Inducibility of atrial fibrillation during atrioventricular pacing with varying intervals: role of atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving VVI pacemakers have a higher incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) than those receiving DDD pacemakers. However, the mechanism behind the difference is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system play a role in the occurrence of AF during AV pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 28 patients who had (group I, n = 15) or did not have (group II, n = 13) AF induced by a single extrastimulus during pacing with different AV intervals. Atrial pressure, atrial size, atrial effective refractory periods, and atrial dispersion were evaluated during pacing with different AV intervals. Twenty-four-hour heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity also were examined. Atrial pressure, atrial size, effective refractory periods in the right posterolateral atrium and distal coronary sinus, and atrial dispersion increased as the AV interval shortened from 160 to 0 msec. During AV pacing, group I patients had greater minimal (52+/-17 vs 25+/-7 msec; P < 0.005) and maximal (76+/-16 vs 36+/-9 msec; P < 0.005) atrial dispersion than group II patients. The differences in atrial size and atrial dispersion among different AV intervals were greater in patients with AF than in those without AF. Baroreflex sensitivity (6.6+/-1.7 vs 3.9+/-1.0; P < 0.00005), but not heart rate variability, was higher in patients with AF than in those without AF. CONCLUSION: Abnormal atrial electrophysiology and higher vagal reflex activity can play important roles in the genesis of AF in patients receiving pacemakers.     

High-density biatrial pacing protects against atrial fibrillation by synchronizing left atrial tissue

Purpose  

The induction and sustainability of atrial fibrillation (AF) are most commonly due to pulmonary vein (PV) triggers and left atrial (LA) substrate. We hypothesized that simultaneous pacing of the PV ostia, LA, and right atrium (RA) reduces AF susceptibility by synchronizing atrial activity.     

Temporary atrial epicardial pacing as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have reported the use of temporary epicardial atrial pacing as prophylaxis for postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pacing therapies for prevention of postoperative AF using meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a computerized MEDLINE search, eight pacing prophylaxis trials with 776 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Trials compared control patients to patients randomized to right atrial, left atrial, or biatrial pacing used in conjunction with either fixed high-rate pacing or overdrive pacing. Overdrive biatrial pacing (OR 2.6, CI 1.4-4.8), overdrive right atrial pacing (OR 1.8, CI 1.1-2.7), and fixed high-rate biatrial pacing (OR 2.5, CI 1.3-5.1) demonstrated a significant antiarrhythmic effect for prevention of AF after open heart surgery. Furthermore, studies investigating overdrive left atrial pacing and fixed high-rate right atrial pacing have been underpowered to assess efficacy. CONCLUSION: Biatrial overdrive and fixed high-rate pacing and right atrial fixed high-rate pacing reduced the risk of new-onset AF after open heart surgery, and the relative risk reduction is approximately 2.5-fold. These results imply that various pacing algorithms are useful as a nonpharmacologic method to prevent postoperative AF.     

Adipocytes modulate the electrophysiology of atrial myocytes: implications in obesity-induced atrial fibrillation

Obesity is an important risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Increased epicardial adipose tissue in obesity can enhance inflammation and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AF. However, it is not clear whether epicardial adipocytes directly modulate the electrophysiological characteristics of atrial myocytes. Whole-cell patch clamp was used to record the action potentials (APs) and ionic currents in isolated rabbit left atrium (LA) myocytes incubated with and without (control) isolated adipocytes from epicardial, retrosternal, or abdominal adipose tissues, or adipocytes-conditioned supernatant for 2-4?h. Compared to control LA myocytes (n?=?22), LA myocytes incubated with epicardial (n?=?17), retrosternal (n?=?18), or abdominal adipocytes (n?=?22) had longer (80?±?3, 109?±?6, 109?±?6, and 110?±?7?ms, p??0.05) in comparison to control myocytes. Epicardial adipocyte-incubated LA myocytes had larger late sodium currents, L-type calcium currents, and transient outward potassium currents, but smaller delayed rectifier potassium and inward rectifier potassium currents than control LA myocytes. Moreover, isoproterenol (10?nM) induced a higher incidence (67 vs. 22?%, p?相似文献   

