Left renal vein ligation for large splenorenal shunt during liver transplantation

Adequate hepatopetal portal vein blood flow is obligatory to ensure proper liver function after liver transplantation. Large collateral veins as shunts impair portal vein flow and even cause hepatofugal blood flow and portal steal syndrome. In particular, splenorenal shunts in liver transplant recipients can lead to allograft dysfunction and possible allograft loss or hepatic encephalopathy. Restoration of portal flow through left renal vein ligation (LRVL) is a treatment option, which is much easier compared to splenectomy, renoportal anastomosis and shunt closure, but bears the risk of moderate and temporary impairment of renal function. In addition, a patent portal vein is mandatory for LRVL. However, although LRVL has been reported to be an effective, safe and easy method to control portacaval shunts and increase hepatopetal flow in some studies, indications and safety are still not clear. In this review, we summarize existing studies on LRVL during liver transplantation.     

New Surgical Approach to Large Splenorenal Shunt in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Diversion of SMV and SPV Blood Flow

Introduction

The management of a large splenorenal shunt is important because it affects recipient outcome, particularly in living donor liver transplantation.

Methods

To manage large splenorenal shunts in living donor liver transplantation, we diverted superior mesenteric vein and splenic portal vein blood flow by ligation at the root of the splenic portal vein.

Result

This procedure was applied for five patients in whom superior mesenteric vein blood flow had been completely stolen by a splenorenal shunt preoperatively. Postoperative course was excellent in all cases.

Conclusion

This technique completely prevents morbidity related to large splenorenal shunts after living donor liver transplantation.     

Ligation of huge spontaneous porto-systemic collaterals to avoid portal inflow steal in adult living donor liver transplantation: A case-report

IntroductionIn adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), maintenance of adequate portal inflow is essential for the graft regeneration. Portal inflow steal (PFS) may occur due to presence of huge spontaneous porto-systemic collaterals. A surgical procedure to increase the portal inflow is rarely necessary in adult LDLT.PresentationA 52 years male patient with end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Preoperative portography showed marked attenuated portal vein and its two main branches, patent tortuous splenic vein, multiple splenic hilar collaterals, and large lieno-renal collateral. He received a right hemi-liver graft from his nephew. Exploration revealed markedly cirrhotic liver, moderate splenomegaly with multiple collaterals and large lieno-renal collateral. Upon dissection of the hepato-duodenal ligament, a well-developed portal vein could be identified with a small mural thrombus.The recipient portal vein stump was anastomosed, in end to end fashion, to the graft portal vein. Doppler US showed reduced portal vein flow, so ligation of the huge lieno-renal collateral that allows steal of the portal inflow. After ligation of the lieno-renal collateral, improvement of the portal vein flow was observed in Doppler US.DiscussionThere is no accepted algorithm for managing spontaneous lieno-renal shunts before, during, or after liver transplantation, and evidence for efficacy of treatments remains limited. We report a case of surgical interruption of spontaneous huge porto-systemic collateral to prevent PFS during adult LDLT.ConclusionComplete interruption of large collateral vessels might be needed as a part of adult LDLT procedure to avoid devastating postoperative PFS.     

Triple-phase computed tomography and intraoperative flow measurements improve the management of portosystemic shunts during liver transplantation.

Ligation of portosystemic shunts in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation has been recommended to avoid insufficient portal vein (PV) flow. Shunts are not always recognized pretransplantation because intraoperative PV flow assessment is not routinely attempted. As a result of a posttransplantation PV thrombosis in a recipient with a large portosystemic shunt and a PV flow <1 L/minute, we employed triple-phase computed tomography with vascular reconstruction and intraoperative graft flow measurement to determine the need for inflow modification in our next 16 patients with large portosystemic shunts. Subsequently, 6 patients with large portosystemic shunts and PV flows 相似文献   

