Rofecoxib in the prevention of perimenstrual migraine: an open-label pilot trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of rofecoxib in the prevention of perimenstrual migraine. BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have demonstrated benefit in reducing the frequency and intensity of menstrual migraine when administered perimenstrually. Anti-inflammatory drugs, however, may not be well tolerated and can produce gastrointestinal irritation. Rofecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, has anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, and a significantly improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted in which patients with a history of menstrually associated migraine and experiencing at least one migraine monthly during the perimenstrual period were enrolled. Patients who completed a baseline diary for the first month were randomized to receive either rofecoxib 25 mg or 50 mg daily for 10 days, starting 5 days before menstrual flow. Headaches experienced during this 10-day period were recorded in the patient's diary. Patients continued rofecoxib for 2 consecutive menstrual cycles. Mean migraine frequency, intensity, and duration as well as patient's level of functioning during the 2 cycles were compared with baseline. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed baseline and rofecoxib dosing for 2 menstrual cycles. Mean migraine frequency decreased from 5.6 to 2.6 migraines per menstrual cycle (P=.005). Eight (57%) of 14 patients had a > or = 50% reduction in headache frequency. No significant improvement in headache intensity, duration, and functional impairment were observed. Both doses of rofecoxib were well tolerated with no statistical difference in patient response between the doses. CONCLUSION: Rofecoxib at a perimenstrual daily dose of 25 or 50 mg demonstrated a significant reduction in frequency of perimenstrual migraine. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rofecoxib in the prevention of perimenstrual migraine is warranted.     

Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: a randomized trial and open-label follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine when administered by subjects in a nonclinic setting. DESIGN: A 1-month, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, followed by a 6-month open-label follow-up. SETTING: Ambulatory subjects treating themselves outside of a medical setting. SUBJECTS: One hundred thirty-one adult subjects with migraine, diagnosed according to International Headache Society criteria, were enrolled in the study: 113 treated at least one headache in the controlled trial, and 74 treated at least one headache in the open-label phase. All subjects were members of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Medical Care Program and were recruited at two urban medical centers. INTERVENTION: Intranasal lidocaine 4% or saline placebo 0.5 mL was dropped into the nostril on the side of the headache, or bilaterally for bilateral headache, according to study protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trial: percent of headaches relieved to mild or none at 15 minutes and relapse of headache within 24 hours. Open-label: percent of headaches relieved to mild or none at 15 and 30 minutes and relapse within 24 hours. RESULTS: In the controlled trial, headache was relieved within 15 minutes in 34 (35.8%) of 95 subjects treated with 4% intranasal lidocaine compared with 8 (7.4%) of 108 subjects receiving placebo (P < .001). Headaches relapsed in 7 (20.6%) of 34 subjects treated with 4% intranasal lidocaine compared to 0 of 8 placebo subjects (P = .312). In the open-label follow-up, headaches were relieved in 129 (41.2%) of 313 episodes within 15 minutes and in 141 (57.6%) of 245 episodes after 30 minutes. Headaches relapsed in 28 (19.9%) of 140. The response did not diminish over time: 32 (62.8%) of 51 first headaches were relieved at 30 minutes and 10 (71.4%) of 14 seventh headaches were relieved. Relapse occurred in 28 (20%) [corrected] of 129 headaches at a mean time (+/- SD) of 7.4 (+/- 6.6) hours. CONCLUSION: Intranasal lidocaine 4% provides rapid relief of migraine symptoms. For those subjects who do respond, the effect does not diminish over 6-month follow-up.     

Difference in triptan effect in patients with migraine and early allodynia

The aim of this study was to determine whether in migraine patients with and without aura early treatment with various triptans leads to differences in pain reduction after 1 h and in modulating cutaneous allodynia. Thirty-six patients with early manifestation of a clinically recognizable allodynia of the face and non-responders to earlier treatment with sumatriptan 100 mg were included. Patients were randomized to six triptan treatment groups. Significant pain reduction was seen only in the group receiving zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg with a mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 3.8 (s.d. 1.2) at baseline and 2.4 (s.d. 1.3; P = 0.015) at 1 h after using the triptan and was thus a predictor of a VAS score 3 within 1 h. The study results indicate that migraine headache intensity can be reduced within 1 h by using zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray in spite of the presence of early cutaneous allodynia.     

Dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the treatment of acute migraine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dihydroergotamine (DHE) nasal spray in patients suffering from common or classical migraine. METHODS: In a double-blind parallel-group study, 52 outpatients with migraine were randomly allocated to DHE nasal spray or to placebo. Two puffs, one in each nostril, was taken as an initial dose (resulting in either 0.5 or 1 mg of DHE), followed by another puff (0.5 mg) after 30 and 60 minutes, if necessary, achieving a maximum dose of 2 mg for patients of the DHE 1-mg group or of 1.5 mg for patients of the 0.5-mg group. Four consecutive attacks were thus treated. The efficacy analysis was done for observed cases. The main outcome measure was reduction of the severity of the attacks. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the migraine characteristics or the number of treatments of the patients from the different groups. Dihydroergotamine 1 mg tended to provide better relief than 0.5 mg, although the effect was not statistically significant. Patients taking DHE used less rescue medications, with a dose-dependent effect. Side effects were reported by four patients receiving DHE but not placebo. The tolerability of the drug was assessed as good by 94% of the patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that DHE nasal spray is well tolerated and has dose-dependent efficacy in migraine.     

Sumatriptan 6 mg subcutaneous as an effective migraine treatment in patients with cutaneous allodynia who historically fail to respond to oral triptans

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of 6 mg subcutaneous (SC) sumatriptan to treat migraine and the relationship between response of migraine and cutaneous allodynia in a population of migraine patients who historically failed to respond to oral triptan medications. This was an openlabel study consisting of patients with migraines who historically failed to respond to oral triptan medications. Forty-three patients were asked to treat three migraine attacks with 6 mg SC sumatriptan. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving relief of headache at 2 h. Ninetyone percent of the patients responded to a single dose of SC sumatriptan 6 mg. Fifty percent of all patients were pain-free by 2 h and over 30% had a 24-h sustained pain-free response. When administered within 90 min from the onset of migraine (i.e., during the developing phase of cutaneous allodynia), SC 6 mg sumatriptan proved to be effective despite the occurrence of allodynia in a group of patients, who historically had failed to respond to oral triptan medications. These findings suggest that the window of opportunity to treat allodynic patients with injectable triptans may be longer (up to 2 h) than with oral triptans (up to 1 h).     

Cutaneous allodynia and migraine: Another view

The paradigm of early treatment of the migraine attack at mild pain intensity has become one alternative to circumventing the problem of compromised oral absorption of symptomatic drugs due to migraine-induced gastrointestinal dysmotility. Early treatment also has been proposed to be advantageous because most migraineurs could be less responsive to delayed treatment, owing to the development of central sensitization of the trigeminal pain transmission. Ranking the underlying principles, it seems that the improved response to an oral triptan formulation at mild migraine symptom intensity has more to do with less impaired gastrointestinal absorption in the early stage of the attack than decreasing the time and preventing chances for central sensitization and development of cutaneous allodynia. Furthermore, parenteral administration of a triptan is always more likely to provide relief of symptoms than conventional tablets, even when it is used later in the course of the migraine attack. Individually tailored use of the available triptan formulations will increase, without any doubt, the within-migraineur consistency of response. It also will reduce the overall proportion of migraine attacks or migraineurs not responding to triptan treatment. Notwithstanding, the recommendation of early treatment during the migraine attack when the pain is mild remains valid.     

