Low morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy performed with regional anesthesia

Various anesthetic and surgical techniques have been recommended with or without cerebral function monitoring in attempts to reduce the risk of carotid endarterectomy, but there is no consensus as to the ideal method for performing this procedure. General anesthesia is now the most common anesthetic technique used, but of 337 carotid endarterectomies performed by the author's service from 1981 through 1985, 305 (91%) were conducted with regional anesthesia. This paper presents the morbidity and mortality rates for those patients. There were two perioperative transient ischemic attacks (0.66%), two perioperative strokes (0.66%), and two perioperative deaths (0.66%). No patient in the series suffered a myocardial infarction within 30 days after endarterectomy. This series demonstrates that carotid endarterectomy can be performed with good results using regional anesthesia, which facilitates intraoperative cerebral function monitoring. Regional anesthesia is associated with a very low incidence of postoperative hypertension and perioperative myocardial infarction.     

Supervised training of general surgery residents in carotid endarterectomy performed on awake patients under regional block is safe and desirable

Previous studies have documented the safety and efficacy of general surgery residents and vascular fellows performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under the supervision of an attending surgeon. With the proper supervision of the attending surgeon, these operations can be performed with an acceptably low perioperative stroke and mortality rate. The question remains, however, whether these desirable results can be obtained by general surgery residents when operating on awake patients under regional block (RB) anesthesia. We set out to determine whether it is prudent to promote this technique in this teaching setting. We analyzed 128 CEAs performed at a community teaching hospital training three chief residents a year. These operations were performed by residents under the direct supervision of a single attending vascular surgeon. RB was preferred and was used in 67 operations. General anesthesia (GA) was used in the remaining 61 procedures. Overall mortality was 0 per cent. Patients in the RB group were converted intraoperatively to GA in 4 of 67 (6%) procedures. There was one perioperative stroke in this series (1/128, 0.78%), occurring in a patient under RB (1/67, 1.5 %) leaving the patient with a minor sensory deficit. No strokes occurred in the GA group. There were five temporary cranial nerve deficits (3.9%). Three were in the RB group (4.5%) and two in the GA group (3.3%). General surgery residents can be trained in the performance of carotid endarterectomy using regional block anesthesia in awake patients without compromising patient safety. Suggestions to the effect that only attending physicians and/or vascular fellows can perform these procedures under regional block are without merit.     

The influence of anesthetic technique on perioperative complications after carotid endarterectomy

Purpose: This study evaluated the influence of anesthetic techniques on perioperative complications after carotid endarterectomy.Methods: Perioperative complications, the use of a carotid artery shunt, the duration of the operative procedure and postoperative hospital course were retrospectively compared in 584 consecutive patients undergoing 679 carotid endarterectomies with use of either general anesthesia (n = 361) or cervical block regional anesthesia (n = 318). There was no significant difference in the preoperative medical characteristics between the two anesthetic groups. Symptomatic carotid artery disease was the indication for surgery in 247 (68.4%) patients receiving general anesthetics, whereas 180 (56.6%) patients treated with a cervical block anesthetic had a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (p = 0.02).Results: The perioperative stroke rate and stroke-death rate for the entire series was 2.4% and 3.2%, respectively, and was not significantly different between the anesthetic groups or between patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic disease. A carotid artery shunt was used in 61 (19.2%) patients receiving a cervical block anesthetic and 152 (42.1%) patients treated with a general anesthetic (p < 0.0001). Use of cervical block anesthesia was associated with a significantly shorter operative time, fewer perioperative cardiopulmonary complications, and a shorter postoperative hospitalization when compared with general anesthesia. Multivariate risk factor analysis indicated that age greater than 75 years, operative time greater than 3 hours, and the use of a carotid artery shunt were all independent risk factors for perioperative cardiopulmonary complications. When a carotid artery shunt was not analyzed as a multivariate risk factor, then general anesthesia became a significant risk factor for perioperative cardiopulmonary complications (risk ratio 2.08; p = 0.04).Conclusions: We conclude that cervical block anesthesia is safer and results in a more efficient use of hospital resources than general anesthesia in the treatment of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:834-43.)     

