The risk of primary and contralateral breast cancer after ovarian cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of primary breast cancer (PBC) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in patients who had BRCA1/BRCA2‐associated epithelial ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS:

From the database of the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, patients who had BRCA‐associated OC without a history of unilateral breast cancer (BC) (at risk of PBC; n = 79) or with a history of unilateral BC (at risk of CBC; n = 37) were selected. The control groups consisted of unaffected BRCA mutation carriers (n = 351) or mutation carriers who had a previous unilateral BC (n = 294), respectively. The risks of PBC and CBC were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier survival method with death considered as a competing risk event.

RESULTS:

Women with BRCA‐associated OC had lower 2‐year, 5‐year, and 10‐year risks of PBC (3%, 6%, and 11%, respectively) compared with unaffected mutation carriers (6%, 16%, and 28%, respectively; P = .03), although they had a considerably higher mortality rate at similar time points (13%, 33%, and 61%, respectively, vs 1%, 2%, and 2%, respectively; P < .001). In BRCA mutation carriers with a previous unilateral BC, the 2‐year, 5‐year, and 10‐year risks of CBC were nonsignificantly lower in patients with OC than in those without OC (0%, 7%, and 7%, respectively, vs 6%, 16%, and 34%, respectively; P = .06), whereas the mortality rate was higher in patients with OC (19%, 34%, and 55%, respectively, vs 4%, 11%, and 21%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with BRCA‐associated OC had a lower risk of developing a subsequent PBC or CBC than mutation carriers without OC, whereas the risk of dying from OC was greater than the risk of developing BC. These data may facilitate more tailored counseling for this patient subgroup, although confirmative studies are warranted. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Improved survival for BRCA2-associated serous ovarian cancer compared with both BRCA-negative and BRCA1-associated serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND:

Multiple observational studies have suggested that breast cancer gene (BRCA)‐associated ovarian cancers have improved survival compared with BRCA‐negative ovarian cancers. However, most of those studies combined BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients or evaluated only BRCA1 patients. The objective of the current study was to examine whether BRCA1‐associated and BRCA2‐associated ovarian cancers were associated with different outcomes.

METHODS:

This was a single‐institution, retrospective analysis of patients who had a new diagnosis of histologically confirmed stage III or IV serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer between January 1, 1996 and February 1, 2011 and who underwent BRCA mutation testing on 1 of 2 institutional review board‐approved follow‐up studies. Patients who had been tested for BRCA mutations beyond 24 months of diagnosis were excluded from analysis to minimize selection bias from including patients who were referred for genetic testing because of long survival.

RESULTS:

Data from 190 patients (143 BRCA‐negative patients, 30 BRCA1‐positive patients, and 17 BRCA2‐positive patients) were analyzed. During the study period, 73 deaths were observed (60 BRCA‐negative patients, 10 BRCA1‐positive patients, 3 BRCA2‐positive patients). The median follow‐up for the remaining 117 survivors was 2.5 years. At 3 years, 69.4%, 90.7%, and 100% of BRCA‐negative patients, BRCA1‐positive patients, and BRCA2‐positive patients were alive, respectively. On univariate analysis, age, BRCA2 mutations, debulking status, and type of first‐line therapy (intravenous or intraperitoneal) were significant predictors of overall survival. On multivariate analysis, BRCA2 mutations (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.06‐0.65; P = .007), but not BRCA1 mutations (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.36‐1.38; P = .31), predicted for improved overall survival compared with BRCA‐negative patients. When carriers of BRCA2 mutations were directly compared with carriers of BRCA1 mutations, BRCA2 mutations appeared to confer improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.08‐1.05; P = .060), although this finding did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current data suggests that BRCA2 mutations confer an overall survival advantage compared with either being BRCA‐negative or having a BRCA1 mutation in high‐grade serous ovarian cancer. This finding may have important implications for clinical trial design. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Diabetes and breast cancer among women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

BACKGROUND:

Hyperinsulinemia and the metabolic syndrome are both risk factors for breast cancer. It is not clear if diabetes is associated with the risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

METHODS:

The authors reviewed the medical histories of 6052 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, half of whom had been diagnosed with breast cancer. They estimated the odds ratio for breast cancer, given a self‐report of diabetes. They then estimated the hazard ratio for a new diagnosis of diabetes associated with a history of breast cancer.

