Effect of food on everolimus absorption: quantification in healthy subjects and a confirmatory screening in patients with renal transplants

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To quantify the influence of a high-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of the immunosuppressant everolimus in a single-dose study in healthy subjects and to confirm the results in a small food-effect screening assessment in patients with renal transplants who were receiving multiple-dose everolimus. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study and confirmatory screening. SETTING: Phase 1 unit for the single-dose study and two German hospitals for the patient screening. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four healthy male volunteers; six clinically stable patients with renal transplants who were originally part of a phase I dose-escalation study. INTERVENTION: The 24 healthy men received everolimus 2 mg orally under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal. The six patients received everolimus 2.5 mg/day orally, in addition to cyclosporine and prednisone. On two occasions, a pharmacokinetic profile was obtained over the dosing interval after drug administration under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal in a randomized sequence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the single-dose study in healthy subjects, a high-fat meal delayed everolimus time to maximum concentration (Tmax) by a median 1.25 hours, reduced peak blood concentration (Cmax) by 60%, and reduced area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 16%. In the multiple-dose screening in patients with renal transplants, a high-fat meal delayed Tmax by a median 1.75 hours and reduced Cmax by 53% and AUC by 21%. Everolimus trough levels showed no food effect, whereas the peak-trough fluctuation was dampened by 52%. CONCLUSIONS: A high-fat meal modestly reduced everolimus AUC. To minimize longitudinal variability in exposure, everolimus should be administered consistently either with food or without food.     

Pharmacokinetics of GW433908, a prodrug of amprenavir,in healthy male volunteers

These two Phase I, open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossoverstudies in 40 healthymale subjects investigated the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of various formulations of the amprenavir prodrug GW433908 in the presence and absence of food compared with amprenavir capsules. GW433908 is a phosphate ester prodrug of the antiretroviral protease inhibitor amprenavir, with improved solubility over the parent molecule and a potential for reduced pill burden on current dosing regimens. The calcium salt of the prodrug, GW433908G, was selected for further investigation, as it appeared to offer the greatest potential for the development of new drug formulations. In the fasting state, (1) GW433908G tablet and suspension were bioequivalent in terms of both AUC and Cmax, and (2) GW433908G tablet and suspension were bioequivalent to amprenavir capsules for AUC; however, Cmax was lower with GW433908G. After a high-fat meal compared with fasting, (1) the bioavailability of GW433908G suspension was decreased by 20% and Cmax by 41%, and (2) for GW433908G tablets, there was no influence on AUC(12% lower Cmax). After a low-fat meal compared with fasting, (1) there was bioequivalence for GW433908G tablets, but (2) bioavailability was decreased by 23% for amprenavir capsules (Cmax was also lower, by 46%). Overall, for GW433908G and amprenavir capsules, food had a negligible influence on plasma concentration at 12 hours postdose (C12). Whether administered as tablets or suspension, GW433908G pharmacokinetics was only slightly affected by food. GW433908G tablets were well tolerated and delivered plasma amprenavir concentrations equivalent to the recommended therapeutic amprenavir dose but with fewer tablets. The possibility of a lower pill burden offered by GW433908 may be of clinical benefit in the treatment of HIV infection.     

Assessment of the bioequivalence of two oxcarbazepine oral suspensions versus a film-coated tablet in healthy subjects

