Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars restored with different dentin replacement materials

ObjectivesThe aim was to investigate the fatigue performance of endodontically treated (ET) molars restored by various dentin-replacing materials and material configurations. Moreover, the impact of additional adhesive treatment with glass-ionomer cement (GIC) was evaluated.Methods250 intact molars were collected and randomly distributed into ten groups (n = 25). After endodontic procedure standard Class I cavities were prepared and restored with different direct restorative techniques and dentin-replacing materials. Two-group were restored with either packable or flowable short fiber-reinforced composites (SFRCs). Two-group were restored by experimental fiber-reinforced GIC with and without adhesive treatment. Four-group were restored by conventional and resin-modified GICs with or without adhesive treatment. One-group was restored with a dual-cure composite resin and last group was restored with only conventional composite resin (control). Fatigue-survival was measured for all specimens using a cyclic-loading machine until fracture occurred or a number of 40.000 cycles were achieved. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was conducted, followed by pairwise log-rank post hoc comparisons. Fracture mode was then examined by means of optical microscopy and SEM.ResultsGroup restored with flowable SFRC showed significantly higher survival (p < 0.05) compared to all of the groups, except for group restored with packable SFRC (p > 0.05). Group restored with fiber-reinforced GIC had significantly (p < 0.05) higher survival rates compared to other commercial GICs. SEM demonstrated change of the fracture line when fracture reached the SFRC layer.SignificanceDirect restoration of Class I in ET molars with the use of SFRCs as dentin-replacing materials demonstrated its ability to reinforce the dental structures and to increase the fatigue resistance in this specific clinical situation.     

Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques

AIM: To compare the cusp fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resins and two post systems. METHODOLOGY: Eighty extracted single-rooted human maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to eight groups (n = 10). Group 1 (control) did not receive any preparation. From groups 2 to 8, the teeth were root filled and mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. Group 2 remained unrestored. Group 3 was restored with packable resin composite using a single-step adhesive. Group 4 was restored with packable resin composite using a single-step adhesive and a thin layer of flowable resin composite. Group 5 was restored with packable resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. Group 6 was restored with ormocer resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. Group 7 was restored with an endodontic glass fibre post and hybrid resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. Group 8 was restored with an endodontic zirconium post and hybrid resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. The teeth were then mounted in a universal testing machine, the buccal cusp loaded (30 degrees ) until fracture, and the data analysed statistically. RESULTS: Group 1 had the greatest fracture resistance, and group 2 the poorest. Groups 5-8 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) fracture resistance than groups 3 and 4. No significant differences were found between groups 3 and 4, or amongst groups 5-8 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For root filled maxillary premolars with MOD cavities, adhesive resin composite restorations, with and without glass and zirconium posts, increased the fracture resistance of the buccal cuSPS. A total-etch two-step adhesive increased significantly fracture resistance more than a one-step adhesive. For the one-step adhesive, an additional layer of flowable resin composite did not enhance fracture resistance.     

Evaluation of fracture resistance of pulpotomized second primary molars restored with fiber-reinforced composite

ObjectivesFiber reinforcement of composite restorations can help decrease the fracture risk in restored pulpotomized teeth with severe coronal lesions.This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of pulpotomized second primary molars restored with fiber-reinforced composite (FRC).MethodsThis experimental study was done on 40 extracted primary second molars in four groups (n = 10). The negative controls were intact untreated teeth; while, other samples were pulpotomized with the mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) access cavities prepared on their buccal and lingual surfaces. Positive control group was left unrestored. Composite group received glass ionomer on Zonalin and was restored with flowable composite and then composite. The FRC group received glass ionomer as the preceding group; the glass fiber was embedded within flowable composite, and the cavity was restored with composite. The compressive forces leading to fracture were recorded in Newton. Comparisons were made through one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05).ResultsThe highest mean fracture resistance belonged to the intact teeth (604.45 ± 59.02 N), then the FRC group (584.31 ± 57.18 N). Unrestored teeth had the lowest fracture resistance (235.60 ± 45.60 N); however, they were not significantly different from composite group in this regard (P = 0.47). Although FRC group had significantly higher fracture resistance than the unrestored and composite group, it was not significantly different from intact teeth.ConclusionsFiber reinforcement improved the fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molar with large MOD cavities.     

