共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Jorge Guridi MD Maria C. Rodriguez‐Oroz MD Javier Arbizu MD Manuel Alegre MD Elena Prieto MD Ignacio Landecho MD Miguel Manrique Julio Artieda MD Jose A. Obeso MD 《Movement disorders》2008,23(13):1808-1811
We report a patient with severe orthostatic tremor (OT) unresponsive to pharmacological treatments that was successfully controlled with thalamic (Vim, ventralis intermedius nucleus) deep brain stimulation (DBS) over a 4‐year period. Cortical activity associated with the OT revealed by EEG back‐averaging and fluoro‐deoxi‐glucose PET were also suppressed in parallel with tremor arrest. This case suggests that Vim‐DBS may be a useful therapeutic approach for patients highly disabled by OT. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society 相似文献
2.
Laila Terzic Angela Voegtle Amr Farahat Nanna Hartong Imke Galazky Slawomir J. Nasuto Adriano de Oliveira Andrade Robert T. Knight Richard B. Ivry Jürgen Voges Lars Buentjen Catherine M. SweeneyReed 《Human brain mapping》2022,43(15):4791
The network of brain structures engaged in motor sequence learning comprises the same structures as those involved in tremor, including basal ganglia, cerebellum, thalamus, and motor cortex. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) reduces tremor, but the effects on motor sequence learning are unknown. We investigated whether VIM stimulation has an impact on motor sequence learning and hypothesized that stimulation effects depend on the laterality of electrode location. Twenty patients (age: 38–81 years; 12 female) with VIM electrodes implanted to treat essential tremor (ET) successfully performed a serial reaction time task, varying whether the stimuli followed a repeating pattern or were selected at random, during which VIM‐DBS was either on or off. Analyses of variance were applied to evaluate motor sequence learning performance according to reaction times (RTs) and accuracy. An interaction was observed between whether the sequence was repeated or random and whether VIM‐DBS was on or off (F[1,18] = 7.89, p = .012). Motor sequence learning, reflected by reduced RTs for repeated sequences, was greater with DBS on than off (T[19] = 2.34, p = .031). Stimulation location correlated with the degree of motor learning, with greater motor learning when stimulation targeted the lateral VIM (n = 23, ρ = 0.46; p = .027). These results demonstrate the beneficial effects of VIM‐DBS on motor sequence learning in ET patients, particularly with lateral VIM electrode location, and provide evidence for a role for the VIM in motor sequence learning. 相似文献
3.
4.
Masami Nishio Kojiro Korematsu Susumu Yoshioka Yasuyuki Nagai Tomoyuki Maruo Yukitaka Ushio Ryuji Kaji Satoshi Goto 《Journal of clinical neuroscience》2009,16(11):1489-1491
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) is a powerful surgical option in the treatment of tremor-predominant Parkinson’s disease. However, its therapeutic efficacy depends on the tremor distribution. DBS is highly efficient in relief of distal appendicular tremor but not other types of tremor. Also, it is generally thought that DBS of the VIM has no significant beneficial effects on other motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. We report two hemiparkinsonian patients, in whom unilateral VIM DBS combined with posteroventral pallidotomy produced long-lasting suppression of not only hand tremor, but also leg or jaw tremor and other motor symptoms. 相似文献
5.
Harrison C. Walker MD He Huang MS Christopher L. Gonzalez MS James E. Bryant Jeffrey Killen MS Robert C. Knowlton MD Erwin B. Montgomery Jr. MD Gary C. Cutter PhD Abidin Yildirim PhD Bart L. Guthrie MD Ray L. Watts MD 《Movement disorders》2012,27(11):1404-1412
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) relieves disabling symptoms of neurologic and psychiatric diseases when medical treatments fail, yet its therapeutic mechanism is unknown. We hypothesized that ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus stimulation for essential tremor activates the cortex at short latencies, and that this potential is related to the suppression of tremor in the contralateral arm. We measured cortical activity with electroencephalography in 5 subjects (seven brain hemispheres) across a range of stimulator settings, and reversal of the anode and cathode electrode contacts minimized the stimulus artifact, allowing visualization of brain activity. Regression quantified the relationship between stimulation parameters and both the peak of the short latency potential and tremor suppression. Stimulation generated a polyphasic event‐related potential in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex, with peaks at discrete latencies beginning less than 1 ms after stimulus onset (mean latencies 0.9 ± 0.2, 5.6 ± 0.7, and 13.9 ± 1.4 ms, denoted R1, R2, and R3, respectively). R1 showed more fixed timing than the subsequent peaks in the response (P < 0.0001, Levene's test), and R1 amplitude and frequency were both closely associated with tremor suppression (P < 0.0001, respectively). These findings demonstrate that effective VIM thalamic stimulation for essential tremor activates the cerebral cortex at approximately 1 ms after the stimulus pulse. The association between this short latency potential and tremor suppression suggests that DBS may improve tremor by synchronizing the precise timing of discharges in nearby axons and, by extension, the distributed motor network to the stimulation frequency or one of its subharmonics. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society 相似文献
6.
7.
