Recovery and Utilization of Deceased Donor Kidneys from Small Pediatric Donors

The optimal use of kidneys from small pediatric deceased donors remains undetermined. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 2886 small (< 21 kg) pediatric donors between 1993 and 2002 were identified. Donor factors predictive of kidney recovery and transplantation (1343 en bloc; 1600 single) were identified by logistic regression. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the risk of graft loss. The rate of kidney recovery from small pediatric donors was significantly higher with increasing age, weight and height. The odds of transplant of recovered small donor kidneys were significantly higher with increasing age, weight, height and en bloc recovery (adjusted odds ratio = 65.8 vs. single; p < 0.0001), and significantly lower with increasing creatinine. Compared to en bloc, solitary transplants had a 78% higher risk of graft loss (p < 0.0001). En bloc transplants had a similar graft survival to ideal donors (p = 0.45) while solitary transplants had an increased risk of graft loss (p < 0.0001). En bloc recovery of kidneys from small pediatric donors may result in the highest probability of transplantation. Although limited by the retrospective nature of the study, kidneys transplanted en bloc had a similar graft survival to ideal donors but may not maximize the number of successfully transplanted recipients.     

A Multiparametric Nomogram for Predicting Delayed Graft Function in Adult Recipients of Pediatric Donor Kidneys

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is one of the most common postoperative complications after kidney transplantation. The ability to predict DGF after transplantation can greatly aid clinical decision-making. Several models have been proposed to predict DGF in adult recipients of adult donor kidneys, but there is currently no model to predict DGF in adult recipients of pediatric donor transplants. Therefore, based on our medical records, we retrospectively investigated the pretransplant risk factors of DGF in transplants from pediatric donors to adult recipients.MethodsOur center is in compliance with national laws, the Declaration of Istanbul, and the Helsinki Congress. The donors used by us were organs donated after the death of citizens and the participants were neither paid nor coerced. A retrospective review of 84 adult patients who received pediatric donor kidneys at a single center from April 4, 2015 to November 17, 2021 was conducted to investigate the pretransplant risk factors for the development of DGF.ResultsDGF was observed in 45 of 68 patients (66.17%) in the training group and 9 of 16 patients (56.25%) in the validation group. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that kidney donor profile index, cold ischemia time, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and pretransplant dialysis duration were significant independent risk factors for DGF. By integrating these 4 factors, we constructed a nomogram model to predict DGF. According to the prediction model, the area under the curve of DGF of the training group and validation group was 0.899 and 0.905, respectively.ConclusionWe have constructed a novel, reliable, and accurate visual nomogram that provides a practical tool for predicting DGF in adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys.     

Recovery Factors Affecting Utilization of Small Pediatric Donor Kidneys

Kidneys from small pediatric donors are underutilized. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for donors <21 kg in which at least one organ was recovered from 1997 to 2007 (n = 3341), donor and recovery factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis for associations with (a) kidney nonrecovery and (b) transplantation of recovered kidneys. Results: The proportion of kidney recoveries were 55% during liver procurements and 40% during intestine procurements amongst donors <10 kg (p < 0.01) compared to 93% and 88%, respectively, for donors weighing 10–20 kg (p = 0.003). Intestine procurement was independently associated with an 81% greater likelihood of kidney nonrecovery (p < 0.0001) and a 48% lower likelihood of transplantation (p = 0.0004). A multivariate Cox model indicated that single kidney recipients had a 63% higher risk of graft failure compared with en bloc kidney recipients (p < 0.0001); however, concurrent intestine recovery was not a significant risk factor for graft loss. Intestine recovery from donors <21 kg of age is strongly associated with higher kidney nonrecovery and lower transplantation rates. Graft survival is worse with single kidney transplantation, but is not significantly affected by intestine recovery. Small pediatric donors procurement teams should strive to increase kidney recoveries overall and en bloc recoveries in particular.     

Anderson-Fabry Disease in Kidneys from Deceased Donor

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a rare, X-linked lysosomal storage disease that leads to progressive intracellular accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in visceral organs and the vascular endothelium. We report two patients with end-stage renal disease who received renal allograft from deceased female donor who died from heart failure. A 62-year-old women received a renal allograft in July 2006. Except for low-range proteinuria, renal function was normal until 6 months after transplantation when serum creatinine increased from 120 to 150 micromol/L. A renal biopsy was performed. Based on the specific pathological finding, AFD in donor was suspected. In order to prove the diagnosis, the other recipient also underwent renal biopsy 3 months later. This was 45-year-old female with stable graft function and nonnephrotic proteinuria. Light microscopic findings included a 'foamy' appearance of affected cells with swelling and vacuolization of podocytes. Electron microscopic finding show mesangial cells and podocytes filled with dense lysosomal granules appearing as myelin figures and 'zebra bodies'. Changes were less intensive than in the biopsy of the first recipient. The donor was 54-year-old Italian women who died on the Adriatic coast after heart attack. This is the first case of AFD found in a kidney allograft from deceased donor.     

