BRAF and MEK inhibition for the treatment of advanced BRAF mutant melanoma

Introduction: BRAF inhibition alone has achieved unprecedented efficacy results in patients affected by BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. Since these findings, it was postulated that dual inhibition of BRAF and other components of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK MAPK pathway (such as MEK) would be superior to BRAF inhibition as monotherapy. A series of recent clinical trials have confirmed this hypothesis.

Areas covered: In this article, the biological rationale for both single and concomitant inhibitions of the MAPK pathway in BRAF mutant melanoma is provided. Moreover, available clinical data on the efficacy and toxicity of BRAF and MEK inhibition as single agents and in combination are extensively reviewed.

Expert opinion: Dual BRAF and MEK inhibition in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma is superior to single inhibition in terms of efficacy without significant increase in toxicity. Therefore, BRAF plus MEK inhibition is expected to supersede single-agent BRAF inhibition in these patients in the near future.     

Update on BRAF and MEK inhibition for treatment of melanoma in metastatic,unresectable, and adjuvant settings

Introduction: Selective inhibition of the MAPK pathway with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has emerged as a key component of the treatment of BRAF-mutant unresectable/locally advanced metastatic melanoma.

Areas covered: Current data are presented on the efficacy and safety of BRAFi + MEKi combination therapy (dabrafenib/trametinib, vemurafenib/cobimetinib, and encorafenib/binimetinib) from phase I, II, and III trials in the unresectable/locally advanced metastatic setting, as well as neoadjuvant and adjuvant applications. The theoretical basis, pre-clinical findings, clinical trial results and current ongoing clinical studies of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition with immunotherapy, also known as ‘triplet therapy,’ are also explored.

Expert opinion: Combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors dramatically improves response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma compared to historical treatments such as chemotherapy. Some serious adverse effects, including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, are attenuated with combination therapy, while less severe and reversible effects including pyrexia, left ventricular dysfunction, and ocular events can be more common with combination therapy. Existing data are insufficient to recommend triplet therapy, or a particular treatment sequence, with respect to BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune therapies, though results from multiple ongoing trials are anticipated.     

Current and emerging systemic therapies for cutaneous metastatic melanoma

Introduction: Melanoma therapies have evolved rapidly, and initial successes have translated into survival gains for patients with advanced melanoma. Both targeted and immune-therapy now have evidence in earlier stage disease. There are many new agents and combinations of treatments in development as potential future treatment options. This highlights the need for a reflection on current treatment practice trends that are guiding the development of potential new therapies.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the evidence for currently approved therapies for cutaneous melanoma, including adjuvant therapy, potential new biomarkers, and emerging treatments with early phase clinical trial data. The authors have searched both the PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases for published clinical trials and discuss selected landmark trials of current therapies and of investigational treatment strategies with early evidence for the treatment of melanoma.

Expert opinion: Significant efficacy has been demonstrated with both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in treating advanced melanoma. A multitude of novel therapies are in development and there is need for instructive biomarker assessment to identify patients likely to respond or be refractory to current therapies, to identify mechanisms of resistance and to direct further treatment options to patients based on individual disease biology.     

Emerging targeted therapies for glioma

Introduction: Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults. Despite aggressive treatment with surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, these tumors are incurable and invariably recur. Molecular characterization of these tumors in recent years has advanced our understanding of gliomagenesis and offered an array of pathways that can be specifically targeted.

Areas covered: The most commonly dysregulated signaling pathways found in gliomas will be discussed, as well as the biologic importance of these disrupted pathways and how each may contribute to tumor development. Our knowledge regarding these pathways are most relevant to Grade IV glioma/glioblastoma, but we will also discuss genomic categorization of low grade glioma. Further, drugs targeting single pathways, which have undergone early phase clinical trials will be reviewed, followed by an in depth discussion of emerging treatments on the horizon, which will include inhibitors of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and receptor tyrosine kinases, Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase (PI3K), angiogenesis, cell cycle and mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations.

