Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring profiles in a cross-sectional analysis of a large database of normotensive and true or suspected hypertensive patients

Objective

To assess ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) circadian patterns and their determinants in a large sample of normotensive and hypertensive patients.

Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

Detection of masked hypertension by home blood pressure measurement: is the number of measurements an important issue?

BACKGROUND: Office blood pressure (OBP) and home blood pressure (HBP) enable the identification of patients with masked hypertension. Masked hypertension is defined by normal OBP and high HBP and is known as a pejorative cardiovascular risk factor. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate in the SHEAF study the influence of the number of office or home blood pressure measurements on the classification of patients as masked hypertensives. METHODS: Patients with OBP <140/90 mmHg (mean of six values: three measurements at two separate visits, V1 and V2) and HBP >135/85 mmHg (mean of all valid measurements performed over a 4-day period) were the masked hypertensive reference group. The consistency of the classification was evaluated by using five definitions of HBP values (mean of the 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 first measurements) and two definitions of OBP values (mean of three measurements at V1 and mean of three measurements at V2). RESULTS: Among the 4939 treated hypertensives included in the SHEAF study, 463 (9.4%) were classified as masked hypertensives (reference group). By decreasing the number of office or home measurements, the prevalence of masked hypertension ranged from 8.9-12.1%. The sensitivity of the classification ranged from 94-69% therefore 6-31% of the masked hypertensives were not detected. The specificity ranged from 98-94% therefore 1-6% of patients were wrongly classified as masked hypertensives. CONCLUSION: A limited number of home and office BP measurements allowed the detection of masked hypertension with a high specificity and a low sensitivity. A sufficient number of measurements (three measurements at two visits for OBP and three measurements in the morning and in the evening over 2 days for HBP) are required to diagnose masked hypertension.     

Assessment of self-monitoring of blood pressure in the diagnosis of isolated clinic hypertension

BACKGROUND: There are no studies assessing cardiovascular morbidity, morality in patients with isolated clinical hypertension (ICH) with self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM). OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of SBPM in the diagnosis of ICH. METHODS: Cohort study. New hypertensive and normotensive patients 15-75 years, without cardiovascular events history. VARIABLES: Oriented anamnesis hypertension; blood pressure measurements (BP): clinical BP, SBPM and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM); evaluation of target organ damage (TOD); electrocardiogram; retinography and microalbuminuria (MA). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients, 95 hypertensive (62.1% males; mean age 59.08+/-16.8 years), 40 normotensive (37.5% males; mean are 56.32+/-10.22 years). BP measurements (mmHG) in normotensives vs hypertensives: clinical BP, 125.36/76.74 vs 149.81/87.86 mmHg (p<0.0001) and SPPM, 114.90/69.96 vs 142.06/86.31 (p<0.0001). Twenty-four-hour ABPM: 135.41/81/81.74. Prevalence of TOD in hypertensive: 23.10% left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), sustained hypertension (SH): clinic BP, 149.88/86.34 vs 152.51/89.55 (p>0.10); SBPM: 147.895/88.95 vs 128.17/79 (p<0.0001) and ABPM, 141.72/88.22 vs 131.66/80 (p=0.053 for systolic). TOD in SH vs ICH: LVH, 24.6% vs 19.2% (p=0.814); exudates or haemorrhages, 7.7% vs 9.8% (p=0.580). The risk of an occurrence of any TOD in ICH patients is lower for 125/80 (OR=2.5). CONCLUSIONS: VAMPAHICA will provide information about value SBPM in the diagnosis of ICH. Advanced retinopathy is relative frequent in ICH patients. If TOD is accepted as a surrogate endpoint, the diagnostic values of ICH will be probably decreased.     

