Efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials

Rationale: Several randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) thus allowing for a meta‐analysis to determine the overall treatment effect. Methods: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases up to 31 October, 2007 was carried out. Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of MFNS in patients with AR compared to placebo were included. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), individual nasal symptoms, total non‐nasal symptom scores (TNNSS) and nasal airflow were analysed as the standardized mean difference (SMD). Meta‐analysis was performed with the random or the fixed effect models depending on heterogeneity, by using revman 5 software. Data synthesis: Sixteen of the 113 identified articles met the inclusion criteria. For MFNS efficacy on TNSS, 2998 participants were analysed: 1534 received MFNS and 1464 placebo. Mometasone furoate nasal spray was associated with a significant reduction in TNSS (SMD ?0.49, 95% CI: ?0.60 to ?0.38; P < 0.00001; I² = 50.1%). A significant effect on SMD for nasal stuffiness/congestion (?0.41; 95% CI: ?0.56 to ?0.27), rhinorrhoea (?0.44; 95% CI: ?0.66 to ?0.21), sneezing (?0.40; 95% CI: ?0.57 to ?0.23) and nasal itching (?0.39; 95% CI: ?0.53 to ?0.25) was also demonstrated. Mometasone furoate nasal spray treated subjects also showed a significant reduction in TNNSS (?0.30; 95% CI: ?0.43 to ?0.18). The proportion of patients with adverse events was similar for MFNS and placebo (0.99; 95% CI: 0.81–1.20; P = 0.91). Conclusions: This meta‐analysis provides a level Ia evidence for the efficacy of MFSN in the treatment of AR vs placebo. Adverse events frequency was similar in both groups.     

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

In a double-blind study involving 205 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, statistically significantly greater symptomatic improvements were evident following the administration of 200 micrograms/day triamcinolone acetonide aerosol than following placebo. These improvements were evident as early as week 1 and were sustained throughout the 12-week study. They were accompanied by greater reductions in nasal eosinophils. Triamcinolone acetonide aerosol was well tolerated and had no effect on serum cortisol levels.     

Once daily fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is an effective treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis

A multicenter double-blind, randomized, parallel group study was conducted to evaluate the once daily administration of fluticasone propionate, a potent, new corticosteroid preparation, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Adult patients (n = 227) were treated for 2 weeks with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms QD or 100 micrograms BID or matching placebo during the autumn pollen season. Overall, the administration of fluticasone propionate once daily in the morning was as effective as the twice daily dosage regimen, and either regimen was more effective than placebo. Improvement in clinician-rated and patient-rated nasal symptom scores, including morning nasal obstruction, was evident within three days of fluticasone propionate therapy and continued throughout the treatment period. Fewer patients receiving fluticasone propionate used rescue medication and had nasal eosinophilia compared with patients receiving placebo. Adverse events were similar in frequency and nature in all three treatment groups. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations and response to cosyntropin stimulation were similar across groups and offered no evidence of HPA axis suppression. We conclude that fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray administered once daily is a safe and effective treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis. The convenience of a once daily regimen may encourage better compliance.     

Once daily triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray is effective for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted in 11 centers to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a once-a-day regimen of 110 micrograms, 220 micrograms; and 440 micrograms of triamcinolone acetonide intranasal aerosol versus placebo in relieving the symptoms of rhinitis in 305 adult and older pediatric patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Nasal stuffiness, nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal itching and the nasal index (the sum of the mean scores of the first three symptoms) averaged over the first 6 weeks and second 6 weeks of the study were significantly reduced in patients who received the 220 micrograms/day and the 440 micrograms/day dosages. The 110 micrograms/day group had a reduction in these nasal symptoms, but only the sneezing and nasal index were significantly (P less than .05) better than placebo. During the last 6 weeks of the study, patients were allowed to take oral back-up medication for their nasal symptoms; all three groups receiving triamcinolone nasal aerosol took less back-up medication than did the placebo group. There were no significant adverse effects or laboratory abnormalities noted during this study. Intranasal triamcinolone acetonide 220 micrograms and 440 micrograms, used once-a-day for 12 weeks is clinically and statistically superior to placebo for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.     

