Effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin and vildagliptin add-on to metformin in real-world settings in Egypt – results from the GUARD study

Objective: The GUARD study evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of vildagliptin treatment with or without metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in real-life settings. Here we present the results of the GUARD study for the patient subset from Egypt.

Research design and methods: This was a 24?±?6 weeks, prospective, non-interventional study that enrolled adult patients with T2DM receiving vildagliptin or vildagliptin?+?metformin combination therapy as per local prescribing information.

Main outcome measures: The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 24?±?6 endpoint. Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Results: Of 2786 patients enrolled from Egypt, 655 received vildagliptin and 2131 received vildagliptin?+?metformin. Overall, at baseline, mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 49.5?±?9.49 years, BMI was 31.5?±?4.85?kg/m², HbA1c was 8.4?±?0.86%, and duration of T2DM was 2.3?±?3.78 years. At week 24, significant reductions in mean (±SD) HbA1c were observed in the vildagliptin (?1.47?±?0.79%) and vildagliptin?+?metformin (?1.62?±?0.82%) groups (both p?Conclusion: In a real-world setting, vildagliptin, with or without metformin, resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c and was well tolerated in patients with T2DM from Egypt. Limitations of the study include non-randomization and the open-label, observational nature of the study.     

Initial combination therapy with vildagliptin plus metformin in drug-naïve patients with T2DM: a 24-week real-life study from Asia

Aims: To assess the effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin/metformin initial combination therapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: INITIAL was a 24-week prospective, observational study in T2DM patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)?≥?7.5%, and prescribed vildagliptin/metformin as initial combination therapy. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints were HbA1c change from baseline to week 12, proportion of patients achieving HbA1c ≤7.0%, change in body weight at 12 and 24 weeks, change in HbA1c by sub-groups (baseline HbA1c, age, body mass index [BMI], dosage strength, co-morbidities) from baseline to week 24, and safety.

Results: A total of 532 patients were enrolled. The mean age, HbA1c, and BMI were 49.6?±?11.27 years, 9.3?±?1.57%, and 26.7?±?4.50?kg/m², respectively. Cardiovascular risk factors present at baseline were dyslipidemia (30.1%), hypertension (29.7%), and obesity (20.9%). The mean reductions in HbA1c from baseline to week 12 (?1.6?±?1.59%) and 24 (?1.9?±?1.70%) were statistically significant (p?Conclusions: Overall, in a relatively young drug-naïve T2DM Asian study population with high baseline HbA1c and often associated with cardiovascular risk factors, vildagliptin/metformin combination therapy was associated with significant and clinically relevant HbA1c reduction from baseline. This effect was seen at week 12, was maintained over 24 weeks, and was accompanied by good tolerability.     

Comparison of a twice daily injection of insulin aspart 50 with insulin aspart 30 in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a twice daily injection of insulin aspart (BIAsp) 30 and BIAsp50 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poorly controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs).

Methods: In this 12 week prospective, randomized, parallel trial, a total of 80 T2DM patients, 59?±?10?years old with a disease duration of 9.3?±?6.6?years and HbA1c >7% despite large doses of metformin and sulfonylurea administration, were randomized to receive BIAsp30 (n?=?40) or BIAsp50 (n?=?40). The primary endpoint was a change in HbA1c at week 12.

Results: The changes in HbA1c from baseline were ?2.5%?±?1.0% in the BIAsp50 group and ?2.5%?±?1.2% in the BIAsp30 group (p?=?.897). No difference was observed in the rate of HbA1c target achievement (<7.0%) between BIAsp50 (42.5%) and BIAsp30 (32.5%) (p?=?.495). The change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the BIAsp50 group was lower than that in the BIAsp30 group (p?<?.001), while the change in two-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPBG) was higher and blood glucose excursion was lower in the BIAsp50 group than that in the BIAsp30 group (p?<?.001, p?<?.001). A significant improvement in HbA1c was observed with BIAsp50 in subgroups with baseline blood glucose excursion >7.8?mmol/L or 2hPBG >17.6?mmol/L compared with BIAsp30. There were no differences in hypoglycemia or body weight between groups.