Perioperative strokes after 1001 consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures without an electroencephalogram: incidence, mechanism, and recovery

HYPOTHESIS: That alternative methods of cerebral protection, especially routine shunting of all patients undergoing general anesthesia or shunting on the basis of neurologic assessment with the patient awake under cervical plexus block, result in outcomes of carotid endarterectomy comparable with those reported using electroencephalographic monitoring. DESIGN: Retrospective review of cases from a vascular registry established in 1990. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 1001 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Carotid endarterectomy procedures were performed without electroencephalographic monitoring, using general anesthesia with routine shunting or using regional anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall stroke and mortality rates and cause and consequence of the postoperative strokes. RESULTS: There were 14 nonfatal strokes (1.4%) and 2 deaths (0.2%), for a combined stroke and death rate of 1.6%. Nine (64%) of the 14 strokes appeared to result from a technical error during the endarterectomy. Mild deficits were noted after 7 strokes (50%), with the remainder resulting in deficits that required inpatient rehabilitation. Twelve patients with strokes (86%) eventually returned home without need for assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Most postoperative strokes in this series were due to technical errors. Overall, even in patients with strokes initially requiring inpatient rehabilitation, there was good recovery of function. Low stroke and mortality rates can be achieved in carotid endarterectomy without the use of electroencephalographic monitoring.     

The influence of anesthetic technique on perioperative blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy

The optimal anesthetic for use during carotid endarterectomy has been a matter of debate for three decades. The goal of this study is to evaluate the influence of anesthetic technique on perioperative hemodynamic instability after carotid endarterectomy. This study is a retrospective chart review and was performed in a community teaching hospital. All consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy over a 2-year period at Providence Hospital were reviewed. One hundred ninety-eight patients underwent 203 carotid endarterectomies. Two patients were excluded because of combined coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients underwent carotid endarterectomy and were divided into two groups on the basis of use of general or regional anesthesia. Blood pressure was recorded hourly for the subsequent 24 hours, and the doses of vasoactive medications received to maintain the blood pressure within 25 mm Hg of preoperative levels were recorded. Patients receiving general anesthesia were found to require significantly more sodium nitroprusside for control of hypertension compared with those receiving regional anesthesia (72.1 +/- 14.5 microg/kg vs 20.2 +/- 6.6 microg/kg; P = 0.001) in the first 8 postoperative hours. No significant differences were noted in the doses of any other vasoactive medications used. No differences were found in the subsequent 16-hour period in doses of vasoactive medications. Patients suffering myocardial infarctions were found to receive higher doses of nitroglycerine, but no differences were noted in any other vasoactive medication used based on complications. Length of stay was longer in the general anesthesia group compared with the regional anesthesia group for both the intensive care unit (1.59 +/- 0.13 days vs 1.08 +/- 0.03 days; P = 0.001) and total hospital stay (5.8 +/- 0.03 days vs 4.5 +/- 0.02 days; P = 0.003). Regional anesthesia required lower doses of antihypertensive medication in the early postoperative period when compared with general anesthesia. The doses of vasoactive medications used had no significant impact on the complication rate. Regional anesthesia allowed for shorter stay in both the intensive care unit and total hospital stay.     

Carotid endarterectomy under regional (conductive) anesthesia.

Carotid endarterectomy is reliable in the prevention of strokes due to arteriosclerotic disease at the carotid bifurcation. This is a retrospective review of 314 carotid endarterectomies performed at the University Health Center of Pittsburgh. The objectives of the study were to determine if regional anesthesia was a safe technique for carotid endarterectomy and to determine whether the neurologic complications that occurred were embolic or ischemic in origin. In patients who were neurologically intact before operation, the perioperative mortality was 0.88% and the incidence of neurologic complications was 3.1%. This is comparable to the current literature. Observations of the awake patient suggested that half the neurologic deficits that occurred in this series were due to embolization rather than to cerebral ischemia. Further more, the incidence of non-neurologic complications under general anesthesia was 12.9%. Under regional anesthesia, the incidence of non-neurologic complications was 2.8%. The data supports carotid endarterectomy under regional block as safe and reliable method.     

