Tafamidis for transthyretin amyloidosis

Tafamidis meglumine (Vyndaqel?, Pfizer) is a novel, first-in-class drug for the treatment of transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP), a rare neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive sensory, motor and autonomic impairment that is ultimately fatal. Pathogenic mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) protein lead to destabilization of its tetrameric structure and subsequent formation of amyloid aggregates. Tafamidis is a small-molecule inhibitor that binds selectively to TTR in human plasma and kinetically stabilizes the tetrameric structure of both wild-type TTR and a number of different mutants. Clinical trials indicate that tafamidis slows disease progression in patients with TTR-FAP and reduces the burden of disease, demonstrating improvement in small and large nerve fiber function, modified body mass index and lower extremity neurological examination. Tafamidis has been granted marketing authorization by the European Commission for the treatment of TTR-FAP and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is currently reviewing this drug for the same indication.     

Inotersen for the treatment of adults with polyneuropathy caused by hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (ATTRv; v for variant) is an underdiagnosed, progressive, and fatal multisystemic disease with a heterogenous clinical phenotype that is caused by TTR gene mutations that destabilize the TTR protein, resulting in its misfolding, aggregation, and deposition in tissues throughout the body.

Areas covered: Inotersen, an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor, was recently approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of the polyneuropathy of ATTRv based on the positive results obtained in the pivotal phase 3 trial, NEURO-TTR. This review will discuss the mechanism of action of inotersen and its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability. A PubMed search using the terms ‘inotersen,’ ‘AG10,’ ‘antisense oligonucleotide,’ ‘hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis,’ ‘familial amyloid polyneuropathy,’ and ‘familial amyloid cardiomyopathy’ was performed, and the results were screened for the most relevant English language publications. The bibliographies of all retrieved articles were manually searched to identify additional studies of relevance.

Expert opinion: Inotersen targets the disease-forming protein, TTR, and has been shown to improve quality of life and neuropathy progression in patients with stage 1 or 2 ATTRv with polyneuropathy. Inotersen is well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile through regular monitoring for the development of glomerulonephritis or thrombocytopenia.     

An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of patisiran and tafamidis for the treatment of hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy

Background: Hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (hATTR amyloidosis) is a progressive, life-threatening disease. Until recently, tafamidis was the only approved pharmacotherapy. Patisiran significantly improved polyneuropathy and quality of life (QoL) in the phase III APOLLO trial. In the absence of direct comparisons, this analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of tafamidis and patisiran in hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

Research design and methods: Randomized controlled trial evidence for tafamidis was identified by systematic literature review. Indirect treatment comparisons were performed using the standard pairwise Bucher method for endpoints used in both APOLLO and the tafamidis Fx-005 trial: change from baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score-lower limbs (NIS-LL), Norfolk QoL-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire (QoL-DN), NIS-LL response, and mBMI vs. placebo. Inter-trial population differences were assessed by sensitivity analysis.

Results: The base-case analysis (FAP Stage 1 APOLLO patients vs. intent-to-treat Fx-005 population) suggested patisiran had a greater treatment effect vs. tafamidis for all endpoints, with significant improvements in mean change in NIS-LL (–5.49) and QoL-DN (–13.10) from baseline to Month 18. Similar trends were observed in all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: In the absence of direct comparisons, this analysis suggests patisiran has a greater treatment effect than tafamidis in patients with hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.     