Utilization of Deceased Donor Kidneys to Initiate Living Donor Chains

We propose that some deceased donor (DD) kidneys be allocated to initiate nonsimultaneous extended altruistic donor chains of living donor (LD) kidney transplants to address, in part, the huge disparity between patients on the DD kidney waitlist and available donors. The use of DD kidneys for this purpose would benefit waitlisted candidates in that most patients enrolled in kidney paired donation (KPD) systems are also waitlisted for a DD kidney transplant, and receiving a kidney through the mechanism of KPD will decrease pressure on the DD pool. In addition, a LD kidney usually provides survival potential equal or superior to that of DD kidneys. If KPD chains that are initiated by a DD can end in a donation of an LD kidney to a candidate on the DD waitlist, the quality of the kidney allocated to a waitlisted patient is likely to be improved. We hypothesize that a pilot program would show a positive impact on patients of all ethnicities and blood types.     

Inferior Early Posttransplant Outcomes for Recipients of Right Versus Left Deceased Donor Kidneys: An ANZDATA Registry Analysis

Anatomical differences between right and left kidneys could influence transplant outcome. We compared graft function and survival for left and right kidney recipients transplanted from the same deceased organ donor. Adult recipients of 4900 single kidneys procured from 2450 heart beating deceased donors in Australia and New Zealand from 1995 to 2009 were included in a paired analysis. Right kidneys were associated with more delayed graft function (DGF) (25 vs. 21% for left kidneys, p < 0.001) and, if not affected by DGF, a slower fall in serum creatinine. One‐year graft survival was lower for right kidneys (89.1 vs. 91.1% for left kidneys, p = 0.001), primarily attributed to surgical complications (66 versus 35 failures for left kidneys). Beyond the first posttransplant year, kidney side was not associated with eGFR, graft or patient survival. Receipt of a right kidney is a risk factor for inferior outcomes in the first year after transplantation. A higher incidence of surgical complications suggests the shorter right renal vein may be contributory. The higher susceptibility of right kidneys to injury should be considered in organ allocation.     

The Broad Spectrum of Quality in Deceased Donor Kidneys

The quality of the deceased donor organ clearly is one of the most crucial factors in determining graft survival and function in recipients of a kidney transplant. There has been considerable effort made towards evaluating these organs culminating in an amendment to allocation policy with the introduction of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) policy.
Our study, from first solitary adult deceased donor transplant recipients from 1996 to 2002 in the National Scientific Transplant Registry database, presents a donor kidney risk grade based on significant donor characteristics, donor–recipient matches and cold ischemia time, generated directly from their risk for graft loss. We investigated the impact of our donor risk grade in a naïve cohort on short- and long-term graft survival, as well as in subgroups of the population.
The projected half-lives for overall graft survival in recipients by donor risk grade were I (10.7 years), II (10.0 years), III (7.9 years), IV (5.7 years) and V (4.5 years). This study indicates that there is great variability in the quality of deceased donor kidneys and that the assessment of risk might be enhanced by this scoring system as compared to the simple two-tiered system of the current ECD classification.     

Identifying Appropriate Recipients for CDC Infectious Risk Donor Kidneys

Over 10% of deceased donors in 2011 met PHS/CDC criteria for infectious risk donor (IRD), and discard rates are significantly higher for kidneys from these donors. We hypothesized that patient phenotypes exist for whom the survival benefit outweighs the infectious risk associated with IRDs. A patient‐oriented Markov decision process model was developed and validated, based on SRTR data and meta‐analyses of window period risks among persons with IRD behaviors. The Markov model allows patients to see, for their phenotype, their estimated survival after accepting versus declining an IRD offer, graphed over a 5‐year horizon. Estimated 5‐year survival differences associated with accepting IRDs ranged from ?6.4% to +67.3% for a variety of patient phenotypes. Factors most predictive of the survival difference with IRD transplantation were age, PRA, previous transplant, and the expected time until the next non‐IRD deceased donor offer. This study suggests that survival benefit derived from IRD kidneys varies widely by patient phenotype. Furthermore, within the inherent limitations of model‐based prediction, this study demonstrates that it is possible to identify those predicted to benefit from IRD kidneys, and illustrates how estimated survival curves based on a clinical decision can be presented to better inform patient and provider decision‐making.