Oxcarbazepine (trileptal) oral suspension has been reformulated and a study was performed to compare the bioavailability after single doses and at steady state of the current and former oral suspension versus the marketed film-coated tablets and to compare the bioavailability of the current and former oral suspension. The results support the switch from the former oral suspension to the current oral suspension and also from both oral suspensions to the film-coated tablet and vice versa. The study was an open-label, single-center, 3-way crossover trial. Each treatment period consisted of a single dose of 600 mg oxcarbazepine on Day 1, 600 mg oxcarbazepine b.i.d. repeated administration from Day 4 up to including Day 7, and a final dose of 600 mg oxcarbazepine administered on the morning of Day 8. Blood samples were taken on Day 1, Day 7 and Day 8 (pre-dose). Plasma concentrations of the main metabolite of oxcarbazepine (MHD) were determined using a validated HPLC assay. The 2 oral suspensions were compared with the film-coated tablet as reference formulation under fasted conditions. Also the current oral suspension was compared with the former oral suspension. These comparisons were made using data following single dose administration and under steady state conditions. Plasma AUC for single dose and AUC(0-12h) at steady state and plasma Cmax, log-transformed (natural base) were used for the assessment of bioequivalence. The 90% confidence interval (CI) approach was used for testing bioequivalence. Bioequivalence was accepted if CI was contained within the region (0.8, 1.25). At steady state, both the former and the current oral suspensions showed bioequivalence with the film-coated tablet with respect to AUC and Cmax. The current oral suspension was also bioequivalent when compared to the former oral suspension with respect to AUC and Cmax. After single dose, the former oral suspension was bioequivalent when compared to the film-coated tablet with respect to both AUC and Cmax. However, the current oral suspension was bioequivalent to both the film-coated tablet and the former oral suspension with respect to AUC but not to Cmax.     

Comparative oral bioavailability of azimilide dihydrochloride in the fed and fasted states

AIMS: This study investigated the relative oral bioavailability of azimilide dihydrochloride following administration in the fed (high-fat meal) and fasted states. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study in 30 healthy, Caucasian, male subjects. Following oral administration, blood samples were collected over 27 days and analysed for azimilide using h.p.l.c. with u.v. detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using 'noncompartmental' analysis and compared using an ANOVA and 90% or 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The extent of absorption was equivalent in the fed and fasted states (ratio = 96.2%; 90% CI=90.5% -102.4%). However, Cmax was decreased 19% following a high-fat meal (ratio=81.4%; 90% CI= 76.2% -87.0%). No difference in tmax or t(1/2),z was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Azimilide dihydrochloride may be orally administered to patients without regard to the prandial state.     

Relative bioavailability of three cefixime formulations

Three galenic formulations of cefixime (tablet, syrup and dry suspension) containing 200 mg each were compared with respect to their relative bioavailability in twelve healthy volunteers. All three formulations showed reliable absorption. Mean peak plasma concentrations were reached after 3.3-3.5 h, mean terminal half lives were 2.9-3.1 h. 18-24% of the dose administered were recovered unchanged in the urine. Best bioavailability was obtained with the dry suspension (AUC0-infinity = 25.8 +/- 7.0 micrograms/ml h; Cmax = 3.4 +/- 0.9 microgram/ml), followed by the tablet (AUC0-infinity = 20.9 +/- 8.1 micrograms/ml h; Cmax = 3.0 +/- 1.0 micrograms/ml) and the syrup which is based on triglycerides (AUC0-infinity = 17.8 +/- 5.9 micrograms/ml h; Cmax = 2.4 +/- 0.7 micrograms/ml). The statistical analysis resulted in bioinequivalence between dry suspension and syrup. It is concluded that best bioavailability of cefixime after oral administration is guaranteed when taken in an "aqueous medium" either as dry suspension or as tablet with "plenty of liquid".     

Bioavailability of a crushed pantoprazole tablet after buffering with sodium hydrogencarbonate or magaldrate relative to the intact enteric coated pantoprazole tablet.

The aim of this study was to determine the bioavailability of orally administered, crushed pantoprazole tablets after buffering with either 1.4% sodium hydrogencarbonate or 1600 mg magaldrate relative to the intact enteric coated pantoprazole tablet. A single dose, three-period crossover study was performed with 18 healthy male volunteers. The crushed pantoprazole suspension, together with either sodium hydrogencarbonate or magaldrate, was administered via a nasogastral tube. Tmax of crushed pantoprazole was earlier as compared to the intact tablet (0.5 h vs. 3 h) and Cmax was approximately 10% higher due to faster absorption. The bioavailability of the crushed pantoprazole tablet relative to the intact pantoprazole tablet was 93% when using sodium hydrogencarbonate as the buffering agent, and 88% when using magaldrate. Based on the internationally approved confidence intervals for AUC (0.80-1.20) and Cmax (0.70-1.43), the crushed tablet buffered with sodium hydrogencarbonate was shown to be bioequivalent with the intact tablet (point estimates for AUC or Cmax: 0.93 or 1.10). For the crushed tablet buffered with magaldrate (point estimates for AUC or Cmax: 0.88 or 1.12) bioequivalence with the intact tablet could not be formally demonstrated, although the lower confidence limit for AUC of 0.78 was only slightly below the lower limit of the equivalence range of 0.80.     