Small transthyretin (TTR) ligands as possible therapeutic agents in TTR amyloidoses

In transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis TTR variants deposit as amyloid fibrils giving origin, in most cases, to peripheral polyneuropathy, cardiomyopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome and/or amyloid deposition in the eye. More than eighty TTR variants are known, most of them being pathogenic. The mechanism of TTR fibril formation is still not completely elucidated. However it is widely accepted that the amino acid substitutions in the TTR variants contribute to a destabilizing effect on the TTR tetramer molecule, which in particular conditions dissociate into non native monomeric intermediates that aggregate and polymerize in amyloid fibrils that further elongate. Since this is a multi-step process there is the possibility to impair TTR amyloid fibril formation at different stages of the process namely by tetramer stabilization, inhibition of fibril formation or fibril disruption. Till now the only efficient therapy available is liver transplant when performed in an early phase of the onset of the disease symptoms. Since this is a very invasive therapy alternatives are desirable. In that sense, several compounds have been proposed to impair amyloid formation or disruption. Based on the proposed mechanism for TTR amyloid fibril formation we discuss the action of some of the proposed TTR stabilizers such as derivatives of some NSAIDs (diflunisal, diclofenac, flufenamic acid, and derivatives) and the action of amyloid disrupters such as 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin (I-DOX) and tetracyclines. Among all these compounds, TTR stabilizers seem to be the most interesting since they would impair very early the process of amyloid formation and could also have a prophylactic effect.     

Olaparib for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

Introduction: Despite recent advances in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer, overall survival rates remain poor, and there is a pressing need to develop novel therapeutic agents and maintenance strategies to improve outcomes for women with this disease. Olaparib, a potent oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in women with ovarian cancer, associated with homologous recombination deficiency.

Areas covered: This review outlines the rationale for PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer and summarizes the efficacy and tolerability data for olaparib to date. Ongoing phase III clinical trials of olaparib in ovarian cancer will be discussed.

Expert opinion: There are a number of issues regarding the optimal use of olaparib in ovarian cancer, including the identification of a homologous recombination deficiency signature to predict treatment response, establishment of the optimal treatment setting (maintenance or relapsed disease), and evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Finally, the long term consequences of PARP inhibitors, including the risk of myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia need to be quantified in ongoing large phase III clinical trials.     

治疗转甲状腺素蛋白介导的淀粉样变性心肌病新药：氯苯唑酸

转甲状腺素蛋白(TTR)介导的淀粉样变性心肌病主要是由野生或突变型TTR淀粉样纤维错误折叠在心肌沉积所致。氯苯唑酸对TTR的甲状腺素结合部位具有较高的亲和力,可选择性与其结合并抑制TTR降解。临床试验表明,氯苯唑酸可使90%以上患者的TTR稳定,而且与安慰剂比较,氯苯唑酸可明显降低患者的全因死亡率及心血管疾病相关住院率,患者心脏功能和生活质量也显著改善。氯苯唑酸无严重不良事件,患者耐受性好。     

The launch of opicapone for Parkinson’s disease: negatives versus positives

Introduction: Opicapone is a novel, third generation COMT inhibitor approved for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Safety and tolerability data is critical to determine the benefit-harm balance and anticipate therapeutic adherence.

Areas covered: This review evaluates the tolerability and safety profile of opicapone. These data were extracted from all published clinical trials, including preclinical, phase I, phase II and phase III studies as well as postmarketing data. Opicapone was safe and well tolerated, with frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events similar to placebo.

Expert opinion: Opicapone have shown a good safety and tolerability profile. This adds to its proven efficacy and convenient once-daily administration, supporting a role of opicapone as a first-line therapy for motor complications in Parkinson’s disease patients.     

The safety of pomalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pomalidomide, a derivative of thalidomide and member of the immunomodulatory drugs is licenced for use in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Europe, USA, Canada and Japan.

Areas covered: This review details all published trials in which pomalidomide has been used in the treatment of myeloma including phase I, II and III studies via PubMed searches for randomised control trials, observational cohort, case reports, meta-analysis and reviews. In addition abstract searches from the 2015 IMW and ASH conferences have been included. Drug safety has been a main focus with additional detail outlining the current clinical experience and treatment efficacy. Drug related toxicities and management of such events are covered in detail.