Conclusions: Compared with BIAsp30, BIAsp50 showed greater efficacy in patients with baseline BG excursion >7.8?mmol/L or 2hPBG >17.6?mmol/L as well as good safety for hypoglycemia.

Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR-IIR-16008958.     

A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor omarigliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of the once-weekly (q.w.) dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, omarigliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind trial, patients with T2DM on a stable dose of metformin monotherapy (≥1500?mg/day) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0–10.5% were randomized to omarigliptin 25?mg q.w. or matching placebo (n?=?201 in both) for 24 weeks (primary timepoint) followed by an additional 80-week treatment period.

Results: At week 24, from a mean baseline HbA1c of 8.0–8.1%, the least squares (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline in HbA1c (primary end-point) was –0.54% (–0.69%, –0.40%) in the omarigliptin group and 0.00% (–0.14%, 0.15%) in the placebo group, for a between-group difference of –0.55% (–0.75%, –0.34%); p?p?=?.011) and –0.5 mmol/L (–0.9, –0.1) (p?=?.010), respectively. At week 24, the incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and subjects with one or more adverse event (AE), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to an AE were similar in the omarigliptin and placebo groups. Over 104 weeks, omarigliptin treatment provided a clinically meaningful reduction in HbA1c.

Conclusions: In patients with T2DM, adding omarigliptin 25?mg q.w. to metformin monotherapy improved glycemic control over 104 weeks and was generally welltolerated with a low risk of hypoglycemia.     

Effects of calcitriol on bone mineral density in patients treated with esomeprazole

Context: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) increases the risk of decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). However, whether calcitrol improves this situation is unknown.

Objective: The current study investigates the effects of calcitriol on BMD in patients with esomeprazole therapy.

Materials and methods: Three hundred and eighty-six participants with gastrointestinal ulcerations were enrolled and randomly assigned into controlled and supplemented groups. Participants in the controlled group were prescribed esomeprazole (20?mg/qd), while the supplemented group was prescribed esomeprazole (20?mg/qd) and calcitriol (2.5?μg/qd). BMD, serum levels of calcium, carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX), and alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) were assessed.

Results: (1) No significant between-group difference of age, gender, smoking, previous glucocorticoid use and hemoglobin level was found; (2) after 10.6?±?0.8?d of PPI therapy, BMD T score in the controlled group was slightly increased compared with initial (?1.25?±?0.08 versus ?1.28?±?0.06, p?=?0.084), while there was no change in the supplemented group (?1.25?±?0.05 versus ?1.26?±?0.03, p?=?0.308); (3) during study termination, calcium level in the supplemented group was slightly higher than the controlled group (2.05?±?0.03?mmol/L versus 2.01?±?0.05?mmol/L, p?=?0.073), while no significant differences of CTX (366.57?±?43.71?pg/mL versus 373.15?±?50.23?pg/mL, p?=?0.036) and ALP were found among these two groups (50.47?±?9.32?U/L versus 52.23?±?10.45?U/L, p?=?0.075).

Conclusion: Patients with gastrointestinal ulcerations with esomeprazole therapy, calcitriol supplement showed no efficacy on BMD changes.     

The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective: To compare the effects of either vildagliptin or glimepiride on glycemic variability, oxidative stress, and endothelial parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin alone.

Methods: In this randomized, open-label, parallel study, 34 patients with T2DM being treated with metformin having an HbA1c of 7.0–10.0% were allocated into either the vildagliptin or glimepiride group. A mixed-meal tolerance test and 72-hour continuous glucose monitoring were conducted, and urinary 8-iso-prostaglandinF_2α (PGF_2α) and endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) were evaluated at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.

Results: Similar significant improvements in HbA1c level were shown in both vildagliptin (?0.8%) and glimepiride (?0.9%) groups after treatment (Ps<0.001). The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) and the mean of daily differences (MODD) were significantly decreased by vildagliptin (P = 0.044 and P = 0.031, respectively) but not by glimepiride. Glimepiride was significantly associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycemia than vildagliptin (P = 0.005). There were no significant differences in urinary 8-iso-PGF_2α or FMD between the two groups.

Conclusions: Vildagliptin effectively improved glucose level with a significantly greater reduction in glycemic variability and hypoglycemia than glimepiride in patients with T2DM ongoing metformin therapy. The two drugs showed no significant differences in urinary 8-iso-PGF_2α and FMD.