Expert opinion: Results from single agent targeted therapy trials have been modest. Lack of efficacy may stem from a combination of poor blood brain barrier penetration, the genetically heterogeneous make-up of the tumors and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. These factors can be overcome by rational drug design that capitalizes on ways to target critical pathways and limits upregulation of redundant pathways.     

Future of combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma

Introduction: Combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is a recommended treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma patients with BRAF^V600 mutations. This treatment provides significant response rates and little added toxicity, with relatively improved survival outcomes compared to RAF/MEK inhibitor monotherapy and chemotherapy.

Areas covered: This review covers the pharmacology, efficacy, and toxicity data derived from clinical studies of dabrafenib, trametinib, and the combination thereof. The major downfall of combiDT is the limited durability of response, which is largely due to acquired resistance in the MAPK pathway.

Expert opinion: Future directions of combiDT concentrate on further combinations with immunotherapy or other targeted inhibitors, referred to triple-agent therapy, which may be essential to improving durability of responses and overcoming resistance.     

Emerging biological therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with unpredictable disease course, intermingled with periods of remission and exacerbation. Current therapies for SLE are not ideal in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Although the prognosis of the disease has improved in the past decades, further improvement is hindered by the occurrence of organ damage as a result of persistent disease activity and treatment-related complications. Novel biological therapies targeting at higher treatment efficacy and fewer adverse effects are being developed.

Areas covered: This review summarizes recent data on novel biological therapies for SLE. The pitfalls of clinical trial design and future directions of the development of SLE therapeutics are discussed.

Expert opinion: The variable therapeutic response observed in SLE reflects the clinical and immunological heterogeneity of the disease. The treatment plan of SLE patients should be individualized, with the target of quenching out disease activity, minimizing disease flares, and treatment related morbidities. Despite the disappointment of recent clinical trials, avenues are being opened for novel agents that intervene at different levels of the pathophysiological cascade of SLE. With the availability of a new treatment armamentarium, it is hoped that the survival rate and quality of life of SLE patients can continue to improve.     

Emerging BRAF inhibitors for melanoma

Introduction: The clinical activity of BRAF inhibitor (BRAF-I) therapy is a major breakthrough in the treatment of metastatic melanoma carrying BRAF mutations. However, the therapeutic efficacy of BRAF-I therapy is limited due to the onset of intrinsic and acquired drug resistance.

Areas covered: The role of wild-type BRAF in melanocytes and of the mutated BRAF in the pathogenesis of melanoma is described in this article. The results obtained with BRAF-I in patients with mutated BRAF are reviewed. The mechanisms driving the intrinsic and acquired BRAF-I resistance, the development of combinatorial strategies designed to overcome them and their potential limitations are discussed. Lastly, the many questions that have to be addressed to optimize therapy with BRAF-I are listed.

Expert opinion: Melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer characterized by poor prognosis and high mortality. The discovery of BRAF mutations which drive melanoma tumorigenesis and the development of agents which selectively inhibit mutant-activated BRAF represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, the development of drug resistance underlies the need of more effective and individualized combinatorial treatments to counteract the multiple escape mechanisms utilized by BRAF-mutant melanoma. Although combinatorial strategies using agents which target different protumorigenic signaling pathway components have been shown to increase the clinical efficacy of BRAF-I, novel strategies which utilize different antitumor mechanisms are needed.     

Emerging insights into resistance to BRAF inhibitors in melanoma

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. The treatment of patients with advanced melanoma is rapidly evolving due to an improved understanding of molecular drivers of this disease. Somatic mutations in BRAF are the most common genetic alteration found in these tumors. Recently, two different mutant-selective small molecule inhibitors of BRAF, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, have gained regulatory approval based on positive results in randomized phase III trials. While the development of these agents represents a landmark in the treatment of melanoma, the benefit of these agents is limited by the frequent and rapid onset of resistance. The identification of several molecular mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibitors is rapidly leading to the clinical testing of combinatorial strategies to improve the clinical benefit of these agents. These mechanisms, and the lessons learned from the initial testing of the BRAF inhibitors, provide multiple insights that may facilitate the development of targeted therapies against other oncogenic mutations in melanoma, as well as in other cancers.     