Ineffectiveness of kallikrein in treatment of idiopathic male infertility: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

In order to clarify the potential of kallikrein for treatmentof idiopathic male infertility, a double-blind, randomized,placebo-controlled study was performed. A total of 44 patientswere treated with 600 IU/day kallikrein and 47 patients withplacebo for 12 weeks. Following two basal investigations, controlexaminations were performed at 6 and 12 weeks and included conventionaland computer-aided semen analysis, hormone measurements andevalution of drug safety. No significant changes in sperm concentration,normal sperm morphology and sperm motility evaluated by conventionalanalysis were detected. Computer-aided semen analysis revealeda significant increase in average path velocity and lateralhead displacement of spermatozoa only in the placebo group.Within the observation period of 6 months four pregnancies occurredin each group. In conclusion, kallikrein treatment at a doseof 600 IU/day leads neither to an improvement of semen variablesnor does it increase the pregnancy rate of the female partners,and is therefore not suited for therapy of idiopathic male infertility.     

A 300 IR sublingual tablet is an effective,safe treatment for house dust mite–induced allergic rhinitis: An international,double-blind,placebo-controlled,randomized phase III clinical trial

1. Download : Download high-res image (382KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Concomitant montelukast and loratadine as treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Nasal challenge studies have suggested histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important proinflammatory mediators in allergic rhinitis. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, administered alone or concomitantly with loratadine, an H(1)-receptor antagonist, in seasonal allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of concomitant use of montelukast and loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In this multicenter (N = 12) double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled 2-week trial, 460 men and women, aged 15 to 75 years, with spring seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomly allocated to receive 1 of the following 5 treatments: montelukast 10 or 20 mg, loratadine 10 mg, montelukast 10 mg with loratadine 10 mg, or placebo, once daily in the evening. The primary end point was daytime nasal symptoms score (average of congestion, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing). Other end points were eye symptoms, nighttime symptoms, individual daytime nasal symptoms, global evaluations (patient's and physician's), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores. RESULTS: Concomitant montelukast with loratadine improved the primary end point significantly (P <.001) compared with placebo and each agent alone. Compared with placebo, montelukast with loratadine also significantly improved eye symptoms, nighttime symptoms, individual daytime nasal symptoms, global evaluations, and quality of life. Montelukast alone and loratadine alone caused modest improvements in rhinitis end points. All treatments were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant montelukast with loratadine provided effective treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis and associated eye symptoms with a safety profile comparable with placebo.     

Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone for treatment of male idiopathic infertility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

To examine the role of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (rhFSH) in male idiopathic infertility a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed. Of 211 patients screened, 67 were finally included. After two pre-examinations, patients were randomized and treated for 12 weeks, either with 150 IU rhFSH or with placebo. Examinations (physical examination, scrotal ultrasonography, semen analysis, hormone measurements, and in 31 patients electron microscopy (EM) of spermatozoa were performed 6 and 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 and 12 weeks after completion of treatment. Pregnancies were recorded for a further 3 months after the last examination. Of the 67 patients included in the study, 34 treated and 31 placebo patients could be analysed. In the treated group, FSH was elevated compared to baseline values (P < 0.001). At the end of treatment testicular volume in the treated group was increased compared to placebo (P < 0.05) and baseline (P < 0.001). Apart from an increase in sperm motility (P < 0.05) in the placebo group and in sperm DNA condensation (P < 0.001) in the treated group no significant changes were observed in semen parameters. Two spontaneous pregnancies in partners of men in the treated group and none in the placebo group occurred. However, two pregnancies occurred in partners of men in the placebo group induced by intrauterine insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In conclusion, at the chosen dose and duration, rhFSH did not lead to an improvement of conventional or EM sperm parameters nor to an increase in pregnancy rates. However, the increased testicular volume and sperm DNA condensation give reason for further investigations.      

