Feasibility of diabetes peer education for Turkish type 2 diabetes patients in Dutch general practice

The feasibility of a 9-month educational diabetes programme (tailored to Turkish patients, provided by Turkish bicultural female educators) was assessed in terms of dropout rate, patient and GP satisfaction, and GP's perceived workload. Of the 54 Turkish patients (39% males) that signed informed consent, 45 actually started the education. Dropout rate during the programme was 41% (main reason: going abroad for a long period (18%)). The individual education sessions and the consultations with the GP were highly appreciated by 87% of the patients and the group sessions by 66%. Although all nine interviewed GPs experienced a higher workload, overall appreciation of the programme was high in six GPs. Although implementation of an ethic-specific diabetes programme in general practice is well appreciated by both patients and GPs, the high dropout rate indicates that the programme needs to be more finely tuned to the individual patient.     

Acquisition of clinical skills in postgraduate training for general practice.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate training in general practice aims to develop clinical competence. However, little is known about its effect on trainees' development of clinical skills. AIM: To assess the acquisition of clinical skills during a 3-year training programme and to evaluate whether a satisfactory level is achieved towards the end of training. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Dutch postgraduate training in general practice from 1995 to 1998. METHOD: Clinical skills were assessed using a written knowledge test of skills and by an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The written test was administered to trainees in all 3 years. Trainees at completion of their training took the OSCE. The results of both tests were compared with a standard of adequacy and to a reference group of general practitioner (GP) trainers. RESULTS: An increase in the level of clinical skills and pass rate was found throughout the training, being most prominent during the first 6 months. At completion of their training, trainees scored higher than the GPs on the written test (48% versus 39%) and on the OSCE (69% versus 63%). Eighty-eight per cent of the trainees would have passed the written test against 70% of the GPs and 94% would have passed the OSCE against 80% of the GPs. CONCLUSION: A 3-year postgraduate training period in general practice contributes to a satisfactory acquisition of clinical skills. Further research into when and where acquisition takes place, and the role of the GP trainer, is needed.     

Views of newly-qualified GPs about their training and preparedness: lessons for extended generalist training

BackgroundGeneral practice is becoming increasingly complex due to an ageing population with multiple morbidities and the shift of services from secondary to primary care, yet GP training remains largely the same. Extended training is now recommended, initially proposed as a fourth GP specialty trainee year, but more recently as a broad-based 4-year specialty training programme.AimTo explore the views of newly-qualified GPs about their training and preparedness for specific aspects of the GP’s role.MethodSemi-structured interviews with 18 GPs between November 2011 and April 2012.ResultsGaining experience in a variety of primary care environments widens insight into patient populations as well as helping GPs develop adaptability and confidence, although this is not routinely part of GP training. However, alongside variety, having continuity with patients in practice remains important. Opportunities to be involved in the management of a practice or to take on substantial leadership roles also vary widely and this may limit preparedness and development of generalist skills.ConclusionExtended training could help prepare GPs for the current challenges of general practice. It could ensure all trainees are exposed to a greater variety of primary care settings including those outside GP practice, as well as experience of business, finance, and leadership roles. Collectively, these changes have the potential to produce GPs with both generalist and enhanced skills, who are better prepared to work collaboratively across the organisational boundaries between primary, secondary, and community care.     

Is the promotion of physical activity in vulnerable older people feasible and effective in general practice?

There is convincing evidence about the benefits of exercise training in community dwelling frailer older people, but little evidence that this intervention can be delivered in general practice. In this prospective cohort study in 14 general practices in north London we assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of a tailored exercise referral programme for frail elderly patients delivered within a variety of inner city primary care settings. One hundred and twenty-six women and 32 men aged 75 years and older, deemed borderline frail by their GPs, took part in a two-phase progressive exercise programme (Stage 1--primary care setting; Stage II--leisure/community centre setting) using the Timed Up And Go (TUG) test as the primary outcome measure. Baseline TUG measures confirmed that the participants were borderline frail and that GP selection was accurate. Of those referred by their GP or practice nurse 89% took up the exercise programme; 73% completed Stage I and 63% made the transition to the community Stage II programme. TUG improved in Stage I with a mean difference of 3.5 seconds (P<0.001). An individually tailored progressive exercise programme following GP referral, delivered in weekly group sessions by specialist exercise instructors within general practices, was effective in achieving participation in exercise sessions and in improving TUG values in a significant number of frailer older citizens.     