Splenic artery ligation in distal splenorenal shunts

Splenic artery ligation, a simple surgical procedure expected to decrease splenic flow and portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis of the liver, was performed concomitantly with a distal splenorenal shunt procedure in six patients and as the main surgical procedure in two patients. Immediate cessation of bleeding was achieved in the four patients in whom the splenic artery was ligated to reduce intraoperative bleeding. However, three of the seven patients with previous gastroesophageal hemorrhage rebled from various postoperatively. Symptoms of splenic infarction were observed in six patients, resulting in thrombosis of the splenic vein and/or of the distal splenorenal shunt in four patients and necessitating splenectomy in one. This incidence of thrombosis of the distal splenorenal shunt is much higher than the overall incidence of 5 per cent observed at our institution. It is thus concluded that the splenic artery should not be ligated in cirrhotic patients with patent distal splenorenal shunts, since splenic arterial collateral vessels have already been reduced by the gastric devascularization, an integral component of the distal splenorenal shunt.     

Laparoscopic correction of congenital portosystemic shunt in children

Congenital portosystemic shunt is a rare clinical entity that may progress to jaundice, severe encephalopathy, and pulmonary hypertension and require surgical correction or coil embolization. We present a novel approach to the management of children with congenital portosystemic shunt by means of a minimally invasive surgical technique. Congenital portosystemic shunts were identified between the superior mesenteric vein and inferior vena cava in case 1 and between the splenic vein and left renal vein in case 2. Both of them were successfully ligated by laparoscopic approach, and catheters were subsequently replaced to monitor portal venous pressure. The patients tolerated the procedure well, and short-term results were excellent. Laparoscopic ligation of congenital portosystemic shunt is technically feasible and less invasive to the management of patients with congenital portosystemic shunts, preventing late onset, life-threatening complications.     

Renoportal anastomosis in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: report of a case

End-stage liver disease is often accompanied by thrombosis of the portal vein and the formation of splanchnic collateral vessels. Successful liver transplantation in such situations is more likely if the surgeon uses a strategy to establish a graft inflow. A 59-year-old male with a decompensated liver secondary to idiopathic portal hypertension underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft donated from his son. His portal venous trunk was atrophied and a splenorenal shunt drained the mesenteric venous flow into the systemic circulation. LDLT was performed with renoportal anastomosis (RPA) using his right internal jugular vein as an interposed venous graft, without dissecting the collateral vessels. Although he developed temporary functional hyperbilirubinemia, he was discharged from the hospital 23 days after LDLT. This case suggests that RPA is a useful technique to manage patients with an obstructed portal vein and a splenorenal shunt.     

Noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Physiology before and after shunts.

Controversy exists concerning the proper therapy for bleeding gastroesophageal varices secondary to noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Disparity of opinion exists regarding the significance of hepatic portal blood flow and the consequences of total portal-systemic shunts in this condition. One patient is presented who developed severe, crippling encephalopathy 20 years after a central splenorenal shunt. This was associated with loss of portal flow to the liver and marked nitrogen intolerance. Closure of the shunt resulted in restoration of hepatic portal flow via collateral veins (HPI 0.36), clearance of encephalopathy and return to near normal protein tolerance. An additional patient was studied with hyperammonemia and early suggestive signs of encephalopathy eight years following a mesocaval shunt. Four patients were evaluated before and after selective distal splenorenal shunts. All had "cavernous transformation" of the portal vein with angiographic evidence of portal flow to the liver. Postoperative angiograms revealed continued hepatic portal perfusion and a patent shunt in each patient. Radionuclide imaging postoperatively gave an estimated portal fraction of total hepatic blood flow (HPI) of .39 and .60 in two of the four patients. We conclude that 1) there is significant hepatic portal perfusion in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (cavernous transformation), 2) loss of this hepatic portal flow following total shunts can lead to severe encephalopathy, 3) the selective distal splenorenal shunt maintains hepatic portal perfusion and is the procedure of choice when there is a patent splenic vein and surgical intervention is indicated.     