Effect of eccentric load cycling on microleakage of Class V flowable and packable composite resin restorations.

Class V composite restorations are subject to the stresses that induce non-carious cervical lesions. This study evaluated the effect of eccentric oblique load on microleakage of restorations. Class V cavities were randomly prepared on the buccal surfaces of 40 recently extracted premolars and restored with composite resin according to manufacturers' directions. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups with 10 teeth per group: (1) flowable resin (Revolution) without load cycling; (2) packable resin (Prodigy Condensable) without load cycling; (3) flowable resin with load cycling (200,000 cycles) and (4) packable resin with load cycling (200,000 cycles). All teeth were then immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours after thermocycling (500 cycles). Dye penetration was measured (scores 0-3). The results indicated that adding load cycling significantly increased microleakage (p < 0.05). No significant differences in microleakage were observed for flowable resin vs packable resin. Gingival margins had significantly more microleakage (p < 0.05) than occlusal margins.     

三种方式修复严重缺损的上颌中切牙抗折性能研究

目的：比较三种方式修复严重缺损的上颌中切牙的抗折性能,探讨保存残根残冠更合理的修复方式。方法：36颗上颌中切牙随机分为3组,根管治疗后平齐唇侧釉牙本质界垂直与牙体长轴截冠。分别行铸造镍铬合金桩核、铸造镍铬合金桩树脂核及玻璃纤维桩树脂核＋金属全冠修复。在万能测试机进行力学测试,记录最大载荷和断裂模式。结果：3组的抗折强度分别为292.06±155.51N、439.89±89.55N和284.98±133.56N,铸造镍铬合金桩树脂核组明显高于另外2组,差异具有统计学意义。铸造镍铬合金桩均导致牙根垂直折裂,玻璃纤维桩10颗桩折,2颗桩折合并唇侧颈1/3折裂。结论：无箍作用时应充分利用树脂与牙体的粘结作用,高强度的铸造镍铬合金桩较玻璃纤维桩能更好地抵抗外力,结合高强度的树脂核强度更大。     

冠折年轻恒牙根管治疗后不同修复方法的抗折强度研究

目的:对比不同修复方法的根管治疗后的冠折年轻恒牙的抗折强度差异.方法:选择30颗牙体完好的单根管的下颌第一前磨牙,经根管治疗后,随机分成6组:A组不截冠为对照组,其余五组沿着牙冠各轴面水平向中线的连线进行截冠;B组采用聚合瓷贴面修复;C组直接树脂修复;D组预成玻璃纤维桩+树脂修复;E组预成玻璃纤维桩十树脂核十聚合瓷冠修...     

Structural integrity of extracted teeth restored using three different post-and-core systems: An in vitro comparative study

AimThe objective of the study was to assess the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored using different post-and-core materials.Materials and methodsExtracted human mandibular premolars (n = 36) were extracted teeth and equally distributed into four (4) treatment groups: cast metal post-and-core, milled zirconia post-and-core, pre-fabricated post with composite resin core and control group. These samples were then each subjected to the load to fracture test using a universal testing machine. Fracture resistance data were compared among groups by analysis of variance and Fisher’s exact test.ResultsThe highest mean fracture resistance value was observed in the zirconia post-and-core treatment group (1567.26 ± 317.66 N), followed by the cast metal (1355.92 ± 621.56 N) and lastly the pre-fabricated post with composite resin core (725.67 ± 251.05 N) treatment group. Differences among groups were not statistically significantly different (P = 3.77).ConclusionEndodontically treated mandibular premolars with a zirconia post-and-core system exhibited the highest robustness against structural failure based on its mean fracture resistance value. In addition, extracted teeth restored with cast post-and-core resisted a greater stress load than those restored with fiber-reinforced posts. Zirconia showed a more favorable fracture mode than the other restorations.     

Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and tooth-colored restorative materials

This study evaluated the microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated dowels and tooth-colored restoratives (Solitaire, Surefil, Filtek P60, Admira, Z-100) as core materials with and without the use of a flowable composite liner. A total of 200 extracted premolars were endodontically treated and prepared for post-core restorations. Prefabricated posts were inserted and cemented with resin cement into the root canals. Each resin system included the corresponding bonding agent for each respective flowable composite. For each group, half of the teeth were restored with composite alone, while the others were restored with the composite lined with flowable liner. Teeth were thermocycled for 1,000 cycles between 5 and 55 degrees C using a 30-second dwell time. The teeth were then coated with nail polish, placed in 5% methylene blue for 24 hours, sectioned, and scored for microleakage. Flowable liners reduced microleakage. Z-100 both with and without flowable liner demonstrated better resistance to leakage. Solitaire, Admira, and Filtek P60 showed more leakage than the other materials.     

In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber reinforced composite (FRC) cusp-replacing restorations in premolars. METHODS: Forty-five extracted sound upper premolars were randomly divided into three groups. Identical MOD cavities with simulated buccal cusp fracture and height reduction of the palatal cusp were prepared. In Group A two layers of resin impregnated woven continuous FRC (EverStick Net) were applied. In Group B one layer of unidirectional continuous FRC (EverStick) was used. In Group C no fibers were applied (control). Subsequently, all teeth were restored with resin composite (Clearfil Photo Posterior), subjected to thermocycling (6000 x 5-55 degrees C) and static load tests. Load until fracture was registered for each tooth. Simultaneously, fracture propagation was monitored using acoustic emission analysis (AE). Failure modes were visually assessed. RESULTS: Weibull analysis revealed a characteristic strength and Weibull modulus (m) at 2364.8 N for Group A (m=8.9), 2437.9 N for Group B (m=5.9) and 2160.3N for Group C (m=13.6). Fracture loads were not significantly different (ANOVA, p>0.05). Teeth with FRC showed less fractures below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) (38% and 23% for Groups A and B, respectively) than teeth without FRC (93%) (chi-square, p<0.05). The control group showed the least AE energy signals. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that glass FRC does not increase fracture load of premolars with cusp-replacing restorations. However, FRC has a beneficial effect on the failure mode. Woven fibers give more consistent results than unidirectional fibers.     

Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners

The use of flowable composites as liners in Class II packable composites has been suggested by some manufacturers. However, the contributions of this technique are unproven. This study evaluated marginal microleakage in Class II packable composite restorations with and without the use of a flowable composite liner. A conventional microhybrid composite was used as a control. Microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins of Class II cavities was evaluated using 45Ca and autoradiographs. Fifty non-carious, restoration-free human molar teeth were used. Separate mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal Class II cavity preparations were made in each tooth. Gingival margins of all cavities were placed 1 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Four Packable composites (Alert, Surefil, Pyramid and Solitaire) and one conventional microhybrid composite (Renew) with their respective manufacturer's bonding agents were used to restore the cavities. One side of each tooth was restored with composite alone, while the other side was restored with the composite lined with that manufacturer's flowable liner. The restored teeth were thermally stressed and 45Ca was used to evaluate microleakage. Two independent evaluators scored leakage based on the autoradiographs. The results showed flowable composites helped reduce microleakage at gingival margins of Class II restorations (p < 0.05). Gingival margins had higher microleakage than occlusal margins (p < 0.05). Without flowable liners, three packable composites (Alert, Pyramid and Surefil) showed higher leakage (p < 0.05) than the microhybrid control. Only Solitaire packable composite without liner showed no significant difference in microleakage to the control (p > 0.05). Although the flowable liners help reduce microleakage, Alert and Pyramid packable composites with liners still showed higher leakage than the control (p < 0.05). Surefil and Solitaire packable composites with flowable liners showed no significant difference in microleakage (p > 0.05) to the control.     