Dabrafenib for the treatment of melanoma

Introduction: Approximately 50% of patients with cutaneous melanoma have an activating mutation in BRAF kinase, leading to constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and unregulated cell growth. Selective inhibitors of the mutated BRAF kinase produce response rates of approximately 50% with median progression-free survival of 6 – 7 months. BRAF-blocking therapies work rapidly, with responses seen within 2 weeks after therapy initiation, and they are associated with generally mild toxicities. The BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib recently was approved for use in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma.

Areas covered: This article discusses the mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes as well as clinical efficacy and safety of dabrafenib for treatment of patients with advanced melanoma including unresectable stage IIIc and stage IV patients who harbor a BRAF V600 mutation. Clinical trial data are reviewed, and efficacy of dabrafenib in patients with brain metastases and in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib is discussed.

Expert opinion: Despite rapid and significant tumor reduction in a majority of patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma who are treated with dabrafenib, this drug’s use as a single agent is limited because of its relatively short duration of response. Various combinations with drug(s) inhibiting other target kinases and/or with immunomodulating agent(s) will likely be the standard in the near future.     

Cobimetinib and vemurafenib for the treatment of melanoma

Introduction: Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib is a new approved MEK inhibitor for first line treatment of metastatic melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. It improves tumor response rates and progression free survival compared to vemurafenib alone, while decreasing toxicities due to the paradoxical activation of the MAPK signaling pathway.

Areas covered: This review covers the pharmacology, efficacy, and toxicity data derived from clinical and preclinical studies on cobimetinib. It also reports ongoing trials evaluating cobimetinib to better understand future developments for this drug.

Expert opinion: The combination of cobimetinib and vemurafenib seems to be more toxic than the combination therapy dabrafenib and trametinib even if these four drugs have never been compared in a randomized trial. The future of this combination depends on its capacity to be combined simultaneously or sequentially with immune based therapies to improve the durability of responses.     

Promising molecular targeted therapies in breast cancer

In recent years, there has been a significant improvement in the understanding of molecular events and critical pathways involved in breast cancer. This has led to the identification of novel targets and development of anticancer therapies referred to as targeted therapy. Targeted therapy has high specificity for the molecules involved in key molecular events that are responsible for cancer phenotype such as cell growth, survival, migration, invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, cell-cycle progression, and angiogenesis. Targeted agents that have been approved for breast cancer include trastuzumab and lapatinib, directed against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and bevacizumab, directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Several other targeted agents currently under evaluation in preclinical and clinical trials include inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitors, VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors, and agents that interfere with crucial signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/MEK/ERK; agents against other tyrosine kinases such as Src, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-receptor (IGFR); agents that promote apoptosis such as Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors; agents that target invasion and metastasis such as matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors and others. In this review, we highlight the most promising targeted agents and their combination with mainstream chemotherapeutic drugs in clinical trials.     

Novel targeted therapies for the treatment of penile cancer

Introduction: The treatment of penile cancer has changed over the past decade in that it was primarily a surgically managed disease and those with locally advanced or metastatic disease uniformly had a very poor prognosis. However, with the use of better traditional systemic chemotherapeutic agents in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, the disease-specific survival and general outlook has improved. However, there is still a large group of patients who will progress even while on systemic therapy. It is in those patients where the application of targeted therapies has been investigated with some experiencing partial or even complete responses. With the improvement seen in patients with chemotherapy refractory disease, the application of novel targeted agents in the neoadjuvant setting may have a resultant positive impact on patient survival.

