Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for the small exophytic renal mass.

OBJECTIVES: Nephron-sparing surgery has emerged as the treatment of choice for the incidentally detected small renal mass, especially those less than 4 cm in size. We describe our technique and experience with the laparoscopic excision of these lesions. METHODS: Between June 2001 and October 2003, 20 patients underwent nephron-sparing surgery at our institution. Twenty-one laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedures were performed. All tumors were detected incidentally by cross-sectional imaging. All patients had a solid renal mass or a complex cystic renal mass of Bosniak category III or greater. All solid tumors were exophytic and less than 4cm in diameter. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches were used. Hemostasis was achieved without hilar control in 20 of the 21 cases. RESULTS: Twenty renal units were approached transperitoneally, and 1 retroperitoneally. Mean tumor size was 2.6 cm (range, 1.2 to 4). Mean estimated blood loss was 211 mL (range, 50 to 500), and mean operative time was 165 minutes. Pathology revealed renal cell carcinoma in 14 (70%). No intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients required blood transfusions postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Carefully selected patients with small, exophytic renal masses can safely undergo laparoscopic excision. When achievable, this procedure can be a more logical alternative to ablative techniques for the minimally invasive management of such lesions.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The European experience

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically difficult but oncologically effective. The operation should be performed in centers with expertise. Hemostasis can be achieved using bipolar coagulation and fibrin glue-coated cellulose. Further studies will determine whether less invasive alternatives (focused ultrasound, cryotherapy) will meet the high standard of open (or laparoscopic) nephron-sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma.     

Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy using microwave coagulation for small renal tumors

OBJECTIVES: The outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using a microwave tissue coagulator for treatment of small renal tumors was studied.PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1999 to May 2001, eight patients with small renal tumors of less than 5.0cm in diameter (1.0-5.0cm, T1N0M0) underwent retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy. To control bleeding during the partial nephrectomy, the renal parenchyma around the tumor was coagulated using a microwave tissue coagulator with a needle of 1.5cm length. The tumor was circumscribed within the coagulated area with 8-13 punctures of the coagulation needle, and partial nephrectomy was performed using scissors and bipolar forceps.RESULTS: All eight patients successfully underwent the procedure retroperitoneoscopically. The average operative time was 295 minutes and the average blood loss was 129ml. Three patients showed urine leakage from the renal calyces, which was controlled by suturing retroperitoneoscopically. In two patients, the surgical margin was revealed to be positive for renal cell carcinoma by frozen section pathology and additional resection was performed in these individuals. The patients were discharged from the hospital with almost full convalescence on day 10 on average. Within the mean follow-up period of 10.4 months, no recurrence was found when examined with computer tomography (CT) using contrast media. As a complication, one patient experienced a decrease in function of the operated kidney caused by unknown reason.CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy using a microwave tissue coagulator is useful for treatment of small renal tumors located at the peripheral area of the kidney. Bleeding from the renal parenchymal incision site is well controlled without occlusion of the renal artery with additional use of a bipolar coagulator, when necessary. Further experience and long-term follow-up are mandatory however, to establish the usefulness of this technique.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has emerged as a viable alternative to open partial nephrectomy while minimizing patient morbidity. In this article and accompanying video we describe our current technique of LPN and review our outcomes in specific patient sub-sets. METHODS: Since September 1999 more than 500 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies have been performed by the senior author. Data were collected prospectively. All patients underwent a three-dimensional CT scan prior to the operation. Our established technique involves preoperative ureteral catheterization, laparoscopic renal ultrasonography to delineate the tumor, en bloc clamping of the renal hilar vascular pedicle, tumor excision with cold endoshears, pelvicaliceal suture repair and parenchymal closure over Surgicel bolsters with biologic hemostatic agent. Renal hypothermia was achieved laparoscopically with ice slush in selected cases with anticipated long warm ischemia time. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (1-10.3 cm), 31% of the tumors were greater than 3 cm, 5% occurred in a solitary kidney, and tumor location was central in 40% and hilar in 6% of patients. Transperitoneal approach was employed in 65% of the cases. Mean warm ischemia time was 32 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 5.5%. Pathology confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 75% of the tumors. In the initial 100 patients with a 3 years minimum follow-up, overall survival was 86% and cancer-specific survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a technically challenging procedure. Adequate prior experience with laparoscopy is necessary. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes are being confirmed currently.     

