腹腔镜子宫全切除术围手术期护理体会

目的总结腹腔镜子宫全切除术围手术期的护理体会。方法对92例腹腔镜子宫切除患者实施术前心理护理,完善检查、胃肠准备和术后预防并发症护理及出院指导等围手术期各项护理措施。观察手术效果及术后并发症等情况。结果 92例患者均成功完成腹腔镜子宫全切术,手术时间80~118 min,住院时间5~9 d。术后出现穿刺孔出血1例,呕吐1例,皮下气肿1例。均经对症处理或自行缓解,无中转开腹病例,未发生他并发症。结论做好腹腔镜下子宫全切术患者围手术期护理措施,对提高护理质量,减少术后并发症发生率,保证手术顺利实施具有重要意义。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除的围手术期护理

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除的护理方法.方法 对腹腔镜胆囊切除患者的护理资料进行回顾性分析.结果 158例患者无中转开腹手术,全部在腹腔镜下完成,经过精心治疗和护理后均康复出院.结论 腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种创伤小、手术时间短、痛苦少、恢复快、疗效满意的手术方式.重视心理护理,加强围术期护理,密切观察及预防术后并发症,可提高...     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术老年患者围手术期整体护理35例临床分析

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术老年患者的围手术期整体护理效果。方法选取2017-06—2017-12间在我院接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的35例老年患者,围手术期实施心理、病情监测、管道、并发症的预防等整体护理。结果 35例老年患者手术顺利,无中转开腹患者。术后出现呕吐2例,戳孔皮下气肿2例,排尿困难2例,均经对症处理后痊愈。未发生腹腔内出血、胆漏、压疮、下肢静脉栓塞形成等并发症。术后住院时间(6.12±0.64)d,患者均顺利康复出院。结论对腹腔镜胆囊切除术老年患者围手术期间实施整体护理,可提高患者手术治疗依从性,降低术后并发症发生率,促进患者术后康复。     

电视腹腔镜下胆囊切除术的围术期护理

目的探讨腹腔镜下胆囊切除围术期的护理方法。方法对386例腹腔镜下胆囊切除术患者术前进行心理护理和健康指导,术后对易出现的并发症进行细致的观察与护理。结果本组386例,除4例因粘连、术中出血中转开腹外,均痊愈出院。无穿刺孔感染、出血、腹腔内出血、肠粘连等并发症发生,平均住院4 d。结论围术期周到细致的护理是手术成功的重要保证。     

老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术围手术期的护理体会

目的探讨老年人行腹腔镜胆囊切除术围手术期的护理要点。方法对行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的54例老年患者进行全面的围手术期护理,并对护理效果进行分析与评估。结果 54例老年患者经过全面护理后,心理状态稳定,手术顺利,术后无1例患者出现并发症。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有创伤小,安全性高,术后恢复快特点,对老年患者加强腹腔镜胆囊切除术围手术期护理是有助于保证手术顺利进行,可提高手术成功率,效果肯定。     

腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术的围手术期护理

目的总结腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术围手术期的护理经验,为腹腔镜手术护理提供依据。方法对160例腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者实施术前心理护理,完善相关常规及辅助检查,术中密切配合,术后严密观察患者病情变化,及时对症处理做好出院宣教的护理措施,观察护理效果。结果 160例子宫肌瘤患者手术顺利,术中未损伤输尿管、肠管,无大出血,盆腔及切口感染等并发症。术后恢复好,均痊愈出院。结论做好腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者围术期各项护理措施,可提高手术成功率及改善预后。     

腹腔镜卵巢良性肿瘤切除术的整体护理体会

目的总结腹腔镜下卵巢良性肿瘤切除手术的整体护理体会。方法对68例接受腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤切除术的患者实施围手术期心理、营养支持和病情观察等整体护理措施,观察效果及患者对护理的满意度。结果全部患者均顺利完成腹腔镜手术。术后发生腹壁戳口出血1例、皮下气肿1例,均经相应处理后痊愈。患者对护理满意度100%。结论对腹腔镜卵巢良性肿瘤切除术患者实施围手术期整体护理措施,可减少患者恐惧、紧张等心理,降低手术风险,提高手术的安全性和护理工作质量。     

