Active and passive tobacco smoking and the risk of borderline and invasive ovarian cancer (United States)

Objective: A population-based case–control study was conducted to examine the hypothesis that active and passive tobacco smoking were associated with the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: In-person interviews were obtained from 558 women with epithelial ovarian cancer (431 invasive, 127 borderline) and 607 population controls regarding active lifetime tobacco smoking, environmental tobacco smoke exposure in utero and during childhood, and other factors that may be related to the development of ovarian cancer. Results: No significant associations of ever or former tobacco smoking with the risk of invasive or borderline ovarian cancer were found, although long-term ex-smokers of 20 years or more were at significantly reduced risk of invasive cancer. Significant, positive dose–response relations of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and pack-years with the odds ratios for borderline cancer were evident. No association of active tobacco smoking with risk was found by histologic subtype of invasive ovarian cancer. Smokers were at significantly increased risk for borderline serous cystadenoma (OR: 1.91; 95% confidence intervals, CI: 1.09–3.34), but not for borderline mucinous cystadenoma. When we limited the analyses to current smokers, age-started smoking was significantly inversely related to the risk of invasive, but not borderline ovarian cancer. We found no association of gestational or childhood environmental tobacco smoke exposure with the risk of invasive or borderline ovarian cancer among never smokers. Conclusions: These findings do not support an association of active tobacco smoking with the risk of invasive ovarian cancer. An increased risk of borderline serous cystadenoma among smokers must be viewed with caution.     

Cigarette Smoking, Alcohol Consumption, and Endometrial Cancer Risk: A Population-based Study in Sweden

Objective: To assess effects of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption on the risk of endometrial cancer among postmenopausal women. Methods: We performed a nationwide population-based case–control study among postmenopausal women aged 50–74 years in Sweden, including 709 incident endometrial cancer cases and 3368 controls. Results: Compared to never smokers, recent/current smokers had a decreased risk of endometrial cancer (multivariate OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47–0.80), but former smokers presented no substantial difference in risk (multivariate OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72–1.14). We observed a decreased risk of endometrial cancer for postmenopausal smoking, but there was no clear impact on risk for premenopausal smoking. The inverse association of smoking with risk was not explained by differences in body mass index between smokers and nonsmokers. Alcohol consumption was not clearly associated with risk of endometrial cancer. The multivariate OR for women consuming up to 1.6 g of alcohol per day was 1.12 (95% CI 0.88–1.44), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.70–1.20) for women consuming more than 4 g per day (p for trend over categories=0.44). Conclusions: Current cigarette smoking reduces the risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer, but the inverse association dissipates after smoking cessation. Premenopausal smoking might not affect risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer. Alcohol consumption is not materially associated with risk.     

Tobacco use and prostate cancer in Blacks and Whites in the United States

Prostate cancer occurs more frequently in Blacks than Whites in the United States. A population-based case-control study which investigated the association between tobacco use and prostate cancer risk was carried out among 981 pathologically confirmed cases (479 Blacks, 502 Whites) of prostate cancer, diagnosed between 1 August 1986 and 30 April 1989, and 1,315 controls (594 Blacks, 721 Whites). Study subjects, aged 40 to 79 years, resided in Atlanta (GA), Detroit (MI), and 10 counties in New Jersey, geographic areas covered by three, population-based, cancer registries. No excesses in risk for prostate cancer were seen for former cigarette smokers, in Blacks (odds ratio [OR]=1.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.7–1.5) and in Whites (OR=1.2, CI=0.9–1.6), or for current cigarette smokers, in Blacks (OR=1.0, CI=0.7–1.4) and in Whites (OR=1.2, CI=0.8–1.7). Increases in risk were noted for smokers of 40 or more cigarettes per day, among former (OR=1.4, CI=1.0–1.5) and current (OR=1.5, CI=1.0–2.4) smokers. Duration of cigarette use and cumulative amount of cigarette use (pack-years) were not associated with prostate cancer risk for Blacks or Whites. By age, only the youngest subjects, aged 40 to 59 years, showed excess risk associated with current (OR=1.5, CI=1.0–2.3) and former (OR=1.7, CI=1.1–2.6) use of cigarettes, but there were no consistent patterns in this group according to amount or duration of smoking. Risks also were not elevated for former or current users of pipes, cigars, or chewing tobacco, but the risk associated with current snuff use was OR=5.5 (CI=1.2–26.2). This subgroup finding may have been due to chance. The results of the present study may be consistent with a small excess risk for prostate cancer associated with tobacco use, but the lack of consistent findings in population subgroups and the lack of a clear dose-response relationship argue more strongly that no causal association exists. The data do not indicate that the Black-White difference in prostate cancer risk is related to tobacco use.This research was performed under contracts: NO1-CP-51090, NO1-CN-0522, NO1-CP-51089, NO1-CN-31022, NO1-CP-51092, and NO1-CN-5227.     

