Continuous monitoring of corneal thickness changes during LASIK with online optical coherence pachymetry

PURPOSE: To assess the continuous intraoperative monitoring of central corneal thickness (CCT) changes during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using online optical coherence pachymetry (OCP). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukolln, Berlin, Germany. METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized comparative clinical case series of consecutive patients, 32 eyes having LASIK for myopia, myopic astigmatism, or hyperopia were continuously monitored intraoperatively in real time with online OCP integrated into a clinical excimer laser. The intraoperative values were compared to the postoperative flap and residual stromal thicknesses measured with corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) as well as the calculated myopic ablation depth. RESULTS: Continuous monitoring with online OCP enabled intraoperative visualization of the CCT changes during LASIK. The CCT, flap thickness after the microkeratome pass, time-resolved ablation, and residual stromal thickness were assessed. Intraoperatively, the mean flap thickness was 135 microm +/- 38 (SD) and the mean residual stromal thickness, 286 +/- 59 microm. The mean intraoperative flap and residual stromal thickness values were 43.7 microm and 15.4 microm lower, respectively, than the postoperative values assessed with corneal OCT (P<.001 and P=.005, respectively). The optically determined myopic ablation depth was 118 +/- 37 microm, which was 28 microm higher than the nominal ablation depth. There was a significant correlation (P<.001) between the postoperative flap (r=0.79) and residual (r=0.88) thickness measured with corneal OCT as well as the calculated myopic ablation depth (r=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative online OCP could be an important safety feature to monitor the flap and residual stromal thicknesses during LASIK. The individual ablation depth and possible dehydration effects were also monitored continuously.     

Intraoperative optical coherence pachymetry during laser in situ keratomileusis--first clinical experience

PURPOSE: To investigate intraoperative optical coherence pachymetry during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: In an initial clinical evaluation, three patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism were studied. Corneal thickness was assessed with optical pachymetry based on low-coherence interferometry during LASIK. RESULTS: The attempted mean spherical equivalent refraction was -5.70 +/- 2.00 D with a mean calculated stromal ablation depth of 95 +/- 18 microm. Intraoperative optical coherence pachymetry was reproducible in all patients during the different stages of LASIK, demonstrating a mean flap thickness of 141 +/- 30 microm with a residual corneal stroma of 274 +/- 24 microm at the end of the laser ablation. The immediate postoperative corneal thickness revealed marked swelling. CONCLUSIONS: This initial clinical evaluation proved that intraoperative optical coherence pachymetry may be an important safety feature for monitoring flap and residual stromal thickness during LASIK. It may be particularly helpful in the effort to avoid iatrogenic corneal ectasia in patients with thin corneas, higher refractive corrections, and LASIK enhancements.     

Errors of residual stromal thickness estimation in LASIK.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate inaccuracy and variability in residual stromal thickness estimation in LASIK by pachymetry and measurements of corneal thickness, flap thickness, and ablation depth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 73 eyes of 37 patients, preoperative and postoperative corneal thicknesses were obtained with slit-scanning elevation topography and the ultrasound pachymeter. LASIK was performed and corneal flaps were created with a microkeratome. Flap thickness and ablation depth (expected and achieved) were calculated. Residual stromal thickness estimation error was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative corneal thicknesses were 559.58 +/- 23.47 and 554.92 +/- 29.95 microm for the ultrasound pachymeter and slit-scanning elevation topography, respectively. Measurement differences ranged from -36 to 30 microm. With the pachymeter, calculated mean flap thickness was 139.58 +/- 17.59 microm. With this device, predicted ablation depth differed from achieved depth by 20% or more in approximately one-third (30.14%) of treated patients; ablation differences ranged from 10.0% to 19.99% in 37% of patients and 1.00% to 9.99% in 31.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Imprecision of microkeratome cuts, preoperative corneal pachymetry, and laser ablation depth have a significant impact on the inaccuracy of residual stromal thickness prediction. Especially in patients with borderline corneal thickness, intraoperative pachymetry measurements and a residual stromal thickness higher than the safety margin of 250 microm are recommended to minimize iatrogenic ectasia.     

