Emerging biological therapies for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

Introduction: No drug has resulted in a survival advantage in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). While hypomethylating agents (HMA) have revolutionized treatment options for patients with higher-risk MDS, the prognosis remains dismal after HMA treatment failure. Novel effective therapies are urgently needed especially after HMA failure.

Areas covered: This review covers the current approach to disease prognostication and risk-adaptive therapy, as well as novel therapeutic approaches. We discuss the recent advancements in the understanding of MDS disease biology as a basis of targeted drug development. Several classes of novel agents are reviewed including drugs targeting dysregulated epigenetic control mechanisms, signaling pathways, abnormal splicing, as well as agents that target the immune system and the MDS bone marrow niche.

Expert opinion: Significant advancements in the understanding of the underlying biology of MDS are only starting to be translated into novel treatment options for MDS. Epigenetic therapy has shown significant clinical activity with HMA but the results of clinical trials combining HMAs with histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have been disappointing to date. Similarly, targeting several aberrant pathways in MDS has not resulted in significant improvements in therapy. Future therapies will focus both on synergic combination of existing drugs as well as novel agents targeting dysregulated immune responses and abnormal RNA splicing in MDS.     

Current and emerging systemic therapies for cutaneous metastatic melanoma

Introduction: Melanoma therapies have evolved rapidly, and initial successes have translated into survival gains for patients with advanced melanoma. Both targeted and immune-therapy now have evidence in earlier stage disease. There are many new agents and combinations of treatments in development as potential future treatment options. This highlights the need for a reflection on current treatment practice trends that are guiding the development of potential new therapies.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the evidence for currently approved therapies for cutaneous melanoma, including adjuvant therapy, potential new biomarkers, and emerging treatments with early phase clinical trial data. The authors have searched both the PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases for published clinical trials and discuss selected landmark trials of current therapies and of investigational treatment strategies with early evidence for the treatment of melanoma.

Expert opinion: Significant efficacy has been demonstrated with both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in treating advanced melanoma. A multitude of novel therapies are in development and there is need for instructive biomarker assessment to identify patients likely to respond or be refractory to current therapies, to identify mechanisms of resistance and to direct further treatment options to patients based on individual disease biology.     

Molecular targeted therapy for patients with melanoma: the promise of MAPK pathway inhibition and beyond

Importance of the field: Recent discoveries have expanded the understanding of the molecular signaling events critical to melanomagenesis and led to the development of targeted therapeutic agents that are revolutionizing the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.

Areas covered in this review: This article reviews current therapy and its limitations, describes the key pathogenic mechanisms in melanoma for which inhibitors have been tested, and summarizes the results of clinical trials involving molecularly targeted agents in this disease.

What the reader will gain: There has been an explosion of preclinical and clinical research aimed at targeting the key molecular alterations in melanoma for therapeutic benefit. These findings will be presented and placed in the proper clinical context, affording information regarding the current molecular targets in the melanoma and the activity and limitations of therapeutic agents directed against them.

Take home message: Greater understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying melanoma development has prompted the development of new therapeutic approaches aimed at counteracting these processes. While progress made over the past few years has generated considerable excitement, the benefits of these new therapies are still limited by incomplete and transient tumor regressions. It is hoped that with further investigation, particularly into mechanisms of treatment de novo and acquired treatment resistance, these limitations can be overcome.     

The safety of current and emerging therapies for multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Multiple myeloma therapy has evolved significantly over the past several decades due to the discovery of numerous novel agents. These targeted agents are highly effective but differ in their toxicity profiles. This literature review will highlight the safety of current and emerging myeloma therapy.

Areas covered: Therapeutic agents that are reviewed for safety and efficacy data include alkylators, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, nuclear export inhibitor, and histone deacetylase inhibitor. Emerging studies of BCL2 inhibitors and immune therapies targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) such as CAR T-cell therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates will also be reviewed.

Expert opinion: As myeloma therapy continues to evolve, new questions arise such as sequencing of therapy, the role of stem cell transplantation, duration and appropriate choice of maintenance therapy, as well as timing of utilization of immunotherapeutic approaches. Comprehensive understanding of the toxicity profile of these agents is crucial in selecting the best therapy for patients.     