脾腔分流术治疗小儿肝外型门脉高压症

脾肾静脉分流是治疗小儿肝外型门脉高压症的有效手段，但因肾静脉位置深、细小，增加了手术难度，影响疗效。报告我院近期采用脾腔静脉分流术式治疗３例，均为女性，年龄９￣１２岁，反复出血史６￣１０年。钡餐示重度食道静脉曲张，肝外病变由彩色超声检查证实。术中切除脾脏，测得脾静脉口径６￣９ｍｍ。将脾静脉与下腔静脉作端侧吻合，手术顺利。术后随访１２￣１８个月，２例一般情况良好，１例（脾静脉口径６ｍｍ）术后８个月时     

改良式脾肾静脉分流术临床应用

目的 探讨改良式脾肾静脉分流术治疗门静脉高压症的效果。方法 用腹主动脉前脾肾静脉端侧吻合术,（改良式脾肾静脉分流术）治疗门静脉高压症患者５２例。分别观察以前后门静脉压力变化及食道胃底静脉曲张情况,再出血、肝衰竭的发生率及吻合口的通畅情况。结果 分流后门静脉压力平均平下降１１ｃｍＨ２Ｏ,２８例（５３．８４％０患者食 底静脉曲张减轻,４例（７．６９％）患者发生再出血,６例（１１．５４％）发生肝功能衰竭     

Recurrent Portal Vein Thrombosis In Liver Transplantation With Renoportal Anastomosis Caused by Spontaneous Reno-Caval Shunts: A Case Report

BackgroundOrthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with cirrhosis complicated by portal hypertension, portosystemic shunts, and chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has long been challenging. Spontaneous spleno-renal shunts (SRS) allow new surgical techniques to restore portal vein patency and hepatopetal flow. Renoportal anastomosis (RPA) has emerged as an accepted method for transplanting these patients, with good long-term patient and graft survival. Orthotopic liver transplantation with RPA is known to be complicated by recurrent PVT, with few details discussed in the literature.Case ReportWe present a case of a 56-year-old woman with decompensated cirrhosis who underwent deceased donor whole graft OLT using RPA with iliac vein conduit. The postoperative course was complicated by occlusive thrombosis in the portal vein and iliac vein conduit. Venography revealed enlarged left gonadal and lumbar vein varices acting as reno-caval shunts with hepatofugal flow. Embolization of the varices re-established durable venous patency that was confirmed on post-transplant day 68 with no other hemodynamic complications.DiscussionThis showcases an interesting mechanism by which recurrent PVT may occur in patients undergoing OLT with RPA. Because durable portal vein patency can be achieved with Interventional Radiology embolization of reno-caval varices, assessing these communications is an important preoperative consideration for planned OLT with RPA.     

Management of Major Portosystemic Shunting in Small-for-Size Adult Living-Related Donor Liver Transplantation with a Left-Sided Graft Liver

PURPOSE: We investigated the mechanisms of small-for-size graft syndrome by time-lag ligation, a novel approach to treating major portosystemic shunts in small-for-size adult living-related donor liver transplantation (LRDLT) using left-sided graft liver. METHODS: Five patients with end-stage liver failure and major splenorenal shunting underwent LRDLT using left lobe grafts. The average graft volume to recipient body weight (GV/RBW) ratio was 0.68 +/- 0.14. Two patients underwent time-lag ligation of their splenorenal (SR) shunts on postoperative days (PODs) 8 and 14, respectively. The shunts of the other three patients were untreated. RESULTS: The portal pressures in the first patient who underwent time-lag ligation rose above 300 mmH(2)O and remained there for 2 weeks. Thus, we ligated the SR shunt in the second patient on POD 14, resulting in an increase from 177 mmH(2)O to 258 mmH(2)O, but it decreased again thereafter. In the other three patients, the SR shunt was not ligated because portal blood flow volumes remained sufficient. Total bilirubin levels in the first time-lag ligation patient rose to 16 mg/dl, paralleling the rise in portal pressures. Although they increased after ligation in the second patient, they did not exceed 10 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend time-lag ligation if portal venous blood flow decreases in the early post-transplant period, but not until at least 2 weeks after transplantation. If the portal venous blood flow does not decrease, early postoperative ligation is unnecessary. If there are no major portosystemic shunts, making a portosystemic shunt might decompress excessive portal hypertension. With donor safety priority in LRDLT, novel approaches must be developed to enable the use of smaller donor grafts. We describe a potential means of using left lobe grafts in adult LRDLT.     