Trial registration: NCT01404676     

Exenatide effects on diabetes,obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes treated for at least 3 years

ABSTRACT

Background: Exenatide, an incretin mimetic for adjunctive treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), reduced hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) and weight in clinical trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of?≥?3 years exenatide therapy on glycemic control, body weight, cardiometabolic markers, and safety.

Methods: Patients from three placebo-controlled trials and their open-label extensions were enrolled into one open-ended, open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomized to twice daily (BID) placebo, 5?µg exenatide, or 10?µg exenatide for 30 weeks, followed by 5?µg exenatide BID for 4 weeks, then 10?µg exenatide BID for ≥3 years of exenatide exposure. Patients continued metformin and/or sulfonylureas.

Results: 217 patients (64% male, age 58?±?10 years, weight 99?±?18?kg, BMI 34?±?5?kg/m², A1C 8.2?±?1.0% [mean?±?SD]) completed 3 years of exenatide exposure. Reductions in A1C from baseline to week 12 (?1.1?±?0.1% [mean?±?SEM]) were sustained to 3 years (?1.0?±?0.1%; p?<?0.0001), with 46% achieving A1C?≤?7%. Exenatide progressively reduced body weight from baseline (?5.3?±?0.4?kg at 3 years; p?<?0.0001). Patients with elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at baseline (n?=?116) had reduced ALT (?10.4?±?1.5?IU/L; p?<?0.0001) and 41% achieved normal ALT. Patients with elevated ALT at baseline tended to lose more weight than patients with normal ALT at baseline (?6.1?±?0.6?kg vs. ?4.4?±?0.5?kg; p?=?0.03), however weight change was minimally correlated with baseline ALT (r?=??0.01) or ALT change (r?=?0.31). Homeostasis Model Assessment B (HOMA-B), blood pressure, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) all improved. A subset achieved 3.5 years of exenatide exposure and had serum lipids available for analysis (n?=?151). Triglycerides decreased 12% (p?=?0.0003), total cholesterol decreased 5% (p?=?0.0007), LDL-C decreased 6% (p?<?0.0001), and HDL-C increased 24% (p <?0.0001). Exenatide was generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was mild-to-moderate nausea. The main limitation of this study is the open-label, uncontrolled nature of the study design which does not provide a placebo group for comparison.

Conclusion: Adjunctive exenatide treatment for ≥3 years in T2DM patients resulted in sustained improvements in glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and hepatic biomarkers, coupled with progressive weight reduction.     

The effect of vildagliptin relative to sulfonylurea as dual therapy with metformin (or as monotherapy) in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan in the Middle East: the VIRTUE study

Objective: To assess the effect of vildagliptin relative to sulfonylurea (SU) on hypoglycemic events, in Muslim patients from the Middle East with type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramadan. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least one hypoglycemic event (HE) during the fasting period. Secondary endpoints included change in weight, HbA1c levels, treatment adherence and overall safety.

Design and methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study enrolled Muslim adult T2DM patients from Middle Eastern countries who received treatment with vildagliptin or SU as add on to metformin or monotherapy. During a ～16 week observation period, data was collected up to 6 weeks before and 6 weeks after Ramadan fasting.

Results: A total of 584 patients from the Middle East enrolled in the study; 308 patients received vildagliptin and 265 received SU. Significantly fewer vildagliptin patients reported at least one HE (3.7% vildagliptin vs. 25.5% SU; p?p?=?.128). Mean change in HbA1c at the end of study showed ?0.18% between treatment difference in favor of vildagliptin, p?=?.001. Mean body weight change at the end of study showed ?0.68?kg between treatment difference in favor of vildagliptin, p?Limitations: Being observational and not mandating HE confirmation with blood glucose measurement (though it was done in a large number of patients) were key limitations.

Conclusion: Anti-hyperglycemic treatment with vildagliptin led to significantly fewer hypoglycemia events compared to sulfonylurea treatment among Muslim diabetic patients who fast during Ramadan. Good glycemic control, weight control and safety results supported this outcome.     

