Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins

OBJECTIVE: All breast surgeons deal with the frustration of initial pathologic close or positive margins that have no residual cancer upon re-excision. To understand the mechanisms that create false positive margins, specimen handling was standardized in a single surgeon's practice and margin issues were tracked. METHODS: Prospectively over a 3.5-year period, needle-localized lumpectomies for the management of early-stage breast cancer were standardized in all aspects of specimen handling, including surgeon inking and specimen compression for specimen radiography for quality assurance. The current study reviews 220 such cases where the original lumpectomy included a small piece of overlying skin from over the target lesion. All specimen radiography was performed with compression at the skin to deep level to bias the "pancaking" effect of pushing tumor to specimen surface to the deep margin. RESULTS: Of the 220 therapeutic lumpectomies performed for clinical stage 0-2 breast cancer in this fashion, 175 (79.5%) had negative margins by a distance of 10 mm or more. Margins less than 10 mm were classified as close and were present in 20 (9.1%) of cases. These were heavily biased toward margins closer than 2 mm. Positive initial margins accounted for 25 (11.4%) of cases. Of the 45 close or positive margin cases, 12 involved the deep margin only, and on re-excision none was found to have residual tumor. When other single margins were involved, re-excision found tumor in 5 of 14 cases (35.7%). When multiple margins were close or positive, 9 of 19 cases (47.3%) were found to have residual tumor at re-excision. CONCLUSIONS: Specimen compression increases the incidence of false margin positivity. The best predictors of true margin positivity are multiple close or positive margins or margin positivity in a direction not associated with specimen ex vivo compression.     

Location and extent of positive resection margins and ductal carcinoma in situ in lumpectomy specimens of ductal breast carcinoma examined with a microscopic three-dimensional view

The location of positive margins in lumpectomy specimens for ductal carcinoma could be predicted due to the common pattern of the geographic relationship between the intraductal and invasive carcinomas. To test this hypothesis, 62 lumpectomy specimens for ductal carcinoma of the breast were submitted for this study. The specimens were microscopically examined by serially sectioning them into giant sections in a plane parallel to the chest wall (frontal plane). The margins were identified as proximal (closest to the nipple), distal (opposite to proximal), and peripheral (nonproximal or distal). We found that the location of positive or close margins was proximal in 6 cases, peripheral in 13 cases, and none were found to be distal. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was found to be located in the area adjacent to the invasive carcinoma. The invasive carcinoma was located at the periphery of the intraductal carcinoma. All six specimens with invasive carcinoma without DCIS had free margins. Nine of 16 specimens (56%) with extensive intraductal carcinoma (EIC) component and 7 of 40 (18%) with DCIS but negative EIC contained positive or close margins involved by DCIS. One case with multifocal invasive carcinoma measuring 3.5 cm in diameter and with DCIS but EIC negative had margins involved by both DCIS and invasive carcinoma. In conclusion, in ductal carcinoma, invasive carcinoma arose at the peripheral areas of the DCIS. DCIS tends to spread toward the nipple and the peripheral margins of the resected specimens. Incomplete excision of the ductal carcinoma and the wide positive margins are most likely caused by the failure to estimate the extent and location of DCIS.     

Accuracy of AJCC staging for breast cancer patients undergoing re-excision for positive margins

Background: The current AJCC protocol for breast cancer staging does not include additional tumor found at the time of re-excision in the calculation of tumor size. We hypothesize that the AJCC protocol may result in understaging and undertreatment of breast cancer patients who have additional tumor found at re-excision. Methods: In a retrospective chart review of breast cancer patients, patients with tumor present at re-excision for positive margins were placed in group 1 (n=72); patients with no tumor present at re-excision, or who underwent a single, negative margin procedure were placed in group 2 (n=147). Results: Patients in group 1 had a higher risk of nodal metastases when compared to patients in group 2. Mean tumor size did not differ significantly between the subgroups. Positive re-excision was strongly associated with lymph node metastases on multivariate analysis after correction for age, grade, stage, and lymphatic invasion (odds ratio=3.13, 95% CI=1.58 6.18,P=.0011). Conclusions: Current AJCC guidelines may result in undertreatment of breast cancer patients with positive re-excisions. The presence of additional tumor at the time of re-excision should be considered when determining the need for systemic therapy, and may be relevant in determining T stage.Presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of The Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, California, March 27, 1998.     