Expert opinion: Pomalidomide is well tolerated and has been demonstrated to prolong progression free survival and overall survival in RRMM patients in comparison to other agents commonly used later in the disease. Treatment related toxicities are usually easily managed using treatment interruption, dose modification, prophylactic therapies and blood/platelet transfusions. There is scope for the drug to be used in combination with newer agents at disease presentation, relapse and as a long-term maintenance option. At present trials assessing its use in early disease and maintenance are lacking.     

Vandetanib for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction: The use of targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing, especially as conventional chemotherapy affords relatively small benefits at a cost of increased toxicity. Two of the more established therapeutic targets in NSCLC are the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Vandetanib is an orally available inhibitor of VEGFR and EGFR signalling and is an attractive therapeutic agent owing to the simultaneous inhibition of both pathways.

Areas covered: This review encompasses the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of vandetanib in advanced NSCLC. Of particular interest are the randomized Phase III clinical trials, which did not show clinically significant overall survival benefit for vandetanib monotherapy or in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens.

Expert opinion: Vandetanib has anti-tumour activity in NSCLC, with improved objective responses and disease control. However, significant survival benefits were not demonstrated in Phase III clinical trials and at present vandetanib is not in further development for use in NSCLC.     

MAP0004: dihydroergotamine mesylate inhalation aerosol for acute treatment of migraine

Introduction: Dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) has been used as an acute migraine treatment since 1945, although tolerability with intravenous administration has limited its use. MAP0004 is a novel, orally inhaled, aerosol formulation of DHE that provides pulmonary drug delivery using a pressurized, metered dose inhaler for rapid absorption through lung alveoli. MAP0004 was developed to provide the anti-migraine efficacy of DHE, with fewer systemic effects than intravenous dosing.

Areas covered: This review discusses available literature describing the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy of MAP0004, including data from Phase II and Phase III clinical trials.

Expert opinion: MAP0004 aerosol DHE provides desirable activation of 5-HT1B/D receptors, resulting in effective anti-migraine effects. Unlike intravenous DHE, MAP0004 is less likely to bind with other serotonergic, adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors, resulting in fewer unwanted side effects. In addition, MAP0004 is less arterioconstrictive than intravenous DHE. Both Phase II and III clinical trials support anti-migraine efficacy with superior tolerability with MAP0004 compared with intravenous DHE. Inhaled rather than intravenous administration should also improve patient acceptance. These data support the future use of MAP0004 as a first-line acute migraine treatment.     

Abiraterone acetate for castration resistant prostate cancer

Importance of the field: Androgen deprivation therapy has been the standard of care in advanced prostate cancer for >?50 years. Although castration is initially effective, most patients eventually develop progressive disease despite low levels of testosterone (termed castration resistant prostate cancer, CRPC). Intratumor and extra-gonadal androgens (specifically adrenal androgens) represent a means for continued androgen receptor-mediated growth in CRPC and have thus become therapeutic targets. One novel therapeutic is abiraterone acetate (AA): an inhibitor of CYP17, an enzyme that catalyzes two key serial reactions in androgen and estrogen biosynthesis. Data from Phase I and II trials suggest that clinically important antitumor activity is seen in up to 70% of castrate patients with advanced prostate cancer resistant to currently available endocrine therapies. The toxicity profile has also been found to be acceptable. Two large Phase III clinical trials are currently open to accrual and will hopefully validate the impressive Phase II data.

Areas covered in the review: The chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability of AA.

What the reader will gain: Readers will understand the function of non-gonadal androgens, the importance of continued androgen deprivation in advanced prostate cancer and the role/clinical efficacy of AA.

Take home message: The recent realization that non-gonadal sources of androgens (adrenal and intracrine de novo synthesis) may be a major mediator of disease progression forms the biological rationale behind the development of abiraterone acetate and related drugs. Abiraterone acetate is an orally administered, specific inhibitor of CYP17A1, a rate-limiting enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. Preliminary data from Phase I and II trials suggest that prostate specific antigen declines occur in a large proportion of patients and that the toxicity profile is acceptable. Two large Phase III clinical trials are currently open to accrual and, if proven to be efficacious, will result in widespread use of a drug specifically developed to suppress adrenal androgens.     