Epidemiology of bladder cancer in Alexandria,Egypt: Tobacco smoking

The relationship between smoking and bladder cancer risk was investigated using data from a case-control study conducted between January 1994 and July 1996 in Alexandria, Egypt. Cases were 151 males with incident, histologically confirmed invasive cancer of the bladder, and controls were 157 males admitted to hospital for acute, non-neoplastic, non-urinary tract, non-smoking-related conditions. With reference to never smokers, ex-smokers had a multivariate odds ratio (OR) of 4.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–11.7] and current smokers of 6.6 (95% CI 3.1–13.9). The ORs were 5.4 for <20 and 7.6 for ≥20 cigarettes per day. After adjustment for cigarette smoking, the ORs were 0.8 for waterpipe and 0.4 for hashish smokers. The risk was significantly related to duration of smoking (OR of 16.5 for >40 years), and inversely related to age at starting (OR of 8.8 for starting <20 years), and inversely related to time since quitting smoking. Compared with never smokers who did not report a clinical history of schistosomiasis, the OR was 9.4 for smokers with a history of schistosomiasis, and 10.7 for smokers ever employed in high-risk occupations compared with non-smokers not reporting such a history. Thus, our results, while not giving indications of an increased bladder cancer risk with habits other than cigarette smoking, found a remarkably strong association with various measures of cigarette smoking that could explain 75% of bladder cancer cases among males from Alexandria. The prevalence of smoking was very low among women, and consequently tobacco was not a relevant risk factor for female bladder cancer. Int. J. Cancer 73:64–67, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Hormonal risk factors for endometrial cancer: modification by cigarette smoking (United States)

Objectives: To evaluate whether smoking modifies the risk of endometrial cancer associated with body mass index (BMI), postmenopausal hormone use, and other hormonal factors. Methods: Using multivariate adjusted models we examined interview data from a population-based case–control study of Wisconsin women (n = 740 cases, n = 2372 controls). Results: The relative risk for endometrial cancer associated with current smoking was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6–1.0) compared to never smokers. No clear dose–response relationship was evident for pack-years smoked. When examined according to smoking status the risk associated with the highest quartile of BMI seemed to be greater among non-smokers (OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 2.4–5.3) than among current smokers (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4–5.6). Among postmenopausal women the risk associated with current use of postmenopausal hormones appeared to be greater among non-smokers (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.3–4.9) than among current smokers (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3–5.5). Risk for long-term use (10 or more years) compared with never users was 8.3 (95% CI: 4.6–15.1) among never smokers and 2.5 (95% CI: 0.8–7.9) among current smokers. The risk associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes was greater among non-smokers (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.7–3.6) than current smokers (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.4–3.1). There was no modifying effect of smoking on the risk associated with parity. Conclusion: These results suggest that smoking moderates the risk associated with endometrial cancer among women at greatest risk, specifically women who are obese or who use postmenopausal hormones.     

Passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk in Canada, 1994–97

Background: Studies comparing ever smokers with never smokers have found little increase in breast cancer risk. However, the five published studies examining passive smoking and breast cancer have all suggested associations with both passive and active smoking, particularly premenopausal risk. Methods: We analyzed data collected through the Canadian National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System, from 805 premenopausal and 1512 postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed (incident), histologically confirmed, primary breast cancer and 2438 population controls. The mailed questionnaire included questions on breast cancer risk factors and a lifetime residential and occupational history of exposure to passive smoking. Results: Among premenopausal women who were never active smokers, regular exposure to passive smoke was associated with an adjusted breast cancer odds ratio (OR) of 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–4.6). Passive exposure showed a strong dose–response trend (test for trend p=0.0007) with an OR of 2.9 (95% CI 1.3–6.6) for more than 35 years of passive residential and/or occupational exposure. When premenopausal women who had ever actively smoked were compared with women never regularly exposed to passive or active smoke, the adjusted OR for breast cancer was also 2.3 (95% CI 1.2–4.5). Among postmenopausal women who were never-active smokers, regular exposure to passive smoke was associated with an adjusted breast cancer OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.8–1.8) and an OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9–2.3) for the most highly exposed quartile of women. The adjusted OR for postmenopausal breast cancer risk for ever-active smokers compared with women never regularly exposed to passive or active smoke was 1.5 (95% CI 1.0–2.3). Statistically significant dose–response relationships were observed with increasing years of smoking, increasing pack-years and decreasing years since quitting. Women with 35 or more years of smoking had an adjusted OR of 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.7). Conclusions: Active and passive smoking may be associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly premenopausal risk.     

Oral snuff,smoking habits and alcohol consumption in relation to oral cancer in a Swedish case-control study

The use of oral snuff is a widespread habit in Sweden. We investigated whether the use of Swedish moist snuff leads to an increasing risk of oral cancer. Other risk factors such as smoking tobacco and alcoholic beverages were also investigated. Our study comprised 410 patients with oral cancer, from the period 1980–1989, and 410 matched controls. All subjects received a mailed questionnaire. The response rates were 96% and 91% for cases and controls, respectively. In the study, a total of 20% of all subjects, cases and controls, were active or ex-snuff users. The univariate analysis did not show any increased risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–1.1] for active snuff users. We found an increased risk (OR 1.8, CI 1.1–2.7) for oral cancer among active smokers. Alcohol consumption showed the strongest risk for oral cancer. Among consumers of beer, an increased risk of 1.9 (CI 0.9–3.9) was found. Corresponding ORs for wine and liquor were 1.3 (CI 0.9–1.8) and 1.6 (CI 1.1–2.3), respectively. A dose-response effect was observed. Although not statistically significant, a multivariate analysis similarly suggested that the most important risk factors were beer and liquor consumption, followed by smoking. Int. J. Cancer 77:341–346, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking and bladder cancer risk in European men

Objective: Estimating the risk of bladder cancer from cigar and pipe smoking is complicated by a small number of non-cigarette smokers included in most relevant studies. Methods: We undertook a pooled analysis of the data on men from six published case–control studies from Denmark, France, Germany, and Spain, to assess the association between pipe and cigar smoking and bladder cancer, and to compare it with the risk from cigarette smoking. Complete history of tobacco smoking was ascertained separately for cigarettes, cigars, and pipe. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated after adjusting for age, study, and employment in high-risk occupations. Results: The pooled data set comprised 2279 cases and 5268 controls, of whom 88 cases and 253 controls smoked only cigars or pipe. The OR for pure cigarette smoking was 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9–4.2), that for pure pipe smoking was 1.9 (95% CI 1.2–3.1) and that for pure cigar smoking was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6–3.5). The increase in the OR of bladder cancer that was observed with duration of smoking was non-significantly lower for cigars than for cigarettes. Conclusion: Our results suggest that smoking of cigars and pipe is carcinogenic to the urinary bladder, although the potency might be lower than for cigarettes.     