The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of the study was to measure the adhesion between two types of translucent prefabricated FRC posts (FRC Postec, Ivoclar-Vivadent, FRC; Light-Post, RTD, LP), and two types of flowable composites used as core materials (UnifilFlow, GC, UF; Tetric Flow, Ivoclar-Vivadent, TF), with or without the application of a silane (Monobond-S, Ivoclar-Vivadent, S) on the post surface. METHODS: The experimental groups were: 1.1 FRC+UF; 1.2 FRC+S+UF; 1.3 FRC+TF; 1.4 FRC+S+TF: 2.1 LP+UF; 2.2 LP+S+UF; 2.3 LP+TF; 1.4 LP+S+TF. The bond strength at the interface between post and core was measured with the microtensile non-trimming technique. Thirty to thirty-five beam-shaped specimens per group were obtained from cylinders of core material, which had been built up around the post by progressively adding small increments of composite resin. Each specimen was loaded in tension until failure at either one of the two post-core interfaces present in each stick. The differences in interfacial bond strength among the groups were tested for statistical significance with the two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The measured bond strengths in MPa were: [table: see text]. The statistical analysis revealed that post-silanization had a significant effect on adhesion (p<0.05). With any combination of post and core materials tested, the application of a silane onto the post surface prior to building up the core significantly increased the post-core bond strength. SIGNIFICANCE: For improved adhesion at the interface between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores, post-silanization is advisable.     

The effect of an intermediate layer of flowable composite resin on microleakage in packable composite restorations

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a thin layer of flowable composite on microleakage in Class II direct packable composite resin restorations on young permanent teeth in vitro. METHODS: Twenty sound human premolars and molars extracted for orthodontic reasons were selected for this study. The teeth were randomly assigned into two groups of 10 teeth each (groups A and B). Class II cavities were prepared as uniformly as possible in the mesial and distal aspects of each tooth. The gingival margin extended apically approximately 0.5 mm beyond the cemento-enamel junction, in the dentin. Cavities in group A were restored with packable composite and Alert/Flow-it flowable composite, while groups B cavities were restored with Pyramid/Aeliteflo. The control cavities in groups A1 and B1 were restored with only packable composite. The teeth were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 h to allow dye penetration into possible existing gaps between the tooth substance and the restorative material. All teeth were subjected to thermocycling. RESULTS: The dye penetration ranged between 6.6 and 7.2 mm. No significant difference was found between the control and the experimental groups. CONCLUSION: The use of flowable composite resin as intermediate material does not reduce microleakage.     

The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites

Microleakage has been a major concern in restorative dentistry. The curing contraction of composites still presents a problem with controlling microleakage and postoperative sensitivity. This study investigated the effect of flowable materials on gingival microleakage of microhybrid and packable resin composite restorations. Ninety Class II cavities with cervical margins 1 mm below the CEJ were prepared in 45 extracted human premolars. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=15). In each group, one side of each tooth was restored incrementally with respective composites-SureFil, Filtek P60 and Tetric Ceram; whereas, on the other side, flowable materials-Dyract Flow, Filtek Flow or Tetric Flow-were placed respectively as a 1-mm thick gingival increment before the resin composite restoration. The restored teeth were stored for one week in distilled water at 37 degrees C, thermocycled between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C and immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 hours. Dye penetration was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at 10x magnification. The data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U-tests. The effect of flowable increments on reducing the gingival microleakage was found to be statistically significant for all restorative materials tested (p<0.05).     