Clinical predictors and impact of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric hypertension referrals

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is rising in children. Significant proportions of children have reactive hypertension or masked hypertension, making ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) a valuable tool, although with potential economic implications. In youth referred for elevated BP, we sought clinic BP combinations that obviated the need for ABPM and to specify the economic role of ABPM. In a retrospective pediatric referral cohort (N = 170), we examine clinic systolic BP (SBP) predictors of components of ABPM hypertension and their combination. In economic analyses, we compared effectiveness and charges of three diagnostic pathways: (1) clinic BP alone; (2) abnormal clinic BP prompting ABPM; or (3) universal ABPM. ABPM hypertension occurred in 55 (32.4%) and reactive hypertension in 37 (21.8%), average automated (β = 0.208; 95% confidence interval, 0.027, 0.389; P = .03) and maximum auscultatory clinic SBP (β = 0.160; 95% confidence interval 0.022, 0.299; P = .02) were associated with ABPM SBP mean, but none predicted SBP load. No clinic SBP combination was associated with ABPM hypertension. Universal ABPM accrued the lowest average charge per hypertensive youth identified ($10,948). We did not identify a clinic SBP combination that predicted ABPM hypertension in youth referred for elevated BP. Universal ABPM, in this context, may be the most economically and clinically efficient diagnostic strategy.     

Left ventricular changes in isolated office hypertension: a blood pressure-matched comparison with normotension and sustained hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Isolated office (IO) hypertension is a benign condition according to some researchers, whereas others believe it is associated with cardiovascular abnormalities and increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to compare morphofunctional characteristics of the left ventricle (LV) in IO hypertensive subjects, normotensive subjects (hereafter, hypertensives and normotensives), and never-treated sustained hypertensives. The 3 groups were matched not only by age, sex, and body mass index but also by clinic blood pressure (BP) (IO hypertensives and sustained hypertensives) and daytime BP (IO hypertensives and normotensives). METHODS: We enrolled 42 IO hypertensives (clinic BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP < or = 130/80 mm Hg), 42 sustained hypertensives (clinic BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP > or = 140 and/or 90 mm Hg) and 42 normotensives (clinic BP < 135 and/or 85 mm Hg and daytime BP < or = 130/80 mm Hg). Left ventricular morphologic features and function were assessed using digitized M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Compared with normotensives, IO hypertensives had significantly thicker LV walls, increased LV mass, reduced diastolic function, increased prevalence of LV hypertrophy, and preclinical diastolic dysfunction. Sustained hypertensives, compared with IO hypertensives, had significantly thicker LV wall, higher LV mass, and lower diastolic function, whereas the prevalence of LV hypertrophy and preclinical diastolic dysfunction was greater than in IO hypertensives, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing matched BP groups, IO hypertensives have LV morphofunctional characteristics considerably different from normotensives and qualitatively similar to sustained hypertensives. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that IO hypertension should not be considered as simply a benign condition.     

Isolated ambulatory hypertension is common in outpatients referred to a hypertension centre

The present investigation was aimed at determining the prevalence and the blood pressure (BP) profile of isolated ambulatory hypertension, defined as an elevated ambulatory BP with normal office blood pressure, in a series of 1488 consecutive outpatients referred for routine clinical evaluation of suspected or established arterial hypertension. All patients underwent both office BP (OBP) measurement by a physician and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Using OBP values (cutoff for diagnosis of hypertension >/=140/90 mmHg) and daytime ABPM (cutoff for diagnosis of hypertension >/=135/85 mmHg), patients were classified into eight subgroups. In the whole series we found that, independent of treatment status, the prevalence of isolated ambulatory hypertension exceeded 10%. More importantly, 45.3% of individuals who presented with normal OBP values, showed elevated BP at ABPM. Night-time BP, 24-h pulse pressure, and BP variability were significantly higher in isolated ambulatory hypertensives than in normotensive or in white-coat hypertensive individuals. Therefore, isolated ambulatory hypertension is characterized by a blood pressure profile that is similar to that observed in sustained hypertension. These findings suggest that isolated ambulatory hypertension is very common and probably the indications for ABPM should be more extensive in outpatients referred to hypertensive centre.     

