Vigabatrin for infantile spasms

Infantile spasms describe a pediatric epilepsy syndrome characterized by frequent clusters of brief symmetric muscle contractions; the condition is often associated with developmental delay. When infantile spasms are accompanied by hypsarrhythmia on electroencephalogram, the condition is labeled West syndrome. The mainstay of treatment for infantile spasms is adrenocorticotropic hormone; however, vigabatrin, a vinyl derivative of γ-aminobutyric acid, has been used for the treatment of infantile spasms in Europe since 1989. In 2009, vigabatrin was approved by the United States Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) for use as monotherapy in the treatment of infantile spasms in patients aged 1 month-2 years when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks. Results from numerous trials examining the role of vigabatrin in infantile spasms have been published; many of these trials were small, open-label, or noncontrolled. Although clinical trials have provided some insight into the utility of vigabatrin for the treatment of infantile spasms, these studies have notable limitations. In addition, vigabatrin is associated with a black-box warning that describes the potential for permanent bilateral concentric visual field defects. Currently, vigabatrin is available through a manufacturer-sponsored program in accordance with its FDA-approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy. Although several guidelines recommend vigabatrin as a first-line therapy for infantile spasms, specifically infantile spasms related to tuberous sclerosis, it is still unclear whether vigabatrin should supersede hormone therapy as first-line therapy. Further research comparing the two therapies is needed.     

A risk-benefit assessment of treatments for infantile spasms.

Infantile spasms are a devastating epileptic encephalopathy of the young child. The continuing spasms and hypsarrhythmia have a deleterious effect on brain maturation and further cognitive development. Corticotropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone) or corticosteroids have been the gold standard treatment for the last 40 years, but there is little agreement on the best agent to use, or the dosage and duration of the treatment. Despite this empirical approach, corticotropin or corticosteroids are effective in controlling spasms and normalising electroencephalograms in about 60% of cases. The major concern with this treatment is the occurrence of frequent and severe adverse effects. The introduction of vigabatrin in the 1990s improved the outcome of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin shows an efficacy at least equal to that of corticosteroids, and even higher in specific groups such as those with tuberous sclerosis. The major advantages of vigabatrin are the ability to initiate treatment at the full dosage. rapid efficacy, suitability for outpatient treatment and particularly good tolerability with only minor adverse effects. Recently, however, the safety of vigabatrin has caused concern since a specific visual field loss has been reported in treated adults. The current problem is determining the risk-benefit ratio of vigabatrin and corticosteroids/corticotropin in children with infantile spasms, and to specify the groups where their use could be optimal. Visual field loss is usually asymptomatic and can be detected only by perimetric visual field studies. In children, especially in the young or disabled, it is difficult if not impossible to detect the visual field loss and it is not yet known if children are at higher or lower risk for this adverse effect. Until a clear answer about the occurrence of this adverse effect in children has been established through randomised study, vigabatrin may still be considered first-line therapy in infantile spasms. Children who do not achieve a good response to vigabatrin should be switched to corticotropin/corticosteroid therapy. Despite the efficacy of corticosteroids and vigabatrin, the use of the conventional antiepileptic drugs, the newly developed antiepileptic drugs and some promising results with ketogenic diet, 25 to 30% of patients with infantile spasms continue to have spasms and experience psychomotor regression. These drug-resistant patients could be candidates for surgery.     