Severe fatigue after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: A comparison with age-matched breast cancer survivors and healthy controls

PurposeSevere fatigue after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been studied before. The current study examined (i) the prevalence of severe fatigue in DCIS patients versus breast cancer survivors (BCS) and healthy controls (HC), (ii) quality of life and functioning of severely versus non-severely fatigued DCIS patients and BCS, and (iii) the association of fatigue with psychosocial and behavioral factors in DCIS patients.Methods89 patients treated for DCIS were matched on age and gender to 67 BCS and 178 HC (ratio 1:1:2). Fatigue was measured with the Fatigue Severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength.Results23% of DCIS patients, 25% of BCS, and 6% of HC were severely fatigued (DCIS versus HC: p < 0.001). Severely fatigued DCIS patients had a lower quality of life and were more impaired in all domains of functioning than non-severely fatigued DCIS patients. Sleep problems, dysfunctional cognitions regarding fatigue, avoidance of activities, all-or-nothing behavior, perceived lack of social support, DCIS-related coping problems, and fear of future cancer occurrence were related to fatigue.ConclusionsThe prevalence of severe fatigue in DCIS patients was similar to BCS, but higher than in HC. Severely fatigued DCIS patients had a lower quality of life and more functional impairments. The psychosocial and behavioral fatigue-related factors in DCIS patients are known to perpetuate fatigue in BCS. These factors can be targeted in interventions for cancer-related fatigue. Our findings suggest that the same treatment elements might be applicable to severely fatigued DCIS patients.     

Factors associated with decision to pursue mastectomy and breast reconstruction for treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Background

Factors influencing the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with mastectomy and reconstruction are poorly understood.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 196 patients presenting to one institution was performed.

Results

Forty-seven patients (24.0%) were treated with mastectomy, while 149 (76.0%) underwent breast-conserving surgery. Of the mastectomy patients, 28 (59.6%) elected for reconstruction. On bivariate analysis, patients who opted for mastectomy were younger than those treated with breast-conserving surgery (median age, 51.8 vs 56.5 years; P = .017) and had higher grade tumors (50.0% vs 34.6% grade 3, P = .009). Among patients treated with mastectomy, those who opted for reconstruction were younger than those forgoing reconstruction (49.4 vs 56.9 years, P = .024). Race, ductal carcinoma in situ tumor size, and histologic subtype were not associated with the decision to pursue mastectomy or reconstruction (P > .05 for all).

Conclusions

In patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, the decision to pursue mastectomy and reconstruction appears to be driven by younger patient age and higher tumor grade.     

Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND: Reported rates of reexcision for margin control after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) range from 48% to 59%. The optimal technique for intraoperative margin assessment in patients with DCIS has yet to be defined. We sought to determine whether intraoperative multidisciplinary evaluation using gross tissue assessment and sectioned-specimen radiography reduces the need for reoperation for margin control in DCIS. METHODS: A prospectively compiled database was used to identify patients who had DCIS diagnosed by core needle biopsy and were treated with breast-conserving surgery at our institution between July 1999 and July 2002. All patients had intraoperative gross margin assessment and specimen radiography of both the whole and sliced specimen for calcifications. RESULTS: Four hundred two patients with DCIS were evaluated at our institution during the study period. Of these, 160 had excisional biopsy for diagnosis prior to referral, 92 had mastectomy as their initial procedure, 40 were seen for a second opinion only, and 1 patient refused surgery. The remaining 109 patients formed the study population. The median age was 55 years (range 34 to 81). The median pathologic size of DCIS was 1.2 cm (range 0.2 to 8.0 cm). Fifty-nine patients had positive (less than 1 mm) or close (less than 5 mm) margins on intraoperative assessment. Final pathology agreed with intraoperative assessment of a positive or close margin in 43 of the 59 patients (P = 0.00005). Seventy-five percent of those thought to have a positive or close margin at the time of surgery (n = 44) underwent intraoperative reexcision. Of the total 109 patients, 31 (34%) had an intraoperative reexcision that resulted in a change in margin status from positive on intraoperative evaluation to negative on final pathologic evaluation (P < 0.00001). A second procedure for margin control was necessary in only 24 patients (22%). The decision to excise additional tissue at the first surgery on the basis of intraoperative assessment resulted in significantly fewer second procedures for margin control (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DCIS, intraoperative margin assessment by gross pathological examination and sliced specimen radiography significantly affects intraoperative decision making, and excision of further tissue on the basis of intraoperative assessment results in a substantial decrease in second procedures for margin control.     