RESULTS:

There was no excess of diabetes in the period before the diagnosis of breast cancer, compared with controls with no diagnosis of breast cancer. The risk of diabetes was doubled among BRCA carriers in the 15‐year period after the diagnosis of breast cancer (relative risk, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4‐2.8; P = .0001), compared with carriers without cancer. The risk was particularly high for women with a body mass index (BMI) >25.0 kg/m² (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% CI, 4.0‐8.6; P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

After a diagnosis of breast cancer, women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation face a 2‐fold increase in the risk of diabetes, which is exacerbated by a high BMI. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish families with breast and pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND:

Germline mutations in the BRCA2 cancer susceptibility gene are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (PC). Breast‐pancreas cancer families with BRCA1 mutations have also been observed. The influence of a family history (FH) of PC on BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with breast cancer (BC) is unknown.

METHODS:

A clinical database review (2000‐2009) identified 211 Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) BC probands who 1) underwent BRCA1/2 mutation analysis by full gene sequencing or directed testing for Ashkenazi founder mutations (BRCA1: 185delAG and 5382insC; BRCA2: 6174delT) and 2) had a FH of PC in a first‐, second‐, or third‐degree relative. For each proband, the pretest probability of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation was estimated using the Myriad II model. The observed‐to‐expected (O:E) mutation prevalence was calculated for the entire group.

RESULTS:

Of the 211 AJ BC probands with a FH of PC, 30 (14.2%) harbored a BRCA mutation. Fourteen (47%) of the mutations were in BRCA1 and 16 (53%) were in BRCA2. Patients diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 50 years were found to have a higher BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence than probands with BC who were diagnosed at age > 50 years (21.1% vs 6.9%; P = .003). In patients with a first‐, second‐, or third‐degree relative with PC, mutation prevalences were 15.4%, 15.3%, and 8.6%, respectively (P = .58). In the overall group, the observed BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 14.2% versus an expected prevalence of 11.8% (O:E ratio, 1.21; P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS:

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are observed with nearly equal distribution in AJ breast‐pancreas cancer families, suggesting that both genes are associated with PC risk. In this population, a FH of PC was found to have a limited effect on mutation prevalence. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Prevalence of BRCA mutations in an unselected population of triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND:

This study assessed BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence in an unselected cohort of patients with triple‐negative breast cancer (BC).

METHODS:

One hundred ninety‐nine patients were enrolled. Triple negativity was defined as <1% estrogen and progesterone staining by immunohistochemistry and HER‐2/neu not overexpressed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Having given consent, patients had BRCA1 and BRCA2 full sequencing and large rearrangement analysis. Mutation prevalence was assessed among the triple‐negative BC patients and the subset of patients without a family history of breast/ovarian cancer. Independent pathological review was completed on 50 patients.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐one deleterious BRCA mutations were identified—13 in BRCA1 and 8 in BRCA2 (prevalence, 10.6%). In 153 patients (76.9%) without significant family history (first‐degree or second‐degree relatives with BC aged <50 years or ovarian cancer at any age), 8 (5.2%) mutations were found. By using prior National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommending testing for triple‐negative BC patients aged <45 years, 4 of 21 mutations (19%) would have been missed. Two of 21 mutations (10%) would have been missed using updated NCCN guidelines recommending testing for triple‐negative BC patients aged <60 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

The observed mutation rate was significantly higher (P = .0005) than expected based on previously established prevalence tables among patients unselected for pathology. BRCA1 mutation prevalence was lower, and BRCA2 mutation prevalence was higher, than previously described. Additional mutation carriers would have met new NCCN testing guidelines, underscoring the value of the updated criteria. Study data suggest that by increasing the age limit to 65 years, all carriers would have been identified. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Factors influencing ovulation and the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

