Class act: safety comparison of approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Introduction: The past decade has seen the development and widespread use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting a mutated EGFR (mEGFR) for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. We discuss the main properties of the TKIs currently recommended for the treatment of mEGFR NSCLC: gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib.

Areas covered: The mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of these drugs, with emphasis on the historical context of their preclinical and clinical development, will be covered, including potential resistance mechanisms to these first-generation TKIs that has driven the trial design for second and third generations of EGFR inhibitors. Six Phase III clinical trials comparing these three TKIs with cisplatin-based chemotherapy upfront for mEGFR NSCLC provide the basis for the comparative safety and toxicity analysis between these agents. Class-related toxicity of these EGFR inhibitors, including life-threatening effects, will be discussed.

Expert opinion: Toxicity and safety analysis from the Phase III trials of these agents in mEGFR populations suggests that afatinib has more frequent and severe side effects. Given that an efficacy advantage has not yet been demonstrated for afatinib over erlotinib and gefitinib, the consistent class toxicity profile of these agents means that gefitinib and erlotinib are a safer first-line treatment recommendation.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type EGFR

Introduction: While epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) – tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) lead to longer progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with conventional chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations, the role of EGFR-TKI remains unclear in EGFR-wild-type (WT) NSCLC.

Areas covered: This article reviews selected data from randomized trials regarding the use of TKIs in EGFR-WT NSCLC. Nine randomized phase III trials have compared EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients in a second or later line setting. Two of these trials, TAILOR and DELTA, which were designed to investigate treatment benefits according to EGFR genotype, demonstrated that docetaxel chemotherapy displayed significantly better in progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with the EGFR-TKI erlotinib. Biomarkers to predict clinical benefits of the drug against EGFR WT tumor, and the efficacy of combination regimens using erlotinib or single-use afatinib against tumors are also covered in this article.

Expert opinion: Considering the modest benefits of erlotinib for EGFR-WT tumors, future studies are warranted, including the exploration of useful biomarkers and new treatment strategies for EGFT-TKI use, as well as the development of more sensitive EGFR mutation tests.     

Reviewing the safety of erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer

Importance of the field: Erlotinib, a potent inhibitor of EGFR activity, is approved as a monotherapy for the treatment of advanced NSCLC and in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. The oral administration and manageable toxicity of erlotinib, along with its similar efficacy to chemotherapy, make it an important option as either maintenance therapy or in second-/third-line for patients with NSCLC who have previously received first-line chemotherapy. It is also an emerging option in other treatment settings in NSCLC.

Areas covered in this review: This review summarizes safety data from major clinical trials of erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC, as well as post-marketing data obtained in the 5 years since this drug was first approved.

What the reader will gain: An understanding of the common toxicities expected with erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Take home message: Erlotinib is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC. The main adverse events of rash and diarrhea are typically mild or moderate in severity, and rarely lead to treatment withdrawal. When necessary, rash and diarrhea can be easily managed prophylactically, by active intervention or through dose reduction.     

Protein kinase inhibitors to treat non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction: Activating mutations of the EGFR and rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) best illustrate the therapeutic relevance of molecular characterization in NSCLC patients.

Areas covered: For this review article, all published data on the most relevant Phase III trials with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of NSCLC were collected and analyzed.

Expert opinion: Eight Phase III trials clearly established EGFR TKIs as the best therapeutic option for front-line therapy in EGFR-mutated patients. In pretreated NSCLC, EGFR TKIs are considered more effective than standard monotherapy with cytotoxics in presence of classical EGFR mutations, whereas in the EGFR wild-type population, a similar efficacy to docetaxel or pemetrexed in term of survival has been demonstrated. In ALK-translocated NSCLC, a Phase III trial demonstrated the superiority of a multi-target TKI, including ALK, in terms of progression-free survival, response rate and toxicity profile when compared to standard second-line chemotherapy. New agents targeting EGFR or ALK are under evaluation particularly in individuals with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs or crizotinib.     

Pharmacotherapy targeting the EGFR oncogene in NSCLC

Introduction: The EGFR plays a central role in regulating cancer cell growth and survival, representing an attractive therapeutic target in NSCLC.

Areas covered: For the purpose of this review article, data from Phase II and III trials with anti-EGFR agents, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mAbs, were collected and analysed.

