients with localized breast cancer analyzed. The health insurance classification included insured (84.5%), Medicaid (11.5%), uninsured (2.1%) and unknown (1.9%). Medicaid or uninsured status was associated with large, node positive tumors, black race, and low income. The BCS rate varied by insurance status: insured (52.2%), uninsured (47.7%), and Medicaid (45.2%), p < 0.001. In multivariable analysis, Medicaid insurance remained significantly associated with receipt of mastectomy (OR [95% CI] = 1.07 [1.03–1.11]), while RT was more frequently omitted after BCS in both Medicaid (OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [1.07–1.21]) and uninsured (OR [95% CI] = 1.29 [1.14–1.47]) patients. Insurance status was associated with significant variations in breast cancer care in the US. Although patient choice cannot be determined from this dataset, departure from standard of care is associated with specific types of insurance coverage. Further investigation into the reasons for these departures is strongly suggested.     

Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Multiple long‐term studies have demonstrated a propensity for breast cancer recurrences to develop near the site of the original breast cancer. Recognition of this local recurrence pattern laid the foundation for the development of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) approaches designed to limit the radiation treatment field to the site of the malignancy. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of APBI in general, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), in particular, for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). As a result, use of APBI, remains controversial. A prospective nonrandomized trial was designed to determine if patients with pure DCIS considered eligible for concurrent IORT based on preoperative mammography and contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) could be successfully treated using IORT with minimal need for additional therapy due to inadequate surgical margins or excessive tumor size. Between November 2007 and June 2014, 35 women underwent bilateral digital mammography and bilateral breast CE‐MRI prior to selection for IORT. Patients were deemed eligible for IORT if their lesion was ≤4 cm in maximal diameter on both digital mammography and CE‐MRI, pure DCIS on minimally invasive breast biopsy or wide local excision, and considered resectable with clear surgical margins using breast‐conserving surgery (BCS). Postoperatively, the DCIS lesion size determined by imaging was compared with lesion size and surgical margin status obtained from the surgical pathology specimen. Thirty‐five patients completed IORT. Median patient age was 57 years (range 42–79 years) and median histologic lesion size was 15.6 mm (2–40 mm). No invasive cancer was identified. In more than half of the patients in our study (57.1%), MRI failed to detect a corresponding lesion. Nonetheless, 30 patients met criteria for negative margins (i.e., margins ≥2 mm) whereas five patients had positive margins (<2 mm). Two of the five patients with positive margins underwent mastectomy due to extensive imaging‐occult DCIS. Three of the five patients with positive margins underwent successful re‐excision at a subsequent operation prior to subsequent whole breast irradiation. A total of 14.3% (5/35) of patients required some form of additional therapy. At 36 months median follow‐up (range of 2–83 months, average 42 months), only two patients experienced local recurrences of cancer (DCIS only), yielding a 5.7% local recurrence rate. No deaths or distant recurrences were observed. Imaging‐occult DCIS is a challenge for IORT, as it is for all forms of breast‐conserving therapy. Nonetheless, 91.4% of patients with DCIS were successfully managed with BCS and IORT alone, with relatively few patients requiring additional therapy.     

Male breast cancer: Modified radical mastectomy or breast conservation surgery? A case report and review of the literature

IntroductionMale breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease that accounts for <1% of breast cancer cases. The most common treatment is modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Recently, breast conservative surgery (BCS) is getting popular for MBC treatment. We report a case and reviewed the literature to investigate whether emerging BCS can be considered as an alternative of a more radical surgery.Presentation of caseA 46 y.o. patient, presented with a painless left breast lump over a period of six months. The patient underwent a quadrantectomy at another institution. Pathology revealed an intraductal carcinoma in close proximity to the margins of excision. Adjuvant hormonal therapy was proposed to the patient, who refused and was referred to our Institution. We performed a MRM and a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A contralateral breast liposuction and an adenectomy were also performed. The patient underwent also a nipple-areolar complex reconstruction. The patient didn’t receive adjuvant therapy.DiscussionBoth oncological safety and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes are the goals of MBC treatment. No specific guidelines for MBC treatment have been proposed. MRM is currently the surgical gold standard of MBC (approximately 70% of all cases). Some authors reported that male BCS associated with radiation therapy is a feasible alternative MRM. Taking into account data from the literature and considering the previous surgery, in the case we report, we offered a MRM, SLNB and a contralateral breast symmetrization.ConclusionMRM with SLNB and reconstruction of male breast asymmetry should be still considered as the treatment of choice of MBC.     