Once-daily insulin detemir in a cohort of insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis from the PREDICTIVE study

ABSTRACT

Objective: PREDICTIVE^* is a large, observational study of the empirical use of insulin detemir in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1DM/T2DM). This post hoc analysis evaluates insulin-naïve patients with T2DM uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) who were initiated and remained on once-daily insulin detemir for 12 weeks.

Research design and methods: This observational, multinational, multi-center, open-label prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir in 1653 insulin-naïve patients with T2DM (mean age 60.8?±?10.9 years, BMI 29.8?±?4.8?kg/m², and HbA_1C 8.82?±?1.50%). Statistical comparisons were made between baseline and 12-week follow up data. Our study was subject to the usual limitations of observational studies.

Main outcome measures: Endpoints were: incidence of serious adverse drug reactions, including number of hypoglycemic events (total, major, and nocturnal), glycemic parameters, and weight change.

Results: Following insulin initiation, no significant change occurred in the number of nocturnal hypoglycemic events or total hypoglycemic events (p?=?0.4513), and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed during the 12 weeks of treatment. HbA_1C decreased by a mean 1.25% (SD?±?1.25%; p?<?0.0001), with 30% of patients (n?=?383) achieving HbA_1C <7% at 12 weeks. Mean changes in fasting blood glucose and fasting blood glucose variability were –3.62?mmol/L (SD?±?2.93; p?<?0.0001) and ?0.48?mmol/L (SD?±?1.03; p?<?0.0001), respectively. Body weight decreased by a mean 0.5?kg (SD?±?3.3; p?<?0.0001), with weight loss or no weight change occurring in a substantial percentage of patients in each BMI category (<25, 25–30, 30–35, and >35?kg/m²). Patients with higher baseline BMI lost the most weight, with the greatest weight loss (–1.20?kg) reported in those with BMI >35?kg/m².

Conclusions: Empirical use of insulin detemir as an insulin initiation strategy can improve glycemic control with good tolerability, including a low risk of hypoglycemia and a weight benefit, in a majority of insulin-naïve patients uncontrolled on OADs.     

Safety and efficacy of metformin up-titration in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with vildagliptin and low-dose metformin

Background: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of metformin up-titration in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with vildagliptin (100 mg/day) and low-dose metformin (500 or 750 mg/day).

Research design and methods: Fifty patients were randomly allocated to the control group (maintaining the initial low-dose of metformin) and the dose increase group (up-titrating of metformin to 1,500–2,250 mg/day) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks.

Results: Among the 25 patients allocated to the dose increase group, four patients were not able to complete the study protocol because of gastrointestinal symptoms. HbA1c in the dose increase group was significantly but modestly lower than in the control group (change in HbA1c: 0.22 ± 0.57 vs. ?0.15 ± 0.58%, group comparison, P < 0.05). The dose increase group did not gain weight during the study period, and no hypoglycemic events were reported in both groups. The rate of gastrointestinal symptoms in the dose increase group was profoundly higher than in the control group (32 vs. 0%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with vildagliptin and low-dose metformin, metformin up-titration significantly but modestly improved glycemic control without hypoglycemia and weight gain.     

Efficacy and tolerability of initial combination therapy with nateglinide and metformin in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

SUMMARY

Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of nateglinide (120?mg, ac) and metformin (500?mg, tid) as initial treatment in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Research design and methods: This study reports data from the treatment-naïve (TN) subgroup of patients in a previously published, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial that compared nateglinide, metformin, and the combination therapy (CT) in 701 patients with T2DM with baseline HbA_1c between 6.8% and 11.0%. Of the 401 TN patients, 104, 104, 89, and 104 patients received nateglinide (120?mg, ac), metformin (500?mg, tid), CT, and placebo, respectively. The baseline characteristics of each group were similar, with mean age, BMI, duration of diabetes, HbA_1c, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of approximately 58 years, 30?kg/m², 4 years, 8.2%, and 10.2?mmol/L, respectively.