Expert opinion: Eight large Phase III trials demonstrated that EGFR-TKIs are the best option we can offer today as front-line therapy exclusively in EGFR mutant NSCLC. In patients with EGFR wild type or unknown lung cancer, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care, with no consistent benefit produced by the addition of an anti-EGFR treatment. In pretreated NSCLC, EGFR-TKIs are considered more effective than standard monotherapy with cytotoxics in presence of classical EGFR mutations, whereas in the EGFR wild-type population, a similar efficacy with docetaxel or pemetrexed in terms of survival has been demonstrated. New agents targeting EGFR are under investigation, particularly in individuals with squamous cell histology and those with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs.     

Personalized treatment of EGFR mutant and ALK-positive patients in NSCLC

Introduction: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is mutated in 15% of adenocarcinomas of the lung. In addition, the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is altered in 8% of adenocarcinomas of the lung. Treatment of EGFR mutant and ALK translocation-positive tumors in NSCLC with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) results in a dramatic therapeutic response and has revolutionized therapy. Unfortunately, resistance to TKIs invariably develops. Many promising new therapies are under investigation to overcome the resistance.

Areas covered: We analyzed the current primary literature and recent national meetings to evaluate the clinical characteristics and therapeutic implications of relevant treatments for EGFR mutant and ALK-positive NSCLC in the first-line, acquired resistance, and adjuvant settings.

Expert opinion: Treatment with EGFR TKIs in the first-line setting of EGFR mutant NSCLC results in a significant clinical benefit. Several promising third generation EGFR TKIs are being evaluated in Phase II and III trials in the acquired resistance setting. Crizotinib is superior to chemotherapy in the first-line setting for ALK-positive NSCLC. Ceritinib is effective and approved for ALK-positive NSCLC in the acquired resistance setting. Continued investigation is needed to develop novel therapies to overcome acquired resistance to TKIs.     

Safety of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer treatment

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The development of EGFR TKI and the subsequent identification of activating EGFR mutations have dramatically changed how NSCLC is treated. With its recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, gefitinib adds to the list of recommended first-line treatments for lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations, which hitherto includes erlotinib and afatinib.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the pharmacological property, clinical efficacy, and safety of gefitinib in major clinical trials and post-marketing studies.

Expert opinion: Gefitinib is a well-tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC. The most common adverse events are skin reaction and diarrhea, both of which are generally mild, noncumulative, and manageable. Other side effects such as interstitial lung disease and liver toxicity are less common but can be serious. Which EGFR TKI is the preferred first-line treatment is a matter of debate. Gefitinib and erlotinib have comparable efficacy, whereas afatinib may exert superior clinical activity over gefitinib. In terms of the most common toxicities of skin reaction and diarrhea, gefitinib may be the most tolerable of the three. Hence, despite being the earliest EGFR TKI developed, gefitinib continues to be one of the first-line treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, especially when skin and gastrointestinal toxicity is a concern.     

Erlotinib: a new therapeutic approach for non-small cell lung cancer

Although treatment with cytotoxic agents has produced modest survival improvement in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it appears that a plateau has been reached with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens. Increasing knowledge regarding the properties of malignant neoplasms has identified a number of potential therapeutic targets. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of these targets. Preclinical models have revealed that tumour growth can be inhibited by monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR and EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Erlotinib (Tarceva trade mark; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Roche), a quinazoline derivative with good oral absorption, is one of several EGFR tyrosine kinases that has been studied in clinical trials. In a Phase I study, mild diarrhoea and mild rash were the most common toxicities. At a dose of 200 mg/day, diarrhoea was the dose-limiting toxicity. The observation that EGFR overexpression is relatively common in NSCLC led to a Phase II trial of erlotinib at the maximum-tolerated dose (150 mg/day) in previously treated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib produced a 12% response rate and there was no apparent relationship between response and tumour EGFR levels. More recent reports suggest that patients who develop a rash have higher responses. Based on its single agent activity, erlotinib has been evaluated in two Phase III trials which compared erlotinib plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in previously untreated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib has also been compared to placebo in a Phase III trial which was limited to advanced stage NSCLC patients whose disease had progressed after two previous chemotherapy regimens. The optimum use of erlotinib in NSCLC will be determined by the results of the completed and future Phase III trials.     