Noncontact optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal flap and residual stromal bed thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: Studies show significant variability in the thickness of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) corneal flaps cut by various microkeratomes. Most studies of corneal flap thickness are based on contact ultrasonic pachymetry measurements taken during the surgical procedure. This study reports a technique to obtain reproducible corneal flap thickness and residual stromal bed thickness measurements using noncontact optical coherence tomography (OCT) following LASIK. METHODS: The corneal flap thicknesses of 26 eyes of 15 patients were measured following LASIK in which the flap was created using the Amadeus microkeratome: 160-microm head, 9.5-mm ring, 4.0-mm/s translation speed, 8000 oscillations/m, and full vacuum. Zeiss Humphrey OCT-2 line scans were performed on postoperative days 1 and 7. The raw data from three scans for each eye and day were exported to Microsoft Excel for processing, averaging, and analysis. RESULTS: The OCT corneal flap thickness and residual stromal bed thickness measurements correlated well with ultrasonic pachymetry measurements performed during surgery (R2 = .92). The OCT technique yielded reproducible results, as the variance for repeated scans was only 2.5% of the variance between eyes. In bilateral cases a single blade was used for both eyes. The mean flap thickness of 15 first eyes was significantly greater than that of the 10 second eyes: 181 +/- 31 microm vs. 143 +/- 41 microm (P < .01). A positive correlation was found between the preoperative pachymetry and corneal flap thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The OCT scan averaging technique is a reproducible, noncontact postoperative method for measuring corneal flap and residual stromal bed thicknesses following LASIK.     

Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether flap thickness changes after the primary laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure and to assess the accuracy of intraoperative pachymetry and ablation depth measurements in predicting stromal bed thickness before enhancement in eyes that have had primary myopic LASIK. SETTING: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, USA. METHODS: This retrospective noncomparative interventional case series comprised 57 eyes of 42 patients who had LASIK enhancement between June 2001 and September 2002. Exclusion criteria included previous ocular surgery or complications during the first LASIK procedure. Only patients who had had LASIK and enhancement by the same surgeon at our institution and had intraoperative pachymetry readings for both procedures were included. The original flap was relifted in all enhancement procedures. Corneal thickness was routinely measured intraoperatively by ultrasound pachymetry. The age, eye, refraction, date of primary LASIK, central corneal thickness (CCT) and central stromal bed thickness at primary LASIK, depth of ablation, flap thickness (subtraction pachymetry), date of enhancement, CCT and central stromal bed thickness at enhancement, and flap thickness at enhancement were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes of 26 patients were myopic and 26 eyes of 16 patients were hyperopic before primary LASIK. The mean time between LASIK and enhancement was 218 days +/- 115 (SD) (193 +/- 88 days in myopic eyes and 248 +/- 136 days in hyperopic eyes [P = .068]). The flap tended to be thicker at enhancement than in the primary LASIK procedure by 9.3 +/- 25.7 microm in myopic eyes (P = .054) and 10.5 +/- 16.6 microm in hyperopic eyes (P = .004). A strong correlation was found between flap thickness in the first and second procedures in myopic and hyperopic eyes (r = 0.6). In myopic eyes, the mean difference between the estimated stromal bed thickness after the first procedure (central bed thickness- ablation depth) and the stromal bed thickness measured directly at enhancement was not statistically significant (3 +/- 29 microm; P = .54, paired t test). A strong correlation was found between the 2 measurements (r = 0.8, P<.001). Another strong correlation was found in myopic eyes between the estimated corneal thickness after the primary LASIK and the corneal thickness measured at enhancement (r = 0.81, P<.001). No correlation was found between the difference in flap thickness and the time to enhancement (r = 0.09 in myopic eyes and r = 0.01 in hyperopic eyes). CONCLUSIONS: Flap thickness tended to be thicker at enhancement than at primary LASIK. Intraoperative pachymetry and ablation depth measurements proved to be precise tools to predict stromal bed thickness before enhancement in eyes that had had primary myopic LASIK. This information may help in planning LASIK enhancements.     

