急性化脓性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的效果

目的分析急性化脓性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的效果。方法将70例急性化脓性阑尾炎患者随机分为2组,每组35例。对照组实施开腹阑尾切除术,观察组实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、并发症发生率及住院时间等指标。结果 2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性化脓性阑尾炎,创伤小、术后并发症少、恢复时间短,治疗效果好。     

比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与常规开腹阑尾切除术的效果

目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的效果。方法随机将2016-03—2017-03间收治的106例急性阑尾炎患者分为2组,各53例。对照组实施开腹阑尾切除术,观察组实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术。比较2组的手术时间、术中出血量和术后肛门恢复排气时间、切口感染发生率及住院时间。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量和术后肛门恢复排气时间、切口感染发生率及住院时间均少于或短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与开腹阑尾切除术比较,腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,创伤小,术后患者恢复快。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术306例临床分析

目的探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效,并与开腹阑尾切除术进行比较。方法选取306例腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者和302例开腹阑尾切除术患者资料,对两组患者手术时间,术中出血量,术后疼痛评分,术后肛门排气时间,平均住院天数,术后并发症发生情况进行比较。结果腹腔镜阑尾切除术组患者术后肛门排气时间、平均住院天数、切口感染发生率、粘连性肠梗阻发生率均低于开腹阑尾切除术组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛评分、腹腔脓肿发生率无明显差异(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎疗效确切,具有创伤小、恢复快、术后并发症发生率低等优点,值得推广应用。     

腹腔镜下阑尾切除术与传统阑尾炎手术的临床疗效观察

目的分析腹腔镜下实施阑尾切除术(LA)与传统开腹阑尾炎切除术(OA)的效果。方法将接受72例阑尾切除术的患者随机分成观察组和对照组,各36例。观察组行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术,对照组行传统开腹阑尾切除术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后肛门恢复排气时间及术后并发症。结果观察组住院时间、术中出血量,术后肛门的恢复排气时间和并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与开腹阑尾切除术比,腹腔镜下阑尾切除术创伤小,患者术后恢复快,但需严格掌握适应证。     

肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术疗效的对比研究

目的 对比分析肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析2008-2010年因急性阑尾炎在中国医科大学附属盛京医院行阑尾切除术的肥胖患者153例的临床资料.153例中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术92例(其中4例转为开腹),开腹阑尾切除术61例,对两种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后止痛药使用频率、术后主要并发症的发生率、住院时间和住院费用进行比较.计数资料比较采用x2检验,计量资料采用t检验.结果 腹腔镜阑尾切除术组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后止痛药使用频率、术后主要并发症的发生率、住院时间方面均短于或少于开腹阑尾切除术组,差异有统计学意义(手术时间:t=14.0,P＜0.01;术中出血量:t =19.7,P＜0.01;术后排气时间:t=12.3,P＜0.01;术后止痛药使用频率:t=21.01,P＜0.01;术后主要并发症的发生率:x2=40.138,P＜0.01;住院时间:t=17.3,P＜0.01).两者在住院总花费上的差异无统计学意义(=1.434,P =0.154).结论 肥胖患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎与开腹阑尾切除术相比具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少和平均住院时间短等优点,是治疗肥胖阑尾炎患者理想的手术方式.     

肥胖病人行腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术的疗效对比分析

目的对比分析腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术治疗肥胖病人阑尾炎的手术效果。方法回顾性分析2003年1月-2007年11月我院行阑尾切除术治疗肥胖病人阑尾炎104例的临床资料。其中,行腹腔镜阑尾切除术73例,开腹阑尾切除术31例。比较两种术式的手术时间、切口感染和残余脓肿的发生率、住院时间和住院费用的差异。结果比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术组和开腹阑尾切除术组以上各项指标（除住院时间外）差异均无显著性意义（P〉0．05）。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗肥胖病人阑尾炎与开腹阑尾切除术相比具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少和平均住院时间短等优点,是治疗肥胖病人阑尾炎较理想的手术方式。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾周围脓肿的临床效果观察

目的比较开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾周围脓肿的效果。方法随机将52例阑尾周围脓肿患者分为2组,每组26例。腔镜组采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术,开腹组采用开腹阑尾切除术。比较2组的治疗效果。结果 2组患者均顺利完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术中出血量、并发症发生率、术后抗生素应用时间、住院时间均优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论传统开腹与应用腹腔镜实施阑尾切除术治疗阑尾周围脓肿均有可靠效果。但腹腔镜手术微创性更好、患者术后并发症少、恢复时间更短,安全性更为可靠。在严格掌握手术适应证的基础上可作为阑尾周围脓肿的首选治疗方案。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎效果分析

目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。方法将120例接受阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎患者根据手术方法不同分成2组,每组60例。对照组实施开腹手术,观察组实施腹腔镜手术。结果 2组均顺利完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者术中出血量及术后下床活动时间、镇痛药物使用率、并发症发生率、住院时间均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,创伤小、术后恢复快,并发症发生率低,安全性高。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎效果分析