Afatinib for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR-positive NSCLC: a look at the data

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are detected in about 10–15% of Caucasian and 30–40% of Asian patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients harbouring EGFR mutations, the treatment with different available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed to be more effective and safe than platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.

Areas covered: The current evidences about the role of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC are reviewed and discussed. We report a review based on a MEDLINE/PubMed, searched for randomized phase II or III trials evaluating afatinib in EGFR-positive NSCLC.

Expert commentary: Afatinib is the third EGFR TKI approved for the treatment of NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations, showing high efficacy in this setting of patients.     

Erlotinib: a new therapeutic approach for non-small cell lung cancer

Although treatment with cytotoxic agents has produced modest survival improvement in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it appears that a plateau has been reached with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens. Increasing knowledge regarding the properties of malignant neoplasms has identified a number of potential therapeutic targets. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of these targets. Preclinical models have revealed that tumour growth can be inhibited by monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR and EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Erlotinib (Tarceva?; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Roche), a quinazoline derivative with good oral absorption, is one of several EGFR tyrosine kinases that has been studied in clinical trials. In a Phase I study, mild diarrhoea and mild rash were the most common toxicities. At a dose of 200 mg/day, diarrhoea was the dose-limiting toxicity. The observation that EGFR overexpression is relatively common in NSCLC led to a Phase II trial of erlotinib at the maximum-tolerated dose (150 mg/day) in previously treated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib produced a 12% response rate and there was no apparent relationship between response and tumour EGFR levels. More recent reports suggest that patients who develop a rash have higher responses. Based on its single agent activity, erlotinib has been evaluated in two Phase III trials which compared erlotinib plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in previously untreated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib has also been compared to placebo in a Phase III trial which was limited to advanced stage NSCLC patients whose disease had progressed after two previous chemotherapy regimens. The optimum use of erlotinib in NSCLC will be determined by the results of the completed and future Phase III trials.     

Gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Introduction: Gefitinib is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across therapy lines. In the first-line setting, recent randomized Phase III trials comparing EGFR-TKIs versus platinum-based doublets demonstrated that in patients harboring an activating EGFR mutation, gefitinib is superior to chemotherapy in terms of response rate, progression-free survival, toxicity profile and quality of life, with a marginal positive effect on survival. In order to choose the best treatment, a molecular characterization is now mandatory, as part of baseline diagnostic procedures.

Areas covered: All published data on gefitinib in lung cancer were analyzed using PubMed. The aim of this review is to summarize activity and safety data from major clinical trials of gefitinib in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Expert opinion: EGFR-TKIs including gefitinib are the best option we can offer today in patients with EGFR mutation, regardless of treatment line. Administration of gefitinib to patients with advanced NSCLC is usually well-tolerated and it also appears to be feasible in special populations characterized by a significantly poorer risk:benefit ratio with standard chemotherapy, like elderly patients and patients with poor performance status.     

EGFR TKI combination with immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitizing EGFR gene mutation.

Areas covered: Almost all patients treated with EGFR TKIs eventually develop acquired resistance. It has been reported that activation of the oncogenic EGFR pathway enhances susceptibility of the lung tumors to PD-1 blockade in mouse model, suggesting combination of PD1 blockade with EGFR TKIs may be a promising therapeutic strategy. Nivolumab combined with erlotinib was associated with 19% of grade 3 toxicities. The combination of osimertinib plus durvalumab in pretreated or chemo naïve NSCLC patients showed encouraging clinical activity, however, this combination was associated with high incidence of interstitial lung disease (38%), leading to termination of further enrollment. The combination of gefitinib plus durvalumab demonstrated encouraging activity but higher incidence of grade 3/4 liver enzyme elevation (40–70%). The treatment related Grade 3–4 adverse events were observed in 39% of patients when treated with atezolizumab plus erlotinib.

Expert opinion: Given the relatively high incidence of treatment-related toxicities associated with combination of EGFR TKI and immunotherapy, further development of this approach remains controversial. Until now, the combination of EGFR TKI and immunotherapy should be investigational.     

Optimization of genetics to create therapies for metastatic (stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer

Importance of the field: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a disseminated disease in 50% of cases, with a gloomy prognosis and median survivals of < 1 year.