基层医院卵巢癌不同手术方式治疗与护理

目的:探索卵巢癌手术方式开腹及腹腔镜治疗卵巢癌的围手术期护理方法.方法:分析我院2010年1月至2012年1月在我科室进行的20例卵巢癌手术,其中开腹手术8例,腹腔镜手术1 2例,针对卵巢癌围手术期护理要点,制定护理计划开展围手术期的优质护理服务,使患者满意家属放心.结果:通过围手期的充分准备,术前加强基础护理、心理护理.术后加强引流管护理、饮食护理、心理护理、重视并发症预防与观察.20例患者术后无重大并发症发生,术后恢复较好,患者生活质量均达到预期效果.结论:加强对卵巢癌患者围手术期的护理,掌握其开腹或者腹腔镜手术护理要点,能提高手术成功率和降低并发症发生率.     

胆囊切除术患者围手术期的护理体会

目的总结胆囊切除术围手术期的护理体会。方法对58例行胆囊切除术的患者围手术期积极给予心理疏导,管道护理、饮食指导等护理干预。结果本组患者均成功完成手术,术后排气时间(2.11±0.64)d。发生切口感染3例(开腹胆囊切除术2例,小切口胆囊切除术1例),胆漏1例(开腹胆囊切除术),皮下气肿1例(腹腔镜胆囊切除术)。并发症发生率为8.62%,均遵医嘱予以对症处理后痊愈。住院时间(6.82±3.12)d,均顺利出院。结论对行胆囊切除术的患者实施围术期精心护理,可提高手术成功率、降低术后并发症发生率。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期的整体护理

目的分析腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者围手术期的整体护理效果。方法对32例LC患者给予术前心理支持、术中密切配合及术后病情观察,保持引流管通畅,健康教育等围手术期整体护理干预。观察患者效果及患者对护理工作的满意率。结果本组患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹病例。术后肛门恢复排气时间(17.23±5.37)h、住院时间(5.34±2.12)d,术后并发症发生率6.25%(2/32)。出院时发放护理满意率调查表,结果显示:患者对护理工作满意率96.88%(31/32)。结论对行LC患者实施围手术期整体护理干预,能降低术后并发症发生率,促进患者早期恢复,提高患者对护理工作满意率。     

Laparoscopic versus open resection of colorectal liver metastasis

Background

Findings have shown laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) to be feasible and safe, but the data in the literature regarding oncologic outcomes are scant. This study aimed to compare the perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes between LLR and open resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM).

Methods

Between January 2006 and April 2012, 40 patients underwent LLR of CLM. These patients were compared with a consecutive matched group of 40 patients who underwent open resection within the same period. Data were obtained from a prospective institutional review board (IRB)-approved database. Statistical analysis was performed using t test, Chi-square, and Kaplan–Meier survival.

Results

The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, tumor size, number of tumors, and type of resections performed. The operative time was similar in the two groups, but the estimated blood loss was less in the LLR group than in the open resection group. The length of stay was shorter in the LLR group (3.7 vs 6.5 days; p < 0.001). The 2-year overall survival rate was 89 % for LLR and 81 % for open resection. The median disease-free survival time was 23 months in each group.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that LLR is associated with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay than open resection for CLM. According to our short-term results, LLR is equivalent to open resection in terms of oncologic outcomes.     