目的比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。方法将50例接受阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎患者随机分为2组,各25例。对照组采用开腹手术,观察组采用腹腔镜治疗。比较2组术中出血量、下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率。结果观察组术中出血量、下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、术后并发症发生率及住院时间均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,创伤小、术后并发症发生率低,患者恢复快。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除与开腹阑尾切除术的对比研究及Meta分析

目的比较腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对急性阑尾炎的疗效和手术安全性。方法收集2006年10月至2007年10月问120例急性阑尾炎患者进行前瞻性研究,随机分为两组,分别采用腹腔镜阑尾切除（LA）术式和开腹阑尾切除（OA）术式,对手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、止痛药物应用时间、开始进食时间、住院天数和术后并发症等指标进行比较分析。并对1996年1月至2008年12月期间的该类前瞻性随机对照研究（RCT）文献进行Meta分析,比较两种术式手术时间、住院天数和并发症等指标。结果本组资料表明,两组手术时间、出血量无明显差异,而LA组肠功能恢复时间、止痛药物应用时间、住院天数明显短于OA组,LA组手术并发症也少于OA组;Meta分析有6组资料纳入,LA住院天数和手术并发症少于OA组,而两组的手术时间无明显差异。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有恢复时间短、术后疼痛轻、住院时间短和并发症发生率低等优点,值得推荐。     

急性阑尾炎行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的比较

目的对比分析腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术在治疗急性阑尾炎中的手术效果。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2011年10月58例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA组）和同期55例行开腹阑尾切除术（OA组）的急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料,比较两种术式手术时间、下床活动时间、术后排气时间、止痛药物使用率、并发症发生率、住院时间及综合费用等指标。结果 LA组与OA组相比上述指标除手术时间外差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少和住院时间短等优点,可作为治疗急性阑尾炎的理想选择。     

开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的对照研究

目的 比较开腹阑尾切除术（open appendectomy,OA）和腹腔镜阑尾切除术（laparoscopic appendectomy,LA）治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的安全性及疗效.方法 回顾性分析我院2008年1月至2013年1月收治的68例妊娠早、中期急性阑尾炎的临床资料,其中OA组36例,LA组32例,并进行比对分析.结果 两组病例手术均顺利完成,OA组和LA组在妊娠相关并发症发生率上无明显差异（P＞0.05）;而在术后肛门排气时间、住院时间及术后并发症上,LA组均明显优于OA组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 LA治疗妊娠早、中期急性阑尾炎是安全可行的,具有创伤小、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点.     

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗小儿急性阑尾炎的对比研究

目的：对比腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗小儿复杂急性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法：2004年1月至2009年1月收治小儿复杂阑尾炎253例,分别行腹腔镜阑尾切除术（laparoscopic appendectomy,LA）123例,开腹阑尾切除术（open appendectomy,OA）130例,比较两组术中出血量、恢复进食时间、术后住院时间、抗生素使用时间及术后并发症。结果：LA组术中出血量、恢复进食时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间、抗生素使用时间均明显少于OA组,LA组术后切口感染、肠梗阻、腹腔脓肿发生率低于OA组。结论：腹腔镜治疗小儿复杂急性阑尾炎的疗效明显优于开腹手术。     

腹腔镜治疗小儿阑尾炎148例分析

目的总结腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）治疗儿童阑尾炎的经验。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2011年4月行LA治疗儿童阑尾炎患儿共148例,对比同期139例开腹阑尾切除术（OA）患儿临床资料,比较术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、切口感染、置腹腔引流率、拔腹腔引流管时间、腹腔脓肿发生率、肠梗阻发生率、再次手术率差异、手术时间等指标。结果IA组与OA组比较,两组中术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、切口感染、腹腔脓肿发生率、肠梗阻发生率、再次手术率差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;置腹腔引流率、拔腹腔引流管时间差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;LA组较OA组手术时间长,差异有统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论LA适于治疗各型儿童阑尾炎,安全有效,术后并发症少,美容效果佳,是阑尾炎治疗的一种较好的方法。     

Appendicectomy: laparoscopic or ''open approach''?

AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of open appendectomy versus laparoscopic appendectomy in the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. We have compared the following items: operating time, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and costs. METHODS: The study was conducted on 435 patients admitted in our Department from December 1993 to December 2003 with diagnosis of acute appendicitis: 339 (77.9%) cases were operated with laparoscopic approach (LA group) and 96 (22.1%) cases with open approach (OA group) according to personal experience of surgeons on laparoscopic technique and patient's anthropometrical conformation. RESULTS: Mean operative time in LA group was 50 minutes (range 25-195) and 65 minutes (range 35-160) for OA group. In 15 patients (4.4%), the operation had to be converted to open approach. The morbidity was observed in 4.4% of patients for the LA group and 14.6% for the OA group. Hospital stay was faster for patients having laparoscopic appendectomy (2.5 days vs 3.5 days). Pain in the 1st and 2nd postoperative days, evaluated on the use of pain medication, was less in patient in LA group whereas the costs were higher in the LA group than in OA group. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the laparoscopic approach to acute appendicitis can be considered safe and effective with diagnostic and therapeutic value. It significantly offers all the advantages of mini-invasive surgery reported in literature.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children after the learning curve.