Programming the immune checkpoint to treat hematologic malignancies

Introduction: Hematologic malignancies manipulate the immune suppressive pathways involving CTLA-4, PD-1, and others to promote immune tolerance of cancer. New monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints are showing meaningful responses in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The basis for success of anti-PD-1 therapy appears to be expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells and cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME). While adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are capable of generating auto-immune phenomena, in general these therapies are well tolerated.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and activators which hold promise as useful therapies in malignancies of hematologic origin, since many exploit endogenous pathways to induce tolerance. By programming the immune response to attack hematologic malignancies, unique regimens can be developed to optimally treat patients with curative potential.

Expert opinion: The utilization of immune checkpoint targeting agents to boost the innate and acquired immune systems to eradicate human malignancies represents a unique opportunity to develop novel therapies with increased clinical efficacy. Side effects of these therapies come with the price of auto-immune phenomena that require appropriate management.     

Building on the anti-PD1/PD-L1 backbone: combination immunotherapy for cancer

Introduction: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Given this growing success, at the same time, there are significant limitations and unanswered questions concerning response rates, duration of therapy, why some patients respond and others do not, and if combining different immune-agents would overcome this lack of response, increase the chance of success and postpone acquired resistance.

Areas covered: The comprehension of how to properly modulate the immune pathways, the molecular and the immunological bases of the disease, will be fundamental to guide the development of therapeutic interventions and combinations that will be more suitable for treatment of cancer patients. In this review, we discuss the strategies of immunotherapy combinations in order to develop more effective immunotherapy programs, with a particular focus on melanoma and renal cancer patients, as well as the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Expert Opinion: Given the complexity of immune activation, combinatorial approaches are needed, and due to the considerable variability in tumor biology across patients and tumor types, patient selection and biomarkers need to be further explored. In summary, combined therapies have shown promising success, but additional and continuous research to identify the safety, efficacy, optimal combination, dosage and timing are still required.     

Advances in systemic delivery of anti-cancer agents for the treatment of metastatic cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The successful treatment of metastatic cancer is refractory to strategies employed to treat confined, primary lesions, such as surgical resection and radiation therapy, and thus must be addressed by systemic delivery of anti-cancer agents. Conventional systemically administered chemotherapeutics are often ineffective and come with severe dose-limiting toxicities.

Areas covered: This review focuses on the recent developments in systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Firstly, the strategies employed to improve the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutics by ‘passively’ and ‘actively’ targeting them to tumors are discussed. Secondly, recent advances in the use of biologics to better target cancer and to instigate anti-tumor immunity are reviewed. Under the label of ‘biologics’, antibody-therapies, T cell engaging therapies, oncolytic virotherapies and cell-based therapies are examined and evaluated.

Expert opinion: Improving specificity of action, and engaging the immune system appear to be key goals in the development of novel or reformulated anti-cancer agents for the treatment of metastatic cancer. One of the largest areas of opportunity in this field will be the identification of robust predictive biomarkers for use in conjunction with these agents. Treatment regimens that combine an agent to elicit an immune response (such as an oncolytic virus), and an agent to potentiate/mediate that immune response (such as immune checkpoint inhibitors) are predicted to be more effective than treatment with either agent alone.     

Cytokines for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers: clinical experience and new perspectives

Introduction: Cytokines are key mediators of the immune system and have been proposed as therapeutic agents against cancer, either as recombinant proteins, or as transgenes in gene therapy approaches. Stimulation of immune responses against cancer cells is an appealing method to treat tumors with high risk of relapse and systemic dissemination.

Areas covered: We provide a critical overview of clinical trials involving the use of cytokines for the treatment of liver, colon and pancreatic cancers. Special attention has been paid to advances in the field of gene therapy and oncolytic viruses. The potential of new developments still in a pre-clinical stage is also discussed. We have revised public sources of information (PubMed, US National Institutes of Health clinical trials database) up to January 2013.

Expert opinion: The complexity of the immune system and the unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties of cytokines limit the efficacy of these molecules as single agents for the treatment of cancer. Expression from gene therapy vectors, together with new methods of targeting and stabilization, may overcome these hurdles. We believe cytokines will play a crucial role as part of combined approaches, enhancing the action of adoptive cell immunotherapy, oncolytic viruses or biological therapies.     

Stimulation of Brain Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors (nAChR) and Inhibition of Brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Activity

Introduction: The Fas/FasL system plays a significant role in tumorigenesis. Research has shown that its impairment in cancer cells may lead to apoptosis resistance and contribute to tumor progression. Thus, the development of effective therapies targeting the Fas/FasL system may play an important role in the fight against cancer.