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are widely accepted as safe and effective procedures for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the hands of experienced surgeons. The efficacy and extent of benefits of pure as well as hand-assisted laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted liver resection over open liver resection (OLR) have been investigated by numerous studies during the last 10 years. The aim of our meta-analysis is to investigate the effect of LLR in short- and long-term outcomes compared to OLR in patients operated for HCC. A total of 5203 patients from forty-four studies were included in our meta-analysis reporting for short- and long-term results for both LLR and OLR for HCC. Among them, 1830 underwent pure laparoscopic hepatectomy, 282 underwent pure laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted hepatectomy, and 3091 were operated through open approach. LLRs were found to be significantly associated with lower blood loss, need for blood transfusion, successful achievement of R0 resection as well as wider resection margin, shorter hospital stay, lower morbidity and 30-day mortality rates. Operative time, tumor recurrence, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival were not found different between the groups. This meta-analysis clearly demonstrates the superiority of laparoscopic resection over the open approach for patients with small HCC.     

腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌的围手术期和近期疗效观察

目的 本研究基于倾向评分匹配（PSM）对比腹腔镜肝切除术（LLR）和开腹肝切除术（OLR）治疗复发性肝细胞癌（rHCC）的围手术期和近期疗效,探讨其治疗安全性、有效性和临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年12月在温州市人民医院接受手术治疗的49例rHCC患者,按照手术方式分为LLR组（27例）和OLR组（22例）,通过倾向性评分匹配（PSM）筛选出34例用于数据分析,比较两组的临床基本资料、围手术期结果和术后复发情况。结果 PSM前,OLR组肿瘤大小、术中出血量和输血量、术后并发症发生率、住院时间均明显高于LLR组（P<0.05）。PSM后,两组在肿瘤大小、术中输血量和术后并发症发生率方面均无统计学差异,但LLR组术中出血量和术后住院时间明显少于OLR组（P<0.05）。两组无复发生存期（RFS）差异无统计学意义（P=0.383）。结论 LLR治疗rHCC可减少术中出血量和输血量,减少并发症发生率,缩短住院时间,围手术期和近期疗效优于OLR。在严格掌握手术适应证的前提下,LLR具有良好的安全可行性。     

Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study

Background/objectivesThere is limited availability of well-designed comparative studies using propensity score matching with a sufficient sample size to compare laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) vs. open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of LLR and OLR in patients with HCC.MethodsWe enrolled 168 patients who underwent elective LLR (n = 58) or OLR (n = 110) for HCC in two tertiary medical centers between November 2009 and December 2018. Patients who underwent LLR were propensity score-matched to patients who underwent OLR in a 1:1 ratio. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes and disease-free and overall survival rates were prospectively evaluated.ResultsAmong the 116 patients analyzed, 58 each belonged to the LLR and OLR groups. We performed 85 segmentectomies or sectionectomies, 19 left-lateral-sectionectomies, 9 left-hemihepatectomies, and 3 right-hemihepatectomies. There was no significant difference in age, sex, Child-Pugh class, original liver disease, preoperative alpha-fetoprotein, tumor size, tumor location, overall morbidity, and operative time. There was a significant difference in the length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (LLR vs OLR; 8 vs 10 days, p = 0.003). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in the LLR and OLR groups were 96.6%, 92.8%, and 73.3% and 93.1%, 88.8%, and 76.1%, respectively (p = 0.642). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates in the LLR and OLR groups were 84.4%, 64.0%, and 60.2% and 93.1%, 67.4%, and 63.9%, respectively (p = 0.391).ConclusionLLR for HCC can be performed safely with acceptable short-term and long-term outcomes compared with OLR.     

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Tumors in the Left Lateral Liver Section

Background:

The laparoscopic approach is increasingly adopted for liver resections today especially for lesions located in the left lateral liver section. This study was conducted to determine the impact of the introduction of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) as a surgical option for suspected small- to medium-sized (<8 cm) tumors located in the left lateral section (LLS).

Methods:

This is a retrospective review of 156 consecutive patients who underwent LLR or open liver resection (OLR) of tumors located in the LLS. The study was divided into 2 consecutive periods (period 1, January 2003 through September 2006, and period 2, October 2006 through April 2014); LLR was available as a surgical option only in the latter period. Comparisons made were LLR versus OLR, LLR versus OLR (in period 2 only), and resections performed in period 1 versus period 2.