Automated office blood pressure measurements in primary care are misleading in more than one third of treated hypertensives: The VALENTINE-Greece Home Blood Pressure Monitoring study

BackgroundThis study assessed the diagnostic reliability of automated office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in treated hypertensive patients in primary care by evaluating the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) phenomena.MethodsPrimary care physicians, nationwide in Greece, assessed consecutive hypertensive patients on stable treatment using OBP (1 visit, triplicate measurements) and home blood pressure (HBP) measurements (7 days, duplicate morning and evening measurements). All measurements were performed using validated automated devices with bluetooth capacity (Omron M7 Intelli-IT). Uncontrolled OBP was defined as ≥140/90 mmHg, and uncontrolled HBP was defined as ≥135/85 mmHg.ResultsA total of 790 patients recruited by 135 doctors were analyzed (age: 64.5 ± 14.4 years, diabetics: 21.4%, smokers: 20.6%, and average number of antihypertensive drugs: 1.6 ± 0.8). OBP (137.5 ± 9.4/84.3 ± 7.7 mmHg, systolic/diastolic) was higher than HBP (130.6 ± 11.2/79.9 ± 8 mmHg; difference 6.9 ± 11.6/4.4 ± 7.6 mmHg, p < 0.001). WCH phenomenon (high OBP with low HBP) was observed in 22.7% of the patients, MUCH (low OBP with high HBP) in 15.8%, uncontrolled hypertension (high OBP with high HBP) in 29.9%, and controlled hypertension (low OBP with low HBP) in 31.6%. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, WCH was determined by stage-1 systolic hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 8.6, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 5.7, 13.1) and female gender (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1, 2.4), whereas MUCH was determined by high-normal systolic OBP (OR 6.2, 95% CI 3.8, 10.1) and male gender (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2, 3.1).ConclusionsIn primary care, automated OBP measurements are misleading in approximately 40% of treated hypertensive patients. HBP monitoring is mandatory to avoid overtreatment of subjects with WCH phenomenon and prevent undertreatment and subsequent excess cardiovascular disease in MUCH.     

Out-of-office blood pressure in children and adolescents: disparate findings by using home or ambulatory monitoring

BACKGROUND: The validity of home blood pressure (HBP) measurements in children has not been evaluated, although in clinical practice such measurements are being used. This study compares HBP, with clinic (CBP) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in children and adolescents. METHODS: Fifty-five children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years were evaluated with CBP (three visits), HBP (6 days), and daytime ABP. Mean age was 12.3 +/- 2.9 (SD) years, 33 boys. According to the Task Force CBP criteria, 26 were hypertensives, 6 had high-normal BP (hypertensive group), and 23 were normotensives (normotensive group). RESULTS: In the hypertensive group, CBP was 130.8 +/- 7.6/72.5 +/- 8.1 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic), HBP 118.9 +/- 6.3/73.7 +/- 6.7, and ABP 130.8 +/- 8.1/75.5 +/- 8.3. In the normotensive group, CBP was 112.8 +/- 8/63.1 +/- 6.3, HBP 106.7 +/- 8.4/67.2 +/- 5.2, and ABP 123.9 +/- 7.2/72 +/- 4.3. Strong correlations (P < .001) were observed between CBP-HBP (r = 0.73/0.57, systolic/diastolic), CBP-ABP (r = 0.59/0.49), and HBP-ABP (r = 0.72/0.66). In normotensive subjects, ABP was higher than both CBP and HBP for systolic and diastolic BP (P < .001). Furthermore, systolic HBP was lower than CBP (P < .01), whereas the opposite was true for diastolic BP (P < .05). In hypertensive subjects systolic HBP was lower than both CBP and ABP (P < .001), whereas CBP did not differ from ABP. For diastolic BP no differences were found among measurement methods. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, in contrast to adults in whom HBP is close to the levels of daytime ABP, in children and adolescents HBP appears to be significantly lower than daytime ABP. Until more data become available, caution is needed in the interpretation of HBP in children and adolescents.     