Laparoscopic application of radio frequency energy enables in situ renal tumor ablation and partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE: To our knowledge we present the initial series of renal mass in situ laparoscopic radio frequency ablation. We also discuss the indications for and results of subsequent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic radio frequency ablation was performed in 13 patients with a mean age of 59 years (range 18 to 81) and a total of 17 small enhancing renal masses. In 5 patients the tumor was subsequently excised completely, whereas in 7 it was left in situ after treatment. In 1 patient with 5 lesions only the largest lesion was excised, while the other 4 were left in situ. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 1.96 cm. (range 0.9 to 3.6). Tumors that remained in situ tended to be endophytic and located in the mid pole. Pathological analysis revealed renal cell carcinoma in 10 patients, angiomyolipoma in 2 and oncocytoma in the patient with multiple lesions. None of the 8 patients with renal cell carcinoma who had at least 6 weeks of followup (mean 9.8 months, range 1.5 to 22) had any evidence of persistent tumor enhancement on surveillance computerized tomography or any other evidence of disease progression. There was 1 focal positive margin in a patient who underwent radio frequency ablation and excision of renal cell carcinoma but the patient remained disease-free 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience with laparoscopic radio frequency ablation in situ or combined with partial nephrectomy shows that it appears to be a safe method of managing small enhancing renal masses. Radio frequency assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is reserved for easily accessible exophytic tumors, while strict surveillance is required for lesions remaining in situ after ablation. Additional followup is required to assess long-term effectiveness.     

Partial nephrectomy using microwave tissue coagulator--application for laparoscopic operation

We report our clinical findings on 12 tumors (11 patients) successfully resected by partial nephrectomy with a microwave tissue coagulator (MTC) without renal pedicle clamping, including laparoscopic operation in 4 patients. All patients presented with a renal tumor detected incidentally by ultrasonography or computed tomography. The mean size of renal tumor was 1.9 (range 0.8-3.4) cm. Pathological diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma in 9 tumors and hemorrhagic cyst in 3 tumors. Mean operative time was 249 minutes. Mean blood loss was 183 ml in cases with a laparoscopic operation, that was statistically less than 486 ml in cases with an open operation (p<0.05), and 376 ml in all cases. There was no significant change in the creatinine clearance of cases with laparoscopic operation, compared with that of cases with an open operation. There were no other serious complications postoperatively. These findings suggested that partial nephrectomy with the MTC can be safely and successfully carried out while sparing renal function. Moreover, partial nephrectomy with the MTC for a laparoscopic operation may provide these patients with more benefits.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has matured significantly over the past decade and is emerging as an oncologically sound procedure for the management of small renal tumors. Methods of tumor excision as well as parenchymal reconstruction in a hemostatically controlled field have evolved to make this procedure safer. Improved techniques to minimize warm renal ischemia are being developed. Finally, methods to prevent positive surgical margins during laparoscopic surgery are crucial to a satisfactory oncologic outcome. These important technical issues, as well as the current results of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, are discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The urologic peer-review literature related to nephron-sparing surgery was reviewed. Controversial issues with respect to the surgical approach, methods of hemostatic control, acceptable time of warm ischemia, and cooling techniques were reviewed and collated. Perioperative results from larger series of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy were evaluated. RESULTS: Open nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors < or =4 cm has cancer control equivalent to that of open radical nephrectomy. Evidence is now emerging that laparoscopic partial nephrectomy will provide similar oncologic results, although clinical follow-up is still early. Blood loss, postoperative pain, and convalescence seem to be favor the laparoscopic approach. Complication rates, primarily postoperative bleeding and urine leak, may be higher than for open nephron-sparing surgery. Methods of laparoscopic hemostatic control favor soft vascular clamping for larger tumors that are more endophytic and central. Smaller exophytic lesions may be managed without renal vascular control using a variety of coagulative and hemostatic tools. Data related to warm renal ischemia suggest that the time used for tumor excision and renal reconstruction should be 30 minutes or less. Techniques for laparoscopic renal cooling are being developed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery is a technique in evolution but with a promising outlook. The urologic peer-review literature reflects an exponential growth in interest, which suggests that this minimally invasive approach is practical and may benefit our patient population so as to allow them to return to normal healthy living more quickly.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in renal cell cancer--results and reproducibility by different surgeons in a high volume laparoscopic center