Risk factors for estrogen receptor positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in African American women

BackgroundCompared to U.S. white women, African American women are more likely to die from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Elucidation of risk factors for DCIS in African American women may provide opportunities for risk reduction.MethodsWe used data from three epidemiologic studies in the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium to study risk factors for estrogen receptor (ER) positive DCIS (488 cases; 13,830 controls). Results were compared to associations observed for ER+ invasive breast cancer (n = 2,099).ResultsFirst degree family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risk of ER+ DCIS [odds ratio (OR): 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31, 2.17]. Oral contraceptive use within the past 10 years (vs. never) was also associated with increased risk (OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.97), as was late age at first birth (≥25 years vs. <20 years) (OR: 1.26, 95%CI: 0.96, 1.67). Risk was reduced in women with older age at menarche (≥15 years vs. <11 years) (OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.42, 0.93) and higher body mass index (BMI) in early adulthood (≥25 vs. <20 kg/m² at age 18 or 21) (OR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.55, 1.01). There was a positive association of recent BMI with risk in postmenopausal women only. In general, associations of risk factors for ER+ DCIS were similar in magnitude and direction to those for invasive ER+ breast cancer.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that most risk factors for invasive ER+ breast cancer are also associated with increased risk of ER+ DCIS among African American women.     

Assessment of treatment for patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast

Background: Current mammographic technology has resulted in increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is necessary to assess which patients presenting with DCIS are good candidates for breast conservation and which of these patients should receive adjuvant radiation. Methods: We accrued clinical data for 124 patients with a primary diagnosis of DCIS from 1979 through 1994. Primary therapy was a mastectomy for 18 patients, and a lumpectomy for 106 patients. Only 18 of the latter group of patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. For the 88 lumpectomy-alone patients (median follow-up, 5.2 years), we evaluated the effects of clinical (age and initial presentation) and pathologic (nuclear grade, architecture, parenchymal involvement, calcifications, and measured margins) factors on recurrence of DCIS or the development of invasive breast cancer. Results: Patients who underwent lumpectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (median follow-up, 5.0 years) were significantly more likely to have recurrence of DCIS (P=.05) than those who underwent mastectomy (median follow-up, 6.7 years): 18% (19/106) versus 0% (0/18), respectively; lumpectomy-alone patients experienced a 19% (17/88) rate of DCIS recurrence. All recurrent DCIS was ipsilateral. For lumpectomy-alone patients, the factors associated with ipsilateral recurrence of DCIS were extent of involvement of the parenchyma (P=.01, for univariate;P=.07, for multivariate) and initial presentation (P=.05, for univariate;P=.07, for multivariate). Eleven lumpectomy-alone patients developed invasive breast cancer (6 ipsilateral, 5 contralateral); none of the 18 lumpectomy patients who received adjuvant radiation developed invasive disease. None of the factors investigated, including primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, were associated with a significant effect on the development of invasive disease. Conclusions: Longer follow-up is required to determine if the benefits of either mastectomy or radiotherapy following lumpectomy persist. There is a suggestion that patients under 40 years of age or women who present with nipple discharge might be considered for either adjuvant radiotherapy following lumpectomy or a simple mastectomy.     

