Pursuit eye movements and their neural control in the monkey

1. Single units in the 3. and 6. nerve nuclei were recorded, together with the stimulus and eye movements in trained macaques during pursuit eye movements. 2. The relationship between the impulse rate of an oculomotor motoneuron and the corresponding eye movements can be described by a first order differential equation only, if distinctions are made between the modes of the oculomotor system (e.g., fixation or pursuit) and between the agonist phase and the antagonist phase of the corresponding eye muscle. 3. The trained monkeys showed a frequency response during pursuit eye movements, which was comparable to that of humans and which clearly indicates the existence of a predictor mechanism. 4. After sudden stimulus disappearance in the pursuit mode, both the neural impulse rate and the eye movement performed smooth changes for more than 1s. These slow post-pursuit eye movements were related to the time course before stimulus disappearance. 5. Our findings lead to the hypothesis, that pursuit eye movements in primates, if elicited by small moving visual stimuli, are generated by means of a feedback system consisting of a predictor mechanism, the parameters of which are continuously corrected by an updating process in the afferent visual system.     

Initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements to first-order and second-order motion stimuli

Since normal human subjects can perform smooth-pursuit eye movements only in the presence of a moving target, the occurrence of these eye movements represents an ideal behavioural probe to monitor the successful processing of visual motion. It has been shown previously that subjects can execute smooth-pursuit eye movements to targets defined by luminance and colour, the first-order stimulus attributes, as well as to targets defined by derived, second-order stimulus attributes such as contrast, flicker or motion. In contrast to these earlier experiments focusing on steady-state pursuit, the present study addressed the course of pre-saccadic pursuit initiation (less than 100 ms), as this early time period is thought to represent open-loop pursuit, i.e. the eye movements are exclusively driven by visual inputs proceeding the onset of the eye movement itself. Eye movements of five human subjects tracking first- and second-order motion stimuli had been measured. The analysis of the obtained eye traces revealed that smooth-pursuit eye movements could be initiated to first-order as well as second-order motion stimuli, even before the execution of the first initial saccade. In contrast to steady-state pursuit, the initiation of pursuit was not exclusively determined by the movement of the target, but rather due to an interaction between dominant first-order and less-weighted second-order motion components. Based on our results, two conclusions may be drawn: first and specific for initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements, we present evidence supporting the notion that initiation of pursuit reflects integration of all available visual motion information. Second and more general, our results further support the hypothesis that the visual system consists of more than one mechanism for the extraction of first-order and second-order motion.     

Sensory versus motor loci for integration of multiple motion signals in smooth pursuit eye movements and human motion perception

We have investigated how visual motion signals are integrated for smooth pursuit eye movements by measuring the initiation of pursuit in monkeys for pairs of moving stimuli of the same or differing luminance. The initiation of pursuit for pairs of stimuli of the same luminance could be accounted for as a vector average of the responses to the two stimuli singly. When stimuli comprised two superimposed patches of moving dot textures, the brighter stimulus suppressed the inputs from the dimmer stimulus, so that the initiation of pursuit became winner-take-all when the luminance ratio of the two stimuli was 8 or greater. The dominance of the brighter stimulus could be not attributed to either the latency difference or the ratio of the eye accelerations for the bright and dim stimuli presented singly. When stimuli comprised either spot targets or two patches of dots moving across separate locations in the visual field, the brighter stimulus had a much weaker suppressive influence; the initiation of pursuit could be accounted for by nearly equal vector averaging of the responses to the two stimuli singly. The suppressive effects of the brighter stimulus also appeared in human perceptual judgments, but again only for superimposed stimuli. We conclude that one locus of the interaction of two moving visual stimuli is shared by perception and action and resides in local inhibitory connections in the visual cortex. A second locus resides deeper in sensory-motor processing and may be more closely related to action selection than to stimulus selection.     