Predictors of the provision of intrapartum care by general practitioners: five-year cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is little published evidence that any aspect of vocational training for general practice improves the quality of care provided by general practitioners (GPs). AIM: To investigate whether aspects of education and vocational training predict whether GPs provide intrapartum care. METHOD: A five-year prospective cohort study was carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) using responders to a 1990 national survey of GPs for whom a current UK address could be found. Main outcome measures were factors associated with provision of GP intrapartum care in 1995. RESULTS: In 1995, a minority of ex-trainees (65 out of 349, 18%) provided intrapartum care as GPs, although 28% would ideally have wished to do so; 8% provided home delivery care. Four education and training variables were associated with ex-trainees booking women for GP delivery in 1995: the number of partners in the ex-trainee's GP training practice providing GP intrapartum care (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30); performing forceps deliveries as an obstetric senior house officer (SHO) (OR = 1.24), witnessing episiotomies as a student (OR = 1.17), and witnessing twin deliveries as a student (OR = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of GP intrapartum care, future service provision is associated with certain education and training variables. There is a mismatch between GPs' ideal and actual maternity care provision. Changes to enhance such care would be needed at least at three levels: selection and approval of training practices, content and base for SHO posts, and practice arrangements for maternity cover.     

A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Providing doctors with new research findings or clinical guidelines is rarely sufficient to promote changes in clinical practice. An implementation strategy is required to provide clinicians with the skills and encouragement needed to alter established routines. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different training and support strategies in promoting implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention (SBI) by general practitioners (GPs). METHOD: Subjects were 128 GPs, one per practice, from the former Northern and Yorkshire Regional Health Authority, who agreed to use the 'Drink-Less' SBI programme in an earlier dissemination trial. GPs were stratified by previous marketing conditions and randomly allocated to three intensities of training and support: controls (n = 43) received the programme with written guidelines only, trained GPs (n = 43) received the programme plus practice-based training in programme usage, trained and supported GPs (n = 42) received the programme plus practice-based training and a support telephone call every two weeks. GPs were requested to use the programme for three months. Outcome measures included proportions of GPs implementing the programme and numbers of patients screened and intervened with. RESULTS: Seventy-three (57%) GPs implemented the programme and screened 11,007 patients for risk drinking. Trained and supported GPs were significantly more likely to implement the programme (71%) than controls (44%) or trained GPs (56%); they also screened, and intervened with, significantly more patients. Costs per patient screened were: trained and supported GPs, 1.05 Pounds; trained GPs, 1.08 Pounds; and controls, 1.47 Pounds. Costs per patient intervened with were: trained and supported GPs, 5.43 Pounds; trained GPs, 6.02 Pounds; and controls, 8.19 Pounds. CONCLUSION: Practice-based training plus support telephone calls was the most effective and cost-effective strategy to encourage implementation of SBI by GPs.     

Diagnosis of somatisation: effect of an educational intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Somatisation is highly prevalent in primary care (present in 25% of visiting patients) but often goes unrecognised. Non-recognition may lead to ineffective treatment, risk of iatrogenic harm, and excessive use of healthcare services. AIM: To examine the effect of training on diagnosis of somatisation in routine clinical practice by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN OF STUDY: Cluster randomised controlled trial, with practices as the randomisation unit. SETTING: Twenty-seven general practices (with a total of 43 GPs) in Vejle County, Denmark. METHOD: Intervention consisted of a multifaceted training programme (the TERM [The Extended Reattribution and Management] model). Patients were enrolled consecutively over a period of 13 working days. Psychiatric morbidity was assessed by means of a screening questionnaire. GPs categorised their diagnoses in another questionnaire. The primary outcome was GP diagnosis of somatisation and agreement with the screening questionnaire. RESULTS: GPs diagnosed somatisation less frequently than had previously been observed, but there was substantial variation between GPs. The difference between groups in the number of diagnoses of somatisation failed to reach the 5% significance (P = 0.094). However, the rate of diagnoses of medically unexplained physical symptoms was twice as high in the intervention group as in the control group (7.7% and 3.9%, respectively, P = 0.007). Examination of the agreement between GPs' diagnoses and the screening questionnaire revealed no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Brief training increased GPs' awareness of medically unexplained physical symptoms. Diagnostic accuracy according to a screening questionnaire remained unaffected but was difficult to evaluate, as there is no agreement on a gold standard for somatisation in general practice.     