乳腺导管原位癌的超声特征

目的探讨乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的超声表现特征。方法回顾性分析经病理证实的54例乳腺DCIS的超声表现,包括病灶形态、大小、边缘、边界、内部回声、后方回声、微钙化、导管改变及血供,并与病理结果进行对比。结果54例均经术后病理证实为乳腺DCIS,其中高级别34例,中级别13例,低级别7例;5例伴微浸润灶,均未见腋窝淋巴结转移。声像图表现为片状低回声型20例(20/51,39.22%)、结节状肿块型17例(17/51,33.33%)、导管扩张型8例(8/51,15.69%)、单纯微钙化型6例(6/51,11.76%),3例假阴性,检出率94.44%(51/54)。超声正确诊断44例,准确率81.48%(44/54)。结论乳腺DCIS超声表现具有一定特征性;正确认识其超声征象能有效提高诊断符合率。     

Treatment trends for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Background: As a result of clinical trial publications, breast conservation treatment has been increasingly used for invasive breast cancer. The patterns of care for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were analyzed for the years 1985, 1986, 1988, 1990, and 1991 to determine whether the same treatment principles had been applied to patients with noninvasive disease. Methods: Data submitted on 20,556 patients with DCIS during the 5 study years were analyzed with regard to basic demographics and treatment trends. Results: Breast-conserving surgery for DCIS increased from 20.9% in 1985 to 35.4% in 1991. Modified radical mastectomy remained constant at 42%. Axillary node surgery increased from 52% in 1985 to 58.5% in 1991. The use of radiation therapy for patients with partial mastectomy and no lymph node dissection ranges from 24.2% in 1990 to 37.7% in 1985, with 31.1% receiving radiation therapy in 1991. Patients undergoing lymph node dissection with partial mastectomy were more than twice as likely to receive postoperative radiation therapy than were patients without lymph node dissection. Conclusions: Modified radical mastectomy remains the most common surgical procedure, despite the eligibility of many women for breast conservation treatment. As of 1991 the majority of women were still undergoing axillary lymph node surgery despite a node positivity rate of ≈1%. Radiation therapy is significantly underused in patients with partial mastectomy, especially when no nodes were removed. Clinical trial results and professional education for DCIS treatment should change these trends. Presented at the 47th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Houston, Texas, March 17–19, 1994.     

A perplexing presentation of a breast carcinoma: a case report

Breast cancer is a devastating disease for women. In this paper, we present a breast carcinoma presenting in a bizarre location. It was initially presumed that the patient had skin cancer, but the lesion turned out to be breast cancer presenting as a superficial mass on the skin of the breast.     

Breast conservative surgery for well-differentiated ductal intraepithelial neoplasia: Risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

RationalWe retrospectively analyzed 232 patients affected by well differentiated ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN1c or DCIS G1) treated with conservative surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy.Results25 invasive and 18 non-invasive local recurrences were observed (median follow-up 80 months; 5-year cumulative incidence: 12.2%). Seven of the 15 young patients (<40 y) developed local recurrence (2 in situ, 5 invasive). Age <50 (HR 1.89, 95% C.I. 1.01–3.45), multifocality (HR 3.21, 95% C.I. 1.46–7.06), Ki-67 > 7% (HR 2.33, 95% C.I. 1.20–4.55) and surgical margins <10 mm (HR 2.00, 95% C.I. 1.06–3.76) were significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence.ConclusionsYoung age, multifocality and small margins appeared as clear risk factors of local recurrence in DIN1c (DCIS G1) population. The presence of multiple poor prognostic features warrant a thorough discussion regarding local treatment.     