Axillary dissection in breast-conserving surgery for stage i and ii breast cancer: a national cancer data base study of patterns of omission and implications for survival

Background: Breast conservation (partial mastectomy, axillary node dissection or sampling, and radiotherapy) is the current standard of care for eligible patients with Stages I and II breast cancer. Because axillary node dissection (AND) has a low yield, some have argued for its omission. The present study was undertaken to determine factors that correlated with omission of AND, and the impact of the decision to omit AND on 10-year relative survival.

Study Design: A retrospective review of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data for 547,847 women with Stage I and Stage II breast cancer treated in US hospitals from 1985 to 1995 was undertaken. A subset of 47,944 Stage I and 23,283 Stage II women treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was identified. Cross-tab analysis was used to compare patterns of surgical care within this subset. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to the expected survival for women of the same age and racial/ethnic background.

Results: The rate of BCS with and without AND increased steadily from 17.6% and 6.4% of patients from 1985–1989, to 36.6% and 10.6% of patients from 1993–1995 respectively. AND was more likely to be omitted in women with Stage I than women with Stage II disease (14.5% versus 5.5%). Similarly, AND was omitted more frequently in women with Grade 1 than women with higher grades (Grade 1, 14.9%; Grade 2, 10.1%; Grade 3, 7.1%; Grade 4, 7%). Although the rate of BCS with AND varied considerably according to location in the breast, the overall rate of BCS without AND appeared independent of site of lesion. Women over the age of 70 years were more than twice as likely to have AND omitted from BCS than their younger counterparts. Women with lower incomes, women treated in the Northeast, or at hospitals with annual caseloads < 150 were all less likely to undergo AND than their corresponding counterparts. Ten-year relative survival for Stage I women treated with partial mastectomy and AND was 85% (n = 1242) versus 66% (n = 1684) for comparable women in whom AND was omitted. BCS with AND followed by radiation therapy for Stage I disease resulted in 94% (n = 5469) 10-year relative survival, compared with 85% (n = 1284) without AND. Addition of both radiation and chemotherapy to BCS with AND for Stage I disease resulted in 86% (n = 2800) versus 58% (n = 512) without AND. In contrast, Stage II women treated with BCS with AND followed by radiation and chemotherapy experienced a 72% 10-year relative survival.

Conclusions: A significant number of women with Stage I breast cancer do not undergo AND as part of BCS. The trend is most pronounced for the elderly, but significant fractions of women of all ages are also being undertreated by current standards. Ten-year survival is significantly worse when AND is omitted. This adverse survival effect is not solely from understaging.     

Outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery in 90 prospective patients

Background

Oncoplastic breast surgery refers to a wide range of techniques with a parallel goal of safely removing all malignant breast tissue while achieving the best possible esthetic outcome. We report the results of our oncoplastic breast operations from 2005 to 2007.

Methods

Ninety selected breast cancer patients were treated with a variety of oncoplastic operations. The patients were prospectively monitored. Radiotherapy and systemic adjuvant treatment were given according to national guidelines.

Results

Fifteen patients had an immediate surgical complication, of which 8 required a reoperation. Eleven patients had an inadequate surgical margin and required a completion mastectomy. During a median follow-up of 26 months no local or regional recurrences were noticed. Three patients developed distant metastases.

Conclusions

Oncoplastic breast surgery offers tools for breast conservation in patients otherwise destined for mastectomy or poor esthetic outcome. Despite the high proportion of patients in this series with large-volume ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or extensive intraductal component, the use of oncoplastic techniques achieved negative margins with acceptable cosmetic results in the majority (84%) of patients.     

Using therapeutic mammoplasty to extend the role of breast-conserving surgery in women with larger or ptotic breasts

Introduction

The equivalence of breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy against mastectomy is now firmly established in patients with early breast cancer. The results of surgery in large-breasted women can be poor, with radiation-induced fibrosis, chronic pain and poor cosmesis contributing to long-term psychological and physical morbidity. Therapeutic mammoplasty offers an alternative management strategy to both enhance the role of breast-conserving surgery and provide better outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective note review was undertaken of all patients undergoing therapeutic mammoplasty for breast malignancy between 2007 and 2011. All cases were performed using a Wise pattern-reduction technique. Histology and pathological outcomes were assessed. Postoperative outcomes reviewed included wound infection, seroma and need for further intervention.