Results: In patients receiving initial CT, HbA_1c decreased substantially (? = –1.6 ± 0.1%, p < 0.0001 vs. baseline or placebo) from a mean baseline of 8.2 ± 0.1%, an effect significantly greater than the 0.8% reduction observed with both monotherapies (?p < 0.001); whereas, in placebo-treated patients, HbA_1c increased modestly (? = +0.3 ± 0.1%, p < 0.05) from an identical baseline value. Seventy percent of CT-treated patients achieved a target HbA_1c of < 7.0%. Both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and the 2-hour postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) after a liquid meal challenge decreased by 2.3?mmol/L in patients receiving CT, while the changes from baseline values in FPG and PPGE were +0.2 ± 0.3?mmol/L and –0.5 ± 0.2?mmol/L, respectively, in placebo-treated patients. The incremental 30-minute post-load insulin levels increased by 88 ± 32?pmol/L (?p = 0.006) in patients receiving CT and did not change significantly in placebo-treated patients. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 27% of patients receiving CT (vs. 27.9% in the metformin monotherapy, and 14.4% in the placebo groups). Confirmed hypoglycemia (glucose ≤ 2.8?mmol/L) occurred in 3.4% of patients receiving CT.

Conclusions: Initial CT with the rapid-acting insulinotropic agent, nateglinide, and metformin, an agent with insulin-sensitizing effects in the liver and periphery, is a safe and effective means of achieving glycemic targets in TN patients with T2DM.     

Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological effects after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy

SUMMARY

Objective: To compare the efficacy of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological recovery following an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with high-dose chemotherapy.

Methods: A retrospective case-controlled study.

Results: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery above 0.5?×?10⁹?l^?1 and white blood cell (WBC) recovery above 4?×?10⁹?l^?1 for 3 consecutive days was achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim ((13.2?±?8.0 vs 19.0?±?10.0 days, p?=?0.004), (16.9?±?9.7 vs 29.9?±?16.6 days, p?=?0.001), respectively). The platelet recovery above 20 x 10⁹/l was also achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim (19.5?±?11.6 vs

27.2?±?13.8 days, p?=?0.006). Furthermore, filgrastim-treated patients received fewer days of granulocyte colony simulating factor (G-CSF) administration (12.5?±?7.0 vs 18.6?±?8.5 days, p?=?0.001) and spent less time in hospital (23.7?±?10.9 vs 32.0?±?17.6 days, p?=?0.009). Duration of antibiotic administration was also significantly shorter in the filgrastim group (13.6?±?7.6 vs 29.1?±?19.8 days, p?=?0.001). Conclusion: In patients undergoing PBSCT following high-dose chemotherapy, filgrastim significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and days of G-CSF administration, and led to earlier hospital discharge compared with lenograstim.     

Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycemic control.

Research design and methods: This study included a main treatment cohort (MTC) with 401 patients (HbA_1c?≥?7% and ≤10%) randomized and treated with oral saxagliptin 2.5, 5, or 10?mg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks and a separate open-label cohort (OLC) with 66 patients (HbA_1c?>?10% and ≤12%) who received saxagliptin 10?mg once daily for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was HbA_1c change from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 24?in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), proportion of patients achieving HbA_1c?<?7%, and changes in postprandial glucose area-under-the-curve (PPG-AUC). Efficacy analyses for continuous variables were performed using an ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward methodology.

Results: In the MTC, saxagliptin demonstrated statistically significant decreases in adjusted mean HbA_1c changes from baseline (mean, 7.9%) to week 24 (?0.43%, ?0.46%, ?0.54%) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10?mg, respectively, vs. +0.19% for placebo (all p?<?0.0001). Adjusted mean FPG was significantly reduced from baseline (?15, ?9, ?17?mg/dL) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10?mg, respectively, vs. +6?mg/dL for placebo (p?=?0.0002, p?=?0.0074, p?<?0.0001, respectively). More saxagliptin-treated patients achieved HbA_1c?<?7% at week 24 (35% [p?=?NS], 38% [p?=?0.0443], 41% [p?=?0.0133]) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10?mg, respectively, than placebo (24%). PPG-AUC was reduced for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10?mg (?6868, ?6896, ?8084?mg·min/dL, respectively) vs. placebo (?647?mg·min/dL) with statistical significance demonstrated for saxagliptin 5?mg (p?=?0.0002) and 10?mg (p?<?0.0001). HbA_1c, FPG, and PPG-AUC reductions were also observed in the OLC at 24 weeks. In the MTC, adverse event frequency was similar across all study arms. No cases of confirmed hypoglycemia (symptoms, with fingerstick glucose ≤50?mg/dL) were observed in either cohort. Saxagliptin was not associated with weight gain. Study limitations included the lack of a control group for the OLC and the use of prespecified rescue criteria, which limited the exposure time during which patients could remain on their originally randomized medication without the introduction of additional antihyperglycemic rescue treatment.