Temporary intraoperative porto‐caval shunt: useless or beneficial in piggy back liver transplantation?

The role of intraoperative porto‐caval shunts in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is controversial. Aim of this study was to analyze the effects of an intraoperative, porto‐caval catheter‐shunt on graft function and survival following cava sparing OLT. Four hundred and forty‐eight piggy back liver transplantations with or without a temporary spontaneous porto‐caval shunt between 1997 and 2010 were analyzed (shunt n = 274 vs. no shunt n = 174). Lab MELD scores and donor risk indices (DRI) were calculated. Hepatic injury (ALT, AST), ‐function (bilirubin, prothrombin ratio), postreperfusion liver blood flow and graft survival were registered [mean follow‐up: 50.5 (0–163.0) months]. The impact of a shunt on graft survival was determined using multivariate analysis. Usage of a porto‐caval shunt was associated with reduced hepatic injury (ALT, AST), whereas graft function was not affected. The shunt group showed a significantly increased portal venous blood flow after reperfusion. Retransplantation rate was decreased (7.7% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.001) and long‐term graft survival was significantly increased with a porto‐caval shunt (hazard ratio 2.1, P < 0.001). This effect was even more pronounced for marginal organs. Usage of intraoperative porto‐caval catheter‐shunts is beneficial in cava sparing OLT and is associated with reduced ischemia‐reperfusion injury and improved organ survival in particular for recipients of marginal organs.     

Distal splenorenal shunt in children.

The distal splenorenal end-to-side anastomosis (Warren shunt) decompresses esophageal varices while maintaining high portal hypertension and avoiding reduction of portal venous blood inflow to the liver. The Warren shunt was performed in seven consecutive patients with portal hypertension, including post-necrotic cirrhosis, portal thrombosis, and schistosomiasis, all with recurrent esophageal bleeding. Five shunts remained patent and two thrombosed. There was no mortality. If long-term follow-up evaluations indicate its effectiveness in preventing esophageal hemorrhage, the distal selective splenorenal shunt would be the more physiologic and safer procedure in children with portal hypertension.     

Left Renal Vein Ligation: A Technique to Mitigate Low Portal Flow from Splenic Vein Siphon during Liver Transplantation

Low portal vein flows in liver transplant have been associated with poor allograft survival. Identifying and ameliorating causes of inadequate portal flow is paramount. We describe successful reversal of significant splenic vein siphon from a spontaneous splenorenal shunt during liver transplant. The patient is a 43‐year‐old male with cirrhosis from hepatitis C and Budd–Chiari syndrome, who had a variceal hemorrhage necessitating an emergent splenorenal shunt with 8 mm PTFE graft. Imaging in 2006 revealed thrombosis of the splenorenal shunt and evidence of a new spontaneous splenorenal shunt. The patient developed hepatocellular carcinoma and underwent transplant in 2009. After reperfusion, portal flows were low (150–200 mL/min). A mesenteric varix was ligated without improvement. Due to adhesions, direct collateral ligation was not attempted. In order to redirect the splenic siphon, the left renal vein was stapled at its confluence with the inferior vena cava. Portal flows subsequently increased to 1.28 L/min. Postoperatively, the patient had stable renal and liver function. We conclude that spontaneous splenorenal shunts can cause low portal flows. A diligent search for shunts with understanding of flow patterns is critical; ligation or rerouting of splanchnic flow may be necessary to improve portal flows and allograft outcomes.     

A shunt equation for estimating the splenic component of portal hypertension

A modification of the Berggren pulmonary shunt equation was derived for use in estimating the splenic component of portal hypertension. It was used in nine patients, six of whom had sufficient decreases in portal flow and pressure after splenic artery and coronary vein ligation. The average decrease in portal flow was 52%.     