Results

During the study period, 20 patients underwent therapeutic mammoplasty with a mean follow-up duration of 36 months. The mean weight of the lumpectomy specimen was 330g. The average cancer size was 34mm, with a mean margin clearance of 7mm. There was one episode of wound infection and three of delayed wound healing at the T-junction. One patient required a mastectomy for involved margins. There were no recurrences at the most recent follow-up visit.

Conclusions

Therapeutic mammoplasty offers a tailored approach to women with larger breasts and early breast cancers with good cosmetic results and oncological outcomes.     

Rates for mastectomy are lower in women attending a breast-screening programme

Background: Mammographic screening for breast cancer facilitates earlier recognition of lesions, thus potentially allowing for breast‐conserving surgery. Few studies have compared the final surgical outcomes of women presenting through breast screening programmes with those presenting via other sources. Are breast cancer patients presenting through BreastScreen more likely to undergo breast‐conserving surgery than those presenting from other sources? Methods: Using the Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) Multidisciplinary Breast Service Database, the final surgical outcomes were reviewed for 723 women treated for breast cancer at RPH between January 2000 and August 2002. During this period, 397 patients were referred to the RPH Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic from BreastScreen WA, and 326 were referred from other sources. Results: Of all patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer, 58% in the screen group and 36% in the non‐screen group had breast‐conserving surgery (P < 0.0001). When surgical outcomes for women in the BreastScreen target age range of 50?69 years were analysed, 59.5% in the screen group and 42.3% in the non‐screen group had breast‐conserving surgery (P < 0.001). Patient choice was second only to disease extent as a factor determining the outcome of mastectomy. In both cohorts, more than 40% of patients who underwent re‐excisional surgery for positive margins, after initial breast‐conserving surgery, had residual invasive or in situ disease present. Conclusions: At RPH, BreastScreen patients were more likely to undergo breast‐conserving surgery than those who presented from other sources. A significant proportion of women with positive margins after initial breast‐conserving surgery had residual in situ or invasive disease. Re‐excision for positive margins was thus warranted.     

The rate of breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer is not influenced by the surgical strategy of excisional biopsy followed by the definitive procedure

Increased emphasis on breast conservation and the primacy of the patient's preferences has led to the promotion and increased use of a two-step surgical strategy (definitive operation only after a final tissue diagnosis from a biopsy done on a previous visit) in the treatment of early breast cancer, with the assumption being that this is more conducive to the performance of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). We sought to test this by examining the effect of the surgical strategy (one-step versus two-step) on the operation performed (BCS versus mastectomy). A random sample of women with node-negative breast cancer diagnosed in 1991 in Ontario was drawn from the Ontario Cancer Registry database and matched to the Canadian Institute of Health Information and Ontario Health Insurance Plan databases (n = 643). This provided information on the timing and nature of all surgical procedures performed as well as patient, tumor, hospital, and surgeon characteristics. The surgical strategy was defined as either a one-step procedure (biopsy and definitive surgery performed at the same time) or a two-step procedure (surgical biopsy and pathologic diagnosis, followed by definitive surgery at a later date). The axillary lymph node dissection was used to define the definitive procedure. BCS was employed in 68% of patients, and this did not differ significantly between the one-step and two-step groups (66% versus 70%). Patients with palpable lesions had a significantly lower rate of breast conservation than those with nonpalpable lesions. Other variables associated with a lower rate of BCS were larger tumor size, presence of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and central or multifocal tumors. The use of a one-step procedure was associated with a patient age of more than 50 years, a palpable mass, tumor size larger than 1 cm, previous fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, absence of extensive DCIS, and surgery in an academic setting. Breast conservation was not affected by the surgical strategy used or the timing of the decision, but was associated with several accepted tumor factors. This study shows that, contrary to the opinion of some, there is a group of breast cancer patients in whom treatment in a one-step manner is appropriate.     