The role of the lifetime number of ovulatory cycles has not been evaluated in the context of BRCA‐associated ovarian cancer. Thus, we conducted a matched case–control study to evaluate the relationship between the cumulative number of ovulatory cycles (and contributing components) and risk of developing ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers (1,329 cases and 5,267 controls). Information regarding reproductive and hormonal factors was collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate all associations. We observed a 45% reduction in the risk of developing ovarian cancer among women in the lowest vs. highest quartile of ovulatory cycles (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.41–0.75, p = 0.0001). Breastfeeding for more than 12 months was associated with a 38% (95% CI 0.48–0.79) and 50% (95% CI 0.29–0.84) reduction in risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. For oral contraceptive use, maximum benefit was seen with five or more years of use among BRCA1 mutation carriers (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40–0.63) and three or more years for BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.22–0.83). Increasing parity was associated with a significant inverse trend among BRCA1 (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.79–0.96; p‐trend = 0.005) but not BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81–1.19; p‐trend = 0.85). A later age at menopause was associated with an increased risk in women with a BRCA1 mutation (OR trend = 1.18; 95% CI 1.03–1.35; p = 0.02). These findings support an important role of breastfeeding and oral contraceptive use for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer among women carrying BRCA mutations.     

The efficacy of taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

BACKGROUND:

We assessed the efficacy of taxane chemotherapy in BRCA1‐ and BRCA2‐associated patients compared with sporadic metastatic breast cancer patients.

METHODS:

Response rates (RRs) to and progression‐free survival (PFS) after taxane chemotherapy of 35 BRCA1‐associated and 13 BRCA2‐associated metastatic breast cancer patients were compared with those outcomes in 95 matched (1:2) sporadic patients. Matching was performed for age at and year of diagnosis of primary breast cancer, year of metastatic disease, and line of therapy (first vs second or third).

RESULTS:

Among BRCA1‐associated patients, the RR was worse (objective response [OR], 23% vs 38%; progressive disease [PD], 60% vs 19%; P < 0.001); and the median PFS shorter (2.2 vs 4.9 months; P = 0.04) compared with sporadic patients. In the subgroup of hormone receptor (HRec)‐negative patients, BRCA1‐associated patients (n = 20) had a worse RR (OR, 20% vs 42%, respectively; PD, 70% vs 26%, respectively; P = 0.03) and a shorter PFS (1.8 vs 3.8 months; P = 0.004) compared with sporadic patients (n = 19). These outcomes in HRec‐positive patients were similar in BRCA1‐associated (n = 11) and sporadic (n = 61) patients (OR, 36% vs 38%; PD, 28% vs 20%; median PFS, both 5.7 months). In BRCA2‐associated patients, who were mainly HRec‐positive, the OR was higher than in sporadic patients (89% vs 38%, respectively; P = 0.02), whereas the median PFS was not significantly different (7.1 vs 5.7 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

BRCA1‐associated, HRec‐negative metastatic breast cancer patients were less sensitive to taxane chemotherapy than sporadic HRec‐negative patients. HRec‐positive BRCA1‐ and BRCA2‐associated patients had a sensitivity to taxane chemotherapy similar to that of sporadic patients. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Increased centrosome number in BRCA‐related breast cancer specimens determined by immunofluorescence analysis