Conclusions: Once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in key parameters of glycemic control vs. placebo.

Trial Registration: Clinical Trials NCT00121641     

Real-world evaluation of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

Objective To evaluate glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with canagliflozin (CANA) vs. dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.

Methods Using integrated claims and lab data from a US health plan of commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees, this matched-control cohort study assessed adult T2DM patients receiving treatment with CANA or DPP-4 inhibitors (1 April 2013–31 December 2013). Cohorts were chosen hierarchically; the first pharmacy claim for CANA was identified as the index date; then the first pharmacy claim for a DPP-4 inhibitor was identified and index date set. Eligible patients had 6 months of continuous health plan enrollment before the index date (baseline) and 9 months after (follow-up) and no evidence of index drug in baseline. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and percentages of patients with HbA1c <8% and <7% during the follow-up were evaluated.

Results The matched CANA and DPP-4 inhibitor cohorts (53.2% treated with sitagliptin) included 2766 patients each (mean age: 55.7 years). Among patients with baseline and follow-up HbA1c results, mean baseline HbA1c values were similar, 8.62% and 8.57% (p?=?0.615) for the CANA (n?=?729) and DPP-4 inhibitor (n?=?710) cohorts, respectively. Change in HbA1c was greater among patients in the CANA cohort than for those in the DPP-4 inhibitor cohort (?0.92% vs. ?0.63%, p?<?0.001), and also among the subset of patients with baseline HbA1c ≥7% (-1.07% [n?=?624] vs. ?0.79% [n?=?603], p?=?0.004). During follow-up, greater percentages of the CANA cohort relative to the DPP-4 inhibitor cohort achieved HbA1c of <8% (66.0% vs. 58.6%, p?=?0.004) and <7% (35.4% vs. 29.9%, p?=?0.022).

Limitations This study was observational and residual confounding remains a possibility.

Conclusions In this real-world study of patients with T2DM, CANA use was associated with greater HbA1c reduction and higher percentages of patients attaining HbA1c goals than those treated with DPP-4 inhibitors.     

Efficacy and safety of coenzyme A versus fenofibrate in patients with hyperlipidemia: a multicenter,double-blind,double-mimic,randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Background: We investigated the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of coenzyme A (CoA) versus fenofibrate in Chinese patients with moderate dyslipidemia.

Methods: A total of 417 subjects (aged 18–75?years) diagnosed with moderate dyslipidemia (triglyceride 2.3–6.5?mmol/L) from 13 large cardiovascular centers in China were recruited and randomly divided into a fenofibrate group (n?=?207), which received 200?mg of fenofibrate orally once daily, and a CoA group (n?=?210), which received 400?mg of CoA orally once a day. Blood lipoproteins, liver and renal function, creatine kinase, and blood glucose were measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8?weeks of treatment.

Results: The baseline triglyceride (TG) level in the fenofibrate group and the CoA group was 3.39?±?0.99?mmol/L and 3.60?±?1.11?mmol/L, respectively. After treatment for 4 and 8?weeks with fenofibrate, TG was reduced by 31.62% and 33.13%. In the CoA group, TG was reduced by 17.29% and 23.80%. Compared with baseline, total cholesterol (TC) was significantly decreased in both groups after either 4 or 8?weeks of treatment (p?<?.05). CoA increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) after 4?weeks of treatment, whereas it had no significant effect on HDL-C after 8?weeks of treatment. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was not modified in either group. The incidence of side effects was significantly lower in the CoA group compared with the fenofibrate group (p?<?.05).

Conclusions: Compared with fenofibrate, CoA has less effect on reducing plasma TG levels in subjects with moderate dyslipidemia. However, it has fewer adverse effects.     