Areas covered: In this review the recent literature on targeting the Fas/FasL system for therapeutic exploitation at different levels is reviewed. Promising pre-clinical approaches and various exceptions are highlighted. The potential of combined therapies is also explored, whereby tumor sensitivity to Fas-mediated apoptosis is restored, before an effective targeted therapy is employed.

Expert opinion: The success of the Fas/FasL system targeting for therapeutics will require a better understanding of the alterations conferring resistance, in order to use the most appropriate sensitizing chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic agents in combination with effective targeted therapies.     

An update: emerging drugs to treat squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Subsequent to the 2006 FDA approval of cetuximab, a variety of molecular targeting agents have been evaluated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The treatment outcomes of recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC, in particular, remain dismal. The 2016 FDA approval of PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors has expanded the treatment options for R/M HNSCC and highlights the potential for immune-based therapies.

Areas covered: We will review the clinical application of EGFR-targeted agents, alone and in combination with other drugs. Molecular targeting agents directed against the IL6/PI3K/STAT3 signaling pathway will be covered. In addition, evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HNSCC, along with ongoing combination trials incorporating these agents, will be discussed. The expanded indications of emerging drugs and the potential clinical benefit of new drugs and treatment combinations will be summarized.

Expert opinion: In recent years, there has been a major shift toward immunotherapy-based approaches for the treatment of HNSCC, leading to significant improvements in outcomes for a subset of patients. Leveraging the increased understanding of the genetic alterations that characterize individual HNSCC tumors will facilitate precision medicine approaches using targeted agents, immunotherapies, as well as standard chemotherapy and radiation.     

Current advances in BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Introduction: The current first line therapy for high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG). Patients who recur or progress despite BCG are recommended to undergo radical cystectomy or participate in clinical trials. There is an urgent need for alternative therapies in the BCG-unresponsive NMIBC realm.

Areas covered: We queried clinicaltrials.gov and pubmed.gov for current and recently completed early clinical trials pertaining to investigational agents used for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. These included intravesical chemotherapy, immunotherapy, vaccines, gene therapy, viruses, and agents used with novel drug delivery methods. In this article, we discuss the treatment guidelines for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and therapeutic approaches under investigation in clinical trials.

Expert opinion: The FDA is currently allowing single-arm studies as a pathway for approval in BCG-refractory patients with CIS. Although many agents are currently undergoing testing, none have been approved since Valrubicin. Hopefully, we will identify therapies sufficiently effective and durable to achieve FDA approval. Other considerations in this realm include the use of biomarkers in NMIBC to identify patients who will most likely respond to specific interventions. In addition, as systemic agents such as checkpoint inhibitors, are studied further, a multidisciplinary approach may be needed to treat this subset of patients     

The IL-17-Th1/Th17 pathway: an attractive target for lung cancer therapy?

Introduction: There is strong pharmaceutical development of agents targeting the IL-17–TH17 pathway for the treatment of psoriasis (Ps) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Lung cancer accounts for 28% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide, and roughly 80% of patients with newly-diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease, with a poor prognosis of around 12 months. Therefore, there is a high unmet medical need for the development of new and potent systemic treatments in this deadly disease. The emergence of immunotherapies such as anti-PD-1 or anti-PDL1 as candidate therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) indicates that targeting critical immuno-modulatory cytokines including those within the IL-17-Th1/Th17 axis may have proven benefit in the treatment of lung cancer.

Areas covered: In this review we describe the current evidence for aberrant IL-17-Th1/Th17 settings in cancer, particularly with regard to targeting this axis in NSCLC. We further discuss the current agents under pharmaceutical development which could potentially target this axis, and discuss the current limitations and areas of concern regarding the use of these in lung cancer.

Expert opinion: Current evidence suggests that moving forward agents targeting the IL-17-Th1/Th17 pathway may have novel new oncoimmunology indications in the treatment paradigm for NSCLC.     

Emerging drugs for squamous cell lung cancer

Introduction: The management of advanced NSCLC has been shifted by histology-driven treatment and molecularly targeted therapy, especially in lung adenocarcinoma. However, as the second most common histology in NSCLC, the treatment options for squamous cell lung cancer (SQCLC) remain very limited.

Areas covered: The review first discusses the role of histology in management of NSCLC and new cytotoxic agents in SQCLC, and then addresses genomic characterization and potential molecular targets in SQCLC. The article then provides an overview for several major categories of novel molecularly targeted therapies and immune-based strategies with particular attention to ongoing SQCLC trials.