OBJECTIVES: With increasing surgical skills and novel methods of hemostasis laparoscopic Partial nephrectomy has become an attractive treatment option for selected renal tumors. We report techniques, perioperative data and oncological outcome in a single center experience with three different surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2001 and October 2004, 44 patients underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy for exophytic tumors. Median tumor size was 3 cm (1-5 cm). In 25 cases the renal artery was clamped using endoscopic bulldog clamps and tumor resection was performed with scissors or the harmonic scalpel. Hemostasis was achieved by application of FloSeal only; closure of the collecting system with Lahodny sutures was performed, if necessary. Frozen sections were obtained in all cases. RESULTS: All procedures were successful with no intraoperative complications. Mean surgical time was 210 min (115-355 min); clamping time was 21 min (7-41 min) in 25 cases. In 8 cases suturing of the collecting system was required. Margins were negative in 37 cases, in five cases secondary resection was necessary to achieve negative margin status; in two cases radical nephrectomy was performed. There were no significant differences between surgeons in terms of patient data and results. At a mean follow-up of 15 months (6-37 months) no recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using FloSeal is a feasible and safe method for treatment of small renal masses. The technique is reproducible by surgeons who are used to complex laparoscopic procedures like expected in high volume laparoscopic centers.     

da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is gaining acceptance as an alternative to open surgery for small renal tumours, although technical difficulty of intracorporeal suturing and concerns over warm ischemia time are limitations. Previous work has demonstrated that suturing with the robotic system is easier compared with laparoscopy. We believe the robot has an application and we report our initial experience in 10 patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Ten patients with small exophytic renal masses underwent intraperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy. Principles of traditional open surgery were followed and intraoperative ultrasound was used to define resection margins. The renal artery was clamped with laparoscopic bulldog clamps and indigo carmine was administered intravenously to detect entry into collecting system. Suture closure and FLOSEAL were used for hemostasis. Frozen sections were obtained in all patients. RESULTS: Seven men and three women, mean age 59 yr, underwent robotic partial nephrectomy. Mean tumour size was 2 cm. Mean console and warm ischemia time were 158 min and 21 min, respectively. The median hospital stay was 1.5 d. Pathology revealed renal cell carcinoma in eight, oncocytoma in one, and lipoma in one. All resection margins were negative. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 28 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative to open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in carefully selected patients with small renal tumours. The advantages of the robotic system must be weighed against its cost. Further studies will determine if reduction in procedure complexity warrants the expense of such technology.     

Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is an increasingly performed, minimally invasive alternative to open partial nephrectomy. We compared early postoperative outcomes in 1,800 patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy by experienced surgeons with the initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with a single renal tumor 7 cm or less. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 1,800 consecutive open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomies were collected prospectively or retrospectively in tumor registries at 3 large referral centers. Demographic, intraoperative, postoperative and followup data were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Compared to the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group of 771 patients the 1,028 undergoing open partial nephrectomy were a higher risk group with a greater percent presenting symptomatically with decreased performance status, impaired renal function and tumor in a solitary functioning kidney (p<0.0001). More tumors in the open partial nephrectomy group were more than 4 cm and centrally located and more proved to be malignant (p<0.0001 and 0.0003, respectively). Based on multivariate analysis laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with shorter operative time (p<0.0001), decreased operative blood loss (p<0.0001) and shorter hospital stay (p<0.0001). The chance of intraoperative complications was comparable in the 2 groups. However, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with longer ischemia time (p<0.0001), more postoperative complications, particularly urological (p<0.0001), and an increased number of subsequent procedures (p<0.0001). Renal functional outcomes were similar 3 months after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy with 97.9% and 99.6% of renal units retaining function, respectively. Three-year cancer specific survival for patients with a single cT1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma was 99.3% and 99.2% after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is promising. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy offered the advantages of less operative time, decreased operative blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. When applied to patients with a single renal tumor 7 cm or less, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with additional postoperative morbidity compared to open partial nephrectomy. However, equivalent functional and early oncological outcomes were achieved.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of solid renal masses without hilar clamping using a monopolar radio frequency device