Case-control study of lung cancer during 1994-1997 in the birth cohort in Tasmania,Australia, with an excess of female cases during 1983-1992

Objective: In Tasmania, Australia, lung cancer incidence for 25–44-year-old women has reached that of 25–44-year-old men despite less smoking by the women. We investigated whether this could be due to greater female-than-male relative risk for smoking. Methods: This was a case–control study of lung cancer in the 1939–1964 birth cohort. In person (n = 100) or by proxy, 158 of the 160 cases arising during 1994–1997 were interviewed. Controls were a representative sample of the cohort (response 82.8%). Detailed measurements of tobacco smoking were made by questionnaire, and using the results of 17 machine tests of cigarette tar yields. Results: The male smokers had greater accumulated exposure to smoking and, in reversal of the previously reported excess of female cases in this cohort, most (99/160) of the 1994–1997 cases were men. Nevertheless, the proportions attributable to smoking were similar: 0.86 (0.76–0.97) of male cases, and 0.87 (0.74–0.99) of female cases. Calculated relative to male never-smokers, the estimated relative risks were similar for male and female smokers, particularly with exposure measured by cumulative tar yield of all cigarettes smoked. Conclusions: We found no compelling evidence of greater susceptibility to lung cancer for female smokers.     

A prospective study on active and environmental tobacco smoking and bladder cancer risk (The Netherlands)

Objective: In a prospective cohort study among 120,852 adult subjects the authors investigated the associations between cigarette, cigar, pipe, environmental tobacco smoking (ETS), and bladder cancer. Methods: In 1986 all subjects completed a questionnaire on cancer risk factors. Follow-up for incident bladder cancer was established by linkage to cancer registries until 1992. The case–cohort analysis was based on 619 cases and 3346 subcohort members. Results: Compared with lifelong non-smokers the age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios (RR) for ex- and current cigarette smokers were 2.1 (95% CI 1.5–3.0) and 3.3 (95% CI 2.4–4.6), respectively. The RR for smoking duration was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02–1.04) per 1-year increment. The RR per 10 cigarettes/day was 1.3 (95% CI 1.2–1.4). Tar and nicotine exposure increased bladder cancer risk only weakly. It appeared that associations of cigarette smoking characteristics with bladder cancer risk were largely attributable to cigarette smoking duration only. Smoking cessation, age at first exposure, filter-tip usage, cigar and pipe smoking, and ETS were no longer associated with bladder cancer risk after adjustment for frequency and duration of smoking. Conclusions: The authors conclude that current cigarette smokers have a three-fold higher bladder cancer risk than non-smokers. Ex-smokers experience a two-fold increased risk. About half of male bladder cancer and one-fifth of female bladder cancer was attributable to cigarette smoking. Other smoking types (cigar, pipe, or ETS) were not associated with increased risks.     

Smoking and Hematolymphopoietic Malignancies

Objective: Tobacco use is the most prominent cause of respiratory cancers. Little is known, however, about the influence of smoking on hematolymphopoietic malignancies. To evaluate this relation, a population-based case–control study was carried out in 12 areas of Italy. Methods: Detailed interviews on tobacco smoking habits were administered to 1450 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 365 Hodgkin's disease (HD), 270 multiple myeloma (MM), and 649 leukemia (LEU) patients occurring from 1990 to 1993, and 1779 population controls. Results: We found a slightly increased risk for NHL in smokers (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0–1.4 for ever smokers), but a consistent positive association was shown only for follicular NHL. In this subtype, a significant excess risk was observed for ever versus never smokers, after adjustment for gender, age, geographic residence, education, and respondent (OR = 1.8, 95%, CI 1.3–2.7), with a positive exposure–response gradient for smoking duration (p<0.01). The risk for follicular NHL was significantly elevated only among women, with ever smokers showing OR = 2.3 (CI 1.4–3.8), while for men we found OR = 1.3 (CI 0.69–2.3). No major differences were shown according to age. Female subjects also showed significant positive exposure–response trends for duration. Conclusion: Cigarette smoking could be a risk factor for follicular NHL among women. For HD, MM, or LEU, no clear association was observed.     

