Body Mass Index and Kidney Donor Profile Index as Prognostic Markers of the Outcome of Renal Transplantation

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and body mass index (BMI) of the deceased donor on the kidney allograft outcome 1 year after transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 98 deceased kidney allograft donors with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. The donors were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: Normal ΒΜΙ = 25 (n = 25); ΒΜΙ 25 to 29 = Overweight (n = 33); ΒΜΙ 30 to 34.9 = Obese class I (n = 19); ΒΜΙ 35 to 39 = Obese class ΙΙ (n = 11); and ΒΜΙ >40 = Obese class III (n = 10). We examined the impact of the deceased donor's BMI and KDPI on delayed graft function (DGF) and estimated renal glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (measured by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) 1 year after transplantation.ResultsDonor BMI significantly increased the prevalence of DGF (P = .031), and it was associated with higher cold ischemia time (P = .021). However, there was no significant association between the aforementioned BMI groups and 1-year eGFR (P = 0.57), as deceased grafts from donors with increased BMI (BMI > 40) gained sufficient renal function during the first year of transplantation. Moreover, high KDPI was associated not only with DGF (P = .015), but also with decreased values of eGFR (P = .033).ConclusionIn this population, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants. KDPI, and not ΒΜΙ, of the deceased donor seems to be a good prognostic factor of renal function at the end of the first year after kidney transplant, whereas high BMI and high KDPI markedly induce DGF.     

Total Cell-Free DNA as a Noninvasive Biomarker of a Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

BackgroundBecause of the organ shortage, donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation (KTx) is an alternative way of achieving KTx using brain-dead donors (BDs). Although the prognosis of DCD-KTx is improving, the graft suffers from delayed graft function (DGF), the management of which is essential. With progress in understanding the characteristics of cell-free DNA (CF-DNA), we consider plasma total CF-DNA (tCF-DNA) to be a useful biomarker for predicting DGF in DCD-KTx.Study Design and MethodConsecutive patients from living donors (LDs; n = 9), BDs (n = 8), or DCD donors (n = 13) were enrolled. Plasma samples were collected after KTx and on postoperative days 3 and 5. CF-DNA was isolated, and tCF-DNA was quantified using the TapeStation 2200 software program.ResultsThe tCF-DNA levels after BD-KTx and DCD-KTx were higher than those after LD-KTx (LD, 78 ± 27 (ng/mL); BD, 99 ± 20; DCD, 150 ± 23); the difference between DCD-KTx and LD-KTx was statistically significant (P < .05). The tCF-DNA levels declined at postoperative day 5 (LD, 45 ± 10; BD, 51 ± 11; DCD, 66 ± 13). tCF-DNA levels were significantly increased in patients with DGF after KTx (DGF, 139 ± 22; immediate function, 91 ± 18; P < .05). The tCF-DNA level was correlated with the duration of DGF (r = 0.5825, P < .05).ConclusionAlthough the mechanism underlying DNA release from transplanted grafts into the recipient circulation remains unclear, cell death by apoptosis or necrosis and the active secretion of the immune system may play important roles in DGF. These data suggest that monitoring tCF-DNA may help predict graft recovery after DCD-KTx.     

Higher Renal Allograft Function in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation Rather Than in Living-Related Kidney Transplantation

Objectives

To compare the clinical outcome of kidney transplantation from living-related and deceased donors.

Effect of Delayed Graft Function on the Outcome and Allograft Survival of Kidney Transplanted Patients from a Deceased Donor

BackgroundIn kidney transplantation (KT), delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant early complication observed in the first week. The study aimed to investigate the impact of DGF on the outcome, allograft, and patient survival after KT with organs from deceased donors.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted using 304 KT patients who received an organ from deceased donors from 2008 to 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups, DGF positive (DGF⁺) and DGF negative (DGF^–). The database containing the clinical, laboratory, and immunologic information of donors and recipients was statistically analyzed using the SSPS program.ResultsIn this study, 189 (62.17%) were DGF⁺ and 115 (37.83%) were DGF^–. Until 6 months after KT, the estimate glomerular filtration rate was better in group DGF^–, but it was similar between the groups during 10-year follow-up. Graft losses were higher in DGF⁺ group than in the DGF^– (P = .046). The serum creatinine level was persistently higher in DGF⁺ group until the sixth month (P ≤ .05). Allograft survival rates were better in patients who were DGF^– (P = .033). Those who had DGF for more than 15 days had a worse graft survival (P = .003), but in 10 year follow-up, patient survival rates were similar (P = .705).ConclusionDGF⁺ patients were associated with dialysis time before KT, ischemia time, and the donors’ clinical status, such as age, organ quality, and serum creatinine. All these factors had a great impact on graft survival but not on patient survival.     