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib malate (SU11248), a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: results from a phase I study in healthy subjects

The effect of food on the oral bioavailability of sunitinib malate (SU11248, an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activities) was assessed in a randomized open-label, two-way crossover study. A 50-mg dose of SU11248 was administered to 16 healthy subjects after a 10-h fast in one period and after a high-fat, high-calorie meal in the other period. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were within the 80-125% bioequivalence range, indicating the absence of a food effect. SU11248 exposure increased slightly in the fed compared with the fasted state (ratios of fed/fasted geometric least square means: Cmax 104%, AUC0-last and AUC0-infinity both 112%). There was a delay in the formation/absorption of the active metabolite SU12662 in the fed state (mean Cmax decreased 23%), but exposure remained unaffected (90% CIs for AUC0-last and AUC0-infinity were within 80-125%). These results indicate that SU11248 can be administered with or without food.     

Clinical development of an everolimus pediatric formulation: relative bioavailability,food effect,and steady-state pharmacokinetics

The immunosuppressant everolimus used in organ transplantation is formulated as a conventional tablet for adults and a dispersible tablet that can be administered in water for pediatric use. As part of the pediatric clinical development program, the relative bioavailability and food effect for the dispersible tablet were evaluated in healthy adult subjects as a prelude to characterizing the steady-state pharmacokinetics in pediatric kidney allograft recipients. In a randomized, open-label, three-way crossover study, 24 healthy adults received single 1.5-mg oral doses of everolimus as (1) six 0.25-mg dispersible tablets in water, (2) two 0.75-mg conventional tablets, and (3) six 0.25-mg dispersible tablets in water after a high-fat breakfast. Cmax and AUC were evaluated by standard bioequivalence testing to determine relative bioavailability and to quantify the effect of food. In a multicenter open-label efficacy/safety trial, pediatric renal allograft recipients received 0.8 mg/m2 (maximum 1.5 mg) bid everolimus as dispersible tablets in water. Serial trough concentrations over the first week and a steady-state pharmacokinetic profile on day 7 posttransplant were collected in 19 patients ranging from ages 2 to 16 years old. The bioavailability of everolimus from the dispersible tablet was 10% lower relative to the conventional tablet, with a ratio (90% confidence interval) of 0.90 (0.76-1.07). After a high-fat meal, tmax was delayed by a median 2.5 hours, and Cmax was reduced by 50%. Overall absorption, however, was not affected by food inasmuch as the fed/fasting AUC ratio was 0.99 (0.83-1.17). In pediatric patients, steady state was reached between days 3 and 5. The corresponding steady-state parameters were as follows: Cmin, 4.4 +/- 1.7 ng/ml; Cmax, 13.6 +/- 4.2 ng/ml; and AUC, 87 +/- 27 ng.h/ml. Steady-state concentration-time profiles in pediatric transplant patients receiving the dispersible tablet were comparable to those of adult patients receiving the conventional tablet when both were dosed to yield similar trough concentrations. If a pediatric patient is converted from the everolimus dispersible tablet to the conventional tablet, this should be based on a 1:1 milligram switch with subsequent therapeutic drug monitoring to further individualize the dose as needed. The dispersible tablet formulation should be taken consistently either with or without food to minimize fluctuations in exposure over time.     