Masked Hypertension Defined by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Is Associated With an Increased Serum Glucose Level and Urinary Albumin‐Creatinine Ratio

J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich). 2010;12:578–587. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The authors evaluated the relationship of hypertensive target organ damage to masked hypertension assessed by ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring in 129 participants without taking antihypertensive medication. Masked hypertension was defined as office BP ≤140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mm Hg. The masked hypertensive participants defined by 24-hour ambulatory BP (n=13) had a higher serum glucose level (126 vs 96 mg/dL, P=.001) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (38.0 vs 7.5 mg/gCr, P<.001) than the normotensive participants (n=74); however, these relationships were not observed when the authors defined groups using HBP (≥135/85 mm Hg). Masked hypertension by both 24-hour ambulatory BP and HBP had a higher urinary albumin-creatinine ratio than normotension by both 24-hour ambulatory BP and HBP (62.1 vs 7.4 mg/gCr, P=.001), and than masked hypertension by HBP alone (9.3 mg/gCr, P=.009). Masked hypertension defined by 24-hour ambulatory BP is associated with an increased serum glucose level and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, but these relationships are not observed in masked hypertension defined by HBP.     

Early changes of left ventricular function in young adults with never-treated hypertension and no left ventricular hypertrophy: relationships to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

The number of young adults with hypertension (HT) is increasing. We investigated the changes of left ventricular (LV) function and their relationship to the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters in young adults with never-treated HT and no LV hypertrophy.

Consecutive young patients (29.5?±?5.9 years) with first diagnosed primary HT and sex- and age-matched normotensive controls were enrolled. We excluded patients who had LV hypertrophy. ABPM was performed in all HT patients. LV strain values were obtained by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.

There was no difference in LV ejection fraction and mass index between HT patients (n?=?40) and controls (n?=?40). LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was lower (p?=?0.001) and twist was higher (p?=?0.002) in HT patients than in controls. LV GLS was significantly correlated to averaged and daytime diastolic BP and its variability and most related to daytime diastolic BP (β?=?0.33, p?=?0.03). Patients with high daytime diastolic BP and its variability showed lower GLS (both p?=?0.02) and higher twist (both p?=?0.04) than patients with low daytime diastolic BP.

Early changes of LV function with decreased GLS and increased twist were shown in young HT patients even with no LV hypertrophy and daytime diastolic BP and its variability were related to the impairment of LV function.     

Transdermal Clonidine Therapy and Blood Pressure Nocturnal Fall in Mild Hypertensive Male Subjects

Treatment of mild hypertension with an antihypertensive drug administered by means of a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) could produce favorable results, when compared with a traditional oral regimen. Purpose: Using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) in mild hypertensive male subjects, to analyze three aspects which have not been completely clarified: a) whether a latency in the antihypertensive effect may be present, recording BP already from the first day of application of the patch, b) the eventual hazardous enhancement of circadian nocturnal fall in BP values in treated mild hypertensive patients and, c) the possible overlapping of antihypertensive effect between the administration of two consecutive patches. Subjects and methods: In 12 caucasian male outpatients (yrs 55 ± 3 SEM) with uncomplicated essential mild hypertension, a patch containing placebo was applied for the first week (T 0 period). At the end of the T 0 period, a 5 mg TTS-2 clonidine patch was applied for one week, and, subsequently, a new patch of 5 mg TTS-2 clonidine was kept for another week. ABPM was performed on the last day of the placebo period (T 0) and on the 1st day (T1), the 7th day (T2) and the 14th day (T3) of transdermal clonidine therapy. Results: Both systolic and diastolic BP (24 h mean, day-night-time) decreased on the 1st, 7th and 14th day, when compared with T0. However, no significant differences were documented between the BP levels on the 1st and the 7th day of treatment. The incidence of nocturnal fall in systolic and diastolic BP was evaluated and no significant differences were found, when compared with night-time reference values. Conclusions: When compared with the placebo period, TTS-2 clonidine lowers SBP and DBP within the first 24 hours of application. The antihypertensive effect persists at the end of the first week, as well as after 14 days. The lowest values of systolic-diastolic BP documented were not below the levels reported in normotensive men. Therefore, TTS-2 clonidine seems to act as an antihypertensive agent rather than a hypotensive drug since it normalizes BP without lowering it below physiological levels.     