Newer GABAergic agents for pharmacotherapy of infantile spasms

Infantile spasms is an age-specific epileptic syndrome in infants and young children. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) has been the mainstay for the therapeutic management of infantile spasms and other developmental epilepsies. Clinical benefits of ACTH in infantile spasms could partially relate to its stimulatory effects on the release of adrenocorticosteroids and neurosteroids. Glucocorticoids, pyridoxine and ketogenic diet therapy have all been used for the treatment of refractory infantile spasms. Recent studies indicate that several newer anticonvulsant agents, which are positive allosteric modulators of GABA(A) receptors, are as effective as ACTH in acutely controlling infantile spasms. The efficacy of agents that enhance GABA-mediated inhibition (such as vigabatrin and benzodiazepines) for rapid and complete abolition of infantile spasms has been demonstrated in several clinical studies. Ganaxolone, a novel neuroactive steroid has, however, demonstrated outstanding efficacy and better tolerability in children with intractable infantile spasms. Zonisamide, topiramate, deoxycorticosterone and neurosteroids are emerging as effective treatment approaches. These new antiepileptic drugs represent a potential nonhormonal approach for infantile spasms, but additional studies are needed to verify their efficacy and tolerability. Future studies will hopefully identify rational antiseizure drugs that not only control infantile spasms but also abrogate its risk on the development of the brain.     

Stiripentol

Stiripentol (STP) is a new antiepileptic compound produced by Biocodex. It is not structurally related to any of the other currently marketed antiepileptic products as it belongs to the group of aromatic allylic alcohols. It has recently been proved to increase GABAergic transmission in experimental models. It has been studied and used in France and Canada for > 10 years, but its clinical development was delayed due to the inhibitory effect of STP on hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP). Clinical studies were based on the fact that STP also acts as an inhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 in vivo in epileptic patients. Although the studies in adult patients were disappointing, the trials conducted in paediatric populations demonstrated a specific efficacy of STP in a severe form of early childhood epilepsy, Dravet syndrome (severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy), when combined with valproate and clobazam. Based on these results, STP was granted orphan drug status in the European Union for the treatment of Dravet syndrome. The French experience in compassionate use suggests that STP might also be of benefit when combined with carbamazepine in paediatric patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy. Nevertheless, two controlled adjunctive-therapy trials were recently completed in paediatric populations with epilepsy. The interactions of STP with a large number of drugs need to be carefully taken into account by adjusting the doses of the combined antiepileptic drugs in order to improve the tolerability of the therapeutic association.     

Stiripentol for the treatment of seizures in Dravet syndrome

Introduction: Dravet syndrome is an early childhood-onset epilepsy syndrome characterized by drug-resistant seizures, frequent episodes of status epilepticus, and the development of neurocognitive impairment. Seizure freedom in this condition is rare and there is a higher rate of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) than other epilepsy syndromes. Stiripentol is a recently approved medication with an indication specifically for the treatment of seizures in children with Dravet syndrome.

Areas covered: Review of relevant literature including the current and emerging treatment of seizures in children with Dravet syndrome, with a focus on stiripentol. This includes a review of the literature regarding the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, and safety/tolerability of stiripentol.

Expert opinion: Stiripentol has been available through expanded access programs resulting in a reduction of seizures and episodes of status epilepticus. With the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval, this treatment option will be more readily available to the Dravet syndrome population in the United States. The approval comes at a time of other treatment options also receiving approval (cannabidiol) and several products in ongoing studies (fenfluramine, TAK-935) providing additional treatment options and hope on the horizon for those impacted by this severe epilepsy syndrome.     

The new antiepileptic drugs: pharmacological and clinical aspects

In recent years several new drugs (oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, zonisamide, tiagabine, fosphenytoin, vigabatrin and felbamate) have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against epilepsy. Some of these represent structural modifications of pre-existing compounds, others were developed with the specific objective of modifying neurotransmitter function, and many more were found to be clinically useful even though their mode of action is unclear or differs from that originally planned. The pharmacokinetics of these drugs differ widely from one agent to another. Some (gabapentin and vigabatrin) are eliminated unchanged in urine and have little or no interaction potential; others (tiagabine, lamotrigine, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, felbamate) are subject to induction of metabolism by concomitant anticonvulsants; lamotrigine is vulnerable to metabolic inhibition by valproate, and felbamate is a powerful enzyme inhibitor in addition to being an inducer of the metabolism of carbamazepine and steroid oral contraceptives. All new antiepileptic drugs have been found to be effective in improving seizure control in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures. However, lamotrigine, topiramate, zonisamide and felbamate appear to have broader efficacy against both partial and many generalized seizure types, while vigabatrin is also valuable in the management of infantile spasms. In monotherapy studies, new drugs have not been found to be more efficacious than older agents, but some may offer limited advantages in terms of improved tolerability. On the other hand, serious toxicity restricts considerably the use of vigabatrin and felbamate. Overall, new drugs represent valuable tools in the fight against epilepsy, but because of limited experience and cost considerations their first-line use cannot be recommended in most situations.     