Areas covered: This review includes research pertaining to targeted therapies, biomarkers and signaling pathways involved with penile cancer. The article was based on a literature search using the keywords ‘penile cancer’ and ‘targeted therapies’.

Expert opinion: Penile cancer at the advanced stages of the disease has a high mortality. The utilization of novel targeted therapies in these situations is warranted in combination with, or sequentially with, traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy to improve the patient survival rate. Personalized therapy is nearly here for penile cancer and should be made real within the next decade.     

Can binimetinib,encorafenib and masitinib be more efficacious than currently available mutation-based targeted therapies for melanoma treatment?

Introduction: Historically, there were few effective and durable treatments for metastatic melanoma. Recently, mutation based targeted therapies have revolutionized treatment and outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma. Specifically, inhibitors aimed at BRAF, NRAS, and C-KIT mutations are now commonly used in treatment for patients harboring the specific mutations.

Areas covered: A brief review of current BRAF, NRAS, and C-KIT inhibitors provides background for a thorough review of newly developed agents namely binimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, encorafenib a BRAF inhibitor, and masitinib which inhibits C-KIT.

Expert opinion: While the 3 novel agents reviewed here have potential for use in melanoma, optimal utilization will occur once a more personalized approach incorporating genomic, proteomic, and immunologic data guides therapeutic decisions.     

Emerging paradigms in targeted treatments for Asian patients with NSCLC

Introduction: EGFR-targeted drugs have been successfully approved in many countries and have demonstrated higher efficacy and lower toxicity than chemotherapy in molecularly defined subgroups of patients. Significant advances in clinical trials and studies focusing on targeted therapies have rapidly developed in Asia.

Areas covered: In the present review article, all of the published data or meeting abstracts on completed or ongoing trials of targeted treatment for Asian patients with NSCLC were collected and analyzed.

Expert opinion: Routine molecular testing has been used clinically to identify mutations/fusions and guide patient selection for targeted therapies. Based on the evidence presented, we provided up-to-date treatment recommendations for Asian patients with advanced NSCLC. Future directions, including dividing Del19 and L858R patients into two distinct populations, will optimize therapeutic strategies for L858R patients and may inform rational trial design by considering the proportion of type of sensitive EGFR mutation as a stratification factor. Another important aspect to consider involves how to monitor resistance to TKIs, which will improve the outcome for lung cancer patients with driver gene mutations.     

An overview of binimetinib for the treatment of melanoma

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma have mutations in BRAF. Based on the results of prior phase III trials, the combination of a BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) and a MEK inhibitor (MEKi) is the standard of care in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma.     

BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma

Introduction: Selective inhibition of the MAPK pathway with either BRAF or MEK inhibition has emerged as a key component for the treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. New evidence suggests that the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors improves tumor response rate and progression-free survival, while potentially attenuating some of the serious adverse events observed with monotherapy.

Areas covered: This review covers the current data on the efficacy and safety of the selective BRAF (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) and MEK (trametinib) inhibitors as well as the available data on BRAF inhibitor + MEK inhibitor combination therapy (dabrafenib + trametinib and vemurafenib + cobimetinib). The efficacy, safety and toxicity data are discussed from Phase I, Phase II and Phase III trials of these drugs.

Expert opinion: Combination therapy with the BRAF and MEK inhibitors improves response rates and progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Some of the serious adverse events, in particular, the incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, are attenuated with combination therapy, whereas milder side effects such as pyrexia can be more common with combination therapy. Although dose reductions and dose interruptions are slightly more common with combination therapy, overall data supports the notion that combination therapy is safe and improves the outcomes for patients compared to single agent BRAF inhibitors.     

New therapies in the treatment of melanoma

Introduction: Therapies targeting immune checkpoints (CTLA-4) and the MAP kinase signaling pathway (RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK) have transformed the treatment of advanced melanoma in the past year. Agents aimed at other therapeutic targets of interest are being actively evaluated in the clinic.