Immunoadsorption patients with multiple sclerosis: an open-label pilot study

BACKGROUND: Immunoadsorption (IA) is occasionally applied in patients with acute relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS). This pilot study was undertaken to determine whether IA might help in secondary progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: IA was performed at 1-week intervals in 12 patients with secondary progressive or relapsing-remitting MS. These patients had an extended disability status scale (EDSS) score of 4.5-7 and an EDSS increase of 0.5 within 6 months before inclusion in the study despite conventional drug therapy. The change in the EDSS and that in the MS functional composite (MSFC) score, which consisted of quantitative tests of arm function, ambulation, visual acuity and cognition, served as the primary outcome variables, which were measured at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Changes in quality of life and cerebral lesions by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were also assessed at baseline and after the last immunoadsorption (month 3). RESULTS: A significant reduction of the median EDSS change was observed after the treatment period, which reversed 3 months after the immunoadsorptions had been stopped. Ten of 12 patients remained stable during the first year of follow-up with no significant changes of the MSFC scores. No significant changes in magnetic resonance imaging T2-hyperintense brain lesions or in the number of gadolinium-positive lesions and in the patients' quality of life were observed. Western blot analyses demonstrated a reduction of serum myelin-specific antibodies, which were collected in the adsorber eluates. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of immunoglobulins, including myelin-specific antibodies by immunoadsorption, seems to delay disease progression as defined by EDSS, MSFC and MRI, while the patients' quality of life did not deteriorate.     

MAP0004, orally inhaled dihydroergotamine for acute treatment of migraine: efficacy of early and late treatments

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of MAP0004, an orally inhaled dihydroergotamine, for acute treatment of migraine when administered at various time points from within 1 hour to more than 8 hours after migraine onset.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis post hoc subanalysis was conducted using data from 902 patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, phase 3, multicenter study conducted from July 14, 2008, through March 23, 2009. End points were 2-hour pain relief and pain-free rates in patients who treated a migraine in ≤1 hour, from >1 hour to ≤4 hours, from >4 to ≤8 hours, or in >8 hours after onset of migraine, given that patients may be unwilling or unable to initiate treatment at headache inception.RESULTSTreatment with MAP0004 was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving pain at all treatment points (≤1 hour after start of migraine: 66% [74/112] for MAP0004 vs 41% [48/118] for placebo, P<.001; >1 to ≤4 hours: 60% [91/153] vs 35% [58/168], P<.001; >4 to ≤8 hours: 53% [36/68] vs 30% [16/54], P=.008; and >8 hours: 48% [25/52] vs 24% [11/46], P=.007). Pain-free rates were also significantly higher with MAP0004 than placebo for treatment within 8 hours after migraine onset (≤1 hour: 38% [43/112] for MAP0004 vs 13% [15/118] for placebo, P<.001; >1 to ≤4 hours: 28% [43/153] vs 10% [17/168], P<.001; >4 to ≤8 hours: 22% [15/68] vs 7% [4/54], P<.025) but not at >8 hours (19% [10/52] vs 9% [4/46], P=.106).CONCLUSIONThis post hoc subanalysis shows that MAP0004 was effective in treating migraine irrespective of the time of treatment, even more than 8 hours after onset of migraine pain.     

Migrainous corpalgia: body pain and allodynia associated with migraine attacks

Cephalic and extracephalic allodynia are recognized as a common sign of sensory sensitization during migraine episodes. However, the occurrence of body pain in migraine has not been thoroughly explored. Here we report three patients presenting with spontaneous body pain in association with migraine attacks. A 41-year-old woman experienced face and limb pain along with migraine headaches; it started before, during or after headache, was usually ipsilateral to head pain, and could last from minutes to days. A 39-year-old woman had pain in her right limbs, back and neck for 30–60 min prior to right-sided migraine headaches. A 30-year-old woman perceived pain in her left upper limb for 24–48 h prior to left-sided migraine headaches. All patients had allodynia to mechanical stimuli over the painful areas. Spontaneous body pain may be associated with migraine attacks. Together with allodynia, this might be a consequence of central sensitization.     

Rizatriptan combined with rofecoxib vs. rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: an open label pilot study