The problem of osteoporosis in epileptic patients taking antiepileptic drugs

Introduction: Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder associated with recurrent seizures. Therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) helps achieve seizure remission in approximately 70% of epileptic patients. Treatment with AEDs is frequently lifelong and there are reports suggesting its negative influence on bone health. This is especially important in terms of general occurrence of osteoporosis, affecting over 50 million people worldwide.

Areas covered: This study refers to two main groups of AEDs: hepatic enzyme inducers (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone and topiramate) and non-inducers (clobazam, clonazepam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, tiagabine, valproate, vigabatrin and zonisamide). Some reports indicate that enzyme inducers may exert a more negative influence on bone mineral density (BMD) compared to non-inducers. Bone problems may appear in both sexes during AED therapy, although women are additionally burdened with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Supplementation of vitamin D and calcium in patients on AEDs is recommended.

Expert opinion: Apart from enzyme inducers, valproate (an even enzyme inhibitor) may also negatively affect BMD. However, the untoward effects of AEDs may depend upon their doses and duration of treatment. Although the problem of supplementation of vitamin D and calcium in epileptic patients on AEDs is controversial, there are recommendations to do so.     

Moving beyond sodium valproate: choosing the right anti-epileptic drug in children

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sodium valproate is a widely used anti-epileptic drug with a broad spectrum of activity and mechanism of action. It has consequently been the first-line drug for most seizure types in children for the past fifty years. A wide range of side effects come along with these exceptional properties, including teratogenicity and neuro-cognitive impairments in offspring. Therefore, epilepsy treatment in children and adolescents should be reassessed in light of newer antiepileptic drugs as well as a more targeted-approach with older drugs.

Areas covered: The authors review the main concerns of valproate use in terms of adverse effects on different systems and drug interactions. The current alternatives to valproate in absence, myoclonic, tonic-clonic and focal onset seizures in children/adolescents are also reviewed.

Expert opinion: There are several issues that research should address in antiepileptic therapy and in clinical studies with children, given the peculiarity of this population. Future perspectives in epilepsy therapy should now lead towards an individualized treatment.     

Stiripentol

Stiripentol (STP) is a new antiepileptic compound produced by Biocodex. It is not structurally related to any of the other currently marketed antiepileptic products as it belongs to the group of aromatic allylic alcohols. It has recently been proved to increase GABAergic transmission in experimental models. It has been studied and used in France and Canada for > 10 years, but its clinical development was delayed due to the inhibitory effect of STP on hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP). Clinical studies were based on the fact that STP also acts as an inhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 in vivo in epileptic patients. Although the studies in adult patients were disappointing, the trials conducted in paediatric populations demonstrated a specific efficacy of STP in a severe form of early childhood epilepsy, Dravet syndrome (severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy), when combined with valproate and clobazam. Based on these results, STP was granted orphan drug status in the European Union for the treatment of Dravet syndrome. The French experience in compassionate use suggests that STP might also be of benefit when combined with carbamazepine in paediatric patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy. Nevertheless, two controlled adjunctive-therapy trials were recently completed in paediatric populations with epilepsy. The interactions of STP with a large number of drugs need to be carefully taken into account by adjusting the doses of the combined antiepileptic drugs in order to improve the tolerability of the therapeutic association.     