Local and regional therapy for women with breast cancer in British Columbia

British Columbian provincial practice guidelines (PPGs) have recommended breast-conserving surgery (BCS), axillary node dissection, and radiation therapy following BCS for specific subgroups of breast cancer patients. Patient-, disease-, and physician-specific factors associated with these therapies were investigated in nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer patients. Temporal trends in BCS and physicians' experiences with PPGs were also examined. Sources of data for patient, disease, treatment, and treating physician factors included medical records, source documents, and the British Columbia Medical Directory for 967 nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed in British Columbia in 1995. BCS utilization among 496 patients with pathologically node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) was compared to earlier British Columbian data. Family physicians and surgeons were surveyed in 1997 regarding their experience with PPGs. 57% of "ideal" candidates received BCS; 87% of patients received axillary node dissection; and 95% of women treated with BCS also received radiation therapy. Tumor size, tumor location, and extent of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were associated with BCS use; age, tumor size, and tumor location were associated with axillary node dissection; and age alone was associated with radiation therapy following BCS. Fifty-four percent of NNBC patients received BCS in 1995, compared to 44% in 1991, with increases seen in most patient-, disease-, and physician-specific comparisons. The increase in BCS, and high proportion completing radiation therapy, are encouraging and may be due in part to greater exposure to PPGs.     

The Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer in the Elderly: A Single Institution Comparative Review of 5235 Patients with 1028 Patients ≥70 years

Abstract: As the wave of the baby boomers shifts the age demographic of patients, the current surgical management of breast cancer in elderly women (≥70 years of age) becomes relevant because deviation from standard treatment often occurs in this group. The purpose of this study was to determine the operative mortality when treated with standard surgical procedures and to investigate trends in the surgical management of breast cancer in the elderly. A total of 5,235 patients undergoing either mastectomy or breast conservation surgery (BCS) for invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were identified in a retrospective review of a prospectively accrued data base between the years of 1994 and 2007 at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Of the 5,235 patients, 1,028 (20%) patients were ≥70 years of age. The 30‐day and 90‐day mortality in the elderly group (age ≥70 years) was 0.2% (95% CI 0.02–0.7%) and 0.7% (95% CI 0.3–1.4%), respectively. The 30‐day and 90‐day mortality among patients <70 years was 0 and 0.05% (2 of 4,207 patients) (95% CI 0.005–0.2), respectively. BCS rates for invasive carcinomas were the highest for patients between 40 and 70 years of age, whereas the mastectomy rates were higher among patients <40 years of age (53%). Elderly women were as likely as women <40 years to have BCS for invasive carcinoma (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.5), but more likely to have BCS for DCIS (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3). Surgical mortality in elderly women treated for breast cancer was extremely low and was related to the extent of surgery performed. Breast cancer treatment differed by age groups.     

Patterns of care for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Queensland's experience over a decade

ObjectivesTo review management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in Queensland, with reference to breast conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). In addition, we examined the incidence of invasive breast cancer recurrence and factors predictive of invasive recurrence.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of the Queensland Oncology Repository identified women with resected DCIS (TisN0) ± adjuvant RT between 2003 and 2012. Time to invasive breast cancer recurrence was analysed using the Kaplan Meier method. Median follow-up was 4.9 years.Results3038 women had surgery. 940 (31%) had mastectomy and 2098 (69%) underwent BCS. Of 2098 women having BCS, 1100 (52%) received BCS alone and 998(48%) received adjuvant RT. The use of RT significantly increased over the decade from 25% to 62% (p=<0.001). Clinicopathological factors associated with RT use on multivariate analysis included age ≤70, higher socioeconomic status, larger tumour size, higher nuclear grade and surgical margins ≤5 mm. Invasive breast cancer recurrence at 5 years was 1.7% [95% CI 1.0–3.0] in RT group versus 2.8% [95% CI 2.1–3.8] in BCS alone group. Factors associated with increased risk of invasive recurrence on multivariate analysis were age <40 and surgical margins ≤2 mm.ConclusionThe use of adjuvant RT in Queensland significantly increased between 2003 and 2012. Selection of patients for RT was based on clinicopathological factors associated with higher recurrence risk. Although longer follow-up is required, the selective use of radiation therapy after BCS is associated with a low rate of invasive breast cancer recurrence at 5 years.