Clinical outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: comparison of the use of regional and general anesthetics

OBJECT: The authors analyzed their series of carotid endarterectomies (CEAs), which were performed after administration of either a general or regional anesthetic, to determine whether the choice of anesthetic affected patients' clinical outcomes and length of hospital stay. METHODS: A series of 803 consecutive CEAs performed between July 1990 and February 1999 was reviewed. Cases were analyzed for patient demographics, comorbid medical states, and perioperative complications. Contingency-table statistical analysis was used to compare the incidence of comorbid medical states and perioperative complications between patients who underwent CEA in which either a regional or general anesthetic was used. Student's t-test was used to compare the length of hospital stay and mean patient age. A regional anesthetic was used for 632 CEAs, and a general anesthetic was used for 171 operations. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in demographics or comorbid medical states. The incidence of perioperative stroke and death did not differ significantly between the regional (2.7%) and the general anesthetic groups (2.3%). However, the incidence of nonneurological, nonfatal complications was significantly less in the regional anesthetic (1.6%) than in the general anesthetic group (14.6%, p<0.0001). Patients undergoing CEA in which a regional anesthetic was used had a significantly lower incidence of cardiopulmonary complications (myocardial infarction and postoperative intubation), cervical complications (neck hematomas and cranial nerve injuries), and urological complications (urinary retention) than patients who underwent surgery after receiving a general anesthetic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CEA in which a regional anesthetic was used had significantly fewer nonneurological, nonfatal complications, particularly cardiopulmonary complications, than similar patients surgically treated after induction of general anesthesia.     

Prospective Randomized Study on Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis and Perioperative Stroke Risk in Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery: Prophylactic or Deferred Carotid Endarterectomy?

We compared the perioperative (30-day) stroke risk in asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) before or after major vascular surgery. Seventy-nine patients with asymptomatic severe carotid lesion were randomly assigned to group I (n = 40) or group II (n = 39) to receive prophylactic CEA (within 1 week before major surgery) or deferred CEA (between 30 days and 6 months after major surgery), respectively. All procedures were eversion CEAs performed under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. There were no perioperative deaths or strokes relating to the major surgical procedure in either group. All group II patients underwent deferred CEA as planned (median 47 days, range 38-94) with no subsequent perioperative deaths or strokes. Two of these patients (5.1%) suffered a minor stroke, however, 65 and 78 days after their major surgical procedure, while awaiting carotid revascularization. Although data emerging from this analysis indicate that severe asymptomatic carotid disease may be safely postponed in patients undergoing major noncarotid vascular surgery, only a multicenter prospective study could determine the most appropriate management of this subset of patients.     

Causes of the Increased Stroke Rate after Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Previous Strokes

n = 183) were compared to those who were either asymptomatic or experienced only transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) preoperatively (n= 423). Of the 183 patients who had suffered preoperative strokes, eight patients who experienced perioperative strokes after endarterectomy were compared with 175 who successfully underwent surgery. Patients with a prior stroke had an increased perioperative stroke rate (4.4% versus 1.2%, p= 0.01). They had a significantly higher incidence of hypertension (62.6% versus 47.9%, p < 0.001), cardiac disease (54.7% versus 40.7%, p= 0.001), and positive smoking history (52% versus 40.6%, p= 0.01) than did the asymptomatic/TIA patients. The presence of contralateral total occlusion was also significantly increased (22% versus 10.3%, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant due to the overall small number of patients who sustained perioperative strokes, the preoperative stroke patients who sustained perioperative strokes had a higher incidence of hypertension (87.5% versus 61.5%) and contralateral total occlusion (37.5% versus 21.3%) than did those who successfully underwent surgery. Patients with both a prior stroke and contralateral total occlusion had a 7.5% perioperative stroke rate. Patients with both a prior stroke and hypertension had a 6.1% perioperative stroke rate. The perioperative strokes in patients with prior strokes were not related to the severity of the prior stroke, the interval between the stroke and surgery, the use of a shunt, or the type of anesthesia employed. Patients who have sustained preoperative strokes have a higher incidence of significant medical illnesses and overall cerebrovascular disease. Hypertension and total occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery appear to be particularly poor prognostic indicators of outcome after endarterectomy in these patients. Patients who have sustained preoperative strokes may be more likely to display clinical neurologic symptoms in response to any form of cerebral ischemia. In this higher risk subgroup, intraoperative and surgeon-dependent factors appear to play less of a role.     