Momordica charantia extracts ameliorate insulin resistance by regulating the expression of SOCS-3 and JNK in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats

Context: Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) has long been widely used as a traditional remedy for diabetes mellitus in some countries. However, detailed antidiabetic mechanisms are largely unknown.

Objectives: This study clarified the ameliorating effects of M. charantia ethanol extracts (MCE) on the insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rats.

Materials and methods: T2DM rat model was established by high-fat diet and streptozotocin (STZ) injection. Diabetic rats were randomized into five groups: the model control group (n?=?8) (common diet), the high-fat diet metformin (50?mg/kg/d), and the three-dose MCE (100, 200, and 400?mg/kg/d) groups (n?=?8 each). After 8 weeks, the fasting serum glucose, insulin, TNF-α, and IL-6 were measured, and the relevant factors of glucose and insulin were monitored by glycogen dyeing, RT-PCR, and western blot, respectively.

Results: The 8-week treatment of 400?mg/kg MCE significantly lowered body weight (330.1 versus 365.9?g), serum glucose (7.41 versus 16.63?mmol/L), insulin (12.06 versus 15.89 mIU/L), TNF-α (52.72 versus 81.83?ng/L), and IL-6 (104.81 versus 135.74?ng/L) in comparison with those of the diabetic control group (p?p?Conclusions: MCE can ameliorate insulin resistance in T2DM rats. This effect may be related to the regulation of mRNA and protein levels of SOCS-3 and JNK.     

Effects of garlic polysaccharide on alcoholic liver fibrosis and intestinal microflora in mice

Context: Alcoholic liver fibrosis (ALF) is treatable and reversible consequence of liver disease. Intestinal microflora plays an important role in the progression of liver disease. Garlic (Allium sativum L. [Amaryllidaceae]) has been consumed as a traditional medicine to treat liver injury.

Objective: To investigate the effects of garlic polysaccharide (GP) on ALF and intestinal microflora in mice.

Materials and methods: KM mice were orally administered with alcohol (56%, 6?mL/kg) for 30?d to establish ALF model, and divided into four groups together with control group (water only). Hugan tablet (60?mg/kg) or GP (250 and 150?mg/kg) were given 5?h after each dose of alcohol. Biochemical markers in serum and liver homogenate were determined with kits. Alteration of intestinal microflora, and protein expressions of TGF-β1, TNF-α and decorin were detected.

Results: In GP-H group, ALT and AST decreased to 18.85?±?4.71?U/L and 40.84?±?7.89?U/L. MDA, TC, TG and LDL-C decreased to 2.32?±?0.86?mmol/mg, 0.21?±?0.12?mmol/L, 0.96?±?0.31?mmol/L and 0.084?±?0.027?mmol/L. SOD, GSH-Px and GSH increased to 118.32?±?16.32?U/mg, 523.72?±?64.20?U/mg and 0.56?±?0.05?mg/g. Ratios of TGF-β1 and TNF-α decreased to 0.608?±?0.170 and 1.057?±?0.058, decorin increased to 2.182?±?0.129. Lachnospiraceae and Lactobacillus increased, Facklamia and Firmicutes decreased with GP pretreatment.

Discussion and conclusions: Intestinal microflora provides novel insight into the mechanisms of GP that may be used to treat ALF and intestinal microflora dysbiosis.     

The role of microalbuminuria and insulin resistance as significant risk factors for white matter lesions in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients

ABSTRACT

Objective: The presence of white matter lesions (WML) is an important prognostic factor for the development of stroke. Microalbuminuria, which is associated with diabetes, has been flagged as a novel predictor for cerebrovascular events. This preliminary study was therefore designed to test the hypothesis that the presence of WML correlates with microalbuminuria and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus (DM) not receiving insulin treatment.

Patients and methods: Based on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, 90 type 2 diabetic patients were divided into two groups: a WML-positive group (57?±?8 years, mean?±?SD, n?=?34) and a WML-negative group (57?±?6 years, n?=?56). The level of blood glucose was assessed by fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting immunoreactive insulin (F-IRI), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, and hemoglobin A _1c (HbA1c).