The effect of a high-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of the immunosuppressant sirolimus (rapamycin)

The bioavailability of an oral nonaqueous solution of sirolimus was compared under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal in a randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study. Healthy volunteers were administered a 15 mg single dose of sirolimus on two occasions, once while fasting and once after consumption of a high-fat breakfast. Whole blood concentrations of sirolimus were assayed by using a validated method with high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric detection. Sirolimus was absorbed more slowly when administered after a high-fat meal than when administered after fasting, as shown by statistically significant reductions in peak concentration (Cmax) and the ratio of Cmax to the area under the curve (AUC), and lengthening of the time to peak concentration. The oral availability of sirolimus was increased to a modest extent (35%) and in a uniform manner when administered with a high-fat meal; the geometric mean ratio of the fed/fasting AUC values was 1.35, with a 90% confidence interval of 1.26 to 1.46. Food had no effect on the terminal half-life of sirolimus (mean values of 67 to 68 hours). The 35% increase in AUC obtained after a high-fat meal appears small relative to the intersubject and intrasubject variabilities observed in clinical trials. However, to minimize unnecessary fluctuations in trough whole blood sirolimus concentrations, it is advisable that sirolimus be administered consistently in individual patients, either with or without meals.     

Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of food and timing of meals on the bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads. Four different independent, open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover studies were conducted in healthy subjects (n = 20-30). Didanosine (400 mg) was given concomitantly with a high-fat meal, light meal, yogurt, and applesauce. In addition, didanosine was given 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 hours before and 2 hours after a light meal. Statistical comparison with fasting conditions was made using the equivalence approach for Cmax (70%-143%) and AUC (80%-125%). The high-fat meal, light meal, yogurt, and applesauce decreased the Cmax by 46%, 22%, 30%, and 24%, respectively, and lowered the AUC by 19%, 27%, 20%, and 18%, respectively; statistical analyses indicated an indeterminate food effect, except for the Cmax for the high-fat meal. For 1 hour before meal, Cmax and AUC were lower by 15% and 24% and, for 2 hours after meal, were lower by 15% and 10%, respectively. There was an indeterminate food effect for 1 hour before the meal treatment; in addition, 2 hours after the meal, treatment approached statistical equivalence, missing narrowly on the lower bounds. For 1.5, 2, and 3 hours before meal treatments, Cmax values were unchanged, but AUC was lower by 10%, 4%, and 0%, respectively; lack of food effect was observed for all three treatments. Across studies, median time to Cmix ranged from 1.67 to 2.67 hours but was delayed by 2.5 to 3 hours with high-fat and light meals compared to fasting conditions. The half-life of didanosine was 1.5 to 2 hours. It was concluded that the bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads was reduced by approximately 20% to 25% with food, which can be circumvented by taking didanosine on an empty stomach. The clinical significance of such moderate reductions in didanosine exposure with food, especially as part of a highly active antiretroviral therapy, is not clear.     

Influence of food on the oral bioavailability of deramciclane from film-coated tablet in healthy male volunteers.

The effect of a high-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of deramciclane 30 mg tablet was evaluated in 18 healthy male volunteers in a randomised, single dose, two-way crossover study. The drug was administered following an overnight fast or a standardised high-fat breakfast. The plasma concentrations of deramciclane and N-desmethylderamciclane were determined by using a validated HPLC-MS -MS/MS method. An effect of food on the bioavailability was indicated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of geometric means of fed and fasted treatments was not contained in the equivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 for AUC and C(max). The ratios of the mean C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) values of deramciclane were 1.24 (90% CI 1.12-1.38) and 1.31 (90% CI 1.21-1.41) in fed versus fasted subjects, which overlapped but exceeded the equivalence limit. In contrast to the parent compound, the 90% CI of the mean ratios for AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of N-desmethylderamciclane were within the predefined range. The 24 and 31% increase in C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) of deramciclane, respectively, under fed condition is modest and probably has no clinical significance since it is relatively small compared to the inter-individual variability of these parameters.     