Primary closure of the carotid artery is associated with poorer outcomes during carotid endarterectomy

INTRODUCTION: Arterial endarterectomy and reconstruction during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed in a variety of ways, including standard endarterectomy with primary closure, standard endarterectomy with patch angioplasty, and eversion endarterectomy. The optimal method of arterial reconstruction remains a matter of controversy. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the method of arterial reconstruction during CEA on perioperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive CEAs performed by 81 surgeons during 1997 and 1998 in six regional hospitals was performed. Detailed clinical data regarding each case and all deaths and nonfatal strokes within 30 days of surgery were ascertained by an independent review of the inpatient chart, outpatient surgeon record, and the hospitals' administrative databases. Two physician investigators--one neurologist and one internist--confirmed each adverse event by independently reviewing patients' medical records. RESULTS: A total of 1972 CEAs were performed. The mean age of the patients was 72.3 years, and 57.2% were male. Preoperative neurologic symptoms occurred in 28.7% of cases (n = 566), and the remaining 71.3% were asymptomatic before surgery (n = 1406). The method of arterial reconstruction was chosen by the surgeon. Primary closure was performed in 11.8% (n = 233), patch angioplasty in 69.8% (n = 1377), and eversion endarterectomy in 18.4% (n = 362). There was no significant difference in the preoperative symptom status of patients who underwent primary closure compared with the other methods of reconstruction (72.5% asymptomatic vs 71.1%, p = NS). Primary closure cases were significantly more likely to experience perioperative stroke compared with the other closure techniques (5.6% vs 2.2%, P = .006). Primary closure cases also had a higher incidence of perioperative stroke or death compared with the other closure techniques (6.0% vs 2.5%, P = .006). There were no significant differences with regard to either perioperative stroke, or perioperative stroke/death noted when comparing patch angioplasty with eversion endarterectomy: stroke, 2.2% vs 2.5% (P = NS) and stroke/death, 2.5% vs 2.5% (P = NS) respectively. CONCLUSION: It appears that primary closure is associated with significantly worse perioperative outcomes compared with endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion endarterectomy, even when the preoperative symptom status of the patient cohorts is equivalent. Although some of its advocates have reported that they can properly select appropriate patients for primary closure based on the size of the artery and other factors, the data demonstrate that these patients have poorer outcomes nonetheless. Primary closure during carotid endarterectomy should predominantly be abandoned in favor of either standard endarterectomy with patch angioplasty or eversion endarterectomy.     

Causes of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy: Special considerations in symptomatic patients

In order to maximize the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the rate of perioperative stroke must be kept to a minimum. A recent analysis of carotid surgery at our institution found that most perioperative strokes were due to technical errors resulting in thrombosis or embolization. From 1992 through 1997 we have performed nearly 1200 additional CEAs; the purpose of this study was to examine recent trends in the causes of perioperative stroke, with specific attention to differences in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The records of 1041 patients undergoing 1165 CEAs were reviewed from a prospectively compiled database. Analysis of these data showed that a history of preoperative stroke appears to increase the risk of perioperative stroke after CEA. Surgical factors associated with perioperative stroke include an inability to tolerate clamping, use of an intraarterial shunt, and having surgery performed under general anesthesia; these factors are clearly interrelated and only the use of intraarterial shunting remains a risk factor by multivariate analysis. Over half of all perioperative strokes (54%) appear to be caused by intraoperative or postoperative thrombosis and embolization. The patient requiring use of intraarterial shunting and/or with a preoperative stroke most likely has a significant watershed area of brain at increased risk of infarction. However, technical errors are still the most common cause of perioperative stroke in these high-risk patients. Such high-risk patients may manifest clinical stroke from small emboli that may be tolerated by asymptomatic clamptolerant patients. Technical precision and appropriate cerebral protection are particularly critical for successful outcomes in high-risk patients. Presented at the Twenty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 10, 2000.     

The evolving surgical management of recurrent carotid stenosis.

