Frequency of asthma education in primary care in the years 2007–2010

Objective: Recent research suggests that health disparities persist among asthmatic patients and receipt of asthma education, though recent guidelines have highlighted the importance of receiving asthma education. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in the receipt of asthma education as well as to identify disparities in asthma education using the most recently available data in National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2007–2010. Methods: Weighted chi-square tests were conducted to identify associations between asthma education and variables of interest. A weighted multivariate logistic regression model was subsequently constructed to jointly assess the association of factors of interest on receipt of asthma education. Submission to the Campbell University Institutional Review Board resulted in expedited approval. Results: The percentage of patients who receive asthma education remains quite low. After adjusting for all variables of interest: no statistically significant difference in receipt of asthma education between year groups (2007–2008, 2009–2010) was found (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–1.34); patients seen by pediatricians (vs. internal medicine physicians) and Hispanic or Latino patients (vs. non-Hispanic or Latino patients) were more likely to receive asthma education (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.11–6.66 and OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.18–4.60, respectively); and patients not prescribed a controller medication were less likely to receive asthma education than those who were (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.82). Conclusions: Combined with previously published results, it appears the provision of asthma education continues to be low, despite proven benefits. Additionally, some patient and physician characteristics may be associated with the delivery of asthma education.     

Chronic illness management: what is the role of primary care?

An estimated 99 million Americans live with a chronic illness. Meeting the needs of this population is one of the major challenges facing the U.S. health care system today and in the future. Dozens of studies, surveys, and audits have revealed that sizable proportions of chronically ill patients have not received effective therapy and do not have optimal disease control. The consistent findings of generally substandard care for many chronic conditions have spurred proposals that care be shifted to specialists or disease management programs. Published evidence to date does not indicate any clear superiority of these alternatives to primary care. The defining features of primary care (that is, continuity, coordination, and comprehensiveness) are well suited to care of chronic illness. A rapidly growing body of health services research points to the design of the care system, not the specialty of the physician, as the primary determinant of chronic care quality. The future of primary care in the United States may depend on its ability to successfully redesign care systems that can meet the needs of a growing population of chronically ill patients.     

Complementary and alternative medicine use in asthma: Who is using what?

Consumer interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown dramatically in Western countries in the past decade. However, very few patients volunteer information about CAM use unless directly questioned by their health-care practitioner. Therefore, by being informed about the prevalence and modality of CAM use for asthma, as well as characteristics of users, health-care practitioners may be better able to identify patients who use CAM. In turn, this may facilitate proactive discussion and optimization of the patient's overall asthma management. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about use of CAM by people with asthma, and to assess the applicability of the available studies to the broader asthmatic population. Computerized literature searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED) databases from their inception to 13 April 2005. Search terms included: complementary medicine/therapies, alternative medicine/therapies and asthma. The bibliographies of accessible articles were searched for further papers. Seventeen studies have examined the use of CAM by people with asthma. The reported level of use for adults ranged from 4% to 79%, and for children from 33% to 89%. Among the most commonly used CAMs were: breathing techniques, herbal products, homeopathy and acupuncture. There is no strong evidence for effectiveness for any of these modalities. There is little consistency among available prevalence studies making conclusions difficult. Nevertheless, the high rates of CAM use reported in some studies indicate that CAM use should be taken into account when managing patients with asthma.     

Control of asthma under specialist care: is it achieved?

BACKGROUND: The goal of asthma treatment is control of asthma and good quality of life for asthmatic patients; however, many asthmatic patients experience symptoms and limitations. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine treatment outcome in asthmatic patients under specialist care. DESIGN: Multicenter, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Four large outpatient asthma clinics in teaching hospitals in three Greek cities. PATIENTS: Three hundred seventy-eight randomly selected patients with mild or moderate asthma (265 female patients; mean age, 42.3 years). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients completed a questionnaire structured with eight domains covering patient characteristics, drug use at baseline and during exacerbations, regular follow-up, emergency visits, asthma control, symptoms, and limitations. Results show that the majority of patients have symptoms and limitations in their physical and social activities and have frequent exacerbations, while > 40% of patients think that their asthma is not well controlled. Most of our patients receive preventive medication (primarily inhaled corticosteroids, but less so long-acting beta2-agonists [LABAs] and leukotriene antagonists), increase their use of medication in case of exacerbations and have regular follow-up. However, the report shows that 48% of patients tried to reduce their medication dose, a fact implying that compliance is not always good. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the goals of asthma treatment are not achieved, even under specialist care. Perhaps more effort should be invested in patient education while an increase in the use of LABAs and leukotriene antagonists, medications that have been shown to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and improve quality of life, may help better asthma outcomes.     