Cigarette smoking,glutathione-s-transferase M1 and t1 genetic polymorphisms,and breast cancer risk (United States)

Objective: It has been suggested that functional polymorphisms in genes encoding tobacco carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes may modify the relationship between tobacco smoking and breast cancer risk. We sought to determine if there is a gene–environment interaction between GSTM1 (GSTM1A and GSTM1B), and GSTT1 genotypes and cigarette smoking in the risk of breast cancer. Methods: Cases and controls were recruited in a case–control study conducted in Connecticut from 1994 to 1998. Cases were histologically confirmed, incident breast cancer patients, and controls were randomly selected from women histologically confirmed to be without breast cancer. A total of 338 cases and 345 controls were genotyped for GSTM1 and GSTT1. Results: None of the GSTM1 genotypes, either alone or in combination with cigarette smoking, was associated with breast cancer risk. There was, however, a significantly increased risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women with a GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–2.9). There were also indications of increased risk of breast cancer associated with cigarette smoking for postmenopausal women with GSTT1-null genotype, especially for those who commenced smoking before age 18 (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.0–8.8). Conclusion: Women with a GSTT1-null genotype may have an increased breast cancer risk, especially postmenopausal women who started smoking at younger ages.     

The role of tobacco, snuff and alcohol use in the aetiology of cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia

While tobacco and alcohol are established risk factors for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, their roles in the aetiology of the increasingly common oesophageal adenocarcinoma remains uncertain. We tested the association between tobacco, snuff and alcohol use and the risk of oesophageal and cardia cancer in a nationwide, population-based case-control study in Sweden. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 618 (81% of all eligible) patients (189 oesophageal adenocarcinoma, 262 cardia adenocarcinoma and 167 oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma) and 820 control subjects. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression with multivariate adjustments for potential confounding. The risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma was not associated with snuff or alcohol use, and the association with smoking was weak or absent. Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma was dose-dependently associated with smoking (OR=4.2, 95% CI=2.5-7.0 among heavy smokers compared with never-smokers), but not with alcohol or snuff use. Oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma was strongly associated with tobacco, moderately with alcohol, but not with snuff use; combined use of tobacco and alcohol entailed a strongly increased risk (OR=23.1, 95% CI=9.6-56.0 among heavy users compared with never-users). We conclude that tobacco smoking, a strong risk factor for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and cardia adenocarcinoma, does not play an important role in the aetiology of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. None of the studied exposures can explain the increasing incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.     

Cigarette smoking and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (Australia)

Objectives: We studied the association between cigarette smoking and ovarian cancer in a population-based case–control study. Methods: A total of 794 women with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer who were aged 18–79 years and resident in one of three Australian states were interviewed, together with 855 controls aged 18–79 years selected at random from the electoral roll from the same states. Information was obtained about cigarette smoking and other factors including age, parity, oral contraceptive use, and reproductive factors. We estimated the relative risk of ovarian cancer associated with cigarette smoking, accounting for histologic type, using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding factors. Results: Women who had ever smoked cigarettes were more likely to develop ovarian cancer than women who had never smoked (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–1.9). Risk was greater for ovarian cancers of borderline malignancy (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.4–4.1) than for invasive tumors (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.2–2.4) and the histologic subtype most strongly associated overall was the mucinous subtype among both current smokers (OR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.8–5.7) and past smokers (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.3–3.9). Conclusions: These data extend recent findings and suggest that cigarette smoking is a risk factor for ovarian cancer, especially mucinous and borderline mucinous types. From a public health viewpoint, this is one of the few reports of a potentially avoidable risk factor for ovarian cancer.     