Effect of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of a polymer-coated erythromycin particle tablet formulation

The effect of food on the relative bioavailability of an erythromycin particles-in-tablet formulation was studied in 27 healthy volunteers, using a four-way, crossover study design with the following treatments: one or two erythromycin capsules USP (Eryc, Parke-Davis), or one polymer-coated erythromycin particles-in-tablet (PCE, Abbott) administered fasting or with a high-fat meal. Under fasting conditions the erythromycin particles-in-tablet and erythromycin capsule formulations are bioequivalent based on similar tmax and dose-normalized Cmax and AUC values. The rate and extent of absorption from the particles-in-tablet formulation, however, are dramatically reduced following administration with a meal. Mean Cmax and AUC values decreased by 73% and 72%, respectively, and seven subjects had no detectable erythromycin plasma concentrations for 16 hours following administration of the particles-in-tablet formulation with the high-fat meal. Greater than 40% of the subjects had nonfasting Cmax and AUC values that were less than 10% of those values following administration of the dose fasting. Cmax and AUC values in nonfasting subjects were within 75% to 125% of fasting values in only two and one of 27 subjects, respectively. The erythromycin particles-in-tablet formulation therefore should not be administered with meals.     

Comparative effect of different types of food on the bioavailability of cefaclor extended release tablet.

This randomized, six-treatment, six-period, six sequence, single dose, crossover pharmacokinetic study assessed the effect of different types of food on the bioavailability of 500-mg cefaclor extended release tablet in 23 healthy male volunteers. A single dose of cefaclor extended release 500-mg tablet was administered at six occasions: after overnight fasting, after two vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat), two non-vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat) and rice diets. Serial blood samples were collected up to 12 h after dose. Serum cefaclor concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC method. An almost equivalent increase in both Cmax and AUC was observed with both high-fat non-vegetarian and low-fat vegetarian breakfasts. However, when MIC90 values, a pharmacodynamic end-point were compared, the low-fat vegetarian diet fared better than the high-fat non-vegetarian diet. The results obtained favor low-fat vegetarian diet (breakfast) to be taken with cefaclor extended release tablet to achieve maximum benefit in terms of clinical efficacy.     

Abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine as a combined formulation tablet: bioequivalence compared with each component administered concurrently and the effect of food on absorption

A single-center, open-label, three-way crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects to assess (1) the bioequivalence of a combined abacavir 300 mg/lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg (A/L/Z) combination tablet relative to the separate brand-name components administered simultaneously and (2) the effect of food on the bioavailability of the drugs from the combination tablet. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive each of the following three treatments, separated by a 2-day washout period: one A/L/Z combination tablet after an overnight fast, one abacavir 300 mg tablet + one lamivudine 150 mg tablet + one zidovudine 300 mg tablet sequentially after an overnight fast, or one A/L/Z combination tablet 5 minutes after completing a standardized high-fat breakfast (67 g fat, 58 g carbohydrate, and 33 g protein). Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdose for determination of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine serum concentrations. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Treatments were considered bioequivalent if 90% confidence intervals (CI) for geometric least squares (GLS) mean ratios for abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(infinity)) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) fell entirely within 0.80 to 1.25 for log-transformed parameters. The combined A/L/Z tablet was bioequivalent in the extent (AUC) and rate of absorption (Cmax and time of Cmax [tmax]) to the individual brand-name drug components administered concurrently under fasted conditions. GLS ratios and 90% CI for AUC(infinity) and Cmax were 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) and 1.00 (0.90, 1.11), respectively, for abacavir; 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) and 0.90 (0.84, 0.99), respectively, for lamivudine; and 0.95 (0.89, 1.02) and 0.96 (0.80, 1.15), respectively, for zidovudine. The extent of absorption of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine from the combination tablet was not altered by administration with meals, indicating that this formulation may be administered with or without food. However, food slowed the rate of absorption, delayed the tmax, and reduced the Cmax of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine. These changes, which were consistent with those observed with the individual reference formulations when administered with food, were not considered clinically important. All formulations were well tolerated underfasted and fed conditions.     