Areas covered: Areas of active therapeutic interest in melanoma include immunotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy and chemotherapy; combinations of these modalities are now under systematic exploration.

Expert opinion: The evaluation of patients with melanoma now includes the molecular profiling of tumor mutations in the BRAF, as well as c-Kit, NRAS and other genes that have been discovered to be drivers of different subsets of the disease. The analysis of the host immunological response to melanoma is equally important, as a basis for the development of immunotherapies that have been of value to melanoma patients in the adjuvant arena, as well as for therapy of metastatic disease. The understanding of these two facets of the disease will provide a more rational basis for the delivery of individualized therapy for the disease both in its advanced setting, and in the adjuvant arena, in the future.     

The safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of melanoma

Introduction: The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors into clinical practice improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma patients. The combination of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with MEK inhibitor trametinib has shown its superiority to single agent therapy and is characterized by a tolerable spectrum of adverse events which shows a decrease in incidence over time on treatment.

Areas covered: The current scientific literature on safety and adverse events (AEs) related to BRAF and MEK-inhibition has been investigated with special focus on the large phase 3 studies (COMBI-v, COMBI-d and CoBRIM) as well as recent updates presented at oncology and melanoma meetings. Additionally, published case series/case reports were screened for information on AEs.

Expert opinion: Even though almost every patient (98%) under combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib experiences at least one adverse event, these are generally mild to moderate, reversible and can be managed with dose reductions or interruptions. However, due to an increased life expectancy, there is a substantial need to prevent and treat also mild adverse events, as they play a central role for the quality of life of patients. Ongoing clinical trials will have to demonstrate the efficacy as well as safety of triple combination with anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies.     

Investigational targeted therapies for the treatment of testicular germ cell tumors

Introduction: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common malignancy among men aged between 15 to 45. Despite high cure rates of >90% over all GCTs, 3 to 5% of patients will still die of platinum-refractory disease. New systemic treatment options are needed to improve treatment success in this challenging setting.

Areas covered: To review targeted treatment options and preclinical developments in platinum-refractory GCTs, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Medline and scientific meeting abstracts on published clinical trials and reports on molecularly targeted approaches was conducted. Outcomes of platinum-refractory disease and of patients failing high-dose chemotherapy remain poor. Currently, no molecularly targeted treatment has shown clinically meaningful activity in unselected patient populations in clinical trials, but individual patients may achieve short-lived objective responses by treatment with sunitinib, brentuximab vedotin or imatinib. Targeted trials based on molecular selection of patients have not yet been performed.

Expert opinion: The limited activity of targeted agents in refractory GCT is disappointing. Assessment of druggable biomarkers and marker-stratified treatment may help individual patients, but is largely lacking. The low incidence and high curability of GCTs make the design of larger clinical trials difficult. The potential of novel agents, i.e. immune-checkpoint inhibitors, remains to be elucidated.     

The future of targeted therapy approaches in melanoma

Background: The past 30 years have seen little improvement in the survival of patients with stage IV melanoma. Following the discovery of activating BRAF mutations in most melanomas, a wealth of preclinical experimentation has validated the BRAF/MAPK pathway as an excellent therapeutic target in melanoma. Despite these encouraging results, early clinical trials on BRAF/MAPK inhibition have been disappointing. Objective: In the current review, we discuss how differences between the preclinical and clinical settings may influence the response of melanoma cells to BRAF/MEK inhibition. As the BRAF/MEK signaling pathway is not solely responsible for the growth and survival of melanoma cells, we further discuss the therapeutic utility of inhibiting the PI3K/AKT and mTOR pathways both alone and in combination with BRAF/MEK. Conclusion: In looking ahead to the future, it is likely that new advances in melanoma biology, such as the identification of melanoma stem cells and a greater understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity, may play a role in the design of any future melanoma targeted therapy.