Results:

Forty-two patients underwent LLR with 4 conversions. LLR was significantly associated with a longer median operative time [167.5 minutes (range, 60–525) vs 105 minutes (range, 40–235); P < .001], decreased need for the Pringle maneuver [n = 1 (2%) vs 22 (19%); P = .008], and shorter postoperative stay [n = 4 (range, 1–10) days vs 5 days (range, 2–47); P < .001] compared with open resection. Comparison of the 42 patients who underwent LLR with the 64 contemporaneous patients who underwent OLR demonstrated similar outcomes. Again, LLR was associated with a significantly longer operation, decreased need for the Pringle maneuver, and shorter hospital stay.

Conclusions:

LLR can be safely adopted to treat lesions in the LLS. The procedure is associated with a shorter postoperative stay and a decreased need for the Pringle maneuver, but longer operative time compared with that required for OLR.     

Laparoscopic liver resection facilitates salvage liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/Purpose  In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a previous liver resection (LR) may compromise subsequent liver transplantation (LT) by creating adhesions and increasing surgical difficulty. Initial laparoscopic LR (LLR) may reduce such technical consequences, but its effect on subsequent LT has not been reported. We report the operative results of LT after laparoscopic or open liver resection (OLR). Methods  Twenty-four LT were performed, 12 following prior LLR and 12 following prior OLR. The LT was performed using preservation of the inferior vein cava. Indication for the LT was recurrent HCC in 19 cases (salvage LT), while five patients were listed for LT and underwent resection as a neoadjuvant procedure (bridge resection). Results  In the LLR group, absence of adhesions was associated with straightforward access to the liver in all cases. In the OLR group, 11 patients required long and hemorrhagic dissection. Median durations of the hepatectomy phase and whole LT were 2.5 and 6.2 h, and 4.5 and 8.3 h in the LLR and OLR groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Median blood loss was 1200 ml and 2300 ml in the LLR and OLR groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Median transfusions of hepatectomy phase and whole LT were 0 and 3 U, and 2 and 6 U, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no postoperative deaths. Conclusions  In our study, LLR facilitated the LT procedure as compared with OLR in terms of reduced operative time, blood loss and transfusion requirements. We conclude that LLR should be preferred over OLR when feasible in potential transplant candidates.     

Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral lesions—a comparison experience in an Asian centre

Background

Minimally invasive surgery has been one of the recent developments in liver surgery, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was initially performed for benign lesions at easily accessible locations. As the surgical techniques, technology and experience improved over the past decades, LLR surgery had evolved to tackle malignant lesions, major resections and even in difficult locations without compromising safety and principles of oncology. It was also shown to be beneficial in cirrhotic patients. We describe our initial experience with LLR in a population with significant proportion having cirrhosis, emphasising our approach for lesions in the posterosuperior (PS) segments of the liver (segments 1, 4a, 7, and 8).

Methods

A review of patients undergoing LLR in single institution from 2006 to 2015 was performed from a prospective surgical database. Clinicopathological, operative and perioperative parameters were analyzed to compare outcomes in patients who underwent LLR for PS vs. anterolateral lesions (AL).

Results

LLR was performed in consecutive 197 patients, with a mean age of 60 years. The indications for resection were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n=105; 53%), colorectal cancer liver metastasis (n=31; 16%), other malignancies (n=19; 10%) and benign lesions (n=42; 21%). A significant proportion had liver cirrhosis (25.9%). More females underwent surgery in the AL group and indications for surgery were similar between both groups. Major liver resection was performed more frequently for the PS group than for the AL group (P<0.001) and significantly more PS resections was performed in our latter experience (P=0.02). The mean operative time and the conversion rate were significantly greater in the PS group than in the AL group (P≤0.001 and 0.03, respectively). However, the estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of blood transfusion and mean postoperative stay were similar in the two groups (P=0.04, 0.88 and 0.92, respectively). The overall 90-day morbidity and mortality rate was 21.3% and 0.5% respectively, with no differences between the two groups. Surrogates of difficulty such as operative time, blood loss, conversion and outcomes e.g., morbidity and mortality, were similar in patients who underwent PS resections with or without cirrhosis.