The traditional approach to recurrent carotid stenosis has been repeat endarterectomy or patch angioplasty. Concern with the durability of repeat carotid endarterectomy has resulted in our use of carotid resection with autogenous graft interposition. This study was designed to determine the outcome and efficacy of carotid resection compared with repeat carotid endarterectomy in the management of recurrent carotid stenosis. From 1974 to 1991, 162 operations (repeat carotid endarterectomy 105, carotid resection 57) were performed for recurrent carotid stenosis. Indication for operation was hemispheric symptoms in 63% of patients, nonlateralizing symptoms in 25%, asymptomatic stenosis in 7%, and previous stroke in 5%. Ninety-one percent of patients had stenosis greater than 90% on arteriography. The perioperative stroke rate for carotid resection was 3.5%, with a subsequent rate of 0.0064 strokes per year. For repeat carotid endarterectomy, the perioperative stroke rate was 1.9% with a subsequent rate of 0.011 strokes per year. Graft patency after carotid resection was 93% (mean follow-up, 35 months). Four patients treated with carotid resection had graft thrombosis, and two of the four remained asymptomatic. After repeat carotid endarterectomy, one patient had carotid thrombosis, and recurrent stenosis greater than 50% developed in 23 patients (mean follow-up, 64 months). Twenty patients treated with repeat carotid endarterectomy underwent an additional operation for further symptomatic recurrent carotid stenosis. We conclude carotid resection is a safe and effective alternative to repeat carotid endarterectomy for patients undergoing operation for recurrent carotid stenosis.     

Comparison of regional and general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

Two hundred twenty-one patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were studied for morbidity and mortality. Thirty-seven had general anesthesia and 138 had regional anesthesia. The two groups were similar in preoperative risk factors and were operated on by a single surgeon and similar operative teams. Patient selection was prospective in the sense that the first 37 procedures were performed with general anesthesia and the next 184, with regional anesthesia. No significant difference in incidences of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attack was found. Hospital lengths of stay were similar. The type of anesthetic used for carotid endarterectomy should be the choice of the surgeon and operative team.     

The safety of carotid endarterectomy in diabetic patients: clinical predictors of adverse outcome

OBJECTIVES: Patients with diabetes mellitus have been shown to have an increased incidence of complications after elective major vascular surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate a large series of diabetic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to determine if outcome differed from nondiabetic patients and to examine predisposing factors of poor outcome among diabetic patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively compiled database was performed. From 1992 through 2000, 2151 CEAs were performed at our institution. Of these, 507 were in diabetic patients (23.6%), and the remaining 1644 procedures were in nondiabetic patients (76.4%). RESULTS: Diabetic patients were significantly more likely than nondiabetic patients to have hypertension (70.8% vs 64.5%, P = .01) and cardiac disease (54.6% vs 49.1%, P = .03). They were more likely than nondiabetic patients to be symptomatic before surgery (52.5% vs 47.1%, P = .04) and to have sustained a preoperative stroke (21.3% vs 17.7%, P = .07). No differences were noted in other recorded demographic factors or in intraoperative factors between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Despite these differences, diabetic patients had similar perioperative outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients, including perioperative myocardial infarction (0.6% vs 0.4%, P = NS), perioperative death (0.8% vs 0.5%, P = NS), and perioperative neurologic events such as transient ischemic attack and stroke (3.2% vs 2.4%, P = NS). Among diabetic patients alone, cigarette smoking, general anesthesia, the use of a shunt, and the lack of clamp tolerance while under regional anesthesia predicted adverse perioperative neurologic outcome, and contralateral occlusion was associated with increased perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increased prevalence of cardiac disease and preoperative neurologic symptoms among diabetic patients undergoing CEA, the rates of perioperative cardiac morbidity, mortality, and stroke were equal to nondiabetic patients. In contrast to nondiabetic patients, current cigarette smoking appeared to predict increased adverse neurologic outcomes among diabetic patients, and the presence of contralateral occlusion among diabetic patients appeared to predispose them towards increased perioperative mortality. The use of a general anesthetic appeared to increased perioperative neurologic risk among diabetic patients; however, this may be related to surgeon bias in the selection of anesthetic technique. Although diabetic patients may have an increase in complications after other major vascular surgical procedures, the presence of diabetes mellitus does not appear to significantly increase risk.     