An update on the utility and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of major neurocognitive disorders with a prevalence in the US of about 5.7 million in 2018. With the disease burden projected to increase dramatically in the coming years, it is imperative to review the current available treatment regimens for their safety and utility. The cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have continued to play a pivotal role in managing the symptoms and possibly slowing the rate of progression of AD since 1993. Owing to their being a mainstay in the treatment of AD, the safety and efficacy of prescribing these drugs needs to be reviewed often, especially with the approval of new formulations and doses.

Areas covered: The three ChEIs currently approved by the FDA are donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine. This article will review the safety and tolerability of these ChEIs and analyze the potential disease modifying properties of these drugs. The authors have reviewed all recent literature including review articles, meta-analyzes, clinical trials and more.

Expert opinion: These ChEIs differ subtly in their mechanisms of action, in their tolerability and safety and FDA-approved indications. All are considered first-line, symptomatic treatments of the various phases of AD and may even have potentially disease-modifying effects.     

Old and new acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: To date, pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors (AChEIs) for mild-to-moderate AD, and memantine for moderate-to-severe AD. AChEIs reversibly inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE), thus increasing the availability of acetylcholine in cholinergic synapses, enhancing cholinergic transmission. These drugs provide symptomatic short-term benefits, without clearly counteracting the progression of the disease.

Areas covered: On the wake of successful clinical trials which lead to the marketing of AChEIs donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine, many compounds with AChEI properties have been developed and tested mainly in Phase I-II clinical trials in the last twenty years. Here, we review clinical trials initiated and interrupted, and those ongoing so far.

Expert opinion: Despite many clinical trials with novel AChEIs have been carried out after the registration of those currently used to treat mild to moderate AD, none so far has been successful in a Phase III trial and marketed. Alzheimer’s disease is a complex multifactorial disorder, therefore therapy should likely address not only the cholinergic system but also additional neurotransmitters. Moreover, such treatments should be started in very mild phases of the disease, and preventive strategies addressed in elderly people.     

The effect of tafamidis on the QTc interval in healthy subjects

Aims

The transthyretin (TTR) stabilizer, tafamidis, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of TTR familial amyloid polyneuropathy (20 mg day⁻¹). Tafamidis use in TTR cardiomyopathy led to the study of the potential effect of tafamidis on the QT_c interval in healthy subjects.

Methods

This randomized, three treatment, three period, six sequence crossover study with placebo, a positive control (moxifloxacin 400 mg) and tafamidis (400 mg, to achieve a supra-therapeutic C_max of ∽20 µg ml⁻¹) was conducted in healthy volunteers at three clinical research units. Oral dosing in each of the three treatment periods was separated by a washout period of  ≥ 14 days. Serial triplicate 12-lead electrocardiograms were performed. QT_c intervals were derived using the Fridericia correction method. Safety and tolerability were assessed by physical examination, vital signs measurement, laboratory analyses and monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 42 subjects completed the study. The upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference in baseline-adjusted QT_cF between tafamidis 400 mg and placebo was <10 ms (non-inferiority criterion) for all time points. The lower limit of the two-sided 90% CI between moxifloxacin 400 mg and placebo exceeded 5 ms at the pre-specified moxifloxacin t_max of 3 h post-dose, confirming assay sensitivity. C_max and AUC(0,24 h) for tafamidis were 20.36 µg ml⁻¹ and 305.4 µg ml⁻¹ h, respectively. There were no serious/severe AEs or treatment discontinuations due to AEs.

Conclusions

This thorough QT_c study suggests that a supra-therapeutic single 400 mg oral dose of tafamidis does not prolong the QT_c interval and is well-tolerated in healthy volunteers.     