A pooled analysis of case–control studies of thyroid cancer: cigarette smoking and consumption of alcohol, coffee, and tea

Objective: To analyze the role of smoking, alcohol, coffee and tea in relation to thyroid cancer, we conducted a pooled analysis of 14 case–control studies conducted in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Methods: The sample consisted of 2725 thyroid cancer cases (2247 females, 478 males) and 4776 controls (3699 females, 1077 males). Conditional logistic regression with stratification on study, age at diagnosis, and gender was used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Thyroid cancer risk was reduced in persons who had ever smoked. The relationship was more pronounced in current smokers (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.6–0.7) than former smokers (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.8–1.1). There were significant trends of reduced risk with greater duration and frequency of smoking. For consumption of wine and beer, there was a significant trend of decreasing thyroid cancer risk (p = 0.02) that was not maintained after adjustment for current smoking (p = 0.12). Thyroid cancer risk was not associated with consumption of coffee or tea. These findings were consistent in both gender-specific and histology-specific (papillary and follicular) analyses. Conclusions: Pooled analyses of these geographically diverse case–control data indicate a reduced thyroid cancer risk associated with current smoking. A reduced risk associated with alcohol was eliminated after adjustment for smoking, and caffeinated beverages did not alter thyroid cancer risk.     

Cigar and pipe smoking and lung cancer risk: a multicenter study from Europe

BACKGROUND: Because limited information is available on the quantitative association between consumption of tobacco products other than cigarettes and lung cancer risk, we undertook a case-control study of this relationship. METHODS: We investigated lung cancer risk among smokers of cigars and/or cigarillos only and of pipes only and compared these risks with the risk of smokers of cigarettes only in a case-control study conducted in seven European areas. Our study population consisted of 5621 male case patients with lung cancer and 7255 male control subjects. Each subject or his proxy was interviewed with respect to the subject's smoking history and other risk factors for lung cancer. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) for smoking cigars and cigarillos only was 9.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.8-14.1), based on 43 exposed case patients and 77 exposed control subjects, and the OR for smoking a pipe only was 7.9 (95% CI = 5.3-11.8), representing 61 case patients and 129 control subjects. The OR for smoking cigarettes only was 14.9 (95% CI = 12.3-18.1), based on 4204 case patients and 3930 control subjects. A dose-response relationship was present for duration of use and cumulative consumption both for cigars and cigarillos and for pipe tobacco. An effect was also suggested for inhalation of cigar and cigarillo smoke. The dose-response relationships between lung cancer risk and either duration of smoking or average and cumulative consumption were similar for cigar and cigarillo smoking, pipe smoking, and cigarette smoking. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that smoking of European cigars, cigarillos, and pipe tobacco might exert a carcinogenic effect on the lung comparable to that of cigarettes.     

Tobacco, alcohol and the risk of gastric cancer by sub-site and histologic type.

Few studies have provided information on the role of smoking and alcohol in the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer by sub-site and histologic type. The relationship of snuff dipping with risk of gastric cancer has also been rarely studied. In a population-based case-control study conducted in 5 counties of Sweden from February 1989 to January 1995, a total of 90 cases of gastric cardia cancer, 260 and 164 cases of distal gastric cancer of intestinal and diffuse types, respectively, and 1164 frequency-matched control subjects were personally interviewed about life-time smoking, use of smokeless tobacco and use of alcohol 20 years ago. Current smokers had a higher risk than never-smokers for all 3 kinds of gastric adenocarcinoma [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.1 for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma; OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7 for distal gastric cancer of intestinal type; and OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.5 for distal gastric cancer of diffuse type], and the risk rose with increasing dose and duration of smoking among current smokers. However, no elevated risk was observed for ex-smokers. Neither intake of alcoholic beverages nor snuff dipping was associated with an increased risk of any type of cardia or gastric cancer. Our study did not support the hypothesis that the role of tobacco differs by sub-site and histologic sub-type of gastric cancer.     