Expert opinion: The key challenges in drug development are to uncover novel actionable targets and to identify predictive biomarkers. Progress in genomic analysis has identified some promising targetable genes and oncogenic pathways in SQCLC with a wave of targeted agents being tested in clinical trials. Immunotherapy has also raised great interest in management of SQCLC, especially agents targeting immune check points, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed death-1 receptor and its ligands. Better understanding of tumor biology and development of novel targeted therapies will help to facilitate more effective personalized therapy for patients with this devastating illness.     

Pharmacotherapy of regional melanoma therapy

Importance of the field: In-transit melanoma metastases develop within regional dermal and subdermal lymphatics before reaching the regional lymph nodes. The prognosis is poor and comparable to multiple nodal metastases. Isolated limb infusion (ILI) or perfusion (ILP) are effective treatments for unresectable, in-transit melanoma, with response rates reaching 95%. Although ILI and ILP are more effective than systemic therapy, most patients will recur, thus highlighting the need for newer strategies to improve durable response rates.

Areas covered in this review: We review historical and current literature from 1958 to 2009 regarding regional therapy for melanoma, with focus on the ILI and ILP techniques, pharmacokinetics and resistance mechanisms of melphalan. Alternative therapies, adjunct strategies and new targeted therapies aimed at improving response rates and long-term remission are also discussed.

What the reader will gain: The reader will gain a comprehensive review on regional pharmacotherapy for melanoma, including alternative therapies, adjunct strategies and new targeted therapies.

Take home message: Regional chemotherapy is a viable, evolving treatment for patients with in-transit melanoma and a springboard for ongoing research aimed at improving therapies for malignant melanoma.     

Emerging monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

Introduction: Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was considered refractory to most cancer therapies until the 1980s, after which immune modulating agents and targeted agents were developed. Recently the rapid development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoint pathways has provided significant clinical benefit in patients with many distinct cancer types. Nivolumab, an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody showed improvement in response rate and overall survival in patients with previously treated RCC and received US FDA approval in late 2015. Current efforts with anti-PD1-based therapy include combinations with ipilimumab and with VEGF pathway blockers in the hopes on building on the activity of single agent therapy.

Areas covered: We describe our current understanding of tumor immunology including the basis of the tumor-specific immune response and the adaptive mechanisms used by the tumor for immune escape. We describe the mechanisms of action as well as the therapeutic application of the antibodies, ipilimumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab in patients with RCC. We identify key areas of active research in biomarker development and combination therapies.

Expert opinion: Clinical trials and the field of RCC therapeutics are expected to move in the direction of combination therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors, extending overall survival as a benchmark for new drug approvals, and biomarker validation for improved selection of patients for specific therapies.     

Approaches for targeting cancer stem cells drug resistance

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Several reports have suggested that a population of undifferentiated cells known as cancer stem cells (CSCs), is responsible for cancer formation and maintenance. In the last decade, the presence of CSCs in solid cancers have been reported.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the main approaches for targeting CSCs drug resistance. It is indeed known that CSCs may contribute to resistance to conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted agents. Among the mechanisms by which CSCs escape anticancer therapies, removal of therapeutic agents by drug efflux pumps, enhanced DNA damage repair, activation of mitogenic/anti-apoptotic pathways; the main features of CSCs, stemness and EMT, are involved, as well as the capability to evade immune response.

Expert opinion: Different approaches are suitable to target CSCs mediated drug resistance. Some of them are currently under clinical evaluation in different cancer types. A better understanding of CSC biology, as well as more accurate study design, may maximize the therapeutic effects of these agents. In this respect, it is important to establish: (i) which molecules should be targeted; (ii) what drug combinations may be suitable; (iii) which patient settings will CSC targeting offer the highest clinical benefit; and (iv) how to integrate therapeutic approaches targeting CSCs with standard cancer therapy.     

Current investigational drugs in psoriasis

Introduction : The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. Increased understanding of immunogenetic pathways has allowed for the development of more selective targeted biologic therapies. Multiple new treatments are currently in development for the treatment of psoriasis. Preliminary data for many of these agents, particularly with regard to agents targeting the IL-23/Th17 pathway, are promising. Proven long-term safety, however, is an absolute necessity with newly developed drugs, and should, therefore, still be considered second-line agents to current established treatments with long-term safety data.

Areas covered : This review details the mechanisms of action of drugs currently in development or in clinical trials for the treatment of psoriasis, using clinical trial registries and associated publications. Readers will gain a comprehensive overview about the mechanism of action of emerging treatments targeting various immune pathways deeply involved in psoriasis. Pathogenesis, clinical efficacy and safety data for these treatments are discussed where available.