New and emerging treatments for Alzheimer's disease

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease and other dementias represent a significant and increasing clinical challenge. Dementia is also associated with a substantial economic cost and burden to health service provision. Existing treatments slow the progression of symptoms of the disease, but their efficacy does not extend to all patients and is not sustained beyond an average of 6 months. It is, therefore, critical to address the current lack of effective treatments to target the underlying pathology and disease process in Alzheimer's disease.

Areas covered: This review aims to highlight the main areas of new therapeutic development and discuss some of the main therapies currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Despite a number of promising rationales for therapeutic treatments in Alzheimer's disease, very few of these avenues have been developed beyond preclinical studies. The predominant focus of the current article is on treatments currently in Phase II and Phase III clinical trials, but some other promising areas of development are also discussed. There are currently only three therapeutics being investigated in Phase III clinical trials. This emphasizes the substantial caution and underinvestment in treatment development in this area.

Expert opinion: There is a distinct lack of novel approaches in the pipeline, and whether there is a new disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer's disease in the next 5 years almost entirely depends on the success of currently ongoing immunotherapy studies. Importantly, there is potential benefit in exploring existing licensed treatments alongside novel drug development to increase the focus on novel targets within this time frame.     

Effect of micronized fenofibrate on microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Objective: Micronized fenofibrate prevents the progression of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes, but no systematic review has summarized these effects. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to investigate the effects of micronized fenofibrate on type 2 diabetes-related microvascular complications.

Research design and methods: The PubMed database was systematically searched for trials in English language published between January 1990 and November 2015 that examined the effects of fenofibrate on microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Results: Thirteen trials of the 290 clinical studies reviewed met the inclusion criteria. Fenofibrate significantly slowed the progression of early diabetic retinopathy by 30 to 40% within 4 to 5 years in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-existing retinopathy at baseline. Fenofibrate also consistently reduced the progression of urinary albumin excretion in the trials studied. One large study demonstrated a significant effect (47% reduction) of the drug on diabetes-related minor amputations.

Conclusions: The available evidence supports the adjunctive early use of fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes mellitus for the prevention of microvascular complications, particularly in individuals presenting with the first signs of the complication and during the initial stages of the disease.     

Emerging biological agents for hepatitis C

Introduction: New direct-acting antiviral agents have changed the landscape of treatment of chronic HCV infection. Despite current treatments are well tolerated with a high rate of sustained virological response (SVR), some medical needs remain. Nowadays there are a large number of approved medications for the treatment of HCV infection; nevertheless, new studies are conducted to find new agents and new combinations.

Areas covered: A literature research of new antiviral compounds indicated for the treatment of HCV infection was achieved by an online search of medication undergoing development on Pubmed and clinicalTrials.gov clinical trials registry. We considered phase I/II studies and some randomized Phase III trials.

Expert opinion: More knowledge about impact of HCV eradication on disease progression and more confidence regarding drug-drug interaction are needed. Furthermore, each treatment should be individualized targeting the patients needs with the aim not only to obtain viral suppression but also to stop progression of liver disease and HCV related conditions, and to improve patient health status.     

Experimental and investigational drugs for the treatment of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is most often associated with chronic lung disease, early onset emphysema, and liver disease. The standard of care in lung disease due to AATD is alpha-1 antitrypsin augmentation but there are several new and emerging treatment options under investigation for both lung and liver manifestations.

Areas covered: We review therapeutic approaches to lung and liver disease in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) and the agents in clinical development according to their mode of action. The focus is on products in clinical trials, but data from pre-clinical studies are described where relevant, particularly where progression to trials appears likely.

Expert opinion: Clinical trials directed at lung and liver disease separately are now taking place. Multimodality treatment may be the future, but this could be limited by treatment costs. The next 5–10 years may reveal new guidance on when to use therapeutics for slowing disease progression with personalized treatment regimes coming to the forefront.