Urinary angiotensinogen level is correlated with blood pressure level and proteinuria in patients with masked hypertension

Urinary <AQ: Please check whether all the edits made in this paper convey your intended meaning, and correct if necessary.>angiotensinogen (UAGT) level is an index of the intrarenal-renin angiotensin system status and is significantly correlated with blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria in patients with hypertension (HT). We aimed to investigate the possible relationship between UAGT levels and albuminuria in masked hypertensives. A total of 96 nondiabetic treated hypertensive patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: masked hypertensives (office BP <140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mmHg) and controlled hypertensives (office BP <140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP <130/80). The mean UAGT/UCre level and urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) of masked hypertensives were higher than those of controlled hypertensives (7.76 μg/g vs 4.02 μg/g, p < 0.001 and 174.21 mg/g vs 77.74 mg/g, p < 0.001, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between UAGT/UCre levels and ambulatory systolic BP and diastolic BP levels in patients with masked HT, but this was not found with office SBP or DBP levels. Importantly, UAGT/UCre levels showed a significant positive correlation with UACR in both groups, but correlation of the UAGT levels with UACR was more pronounced in masked hypertensives (r = 0.854, p < 0.001 vsr = 0.512, p < 0.01). As a result, UAGT level was increased in patients with masked HT, which was associated with an elevation in albuminuria. Overproduction of the UAGT may play a pivotal role in development of proteinuria.     

Obesity and left ventricular diastolic function: noninvasive study in normotensives and newly diagnosed never-treated hypertensives

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of obesity, per se or associated with hypertension, on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. PATIENTS: Thirty-two obese newly-diagnosed never-treated hypertensives; 32 obese normotensives matched for age, sex and BMI with hypertensives; 32 lean newly diagnosed never-treated hypertensives and 32 lean normotensives, matched for age, sex and 24 h blood pressure (BP) with the obese subjects. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and digitized M-mode LV echocardiograms. PARAMETERS EVALUATED: Twenty-four-hour, day-time and night-time BP and heart rate, percentage nocturnal BP fall; LV end-diastolic diameter index, septal and posterior wall thickness, LV mass index, peak shortening and lengthening rate of LV diameter, peak thinning rate of LV posterior wall. RESULTS: A main effect was found for obesity on LV diameter and LV mass and for hypertension on LV mass; LV systolic function was normal in all the subjects and similar among the four groups; LV diastolic function was significantly reduced in both obese groups with respect to lean ones. This difference persisted after correction of diastolic parameters for 24 h BP and heart rate, LV diameter and LV mass index and disappeared only after correction for body mass index. This latter was inversely related with diastolic parameters only in the obese groups. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with a preclinical impairment of LV diastolic function in both normotensives and hypertensives; the diastolic impairment is independent of haemodynamic factors, such as 24 h BP and heart rate, and bears no relation to LV geometry in normotensives and only little relation in hypertensives, having therefore to be ascribed to obesity itself.     