OBJECTIVES: Despite its increasing popularity, several recent studies comparing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) with open appendectomy (OA) in children have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in patient outcomes. Many series include the "learning curve," wherein surgeons inexperienced with laparoscopic techniques compare their results with results with OA with its extensive history. This study was designed to investigate outcomes in pediatric appendectomy patients managed by surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience. METHODS: We preformed a retrospective review of 197 consecutive children undergoing appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis from January 2002 through May 2004 at a university-affiliated community hospital by pediatric and general surgeons with extensive laparoscopic surgical experience. RESULTS: The study included 117 patients who underwent LA and 80 who underwent OA. Of 122 acute appendicitis cases, mean operating times were 47 minutes (LA) and 48 minutes (OA). The LA group (n=71) had a faster return to full diet (17.6 h vs. 28.6 h, P=0.0008), and shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS) (1.06 d vs. 1.66 d, P<0.0001) compared with the OA group (n = 51). Complication rates, time on intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and IV opiates were similar among the 2 groups. Complicated appendicitis cases (LA, n=34; OA, n=26) were similar with regard to LOS, return to normal bowel function, complication rate and time on IV antibiotics and opiates, but was associated with an increased operation time (LA, 65 min; OA, 51 min, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following the completion of the laparoscopic surgery learning curve, LA has a comparable operation time and results in a decreased postoperative LOS, and faster return to normal bowel function compared with OA in children with acute nongangrenous, nonperforated appendicitis.     

小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除与开腹阑尾切除的临床对比研究

【摘要】 目的 对比研究小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与传统开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月~2012年12月期间进行LA和OA的93例小儿阑尾炎患者的临床资料,对两组手术时间、术中出血情况、术后恢复情况等进行统计对比分析。结果〓两组患儿手术及恢复顺利,术后无严重并发症。两组手术时间及术中出血量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);LA组术后肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、切口疼痛时间、术后住院天数均低于OA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与OA比较,小儿LA具有创伤小、并发症少,恢复快及美容等优势,是治疗小儿阑尾炎理想的手术方式。     

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy has been widely practiced for uncomplicated appendicitis; various reports demonstrated its merits in assisting diagnosis, reducing postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and incidence of wound infection. The role of laparoscopy in management of complicated appendicitis, ie, gangrenous, perforated appendicitis and appendiceal abscess, remains undefined. Currently, the choice of operative approach is mostly at the surgeons' discretion. A retrospective study was conducted in our institution to review the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with complicated appendicitis. STUDY DESIGN: From January 1999 to January 2004, records of patients older than 14 years of age with diagnosis of appendicitis were retrieved from computer database for analysis. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to confirm diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, and patients subsequently underwent either laparoscopic or open appendectomies. Patients' demographics data and perioperative outcomes from the two groups were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,133 patients with acute appendicitis underwent operations in our institution. Two hundred forty-four patients (21.5%) with complicated appendicitis were identified by laparoscopy, of which 175 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and 69 had open appendectomy (OA). Both groups of patients were comparable in demographics. Mean operative time was 55 minutes for LA group and 70 minutes for the OA group (p<0.001). Mean hospital stay was 5 days and 6 days for LA and OA group respectively (p<0.001). There was one conversion patient (0.6%) in the LA group who suffered from wound infection, and there were seven (10%) wound infections in the OA group (p=0.001). There were 10 cases (5.7%) of intraabdominal collection in the LA group and 3 (4.3%) in the OA group (p=0.473). There was no mortality in the current series. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is feasible and safe. It is associated with a significantly shorter operative time, lower incidence of wound infection, and reduced length of hospital stay when compared with patients who had open appendectomy.     

Safety of Laparoscopic Appendectomy During Pregnancy

Background  Use of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remains controversial during pregnancy because data regarding procedure safety are limited. The outcome of LA in pregnant women was evaluated and compared to results of open surgery. Methods  Between January 1997 and December 2007, 42 pregnant women (mean age 24 years [range: 19–40 years]; range of gestation: 5–25 weeks) underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis: 23 laparoscopic (LA) and 19 open appendectomies (OA). Retrospective review of medical charts included preoperative information, surgery results, and outcome of the pregnancy. Results  There was no difference between groups in surgery delay following arrival at the hospital. All procedures, except one case of Meckel’s diverticulitis, were completed laparoscopically without need for conversion. Acute appendicitis was found in 19 cases and Meckel’s diverticulitis in one case during LA (87%) and in 18 cases (95%) during OA. Complicated appendicitis was found in 7 (30%) pregnant women in the LA group and 1 (5%) in the OA group. Five women with normal preoperative abdominal ultrasonography had acute appendicitis (2 in the OA group and 3 in the LA group). The laparoscopic procedure was performed more often by senior surgeons (70% of cases), and OA was more commonly done by residents (47% of cases). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications recorded. The length of postoperative hospital stay was slightly prolonged after LA—2.4 days versus 1.4 day after OA. There was one fetal loss in each group, 1 and 2 months after the operation. Conclusions  Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective during pregnancy and is associated with good maternal and fetal outcome.