《Clinical neurophysiology》2020,131(1):167-176
ObjectiveEssential tremor (ET) prominently affects the upper-limbs during voluntary movements, but can also affect the lower-limbs, head, and chin. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of thalamus improves both clinical ratings and quantitative measures of tremor, no study has quantified effects of DBS on tremor across multiple body parts. Our objective was to quantify therapeutic effects of DBS across multiple body parts in ET.MethodsWe performed quantitative assessment of tremor in ET patients who had DBS for at least one year. We assessed tremor on and off VIM-stimulation using triaxial accelerometers on the upper-limbs, lower-limbs, head and chin during seated and standing tasks.ResultsVIM-DBS significantly reduced tremor, but there was no statistical difference in degree of tremor reduction across the measured effectors. Compared to healthy controls, ET patients treated with DBS showed significantly greater tremor power (4–8 Hz) across all effectors during seated and standing tasks.ConclusionsVIM-DBS reduced tremor in ET patients. There was no significant difference in the degree of tremor reduction across the measured effectors.SignificanceThis study provides new quantitative evidence that VIM-DBS is effective at reducing tremor across multiple parts of the body. 相似文献
8.
9.
Liu Yuan Shaohui Zhang Shuangshuang Liang Na Liu Xiaoman Yu Shuli Liang 《Epileptic Disord》2019,21(4):379-384
We report the first patient to die from refractory convulsive status epilepticus (SE) after the removal of a stimulator. The removal occurred after a two-year period of successful control of super-refractory convulsive SE with deep brain stimulation of the bilateral anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS). The female patient, born in 1990, suffered from high fever and seizures, and was diagnosed with viral encephalitis in 2005. After four weeks of medical treatment, she recovered with no neurological disabilities, but suffered from monthly seizures. Ten years later, the patient presented with convulsive SE, while four months pregnant in February of 2015. Her SE remained super-refractory to drugs despite the termination of pregnancy. Therefore, ANT-DBS was performed in March of 2015. The patient became SE-free following activation of an ANT-DBS stimulator. However, the stimulation treatment was terminated according to the family's request when a tremor developed two years after the treatment had begun. Subsequently, four SE episodes occurred and the tremor did not improve. The stimulator and electrodes were removed in August of 2017. The patient died of an uncontrolled SE two months later. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of ANT-DBS for emergency super-refractory convulsive SE with both positive and negative outcomes. 相似文献
10.
Peter Hedera Fenna T. Phibbs Rachel Dolhun P. David Charles Peter E. Konrad Joseph S. Neimat Thomas L. Davis 《Parkinsonism & related disorders》2013,19(7):684-686
Dystonic tremor (DT) is characterized by coexisting tremor and abnormal dystonic posturing in the same segment. DT is often medically refractory and DBS is an important therapeutic option. However, the optimal surgical target for DT remains uncertain with Vim, GPi and zona incerta previously reported as effective. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome data from all patients with DT involving at least one upper extremity who underwent DBS at Vanderbilt University from July 2006 to July 2010. We evaluated the improvement of tremor and dystonia after their response to DBS was judged to be maximal. Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Vim was targeted in four patients and three had unilateral procedure and one bilateral Vim DBS. GPi was targeted in four patients with bilateral DBS procedure in every patient from this subgroup. A combined bilateral GPi and unilateral Vim DBS was performed in two patients. The best results for tremor control were observed in patients with Vim DBS but they had persisting mild dystonia. Patients with GPi DBS had average DT improvement by approximately 50% but their dystonia symptoms were markedly improved. We propose that the patients with DT with a mild dystonia should be considered for Vim DBS procedure and the coexistence of severe DT and dystonia may be successfully controlled by combined GPi and Vim DBS surgeries. 相似文献
11.
Norbert Kovacs MD Endre Pal MD PhD Hajnalka Merkli MD Lorant Kellenyi AES Ferenc Nagy MD PhD Jozsef Janszky MD PhD Istvan Balas MD PhD 《Movement disorders》2008,23(2):276-279
A recent study has proved that unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus has bilateral effects. However, it is still unclear whether unilateral ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim) DBS exerts exclusively contralateral or bilateral effects on tremor. Previous studies demonstrated a clinically irrelevant improvement on the nontarget side after thalamic stimulator implantation, which was considered to be solely the result of mechanical effects. We report here the case of a 55‐year‐old woman in whom unilateral thalamic DBS can stop the disabling postural‐kinetic tremor in both hands. Simultaneous surface electromyography (sEMG), accelerometry, and video recordings were obtained to evaluate the underlying mechanism. After the right Vim DBS was turned off, moderate rest tremor appeared in both hands accompanied by bilateral bursts on sEMG. Because right hand tremor cannot simply reflect the mechanical overflow of the left side, the bilateral improvement caused by right Vim DBS is probably due to an active tremor reduction in this particular case. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society 相似文献
12.