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is currently recommended for most amenable solid renal tumors, especially if they are exophytic and less than 4 cm. We reviewed our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solid renal masses without clamping the renal vasculature using a monopolar device that uses radio frequency energy with low volume saline irrigation for simultaneous blunt dissection, hemostatic sealing and coagulation of the renal parenchyma (TissueLink, TissueLink Medical, Inc., Dover, New Hampshire). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to April 2003, 10 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, including 9 with solid renal masses and 1 with a complex cyst. In all cases the renal hilum was dissected and the renal vessels were isolated but none had renal vascular clamping. The TissueLink DS dissecting sealer or Floating Ball (TissueLink Medical, Inc.) was used to dissect the tumor free bluntly, while simultaneously sealing and coagulating bleeders. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 54.6 years (range 42 to 72). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.3 (range 2 to 4). Mean tumor size was 3.9 cm (range 2.1 to 8). The mass had a peripheral location in 7 cases and a central location in 3. Mean operative time was 232 minutes (range 144 to 280) and mean blood loss was 352 ml (range 20 to 1000). One patient received blood transfusion and all tumor margins were negative. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range 1 to 5) and pain medication use was minimal. One patient had a brief period of urine leakage from the lower pole calix, which was managed successfully by ureteral stenting and Foley catheter drainage of the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed without renal vascular clamping. TissueLink technology allows complete tumor resection and provides adequate parenchymal hemostasis of the tumor bed. Its scant tissue charring production does not interfere with the pathological assessment of the tumor margin status.     

Indications and contraindications for the use of laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma

Surgery remains the only treatment with a chance of cure for renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) has developed to be a standard treatment for the management of suspected renal malignancy in many centers worldwide, with oncologic efficacy equal to that of open radical nephrectomy. LRN has considerable advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative morbidity, decreased analgesic requirements, and shorter hospital stay and convalescence. Current indications for LRN include all patients with localized stage T1-2 renal tumors. LRN for stage T3 renal tumors may be technically feasible in individual situations, but cannot be considered standard treatment. Open radical nephrectomy is reserved for advanced renal tumors, according to the surgeon's judgment. Partial nephrectomy is well established and considered to be the standard management for all organ-confined tumors of 相似文献   

Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Renal Masses: Prevention,Management, and Comparison with the Open Experience

Context

The initial excitement about the laparoscopic treatment of renal masses has been tempered by concerns related to increased operative time, technical complexity, and the suitability of laparoscopic approaches to oncologic surgery.

Objective

To provide a comprehensive review of intraoperative and postoperative complications and their prevention and management during laparoscopic surgery of renal tumors.

Evidence acquisition

A literature review of the Medline and Google Scholar databases was performed, searching for renal cell carcinoma, renal mass, laparoscopy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, open radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic cryoablation, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation, complications, intra-operative, and post-operative. English-language articles published between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed.

Evidence synthesis

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), whether transperitoneal or retroperitoneal, can be performed safely. The overall complication rate is low and does not significantly differ from that of the open experience. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), in contrast, is a technically challenging procedure. Although the intermediate oncologic outcomes are comparable to those of the open experience, there are concerns related to warm ischemia time, and there is a risk of major complications such as urinary leakage and hemorrhage requiring transfusion. Laparoscopic-assisted ablative therapies (cryotherapy and radiofrequency) are being performed more commonly for the treatment of small exophytic renal lesions with a low complication rate and intermediate oncologic outcomes similar to LRN and LPN.

Conclusions

Complications associated with the laparoscopic management of renal masses vary among the different procedures and with surgeon experience. The rate of complication appears to be similar to that of open surgery.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia: renal artery perfusion

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy represents a feasible option for patients with small renal masses. We describe our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia achieved by renal artery perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2001 to March 2003 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia was performed in 15 patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cold ischemia was achieved by continuous perfusion of Ringers lactate at 4C through the renal artery, which was clamped. Tumor excision was performed in a bloodless field with biopsy taken from the tumor bed. The collecting system was repaired if needed. Renal reconstruction was performed by suturing over hemostatic bolsters. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically by our new technique. Mean operative time was 185 minutes (range 135 to 220). Mean ischemia time was 40 minutes (range 27 to 101). Estimated mean intraoperative blood loss was 160 ml (range 30 to 650). Entry to the collecting system in 6 patients was repaired intraoperatively. Additional vascular repair was done in 2 patients. There were no significant postoperative complications. Postoperative followup in 8 patients showed that the renal parenchyma was not damaged by the ischemic period. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience of incorporating cold ischemia via arterial perfusion into laparoscopic partial nephrectomy shows the feasibility and safety of the technique. We believe that this approach has the potential to make laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma safe and reliable.     

Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic approach for renal cell carcinoma is slowly evolving. We report our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and compare it to a contemporary cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent open radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1990 to 1999, 32 males and 28 females underwent 61 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for suspicious renal cell carcinoma. Clinical data from a computerized database were reviewed and compared to a contemporary group of 33 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Patients in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group had significantly reduced, estimated blood loss (172 versus 451 ml., p <0.001), hospital stay (3.4 versus 5.2 days, p <0.001), pain medication requirement (28.0 versus 78.3 mg., p <0.001) and quicker return to normal activity than patients in the open radical nephrectomy group (3.6 versus 8.1 weeks, p <0.001). The majority of laparoscopic specimens (65%) were morcellated. Operating time and cost were higher in the laparoscopic than the open nephrectomy group. Average followup was 25 months (range 3 to 73) for the laparoscopic and 27.5 months (range 7 to 90) for the open group. Renal cell carcinoma in 3 patients (8%) recurred in the laparoscopic group versus renal cell carcinoma in 3 (9%) in the open group. When stratified patients with tumors larger than 4 to 10 cm. experienced similar benefits and results as patients with tumors less than or equal to 4 cm. To date there have been no instances of trocar or intraperitoneal seeding in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, although technically demanding, is a viable alternative for managing localized renal tumors up to 10 cm. It affords patients with renal tumors an improved postoperative course with less pain and a quicker recovery while providing similar efficacy at 2-year followup for patients with T1 and T2 tumors.     

Advances in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The advantages of the laparoscopic approach in the management of kidney tumors are unequivocal and the role of laparoscopy in nephron-sparing surgery is evolving. In a selected group of patients with small exophytic renal tumors laparoscopic partial nephrectomy became an alternative to open partial nephrectomy. However, the application of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to larger, centrally located tumors or tumors in unfavorable sites is limited by the difficulty of achieving adequate, prompt collecting system closure and hemostasis with a limited warm ischemia time. The most recent developments in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are the subject of this review. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of sealant products have been used as an adjunct or principal hemostatic agent in the animal model. Their application in the clinical setting remains limited to small parenchymal bleeding; larger vessels and pelvicaliceal openings are better managed by vascular clamping and intracorporeal suturing. Vascular clamping confers warm ischemia, and attempts at renal hypothermia included cold kidney irrigation through either a ureteral stent or a renal artery cannulation, and the application of ice slush for parenchymal surface cooling. SUMMARY: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically demanding; efforts directed towards facilitating hemostasis, improving renal cooling or shortening the warm ischemia time will expand its indications further.     

Clamping of the renal artery in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an old device for a new technique

OBJECTIVE: We describe our experience with the transient clamping of the renal artery during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cancer with a double loop clamping device, inspired by the Rumel tourniquet. The silastic rubber loop is positioned around the renal artery and clinched, thus achieving arterial occlusion. METHODS: From November 2002 until July 2004, fourteen consecutive patients (mean age of 58 +/- 11.6 years) underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy using the silastic rubber clamping device, eight of them on the right side and six on the left side. Hemorrhage of the renal defect was controlled with bipolar electrocoagulation, argon beam coagulation, laparoscopic sutures, surgical and fibrin glue. RESULTS:: The mean surgical time was 198.92 +/- 39.95 min for a mean tumour size of 2.9 +/- 2.32 cm and a mean blood loss of 104.57 +/- 77.69 ml. The clamping device was easily and successfully positioned around the renal artery in 2.05 +/- 0.45 min and the mean warm ischemic time was 25.21 +/- 6.07 min. CONCLUSIONS: The clamping device procures successful atraumatic occlusion of the renal artery during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without the need for an additional port. As such, it could be considered as an alternative for the laparoscopic bulldog and Satinsky clamp.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar vascular clamping using a saline-cooled, high-density monopolar radiofrequency device