Provision of smoking cessation counseling by general practitioners assisted by training and screening procedure

OBJECTIVE: To examine which counseling behavior among GPs can be achieved after counseling training when organizational support is provided. METHODS: A random sample of 39 general practices was drawn, 34 took part. GPs received a pre-study assessment followed by a training session for smoking counseling. All patients showing up during a period of 1 week were asked about smoking status. Current smokers, aged 18-70 years were eligible (N=551), 81.8% participated. A documentation sheet, filled in by a study nurse transferred smoking-related information about patient to the GP. GPs were advised to fill in a post-counseling assessment for every patient. A post-study assessment with the GPs was conducted. RESULTS: Frequent barriers for smoking counseling were lack of time and the assumption that patients were not motivated to quit. The GP's documented smoking counseling in 96.0%. The patients (87.8%) could be thoroughly counseled. Younger age of the GP, a high number of patients and the contemplation stage quitting smoking were predictors for realizing counseling. 79.3% of the GPs assessed the procedure to be practicable. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking counseling in the general practice is feasible. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Involving staff in the screening procedure may support counseling activity of the GP.     

Effects on depression pharmacotherapy of a Dutch general practitioner training program

BACKGROUND: General practitioners' (GPs) ability to recognize, diagnose and treat depression improved significantly after a comprehensive, 20-h training programme. This study aims to evaluate in more detail the effects of the training on GPs' pharmacotherapy of depression and related issues. METHODS: A pretest-posttest design was used. Both in the pre- and post-training phase, a sample was drawn from consecutive patients of the 17 participating GPs. In the pre-training phase we identified a sample of 31 cases with an ICD-10 depression who received an antidepressant from their GP. The sample was followed for 1 year. Outcome measures were: type of antidepressant, dosage, duration and number of target instructions given by the GP. Then we trained the GPs. In the post-training phase, we identified a new sample (n = 47) from their practices and measured the same outcomes. RESULTS: Improvements were seen in choice for modern antidepressant, adequate dosage, adequate duration, and number of target instructions given. LIMITATIONS: Observed changes can be due to a period effect, inherent in a pre-post design. CONCLUSIONS: A post-academic hands-on training of GPs can improve depression pharmacotherapy according to clinical guidelines with respect to choice of a modern antidepressant, adequate dosage, adequate duration and psychoeducation.     

The impact of training in problem-based interviewing on the detection and management of psychological problems presenting in primary care.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of mental health problems present to primary care teams. However, rates of under-diagnosis remain worryingly high. This study explores a GP-centred approach to these issues. AIM: To examine the impact of training in problem-based interviewing (BPI) on the detection and management of psychological problems in primary care. METHOD: The detection and management of psychological problems by 10 general practitioners (GPs) who had received PBI training 12 months earlier was compared with that of 10 control GPs matched for age, sex, clinical experience, and practice setting; and had originally applied for, but had not been able to attend, BPI training. Consecutive attendees at one randomly selected surgery undertaken by each GP were invited to participate in the study. Two hundred and eighty patients living in Newcastle upon Tyne met inclusion criteria and gave informed consent. The presence or absence of psychological problems was assessed using patient self-ratings on the 28-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and blind independent observer ratings of the brief Present State Examination (PSE). Patient satisfaction with interviews was rated using the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS). After each consultation, the GPs (blind to subjective and observer ratings) recorded their assessment and management of the patients' problems on a Practice Activity Card (PAC). RESULTS: In comparison with control GPs, index GPs demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity in the detection of psychological problems in the GHQ-PAC ratings. The absolute decrease in misdiagnosis of GHQ cases was 9% and of PSE cases was 15%. Patients meeting GHQ criteria for caseness were more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication by an index GP than compared with a control GP. Length of interview did not differ between the groups and mean scores on the MISS suggested that patients attending PBI-trained GPs, compared with control GPs, were as satisfied or slightly more satisfied with their consultation. CONCLUSION: In comparison with control GPs, PBI-trained GPs were better at recognizing and managing psychological disorders. The potential benefits of BPI training are discussed in light of other attempts to improve mental health skills in primary care.     

Evaluation of general practitioners' training: how to manage patients with unexplained physical symptoms

Patients with unexplained physical symptoms ("somatoform disorders") tend to overuse the healthcare system. Therefore, the authors aimed to assess whether a training session for general practitioners (GPs) on managing patients with unexplained physical symptoms would be acceptable to GPs and lead to improvements in patient care. In a randomized clinical trial (GPs randomized), GPs got a 1-day training session and additional materials. Included were 26 GP offices in primary care and 295 patients with unexplained physical symptoms (minimum of two symptoms required). Outcome measures were healthcare utilization (number of doctor visits) 6 months before and 6 months after the index visit to the GP, somatization severity, depression, and hypochondriacal fears at the index visit to the GP's office and 6 months later. Training GPs to manage these patients led to significant reductions in healthcare utilization; patients of untrained GPs showed comparable attendance rates in the 6 months before and after the index visit. Differences in depression, somatization, and hypochondriacal fears, however, could not be attributed to the GP training. GPs rated the training as being highly relevant for their everyday practices, underlining the need for and acceptance of the training. Training GPs in managing patients with unexplained physical symptoms seems to be helpful for the reduction of excessive healthcare utilization. These 1-day workshops have high acceptability, so this approach could be a good model for empirically-validated continuing-education programs.     