Conclusions

LLR in selected patients is technically feasible and safe including cirrhotic patients with lesions in the PS segments.     

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results

Background  Concerns have been raised regarding outcome after laparoscopic resection of hepatic neoplasms. This prospective study compared morbidity and adequacy of surgical margins in laparoscopic (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR). Methods  Outcome in 359 consecutive patients [male/female ratio 187/172; median age 60 years (range 18–84 years)] who underwent partial hepatectomy was analysed. Cirrhosis was present in 32 patients and preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 141 patients. Comparative analyses were performed using propensity scores for all and for matched patients (n = 76 per group). Results  Complications occurred in 68/250 (27.2%) patients after OLR and in 6/109 (5.5%) after LLR [odds ratio (OR) 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.37; p < 0.0001]. Median intraoperative blood loss was 500 ml (range 10–7,000 ml) in OLR and 100 ml (range 5–4,000 ml) in LLR (p < 0.0001). Postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 0–155 days) after OLR and 6 days (range 0–41 days) after LLR (p < 0.0001). In patients treated for liver malignancy, the surgical resection margin was positive on histopathological examination in 5/237 after OLR and in 1/77 after LLR. The magnitude of the resection margin was 7.5 mm (range 0–45 mm) in OLR and 10.0 mm (range 0–30 mm) in LLR (p = 0.087). Conclusions  LLR for hepatic neoplasms seems to be noninferior to OLR regarding adequacy of surgical margins, and superior to OLR regarding short-term postoperative outcome.     

腹腔镜手术治疗高龄肝细胞癌患者的临床疗效分析

目的:比较腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)与开放肝切除术(OLR)治疗高龄肝细胞癌患者的近期疗效与远期生存率。方法:回顾分析2014年1月至2017年12月手术治疗的52例高龄患者的临床资料,依据手术方式分为两组,OLR组(n=26)行开腹手术,LLR组(n=26)行腹腔镜手术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肝功能指标、术后恢复情况及远期生存率。结果:LLR组手术时间长于OLR组,术中出血量、术后引流管留置时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率优于OLR组,差异有统计学意义。术后第5天,LLR组ALT、TBIL水平低于OLR组,ALB水平高于OLR组,差异有统计学意义。两组术后1年、3年总生存率、无瘤生存率差异无统计学意义。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗高龄肝细胞癌患者疗效可靠,术中出血少,术后并发症发生率低,术后恢复快的同时降低了对肝功能的影响。     

Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study

Background: Although the feasibility of minor laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) has been demonstrated, data comparing the open vs the laparoscopic approach to liver resection are lacking. Methods: We compared 30 LLR with 30 open liver resections (OLR) in a pair-matched analysis. The indications for resection were malignant disease in 47% of the LLR and 83% of the OLR. The average size of the lesions was 42 mm for LLR and 41 mm for OLR. Five wedge resections, 12 segmentectomies, and 13 bisegmentectomies were performed in each group. Results: The conversion rate for LLR was nil. The mean operative time was 148 min for LLR and 142 min for OLR. Mean blood loss was minimal in the LLR group (320 vs 479 ml; p < 0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 6.6% of the patients in each group; there were no deaths. The mean postoperative hospital stay was shorter for LLR patients (6.4 vs 8.7 days; p < 0.05). In tumors, the resection margin was <1 cm in 43% of the LLR patients and 40% of the OLR patients (p = NS). Conclusions: Minor LLR of the anterior segments has the same rates of mortality and morbidity as OLR. However, the laparoscopic approach reduces blood loss and postoperative hospital stay.