Probability model of the inaccuracy of residual stromal thickness prediction to reduce the risk of ectasia after LASIK part I: quantifying individual risk

PURPOSE: To measure the imprecision of microkeratome cuts, preoperative corneal pachymetry, and laser ablation depth and develop a statistical model to describe the probability of the residual stromal bed thickness (RST) after myopic LASIK being significantly thinner than predicted. METHODS: Preoperative corneal thickness, flap thickness, ablation depth, and RST were measured in 36 eyes by a prototype three-dimensional very high-frequency (VHF) 50 MHz digital ultrasound scanning device (<1.2 microm precision), precursor to the commercially available Artemis 2. All eyes had undergone LASIK with the Moria LSK-One microkeratome and the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. Based on the statistically combined uncertainty (standard deviation) and bias (accuracy to intended value) of corneal thickness measurement, flap thickness, and ablation depth, a continuous probability function was devised describing the chance of obtaining an actual RST less than a specified "cut-off". The model was applied using the data collected from the cohort of eyes. The model was also applied using published flap thickness statistics on a series of microkeratomes. RESULTS: Precision (standard deviation) was 0.74 microm for VHF digital ultrasound measurement of pachymetry, 30.3 microm for Moria LSK-One flap thickness, and 11.2 microm for NIDEK EC-5000 ablation depth. Assuming negligible laser ablation depth bias, the model found the probability that the actual RST will be <200 pmicromgiven a target RST of 250 microm is 7.56% with the Moria LSK-One. The model applied to published flap statistics revealed a range of probabilities of leaving <200 microm given a target RST of 250 microm from <0.01% to 33.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of microkeratome, laser, and pachymeter has a significant impact on the variation of the depth of keratectomy and thus on the risk of ectasia. This model together with high-precision microkeratomes, preoperative pachymetry, and knowledge of laser ablation precision would enable surgeons to determine the specific imprecision of RST prediction for individual LASIK cases and minimize the risk of ectasia.     

Comparison of residual stromal bed and flap thickness in primary and repeat laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic patients

PURPOSE: To compare the change in residual stromal thickness and flap thickness between primary laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and repeat LASIK in myopic patients. SETTING: Melbourne Excimer Laser Group, East Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: This retrospective nonrandomized comparative trial comprised 46 eyes of 34 patients who had repeat LASIK. The thickness of the residual stromal bed was calculated by subtracting the calculated stromal ablation from pachymetry of the stromal bed after cutting the flap in primary treatment and directly measuring during retreatment. The thickness of the LASIK flap in primary and repeat LASIK was calculated by subtracting the central pachymetry of the stromal bed after creating the flap from pachymetry before cutting and lifting the flap, respectively. The main outcome measures were comparison of the residual stromal bed and flap thickness between the primary treatment and the retreatment. RESULTS: The mean thickness of the calculated residual stromal bed after primary treatment was 329.8 microm +/- 40.8 (SD), and the mean measured residual stromal bed at retreatment was 317.3 +/- 42.8 microm. The mean difference in residual stromal bed thickness was 12.5 +/- 13.0 microm (P<.001). Sixteen eyes (34.7%) had a decrease in bed thickness between 11 microm and 20 microm. The mean flap thickness during primary LASIK and repeat LASIK was 145.2 +/- 17.1 microm and 169 +/- 18.3 microm, respectively. The mean interval between primary treatment and retreatment was 7.4 +/- 4.1 months. The mean change in flap thickness was 23.8 +/- 15.2 microm (P<.001). Fifteen eyes (32%) had an increase in flap thickness between 11 microm and 20 microm. There was a negative correlation between refractive error before primary treatment and the difference in flap thickness. No correlation was found between the difference in flap thickness and the interval between the primary treatment and the repeat treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative pachymetry of the stromal bed during retreatment is strongly recommended as the residual stromal bed and flap thickness changes between primary and retreatment. There is a tendency for the measured stromal bed at retreatment to be thinner than the calculated stromal bed and for the flap to be thicker than previously measured.     