Uncontrolled hypertension in older patients: markers and associated factors to masked and white-coat effect

Background Hypertension is the main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, affecting more than half the elderly population. It is essential to know if they have proper control of hypertension. The aim of this study was to identify the associated factors to masked uncontrolled hypertension and false uncontrolled hypertension in older patients. Methods Two-hundred seventy-three individuals (70.1 ± 6.7 years-old) had blood pressure (BP) measured at the office and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), with the definition of controlled group (C), individuals with high office BP and adequate ABPM, called white-coat effect group (WCE), uncontrolled (UC), and subjects with appropriate office BP and elevated ABPM denominated masked effect group (ME). Age, body mass index, diabetes, pulse pressure (PP) and BP dipping during sleep were evaluated (Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression models). Results Age was higher in UC than in C and ME (P < 0.01), and 24-h ABPM PP was lower in C (48 ± 7 mmHg) and WCE (51 ± 6 mmHg) than in UC (67 ± 12 mmHg) and ME (59 ± 8 mmHg) (P < 0.01). Sleep systolic BP dipping was lower in ME than in C (P = 0.03). Female gender was associated with a greater chance of being of ME group, which showed a higher PP and lower BP dipping during sleep. Conclusions In older individuals, office BP measurements did not allow the detection of associated factors that would permit to differentiate WCE from UC group and C from ME group. ABPM favored the identification of a higher PP and a lower BP dipping during sleep in the masked effect and uncontrolled groups.     

Weekly Variation of Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Relation Between Arterial Stiffness and Blood Pressure Measurements in Community-Dwelling Hypertensives

Although blood pressure (BP) is a major determinant of pulse wave velocity (PWV), some treatments have independent effects on BP and arterial stiffness. Although both ambulatory BP (ABP) and self-measured BP at home (HBP) have become important measures for the diagnosis and management of hypertension, single day recordings may be insufficient for a proper diagnosis of hypertension or the evaluation of treatment efficacy. To evaluate weekly variations in BP using 7-day HBP and 7-day ABP monitoring and to determine the relation between arterial stiffness and BP measurements in community-dwelling patients with hypertension. We enrolled 68 community-dwelling hypertensive subjects in this study. Significant weekly variations in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were found in the awake ABP data (p < .01, respectively), while no significant weekly variations in the asleep ABP or the morning and evening HBP data were observed. In untreated subjects, significant correlations were obtained between the brachial-ankle PWV and the average awake SBP, the average asleep SBP and the average SBP measured by HBP in the evening. In treated subjects, only the average SBP measured by HBP in the morning was significantly correlated with the baPWV. Differences in the weekly variations in BP were observed between HBP and ABP monitoring. In addition, the morning systolic HBP was not correlated with arterial stiffness in untreated subjectswith hypertension but was correlated in treated subjects. Relations between the morning HBP and arterial stiffness might be attributed to morning surges in BP and/or trough levels of antihypertensive drugs.     

Differential blood pressure effects of oral glucose and intravenous L-arginine in healthy lean normotensive and obese hypertensive subjects

We investigated the role of insulin and glucose in the pathophysiology of hypertension associated with obesity. The comparative effects of an oral glucose load and of an L-arginine infusion on plasma glucose, plasma insulin and blood pressures (BP) were assessed in lean normotensive and in obese hypertensive males. Oral glucose (75 g in 1-2 min) induced a small but significant lowering of BP in lean normotensives, but failed to modify BP in obese hypertensives. L-arginine infusion (30 min, 500 mg/kg total dose) reduced BP; significantly greater reductions in systolic and diastolic BP were observed in obese hypertensives than in the control group. Both oral glucose and L-arginine induced greater increases in plasma insulin in obese hypertensives than in lean normotensives. Endothelial dysfunction which accompanies the insulin resistant state of obesity, glucose intolerance and hypertension, may account for the different BP effects induced by glucose and L-arginine in obese hypertensives and lean normotensives.     