Influence of agmatine on the protective action of numerous antiepileptic drugs against pentetrazole-induced seizures in miceA

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of agmatine (an endogenous neuromodulator/neurotransmitter in the brain) on the protective action of numerous classical and second-generation antiepileptic drugs (clonazepam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, phenobarbital, tiagabine, vigabatrin, and valproate) in the mouse pentetrazole-induced clonic seizure model.The results indicate that agmatine (up to 100 mg/kg, ip, 45 min before the test) did not alter the threshold for pentetrazole-induced clonic seizures in mice. However, agmatine (100 mg/kg, ip) significantly attenuated the anticonvulsant effects of vigabatrin against pentetrazole-induced clonic seizures by elevating the ED₅₀ value of vigabatrin from 517.5 to 790.3 mg/kg (p < 0.01). In contrast, agmatine at a dose of 50 mg/kg did not significantly affect the anticonvulsant action of vigabatrin, although a reduction in the ED₅₀ value of the antiepileptic drug from 517.5 to 629.1 mg/kg was documented. Moreover, agmatine at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg (ip) had no significant impact on the anticonvulsant action of clonazepam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, phenobarbital, tiagabine, or valproate in pentetrazole-induced seizures in mice.In conclusion, the combination of agmatine with vigabatrin seems to be unfavorable due to the reduction of the anticonvulsant effect of vigabatrin after concomitant administration of agmatine in the pentetrazole-induced seizure model. Therefore, the utmost caution is advised when combining agmatine with vigabatrin in further clinical settings.     

Stiripentol: new preparation. Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy: promising

(1) Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (Dravet's syndrome) is associated with multiple seizures and progressive onset of mental retardation. Available antiepileptics (valproic acid and clonazepam/clobazam) are only partially effective, even when used in combination. (2) Stiripentol is intended to be added to the valproate + clobazam combination when the latter is ineffective. (3) In a two-month double-blind trial, 9 of 21 infants remained seizure-free when stiripentol was added to the valproate-clobazam combination, whereas all 20 infants receiving a placebo instead of stiripentol continued to have seizures. (4) Two follow-up studies lasting two and three years and involving 37 and 46 children showed that about 20% of patients had a major benefit (fewer seizures) when stiripentol was added to inadequately effective valproate-clobazam combination therapy. The possible impact of stiripentol on psychomotor development is unknown. Stiripentol was only moderately effective in adolescents. (5) Stiripentol has common and sometimes serious adverse effects such as loss of appetite (with ensuing weight loss), drowsiness and insomnia. Stiripentol inhibits several cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, including CYP 3A4, creating a high risk of interactions, especially with co-administered antiepileptics. (6) The stiripentol dose strengths currently available in France are unsuitable for infants weighing less than 10 kg. (7) In practice, given the severity of this type of myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, the addition of stiripentol to ongoing but ineffective valproate-clobazam combination therapy is justified, even though the treatment is somewhat difficult to manage and has not yet been fully evaluated.     

Interactions between modulators of the GABA(A) receptor: Stiripentol and benzodiazepines

Many patients with refractory epilepsy are treated with polytherapy, and nearly 15% of epilepsy patients receive two or more anti-convulsant agents. The anti-convulsant stiripentol is used as an add-on treatment for the childhood epilepsy syndrome known as severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (Dravet syndrome). Stiripentol has multiple mechanisms of action, both enhancing GABA_A receptors and reducing activity of metabolic enzymes that break down other drugs. Stiripentol is typically co-administered with other anti-convulsants such as benzodiazepines which also act through GABA_A receptor modulation. Stiripentol slows the metabolism of some of these drugs through inhibition of a variety of cytochrome P450 enzymes, but could also influence their effects on GABAergic neurotransmission. Is it rational to co-administer drugs which can act through the same target? To examine the potential interaction between these modulators, we transiently transfected HEK-293T cells to produce α3β3γ2L or α3β3δ recombinant GABA_A receptors. Using whole-cell patch clamp recordings, we measured the response to each benzodiazepine alone and in combination with a maximally effective concentration of stiripentol. We compared the responses to four different benzodiazepines: diazepam, clonazepam, clobazam and norclobazam. In all cases we found that these modulators were equally effective in the presence and absence of stiripentol. The δ-containing receptors were insensitive to modulation by the benzodiazepines, which did not affect potentiation by stiripentol. These data suggest that stiripentol and the benzodiazepines act independently at GABA_A receptors and that polytherapy could be expected to increase the maximum effect beyond either drug alone, even without consideration of changes in metabolism.     