Oxcarbazepine final market image tablet formulation bioequivalence study after single administration and at steady state in healthy subjects

A final market image (FMI) tablet formulation of oxcarbazepine was compared with the marketed formulation (current market formulation (CMF)) and with the clinical trial formulation (CTF) tablet used during clinical efficacy and safety studies. The goal of the study was to compare the bioavailability after single doses and at steady state of the FMI versus CMF and CTF as well. Additionally, the effect of food was evaluated on the final market formulation. The study was an open-label, single-center, 4-way crossover trial. Each treatment period consisted of a single dose of 600 mg OXC on Day 1. From Day 4 up to including Day 7, 600 mg b.i.d. were administered. A final dose of 600 mg was administered in the morning on Day 8. Blood samples were taken on Day 1 before and on Day 7 (predose) and on Day 8 (morning dose). Plasma concentrations of MHD (the main metabolite of OXC) were determined by using a validated HPLC assay. FMI as test formulation was compared with the CMF and CTF as reference formulations. FMI under fed conditions was also compared with FMI under fasting conditions. These comparisons were made using data following single-dose administration and steady state conditions. Plasma AUC for single dose or AUC(0-12h) for steady state, and plasma Cmax, log-transformed (natural base), were used for the assessment of bioequivalence. The 90% confidence interval (CI) approach was used for testing bioequivalence. Bioequivalence was accepted if the CI was contained within the region (0.8, 1.25). At steady state under fed conditions, tested formulation (FMI) was bioequivalent to CTF and with the reference marketed formulation (CMF) with regard to AUC and Cmax. After single dose under fed conditions, FMI and CTF were bioequivalent with regard to AUC and Cmax, and FMI and CMF were equivalent with regard to AUC but not Cmax. Food had no effect on the bioavailability of the FMI. These results clearly support the switch from the current market formulation (CMF) to the final market image tablet in the countries where Trileptal is or was already registered.     

Pharmacokinetics and gamma scintigraphy evaluation of two enteric coated formulations of didanosine in healthy volunteers

AIMS: The aims of the study were to evaluate the bioavailability of didanosine from the encapsulated enteric coated beads (1 x 200 mg; enteric beads) and enteric coated mini-tablets (4 x 50 mg; enteric tablet) formulations relative to the chewable/dispersible buffered tablets (2 x 100 mg; buffered tablet), and to study their rate of gastrointestinal transit. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers. A 200 mg dose of didanosine was given in each period and each formulation contained a gamma radiation-emitting isotope. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined were Cmax, tmax, AUC(0, infinity ) and t1/2. Bioequivalence was assessed using the confidence interval (CI) of 0.80, 1.25 for Cmax and AUC(0, infinity ). Scintigraphic images were recorded and gastrointestinal transit profiles were generated. RESULTS: The point estimate and 90% CI of the ratio of Cmax for the enteric beads and enteric tablet relative to the buffered tablet was 0.71 (0.59, 0.85) and 0.55 (0.46, 0.66), respectively. The tmax was significantly different for the enteric beads (median, 1.33 h) and the enteric tablet (median, 2.83 h) than for the buffered tablet (median, 0.67 h). The AUC(0, infinity ) satisfied the bioequivalence criteria, and the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratio were 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) and 0.92 (0.82, 1.04) for the enteric beads and enteric tablet, respectively. The AUC(0, infinity ) values appeared to be less variable with the enteric beads (% CV = 19%) than with the enteric tablet (% CV = 33%). The t1/2 values were not significantly different between formulations, and the mean values ranged from 1.82 to 1.92 h. Inspection of the individual scintigraphy profiles and concentration-time curves suggested that didanosine was absorbed throughout the small intestine. Gastrointestinal transit parameters were higher for both enteric formulations than for the buffered tablet, indicating slower transit of the enteric formulations. Between the enteric formulations, gastric emptying was slower for the enteric beads than for the enteric tablet; however, plasma didanosine concentrations were observed sooner for the enteric beads, suggesting that the enteric coat for the beads dissolved more rapidly. CONCLUSIONS: The enteric beads and enteric tablet formulations of didanosine were equivalent to the buffered tablet in their extent of absorption. Although the gastric emptying of the enteric tablet was faster, based on the rapid uncoating and the lower variability in AUC, the enteric beads were chosen for further clinical development.     