Eliana Della Flora BMedPharmBiotech GCPH Caryn L. Perera BA Grad Cert EBP Alun L. Cameron BSc PhD Guy J. Maddern FRACS PhD 《Movement disorders》2010,25(11):1550-1559
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical treatment, which has proven useful in treating Parkinson's disease. This systematic review assessed the safety and effectiveness of DBS for another movement disorder, essential tremor. All studies concerning the use of DBS in patients with essential tremor were identified through searching of electronic databases and hand searching of reference lists. Studies were categorized as before/after DBS or DBS stimulation on/off to allow the effect of the stimulation to be analyzed separately to that of the surgery itself. A total of 430 patients who had received DBS for essential tremor were identified. Most of the reported adverse events were mild and could be treated through changing the stimulation settings. Generally, in all studies, there was a significant improvement in outcomes after DBS compared with baseline scores. In addition, DBS was significantly better in testing when the stimulation was turned on, compared with stimulation turned off or baseline. Based on Level IV evidence, DBS is possibly a safe and effective therapy for essential tremor. © 2010 Movement Disorders Society 相似文献
13.
Cockayne syndrome manifests a spectrum of neurological dysfunction that includes medically intractable movement disorders. Deep brain stimulation has not been well studied in such rare neurodegenerative conditions. In this case, stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus was used to manage severe motor symptoms in a young man with Cockayne syndrome. There was a marked and progressive response to thalamic stimulation within weeks of surgery. These results suggest that patients with Cockayne syndrome should be considered for deep brain stimulation to treat refractory movement disorders. 相似文献
14.
BACKGROUND: Medical treatment is usually ineffective for Holmes' tremor, and surgery is the treatment of choice for many patients. Here we report the case of a 14-year-old girl who developed Holmes' tremor related to a thalamic abscess and was successfully treated with thalamic deep brain stimulation. CASE REPORT: The patient presented with left hemiparesis and headache and was hospitalized. Investigation revealed a thalamic abscess in the left cerebral hemisphere. The abscess was drained via stereotactic surgery and a course of antibiotic treatment was completed. Four months after treatment, the patient developed Holmes' tremor in her left upper extremity. When attempts at medical treatment with levodopa, clonazepam, and trihexyphenidyl all failed, an implant was placed and deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus was initiated. During 2.5 years of follow-up, her tremor diminished by 90%. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that medically resistant Holmes' tremor related to a thalamic lesion can be successfully treated with thalamic deep brain stimulation. 相似文献
15.
脑深部电刺激术治疗震颤 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
目的探讨脑深部电刺激术(brain deep stimulation,DBS)治疗各种震颤的疗效、术中手术靶点确定以及术后程控策略.方法采用微电极记录下丘脑腹中间核和丘脑底核电刺激术,对4例原发性震颤(essentialtremor,ET)(其中1例合并帕金森病患者靶点选择丘脑底核)和1例窒息后震颤症患者进行治疗.结果4例ET患者经过2~4次调试,双侧上肢症状控制满意(改善率在75%~90%),其中1例头部震颤和发音震颤患者症状显著改善(改善率分别为82%和84%).1例缺氧后震颤患者经多次调试症状改善不明显.其中1例行双侧DBS治疗的ET患者,手术后2个月出现慢性硬膜下血肿,经手术清除后痊愈,且开启DBS后症状控制满意.5例患者均没有出现永久性并发症.结论DBS是治疗ET双侧症状的首选方法,相对于丘脑毁损术(尤其是双侧)有较高的安全性. 相似文献
16.
18.
Molly M Sturman David E Vaillancourt Leo Verhagen Metman Diane K Sierens Roy A E Bakay Daniel M Corcos 《Movement disorders》2007,22(8):1157-1163
This study examined the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus (STN), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and medication for resting tremor during performance of secondary tasks. Hand tremor was recorded using accelerometry and electromyography (EMG) from 10 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and ten matched control subjects. The PD subjects were examined off treatment, on STN DBS, on medication, and on STN DBS plus medication. In the first experiment, tremor was recorded in a quiet condition and during a cognitive task designed to enhance tremor. In the second experiment, tremor was recorded in a quiet condition and during isometric finger flexion (motor task) with the contralateral limb at 5% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) that was designed to suppress tremor. Results showed that: (1) STN DBS and medication reduced tremor during a cognitive task that exacerbated tremor, (2) STN DBS normalized tremor frequency in both the quiet and cognitive task conditions, whereas tremor amplitude was only normalized in the quiet condition, (3) a secondary motor task reduced tremor in a similar manner to STN DBS. These findings demonstrate that STN DBS still suppresses tremor in the presence of a cognitive task. Furthermore, a secondary motor task of the opposite limb suppresses tremor to levels comparable to STN DBS. 相似文献
19.
20.
The Effect of Uni‐ and Bilateral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Speech in Patients With Essential Tremor: Acoustics and Intelligibility 下载免费PDF全文
Johannes Becker MA Michael T. Barbe MD PhD Mariam Hartinger PhD Till A. Dembek MD Jil Pochmann MD Jochen Wirths MD PhD Niels Allert MD PhD Doris Mücke PhD Anne Hermes PhD Ingo G. Meister MD PhD Veerle Visser‐Vandewalle MD PhD Martine Grice PhD Lars Timmermann MD PhD 《Neuromodulation》2017,20(3):223-232