Areas covered in this review: Based on substantial advances, cancer biology insights and novel biotechnology tools, customized treatment provides hints that cisplatin-based treatment can be optimized in favorable subgroups of patients according to gene expression DNA repair profiles. In 2004, it was discovered that 10 – 15% of NSCLC can harbor a new class of EGFR mutation conferring specific sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

What the reader will gain: The homologous recombination pathway provides information for customizing cisplatin-based chemotherapy. BRCA1 plays a central role in this pathway that can be used in tailoring chemotherapy. Patient subgroups can obtain significant increases in progression-free survival. For EGFR lung-addicted cancers, treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors like erlotinib provide impressive improvement in progression-free survival – up to 14 months with significant enhanced survival.

Take home message: Customized chemotherapy based on BRCA1 models can contribute to demonstrating this approach's clinical relevance, and the implementation of EGFR mutation assessment is warranted to identify EGFR-addicted lung cancers with a different prognosis that could benefit from a specifically targeted therapy approach.     

Vandetanib for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction: The use of targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing, especially as conventional chemotherapy affords relatively small benefits at a cost of increased toxicity. Two of the more established therapeutic targets in NSCLC are the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Vandetanib is an orally available inhibitor of VEGFR and EGFR signalling and is an attractive therapeutic agent owing to the simultaneous inhibition of both pathways.

Areas covered: This review encompasses the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of vandetanib in advanced NSCLC. Of particular interest are the randomized Phase III clinical trials, which did not show clinically significant overall survival benefit for vandetanib monotherapy or in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens.

Expert opinion: Vandetanib has anti-tumour activity in NSCLC, with improved objective responses and disease control. However, significant survival benefits were not demonstrated in Phase III clinical trials and at present vandetanib is not in further development for use in NSCLC.     

The combination of antitumor drugs,exemestane and erlotinib,induced resistance mechanism in H358 and A549 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines

Context: Estrogens in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are important, and their interaction with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) might be crucial.

Objective: This study investigates the effect of exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor, and erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor, on human NSCLC cell lines; H23, H358 and A549.

Materials and methods: A cell proliferation assay was used for measuring cell number, apoptosis assay for detecting apoptosis and necrosis and immunoblotting for beclin-1 and Bcl-2 proteins detection. An immunofluorescence assay was used for EGFR localization. A migration assay and zymography were used for cell motility and metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression, respectively.

Results: Exemestane, erlotinib or their combination decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. Exemestane’s half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) was 50?μM for H23 and H358 cells and 20?μM for A549. The IC₅₀ of erlotinib was 25?μM for all cell lines. Apoptosis increase induced by exemestane was 58.0 (H23), 186.3 (H358) and 34.7% (A549) and by erlotinib was 16.7 (H23), 65.3 (H358) and 66.3% (A549). A synergy effect was observed only in H23 cells. Noteworthy, the combination of exemestane and erlotinib decreased beclin-1 protein levels (32.3?±?19.2%), an indicator of autophagy, in H23 cells. The combination of exemestane and erlotinib partially reversed the EGFR translocation to mitochondria and decreased MMP levels and migration.

Discussion and conclusions: The benefit from a dual targeting of aromatase and EGFR seems to be regulated by NSCLC cell content. The diverse responses of cells to agents might be influenced by the dominance of certain molecular pathways.     

Pemetrexed in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Importance of the field: Current therapeutic options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) yield relatively modest improvements in survival leading to an ongoing search for new active treatment agents. In the past decade, pemetrexed has had an increasingly established role in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in both first- and second-line settings.

Areas covered in this review: Currently available published data on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced NSCLC are described. Peer-reviewed publications on the development of pemetrexed and its clinical use in NSCLC were reviewed (1995 – 2009).

What the reader will gain: Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate cytotoxic agent. Key Phase II and Phase III trials are described that have shown pemetrexed's efficacy in both the first- and second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The efficacy of pemetrexed seems to vary between squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Possible reasons for this are explored. Additionally, the potential role of pemetrexed in maintenance therapy is discussed.

Take home message: Pemetrexed is an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC, with an overall favorable toxicity profile. There is growing evidence that, in patients treated with pemetrexed, nonsquamous tumors have improved outcomes compared to squamous cell tumors. Pemetrexed may also have a role in maintenance therapy for NSCLC.     

Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: In EGFR mutated advanced NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are new valid options as first-line treatment. Gefitinib appears a valid alternative to chemotherapy as first-line therapy, in EGFR mutated elderly or unfit patients too, while erlotinib remains an option for subsequent lines of treatment. AREAS COVERED: Areas covered in this review include two international trials, which evaluated erlotinib in chemo-naive EGFR mutated patients both in an Asian and caucasian population, showing a dramatic advantage in terms of progression-free survival and overall response rate as well as gefitinib. Results showed a good safety profile, with side effects of mild to moderate intensity, usually manageable with temporary interruption of treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Investigating EGFR mutations is critical in order to obtain sufficient data. It has now become mandatory for molecular characterization, as part of baseline diagnostic procedures. This approach is also becoming increasingly important during progression of the disease as a sort of 'molecular follow up'. It plays a central role in the right choice of treatment, in an aim to give the best drug to the right patients, overcoming other well known prognostic factors.     

Dacomitinib for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Different EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved for the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Dacomitinib is an orally administered, second-generation pan-HER inhibitor that has shown to improve PFS and OS compared to the first-generation TKI gefitinib and is the most recent inhibitor to be approved in this setting.

Areas covered: This article will review relevant literature regarding preclinical findings and clinical data from phase I-III trials of dacomitinib. We particularly discuss the mechanism of action of dacomitinib and its clinical efficacy and toxicity as a novel, first-line therapeutic option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Expert commentary: The therapeutic landscape for EGFR-mutated NSCLC has been greatly expanded. In the first-line setting, we have currently first-, second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs available and some combination strategies, including EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic drugs or chemotherapy, have also shown to be effective. However, more data are needed to define the optimal therapeutic sequencing of all these targeted agents and combinations. In this view, molecular profiling of tumor tissues and liquid biopsies may provide novel insights on mechanisms of resistance to different drugs and guide treatment decisions.     

Optimal management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

In recent years, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), gefitinib and erlotinib, which have promising activity and a favourable toxicity profile, have been used in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The knowledge that EGFR-activating mutations confer sensitivity to EGFR TKIs has led to the design and analysis of phase II and III studies of gefitinib or erlotinib treatment in various clinical scenarios. We review the important NSCLC clinical trials of the efficacy of EGFR TKIs in the context of EGFR-activating mutations. In all phase II single-arm studies or phase III randomized comparative studies, EGFR TKIs as monotherapy were superior to combination chemotherapy in terms of response rate and progression-free survival in patients with activating EGFR mutations. EGFR TKIs have contributed to the superior overall survival time in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations compared with those patients without EGFR mutations. The results of these studies have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. NSCLC with EGFR mutations constitutes a new entity requiring different personalized treatment strategies.     

Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Importance of the field: The management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift in the last decade, with the survival advantage demonstrated by the incorporation of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents to the standard treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC.

Areas covered in this review: We review the existing data regarding the distinct anti-EGFR agents in the NSCLC treatment and the potential role of the investigated biomarkers in the clinical outcome.

What the reader will gain: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used in first-line, second-line and more settings with extremely good results in a subgroup of patients. Cetuximab remains the only anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody to show survival benefit when combined with a cytotoxic agent in the front-line setting. Anti-EGFR treatment is associated with a dramatic clinical benefit in a subgroup of patients, emphasizing the importance of customizing treatment. Several biomarkers have been investigated for their predictive or prognostic value. Validation of identification of biomarkers remains a focus of intense research that may ultimately guide therapeutic decision making, as none of these is considered ideal to discriminate responding from non-responding patients. However, the current evidence of the EGFR mutation analysis from a recent randomised trial suggests that EGFR mutation analysis is quite a good predictive marker for responsiveness to anti-EGFR TKIs. Moreover, the identification of surrogate markers to indicate optimal activity of the anti-EGFR agent is also needed. This review article provides data from large clinical trials using anti-EGFR agents and correlates these results with the tested biomarkers.

Take home message: EGFR inhibition has shown very encouraging results and has improved the outcome of the NSCLC treatment. However, a plateau of significant clinical benefit seems to have been reached and we believe that the time to move away from the traditional treatment approach to more individualizing therapies has come.