Results: The body mass index was higher in the WML-positive group than in the WML-negative group (p?<?0.01). Plasma levels of triglycerides were higher while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was lower in the WML-positive group than in the WML-negative group (p?<?0.05 and p?<?0.0001, respectively). Fasting plasma glucose (p?<?0.005), insulin concentrations (p?<?0.0001), HOMA index (p?<?0.0001), and urinary albumin excretion (p?<?0.0001) levels were higher in the WML-positive group than in the WML-negative group. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that WML was independently predicted by the microalbuminuria and insulin resistance (p?<?0.005, p?<?0.0005, respectively).

Conclusion: The results of this preliminary study indicate that the presence of WML was associated with the microalbuminuria and insulin resistance in these Japanese patients with type 2 DM; larger cohort studies are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Recombinant bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor protects the liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced chronic injury in rats

Abstract

Context: Bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) has been reported to relieve liver ischemia-reperfusion-induced injury in rats.

Objective: This study was designed to determine whether the recombinant BPTI (rBPTI) can prevent the chronic liver injury induced by CCl₄ in rats.

Materials and methods: Fifty male Wistar rats were divided into five groups. Rats were treated with 40% CCl₄ at a dose of 2?ml/kg body weight twice a week subcutaneously for 12 weeks. In the 8th week, they were administered intraperitoneally with rBPTI (80 MU/kg), BPTI (80 MU/kg) or hepatocyte growth-promoting factor (pHGF; 100?mg/kg) daily for the next 4 weeks.

Results: rBPTI significantly prevented the disruption of liver function of alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 172.7?±?18.16 versus 141.2?±?15.28, p?=?0.003), aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 225.10?±?36.54 versus 170.06?±?27.14, p?=?0.007) and hydroxyproline (Hyp; 1.14?±?0.27 versus 0.62?±?0.17, p?=?0.001). rBPTI significantly decreased the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS; 1.15?±?0.16 versus 0.87?±?0.15, p?=?0.003) and increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD; 6.07?±?0.95 versus 7.75?±?1.12, p?=?0.007). rBPTI reduced the production of cytokines of IL-1β and TGF-β. The hepatocyte necrosis, fibrosis, fatty degeneration and inflammatory cell infiltration were ameliorated by rBPTI administration.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that rBPTI exerted a hepatoprotective effect on chronic liver fibrosis induced by CCl₄, which suggests that rBPTI may have the potential application for chronic liver injury induced by drugs metabolism and toxic substances.     

The efficacy of pregabalin for treating pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pregabalin for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) in subjects with type 1 (T1DM) or 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Pooled data from 10 randomized clinical trials (pregabalin-treated T1DM and T2DM subjects with pDPN) were analyzed for change from baseline (CFB) scores (pain and sleep disturbance) using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) through Week 12 and last observation carried forward (LOCF). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results: Pregabalin-treated (T1DM 156 [8.7%]; T2DM 1632 [91.3%]) and placebo subjects (T1DM 92 [9.6%]; T2DM 868 [90.4%]) had comparable baseline demographic characteristics between treatment groups within the same diabetes type. T2DM (vs. T1DM) subjects were ～10 years older. With pregabalin and placebo, respectively, mean?±?SD baseline pain (T1DM: 6.2?±?1.4 and 6.5?±?1.6; T2DM: 6.5?±?1.5 and 6.4?±?1.5) and sleep scores (T1DM: 5.2?±?2.4 and 5.2?±?2.7; T2DM: 5.3?±?2.5 and 5.1?±?2.5) were comparable. Using MMRM, mean CFB treatment differences (pregabalin minus placebo) were significantly different for pain and sleep with either diabetes types (all weeks p?<?.05). With LOCF, pregabalin’s odds ratios (ORs) of achieving 30% pain reduction were similar with T2DM (OR, 1.91, 95% CI [1.61, 2.27]) and T1DM (2.01 [1.18, 3.44]) (both p ≤ .01). Pregabalin’s ORs of 30% improvement in sleep quality were 1.81 (95% CI, 1.06, 3.09) with T1DM and 2.01 (1.69, 2.39) with T2DM (both p?<?.05). AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of pregabalin.

Conclusions: Pregabalin significantly improved pain and sleep quality, without a clinically meaningful difference between diabetes types.

ClinicalTrial.gov registration: NCT00156078, NCT00159679, NCT00143156, NCT00553475.