Liver transplantation in patients with previous portasystemic shunt

Over a 9-year period, 58 patients who had previous portasystemic shunt procedures underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) under a cyclosporine-steroid immunosuppressive regimen. The types of shunt used were distal splenorenal (18 patients), mesocaval (17 patients), end-to-side portacaval (11 patients), side-to-side portacaval (5 patients) and proximal splenorenal (7 patients). The mean interval between shunt and transplantation was 6 years. There was no statistical difference in survival between patients with previous shunts and the entire population of patients with primary liver transplantation performed during the same period of time. Age, sex, shunt patency, status of portal vein, and use of vein or artery graft did not affect survival. Child's classification had a significant influence on graft survival, even though no difference was subsequently observed in patient survival. A progressively improved intraoperative strategy and the use of veno-venous bypass and University of Wisconsin preservation solution had a significant impact on blood loss, length of operation, length of stay in intensive care unit, and ultimately, on survival. Distal splenorenal and mesocaval shunts with no or minimal hilum dissection are safer shunts if subsequent transplantation is planned; in fact, their 9-year survival was 87%, whereas all other shunts were associated with a survival no better than 52% (p less than 0.006).     

Portosystemic Shunt in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplant

BackgroundTo evaluate the significance of portosystemic shunts and associated long-term outcomes in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) among pediatric patients.MethodsRetrospective review of 121 pediatric patients who underwent LDLT between May 1994 and December 2015 at Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography images of the liver were reviewed, and portal vein complications were assessed.ResultsNinety-seven pediatric patients were included in the study, and 70 had portosystemic shunts before transplant. Thirty-three patients have portal systemic shunt (PSS) 6 months after transplant (mean [SD] shunt size, 4.59 [1.98] mm). Thirty-seven patients’ portosystemic shunts closed spontaneously (mean [SD] shunt size, 3.14 [1.06] mm). Smaller PSSs tend to close spontaneously with a cutoff point of 3.35 mm by receiver operating characteristic curve (P = .01). Patients with PSS have more portal vein complications than those without PSS (44.3% vs 11.1%, P = .02). Among PSS recipients, patients with portal vein complications tend to have larger PSS size (mean [SD], 4.14 [1.96] mm vs 3.59 [1.48] mm), although the difference is not statistically significant (P = .19).ConclusionsIn pediatric patients, preoperative portosystemic shunts are significantly correlated with portal venous complications, some of which require minimal interventions after LDLT with good outcomes. Shunts larger than 3.35 mm tend to persist after transplant with increased portal venous complications.     

肝硬变腹水患者门腔静脉分流术后肾素活性,血管紧张素转换酶？…

目的 探讨肝硬变腹水患者行门腔静脉分流术前后肾素活性（ＰＲＡ）、血管紧张素转换酶（ＡＣＥ）、血管紧张素Ⅱ水平及门静脉压力（ＰＶＰ）的变化。方法 应用光度比色 放射免疫分析法,对１６例肝硬变合并腹水的患者行门腔静脉分流术前后和１６例行胃肠道肿瘤切除手术的且患者,手前后的门静脉、外周静脉和动脉血中的ＰＲＡ、ＡＣＥ、ＡⅡ及ＰＶＰ进行了测定。结果 肝硬变组门腔静脉分流前后的ＰＢＡ、ＡＣＥ、ＡⅡ及ＰＶＰ显著     

Modeling splanchnic hemodynamics after distal splenorenal shunt: a computer simulation and sensitivity analysis

The distal splenorenal shunt operation was specifically designed to preserve portal flow and maintain elevated portal pressure. However, although this goal is met in the immediate postoperative period, flow decreases over time, and in as many as 75% of alcoholic patients, portal flow is lost in the first year. Various explanations have been offered for this observation, and modifications of the original operation have been proposed (splenopancreatic disconnection). Although other portacaval shunts have been successfully modeled as electrical circuits, this approach has never been described for the distal splenorenal shunt. In this study we developed a computer program that modeled the distal splenorenal shunt as an electrical circuit. We performed an analysis to determine the sensitivity of portal flow to changes in each resistance element and then performed a series of simulation experiments to critically examine the various explanations offered for the gradual changes in hepatic hemodynamics. We found that portal flow was most sensitive to resistance in the renal vein followed by resistance in the anastomosis. The simulation experiments suggested a new alternative to splenopancreatic disconnection--restricting the ability of the splenic vein, anastomosis, or renal vein to dilate. Additional clinical studies will be needed to test these predictions.