BRCA‐related breast carcinoma can be prevented through prophylactic surgery and an intensive follow‐up regimen. However, BRCA genetic tests cannot be routinely performed, and some BRCA mutations could not be defined as deleterious mutations or normal variants. Therefore, an easy functional assay of BRCA will be useful to evaluate BRCA status. As it has been reported that BRCA functions in the regulation of centrosome number, we focused on centrosome number in cancer tissues. Here, 70 breast cancer specimens with known BRCA status were analyzed using immunofluorescence of γ‐tubulin (a marker of centrosome) foci. The number of foci per cell was higher in cases with BRCA mutation compared to wild‐type cases, that is, 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5‐2.3) vs 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2‐0.8) (P < .001). Specifically, foci numbers per cell in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation cases were 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6‐1.8) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7‐2.6), respectively, both higher than those in wild‐type cases (P = .042 and P < .0001, respectively). The predictive value of γ‐tubulin foci as determined by area under the curve (AUC = 0.86) for BRCA status was superior to BRCAPRO (AUC = 0.69), Myriad Table (AUC = 0.61), and KOHBRA BRCA risk calculator (AUC = 0.65) pretest values. The use of γ‐tubulin foci to predict BRCA status had sensitivity = 83% (19/23), specificity = 89% (42/47), and positive predictive value = 77% (20/26). Thus, γ‐tubulin immunofluorescence, a functional assessment of BRCA, can be used as a new prospective test of BRCA status.     

Outcome of ovarian cancer after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Background:

It is unknown whether a history of breast cancer (BC) affects the outcome of BRCA1/2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This was investigated in the current analysis.

Methods:

We included 386 BRCA1/2-associated EOC patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free interval (PFI), overall survival (OS) and ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS) were compared between EOC patients with and without previous BC.

Results:

BRCA-associated EOC patients with, vs without, a BC history had a significantly worse PFS and PFI (multivariate hazard ratio (HR_mult) 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–2.08 and HR_mult 1.43; 95% CI 1.01–2.03), and a non-significantly worse OS (HR_mult 1.15; 95% CI 0.84–1.57) and OCSS (HR_mult 1.18; 95% CI 0.85–1.62). Ovarian cancer-specific survival was significantly worse for the subgroup treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for BC (HR_mult 1.99; 95% CI 1.21–3.31).

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that BRCA1/2-associated EOC patients with a previous BC have a worse outcome than EOC patients without BC, especially when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.     

The association between smoking and cancer incidence in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Tobacco smoke is an established carcinogen, but the association between tobacco smoking and cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the association between tobacco smoking and cancer incidence in a cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The study population consisted of unaffected BRCA mutation carriers. Information on lifestyle including smoking histories, reproductive factors, and past medical histories was obtained through questionnaires. Incident cancers were updated biennially via follow‐up questionnaires. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using time‐dependent Cox regression models. There were 700 incident cancers diagnosed over 26,711 person‐years of follow‐up. The most frequent cancers seen in BRCA mutation carriers were breast (n = 428; 61%) and ovarian (n = 109; 15%) cancer. Compared to nonsmokers, (ever) smoking was associated with a modest increased risk of all cancers combined (HR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.01–1.37). Women in the highest group of total pack‐years (4.3–9.8) had an increased risk of developing any cancer (HR = 1.27; 95%CI 1.04–1.56), breast cancer (HR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.02–1.75), and ovarian cancer (HR = 1.68; 95%CI 1.06–2.67) compared to never smokers. The associations between tobacco smoking and cancer did not differ by BRCA mutation type or by age at diagnosis. This prospective study suggests that tobacco smoking is associated with a modest increase in the risks of breast and ovarian cancer among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.     

Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers

Background:

The BRCA1/2 proteins are involved in regulation of cellular proliferation by DNA damage repair via homologous recombination. Therefore, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with pancreatic cancer may have distinct biologic outcomes.

Methods:

Patients with BRCA1/2-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) diagnosed between January 1994 and December 2012 were identified from databases at three participating institutions. Clinical data were collected. Disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) were analysed.

Results:

Overall, 71 patients with PDAC and BRCA1 (n=21), BRCA2 (n=49) or both (n=1) mutations were identified. Mean age at diagnosis was 60.3 years (range 33–83), 81.7% (n=58) had any family history of malignancy; 30% (n=21) underwent primary resection. Out of 71 participants, 12 received experimental therapy; one patient had missing data, these 13 cases were excluded from OS analysis. Median OS for 58 patients was 14 months (95% CI 10–23 months). Median OS for patients with stage 1/2 disease has not been reached with 52% still alive at 60 months. Median OS for stage 3/4 was 12 months (95% CI 6–15). Superior OS was observed for patients with stage 3/4 treated with platinum vs those treated with non-platinum chemotherapies (22 vs 9 months; P=0.039).