Results of routine shunting and patch closure during carotid endarterectomy

BackgroundThe role of shunting and patching during carotid endarterectomy remains controversial.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series evaluating consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with routine shunting and patching. The primary endpoints were perioperative stroke, arterial injury, and lesion recurrence by duplex.ResultsOf the 220 operations performed, 43% were for symptomatic disease. Successful shunt placement occurred in 98%, with no shunt-related injuries. There was 1 minor perioperative stroke and no major strokes. At a mean follow-up of 24 months (median = 12 months), there was 1 restenosis potentially related to shunt placement. The incidence of asymptomatic >50% stenosis in the patched segment was 8%.ConclusionsA combined policy of routine shunting and patching simplifies intraoperative decision making with results that rival or exceed those of trials in which their use was not standardized. Shunts need not be avoided because of concern of arterial injury.     

Clinical and operative predictors of outcomes of carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE: The net benefit for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy is critically dependent on the risk of perioperative stroke and death. Information about risk factors can aid appropriate selection of patients and inform efforts to reduce complication rates. This study identifies the clinical, radiographic, surgical, and anesthesia variables that are independent predictors of deaths and stroke following carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in 1997 and 1998 by 64 surgeons in 6 hospitals was performed (N = 1972). Detailed information on clinical, radiographic, surgical, anesthesia, and medical management variables and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery were abstracted from inpatient and outpatient records. Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent clinical characteristics and operative techniques associated with risk-adjusted rates of combined death and nonfatal stroke as well as all strokes. RESULTS: Death or stroke occurred in 2.28% of patients without carotid symptoms, 2.93% of those with carotid transient ischemic attacks, and 7.11% of those with strokes (P < .0001). Three clinical factors increased the risk-adjusted odds of complications: stroke as the indication for surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-5.20), presence of active coronary artery disease (OR, 3.58; 95% CI = 1.53-8.36), and contralateral carotid stenosis > or =50% (OR, 2.32; 95% CI = 1.33-4.02). Two surgical techniques reduced the risk-adjusted odds of death or stroke: use of local anesthesia (OR, 0.30; 95% CI = 0.16-0.58) and patch closure (OR, 0.43; 95% CI = 0.24-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Information about these risk factors may help physicians weigh the risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in individual patients. Two operative techniques (use of local anesthesia and patch closure) may lower the risk of death or stroke.     

The influence of anesthetic choice on carotid endarterectomy outcome

This study compared the technique of general and regional cervical block anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Three hundred sixty-eight patients undergoing 399 carotid endarterectomies were administered one of these alternative anesthetics as selected preoperatively by each patient and his or her physician. In 242 cases general anesthesia was used. The other 157 cases were done under regional cervical block anesthesia. Perioperative mortality was 1.0%. Nonfatal strokes occurred in 1.25%. There were significantly more strokes in the general anesthesia group. Perioperative blood pressure was unstable for a significantly longer period of time after general anesthesia (mean, 24.6 hours) as compared with regional cervical block anesthesia (mean, 2.1 hours). Furthermore, vasoactive drugs were required for significantly longer periods of time in the general anesthesia group.     

Use of shunts with eversion carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of carotid shunting in the context of eversion endarterectomy. A comparison of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy by eversion with and without shunts was performed. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 2724 eversion carotid endarterectomies were performed. In most of these operations patients were under cervical block anesthesia. A shunt was used in 112 eversion endarterectomies (4.1%). Cervical block anesthesia was used in 103 patients (92.0%), general anesthesia was used in 5 patients (4.5%), and 4 patients (3.6%) were converted from cervical block to general anesthesia intraoperatively. The indications for shunting were neurologic deterioration in 99 patients (88.4%) who were under cervical block anesthesia, procedures performed in neurologically unstable or otherwise compromised patients who were under general anesthesia, and the operator's discretion in the remaining eight patients. RESULTS: There was a combined stroke/death rate of 2.7% in the shunt group. These three cases included one death from myocardial infarction and one delayed death due to intracerebral hemorrhage after discharge. Shunt insertion was unrelated to the negative outcome in these two cases. One perioperative major stroke in the shunt group was identified. Follow-up averaged 12.3 months (range, 1-53 months). CONCLUSION: Carotid shunts can be used effectively in the context of eversion endarterectomy. Shunt insertion is not associated with an increased stroke/death rate in these patients.     