CELAY全瓷桩核强度的研究

目的:比较Celay 全瓷桩核、铸造金属桩核及Parapost 预成桩复合树脂核修复的根管治疗牙全冠修复后的抗折裂强度。方法:60 个完整拔除的人上中切牙,根管治疗后随机分为5 组,每组12 个。A 组:牙体预备保留210 mm高的牙本质套圈,Celay 桩核;B 组:牙体预备无牙本质套圈,Celay 桩核;C 组:牙体预备保留210 mm 高的牙本质套圈,铸造金属桩核;D 组:牙体预备无牙本质套圈,铸造金属桩核;E 组:牙体预备保留210 mm高的牙本质套圈,Para2post 预成桩,复合树脂核。所有标本皆用Celay 全冠修复。标本在室温下保存于100 %湿度中30 d 后,在MTS 810 材料试验机上沿与牙长轴成45°的方向加载,测试折裂强度。结果:各组的折裂强度间有显著性差异( P < 0101) ,牙体预备保留210 mm高的牙本质套圈时,Celay 桩核与铸造金属桩核的折裂强度显著高于其他三组,其他三组之间无显著性差异,Celay 桩核修复时,有无210 mm高的牙本质套圈其折裂强度有显著性差异( P < 0105) 。结论:在牙体预备保留210 mm高的牙本质套圈时,Celay 桩核的强度可基本满足临床要求而不致发生桩核的折裂。     

不同制作方法对纤维树脂桩核微渗漏情况的影响

探讨不同制作方法对纤维树脂桩核修复体微渗漏的影响.对36颗经根管治疗的单根离体牙根,使用纤维桩加ParaCore双固化流动树脂,不同方法制作桩核修复体,通过染色透明化法,观察修复体的微渗漏情况.直接成型-直接粘接法制作的修复体微渗漏值(4.94±1.71) mm显著高于直接成型-再粘接法(0.91 ±0.33) mm和间接成型-再粘接法(0.87-0.27) mm(P＜0.05).     

Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated premolars with MOD preparations restored using different material combinations. The null hypothesis postulated that there was no association between the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars and the resin composite materials or the post-and-core system used to build up the restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty single-rooted maxillary premolars were used. After endodontic treatment and preparation of MOD preparations, 8 groups of 10 samples each were created, using the following material combinations: group 1 (control), flowable and microhybrid resin composites; group 2, flowable A; group 3, flowable B; group 4, microhybrid resin A; group 5, microhybrid resin B; group 6, flowable B + microhybrid resin B; group 7, flowable A + microhybrid resin A + post A; group 8, flowable B + microhybrid resin B + post B. Mechanical static fracture tests were performed loading the specimens till fracture. RESULTS: The mean failure loads (N) were 502 (control), 470 (group 7), 445 (group 8), 441 (group 6), 405 (group 5), 364 (group 4), 317 (group 2), and 302 (group 3). Statistically significant differences were found between groups 1 vs 2, 1 vs 3, and 3 vs 7 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with MOD preparations was enhanced by the use of the sandwich technique. The samples restored with posts predominantly showed restorable fractures, while teeth restored without posts mostly displayed unrestorable failures.     

Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with different types of post-core systems and full coverage crowns. METHODS: Extracted human upper premolars were restored with a fiber post, prefabricated metallic post or cast metallic post-core. Teeth with full crown preparations without post-core restorations served as a control. All teeth were restored with full coverage crowns. A 90-degree vertical or 45-degree oblique load was applied to the restored teeth with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and the fracture loads and mode of fracture were recorded. RESULTS: Under the condition of vertical loading, the fracture load of teeth restored with the cast metallic post-cores was greatest among the groups (two-factor factorial ANOVA and Scheffe's F test, P<0.05). All fractures in teeth restored with all types of post-core systems propagated in the middle portions of roots, including the apices of the posts. Under the condition of oblique loading, the fracture load of teeth restored with pre-fabricated metallic posts was significantly smaller than that in other groups. Two-thirds of fractures in the fiber post group propagated within the cervical area, while most fractures in other groups extended beyond the middle of the roots. SIGNIFICANCE: From the results of the present investigations, it was concluded that under the conditions of vertical and oblique loadings, the combination of a fiber post and composite resin core with a full cast crown is most protective of the remaining tooth structure.     