Montelukast for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the spring

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes are important proinflammatory mediators believed to have a role in allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, for treating patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: After a 3- to 5-day, single-blind placebo run-in period, 1302 male and female patients (aged 15-81 years) with active allergic rhinitis symptoms were randomly assigned to receive montelukast 10 mg (n = 348), loratadine 10 mg (n = 602), or placebo (n = 352) administered once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks during the spring allergy season. RESULTS: Mean patient characteristics and symptom scores at baseline were similar for the three treatment groups. The primary end-point, daytime nasal symptoms score (mean of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, and sneezing scores; 0-3 scale), improved from baseline during treatment by (least squares mean, 95% confidence interval) - 0.37 (- 0.43, - 0.31), - 0.47 (- 0.52, - 0.43), and - 0.24 (- 0.29, - 0.18) in the montelukast, loratadine, and placebo groups, respectively (P < or = 0.001 comparing each active treatment with placebo). Mean changes from baseline in all other diary-based scores, including night-time and eye symptom scores, were significantly greater for each active treatment than for placebo. The rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life overall score improved significantly with montelukast and with loratadine as compared with placebo. Montelukast and loratadine showed a safety profile comparable to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: Montelukast is well tolerated and provides improvements in daytime and night-time symptoms, as well as quality of life parameters, for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Once-daily fexofenadine treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) can have a profound effect on patients' health and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 180 mg, on CIU. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study consisted of a placebo run-in period followed by a 4-week treatment period. Patients 12 years and older with active CIU were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily fexofenadine, 180 mg, or placebo. The primary end points were change from baseline in mean daily number of wheals (MNW score) and mean daily severity of pruritus during treatment. Secondary efficacy measures included modified total symptom scores and MNW and pruritus severity scores evaluated weekly and instantaneously at trough drug levels. RESULTS: Patients administered fexofenadine (n = 163) experienced significantly greater improvements in MNW and pruritus severity scores compared with the placebo group (n = 92) (P < .001 for both). Similarly, throughout treatment and at each individual week, the mean reductions in modified total symptom scores were significantly greater in the fexofenadine group (P < or = .005 for all comparisons vs placebo). The mean reductions in instantaneous MNW and pruritus severity scores were greater in patients in the fexofenadine group than in those who received placebo (MNW score: P = .015; pruritus severity score: P < .001). There were no significant differences in the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 180 mg, offered effective, well-tolerated relief for the management of CIU.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) and fluoxetine for the treatment of depression

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine XR with that of fluoxetine in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in depressed outpatients. METHODS: Outpatients, 18 years and older, who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were included (n = 301 randomized; 232 completed). Patients were randomly assigned to eight weeks of treatment with either venlafaxine XR 75-225 mg/day (n = 100), fluoxetine 20-60 mg/day (n = 103), or placebo (n = 98). The primary efficacy outcome measures were the final ratings on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21) total score, HAM-D21 depressed mood item, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score, and Clinical Global Impressions Scale. RESULTS: Withdrawal from the study due to adverse events occurred in 6% of the patients in the venlafaxine XR group and 9% of the patients in the fluoxetine group. Patients treated with venlafaxine XR, but only rarely those treated with fluoxetine, had statistically significant improvements in their depression ratings compared with placebo at the end of the study. The percentages of patients who achieved full remission of their depression (HAM-D21 total score < or = 7) at the end of treatment were 37%, 22% and 18% for the venlafaxine XR, fluoxetine and placebo groups, respectively. The differences in remission rates between venlafaxine XR and the other groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The superior remission outcome observed with venlafaxine XR treatment needs to be replicated in additional studies. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine XR is a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment for depression. The results of this study suggest that venlafaxine XR is as well-tolerated as fluoxetine but may have some efficacy advantages over fluoxetine.     