Contextual effects on smooth-pursuit eye movements

Segregating a moving object from its visual context is particularly relevant for the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements. We examined the interaction between a moving object and a stationary or moving visual context to determine the role of the context motion signal in driving pursuit. Eye movements were recorded from human observers to a medium-contrast Gaussian dot that moved horizontally at constant velocity. A peripheral context consisted of two vertically oriented sinusoidal gratings, one above and one below the stimulus trajectory, that were either stationary or drifted into the same or opposite direction as that of the target at different velocities. We found that a stationary context impaired pursuit acceleration and velocity and prolonged pursuit latency. A drifting context enhanced pursuit performance, irrespective of its motion direction. This effect was modulated by context contrast and orientation. When a context was briefly perturbed to move faster or slower eye velocity changed accordingly, but only when the context was drifting along with the target. Perturbing a context into the direction orthogonal to target motion evoked a deviation of the eye opposite to the perturbation direction. We therefore provide evidence for the use of absolute and relative motion cues, or motion assimilation and motion contrast, for the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements.     

Visual motion processing for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans

We have used the initiation of pursuit eye movements as a tool to reveal properties of motion processing in the neural pathways that provide inputs to the human pursuit system. Horizontal and vertical eye position were recorded with a magnetic search coil in six normal adults. Stimuli were provided by individual trials of ramp target motion. Analysis was restricted to the first 100 ms of eye movement, which precedes the onset of corrective feedback. By recording the transient response to target motion at speeds the pursuit motor system can achieve, we investigated the visual properties of images that initiate pursuit. We have found effects of varying the retinal location, the direction, the velocity, the intensity, and the size of the stimulus. Eye acceleration in the first 100 ms of pursuit depended on both the direction of target motion and the initial position of the moving target. For horizontal target motion, eye acceleration was highest if the stimulus was close to the center of the visual field and moved toward the vertical meridian. For vertical target motion, eye acceleration was highest when the stimulus moved upward or downward within the lower visual field. The shape of the relationship between eye acceleration and initial target position was similar for target velocities ranging from 1.0 to 45 degrees/s. The initiation of pursuit showed two components that had different visual properties and were expressed early and late in the first 100 ms of pursuit. In the first 20 ms, instantaneous eye acceleration was in the direction of target motion but did not depend on other visual properties of the stimulus. At later times (e.g., 80-100 ms after pursuit initiation), instantaneous eye acceleration was strongly dependent on each property we tested. Targets that started close to and moved toward the position of fixation evoked the highest eye accelerations. For high-intensity targets, eye acceleration increased steadily as target velocity increased. For low-intensity targets, eye acceleration was selective for target velocities of 30-45 degrees/s. The properties of pursuit initiation in humans, including the differences between the early and late components, are remarkably similar to those reported by Lisberger and Westbrook (12) in monkeys. Our data provide evidence that the cell populations responsible for motion processing are similar in humans and monkeys and imply that the functional organization of the visual cortex is similar in the two species.     

Eye movement and visual motion perception in schizophrenia I: Apparent motion evoked smooth pursuit eye movement reveals a hidden dysfunction in smooth pursuit eye movement in schizophrenia

To date, smooth pursuit eye movement in schizophrenia has only been investigated using a target stimulus in continuous motion. However, smooth pursuit can also be evoked by an oscillating jumping dot that appears to be in apparent motion and although there is no continuous motion on the retinal surface this apparently moving stimulus can effortlessly elicit smooth-pursuit eye movement. In the first of two experiments smooth pursuit eye movement was evoked by target stimuli in continuous (real) motion at seven target velocities from 5.0 to 35.0 deg/s, and in a second experiment it was measured in response to an oscillating jumping dot in apparent motion at eight target velocities from 5.0 to 25.0 deg/s in a group with mixed-symptoms in schizophrenia and in a control group. The results of Experiment 1 provided no evidence for a dysfunction in continuous motion evoked smooth pursuit eye movement in the group with schizophrenia. However, following the removal of saccadic eye movements in smooth pursuit, the group with schizophrenia showed significantly lower smooth pursuit eye velocity at target velocities from 20.0 to 35.0 deg/s. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that apparent motion evoked smooth pursuit eye velocity in the group with schizophrenia was significantly lower in comparison with normal observers at all target velocities up to 25.0 deg/s with the inclusion or exclusion of saccadic eye movements. The findings demonstrate that overall smooth pursuit eye movement evoked in response to a continuous (real) motion target in the group with schizophrenia may nevertheless contain a hidden temporal resolution and integration dysfunction that is revealed when smooth pursuit eye movement is evoked in response to an oscillating jumping dot in apparent motion. The findings also demonstrate that normal smooth pursuit eye movement in normal observers can be made to resemble the dysfunctional smooth pursuit eye movement that is naturally found in some people with schizophrenia by using a target stimulus in apparent motion.     