Expert opinion : Psoriasis remains a heavily undertreated systemic immune-mediated disease despite increased understanding of immunopathogenesis of the disease and advent of a multitude of novel therapeutic agents with potentially improved bioavailability and safety profiles. Limitations, however, remain in the realm of topical agents for treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis, which has seen little progress over the years. A concerted effort will need to be made among researchers, clinicians and patient advocacy groups to ensure new therapeutic agents are developed and gain proper exposure.     

An update on the up and coming therapies to treat osteoarthritis,a multifaceted disease

Introduction: The lack of a complete understanding of the complex processes involved in the etiopathogenesis and subsequent appropriate phenotyping makes it difficult to find therapies that may be efficacious in most patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Consensus recommendations involve mainly non-pharmacological approaches. Analgesics and NSAIDs are considered second choice options due to their poor efficacy/safety ratios. To some extent, OA may be considered an orphan disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify effective and safe new pharmacologic modalities for treating OA.

Areas covered: This review is based on a Medline comprehensive literature search for published articles evaluating new formulations of current drugs and promising emerging therapies in OA. We discuss the current status of novel systemic agents in development including potent analgesic options, inhibitors of innate immunity, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), pro-inflammatory cytokines and cartilage proteases as well as bone agents. Furthermore, we also revise the potential benefit of intraarticular (IA) therapy with hyaluronic acid (HA), pro-inflammatory mediator blockers, cartilage anabolic agents, mesenchymal stem cell and gene transfer.

Expert opinion: Despite the renewed interest in the search of new compounds for treatment of OA, results have been limited. Novel systemic and IA administered agents are in active development. IA drug administration is particularly an attractive approach because can diminish some of the severe side effects associated with systemic drugs. Indeed, one of the most promising fields for pharmacology innovation in OA is joint injected therapy, as suggested by preliminary data from recent studies using IA sprifermin (rhFGF-18), mesenchymal stem cells or TGF-B1 transduced allogenic chondrocytes. Last, the effort to develop new drugs must be accompanied by the interest for establishing well-defined phenotypes, and only then, a more tailored therapy should be practiced in OA.     

Drug design strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer

Introduction: While metastatic prostate cancer remains an incurable tumor, remarkable progress has been made with novel drug design strategies for this incurable disease. Several new agents, including hormonal analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, radionuclides and innovative targeted therapies, have recently been approved by the FDA for use in advanced and/or metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Furthermore, a growing number of new diagnostic or predictive genetic tests have also been incorporated into the management of this disease. Immunotherapy-based approaches have shown promise and have led to drug approvals. Other experimental approaches such as vascular targeting are in early translational clinical trials.

Areas covered: Herein, the authors outline select state-of-the-art approaches in the field. They also discuss the current challenges and future opportunities in the medical care of prostate cancer patients.

Expert opinion: An inherent challenge in the treatment of prostate cancer is to determine which patients need immediate aggressive treatment versus active surveillance. For patients needing aggressive treatment, integrating the sequence of therapeutic interventions, to provide the most benefit, remains a challenge that clinicians face. Recently, several genetic tests have been approved, facilitating early treatment decisions. Innovative targeted therapies are moving towards clinical applications, providing treatment options for tumors previously considered refractory to androgen ablation treatment.     

In pursuit of a moving target: nanotherapeutics for the treatment of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma

Introduction: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is diagnosed in 70,000 Americans annually. Chemotherapy was the standard course of treatment until the addition of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) drug, rituximab, to therapy regimens in 1997. Although disease prognosis has improved dramatically since that time, nearly 20,000 patients succumb annually to the disease, with an average life expectancy beyond diagnosis of only 12 years. The advent of nanomedicine may fulfill the remaining need for novel therapy capable of eradicating solid tumor and disseminated B-cell lymphomas.

Areas covered: This review details the current landscape of B-cell NHL and nanoparticles now being developed for its treatment. Specifically, we discuss lipid, polymer and metal nanoparticles that deliver an array of drugs, including toxins, chemotherapeutic agents and nucleic acids.

Expert opinion: Because B-cell malignancies have responded quite well to new components in multi-drug regimens, nanomedicines that are mechanistically distinct from existing therapies hold significant promise. In our opinion, advancement of these technologies into the clinic will likely require significantly more effective targeting systems coupled with a better understanding of lymphoma biology. Furthermore, it is important for researchers to recognize the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of NHL and to develop therapeutic strategies for distinct subsets of NHL before attempting to generalize approaches.