Gradient index ductoscopy and intraductal biopsy of intraductal breast lesions

OBJECTIVE: Breast duct endoscopy is increasingly used for evaluation of intraductal disease. We have investigated a new rigid instrument for ductoscopy and intraductal biopsy of pathologic lesions. METHODS: From 2002 to 2006, ductoscopy was performed in 111 women with breast cancer or pathologic nipple discharge. A rigid gradient index microendoscope (diameter .7 mm) was used for all examinations in combination with a specially developed needle for intraductal vacuum-assisted biopsy. Ductoscopy and intraductal biopsy were correlated with ductal cytology and histopathology of the resection specimen. RESULTS: Ductoscopy identified intraductal lesions in 41% of the patients with breast cancer presenting as red patches, microcalcifications, or ductal obstruction. Compared with patients with a normal ductoscopy, patients with pathologic ductoscopy had a significantly higher risk of extensive intraductal carcinoma (71% versus 16%, P < .05). Ductal cytology showed only a few cases with severe cytologic atypia or malignant cells in cases with ductoscopic abnormalities. Intraductal vacuum-assisted biopsy yielded diagnostic material in 89% of 36 patients with nipple discharge and papillomatous lesions. Histology of the resection specimen confirmed the diagnosis in all cases (26 papillomas, 2 in situ carcinomas, and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas). In contrast, ductal cytology showed only moderate correlation with histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Ductoscopy is a useful supplement for the standard radiological workup of breast cancer especially in patients with extensive intraductal carcinoma. Ductoscopic vacuum-assisted biopsy is a new and effective technique for intraductal biopsy under visual control.     

Margin width as the sole determinant of local recurrence after breast conservation in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND: A previous study showed a 3% local recurrence risk at 8 years in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients treated with excision alone with surgical margins of 10 mm or greater. This study updates those data. METHODS: A total of 272 DCIS patients treated conservatively with 10 mm or greater margins were reviewed in a prospective database. RESULTS: Among 212 excision-alone patients, there were 9 DCIS and 3 invasive recurrences. The 12-year probability of any local recurrence was 13.9%; of invasive recurrence it was 3.4%. Among 60 excision plus radiation patients, there was 1 local (invasive) recurrence (P = .06). The 12-year probability of local recurrence was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence in DCIS patients treated with excision alone with margins of 10 mm or greater compares favorably with local recurrence in DCIS patients with nontransected margins and treated with postoperative radiation. The risk of invasive recurrence among widely excised DCIS patients is extremely low.     

Is mammography useful in screening for local recurrences in patients with TRAM flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for multifocal DCIS?

Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction is being used more often for the treatment of breast cancer. Mammography is not used routinely to evaluate TRAM flaps in women who have undergone mastectomy. We have identified the potential value of its use in selected patients. Methods and Results: We report on four women who manifested local recurrences in TRAM flaps after initial treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with microinvasion undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. All four patients presented with extensive, high-grade, multifocal DCIS that precluded breast conservation. Three of four mastectomy specimens demonstrated tumor close to the surgical margin. Three of the four recurrences were detected by physical examination; the remaining local recurrence was documented by screening mammography. The recurrences had features suggestive of malignancy on mammography. Conclusion: We conclude that all patients undergoing mastectomy and TRAM reconstruction for extensive, multifocal DCIS should undergo regular routine mammography of the reconstructed breast. Our experience with this subgroup of patients raises concern about the value of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction for therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy should be recommended for those patients with negative but close surgical margins.     

Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer

Background: The best cosmetic results with conservative breast surgery are obtained at the time of initial excisional biopsy. The usefulness of the touch prep (TP) technique was evaluated for accuracy in diagnosis as well as in evaluation of margins at the time of original breast biopsy. Methods: Four hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients with breast masses seen from January 1993 to December 1994 were evaluated prospectively using TP. Results: Three hundred forty-five benign and 83 malignant tumors were evaluated. Tumors ranged in size from microscopic to 8 cm. Pathologic diagnosis was correct as compared to permanent section in 99.3%. The three carcinomas missed on TP were focal and in situ. Sensitivity was 96.39%, and specificity was 100%. Positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 99.3%. For margin evaluation, the sensitivity and specificity were both estimated to be 100%. Conclusions: TP has the advantage of being a simple, quick (2 to 3 minutes), safe (no loss of diagnostic material), and accurate method for diagnosis and estimation of tumor margins at the time of the original surgery.Presented at the 49th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, March 21–24, 1996.     