Rizatriptan is an effective and fast acting drug for the acute treatment of migraine. As with any other acute treatment for migraine, headache recurrence may occur in up to one-third of responders. Combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) seems to reduce the incidence of headache recurrence in clinical practice. Rofecoxib is a member of a new class of NSAIDs, which selectively inhibits the COX-2 enzyme and therefore is associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal side-effects; the drug has a long plasma half-life (17 h). This open label study compared rizatriptan with rizatriptan plus rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine. Fifty-six triptan naive patients from a tertiary centre (37 women and 19 men, ages 16-55 years, mean 35 years) with International Headache Society migraine were randomized into two groups. They were instructed to treat three consecutive moderate or severe attacks with either 10 mg rizatriptan (group 1: 18 women and 10 men) or with 10 mg rizatriptan plus 25 mg rofecoxib (group 2: 19 women and 9 men). The presence of headache and nausea at 1, 2 and 4 h, and of side-effects, use of rescue medication and recurrence were compared. Fifty-four patients completed the study. Group 1 treated 76 attacks and group 2 treated 81 attacks. Absence of headache at 1 h was seen in 19 attacks (25%) in group 1 and in 34 attacks (42%) in group 2 (P=0.082); at 2 h absence of headache was seen in 60% of group 1 attacks and in 76% of group 2 attacks (P=0.115). At 4 h, 75% of group 1 attacks and 88% of group 2 attacks were pain free (P=0.122). With regard to nausea, of those who had nausea at baseline, 31% and 49% of attacks in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were nausea free at 1 h (P=0.091), 75% and 79% at 2 h (P=0.736) and 82% and 91% (P=0.479) at 4 h. Recurrence, based on all attacks of those patients who achieved pain free at 4 h, was observed in 53% of group 1 and 20% of group 2 attacks (P<0.001). Sustained pain-free rates (for the 4-h time point) were 45.6% of group 1 and 78.9% of group 2 attacks. There were no significant differences with regard to rescue medication consumption after 4 h and side-effects in both groups. There was a non-significant trend for the combination group to have a higher response rate. The group treated with rizatriptan and rofecoxib had a lower recurrence rate than the group treated with rizatriptan. This study demonstrated that combining a fast acting triptan such as rizatriptan with rofecoxib reduced headache recurrence rates, was well tolerated and may be more effective than the use of rizatriptan alone. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are necessary to confirm these observations.     

Acute and interictal allodynia in patients with different headache forms: an Italian pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate allodynia in patients with different primary headaches. BACKGROUND: Many migraineurs have allodynia during headache attacks; some may have allodynia outside attacks; allodynia may also be associated with other primary headaches. METHODS: A total of 260 consecutive primary headache patients presenting for the first time at a headache center, and 23 nonheadache controls answered written questions (subsequently repeated verbally) to determine the presence of acute and interictal allodynia. RESULTS: We divided the patients into: episodic migraine (N = 177), subdivided into only migraine without aura (N = 114) and those sometimes or always reporting migraine with aura (N = 63); episodic tension-type headache (N = 28); chronic headaches (headache > or = 15 days/month, N = 52), including chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache, and medication-overuse headache; and other headache forms (N = 3). Acute allodynia was present in 132 (50.7%), significantly more often in patients sometimes or always suffering migraine with aura, and those with chronic headache forms, compared to patients with migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache. Interictal allodynia was present in 63 (24.2%) patients, with significantly higher frequency in those having migraine with aura attacks than controls and common migraine patients. CONCLUSIONS: Allodynia is not specific to migraine but is frequent in all headache patients: acute allodynia was reported in half those interviewed and in over a third of patients in each headache category; interictal allodynia was reported by nearly 25%.     

Levetiracetam in the preventive treatmentof transformed migraine: A prospective, open-label, pilot study

Background:

Most preventive agents used for transformed migraine (TM)have not been studied specifically for the treatment of this syndrome. Open-label trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of levetiracetam in the treatment of refractory headaches.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerabilityof levetiracetam in the preventive treatment of refractory TM.

Methods:

This prospective, open-label, pilot study was conducted at TheNew England Center for Headache, Stamford, Connecticut. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with refractory TM according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein et al. All participants had failed on at least 1 but not more than 3 preventive drugs. Other preventive drugs were allowed if they had been received at a stable dose for > 30 days. The dosage of the levetiracetam tablets ranged from 1000 to 3000 mg/d in 2 divided doses. The treatment phase lasted 3 months. The primary end point was headache frequency (expressed as the number of headache days per month), and the secondary end point was the frequency of moderate or severe headache (d/mo). Other end points were headache score, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire score, and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score. Statistical analyses were performed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication) using data subjected to the last-observation-carried-forward algorithm. We also conducted per-protocol (PP) analyses in patients who completed the study.