Delayed Graft Function Duration in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is an important prognostic indicator after kidney transplantation. Depending on the severity of the ischemia-reperfusion injury, DGF can have several clinical presentations, with different renal function recovery times. Both the presence and duration of DGF can have an impact on kidney transplantation outcomes. However, the definition of the cutoff point, above which the outcomes are worse, varies widely in the literature.MethodsTo investigate the impact of DGF and its duration on patient and graft survivals, a single-center retrospective study including all deceased donor kidney transplants was performed between November 2008 and December 2015 (n = 188). Through the analysis on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cutoff point that determined the worst outcome was reached. DGF patients were then divided according to the duration of DGF (<8 days or ≥8 days).ResultsThe overall incidence of DGF was 62.2%. Higher HLA mismatches was an independent risk factor for prolonged DGF. DGF ≥8 days was associated with acute rejection and this one was associated with patient death in 3 years.ConclusionDGF with a duration of more than 8 days associated with higher HLA mismatches increases the risk of acute rejection, but graft loss and patient survival are not affected by DGF, regardless of its duration.     

Renal Transplantation in Obese Patients: Experience in an Argentine Center

Possible complications of renal transplants in obese patients have raised concerns among nephrologists. We describe the outcomes of 110 renal transplant patients according to body mass index (BMI). Recipient BMI was calculated by using height and weight at time of transplantation and categorized according to World Health Organization guidelines. The patients' BMI values were as follows: underweight, n = 8 (7.27%); normal weight, n = 55 (50%); overweight, n = 30 (27.27%); and obese, n = 17 (15.45%). Mean age was significantly different among groups: underweight, 27.62 ± 7.57 years; normal weight, 44.98 ± 15.55 years; overweight, 50.53 ± 13.90 years; and obese, 52.11 ± 10.41 years (P < .05). Donor age and mean time of dialysis treatment were comparable in all groups. Underweight patients had a significantly larger proportion of living donors than those with higher BMIs. Calculated glomerular filtration rate (using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation) were significantly different among the groups at 30, 60, and 90 days' posttransplantation. At 180 days, however, it was comparable: underweight, 62.96 ± 40.77 mL/min/1.73 m²; normal weight, 53.55 ± 26.23 mL/min/1.73 m²; overweight, 47.52 ± 16.37 mL/min/1.73 m²; and obese, 46.19 ± 17.56 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .34). Incidence of delayed graft function was as follows: underweight, 0%; normal weight, 30.4%; overweight, 53.3%; and obese, 64.1% (P < .05). The incidence of surgical complications, incidence of rejection within the first 6 months' posttransplantation, and graft and patient survival rates over 6 months did not differ among the groups. Because transplantation in obese patients may be associated with higher risks and costs, the evaluation of each center experience is imperative. Longer term assessments are warranted, but our short-term results show that outcomes in overweight or obese renal transplant patients are comparable to those in patients with lower BMI.     

Incidence,Risk Factors,and Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

ObjectiveDelayed graft function (DGF) is the most significant complication of a cadaveric kidney transplant. We aim to evaluate the predictable risk factors of DGF and its effects on the recipient and graft survival.MethodFrom January 2014 to December 2017, the medical records from 62 patients who received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor were retrospectively reviewed. We classified recipients into 2 groups. The risk factors of DGF associated with donor, recipient, and transplant procedures were analyzed. DGF's effects on the graft survival were examined.ResultsThe incidence rate of DGF was 43.5%. Older ages of donors, marginal donors (n = 15), length of stay in the intensive care unit, and terminal serum creatinine concentrations were observed to be statistically significant compared to recipients without DGF (P < .5). The ratio of serum creatinine concentrations before/after brain death was found to be significant for the groups with DGF (P < .05). Cold ischemia time (CIT) was examined as the most significant risk factor on DGF (P = .001). One-year patient survival rates were 94.5% and 92.3%, and graft survival rates were 92.1% and 87.5% (P = .05), respectively, for the groups with and without DGF.ConclusionOlder ages of donors, occurrence of acute kidney injury, its grade just before harvesting, and long duration of CIT are the most important risk factors for DGF. Brain death management, shortening the time between brain death and harvesting, and also shortening the duration of CIT can decrease the risk of DGF and can increase the graft survival.     