Conclusion:

Superior OS was observed for advanced-disease BRCA-associated PDAC with platinum exposure.     

The incidence of pancreatic cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Background:

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to pancreatic cancer. We estimated the incidence of pancreatic cancer in a cohort of female carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation. We also estimated survival rates in pancreatic cancer cases from families with a BRCA mutation.

Methods:

We followed 5149 women with a mutation for new cases of pancreatic cancer. The standardised incidence ratios (SIR) for pancreatic cancer were calculated based on age group and country of residence. We also reviewed the pedigrees of 8140 pedigrees with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation for those with a case of pancreatic cancer. We recorded the year of diagnosis and the year of death for 351 identified cases.

Results:

Eight incident pancreatic cancer cases were identified among all mutation carriers. The SIR for BRCA1 carriers was 2.55 (95% CI=1.03–5.31, P=0.04) and for BRCA2 carriers was 2.13 (95% CI=0.36–7.03, P=0.3). The 5-year survival rate was 5% for cases from a BRCA1 family and 4% for cases from a BRCA2 family.

Conclusion:

The risk of pancreatic cancer is approximately doubled in female BRCA carriers. The poor survival in familial pancreatic cancer underscores the need for novel anti-tumoural strategies.     

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimBRCA mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has been shown to reduce OC risk. This meta-analysis was aim to analyze the effect of RRSO on the BC risk among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.MethodsEmbase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies investigating the effect of RRSO on BC risk. The pooled results were used to evaluate the association between RRSO and BC risk.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 13,965 BRCA1 and 7,057 BRCA2 mutation carriers from 14 observational studies. The pooled results showed that RRSO lowered BC risk among BRCA1 mutation carriers [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.81, P < 0.01] and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34–0.75, P < 0.01). RRSO reduced BC risk in younger women with BRCA1 mutation (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30–0.77, P < 0.01) and BRCA2 mutation (HR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08–0.65, P < 0.01). Analysis of the efficacy of RRSO at different time intervals after surgery showed a reduction of BC risk at <5 years after surgery in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40–0.89, P = 0.01) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.86, P = 0.02).ConclusionsRRSO is an effective way to reduce BC risk among women with BRCA1/2 mutation, especially in younger women. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers could benefit from RRSO in the immediate 5 years after surgery.     

Survival outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients by germline BRCA1/2 status in a large multicenter real-world database

The outcomes and best treatment strategies for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain uncertain. We compared the overall survival and the first line progression free survival (PFS1) of patients with a gBRCAm identified at initiation of first-line treatment with those of BRCA wild-type (WT) and not-tested (NT) individuals in the ESME real-world database of MBC patients between 2008 and 2016 (NCT03275311). Among the 20 624 eligible patients, 325 had a gBRCAm, 1138 were WT and 19 161 NT. Compared with WT, gBRCAm carriers were younger, and had more aggressive diseases. At a median follow-up of 50.5 months, median OS was 30.6 (95%CI: 21.9-34.3), 35.8 (95%CI: 32.2-37.8) and 39.3 months (95% CI: 38.3-40.3) in the gBRCAm, WT and NT subgroups, respectively. Median PFS1 was 7.9 (95%CI: 6.6-9.3), 7.8 (95%CI: 7.3-8.5) and 9.7 months (95%CI, 9.5-10.0). In the multivariable analysis conducted in the whole cohort, gBRCAm status had however no independent prognostic impact on OS and PFS1. Though, in the triple-negative subgroup, gBRCAm patients had better OS and PFS1 (HR vs WT = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.60-0.97; P = .027 and 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55-0.86; P = .001, respectively). In contrast, in patients with HR+/HER2 negative cancers, PFS1 appeared significantly and OS non significantly lower for gBRCAm carriers (PFS1: HR vs WT = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.03-1.46; P = .024; OS:HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97-1.52, P = .089). In conclusion, gBRCA1/2 status appears to have divergent survival effects in MBC according to IHC subtype.     