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nephron-sparing surgery is now accepted as an alternative treatment option for small renal tumors. However, hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be technically challenging, especially without hilar vascular clamping. The aim of our study was to evaluate the technique of hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the TissueLink (TissueLink Medical, Dover, NH), a saline-cooled monopolar radiofrequency device, without hilar vascular clamping. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach, the kidney is mobilized transperitoneally, and the renal tumor with overlying perinephric fat is exposed. The tumor is excised with a 1-cm margin using a combination of the TissueLink device and endoscopic scissors. The tumor and a biopsy of the base of the tumor bed are sent for frozen-section examination. The bleeding vessels are controlled with digital compression and the TissueLink device. At the end of procedure, the tumor bed is covered with a hemostatic agent. Three female and four male patients ages 52 to 76 years (mean 66 years) were treated with this new device for incidental tumors detected during imaging studies (N = 6) or during work-up for gross hematuria (N = 1). Preoperative imaging studies included CT in six patients and MRI in three. The average tumor size was 2.2 cm (range 1.3-3 cm). Only peripheral tumors that did not approach the hilum or the collecting system were selected. RESULTS: All of the patients underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the TissueLink device without hilar vascular clamping. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 175 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 186 mL (range 100-300 mL). Histologic examination demonstrated renal-cell carcinoma in five cases, oncocytoma in one, and an angiomyolipoma in one. The dimensions of the normal tissue around the tumor ranged from 1 to 4 mm, and frozen-section analysis showed tumor-free margins in all cases. Postoperatively, all patients recovered well except one patient who developed transient atrial fibrillation, which was treated medically in the immediate postoperative period. All patients were discharged in good condition at an average of 3 days (range 2-6 days). CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without vascular clamping using the TissueLink device is a safe and feasible technique for exclusion of small exophytic renal tissues.     

Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: our initial experience and review of the literature

PURPOSE: We report our initial experiences of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2002 to October 2003, we performed 11 retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Our indication was T1N0M0 renal tumors which sizes were about 4 cm or less and were exophytic and were not situated at the renal hilum. First we inserted single J catheter to the renal pelvis cystoscopically. under fluoroscopic guidance. Next 4 trocars were set at pneumoretroperitoneum and the renal artery and vein were clamped individually after cold saline was circulated from the single J catheter. Renal parenchyma was sharply cut with scissors and vessels were coagulated with bipolar coagulator. When renal collecting system was opened, cariceal suture repair was performed. We used the microwave tissue coagulator without clamping the renal pedicle when the tumor was 2 cm or less in diameter and the distance from the tumor edge to the renal collecting system was more than 1cm. RESULTS: In 9 cases renal pedicles were clamped and in 2 cases were not. Mean tumor size was 27.5 +/- 8.9 mm and mean operative time was 350 +/- 92 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 743 +/- 998 ml, and mean warm ischemic time was 70 +/- 30 minutes. In one case bleeding from cut surface was uncontrollable, so open conversion was needed. In this case the renal artery and vein were clamed but another artery exited. The surgical margins were all negative, and no other complications were happened. Post operative serum creatinine raised soon after the operation but finally downed, and the mean up level was 0.07 ng/ml only. But RI examination revealed the residual renal damages were in proportioned to the warm ischemic times. During a mean followup of 8 months no patients has had local recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is effective for select patients. But better cooling method and earlier suture technique and more long follow-up periods will be necessary for establishment.     

Predictors of benign histology in clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma tumors undergoing partial nephrectomy

The anatomical characteristics of renal tumors have been classified using several systems. An association between tumor anatomical characteristics and postoperative histological diagnosis can be expected. The present study aimed to assess the rate of and predictive factors for benign histological findings for renal tumors diagnosed as T1a by preoperative imaging. From January 2000 through December 2010, 149 patients underwent partial nephrectomy (either open or laparoscopic) for T1a renal cell carcinoma. The frequency of benign histological findings was evaluated. Logistic regression analysis estimated the relative importance of predictive factors. The overall frequency of benign lesions was 8.1%. Multivariate analysis identified three statistically significant predictive factors for benign lesions: age, sex and exophytic tumor property (P = 0.0356, 0.0183 and 0.0330, respectively). The present findings suggest that exophytic tumors on preoperative imaging are more likely to be benign at histology after partial nephrectomy.