Outcome of Kidney Transplantation With Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience

AimThe aim of this study is to present the outcome of kidney transplantation after laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) compared with conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in a single-center experience.MethodsThis retrospective study compares data from the initial experience with 110 consecutive LESS DN donors and their recipients (group A) with 205 consecutive conventional LDN donors and their recipients (group B).ResultsThis study compared 110 LESS DNs completed in an 18-month period with 205 LDNs completed in the immediately preceding 42-month period. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. In groups A and B, respectively, the incidence of immediate graft function was 90% vs 91.2%, slow graft function was 9% vs 5.3%, delayed graft function was 0.9% vs 2.9%, graft loss was 0.9% vs 2.9%, and death with a functioning graft was 0.9% vs 1.5%. The mean serum creatinine levels were 1.3 ± 0.93 mg/dL vs 1.4 ± 1.2 mg/dL (P = .447), 1.1 ± 0.33 mg/dL vs 1.2 ± 0.75 mg/dL (P = .184), and 1.05 ± 0.25 mg/dL vs 1.1 ± 0.39 mg/dL (P = .224) at 7, 30, and 365 days after transplantation. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was 88 ± 18.2 vs 83 ± 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .004). The mean donor operative times in groups A and B were 175.9 ± 24.9 minutes vs 199.88 ± 37.06 minutes (P = .0001), respectively, and the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 minutes vs 3.64 ± 1.38 minutes, respectively (P = .0001). The mean body mass index, the incidence of complex vascular anatomy, and the rate of complications were the same in the 2 donor groups.ConclusionsThe outcome of kidney transplantation after LESS DN is comparable to conventional LDN. LESS DN can be employed as the primary approach for kidney donation with low donor risk and without compromising recipient outcomes.     

A prediction model of delayed graft function in deceased donor for renal transplant: a multi-center study from China

BackgroundKidneys obtained from deceased donors increase the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation. Here we investigated the influence of the risk factors of donors with DGF, and developed a donor risk scoring system for DGF prediction.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted in 1807 deceased kidney donors and 3599 recipients who received donor kidneys via transplants in 29 centers in China. We quantified DGF associations with donor clinical characteristics. A donor risk scoring system was developed and validated using an independent sample set.ResultsThe incidence of DGF from donors was 19.0%. Six of the donor characteristics analyzed, i.e., age, cause of death, history of hypertension, terminal serum creatinine, persistence of hypotension, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) time were risk factors for DGF. A 49-point scoring system of donor risk was established for DGF prediction and exhibited a superior degree of discrimination. External validation of DGF prediction revealed area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curves of 0.7552.ConclusionsOur study determined the deceased donor risk factors related to DGF after renal transplantation pertinent to the Chinese cohort. The scoring system developed here had superior diagnostic significance and consistency and can be used by clinicians to make evidence-based decisions on the quality of kidneys from deceased donors and guide renal transplantation therapy.     

Analysis of Clinical Outcomes According to the Definition of Slow Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundSlow graft function (SGF) is considered to be an intermediate state between immediate graft function (IGF) and delayed graft function (DGF). However, the criteria of SGF is still arbitrary, and the clinical outcomes of SGF are not fully understood.MethodsA total of 212 deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients were enrolled. Three schemas were adopted, which classified SGF according to the serum creatinine (Cr) level by a given postoperative day (POD). SGF was defined as Cr ≥ 3.0 mg/dL on POD5, Cr ≥ 2.5 mg/dL on POD7, and Cr ≥ 1.5 mg/dL on POD14 without dialysis in schema I, II, and III, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after transplantation, acute rejection, and graft survival were compared in each schema. Decreased renal function, defined as eGFR less than 30.0 mL/min/1.73m², was also compared.ResultsIn schema I and III, SGF had significantly lower eGFR at 3 months after transplantation compared with IGF (P < .017), and only schema III maintained the difference until 36 months after transplantation. The incidence of decreased renal function showed significant difference among groups in schema I and III (P < .05). Graft survival did not show significant difference among groups in all schemas. However, SGF and DGF groups showed a higher probability of decreased renal function than the IGF group (P < .017) in schema I and III.ConclusionsIn deceased donor kidney transplantation, certain definitions of SGF identified significantly worse clinical outcomes compared with IGF, suggesting similar impact with DGF. It is necessary to reach a consensus on a clearer definition of SGF with further studies.     