Results:

The ITT population consisted of 36 patients (26 women, 10 men;mean [SD] age, 46.5 [17.4] years). The mean headache frequency at baseline was 24.9 d/mo, and a significant reduction in headache frequency was obtained at l, 2, and 3 months of treatment (19.4, 18.4, and 16.2 d/mo, respectively; all, P < 0.001 Reproduction in whole or part is not permitted. vs baseline). At baseline, the mean number of moderate or severe headache days was 16.8 d/mo compared with 13.2, 11.9, and 9.7 d/mo at 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively (P=NS, <0.01, and <0.01, respectively). The mean MIDAS score was significantly reduced at 3 months compared with baseline (40.8 vs 62.8 d/mo; P = 0.01). The mean HIT-6 score was 59.4 at 3 months versus 63.4 at baseline (P < 0.01). In the PP population, the mean (SD) headache frequency was reduced from 26.1 (4.1) d/mo at baseline to 14.3 (4.8) d/mo at the end of the study (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) headache score was reduced from 51.3 (17.1) at baseline to 34.0 (22.0) at 3 months (P < 0.016).

Conclusion:

The results of this study in patients with TM support the role of levetiracetam in the preventive treatment of refractory TM.     

Lidocaine patch treatment in patients with low back pain: results of an open-label, nonrandomized pilot study

This prospective, 6-week, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized pilot study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of a lidocaine patch 5% in patients with low back pain (LBP). Patients with moderate to severe LBP, defined as acute/subacute (< 3 months, n = 21), short-term chronic (3-12 months, n = 33), or long-term chronic (> 12 months, n = 77), were recruited from 5 clinics; participants applied < or = 4 patches (560 cm total) once daily to area of maximal LBP as add-on treatment through week 2, with the option to taper concomitant analgesics during weeks 3-6. Scores on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were obtained at weeks 2 and 6. Safety analyses included reports of adverse events (AEs) and skin sensitivity to pinprick/light touch. Significant improvements in average daily pain intensity on the BPI were noted at weeks 2 and 6 (P < or = 0.001). Significant improvements in pain interference with quality of life (QOL) were noted for all BPI measures of QOL at weeks 2 and 6 for the acute/subacute (P < or = 0.007) and long-term chronic LBP groups (P < 0.0001) and for 5 of 7 BPI measures for the short-term chronic LBP group (P < or = 0.042). Fifty-eight percent of patients reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with treatment. The lidocaine patch was well tolerated. Most common AEs were dizziness and rash (n = 5, 3.8%), and most AEs (80%) were mild to moderate in intensity. Significant improvement in pain intensity and QOL in this cohort of LBP patients was noted during treatment with the lidocaine patch 5%. Controlled clinical trials are warranted.     

Comparative sensitivity of stopwatch methodology and conventional pain assessment measures for detecting early response to triptans in migraine: results of a randomized, open-label pilot study

BACKGROUND: The standard measure of efficacy used in migraine trials is a 4-point patient-rated headache pain intensity (HPI) scale. However, it has been suggested that using a stopwatch to measure the time to meaningful pain relief can provide a more precise measurement of treatment response. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the sensitivity of a stopwatch method for detecting meaningful relief of headache pain and the correlation of this method with the HPI scale and a 5-point pain relief scale. METHODS: In this open-label, parallel-group pilot study, patients were randomized to receive oral eletriptan 40 mg, eletriptan 80 mg, or rizatriptan 10 mg for the treatment of a single acute migraine attack. The effect of study treatment on migraine pain was assessed immediately before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 hours after dosing. At each time point, patients recorded the 3 types of pain assessment in a patient diary. HPI was rated using the standard 4-point International Headache Society pain intensity scale (from 0 = no pain to 3 = severe pain). Pain relief was rated on a 5-point pain relief scale (from 4 = no relief to 0 = complete relief). The time to the onset of meaningful pain relief was measured using a stopwatch. At 4 hours after dosing, patients provided a global rating of the overall efficacy of study medication on a 5-point scale (from 0 = poor to 4 = excellent). RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients participated in the trial (78.5% female; mean [SD] age, 37.7 [9.8] years; 58.2% white). The median times to meaningful pain relief measured by stopwatch were 84, 72, and 93 minutes for eletriptan 40 mg, eletriptan 80 mg, and rizatriptan 10 mg, respectively (log-rank P = 0.029, eletriptan 80 mg vs rizatriptan 10 mg). At 90 minutes (approximating the median time to meaningful pain relief on the stopwatch), headache response rates using HPI scoring (mild to no pain) were 65%, 68%, and 52% in the respective treatment groups, with no significant difference between groups. On the pain relief scale, the corresponding mean (SD) scores at 90 minutes were 1.6 (1.2), 1.4 (1.3), and 2.0 (1.4) (P = NS). The pain relief-defined response (> or = 75% pain relief) at 90 minutes did not differ significantly between the 3 treatment groups (62%, 56%, and 48%). Detection of early improvement (0.5 and 1 hour) was similar with the HPI and pain relief scales. CONCLUSION: The results of this open-label pilot study suggest the convergent validity of 3 pain-assessment methods in migraine, but indicate that the use of a stopwatch may be a more sensitive method for detecting between-group differences.     

Dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, methysergide and sumatriptan - basic science in relation to migraine treatment

The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor family mediates the effects of several drugs highly effective in migraine primarily by activating 5-HT(1B) , 5-HT(1D) , and 5-HT(1F) receptors. Ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, and methysergide, as well as the "triptan" sumatriptan, are all agonists for these receptors. The receptor profile and degree of selectivity of these four drugs differ, which is reflected by their side effects that limit their use in the acute and prophylactic treatment of migraine. The acute antimigraine efficacy of these remedies is very much dependent on the formulation used where, in general, parenteral formulations are more effective in reliving the symptoms of a migraine attack.     

Efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin combined with etodolac for the treatment of chronic post-thoracotomy pain: an open-label prospective clinical trial

Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPP) is associated with surgical intercostal nerve injury. Like other forms of neuropathic pain, there is no ideal treatment. Nitroglycerin (NTG) has been found efficacious in acute pain, but has not been tested for chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics. The present study investigated the efficacy of NTG combined with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug etodolac for the treatment of CPP. Thirty of 129 patients who underwent thoracotomy within an 18-month period had moderate to severe pain that did not respond to etodolac. NTG, 5 mg/day, was added to the treatment. A significant reduction in VAS was observed on day 14 of treatment (from 66.7 +/- 11 to 42.1 +/- 5, P< 0.05). Similar changes were noted in breakthrough pain intensity and and sleep efficiency. The only side effect was mild headache, which was self-limited to the first few days of NTG administration. We conclude that NTG added to etodolac appears to be effective for the treatment of CPP, with minimal side effects. Further randomized blinded studies are required.     

Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: Findings from a multicenter,randomized, open-label,phase 3 trial

Objective

To assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of once-daily oral atogepant 60 mg in adults with migraine.

Background

Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine.

Methods

A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of adults (18–80 years) with migraine. Lead-in trial completers or newly enrolled participants with 4–14 migraine days/month were enrolled and randomized (5:2) to atogepant 60 mg once daily or oral standard care (SC) migraine preventive medication. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of atogepant; safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale scores. Efficacy assessments (atogepant only) included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and the proportion of participants with reductions from baseline of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% in MMDs.

Results

The trial included 744 participants randomized to atogepant 60 mg (n = 546) or SC (n = 198). The atogepant safety population was 88.2% female (n = 479/543) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42.5 (12.0) years. TEAEs occurred in 67.0% (n = 364/543) of participants treated with atogepant 60 mg. The most commonly reported TEAEs (≥5%) were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%; 56/543), constipation (7.2%; 39/543), nausea (6.3%; 34/543), and urinary tract infection (5.2%; 28/543). Serious TEAEs were reported in 4.4% (24/543) for atogepant. Mean (standard error) change in MMDs for atogepant was −3.8 (0.1) for weeks 1–4 and −5.2 (0.2) at weeks 49–52. Similarly, the proportion of participants with ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions in MMDs increased from 60.4% (310/513), 37.2% (191/513), and 20.7% (106/513) at weeks 1–4 to 84.2% (282/335), 69.9% (234/335), and 48.4% (162/335), at weeks 49–52.

Conclusion

Daily use of oral atogepant 60 mg for preventive treatment of migraine during this 1-year, open-label trial was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious.