共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Motosugi U Ichikawa T Amemiya F Sou H Sano K Muhi A Enomoto N Araki T 《Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI》2012,35(3):607-610
Purpose:
To evaluate individual differences in liver stiffness measurement using both MR elastography (MRE) and ultrasound transient elastography (UTE) in patients with chronic liver disease.Materials and Methods:
This study included 80 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent both UTE and MRE. MRE and UTE were performed using a pneumatic driver (60 Hz) and an ultrasound probe with a vibrator (50 Hz), respectively. Liver stiffness data measured using the two techniques (μUTE and μMRE) were compared with respect to shear modulus. The patients were subdivided into four quartiles on the basis of average of the μUTE and μMRE values for each patient.Results:
The analysis of the 4 quartile groups revealed that μUTE was significantly higher than μMRE in the two most stiff liver groups: μUTE versus μMRE, 7.5 (1.2) versus 6.0 (0.72) kPa for the group with [μUTE + μMRE]/2 of 5.6–8.0 kPa; 15.1(4.2) versus 6.7 (1.4) kPa for the group with >8.0 kPa. However, in the least stiff liver group (i.e., the group with [μUTE + μMRE]/2 < 3.2 kPa), μUTE was significantly lower than μMRE.Conclusion:
The shear modulus measured by UTE and MRE are not equivalent, especially in patients with stiff livers. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:607‐610. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 相似文献3.
4.
5.
6.
Detection of liver fibrosis using qualitative and quantitative MR elastography compared to liver surface nodularity measurement,gadoxetic acid uptake,and serum markers 下载免费PDF全文
Cecilia Besa MD Mathilde Wagner MD PhD Grace Lo MD Sonja Gordic MD Manjil Chatterji MD Paul Kennedy PhD Ashley Stueck MD Swan Thung MD James Babb PhD Andrew Smith MD Bachir Taouli MD 《Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI》2018,47(6):1552-1561
7.
Rustogi R Horowitz J Harmath C Wang Y Chalian H Ganger DR Chen ZE Bolster BD Shah S Miller FH 《Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI》2012,35(6):1356-1364
Purpose:
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging elastography (MRE) and anatomic MRI features in the diagnosis of severe hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.Materials and Methods:
Three readers independently assessed presence of morphological changes associated with hepatic fibrosis in 72 patients with liver biopsy including: caudate to right lobe ratios, nodularity, portal venous hypertension (PVH) stigmata, posterior hepatic notch, expanded gallbladder fossa, and right hepatic vein caliber. Three readers measured shear stiffness values using quantitative shear stiffness maps (elastograms). Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of stiffness values and each morphological feature were calculated. Interreader agreement was summarized using weighted kappa statistics. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess interreader reproducibility of stiffness measurements. Binary logistic regression was used to assess interreader variability for dichotomized stiffness values and each morphological feature.Results:
Using 5.9 kPa as a cutoff for differentiating F3‐F4 from F0‐2 stages, overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for MRE were 85.4%, 88.4%, and 87%, respectively. Overall interreader agreement for stiffness values was substantial, with an insignificant difference (P = 0.74) in the frequency of differentiating F3‐4 from F0‐2 fibrosis. Only hepatic nodularity and PVH stigmata showed moderately high overall accuracy of 69.4% and 72.2%. Interreader agreement was substantial only for PVH stigmata, moderate for C/R m, deep notch, and expanded gallbladder fossa. Only posterior hepatic notch (P = 0.82) showed no significant difference in reader rating.Conclusion:
MRE is a noninvasive, accurate, and reproducible technique compared with conventional features of detecting severe hepatic fibrosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:1356–1364. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 相似文献8.
D.A. Herzka M.S. Kotys R. Sinkus R.I. Pettigrew A.M. Gharib 《Magnetic resonance in medicine》2009,62(2):284-291
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) using mechanical stimulation has demonstrated diagnostic value and clinical promise in breast, liver, and kidney at 1.5 Tesla (T). However, MRE at 1.5T suffers from long imaging times and would benefit from greater signal‐to‐noise for more robust postprocessing. We present an MRE sequence modified for liver imaging at 3.0T. To avoid artifacts in the phase images, the sequence maintains a short TE by using a second harmonic approach, including stronger motion encoding gradients, shorter radio frequency pulses and an echo‐planar readout. Scan time was decreased by a factor of ~2 relative to 1.5T by using an EPI readout and a higher density sampling of the phase waveform was used to calculate shear stiffness and viscosity. Localized (small region of interest) and global (whole‐liver region of interest) measurements in normal healthy subjects compared very favorably with previously published results at 1.5T. There was no significant difference between global and localized measures. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. 相似文献
9.
Temel K. Yasar Thomas J. Royston Richard L. Magin 《Magnetic resonance in medicine》2013,70(2):479-489
The growing clinical use of MR elastography requires the development of new quantitative standards for measuring tissue stiffness. Here, we examine a soft tissue mimicking phantom material (Ecoflex) over a wide frequency range (200 Hz to 7.75 kHz). The recorded data are fit to a cohort of viscoelastic models of varying complexity (integer and fractional order). This was accomplished using multiple sample sizes by employing geometric focusing of the shear wave front to compensate for the changes in wavelength and attenuation over this broad range of frequencies. The simple axisymmetric geometry and shear wave front of this experiment allows us to calculate the frequency‐dependent complex‐valued shear modulus of the material. The data were fit to several common models of linear viscoelasticity, including those with fractional derivative operators, and we identified the best possible matches over both a limited frequency band (often used in clinical studies) and over the entire frequency span considered. In addition to demonstrating the superior capability of the fractional order viscoelastic models, this study highlights the advantages of measuring the complex‐valued shear modulus over as wide a range of frequencies as possible. Magn Reson Med 70:479–489, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Measuring age‐dependent myocardial stiffness across the cardiac cycle using MR elastography: A reproducibility study 下载免费PDF全文
Peter A. Wassenaar Chethanya N. Eleswarpu Samuel A. Schroeder Xiaokui Mo Brian D. Raterman Richard D. White Arunark Kolipaka 《Magnetic resonance in medicine》2016,75(4):1586-1593
15.
16.
17.
18.
Hepatitis activity should be considered a confounder of liver stiffness measured with MR elastography 下载免费PDF全文
Shintaro Ichikawa MD Utaroh Motosugi MD PhD Tadao Nakazawa MD PhD Hiroyuki Morisaka PhD Katsuhiro Sano MD PhD Tomoaki Ichikawa MD PhD Nobuyuki Enomoto MD PhD Masanori Matsuda MD PhD Hideki Fujii MD PhD Hiroshi Onishi MD PhD 《Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI》2015,41(5):1203-1208
19.
MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: Reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement 下载免费PDF全文
Ye ji Lee MD Jeong Min Lee MD Jeong Eun Lee MD Kyung Bun Lee MD Eun Sun Lee MD Jeong‐Hee Yoon MD Mi Hye Yu MD Jee Hyun Baek MD Cheong Il Shin MD Joon Koo Han MD Byung Ihn Choi MD 《Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI》2014,39(2):326-331
20.
Assessment of advanced hepatic MR elastography methods for susceptibility artifact suppression in clinical patients 下载免费PDF全文
Jin Wang MD Kevin J. Glaser PhD Tianhui Zhang MS Qungang Shan MS Bingjun He BS Jun Chen PhD Meng Yin PhD Bogdan Dzyubak PhD Jennifer L. Kugel PhD Scott A. Kruse PhD Roger C. Grimm PhD Sudhakar K. Venkatesh MD Richard L. Ehman MD 《Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI》2018,47(4):976-987