Intraoperative corneal thickness measurement using optical coherence pachymetry and corneo-gage plus ultrasound pachymetry

PURPOSE: To compare the central corneal thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry (OCP) and ultrasound pachymetry in normal cornea. METHODS: Forty-eight right eyes of 48 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Central corneal thickness measurements were taken intraoperatively with the online OCP and ultrasound pachymeter before flap creation. The precision repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, and correlation of variation for each instrument was calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficient was based on Bland-Altman plot of differences between instruments. RESULTS: Mean central corneal thickness for ultrasound pachymetry and online OCP was 559.45+/-33.05 microm (range: 475.50 to 650.50 microm) and 521.19+/-28.97 microm (range: 447.50 to 606.00 microm), respectively. The precision (repeatability) was 7.86 microm and 9.47 microm, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the ultrasound pachymeter was 0.997 (95% CI, 0.993-0.998) and 0.993 (95% CI, 0.988-0.996) for the online OCP. The coefficient of variance was 0.50% and 0.66%, respectively. The mean difference between ultrasound pachymetry and online OCP was 38.26+/-9.96 microm. The limits of agreement were: upper=58.19 microm (95% CI, 53.30-63.07 microm) and lower=18.34 microm (95% CI, 13.45-23.22 microm). CONCLUSIONS: Online OCP can be used as a reliable alternative to ultrasound pachymetry as both instruments gave highly repeatable measurements of central corneal thickness. However, measurements using the OCP were consistently lower than those with the ultrasound pachymeter; therefore, the two techniques should not be used interchangeably. Further studies are needed to determine the implications of thinner central corneal thickness measured with online OCP as well as to resolve the systematic differences in measurements by these pachymetric technologies.     

High-speed optical coherence tomography for management after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To report applications of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the management of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) related problems. SETTING: Doheny Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. METHODS: Five patients referred for LASIK-related problems were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Clinical examination, ultrasound (US) pachymetry, Placido ring slit-scanning corneal topography (Orbscan II, Bausch & Lomb), and high-speed corneal OCT were performed. RESULTS: In cases of regression and keratectasia, OCT provided thickness measurements of the cornea, flap, and posterior stromal bed. Locations of tissue loss and flap interface planes were identified in a case with a recut enhancement complication. The information was used to determine whether further laser ablation was safe, confirm keratectasia, and manage complications. Optical coherence tomography measurements of central corneal thickness agreed well with US pachymetry measurements (difference 6.4 microm +/- 11.7 [SD]) (P = .026), while Orbscan significantly underestimated corneal thickness (-67.5 +/- 72.5 microm) (P = .17). CONCLUSIONS: High-speed OCT provided noncontact imaging and measurement of LASIK anatomy. It was useful in monitoring LASIK results and evaluating complications.     

Monitoring corneal structures with slitlamp-adapted optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To monitor corneal structures with slitlamp-adapted optical coherence tomography (OCT) in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vivantes Klinikum Neuk?lln, Berlin, Germany. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized, comparative clinical case series of consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism, the corneal structures were studied with slitlamp-adapted OCT at a wavelength of 1,310 nm. The central corneal thickness (CCT) and epithelial, flap, and residual stromal thicknesses were assessed preoperatively, immediately after surgery, on postoperative day 1, and then, on average, after 8, 35, and 160 days. RESULTS: Twenty-five eyes of 13 patients were included. The attempted mean spherical equivalent correction was -6.11 diopters (D) +/- 2.16 (SD) with a mean calculated stromal ablation depth of 92 +/- 24 microm. The CCT was 516 +/- 26 microm preoperatively and 453 +/- 40 microm postoperatively (P<.001). The epithelial thickness increased from 57.0 +/- 7.7 microm preoperatively to 61.0 +/- 7.5 microm postoperatively (P =.04). Imaging of the hyperreflective interface was possible in all patients for up to 15 months. The flap and residual stromal thickness was 211 +/- 28 microm and 344 +/- 48 microm, respectively, immediately after LASIK and 164 +/- 21 microm (P<.001) and 284 +/- 32 microm (P<.001), respectively, on postoperative day 1. There were no further significant changes during the follow-up. The overall mean reproducibility was +/-4.50 microm (coefficient of variation [CV] 0.94%) for CCT, +/-4.99 microm (CV 8.57%) for epithelial thickness, +/-6.25 microm (CV 3.55%) for flap thickness, and +/-7.09 microm (CV 2.42%) for residual stromal thickness. CONCLUSION: Slitlamp-adapted OCT can be used to longitudinally monitor the variable structures of the cornea, epithelium, flap, and residual stroma in LASIK.     