CK8/18 expression, the basal phenotype, and family history in identifying BRCA1-associated breast cancer in the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry

BACKGROUND.

BRCA1‐associated breast cancer had been shown to be morphologically and genetically distinct from sporadic cancers. The aim of this study was to determine the association of CK8/18 with BRCA1‐associated tumors and if, by using CK8/18 and basal biomarkers in conjunction with morphologic features and family history characteristics, the specificity of the BRCA1‐associated tumor profile in a pathologically well‐characterized cohort would be improved.

METHODS.

Fifty‐eight patients with known BRCA1 germline mutations and 221 control (familial non‐BRCA) patients were selected from the Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry. From this database, information on family history and morphologic features was abstracted. Tissue microarrays were constructed and immunohistochemistry to determine expression of several biomarkers was performed. After a logistic regression fit, a best‐subsets variable‐selection procedure using model performance and predictive ability measures was applied to find a best predictor to distinguish BRCA1‐associated tumors from non‐BRCA associated tumors.

RESULTS.

BRCA1‐associated tumors differed significantly from control tumors in terms of morphology, family history, and biomarker profile. CK8/18 was highly significantly associated with BRCA1 tumors. Consistently, BRCA1 cancers showed low levels of CK8/18 compared to non‐BRCA tumors, whether they were basal‐like or not. A combination of 7 factors, including CK8/18 and family history, best predicted the BRCA1‐associated cancers.

CONCLUSIONS.

CK8/18 expression was independently associated with BRCA1‐associated breast cancers. Reduced CK8/18 expression in conjunction with the basal‐like phenotype and family history may have improved the ability to identify which tumors were likely to be associated with a BRCA1 germline mutation and thereby help streamline genetic testing. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Earlier age of onset of BRCA mutation-related cancers in subsequent generations

BACKGROUND:

Women who are diagnosed with a deleterious mutation in either breast cancer (BRCA) gene have a high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers at young ages. In this study, the authors assessed age at diagnosis in 2 generations of families with known mutations to investigate for earlier onset in subsequent generations.

METHODS:

Of the 132 BRCA‐positive women with breast cancer who participated in a high‐risk protocol at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Gen 2), 106 women could be paired with a family member in the previous generation (Gen 1) who was diagnosed with a BRCA‐related cancer (either breast cancer or ovarian cancer). Age at diagnosis, location of the mutation, and year of birth were recorded. A previously published parametric anticipation model was applied in these genetically predisposed families.

RESULTS:

The median age of cancer diagnosis was 42 years (range, 28‐55 years) in Gen 2 and 48 years (range, 30‐72 years) in Gen 1 (P < .001). In the parametric model, the estimated change in the expected age at onset for the entire cohort was 7.9 years (P < .0001). Statistically significant earlier ages at diagnosis also were observed within subgroups of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, maternal inheritance, paternal inheritance, breast cancer only, and breast cancer‐identified and ovarian cancer‐identified families.

CONCLUSIONS:

Breast and ovarian cancers in BRCA mutation carriers appeared to be diagnosed at an earlier age in later generations. The authors concluded that patients who are younger at the onset of BRCA‐related cancers should continue to be tracked to offer appropriate screening modalities at appropriate ages. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Risk Reduction and Survival Benefit of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in Hereditary Breast Cancer: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Background

Objections have been raised to performing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to reduce disease incidence and mortality of women with BRCA mutations. We aimed to examine the relationship between RRSO and breast cancer (BC) risk and mortality with a meta-analysis.

Predictive factors for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women with ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND:

It is unclear whether women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), like their counterparts with invasive breast cancer, warrant genetic risk assessment and testing on the basis of high‐risk variables. The authors of this report identified predictive factors for mutations in the breast cancer‐susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women who were diagnosed with DCIS.

METHODS:

One hundred eighteen women with DCIS who were referred for genetic counseling and underwent genetic testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations between 2003 and 2010 were included in the study. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the associations between potential predictive factors and BRCA status.