Direction and speed tuning to visual motion in cortical areas MT and MSTd during smooth pursuit eye movements

When tracking a moving target in the natural world with pursuit eye movement, our visual system must compensate for the self-induced retinal slip of the visual features in the background to enable us to perceive their actual motion. We previously reported that the speed of the background stimulus in space is represented by dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) neurons in the monkey cortex, which compensate for retinal image motion resulting from eye movements when the direction of the pursuit and background motion are parallel to the preferred direction of each neuron. To further characterize the compensation observed in the MSTd responses to the background motion, we recorded single unit activities in cortical areas middle temporal (MT) and MSTd, and we selected neurons responsive to a large-field visual stimulus. We studied their responses to the large-field stimulus in the background while monkeys pursued a moving target and while fixated a stationary target. We investigated whether compensation for retinal image motion of the background depended on the speed of pursuit. We also asked whether the directional selectivity of each neuron in relation to the external world remained the same even during pursuit and whether compensation for retinal image motion occurred irrespective of the direction of the pursuit. We found that the majority of the MSTd neurons responded to the visual motion in space by compensating for the image motion on the retina resulting from the pursuit regardless of pursuit speed and direction, whereas most of the MT neurons responded in relation to the genuine retinal image motion.     

Effect of eye movements on the magnitude of functional magnetic resonance imaging responses in extrastriate cortex during visual motion perception

We have studied the effects of pursuit eye movements on the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses in extrastriate visual areas during visual motion perception. Echoplanar imaging of 10–12 image planes through visual cortex was acquired in nine subjects while they viewed sequences of random-dot motion. Images obtained during stimulation periods were compared with baseline images, where subjects viewed a blank field. In a subsidiary experiment, responses to moving dots, viewed under conditions of fixation or pursuit, were compared with those evoked by static dots. Eye movements were recorded with MR-compatible electro-oculographic (EOG) electrodes. Our findings show an enhanced level of activation (as indexed by blood-oxygen level-dependent contrast) during pursuit compared with fixation in two extrastriate areas. The results support earlier findings on a motion-specific area in lateral occipitotemporal cortex (human V5). They also point to a further site of activation in a region approximately 12 mm dorsal of V5. The fMRI response in V5 during pursuit is significantly enhanced. This increased response may represent additional processing demands required for the control of eye movements. Received: 16 July 1997 / Accepted: 14 October 1997     

Response properties of dorsolateral pontine units during smooth pursuit in the rhesus macaque

1. The anatomical connections of the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) implicate it in the production of smooth-pursuit eye movements. It receives inputs from cortical structures believed to be involved in visual motion processing (middle temporal cortex) or motion execution (posterior parietal cortex) and projects to the flocculus of the cerebellum, which is involved in smooth pursuit. To determine the role of the DLPN in smooth pursuit, we have studied the discharge patterns of 191 DLPN neurons in five monkeys trained to make smooth-pursuit eye movements of a spot moving either across a patterned background or in darkness. 2. Four unit types could be distinguished. Visual units (15%) discharged in response to movement of a large textured pattern, often in a direction-selective fashion but not during smooth pursuit of a spot in the dark. Eye movement neurons (31%) discharged during sinusoidal smooth pursuit in the dark with peak discharge rate either at peak eye position or peak eye velocity, but they showed no response during background movement or during other visual stimulation. These units continued to discharge when the target was extinguished (blanked) briefly, and the monkey continued to make smooth eye movements in the dark. The majority (54%) of our DLPN units discharged during both smooth pursuit in the dark and background movement while the monkey fixated. Blanking the target during smooth pursuit revealed that these units fell into two distinct classes. Visual pursuit units ceased discharging during a blank, suggesting that they had only a visual sensitivity. Pursuit and visual units continued to discharge during the blank, indicating that they had a combined oculomotor and visual sensitivity. 3. Ninety-five percent of the units that discharged during smooth pursuit were direction selective. These units had rather broad directional tuning curves with widths at half height ranging from 65 to 180 degrees. Many preferred directions for DLPN units were observed, although the vertical and near-vertical directions predominated. 4. Most units that responded to large-field background movement were direction selective. During sinusoidal movement of a large-field background, half of them also discharged in relation to stimulus velocity, whereas others did not.     