Vigabatrin: a comprehensive review of drug properties including clinical updates following recent FDA approval

Background: Vigabatrin (Sabril^®) was approved in the USA in mid-2009 for the adjunctive treatment of refractory complex partial seizures and as treatment of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin's more than 30-year history of research and development is condensed into a clinically relevant review pertaining to this 2009 approval. Methods/discussion: A review of the scientific literature was conducted with special focus given to the drug molecule, its mechanism of action, its effects on living systems (e.g., pharmacokinetic, pharmacologic and toxicologic), and its anticipated role among antiepileptic drugs in the USA. Conclusions: The recent approval of vigabatrin makes a significant addition to antiepileptic drug options. The FDA implemented a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to control for the possibility of severe adverse drug events.     

Emerging antiangiogenics for renal cancer

Introduction: Antiangiogenic therapy is considered to be the backbone of treatment strategy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). New, more focused, targeted drugs are emerging, while other targeted drugs oriented toward resistance or alternative mechanisms are under development.

Areas covered: Antiangiogenic agents include two types of agents: the monoclonal antibody, targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bevacizumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Data regarding efficacy and safety of these agents are reported. Differences between the first generation of TKIs, sunitinib, sorafenib, and the new generation, pazopanib, axitinib and tivozanib are also detailed. Most of these agents have been approved in the treatment of kidney cancer in specific settings of the disease.

Expert opinion: The class of antiangiogenic drugs for treatment of mRCC is already relatively full. After ‘me-too' drugs, more targeted drugs against VEGFR have been developed but have to demonstrate a benefit in first-line treatment. Another option for the development is to combine a known drug with an antiangiogenic inhibition profile and at least one additional target involved in resistance to an antiangiogenic or in an alternative pathway. The cost of approach with targeted drugs, including antiangiogenics, has led to a tremendous increase in the cost of care in mRCC.     

Evolution in the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer with ALK gene alterations: from the first- to third-generation of ALK inhibitors

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The medical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has radically changed over the last 10 years thanks to new molecular-targeted drugs able to act on biological mechanisms involved in tumor development. One such mechanism is the aberrant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) activation: patients with ALK-driven NSCLC benefit from treatments that selectively inhibit its pathogenetic mechanism.

Areas covered: The first-generation ALK inhibitor is crizotinib, initially used in Europe as second-line treatment for ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC patients, then approved as the standard first-line (already approved in the USA as front-line therapy). However, most patients eventually experience disease progression due to the emergence of secondary resistance, partly linked to ALK-dependent mechanisms, hence the development of second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors: ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib are approved for ALK-positive NSCLC, lorlatinib is currently being evaluated while others are under development.

Expert opinion: Despite the considerable responses to these new inhibitors, however, resistance mechanisms are described. Thus, while the therapeutic scenario of NSCLC has been soon revolutionized introducing next-generation ALK inhibitors in the first-line setting, future research should identify combined therapies or new generation drugs overcoming resistance in pretreated patients.     

Pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder

Introduction: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic, relapsing, debilitating disorder, associated with markedly impaired social and occupational functioning. Pharmacological treatment is considered standard care and several drug classes are now FDA approved for the treatment of GAD. While there are clear data for the efficacy of short-term acute treatment, long-term treatment and treatment-resistant GAD remain challenging.