Online optical coherence pachymetry as a safety measure for laser in situ keratomileusis treatment in 1859 cases

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and applicability of online optical coherence pachymetry (OCP) (OCPonline, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH) integrated into the Zyoptix 217z100 excimer laser platform (Bausch & Lomb) under routine clinical conditions. SETTING: Private laser clinic, Munich, Germany. METHODS: Between July 2004 and June 2006, 1859 consecutive eyes having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Zyoptix 217z100 excimer laser platform had preoperative pachymetry with the Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb) and DGH II (Pachette 2, DGH Technology, Inc.) and continuous intraoperative online OCP with the OCPonline. Preoperative pachymetry values and actual flap thicknesses with the Hansatome and Zyoptix XP microkeratomes (both Bausch & Lomb) and the IntraLase FS30 femtosecond laser keratome (IntraLase Corp.) were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperative pachymetry values showed a high correlation between the OCPonline device and the Orbscan II (R(2) = 0.78, difference = 0.37%) and DGH II (R(2) = 0.77, difference = 0.69%). The OCPonline measurements resulted in a mean flap thickness of 121.4 microm +/- 19.1 (SD) with the Hansatome (160 microm head), 126.5 +/- 15.5 microm with the Zyoptix XP (120 microm head), and 121.7 +/- 14.7 microm with the IntraLase FS30 (110 microm flap thickness). A correlation between the calculated laser ablation depth and the measured stromal thinning was established. CONCLUSION: OCPonline technology provided reliable intraoperative noncontact pachymetry measurements integrated into a clinical flow, indicating the technology has the potential to improve the safety of corneal ablation procedures.     

Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratome

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to analyze the effect of preoperative central corneal thickness and corneal keratometric power on flap thickness. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: One hundred forty eyes with a mean preoperative pachymetry of 554.4 microm +/- 36.3 (SD) and a mean keratometry of 43.5 +/- 1.9 diopters had LASIK using the Hansatome automated microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and a 193 nm argon-fluoride excimer laser (Summit SVS Apex Plus). The 180 microm microkeratome plate was used in all procedures. Corneal thickness was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter (Advent, Mentor O&O Inc.) before and during the flap procedure, and the difference was taken as flap thickness. The data were analyzed using a 1-tailed t test and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean flap thickness was 120. 8 +/- 26.3 microm. There was a low correlation between baseline central corneal thickness and corneal flap thickness (P =.6, r = 0. 046). There was no correlation between preoperative keratometry and flap thickness (P =.01, r = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: The Hansatome microkeratome does not always produce a corneal flap of the intended thickness. Factors other than keratometry and pachymetry must affect flap thickness.     