The effects of preceding moving stimuli on the initial part of smooth pursuit eye movement

We examined whether there are any adaptive effects on the pursuit initiation after a prolonged exposure to moving visual stimuli. The eye movements of six human subjects were recorded with the scleral search-coil technique or a Dual Purkinje Image Eye-tracker system. A random-dot image appeared on a CRT monitor and moved coherently in one direction (rightward or leftward) at 10 deg/s for 4 s, while the subject fixated on a stationary target (conditioning stimulus). The screen was blanked for 0.2 s, and then the target stepped to the right or left of the center and moved 10 deg/s leftward or rightward. We measured change in the eye position over the open-loop period of the pursuit initiation. When the pursuit target moved in the same direction as the preceding visual stimulus, a significant reduction in the initial tracking responses (55.9% decrease on average) was found. We then studied in detail the properties of the motion adaptation in pursuit initiation by varying the visual conditions systematically and obtained the following findings. When the subjects tracked the target that moved at 10 deg/s, the pursuit initiation was affected not only by the conditioning stimulus of the same speed as the target, but also by those of different speeds. Further, the conditioning stimulus moving at 10 deg/s affected the pursuit initiation not only when the target moved with the same speed but also when it moved at different speeds (more remarkable for slower speeds). The effect of conditioning stimuli on the pursuit initiation was larger when the duration of the conditioning period was longer. The effect of conditioning stimuli decayed as the duration of the blank period became longer. The findings from the present study are consistent with the properties of neurons in the middle temporal area of monkeys.     

Discharge patterns of neurons in the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in the behaving primate

1. To determine the possible role of the primate pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in the generation of optokinetic and smooth-pursuit eye movements, we recorded the activity of 155 single units in four behaving rhesus macaques. The monkeys were trained to fixate a stationary target spot during visual testing and to track a small moving spot in a variety of visual environments. 2. The majority (82%) of NOT neurons responded only to visual stimuli. Most units responded vigorously for large-field (70 x 50 degrees) moving visual stimuli and responded less, if at all, during smooth-pursuit eye movements in the dark; many of these units had large receptive fields (greater than 10 x 10 degrees) that included the fovea. The remaining visual units responded more vigorously during smooth-pursuit eye movements in the dark than during movement of large-field visual stimuli; all but one had small receptive fields (less than 10 x 10 degrees) that included the fovea. For all visual units that responded during smooth pursuit, extinction of the small moving target so briefly that pursuit continued caused the firing rates to drop to resting levels, confirming that the discharge was due to visual stimulation of receptive fields with foveal and perifoveal movement sensitivity and not to smooth-pursuit eye movements per se. 3. Eighteen percent of all NOT units ceased their tonic discharge in association with all saccades including the quick phases accompanying optokinetic or vestibular nystagmus. The pause in firing began after saccade onset, was unrelated to saccade duration, and occurred even in complete darkness. 4. Most (90%) of the visual NOT units were direction selective. They exhibited an increase in firing above resting during horizontal (ipsilateral) background movement and/or during smooth pursuit of a moving spot and a decrease in firing during contralateral movement. 5. The firing rates of NOT units were highly dependent on stimulus velocity. All had velocity thresholds of less than 1 degree/s and exhibited a monotonic increase in firing rate with visual stimulus velocity over part (n = 90%) or all (n = 10%) of the tested range (i.e., 1-200 degrees/s). Most NOT units exhibited velocity tuning with an average preferred velocity of 64 degrees/s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Response properties of single units in the lateral terminal nucleus of the accessory optic system in the behaving primate

1. To determine the potential role of the primate accessory optic system (AOS) in optokinetic and smooth-pursuit eye movements, we recorded the activity of 110 single units in a subdivision of the AOS, the lateral terminal nucleus (LTN), in five alert rhesus macaques. All monkeys were trained to fixate a stationary target spot during visual testing and to track a small spot moving in a variety of visual environments. 2. LTN units formed a continuum of types ranging from purely visual to purely oculomotor. Visual units (50%) responded best for large-field (70 x 50 degrees), moving visual stimuli and had no response associated with smooth-pursuit eye movement; some responded during smooth pursuit in the dark, but the response disappeared if the target was briefly extinguished, indicating that their smooth-pursuit-related response reflected activation of a parafoveal receptive field. Eye movement and visual units (36%) responded both for large, moving visual stimuli and during smooth-pursuit eye movements made in the dark. Eye movement units (14%) discharged during smooth-pursuit or other eye movements but showed no evidence of visual sensitivity. 3. Essentially all (98%) LTN units were direction selective, responding preferentially during vertical background and/or smooth-pursuit movement. The vast majority (88%) preferred upward background and/or eye movement. During periodic movement of the large-field visual background while the animal fixated, their firing rates were modulated above and below rather high resting rates. Although LTN units typically responded best to movement of large-field stimuli, some also responded well to small moving stimuli (0.25 degrees diam). 4. LTN units could be separated into two populations according to their dependence on visual stimulus velocity. For periodic triangle wave stimuli, both types had velocity thresholds less than 3 degrees/s. As stimulus velocity increased above threshold, the activity of one type reached peak firing rates over a very narrow velocity range and remained nearly at peak firing for velocities from approximately 4-80 degrees/s. The firing rates of the other type exhibited velocity tuning in which the firing rate peaked at an average preferred velocity of 13 degrees/s and decreased for higher velocities. 5. A close examination of firing rates to sinusoidal background stimuli revealed that both unit types exhibited unusual behaviors at the extremes of stimulus velocity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Blink effects on ongoing smooth pursuit eye movements in humans

Blinks are known to affect eye movements, e.g., saccades, slow and fast vergence, and saccade-vergence interaction, in two ways: by superimposition of blink-associated eye movements and changes of the central premotor activity in the brainstem. The goal of this study was to determine, for the first time, the effects of trigeminal evoked blinks on ongoing smooth pursuit eye movements which could be related to visual sensory or premotor neuronal changes. This was compared to the effect of a target disappearing for 100–300 ms duration during ongoing smooth pursuit (blank paradigm) in order to control for the visual sensory effects of a blink. Eye and blink movements were recorded in eight healthy subjects with the scleral search coil technique. Blink-associated eye movements during the first 50% of the blink duration were non-linearly superimposed on the smooth pursuit eye movements. Immediately after the blink-associated eye movements, the pursuit velocity slowly decreased by an average of 3.2±2.1°/s. This decrease was not dependent on the stimulus direction. The pursuit velocity decrease caused by blinks which occluded the pupil more than 50% could be explained mostly by blanking the visual target. However, small blinks that did not occlude the pupil (<10% of lid closure) also decreased smooth pursuit velocity. Thus, this blink effect on pursuit velocity cannot be explained by blink-associated eye movements or by the blink having blanked the visual input. We propose that part of this effect might either be caused by incomplete visual suppression during blinks and/or a change in the activity of omnipause neurons.     

Saccades and pursuit: two outcomes of a single sensorimotor process

Saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements are two different modes of oculomotor control. Saccades are primarily directed toward stationary targets whereas smooth pursuit is elicited to track moving targets. In recent years, behavioural and neurophysiological data demonstrated that both types of eye movements work in synergy for visual tracking. This suggests that saccades and pursuit are two outcomes of a single sensorimotor process that aims at orienting the visual axis.     

Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. III. Interaction with full-field visual stimulation