The Impact of Intraoperative Graft Blood Flow Measurement on Early Graft Function

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of intraoperative allograft vascular flow on early kidney graft function.MethodsA total of 159 patients underwent kidney transplantation from January 2017 to March 2022 at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Graft arterial and venous blood flow was measured separately with a transient time flowmeter (Transonic HT353; Transonic Systems, Inc, Ithaca, NY, United States) after ureteroneocystostomy. The early outcomes, including the postoperative creatinine level, were analyzed accordingly.ResultsThere were 83 males and 76 females, with a mean age of 44.5 years. The mean graft arterial flow measured was 480.6 mL/min, and the mean venous flow was 506.2 mL/min. Delayed graft function (DGF) incidence was 36.5%, 32.5%, and 40.8% in total, living, and deceased donor groups, respectively. Living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation were analyzed separately. In the DGF subgroup, there were lower graft venous flows, higher body mass index (BMI), and more male patients in the living kidney transplant group. Similarly, the deceased donor kidney transplantation group with delayed graft function tended to have higher body height, higher body weight, higher BMI, and more diabetes mellitus. The multivariate analysis showed that lower graft venous blood flow (odds ratio [OR] = 0.995, P = .008) and higher BMI (OR = 1.144, P = .042) were significantly correlated with delayed graft function in living donor kidney transplantations. In the deceased donor group, a multivariate analysis of risk factors showed that BMI had a significant correlation with delayed graft function (OR = 1.41, P = .039).ConclusionsGraft venous blood flow was significantly associated with delayed graft function in living donor kidney transplantation, and high BMI was correlated with DGF in all patients receiving kidney transplantation.     

Outpatient Management of Delayed Graft Function Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay Without an Increase in Adverse Events

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common and costly complication of kidney transplantation. In July 2011, we established a multidisciplinary DGF clinic managed by nurse practitioners to facilitate early discharge and intensive management of DGF in the outpatient setting. We compared length of stay, 30‐day readmission, acute rejection, and patient/graft survival in 697 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplantations performed between July 2009 and July 2014. Patients were divided into three groups: no DGF (n = 487), DGF before implementation of the DGF clinic (n = 118), and DGF clinic (n = 92). Baseline characteristics including age, gender, panel reactive antibody, retransplantation rates, HLA mismatches, induction, and maintenance immunosuppression were not significantly different between pre‐ and post‐DGF clinic groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in pre‐DGF clinic (10.9 ± 6.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1 days, p < 0.001). Thirty‐day readmission (21% vs. 16%), graft loss (7% vs. 20%), and patient death (2% vs. 11%) did not differ significantly between pre‐ and post‐DGF clinic. Patients in the DGF clinic were less likely to develop acute rejection (21% vs. 40%, p = 0.006). Outpatient management of DGF in a specialized clinic is associated with substantially shorter hospitalization and lower incidence of acute rejection without significant difference in 30‐day readmission or patient and graft survival.     

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters Associated With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Patients

PurposeIntraoperative hemodynamic instability was proven to be associated with delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. This retrospective study aims to find the specific intraoperative hemodynamic parameters as an efficient predicting factor of DGF.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2020 and 2022 were enrolled and classified into DGF and non-DGF groups. Pediatric and multiorgan recipients were excluded. Hemodynamic parameters such as central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) at the timings of wound incision, graft reperfusion, and operation completion were recorded, respectively. A comparison of parameters between these 2 groups was analyzed.ResultsWe enrolled 42 recipients, with 26 in the DGF group and 16 in the non-DGF group. Compared with the DGF group, CI around graft reperfusion was significantly higher in the non-DGF group (3.97 vs 4.67 L/min/m², P = .043). Other hemodynamic variables revealed no statistical difference. In the results of multivariate analysis, the deceased donor source, the greater volume of blood loss, and the lower CI around graft reperfusion were considered independent risk factors for DGF. Using CI around graft reperfusion to conduct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for DGF prediction, the area under the ROC curve achieved a value of 0.739 (95% confidence interval, 0.579-0.900), with the optimal cut-point value at CI = 4.245 L/min/m².ConclusionThe cardiac index value around graft reperfusion was statistically associated with the incidence of DGF and might be used as a valid predicting factor.     