Corneal flap measurements in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 automated microkeratome

PURPOSE: To evaluate accuracy and predictability and factors that influence the dimensions of the laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) corneal flap created with the Moria M2 automated microkeratome (Moria SA, Antony, France). METHODS: The flap thickness of 454 eyes of 243 consecutive patients was measured using subtraction ultrasonic pachymetry during LASIK with the Moria M2 microkeratome head 130 designed to create a 160-microm-thick flap. Flap dimensions were evaluated and measurements were correlated with preoperative parameters. A stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced actual flap thickness. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of the 454 eyes ranged from -12.125 diopters (D) to +6.25 D. Patient age ranged from 18 to 57 years (mean age: 31.3 +/- 8.8 years). Mean preoperative keratometric power K1 was 44.31 +/- 1.59 D and K2 was 43.32 +/- 1.54 D. Mean preoperative central comeal thickness was 552.4 +/- 32.5 microm (range: 466 to 665 microm). With an attempted thickness of 160 microm, the Moria M2 flap thickness ranged from 77 to 209 microm (mean: 153.3 +/- 19.0 microm). Mean horizontal flap diameter was 9.2 +/- 0.2 mm and mean hinge length 4.6 +/- 0.3 mm. Increasing flap thickness was found to correlate with increasing preoperative comeal thickness, younger patient age, and flatter preoperative keratometric power K1. CONCLUSIONS: Although the standard deviation of the flap thickness was relatively small, remarkable individual variation was noted. Therefore, the intraoperative calculation of the remaining stromal bed is recommended. Furthermore, the consideration of central corneal thickness, patient age, and preoperative keratometry are helpful parameters to avoid too deep ablation.     

Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 microkeratome

PURPOSE: To determine the predictability of flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Moria M2 microkeratome and identify factors that may be related to variations in flap thickness. SETTING: Laser Vision Correction Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA. METHODS: Charts of 208 patients having same-day bilateral LASIK using the Moria M2 microkeratome were reviewed. Intraoperative pachymetry was performed routinely. The right eye was always treated first. The same suction ring, stop, microkeratome head (110 microm or 130 microm), and blade were used in fellow eyes. Subtraction pachymetry was used to calculate flap thickness. Other collected data included age, keratometry, corneal diameter, and preoperative spherical equivalent (SE). RESULTS: With the 110 microm head and slow translation velocity in both eyes, the mean flap thickness was 151.6 microm +/- 24.0 (SD) and 148.5 +/- 24.3 microm in the right and left eyes, respectively. With the 110 microm head and fast translation velocity in both eyes, the mean thickness was 136.2 +/- 25.5 microm and 132.8 +/- 23.5 microm, respectively. With the 130 microm head and fast translation velocity, the mean flap thickness was 145.8 +/- 25.4 microm and 139.9 +/- 25.5 microm, respectively. Flaps were thinner with fast translation velocity, the 110 microm head, and presumably duller blades used in the left eyes. There was a weak but statistically significant inverse correlation between flap thickness and age and between flap thickness and SE. A stronger correlation was found in flap thickness between right and left eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Flap thickness with the Moria M2 microkeratome was variable. Fast translation velocity, a used (presumably duller) blade, and the 110 microm head produced thinner flaps. Given the potential variation in flap thickness (SD 23.5 to 25.5 microm), intraoperative pachymetry might be an adjunctive measure to prevent residual stromal beds that are thinner than planned, especially in patients with high myopia and/or thin corneas.     

Factors predictive of LASIK flap thickness with the Hansatome zero compression microkeratome

PURPOSE: To determine the explanatory power of preoperative variables and comeal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Hansatome zero compression microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional case study was performed on 250 eyes of 129 consecutive patients who underwent LASIK surgery using the Hansatome zero compression microkeratome. A 160-microm or 180-microm microkeratome head and an 8.5- or 9.5-mm suction ring were used in the procedures. Preoperative measurements included refraction, spherical equivalent, keratometry, intraocular pressure, corneal white-to-white, anterior chamber depth, and corneal eccentricity. Corneal thickness was measured intraoperatively using ultrasonic pachymetry before and after flap creation, and the difference was taken as flap thickness. Flap diameter was measured with a corneal gauge. Data were analyzed using simple, multiple, stepwise linear and non-linear regression analyses and two-tailed t tests. RESULTS: The mean flap thickness was 124 +/- 17 microm with the nominal 160-microm head and 142 +/- 20 microm with the nominal 180-microm head. One third (33%) of the total variation in flap thickness could be accounted for by three preoperative variables: average corneal thickness, spherical equivalent refraction, and choice of 160- or 180-microm microkeratome head. A simple correlation of 0.114 was noted between corneal eccentricity and flap thickness, but this variable did not add significant explanatory power on multiple regression analysis. Linear regression analysis allowed determination of a flap thickness nomogram with a standard error of the estimate of 16.9 microm and a 95% confidence interval of +/- 33.1. CONCLUSIONS: Comeal thickness is the most systematic predictor of corneal flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome. Because three preoperative variables account for only 33% of the range in flap thickness, future studies should focus on variations in blade extension and corneal biomechanical factors, which may also play an important role in determining flap thickness.     

Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes

PURPOSE: To determine the factor(s) that influence the dimensions and predictability of the LASIK corneal flap with the Automated Corneal Shaper (ACS) or the Summit Krumeich Barraquer microkeratome (SKBM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, comparative interventional case study of 4,428 eyes. Flap dimensions were measured using subtraction ultrasonic pachymetry during LASIK with one of two microkeratomes. RESULTS: Mean preoperative corneal thickness for all eyes was 555 +/- 35 microm. Corneal curvature and refractive astigmatism were inversely related to preoperative corneal thickness (P<.001). With an attempted flap thickness of 160 microm, the ACS flap thickness averaged 119.8 +/- 22.9 microm; SKBM flaps averaged 160.9 +/- 24.1 microm (P<.001). The coefficient of variation for central pachymetry compared to flap thickness was 6.4% vs. 22.1%. Flap thickness at enhancement was 10 to 17 microm thicker than at primary surgery. An increase in flap thickness was associated with thicker preoperative pachymetry (P<.001) and younger age for both instruments (P<.001) whereas increasing flap thickness was related to flatter preoperative mean keratometry for the ACS (P<.001) and steeper mean keratometry for the SKBM (P=.005). Less preoperative hyperopia or more myopia was related to an increase in flap thickness only for the SKBM (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Flap thickness varies significantly depending on the microkeratome used. Factors that influence flap thickness are primarily corneal thickness, patient age, preoperative keratometry, preoperative refraction including astigmatism, and corneal diameter. By understanding the factors that affect flap thickness, one can select a microkeratome system to allow maximum refractive correction while minimizing the risk of ectasia.     

Ultrasound evaluation of flap thickness, ablation depth, and corneal edema after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the predictability of flap thickness and changes in flap edema over time after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: LASIK was carried out in 30 eyes. The corneal flap was created with a Moria CB manual microkeratome with a flap thickness of 130 microm. Photoablation was performed with the Zeiss-Meditec MEL 70(G-Scan) flying spot excimer laser. Ultrasound pachymetric measurements were performed with the Humphrey Model 855 pachymeter. RESULTS: Preoperative mean corneal thickness was 568.43 +/- 34.6 microm. After LASIK, mean flap thickness was 133 +/- 26.4 microm. After excimer laser treatment, mean central corneal thickness decreased to a mean 392.4 +/- 37.4 microm. Five minutes after repositioning the flap, mean central corneal thickness was 572.1 +/- 43.4 microm. On the first postoperative day, it decreased to a mean 501.6 +/- 46.6 microm followed by additional decreases: mean 487.4 microm on day 5, 481.8 microm after 1 month, and 479.6 microm at 6 months. The actual photoablation depth was 10 microm less than the predicted depth (paired sample t-test, no statistically significant difference, P = .018). A significant linear correlation was found (Pearson, R =.725, P = .001) between predicted and measured photoablation depth. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal flap thickness had greater variability than expected. After flap creation, stromal and flap edema occurred, but decreased during the first five postoperative days and stabilized thereafter.     

Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To determine the factor(s) that influences measurement of residual stromal thickness (RST) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. SETTING: Clinical office-based excimer laser refractive surgery center. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative interventional case study of 6235 eyes, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry was performed immediately before and after flap creation and immediately after laser ablation in the primary procedure and after 647 enhancements. Differences in the methods for calculating RST were compared statistically. RESULTS: Using the RST measured at enhancement as the actual RST, measurements of RST immediately after laser ablation underestimated residual thickness due to laser-induced stromal dehydration and microkeratome effects (P<.001). Estimates of RST using a "standard" or estimated flap thickness were less accurate predictors of residual thickness (P<.001) than use of the theoretical laser resection with a measured flap thickness (RST-4) (P =.78) or a modified flap thickness subtracted from the postoperative corneal thickness (RST-8) (P =.98), which provided the best RST estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Before LASIK, the best means of estimating RST is to subtract the theoretical laser resection obtained from the laser computer and the expected flap thickness normally obtained with a given microkeratome system from the preoperative central corneal thickness. After LASIK, the most accurate means of calculating RST is to subtract the original flap thickness from the postoperative central corneal thickness.     

Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: flap dimensions with the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome using the 100-microm head

PURPOSE: To determine the predictability and consistency of corneal flap thickness, flap diameter, and hinge length with the modern 100 microm head of the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome. SETTING: Private clinic, office-based practice. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive eyes with no previous surgery having thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis with the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome had a new 100 microm (predicted flap thickness) head used for flap creation. Flap thickness was measured intraoperatively by subtraction ultrasound pachymetry (difference between central corneal thickness before flap cutting and residual stromal bed thickness after flap lifting). Vertical flap diameter and nasal hinge length were measured with calipers. RESULTS: Mean flap thickness was 107 microm +/- 14 (SD) (range 82 to 137 microm). Standard deviation for mean vertical flap diameter was +/-0.24 mm. The cord length of the nasal hinge was variable with a mean of 4.26 +/- 0.63 mm (range 3.12 to 5.75 mm) in length. Postoperatively, there were no slipped flaps, flap striae, diffuse lamellar keratitis, or epithelial defects; there was 1 epithelial slide. At 1 day, the visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 76% of eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The 100 microm head of the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome cut a very predictable flap thickness and diameter but with variable length hinges. This flap thickness predictability was superior to that in other series with thicker intended flaps cut with mechanical microkeratomes and is comparable to that reported with the IntraLase FS femtosecond laser. Visual recovery was rapid, epithelial risks minimal, efficiency superior, and cost nominal relative to femtosecond laser technology.     

Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To test and demonstrate measurement precision, imaging resolution, 3D thickness mapping, and clinical utility of a new prototype 3D very high-frequency (VHF) (50 MHz) digital ultrasound scanning system for corneal epithelium, flap, and residual stromal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: VHF ultrasonic 3D data was acquired by arc-motion, meridional scanning within a 10-mm zone. Digital signal processing techniques provided high-resolution B-scan imaging, and I-scan traces for high-precision pachymetry in 4 eyes. Thickness maps of individual corneal layers were constructed. Reproducibility of epithelial, flap, and full corneal pachymetry was assessed for single-point and 3D thickness mapping by repeated measures. Thickness mapping of the epithelium, stroma, flap, and full cornea were determined before and after LASIK. Preoperative to postoperative difference maps for epithelium, flap, and stroma were produced to demonstrate anatomical changes in the thickness profile of each layer. RESULTS: Surface localization precision was 0.87 microm. Central reproducibility for single-point pachymetry of epithelium was 0.61 microm; flap, 1.14 microm; and full cornea, 0.74 microm. Reproducibility for central pachymetry on 3D thickness mapping was 0.5 microm for epithelium and 1.5-microm for full cornea. B-scans and 3D thickness maps after LASIK demonstrated resolution of epithelial, stromal component of the flap, and residual stromal layers. Large epithelial profile changes were demonstrated after LASIK. Topographic variability of flap thickness and residual stromal thickness were significant. CONCLUSIONS: VHF digital ultrasound arc-B scanning provides high-resolution imaging and high-precision three-dimensional thickness mapping of corneal layers, enabling accurate anatomical evaluation of the changes induced in the cornea by LASIK.