1. Pursuit eye movements are usually made against a visual background that is moved across the retina by the pursuit movement. We have investigated the effect of this visual stimulation on the response of pursuit cells that lie within the superior temporal sulcus (STS) of the monkey. 2. We assigned these pursuit cells to one of two groups depending on the nature of their preferred visual stimulus. One group of cells, comprising all cells located in the dorsal-medial region of the medial superior temporal area (MSTd) and some cells in lateral-anterior MST (MST1), responded to the motion of a large patterned field but showed little or no response to small spots or slits. The other group, consisting of all foveal middle temporal area (MTf) cells and many MST1 cells, responded preferentially to small spot motion or equally well to small spot motion or large field. 3. For many pursuit cells that preferred large-field stimuli, the visual response showed a reversal of the preferred direction of motion as the size of the stimulus field increased. The reversal usually occurred as the size of the moving random-dot field used as a stimulus increased in size from 20 x 20 degrees to 30 x 30 degrees for motion at approximately 10 degrees/s. The size of the filed stimulus leading to reversal of preferred direction depended on the speed of stimulus motion. Higher speeds of motion required larger stimulus fields to produce a reversal of preferred direction. This reversal (of preferred direction) did not reflect a center-surround organization of the receptive field but seemed to reflect the spatial summation properties of these cells. 4. For three-quarters of the cells that preferred large-field stimulation, the preferred direction of motion for the large field was opposite to the preferred direction of the pursuit response. The remaining cells showed either the same preferred directions for large-field visual stimulation and the pursuit response or had bidirectional visual responses. If we consider only the cells that show a reversal of preferred direction for large- and small-field stimuli, the preferred direction for the large field was always the opposite to that of pursuit, and the preferred direction for the small field was always the same. 5. During pursuit against a lighted background, the cells that showed opposite preferred directions for large-field stimulation and pursuit had synergistic responses--a facilitation of the pursuit response over the response during pursuit in the dark. Slow pursuit speeds (less than 20 degrees/s) produced the greatest facilitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Visual responses of pulvinar and collicular neurons during eye movements of awake, trained macaques.

1. We recorded from single neurons in awake, trained rhesus monkeys in a lighted environment and compared responses to stimulus movement during periods of fixation with those to motion caused by saccadic or pursuit eye movements. Neurons in the inferior pulvinar (PI), lateral pulvinar (PL), and superior colliculus were tested. 2. Cells in PI and PL respond to stimulus movement over a wide range of speeds. Some of these cells do not respond to comparable stimulus motion, or discharge only weakly, when it is generated by saccadic or pursuit eye movements. Other neurons respond equivalently to both types of motion. Cells in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus have similar properties to those in PI and PL. 3. When tested in the dark to reduce visual stimulation from the background, cells in PI and PL still do not respond to motion generated by eye movements. Some of these cells have a suppression of activity after saccadic eye movements made in total darkness. These data suggest that an extraretinal signal suppresses responses to visual stimuli during eye movements. 4. The suppression of responses to stimuli during eye movements is not an absolute effect. Images brighter than 2.0 log units above background illumination evoke responses from cells in PI and PL. The suppression appears stronger in the superior colliculus than in PI and PL. 5. These experiments demonstrate that many cells in PI and PL have a suppression of their responses to stimuli that cross their receptive fields during eye movements. These cells are probably suppressed by an extraretinal signal. Comparable effects are present in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus. These properties in PI and PL may reflect the function of the ascending tectopulvinar system.     

Visual tracking neurons in primate area MST are activated by smooth-pursuit eye movements of an "imaginary" target

Because smooth-pursuit eye movements (SPEM) can be executed only in the presence of a moving target, it has been difficult to attribute the neuronal activity observed during the execution of these eye movements to either sensory processing or to motor preparation or execution. Previously, we showed that rhesus monkeys can be trained to perform SPEM directed toward an "imaginary" target defined by visual cues confined to the periphery of the visual field. The pursuit of an "imaginary" target provides the opportunity to elicit SPEM without stimulating visual receptive fields confined to the center of the visual field. Here, we report that a subset of neurons [85 "imaginary" visual tracking (iVT)-neurons] in area MST of 3 rhesus monkeys were identically activated during pursuit of a conventional, foveal dot target and the "imaginary" target. Because iVT-neurons did not respond to the presentation of a moving "imaginary" target during fixation of a stationary dot, we are able to exclude that responses to pursuit of the "imaginary" target were artifacts of stimulation of the visual field periphery. Neurons recorded from the representation of the central parts of the visual field in neighboring area MT, usually vigorously discharging during pursuit of foveal targets, in no case responded to pursuit of the "imaginary" target. This dissociation between MT and MST neurons supports the view that pursuit responses of MT neurons are the result of target image motion, whereas those of iVT-neurons in area MST reflect an eye movement-related signal that is nonretinal in origin. iVT-neurons fell into two groups, depending on the properties of the eye movement-related signal. Whereas most of them (71%) encoded eye velocity, a minority showed responses determined by eye position, irrespective of whether eye position was changed by smooth pursuit or by saccades. Only the former group exhibited responses that led the eye movement, which is a prerequisite for a causal role in the generation of SPEM.     