The SQ tree SLIT-tablet is highly effective and well tolerated: Results from a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled phase III trial

1. Download high-res image (179KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Once-daily mometasone furcate aqueous nasal spray (Nasonex™) in seasonal allergic rhinitis: an active- and placebo-controlled study

Mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (Nasonex™) was compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous nasal spray in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, parallel-group study of adults with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis. Patients allergic to at least one tree and/or grass aeroallergen received one of the following regimens for up to 4 weeks: mometasone furoate 100 μg once daily [OD] ( n = 126) or 200 μg OD ( n = 126), BDP 200 μg twice daily ( n = 126), or only placebo spray ( n = 123). Physician-rated nasal and total symptom scores, and global evaluation of overall condition and therapeutic response by physicians and patients, showed that the three active treatments were equally effective, and all three were significantly superior to placebo at most time points. Overall, mometasone furoate 200 μg OD demonstrated somewhat greater numerical, but not statistical, superiority to mometasone furoate 100 μg OD at the earliest evaluation time point. At the end of treatment, complete or marked relief was obtained in 77% of patients with mometasone furoate 100 μg/day, 79% with mometasone furoate 200 μg/day, and 74% with BDP, compared with 54% of placebo vehicle control patients. Mometasone furoate and BDP were equally well tolerated. It was concluded that mometasone furoate adequately controls symptoms of moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis, offers the advantage of OD treatment, and is well tolerated.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized study of loratadine (Clarityne) syrup for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children aged 3 to 12 years

Allergic rhinitis is a common disease in children, and antihistamines are the key medication. However, traditional tablets are not convenient and lead to low compliance in young children. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, randomized study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of loratadine syrup for the treatment of children aged 3 to 12 years with allergic rhinitis. Sixty children with allergic rhinitis due to dust mites were enrolled. They were randomized into 2 parallel groups: one group received loratadine syrup 5 mg or 10 mg daily for 3 weeks, and the other group received placebo. The patients returned to special clinics for symptoms evaluation at day 7 and day 21, and the parents were requested to record disease severity daily. Both evaluations, physician's and parents', were recorded with a 4-point scale for 5 symptoms: sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching and ocular symptoms. Forty-six patients completed the study, 22 in the loratadine group and 24 in the placebo group. At the initial visit, the total symptom score (TSS) in both groups was not significantly different (p = 0.39). The TSS of the loratadine syrup group at day 7 and day 21 was lower than those of the placebo group (p = 0.003, p = 0.06). The daily card scores in the experimental group were also significantly lower than those of the placebo group (week 1, p = 0.014; week 2, p = 0.029; week 3, p = 0.014). No adverse reactions were recorded in both groups. This study revealed that loratadine syrup 5 mg or 10 mg once a day improved symptom scores of children with allergic rhinitis effectively and safely.     

阿坎酸治疗酒依赖的12周多中心随机双盲对照研究

目的:评价阿坎酸治疗酒依赖的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心临床试验设计。研究对象是符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-IV)酒依赖诊断标准的门诊或者住院患者。共入组230例,一组(n=116)用阿坎酸(体质量60 kg,1332 mg/d;≥60kg,1998 mg/d)治疗,另一组(n=114)接受安慰剂治疗,连续治疗12周。以累计戒酒天数(CAD)与校正累积戒酒持续时间(CCAD)、每次访视的复饮率、首次复饮时间作为评价疗效的主要指标。以饮酒次数、饮酒量、可视渴求量表评分、血γ-谷氨酰转移酶水平为评价疗效的次要指标。根据生命体征、实验室及心电图检查、不良事件报告评价安全性。结果:阿坎酸组与安慰剂组在累计戒酒天数[(43.7±34.7)d vs.(38.9±35.8)d]、校正累积戒酒持续时间[(52.0±41.3)%vs.(46.3±42.6)%]、每次访视的复饮率以及首次复饮时间分布等主要疗效评价指标均无统计学差异(均P0.05)。但在治疗12周后,阿坎酸组患者饮酒量的等级为戒除和小于5标准杯/d的比例(88.1%vs.78.7%)高于安慰剂组,可视渴求量表分[(2.6±2.3)vs.(3.3±2.9)]低于安慰剂组(均P0.05)。阿坎酸组和安慰剂组的不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(22.6%vs.19.3%,P0.05)。阿坎酸组最常见的不良反应是腹泻和皮疹,与安慰剂组相比腹泻发生率(4.9%vs.3.2%)和皮疹发生率(3.9%vs.2.1%)无统计学差异(均P0.05)。结论:阿坎酸对减少酒依赖患者饮酒量、降低渴求等方面的疗效优于安慰剂,并且安全性良好。