Clinical empathy in GP-training: Experiences and needs among Dutch GP-trainees. “Empathy as an element of personal growth”

ObjectiveClinical empathy has been described as a key component of effective person-centeredness in patient-physician communication. Yet little is known about general practitioner (GP) trainees’ experiences and opinions regarding clinical empathy, empathy-education and the development of empathic skills. This study aimed to explore trainees’ experiences with clinical empathy during GP training.MethodsThis study used focus group interviews. GP trainees at two Dutch universities were approached by e-mail. Focus groups were conducted between April and November 2018. Six focus groups were conducted: two with starting trainees, two with trainees at the end of their first year and two with trainees at the end of their 3 years’ training. Two experienced qualitative researchers analyzed the focus groups. During the thematic analysis the differences and similarities between the various stages of education were taken into account and a framework for the identified themes and subthemes was developed.ResultsThirty-five GP trainees took part. Four main themes could be identified. Starting trainees experienced frictions regarding the influence of personal affective reactions on their medical competencies. Trainees at the end of their first year indicated that they reached a balance between empathic involvement and their responsibility to carry out relevant medical tasks, such as following GP guidelines. Trainees at the end of their three years’ training recognized the mutual relationship between the development of the behavioral part of clinical empathy and personal growth. All trainees stated that their needs concerning education changed during their GP training and proposed changes to the curriculum.ConclusionsGP trainees face various obstacles in developing empathic skills and behavior. Particularly they mention handling personal affective reactions. Trainees express a clear wish for clinical empathy, in its theoretical as well as its skill and emotional aspects, to play a central role in the curriculum.Practice implicationsMore explicit attention to be paid to empathy by embedding theoretical education, explicit attention to skill training and assessment of empathic behavior by patients and supervisors     

Developing a curriculum statement based on clinical practice: genetics in primary care

Background

Advances in medical genetics are increasingly being incorporated into clinical management outside specialist genetic services. This study was therefore undertaken to develop learning outcomes in genetics for general practice specialty training, using methods to ensure the knowledge, skills, and attitudes relevant to genetics in primary care were identified.

Aim

To identify key knowledge, skills, and attitudes in genetics and to synthesise these into learning outcomes to assist training in genetics for primary care.

Design of study

Delphi survey and review by expert group.

Setting

Primary care practices and Regional Genetics Centre in the West Midlands region of the UK.

Method

A modified Delphi survey involved GP trainers, programme directors, and geneticists (n = 60). The results, along with results from a survey of GP registrars, were reviewed by an expert group, which included GPs, geneticists, and educationalists.

Results

Core genetics topics for GPs were identified, prioritised, and developed into competency statements in the style of the curriculum structure of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

Conclusion

The development of the GP curriculum statement Genetics in Primary Care was based on a study of educational needs, incorporating the views of practitioners (GP trainers, programme directors, and registrars) and specialists (clinical geneticists). This inclusive approach has enabled the identification of learning outcomes which directly reflect clinical practice.     

Diagnostic ultrasound: a primary care-led service?

BACKGROUND: A training programme has been proposed for general practitioners (GPs) to perform ultrasound in primary care. This has generated considerable concern among radiologists as to the adequacy and appropriateness of such training. AIM: To assess the current provision of ultrasound services to primary care in the former Northern health region of England, the level of interest among GPs in undertaking recommended training, and the willingness or ability of radiology departments to provide it. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were sent to GPs (n = 334), their practice managers (n = 281) and all clinical directors/heads of radiology departments (n = 19) in the region. RESULTS: Altogether, 67% of GPs, 59% of practice managers, and 68% of radiologists returned questionnaires. Overall, 48% of GPs have open access to obstetric/gynaecological ultrasound compared with 77% for general diagnostic requests. A total of 73% of GPs would prefer an open access service and 15% a practice-based service. Some 48% of GPs were not interested, 36% moderately interested, and 16% very interested in participating in the training programme. Only two out of 13 radiology, departments were willing to provide such training. CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations from the Royal College of General Practitioners, around half the respondents in this survey do not have direct access to ultrasound for obstetric referrals, and a quarter for non-obstetric referrals. Interest shown by GPs in a primary care-led service is not mirrored by their radiology colleagues. Open access to ultrasound was considered the optimum service, suggesting that resources be targeted at improving hospital services rather than transferring facilities to primary care.     