Patterns of care for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Queensland's experience over a decade

ObjectivesTo review management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in Queensland, with reference to breast conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). In addition, we examined the incidence of invasive breast cancer recurrence and factors predictive of invasive recurrence.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of the Queensland Oncology Repository identified women with resected DCIS (TisN0) ± adjuvant RT between 2003 and 2012. Time to invasive breast cancer recurrence was analysed using the Kaplan Meier method. Median follow-up was 4.9 years.Results3038 women had surgery. 940 (31%) had mastectomy and 2098 (69%) underwent BCS. Of 2098 women having BCS, 1100 (52%) received BCS alone and 998(48%) received adjuvant RT. The use of RT significantly increased over the decade from 25% to 62% (p=<0.001). Clinicopathological factors associated with RT use on multivariate analysis included age ≤70, higher socioeconomic status, larger tumour size, higher nuclear grade and surgical margins ≤5 mm. Invasive breast cancer recurrence at 5 years was 1.7% [95% CI 1.0–3.0] in RT group versus 2.8% [95% CI 2.1–3.8] in BCS alone group. Factors associated with increased risk of invasive recurrence on multivariate analysis were age <40 and surgical margins ≤2 mm.ConclusionThe use of adjuvant RT in Queensland significantly increased between 2003 and 2012. Selection of patients for RT was based on clinicopathological factors associated with higher recurrence risk. Although longer follow-up is required, the selective use of radiation therapy after BCS is associated with a low rate of invasive breast cancer recurrence at 5 years.     

A review of the management of ductal carcinoma in situ following breast conserving surgery

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous, pre-malignant disease accounting for 10–20% of all new breast tumours. Evidence shows a statistically significant local control benefit for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for all patients. The baseline recurrence risk of individual patients varies according to clinical-pathological criteria and in selected patients, omission of RT may be considered, following a discussion with the patient. The role of adjuvant endocrine therapy remains uncertain. Ongoing studies are attempting to define subgroups of patients who are at sufficiently low risk of recurrence that RT may be safely omitted; investigating RT techniques and dose fractionation schedules; and defining the role of endocrine therapy. Future directions in the management of patients with DCIS will include investigation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers to inform individualised therapy tailored to the risk of recurrence.     

X线检查阴性乳腺导管原位癌的临床病理特点

【摘要】〓目的〓探讨乳腺X线检查(MG)阴性的乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)及DCIS伴微浸润(DCIS-MI)的临床及诊断特点。方法〓对我院2012年1月~2013年8月32例MG检查阴性的DCIS及DCIS-MI的临床病理资料进行回顾性分析。结果〓MG阴性导管原位癌临床表现为单纯乳头溢液占71.9%(23/32),乳腺肿块占15.6%(5/32)例,良性钙化12.5%(4/32)例。MG检查阴性导管原位癌中腺体高密度、低核分级、PR阳性、HER2(-)或(+)病例的比例明显高于同期MG检查阳性组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。补充其他诊断检查的结果显示,乳腺超声敏感性为18.7%(6/32),磁共振(MRI)敏感性可达为87.5%(28/32),对表现为乳头溢液的病例,乳管镜诊断的敏感性为52.2%(12/23)。结论〓MG阴性的导管原位癌临床病理生物学指标相对较好,MRI检查可进一步提高其检出率,乳管镜对于乳头溢液的病例是有益的补充检查手段。     

影响乳腺癌患者保乳手术边缘阳性因素的临床研究

目的探讨乳腺癌的临床病理学特征对保乳手术边缘阳性的影响。方法189例预行保乳手术术(BCT)的原发性乳腺癌患者,分析她们的临床特征(年龄,活检类型)和病理学特征(肿瘤大小,组织学类型,激素受体状态,HER2状态,和腋窝淋巴结状态)与阳性手术边缘的关系。结果189例患者中本组室心针肿脾物案例活检确诊79例,门诊或手术中切除活检确诊128例。61例手术边缘阳性(32.3%)。结论本研究的结果揭示:肿瘤直径大于2cm,腋窝淋巴结阳性PR阳性和年龄小于50岁是乳癌保乳手术边缘阳性的高危因素对1999年1月～2004年7月189例乳腺癌患者按受保乳手术进行回顾性分析,并总结手术切口边保阳性与临床特征病理案组但表现及激素受体状态的关系。