RESULTS:

Of 118 high‐risk women with DCIS, 27% (n = 32) tested positive for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Of those, 10% (n = 12) and 17% (n = 20) had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Age, race, and tumor characteristics did not differ between BRCA noncarriers and carriers. In a multivariate logistic model, ≥2 relatives with ovarian cancer (OC) (odds ratio [OR], 8.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38‐56.29; P = .034), and a score ≥10% according to the BRCAPRO mathematical model for calculating the probability that a particular family member carries a germline BRCA mutation (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.23‐18.22; P = .0005) remained as independent significant predictors for a BRCA mutation. Fifty‐seven percent of mutation carriers but only 25% of noncarriers underwent prophylactic mastectomy(P = .0037). This difference remained significant for patients aged ≤40 years (P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS:

Women who had DCIS and a family history of OC or who had BRCAPRO scores ≥10% had a high rate of BRCA positivity regardless of age at diagnosis. These findings suggest that high‐risk patients with DCIS are appropriate candidates for genetic testing for BRCA mutations in the presence of predictive factors even if they do not have invasive breast cancer. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Incidence of colorectal cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from a follow-up study

Background:

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer increased susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer and to a spectrum of other cancers. There is controversy regarding the risk of colorectal cancer conferred by germline mutations in these two genes.

Methods:

We followed 7015 women with a BRCA mutation for new cases of colorectal cancer. Incidence rates in carriers were compared with population-specific incidence rates, and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were estimated. The expected numbers of cancers were computed by multiplying person–years at risk by the appropriate age-, sex- and country-specific incidence rates from the five countries.

Results:

Twenty-one incident colorectal cancer cases were observed among all mutation carriers, compared with 23.6 cases expected. The SIR for BRCA1 carriers was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–1.40, P=0.7) and for BRCA2 carriers was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.30–1.81, P=0.7). The SIR for colon cancer was 3.81 (95% CI 1.77–7.23) for women below the age of 50 years (both genes combined) and was 0.60 (95% CI 0.33–1.00) for women aged 50 years and above.

Conclusion:

The risk of colorectal cancer is increased in female carriers of BRCA1 mutations below the age of 50 years but not in women with BRCA2 mutations or in older women.     

The spectrum of BRCA mutations and characteristics of BRCA‐associated breast cancers in China: Screening of 2,991 patients and 1,043 controls by next‐generation sequencing

To characterize the prevalence of BRCA mutations and characteristics of BRCA carriers in China and to update the clinical recommendations for BRCA testing, we conducted a wide screen for BRCA mutations using next‐generation sequencing (NGS). A total of 4,034 Chinese subjects were screened for germline BRCA1/2 mutations, including 2,991 breast cancer patients and 1,043 healthy individuals from the community enrolled as controls. We developed an NGS‐based approach to perform BRCA1/2 screening. BRCA mutations were identified in 9.1% (232/2,560) of cases with at least one risk factor, in 3.5% (15/431) of sporadic patients and in 0.38% (4/1,043) of healthy controls. The mutation frequency ranged from 8.9 to 15.2% in cohorts with a single risk factor to 16.6–100% in groups with multiple risk factors. We identified 70 novel BRCA mutations. A high frequency of BRCA1 c.5470_5477del was detected, accounting for 13.9% (16/115) of the BRCA1 mutations detected in our study. Clinical characteristics such as family history, invasive carcinoma, negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), high Ki67 index, lymph node status, and high tumour grade were closely related to BRCA mutations. BRCA2 carriers had poorer disease‐free survival among HER2‐ or hormone receptor‐positive patients (hazard ratio = 1.892; 95% confidence interval: 1.132–3.161; p = 0.013). This study shows that BRCA mutation carriers could be frequently identified among breast cancer patients with multiple risk factors. Importantly, we established an NGS‐based pipeline for BRCA1/2 testing in clinical practice and strongly suggest that breast cancer patients of premier‐ and moderate‐grade risks receive BRCA1/2 mutations testing in China.