Areas covered: This article describes current pharmacological treatment options for GAD, with focus on benzodiazepines, azapirones, antidepressants and anticonvulsant and antipsychotic drugs. Recent findings from placebo-controlled clinical trials are reviewed and evidence-based clinical implications are discussed. A PubMed search was completed using the terms: ‘generalized anxiety disorder AND treatment’ and ‘generalized anxiety disorder AND therapy’. Additional pivotal trials were included for a historical perspective (older landmark trials that established efficacy and safety for older drug classes in the treatment of GAD).

Expert opinion: Efficacy for treatment of GAD has been established for several different drug classes. At present, based on clear efficacy and good tolerability, first-line treatment with either a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) is indicated. If an initial, at least moderate, clinical response is achieved under antidepressant therapy, treatment should be at least continued for 12 months.     

Dacomitinib for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Different EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved for the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Dacomitinib is an orally administered, second-generation pan-HER inhibitor that has shown to improve PFS and OS compared to the first-generation TKI gefitinib and is the most recent inhibitor to be approved in this setting.

Areas covered: This article will review relevant literature regarding preclinical findings and clinical data from phase I-III trials of dacomitinib. We particularly discuss the mechanism of action of dacomitinib and its clinical efficacy and toxicity as a novel, first-line therapeutic option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Expert commentary: The therapeutic landscape for EGFR-mutated NSCLC has been greatly expanded. In the first-line setting, we have currently first-, second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs available and some combination strategies, including EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic drugs or chemotherapy, have also shown to be effective. However, more data are needed to define the optimal therapeutic sequencing of all these targeted agents and combinations. In this view, molecular profiling of tumor tissues and liquid biopsies may provide novel insights on mechanisms of resistance to different drugs and guide treatment decisions.     

Visual field constriction on vigabatrin

(1) Vigabatrin carries a high risk of concentric visual field constriction, sometimes associated with a drop in visual acuity. The changes in the visual field appear to be irreversible. (2) Consequently, vigabatrin can be considered only as a last resort for infantile spasms refractory to steroid therapy and for partial epilepsy refractory to other anticonvulsants. (3) Patients treated with vigabatrin must have their visual fields monitored regularly.     

Pharmacological considerations in the use of stiripentol for the treatment of epilepsy

Introduction: Despite the fact that more than 20 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are currently available, about one-third of patients still present drug resistance. Further efforts are required to develop novel and more efficacious therapeutic strategies, especially for refractory epileptic syndromes showing few and anecdotic therapeutic options.

Areas covered: Stiripentol (STP) is a second generation AED that shows GABAergic activity, with immature brain selectivity, and an indirect metabolic action on co-administered AEDs. Two pivotal studies demonstrated STP efficacy in patients with Dravet syndrome with refractory partial seizures, and marketing authorization in Europe, Canada and Japan was granted thereafter. Post-marketing surveys reported a good efficacy and tolerability profile. In addition, interesting data is currently emerging regarding off-label experimentation of STP in other forms of epilepsy.

Expert opinion: STP is an important addition to the limited treatment options available for patients resistant to common AEDs. The possibility to inhibit seizures through the metabolic pathway of lactate dehydrogenase and the inhibitory effects on the entry of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ are the most recent findings to emerge about STP and could be proof of its neuroprotective action. Moreover, its positive effects on cognitive function, its good safety and tolerability profile and the increasing data about STP efficacy on other refractory epileptic syndromes may prove to be fertile grounds for further investigation.     

托吡酯联合丙戊酸钠治疗婴儿痉挛的临床观察

目的 观察托毗酯联合丙戊酸钠治疗婴儿痉挛的临床疗效.方法 将40例婴儿痉挛患儿,随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组各20例.对照组采用常规丙戊酸钠口服的治疗方法;治疗组采用托吡酯联合丙戊酸钠治疗.连续治疗3个月后比较两组的临床疗效和脑电图改善情况.结果 治疗组总有效率(95.0%)、脑电图改善情况(90.0%)均优于对照组的(70.0%和60.0%)(x2=4.32,4.80,均P<0.05).结论 托吡酯添加治疗婴儿痉挛症不良反应较少,临床效果良好.