Redo carotid surgery: An analysis of materials and configurations used in carotid reoperations and their influence on perioperative stroke and subsequent recurrent stenosis

Objective: The ideal method of arterial reconstruction in operations for recurrent carotid disease after prior endarterectomy is unknown. The goal of this study was to review a series of carotid reoperations and to determine whether the surgical technique influenced the rate of perioperative stroke, late stroke, or secondary restenosis. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 82 carotid reoperations performed on 74 patients at our institution. Results: The patient population included 39 men (52.7%) and 35 women (47.3%), with a mean age of 67.5 years. The indications for redo surgery included transient ischemic attack or amaurosis fugax in 35.3% of the patients, stroke in 6.1%, and asymptomatic restenosis (>80%) in 58.5%. Patch angioplasty with or without redo endarterectomy was used in 47 cases (57.3%), with saphenous vein in 26 (31.7%), Dacron in 15 (18.3%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 6 (7.3%). Interposition grafting was used in 35 cases (42.7%), with saphenous vein in 9 (11.0%), Dacron in 10 (12.2%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 16 (19.5%). The perioperative complications included three strokes (3.7%). There was a trend toward increased perioperative neurologic complications with interposition grafting when compared with patch angioplasty (8.6% vs 2.1%), although this did not reach statistical significance. Long-term clinical follow-up was obtained in all cases with a mean duration of 35 months, with follow-up duplex scanning performed in 89.2%. The late failures of redo surgery included four significant secondary restenoses and five total occlusions. There was a trend towards improved long-term results with interposition grafting as opposed to patch angioplasty. However, the cases in which reconstruction was performed with a vein had a significantly higher rate of late failures (stroke, secondary recurrent stenosis, or occlusion) than those in which reconstruction was performed with any prosthetic material (26.7% vs 2.3%; P = .002 by Fisher exact test). Conclusion: The use of autologous material for redo carotid surgery in any configuration appears to significantly increase the rate of subsequent recurrent stenosis or total occlusion of the operated artery. The reason for this finding is unclear but may be related to both host and technical factors. Prosthetic material may be more durable in the long-term for redo carotid surgery. Interposition grafting for redo carotid surgery may increase the perioperative neurologic complication rate to some degree; however, this was not statistically significant in this series. Interposition grafting may be a more durable solution in long-term follow-up than redo endarterectomy and patch angioplasty. A longer follow-up period will be needed to confirm this conclusion. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:72-81.)     

Routine Shunting Is a Safe and Reliable Method of Cerebral Protection during Carotid Endarterectomy

The purpose of this report is to describe the perioperative and long-term outcomes of standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with general anesthesia, routine shunting, and patching and to show that routine shunting is a safe and reliable method of cerebral protection. Between January 1998 and December 2004, 700 patients attending our Department of Vascular Surgery underwent 786 CEAs performed using a standardized technique. Forty-four patients were excluded from the analysis because they underwent combined CEA and coronary artery bypass grafting, so the analysis is based on the results of 742 CEAs in 656 patients (86 bilateral CEAs). The strict surgical protocol included general anesthesia and standard carotid bifurcation endarterectomy with routine shunting (Javid’s shunt) and Dacron patching. The Javid shunts were easily inserted in 738 cases (99.4%) but could not be used in four cases (0.5%) because of the presence of a very small internal carotid artery. The mean ischemic time required to insert the shunt and complete the suture was 4.7 min (±1.15), and the mean time to perform the endarterectomy was 34.3 min (±6.7). The mean follow-up was 24.4 months (±17.3). Overall 30-day mortality was 0.1% (one patient) due to a contralateral major stroke. The 1-month perioperative neurological complication rate was 0.7%, with three major and two minor strokes. The cumulative stroke and death rate was 0.8%. Preoperative symptoms such as hypertension, contralateral occlusion, or an age of more than 80 years were not independent risk factors for perioperative stroke. In the long-term follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated an estimated 5-year stroke-free rate of 98.0%. There were eight cases (1%) of >70% restenosis (four cases) or thrombosis (four cases) of the operated internal carotid artery during the follow-up in asymptomatic patients: in four cases, carotid stenting due to >70% restenosis led to good results. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the restenosis-free rate was 97.8%. The combined stroke and mortality rate of 0.8%, and the restenosis rate of 1% support the argument that standard CEA performed with routine shunting as brain protection leads to excellent early and long-term results.