Procurement Biopsies Can Predict Unfavorable Outcomes in Kidneys With Low MAPI Score Values

BackgroundThere are few reports about the usefulness of Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI) score in procurement biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between histopathological analysis according to MAPI and unfavorable outcomes in the first year after kidney transplantation (KT).MethodsThis retrospective study included deceased-donor KT patients whose grafts were biopsied before transplantation and had low MAPI scores (<8) in frozen sections (FSs). Paraffin sections (PSs) were analyzed after KT. MAPI parameters were global glomerulosclerosis in more than 15% (2 patients), periglomerular fibrosis (4 patients), wall-lumen ratio of arteries >0.5 (2 patients), arteriolar hyalinosis (4 patients), and interstitial scar (3 patients). Multivariable models were used to analyze risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF), prolonged DGF, inferior renal function, and graft loss (P < .05).ResultsOne hundred fifty-nine KTs were included. Donors (n = 120) were predominantly men (70%) and young adults (37.68 ± 12.50 years old) who suffered a traumatic death (55.8%). Recipients were predominantly men (62.26%) and adults (45.70 ± 15.80 years old) with kidney disease of unknown etiology (39.6%). Low rates of agreement between FS and PS were observed for all MAPI criteria, with kappa values ranging from 0.28 to 0.51. Using FS, no histologic parameter was independently associated with outcomes. After adjustment, glomerulosclerosis was an independent risk factor for prolonged DGF (odds ratio = 6.18: 95% confidence interval, 1.27-30.18) and wall-lumen ratio >0.5 for inferior renal function at 1 year (odds ratio = 4.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-13.76).ConclusionProcurement biopsies can be useful to predict inferior outcomes even in kidneys with low MAPI scores.     

A Novel and Personalized Rehabilitation Program for Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients

IntroductionPhysical rehabilitation programs for kidney transplant recipients are not routinely personalized to patients' physical and emotional health, which could result in a potentially limited health impact, shorter-term participation, and an overall low success rate.Materials and MethodsWe conducted an internal review board–approved randomized prospective study involving a 12-month supervised multidisciplinary rehabilitation program (GH method) initiated after kidney transplantation in obese recipients (body mass index >30). The new method incorporates 3 major components: physical exercise, behavioral interventions, and nutritional guidance. We compared 9 patients who underwent supervised rehabilitation with 8 patients who underwent standard care. Patients were followed up after the start of the intervention, and multiple assessments were performed.ResultsThe adherence to training and follow-up was 100% in the intervention group, compared with 25% at 12 months in the control group. There was a trend for a higher glomerular filtration rate in the intervention group compared with the control group (55.5 ± 18.6 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 38.8 ± 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .06). The quality of life (SF-36) mean score improved more in the intervention group compared with the control group (583 ± 13 vs 436 ± 22, P = .008). There was a significantly higher employment rate in the intervention group, 77.7% at 12 months compared with 12.5% in the control group (P = .02).ConclusionsOur preliminary results suggest that this comprehensive approach to physical rehabilitation can improve adherence, kidney function, quality of life, and employment rate for obese patients after kidney transplantation.     

The impact of long-term exposure to tacrolimus on chronic kidney disease after lung transplantation: A retrospective analysis from a single transplantation center

BackgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive and irreversible complication in lung transplant patients who have received long-term treatment with tacrolimus. This study aimed to verify long-term tacrolimus exposure values in CKD progression.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of adult lung transplant recipients performed at our center between 2012 and October 2015. Patients who completed the 5-year follow-up period were enrolled in this study. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m².ResultsEighty patients were analyzed. Compared with baseline (109 ± 38.1 mL/min/1.73 m2), the average eGFR values of our patients gradually decreased during the fifth-year post transplantation (46.5%, 58.3 ± 28.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), and the decline in eGFR values was particularly pronounced in the first year (31.2%, 74.6 ± 28.91 mL/min/1.73 m2). Moreover, 10 (12.7%), 21 (26.9%), 24 (31.2%), 28 (41.2%), and 48 (60%) patients had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² at 3, 6, 1, 3, and 5 years after lung transplantation (LT), respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between tacrolimus dose and eGFR 6 months after LT (P = 0.0414). We found no correlation between the serum tacrolimus concentration and CKD progression.ConclusioneGFR constantly decreased and the incidence of CKD increased during the 5-year follow-up period after LT. The tacrolimus dose had a significant negative correlation with eGFR at 6 months after LT. Meanwhile, whole-blood tacrolimus trough concentrations were not correlated with eGFR decline. When possible, lower dosing within 1 year after LT can reduce potential nephrotoxic side effects.     

Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using Kidney Allografts With Marginal Perfusion Parameters

BackgroundThis study examines outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) in recipients of kidney allografts with marginal perfusion parameters.MethodsAllografts with marginal perfusion parameters (resistance index [RI] >0.4 and pump flow rate [F] <70 mL/min; MP group) were compared with those with good parameters (RI <0.4 and F >70 mL/min; GP group) for DDKT recipients between January 1996 and November 2017 after hypothermic pulsatile perfusion. Demographics, creatinine, cold ischemia times (CIT), delayed graft function (DGF), and recipient glomerular filtration rate at pre- and post-transplant were noted. The primary outcome was graft survival post-transplant.ResultsIn the MP (n = 31) versus GP (n = 1281) group, the median recipient was aged 57 years versus 51 years; the median donor was aged 47 versus 37 years; terminal creatinine was 0.9 versus 0.9 mg/dL; CIT was 10.2 versus 13 hours, and the RI and flow were 0.46 and 60 mL/min versus 0.21 and 120 mL/min. The DGF rate was 19% (MP) versus 8% (GP). The graft survival in the MP versus GP group was 81% versus 90% (1 year), 65% versus 79% (3 years), 65% versus 73% (4 years), and 45% versus 68% (5 years).ConclusionCarefully selected kidney allografts after comprehensive donor and recipient evaluation may allow for the use of these routinely discarded kidneys with marginal perfusion parameters.     

Incidence,Risk Factors,and Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in a Brazilian Center

Background

A high incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation occurs in Brazil. The reasons for such have not been adequately studied.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 346 kidney transplant recipients from deceased donors. DGF risk factors related to the recipient, donor, and transplantation surgery were analyzed and correlated with graft outcomes. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors and patient and graft survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

The incidence of DGF was 70.8% (245 cases). Our final model of multivariate analysis showed that DGF is associated (P < .05) with donor final serum creatinine (relative risk [RR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–2.70), donor age (RR, 1.02 [1.0–1.033]), receiving a kidney from national offer (RR, 2.44 [1.06–5.59]), and need for antibody induction (RR, 2.87 [1.33–6.18]). Outcomes that were associated with DGF were longer length of hospital stay (32.5 ± 20.5 vs 18.8 ± 16.3 days; P = .01), higher incidence of acute rejection (37.8 vs 12.9%; P < .01), worse graft survival at 1 year (83.5% vs 93.9%; P < .01), and higher levels of serum creatinine at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < .05). There was no difference in patient survival and the occurrence of acute rejection did not influence the survival of patients or grafts.

Conclusion

DGF was associated with higher donor final serum creatinine, donor age, receiving a kidney from the national supply, and need for antibody induction. Most importantly, DGF was associated with worse outcomes.     

Dual Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

BackgroundDual and en bloc kidney transplantation are strategies used to mitigate the disparity between a reduced organ pool and an ever-increasing need for organ procurement. En bloc refers to the implantation of 2 kidneys from a pediatric donor, compensating for small renal mass, whereas dual expanded criteria donor (DECD) transplantation refers to older donors with grafts otherwise rejected for single transplant, including expanded. This study describes one center's experience with dual and en bloc transplantation.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of dual kidney transplants (en bloc and DECD) from 1990 through 2021. The analysis included demographic, clinical, and survival analysis.ResultsOf 46 patients who underwent dual kidney transplantation, 17 (37 %) received en-bloc transplantation. The overall mean recipient age was 49.4 ± 13.9 years old, younger in the en-bloc subgroup (39.2 vs 59.8 years old, P < .01). The mean time on dialysis was 37 ± 25 months. Delayed graft function was present in 17.4 % and primary nonfunction in 6.4 %, all from the DECD group. The estimated glomerular filtration rates at 1 and 5 years were 76.7 ± 28.7 and 80.4 ± 24.8 mL/min/1.73 m², lower in the DECD group (65.9 vs 88.7 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.02). Eleven recipients lost their graft during the study period: 63.6% from death with a functioning graft, 27.3% due to chronic graft dysfunction (a mean of 76.3 months after transplantation), and 9.1% due to vascular complications. Subgroup comparison found no differences regarding cold ischemia time or length of hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier estimates, censored for death with a functioning graft, resulted in a mean graft survival of 21.3 ± 1.3 years, with survival rates of 93.5, 90.5, and 84.1% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, without significant differences between subgroups.ConclusionsBoth DECD and en bloc strategies provide safe and effective options to further expand the use of otherwise rejected kidneys. Neither of the 2 techniques was superior to the other.