     

Transplantation of Kidneys from Deceased Adult Polycystic Donors

Renal transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. The discrepancy between donor organ supply and demand continues to widen. Maximum efforts should be made to make use of donor kidneys and we suggest that polycystic kidneys can be suitable marginal donor organs. Five polycystic cadaveric donor kidneys were transplanted in four recipients at our institution between year 2000 and 2004. The donor kidneys were either of normal size or moderately enlarged (less than 15 x 10 cm). Donor ages were 24, 46 and 55 years. All donors had normal serum creatinine at the time of organ retrieval. Recipients gave informed consent to be transplanted with the polycystic kidneys. Three of four recipients had primary graft function. The patient with primary nonfunction required graft nephrectomy 8 weeks post-transplantation. One patient died due to cardiovascular causes with a functioning graft 18 months after transplantation. Two patients remain well, 26 and 58 months after transplantation, with normal graft function. Our experience and the limited evidence from the literature suggest that, with careful selection of both donor and recipient, transplantation of cadaveric polycystic donor kidneys should be considered given the current organ shortage.     

Incidence and Severity of Acute Cellular Rejection in Recipients Undergoing Adult Living Donor or Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation‡

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may have better immunological outcomes compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after LDLT and DDLT. Data from the adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALL) retrospective cohort study on 593 liver transplants done between May 1998 and March 2004 were studied (380 LDLT; 213 DDLT). Median LDLT and DDLT follow‐up was 778 and 713 days, respectively. Rates of clinically treated and biopsy‐proven ACR were compared. There were 174 (46%) LDLT and 80 (38%) DDLT recipients with ≥1 clinically treated episodes of ACR, whereas 103 (27%) LDLT and 58 (27%) DDLT recipients had ≥1 biopsy‐proven ACR episode. A higher proportion of LDLT recipients had clinically treated ACR (p = 0.052), but this difference was largely attributable to one center. There were similar proportions of biopsy‐proven rejection (p = 0.97) and graft loss due to rejection (p = 0.16). Longer cold ischemia time was associated with a higher rate of ACR in both groups despite much shorter median cold ischemia time in LDLT. These data do not show an immunological advantage for LDLT, and therefore do not support the application of unique posttransplant immunosuppression protocols for LDLT recipients.     

Age Should Be Considered in the Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidneys

Organ allocation is a specific example of the allocation of scarce resources in a pluralistic society. As such, it is subject to both governmental and public scrutiny. It must follow the requirements of the federal legislation and regulations regarding “equitable allocation of organs.” An ideal allocation system should balance the ethical concepts of equity, or fairness, and utility, or usefulness. The current kidney allocation system has been in place, with some modifications over time, since the mid‐1980s. It suffers from the changing demographics in ESRD, notably the aging of these groups, and in the growing length of the kidney waiting list. The current algorithm is thus imbalanced and requires reexamination. In particular, the system fails to match kidneys with long‐projected function to recipients with long‐projected lifespans, and vice versa. To improve the utility of kidney transplantation and lengthen the useful lifespan of these organs, a system that better matches kidneys and recipients is necessary, and this will require the use of recipient age in those calculations. The ethical questions and justification of such a system are presented.     

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Before and After Utilizing Estimated Posttransplant Survival Score for Kidneys Allocation in Malaysia

Background. The Malaysian Kidney Allocation System implemented in 2020 includes only kidney transplant candidates with estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) score of ≤20%, in replacement of Malaysian Organs Sharing System, which was based solely on dialysis vintage. We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs) with EPTS ≤20% to those with EPTS >20%.Methods. All DDKTRs between January 1, 2015, and December 29, 2020, were included and categorized into 2 groups: EPTS ≤20% and EPTS >20%. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association of EPTS score and patient survival. The rate of postoperative complications, graft failure and patient survival were compared between 2 groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS v26 and R v4.0.4. The study complies with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration.Results. We included 159 DDKTRs, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 10-60 months). The mean age of those with EPTS ≤20% was 32.2 ± 3.4 years and those with EPTS >20% was 46.0 ± 6.7 years, and the median EPTS score were 16% (range, 12%-18%) and 38% (range, 27%-56.5%), respectively. EPTS score was associated with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.031; 95% CI 1.010-1.052; P = .003), and the cutoff points of 30% and above were associated with worse survival. It showed good discrimination (C-index, 0.729; 95% CI 0.579-0.878; P = .003) and the optimal cutoff value was 38% (65.5% sensitivity, 68.8% specificity, 17.8% positive predictive value, and 95.8% negative predictive value). Both groups had similar rate of surgical complications (P = .191), graft failure (P = .503), and patient survival (P = .654), but those with EPTS >20% had higher incidence of urinary tract infection (9.3% vs 27.6%, P = .016).Conclusions. There was no difference in clinical outcomes using an EPTS cutoff point of 20% but worse patient survival if higher cutoff point was used.     