Lung cancer trends in young adults: an early indicator of progress in tobacco control (United States)

Objective: Tobacco smoking is known to increase lung cancer occurrence beginning in young adulthood, although age-specific rates have not been used to monitor the early consequences of tobacco control efforts in the United States. We evaluated state trends in lung cancer death rates among young adults in relation to an index of state tobacco control activities and conventional indices of current smoking and cessation. Methods: We calculated lung cancer death rates in young adults (age 30–39 years) over two time intervals from 1990–1994 through 1995–1999 in states with at least 25 deaths per interval. We measured the correlation of an index of state tobacco control in 1992–1993 with absolute rates and with total percent change during the two time intervals. Results: Both lung cancer death rates during the recent time interval (1995–1999) and the change in these rates from 1990–1994 correlated strongly and inversely with the index of state tobacco control efforts measured in 1992–1993. Lung cancer death rates decreased in states with high tobacco control efforts, but increased in states with low tobacco control efforts. Tobacco control indices were strongly and positively correlated with cessation of smoking by age 30–39 years. Conclusions: Lung cancer death rates among young adults are strongly and inversely correlated with recent indices of tobacco control. Future monitoring of the effectiveness of statewide comprehensive tobacco control programs should assess trends in lung cancer rates in young adults as well as youth and adult smoking prevalence.     

A meta-analysis of asthma and risk of lung cancer (United States)

Objective: To review epidemiologic evidence that asthma is a risk factor for lung cancer, with particular attention to the role of smoking on this association. Methods: Through MEDLINE computer searches (January 1966 to April 2002) and a review of references, we identified studies with quantitative data on the relation of asthma to lung cancer. Summary estimates of relative risks (RR) were calculated using the fixed-effects model or the random-effects model as appropriate. Results: The combined results from five case–control studies – that presented data limited to individuals who had never smoked – showed a 1.8-fold increase in lung cancer risk among asthmatics (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3–2.3). The results from six case–control and four cohort studies, which controlled for smoking history also were significant (RR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3–2.2). Finally, to illustrate the potential confounding by tobacco, we combined data from seven cohort studies that did not control for smoking history and found an overall RR of 1.4 (95% CI = 1.2–1.6). Conclusions: The increased risk of lung cancer among never smoking individuals with asthma supports a direct relation between asthma and lung cancer. There is biological evidence to support this association.     

The TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and lung cancer risk in a population of Northern Spain

Polymorphisms in tumor suppressor genes might contribute to the individual susceptibility to develop different types of cancer. Alterations in genes involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis, as tumor suppressor gene TP53, can lead to malignant transformations increasing the risk of developing cancer. We have investigated effects of polymorphism Arg72Pro on lung cancer risk, focusing on smoking and histology. Our study is a hospital-based case-control study designed with 589 lung cancer patients mainly with squamous cell carcinoma (215), adenocarcinoma (156) and small cell carcinoma (90), and 582 control subjects, matched in ethnicity, age and gender. Genotypes were determined by PCR-RFLP and the results were analysed using multivariate unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender and smoking status. The analysis showed a statistically significant increase of lung cancer risk in Pro carriers (Arg/Pro and Pro/Pro) (adjusted OR=1.32; 95% CI=1.03-1.69), especially for ever smokers (adjusted OR=1.34; 95% CI=1.04-1.73), heavy smokers (adjusted OR=1.48; 95% CI=1.01-2.16) and smokers of exclusively black tobacco (adjusted OR=1.45; 95% CI=1.04-2.00). Moreover, Pro carriers present an increased risk of developing small cell lung cancer (adjusted OR=1.70; 95% CI=1.07-2.69) and cancer in stage IV for NSCLC (adjusted OR=1.56; 95% CI=1.07-2.27). Our results suggest that polymorphism Arg72Pro in tumor suppressor gene TP53 increases the risk of lung cancer. The effect is especially strong for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and heavy smokers.