Adaptive changes in smooth pursuit eye movements induced by cross-axis pursuit-vestibular interaction training in monkeys

The smooth pursuit system interacts with the vestibular system to maintain the accuracy of eye movements in space. To understand neural mechanisms of short-term modifications of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) induced by pursuit-vestibular interactions, we used a cross-axis procedure in trained monkeys. We showed earlier that pursuit training in the plane orthogonal to the rotation plane induces adaptive cross-axis VOR in complete darkness. To further study the properties of adaptive responses, we examined here the initial eye movements during tracking of a target while being rotated with a trapezoidal waveform (peak velocity 30 or 40°/s). Subjects were head-stabilized Japanese monkeys that were rewarded for accurate pursuit. Whole body rotation was applied either in the yaw or pitch plane while presenting a target moving in-phase with the chair with the same trajectory but in the orthogonal plane. Eye movements induced by equivalent chair rotation with or without the target were examined before and after training. Before training, chair rotation alone resulted only in the collinear VOR, and smooth eye movement-tracking of orthogonal target motion during rotation had a normal smooth pursuit latency (ca 100 ms). With training, the latency of orthogonal smooth tracking eye movements shortened, and the mean latency after 1 h of training was 42 ms with a mean gain, at 100 ms after stimulus onset, of 0.4. The cross-axis VOR induced by chair rotation in complete darkness had identical latencies with the orthogonal smooth tracking eye movements, but its gains were <0.2. After cross-axis pursuit training, target movement alone without chair rotation induced smooth pursuit eye movements with latencies ca 100 ms. Pursuit training alone for 1 h using the same trajectory but without chair rotation did not result in any clear change in pursuit latency (ca 100 ms) or initial eye velocity. When a new target velocity was presented during identical chair rotation after training, eye velocity was correspondingly modulated by just 80 ms after rotation onset, which was shorter than the expected latency of pursuit (ca 100 ms). These results indicate that adaptive changes were induced in the smooth pursuit system by pursuit-vestibular interaction training. We suggest that this training facilitates the response of pursuit-related neurons in the cortical smooth pursuit pathways to vestibular inputs in the orthogonal plane, thus enabling smooth eye movements to be executed with shorter latencies and larger eye velocities than in normal smooth pursuit driven only by visual feedback. Electronic Publication     

Further evidence for selective difficulty of upward eye pursuit in juvenile monkeys: effects of optokinetic stimulation, static roll tilt, and active head movements

The smooth-pursuit system moves the eyes in space accurately to track slowly moving objects of interest despite visual inputs from the moving background and/or vestibular inputs during head movements. Recently, our laboratory has shown that young primates exhibit asymmetric eye movements during vertical pursuit across a textured background; upward eye velocity gain is reduced. To further understand the nature of this asymmetry, we performed three series of experiments in young monkeys. In Experiment 1, we examined whether this asymmetry was due to an un-compensated downward optokinetic reflex induced by the textured background as it moves across the retina in the opposite direction of the pursuit eye movements. For this, we examined the monkeys’ ability to fixate a stationary spot in space during movement of the textured background and compared it with vertical pursuit across the stationary textured background. We also examined gains of optokinetic eye movements induced by downward motion of the textured background during upward pursuit. In both task conditions, gains of downward eye velocity induced by the textured background were too small to explain reduced upward eye velocity gains. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the frame of reference for low-velocity, upward pursuit was orbital or earth vertical. To test this, we first applied static tilt in the roll plane until the animals were nearly positioned on their side in order to dissociate vertical or horizontal eye movements in the orbit from those in space. Deficits were observed for upward pursuit in the orbit but not in space. In Experiment 3, we tested whether asymmetry was observed during head-free pursuit that requires coordination between eye and head movements. Asymmetry in vertical eye velocity gains was still observed during head-free pursuit although it was not observed in vertical head velocity. These results, taken together, suggest that the asymmetric eye movements during vertical pursuit are specific for upward, primarily eye pursuit in the orbit.