The integrated care of asthma in Switzerland (INCAS)–study: Patients' perspective of received asthma care and their interest in asthma education

Objective: For successful long-term asthma care, self-management education is a cornerstone. Little is known about associations between patients' interest in education, asthma control and care delivery. We compared patients' characteristics, asthma control and patients' perspective about asthma care in subjects with and without interest in asthma education. Moreover, we assessed reasons, why patients denied participating in asthma education. Methods: Baseline data of 223 patients with asthma (age 43 ± 12 years, 38% male, 58% non-smokers, 13% current smokers), who participated in a multicentre longitudinal controlled study, are reported. At baseline, patients completed the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care questionnaire (PACIC 5A) and stated their interest in an asthma education programme. Results: Overall, 34% of all participants showed uncontrolled asthma. One hundred and twenty-five (56%) patients were interested in education. Compared to patients without interest, they were characterised by male gender (p = 0.013), worse asthma control (p < 0.001), and perception of lower quality of chronic asthma care delivery, in particular lower self-management support (p < 0.001). Main reasons for rejecting asthma education were having sufficient asthma knowledge, having only mild asthma, receiving adequate medical support and lack of time. Conclusions: More than half of the patients were interested in asthma education. Interest was associated with worse asthma control and lower receipt of care according to the Chronic Care Model. Considering these aspects, this approach may help to improve care quality and allow targeting interventions to those patients who are interested in becoming active participants in their care and who might benefit most.     

Measuring asthma quality in primary care: Can we develop better measures?

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is common and commonly under-treated. Currently quality indicators often do not provide specific directions for areas of improvement. This work lays the foundation for a quality improvement initiative that provides practice-specific feedback related directly to clinical activities completed for individual patients with asthma. METHODS: Medical record review using a group of quality assessment elements developed from previous medical record review studies of asthma care and the NAEPP asthma care guidelines. RESULTS: For 500 school children ages 5-18 yr who made one or more asthma visits in the year of interest, the frequency of daytime asthma symptoms were recorded in 54% of patients' medical records at any time during a one-year period, while nighttime symptom frequency was recorded in 33%. Only 12% of medical records recorded any information on missed work, school or activity days. Nine percent recorded information or acknowledged any asthma "triggers". Asthma severity level was documented in only an additional 4% of the children's records. Most medical records documented prescribed asthma medications and dosages (85%) but few recorded the medications or dosages the patients were actually taking. CONCLUSIONS: Many medical records do not include the basic clinical information required to assess asthma severity, adherence to asthma therapy or the response to therapy. This lack of information makes implementation of asthma care guidelines impossible. Therefore, these measures may be useful baseline quality indicators to begin the process of improving asthma care.     

The use of large databases to study pneumonia: what is their value?

A large pneumonia database can be defined as one containing more than 1000 patients. Important strengths of large databases include the ability to evaluate infrequent predictor or outcome variables, and increased generalizability. Beyond analysis of the database core study, large databases facilitate secondary analysis, expansion with ancillary studies, and concurrent analysis with other databases. Computer technology is now available that is able to merge sizable databases with the objective to generate a very large database. Construction of a global, very large pneumonia database is an achievable goal that can move clinical research in pneumonia to a higher level.     

Can access to spirometry in asthma education centres influence the referral rate by primary physicians for education?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

Asthma remains uncontrolled in a large number of asthmatic patients. Recent surveys have shown that a minority of asthmatic patients are referred to asthma educators. The objective of the present study was to assess the influence of increased access to spirometry in asthma education centres (AECs) on the rate of patient referrals to these centres by general practitioners.

METHODS:

A one-year, prospective, randomized, multicentric, parallel group study was conducted over two consecutive periods of six months each, with added spirometry being offered in the second six-month period to the experimental group. Ten AECs were enrolled in the project. An advertisement describing the AECs’ services was sent by mail to a total of 303 general practitioners at the start of each period, inviting them to refer their patients. Measures of the frequency of medical referrals to the AECs were assessed for each period.