Bioequivalence assessment of Lovrak (Julphar, UAE) compared with Zovirax (Glaxo Wellcome, UK)--Two brands of Acyclovir--in healthy human volunteers

Two studies were performed to assess the relative bioavailability of Lovrak (Julphar, UAE) compared with Zovirax (Glaxo Wellcome, UK) at the International Pharmaceutical Research Center (IPRC), Amman, Jordan. One study involved acyclovir tablets and the other acyclovir suspension. Each study enrolled 24 volunteers and in both studies, after an overnight fasting, the two brands of acyclovir were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by 1 week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 16 h. Plasma harvested from blood, was analysed for acyclovir by an HPLC method with UV detection. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Tmax, T1/2 and Kelm were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with the reported values. AUC0-t, AUC(0-proportional to), and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of these parameters were found within the bioequivalence acceptance range 80%-125%. Based on these statistical inferences it was concluded that a Lovrak tablet is bioequivalent to a Zovirax tablet and that Lovrak suspension is bioequivalent to Zovirax suspension.     

The effect of four different types of diet on the bioavailability of loracarbef.

This randomized open-label single-dose crossover pharmacokinetic study was carried out to assess the effect of different diets on the bioavailability of loracarbef in 24 healthy male volunteers. A single dose of loracarbef in 200-mg tablet form was administered at 5 different times: after overnight fasting, after two vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat) diets, and following two non-vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat) diets. Serial blood samples were collected up to 10 h post-dose. Serum loracarbef concentrations were determined by a validated high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method. Area under curve (AUC) values were significantly affected only by non-vegetarian diets; however the time to reach maximum serum concentration (Tmax) was prolonged and the maximum serum concentration (Cmax was decreased by all types of meals. The non-vegetarian diets affected the rate of absorption of loracarbef more than the vegetarian diets. The lowest decrease in Cmax was produced by the high-fat vegetarian diet, while the maximum was produced by the low-fat non-vegetarian diet. The results of this study indicate that while the rate of loracarbef absorption is significantly decreased by all diets, the extent of absorption is only reduced significantly by the non-vegetarian diets. The rate of elimination (k(el)) was not found to be significantly decreased by any of the diets. As compared to the high-fat non-vegetarian diet, the time beyond minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) concentration was significantly increased by the high-fat vegetarian diet. The implications of these findings for the large Indian vegetarian population are considerable.     

Influence of food intake and formulation on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism as well as the relative bioavailability of bosentan. Sixteen healthy male subjects were treated in a randomized, four-way, crossover design with single oral doses of 125 mg bosentan, given as one tablet (with or without food), two tablets of 62.5 mg (with food), and a suspension (without food). The pharmacokinetic parameters of bosentan (and also three of its metabolites) were very similar after the four treatments: geometric means for Cmax and AUC0-infinity, ranged from 1.3 to 1.6 microg/ml and from 7.8 to 8.9 microg x h/ml, respectively, and median t(max) from 3.0 to 4.0 hours. The bioavailability of the 125 mg tablet relative to that of the suspension, both given fasted, was 102%. In the presence of food, Cmax and AUC0-max increased by 22% and 10%, respectively, whereas the two 62.5 mg tablets were bioequivalent to the 125mg tablet, both under fed conditions. The pharmacokinetics of the metabolites was independent of the treatment administered. In conclusion, bosentan bioavailability from the newly developed 125 mg tablet formulation is similar to that of the suspension, and food intake does not influence its pharmacokinetics to a clinically relevant extent.     

法莫替丁口溶片的药代动力学及生物利用度

目的研究法莫替丁口溶片在家兔体内的药代动力学过程和生物利用度。方法家兔单剂量服用法莫替丁口溶片和法莫替丁普通市售片后,用高效液相色谱法测定血药浓度。结果法莫替丁口溶片和普通市售片的AUC分别为(2687.63±461.65)和(1477.65±484.28)(ng