Why do general practitioners from France choose to work in London practices? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Growing concerns about the ability to maintain and increase the general practitioner (GP) workforce has led to active recruitment of GPs from overseas. However, little is known about why these GPs choose to leave their countries and come to work in London. AIM: To investigate the motivations and expectations of French GPs migrating to work in general practices in London. Design of study: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: General practice induction programme in southeast London. METHOD: Individual interviews with 31 French GPs, who attended an induction programme for international recruits, were taped, transcribed, and analysed using a categorical approach. RESULTS: Three factors led to the process of migration: instigating factors, creating the stimulus for migration; activating factors, based on the perception that English general practice offered greater opportunities; and facilitating factors, which make migration possible. Particular emphasis was placed on personal and professional instigating factors, with a desire for new cultural experiences and a widespread discontent surrounding the infrastructure of French general practice, playing crucial roles in the stimulus to migrate. Ease of travel and a paid induction programme facilitated the move to their chosen destination. CONCLUSION: French GPs' decisions were part of a process of migration influenced by a series of integrated factors. Consideration of these factors will not only enhance recruitment to English general practice, but will also facilitate foreign GPs' transition to work in the National Health Service (NHS) and, ultimately, maximise their retention.     

GPs' views on transfer of information about terminally ill patients to the out-of-hours co-operative

Background  

In the Netherlands, the increase in of out-of-hours care that is provided by GP co-operatives is challenging the continuity of care for the terminally ill in general practice. Aim of this study is to investigate the views of general practitioners (GPs) on the transfer of information about terminally ill patients to the GP co-operatives. GPs were asked to give their view from two different perspectives: as a GP in their daily practice and as a locum in the GP co-operative.     

General practitioner turnover and migration in England 1990-94.

BACKGROUND: In tandem with fears about a GP workforce crisis, increasing attention is being focused on the supply and distribution of primary care services: on general practitioners in particular. Differential turnover and migration across health authority boundaries could lead to a maldistribution of GPs, yet comprehensive studies of GP turnover are non-existent. AIM: To quantify general practitioner (GP) turnover and migration in England from 1990 to 1994. METHOD: Yearly data from 1 October 1990 to 1 October 1994 were collected on GPs in England practising full time, including average yearly turnover, rates of entry to and exit from general practice, and net migration among GPs. All were calculated at the family health service authority (now the new health authorities) level. RESULTS: Average yearly GP turnover ranges from 2.9% in Shropshire to 7.8% in Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster; turnover is associated with deprivation and high-need areas. Migration of GPs across health authority borders was rare. Entry and exit rates were also positively related to measures of deprivation and need. Relatively underprovided health authorities lost 23 GPs over the study period as a result of migration; relatively overprovided ones gained three. CONCLUSION: Turnover is driven primarily by exits from general practice and is related to deprivation and high need. Retention appears to be the main problem in ensuring an adequate GP supply in relatively deprived and underprovided health authorities.     

How common is medical training in palliative care? A postal survey of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have a central role in palliative care, yet research continues to reveal room for improvement in symptom control at home. There is a need to evaluate how well-prepared GPs are for this task of caring for the dying at home. AIM: To evaluate the training in palliative care GPs have received throughout their careers. METHOD: Postal survey of 450 randomly selected East Anglian GP principals, investigating training in five areas of palliative care (pain control, control of other symptoms, communication skills, bereavement care, use of syringe driver), as clinical students, junior hospital doctors, GP trainees (registrars), and GP principals. RESULTS: A response rate of 86.7% was obtained. While GPs were clinical students, training was uncommon, (32% reported no training in pain control, and 58% no training in bereavement care), although there has been a significant increase in more recent years. Training as junior doctors was particularly uncommon (over 70% report no training in communication skills or bereavement care); there was some evidence of an increase in more recent years. During the GP trainee year, training was much more common. For GP principals, most areas had been covered, although over 20% reported no training in communication skills and bereavement care. During the community-based years as trainee and principal, training was significantly more common than during the hospital-based years of training as clinical student and junior doctor. CONCLUSIONS: There is a continuing need for medical education in palliative care. Particular attention should be paid to the basic medical education of clinical students and the training of junior doctors, especially regarding communication skills and bereavement care.