RESULTS:

The group of AECs randomly selected for spirometry in the second six-month period received 48 medical referrals during the first period and 32 during the second one, following proposed spirometry. AECs that had not offered spirometry received five referrals during the first period and seven during the second period. One AEC withdrew a few weeks after the study began and others encountered administrative problems, reducing their ability to provide interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Referral to AECs is not yet integrated into the primary care of asthma and offering more rapid access to spirometry in the AECs does not seem to be a significant incentive for such referrals.     

Alcohol use disorders in primary care: do gender-specific differences exist?

OBJECTIVE: To describe how alcohol use disorders (AUDs) affect women, focusing on gender-specific implications for primary care physicians (PCPs). DESIGN: An overview of literature from 1966 to 2000 identified by a MEDLINE, PsychINFO and HealthSTAR/Ovid Healthstar database search using key words “women,” “alcohol” and “alcoholism.” MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Although the prevalence of AUDs is greater in men than in women, women with AUDs are more likely to seek help, but less likely to be identified by their physicians. Psychiatric comorbidities (especially depression and eating disorders) are more common in women with AUDs than in men with AUDs. A past history of sexual and/or physical abuse places a woman at increased risk for AUDs. Women have a greater sensitivity to alcohol, have an accelerated progression from alcohol toxicity, and have increased mortality at lower levels of consumption compared to men. Women and men who are light-to-moderate drinkers have lower coronary artery disease mortality than do abstainers or heavy drinkers. Risk of breast cancer is increased in women who drink ≥1 drinks daily. Common barriers to treatment include: fear of abandonment by partner; fear of loss of children; and financial dependency. Brief interventions have been shown to be effective in reduction of alcohol consumption in women with at-risk drinking. It is unclear if women-only treatment programs improve outcomes. CONCLUSION: PCPs should be alert to gender-specific differences for women with AUDs.     

A care pathway for chlamydia, what's happening in primary care 12 months on?

Primary care is seen as central to the future provision of sexual health services, including chlamydia screening. The aim of this study was to establish levels of awareness and application of a chlamydia care pathway among practice nurses in primary care 12 months after its launch and present knowledge and practice of testing. Questionnaires were sent to 46 practice nurses at 22 general practitioner practices within the care pathway pilot site. Response rate was 33/46 (72%), with 30 (94%) practice nurses aware of the care pathway and 19 (62%) routinely using it. Endocervical swabbing was performed by 29 (90%) respondents, no endourethral swabs were taken from men and 85% nurses did not perceive partner notification as being part of their role. Practice nurses identified the need for training in using the care pathway and in identification of infection to optimize the provision of effective sexual health care in primary care.     

Electrocardiography in primary care; is it useful?

Little is known about the value of electrocardiography in primary care. AIMS: To assess whether electrocardiography (ECG) is a useful instrument, in addition to history taking and physical examination, in that it changes the general practitioner's management of patients with suspected cardiovascular symptoms or disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective study in a group practice of eight general practitioners in The Netherlands. During 2 years all ECGs that were recorded in these practices were studied. Two questionnaires were filled out by the general practitioners, one before and one after the ECG recording, to determine indication for electrocardiography, the general practitioner's anticipated management before and after ECG results, and the subjective usefulness according to the applying doctor. All ECGs were reviewed by an experienced general practitioner working in the group practice and later on by a cardiologist. In addition, all clinical information, including the 6 months follow-up period, was scrutinised by both the cardiologist and general practitioner to establish the patients' prognosis. A total of 301 ECGs was included in the analysis. Main indications for electrocardiography were chest pain (57%), and collapse or palpitation (30%). In 92 (30.6%; 95% CI 25.4-35.8) patients a change in management by the general practitioner occurred following the ECG results. Most prevalent changes were non-referral to a cardiologist, while referral was anticipated before the ECG results (34%), referral while the patient would not have been referred without ECG results (20%), and change in cardiovascular therapy (40%). In one of these cases only, this change could be considered unfavourable, since a subendocardial infarction, not detectable on the ECG, was missed. In patients with chest pain, a normal ECG (likelihood ratio (LR) 0.06) and an abnormal ECG (LR 13.3) were very useful to distinguish between patients likely or unlikely to experience cardiac events in the near future. The mean subjective usefulness, on a scale of 0-100, of the ECG evaluation according to the applying general practitioner was 77. 5 (S.D. 14.4). There was good agreement in ECG interpretation between the experienced general practitioner, the cardiologist and a second general practitioner. CONCLUSION: Electrocardiography in addition to history taking and physical examination, may be an important tool in primary care. It can reduce considerably the number of unnecessary referrals.