Insufficient control of morning home blood pressure in Japanese patients with hypertension associated with diabetes mellitus

Aims/Introduction: The combination of hypertension with diabetes mellitus (DM) has been recognized as a critical risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We investigated the blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients with DM (HDM patients) compared with those without DM (HnDM patients). Furthermore, we examined the effect of risk factors, including chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stroke, on the management of both office blood pressure (OBP) and morning home blood pressure (MHBP). Materials and Methods: OBP and MHBP were evaluated in 1230 essential hypertensive patients in 30 institutions. Among them, 366 (30%) were complicated with DM. Results: The ratio of masked hypertensives whose systolic OBP was <140 mmHg and systolic MHBP was more than 135 mmHg in HDM patients was significantly higher than that in HnDM patients (P < 0.02). HDM patients had significantly lower systolic and diastolic OBP and diastolic MHBP than HnDM patients (P < 0.05, respectively). However, systolic MHBP in HDM patients tended to be higher compared with HnDM patients (P = 0.0623). A stratified analysis showed that HDM patients with CKD or stroke had significantly higher systolic MHBP than others (P < 0.05, respectively). The adjusted odds ratio for morning hypertension defined by a systolic MHBP more than 135 mmHg was significantly higher in the HDM patients with CKD (1.98) compared with HnDM patients without CKD (reference). Conclusions: Diabetes, CKD and stroke are risk factors for MHBP. More intensive treatment is needed to achieve the thera‐peutic goal for systolic MHBP in HDM patients, especially those who are complicated with CKD or stroke. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00056.x, 2010) .     

Trend of office and home blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: changes in antihypertensive medication and salt intake

Blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensives has improved in recent years; however, it remains insufficient. We investigated the trend of BP control status in hypertensive patients with antihypertensive medication and salt intake. Two hundred and eight treated hypertensive patients were prospectively followed between 2007 and 2012. During this period, average clinic BP significantly decreased from 137?±?12/80?±?9 to 133?±?11/76?±?8?mmHg, and the achievement rate of BP control defined as <140/90?mmHg increased from 58% to 71% (p?p?p?相似文献   

Is resistant hypertension really resistant?

BACKGROUND: Managing resistant hypertension is difficult and mostly involves expensive testing seeking an underlying secondary cause. This study was undertaken to determine 1) the extent of the white-coat phenomenon in patients with resistant hypertension, and 2) whether 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) or having BP recorded by a nurse instead of the referring doctor could clarify how many apparently resistant hypertensives actually have controlled BP. METHODS: This study involved 611 patients with BP > or = 140/90 mm Hg who were referred for 24-h ABPM by their specialist or general practitioner, including 277 patients who were taking no antihypertensives (group 1), 216 taking one or two antihypertensive drugs (group 2), and 118 taking at least three antihypertensives in combination (group 3). Each had BP recorded by one of two nurses before 24-h ABPM. Controlled BP was defined as awake ambulatory BP <135/85 mm Hg and the white-coat effect was the difference between the BP recorded by the referring doctor or nurse and the average awake ambulatory BP. RESULTS: Those with resistant hypertension (group 3) were older (61 years (12) v group 1: 46 years (14) and group 2: 56 (14) years; P < .001), but were of similar weight, height, and arm circumference to the other groups. Referral systolic, but not diastolic BP was higher in resistant hypertensives (mean 171/95 v 154/95 mm Hg and 164/94 mm Hg, respectively, P < .001 for systolic BP only). Twenty-eight percent of resistant hypertensives and 32% of those taking no antihypertensive drugs had normal awake ambulatory BP and the white-coat effect attributable to the referring doctor was always greater than that due to the nurse (range 16 to 26/12 to 14 mm Hg v 9 to 17/4 mm Hg, P < .001). Nurse recorded BP was highly sensitive (97%) in identifying awake hypertension but lacked specificity (57%) to replace ABPM. CONCLUSION: Our results show that approximately one in four patients with apparent resistant hypertension referred for ABPM have controlled BP and one-third of patients referred for initial evaluation of office or clinic hypertension have normal BP using ABPM, ie, white-coat hypertension. Twenty-four-hour ABPM appears an appropriate initial step before further investigating or treating patients with apparently resistant hypertension.