Geographic Determinants of Access to Pediatric Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Children receive priority in the allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation in the United States, but because allocation begins locally, geographic differences in population and organ supply may enable variation in pediatric access to transplantation. We assembled a cohort of 3764 individual listings for pediatric kidney transplantation in 2005–2010. For each donor service area, we assigned a category of short (<180 days), medium (181–270 days), or long (>270 days) median waiting time and calculated the ratio of pediatric-quality kidneys to pediatric candidates and the percentage of these kidneys locally diverted to adults. We used multivariable Cox regression analyses to examine the association between donor service area characteristics and time to deceased donor kidney transplantation. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of median waiting time to transplantation was 284 days (95% confidence interval, 263 to 300 days) and varied from 14 to 1313 days across donor service areas. Overall, 29% of pediatric-quality kidneys were locally diverted to adults. Compared with areas with short waiting times, areas with long waiting times had a lower ratio of pediatric-quality kidneys to candidates (3.1 versus 5.9; P<0.001) and more diversions to adults (31% versus 27%; P<0.001). In multivariable regression, a lower kidney to candidate ratio remained associated with longer waiting time (hazard ratio, 0.56 for areas with <2:1 versus reference areas with ≥5:1 kidneys/candidates; P<0.01). Large geographic variation in waiting time for pediatric deceased donor kidney transplantation exists and is highly associated with local supply and demand factors. Future organ allocation policy should address this geographic inequity.Compared with dialysis, kidney transplantation confers significant survival and quality of life benefits for children with ESRD, while offering time-sensitive opportunities for growth and psychosocial development.¹ In the United States, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) has responsibility for allocating deceased donor organs for transplantation. Recognizing the unique benefits of transplantation for children, the OPTN implemented the “Share 35” policy in 2005. This policy gives a high priority to pediatric candidates (aged<18 years at listing) when allocating kidneys from local deceased donors aged<35 years.² However, two features of the allocation system create substantial potential for geographic variation in pediatric waiting time for a deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT). First, certain categories of adult candidates receive even higher priority than children. Second, kidneys are usually allocated to children and adults locally before being offered to children in other areas.²Federal law and guidelines direct the OPTN to allocate organs in a way that is efficient and equitable. The National Organ Transplant Act also acknowledges the unique benefits of transplantation for pediatric patients.^3,4 Despite this acknowledgment, at least three categories of adults may divert a high-quality kidney from pediatric candidates.² An adult candidate for multiorgan transplantation (MOT) can get maximum priority for a kidney if that candidate has been designated to receive another organ from the same donor. Because of a lack of widely accepted clinical criteria for MOT, rates of MOT (e.g., liver-kidney transplantation) vary widely between centers.⁵ Second, an adult with antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) can receive higher priority for a biologically compatible kidney allograft than pediatric candidates. Lastly, an adult who is a zero antigen mismatch with a donated kidney can take priority over a pediatric candidate.²Although federal regulations stipulate that organ allocation should not depend on a candidate’s location, kidney allocation usually begins locally.⁴ The OPTN created a system of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) to work with transplant centers and local communities in performing deceased donor organ recovery.³ Each OPO serves a geographically defined donor service area (DSA). DSAs vary widely in size, population characteristics, and in the volume of donated organs.⁶ A kidney is usually offered first to transplant candidates in the DSA where it was procured before being offered to candidates elsewhere.The aim of this study was to examine whether geographic variation in patient-level and DSA-level factors influences pediatric waiting time for DDKT. At the DSA level, we hypothesized that longer waiting time for DDKT would be associated with (1) lower ratios of high-quality kidneys to pediatric candidates and (2) higher rates of diversions of high-quality kidneys to adult candidates.     

Living-Related Versus Deceased Donor Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Multivariate Analysis of Technical and Immunological Complications in 235 Recipients

Timely access to a living donor (LD) reduced pretransplant mortality in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that this strategy may provide better posttransplant outcome. Between July 1993 and April 2002, 235 children received a primary LT from a LD (n = 100) or a deceased donor (DD) (n = 135). Demographic, surgical and immunological variables were compared, and respective impact on posttransplant complications was studied using a multivariate analysis. Five-year patient survival rates were 92% and 85% for groups LD and DD, respectively (p = 0.181), the corresponding graft survival rates being 89% and 77% (p = 0.033). At multivariate analysis: (1) type of donor (DD) was correlated with higher rate of artery thrombosis (p < 0.012); (2) biliary complication rate at 5 years was 29% and 23% for groups LD and DD, respectively (p = 0.451); (3) lower acute rejection incidence could be correlated with type of donor (DD) (p = 0.001), and immunosuppressive therapy (tacrolimus) (p < 0.001). We conclude that (1) according to the multivariate analysis, LT with LD provided similar patient and graft outcome, when compared to DD; (2) a higher rate of artery thrombosis and a lower rate of rejection were observed in group DD; (3) this study confirms the efficacy of tacrolimus for immunoprophylaxis, whatever the type of organ donor is.