In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars

Many endodontically-treated teeth require quick, simple, low-cost restorations. This study evaluated the effect of horizontal pins and flowable composites on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars directly restored with resin composite. In this in vitro study, 64 intact human maxillary premolars, extracted for orthodontic reasons, were randomly divided into four groups of 16. Standard access cavities were prepared in such a way that the buccal cusp had a buccolingual thickness of 3 mm measured at the height of contour. The palatal cusp was reduced to 1.5 mm coronal to CEJ. The specimens were prepared as follows: Group 1: resin composite restoration without horizontal self-threading pins or flowable composite (control group). Group 2: resin composite restoration without horizontal self-threading pins but with a 2 mm thickness of the flowable composite. Group 3: resin composite restoration with two horizontal self-threading pins in the buccal cusp but without flowable composite. Group 4: resin composite restoration with two horizontal self-threading pins in the buccal cusp and flowable composite with a thickness of 2 mm. Subsequent to thermocycling, all specimens were loaded to failure. The data were analyzed using a two-factor ANOVA test (alpha = 0.05). The maximum mean of fracture resistance was in Group 1 (632.86 +/- 119.46 N), and the minimum value was related to Group 3 (533.49 +/- 168.07 N). There was not a statistically significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Neither horizontal pin placement nor flowable composite had a significant effect on increasing the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars restored with composite.     

Fracture resistance of class II packable composite restorations with and without flowable liners

This study evaluated fracture resistance in class II slot packable composite restorations with and without the use of a flowable composite liner. A conventional microhybrid composite was used as a control. Thirty-six sound, caries-free human mandibulary molar teeth were used. Separate mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal class II slot cavity preparations were made in each tooth. The prepared teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 12 teeth. Two packable composites (Surefil, Filtek P60) and one microhybrid composite (Filtek Z250) with their respective manufacturer's bonding agents were used to restore the cavities. One side of each tooth was restored with composite alone, while the other side was restored with the composite lined with that manufacturer's flowable liner. The marginal ridges of the restorations were loaded at an angle of 13.5 degrees to the long-axis of the tooth in an Instron Testing Machine until failure. The data were analysed using a one-way anova. There was no significant difference in fracture resistance between composite restorations with and without flowable liners.     

Static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with post–cores

OBJECTIVES: Superior restorative methods for effectively strengthening pulpless teeth need to be identified, since vertical root fractures of pulpless teeth are still a major problem in everyday clinical practice. The present study tested the null hypothesis that there were no differences in static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with different types of post-core systems. METHODS: Extracted human premolars were restored with a combination of either a fiber post or metallic post and a composite resin core. Teeth with full crown preparations without post-core restorations served as a control. A 90 degrees vertical or 45 degrees oblique static compressive load was applied to restored teeth, and fracture loads and modes of fracture were recorded. Fatigue fracture tests were conducted by applying sinusoidal cyclic loads to restored teeth from vertical or oblique directions. Fatigue limits for each restoration were calculated using the staircase approach. RESULTS: In both static and fatigue fracture testing under vertical or oblique loadings, the fracture loads of teeth restored with fiber posts were significantly greater than those of teeth restored with metallic posts. The fatigue limits of teeth restored with fiber and metallic posts were 112 kgf and 82 kgf respectively under vertical loadings and 26 kgf and 20 kgf under oblique loadings. SIGNIFICANCE: The combination of a fiber post and a composite resin core showed superior fracture resistance against both static and fatigue loadings compared to restorations using a metallic post, and is therefore recommended in restoring pulpless teeth.