迷走神经性房颤大鼠模型的建立及心房电生理学研究

目的 探索房颤（AF）模型发生维持机制的关键病理环节建立稳定AF模型。 方法 选取健康雄性SD大鼠40只，将体质量均衡大鼠随机分为对照组、模型1组、模型2组及模型3组，每组10只（n=10）共4组，分别以不同浓度和天数尾静脉给予乙酰胆碱-氯化钙（ACh-CaCl₂）溶液，进行造模条件优选。以Langendorff恒温恒流灌流系统，描记离体心电图，同时以S1S2程控刺激检测各组大鼠心房有效不应期（AERP）。运用Western blot方法检测AF模型大鼠心房肌Cav1.2蛋白表达程度。 结果 大鼠AF造模不同条件成功率分别为:模型1组为100%，模型2组70%，模型3组0；大鼠不同造模条件35 d后，AF维持时间比较:模型1组与模型2组，模型1组与模型3组，模型1组与对照组，模型2组与对照组差异均显著（P<0.05），大鼠造模后，各组AERP相比较，对照组>模型1组，模型2组>模型1组（P<0.05）；使用Western blot 检测，模型组大鼠及对照组大鼠心房肌Cav1.2表达量有变化。 结论 运用ACh（99 μg/mL），CaCl₂（10 mg/mL）这一给药浓度，持续尾静脉给药35 d，造模成功率较高，可诱发大鼠稳定AF模型。      

Suppression of atrial fibrillation by atrial pacing.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with an implanted pacemaker, but the role of atrial pacing in preventing AF is still unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (67.8+/-12.1 years) were enrolled: 54 with sick sinus syndrome (SSS), 11 with atrioventricular blocks (AVB), and 1 with SSS and AVB. The prevalence of AF was investigated. In 22 patients with AF, the AF burden was estimated under "back-up pacing" (40-50 beats/min), then under "atrial pacing" (60-85 beats/min). The prevalence of AF in the SSS group tended to be higher than that in the AVB group (48.1% vs 18.2%, p=0.06). The AF burden in patients with a percentage of atrial pacing (% atrial pacing) <50% was significantly greater than that in patients with % atrial pacing >or=50% (12.5+/-21.1% vs 4.2+/-10.3%, p<0.05). AF disappeared immediately after "atrial pacing" in 4 patients (18.2%). In 9 patients (40.9%), the AF burden decreased gradually, and AF disappeared in 6 patients (27.3%) after 207.9+/-130.2 days. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AF may be higher in patients with SSS than in those with AVB. Atrial pacing has a preventive effect on AF, and the effect of atrial pacing is not always immediate but is progressive in some patients.     

Septal atrial pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) produces significant morbidity and mortality. The current method of permanent pacing of the right atrium (RA) may cause delayed interatrial conduction and predispose to AF. We hypothesized that atrial septal pacing would reduce AF compared with high RA pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The patients were randomized into two groups. After randomization, patients received a dual-chamber rate-responsive device capable of mode-switching with advanced telemetry features. Devices were programmed in a standardized manner. To be eligible, the patients were required to have a conventional indication for a permanent pacemaker and recurrent paroxysmal AF. Group 1 was paced from high RA and Group 2 was paced from the atrial septum. Analysis of 43 patients who have completed 6 months of follow-up and 22 patients who completed 12 months of follow-up showed no significant differences in the number of mode-switching episodes or in AF burden between groups (P = NS by Mann-Whitney) although there was a trend for less AF with septal pacing. There were no differences in thresholds, sensing, or lead impedance. Lead parameters remained stable over time and there were no displacements of the electrodes after implantation. No patient experienced lead-related complications. A significant variability in AF burden was noted in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an atrial-active fixation lead on the atrial septum is safe and feasible. However, this study showed no significant difference between septal pacing and high atrial pacing, using the endpoints of AF duration and number of AF episodes.     

Biatrial pacing for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized prospective study into the suppression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using biatrial pacing

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was twofold: to assess whether biatrial pacing is superior to single-site pacing and capable of reducing the frequency of episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); and to compare pacing of the proximal coronary sinus (PCS) with the distal coronary sinus (DCS) and the effects of sequential or simultaneous biatrial pacing. BACKGROUND: Interatrial conduction abnormalities have a role in the initiation of PAF. Biatrial pacing alters the site and timing of atrial depolarization and may benefit those with drug-resistant PAF. METHODS: Nineteen patients with PAF who were intolerant of or refractory to medication were studied. All received right atrial (RA) and coronary sinus (CS) leads (either PCS or DCS). For three months the pacemaker was set in sensing mode only. Subsequently each patient completed three-month periods in random order in the following modes: RA pacing, CS pacing, biatrial pacing using inter-atrial delays of 15 and 70 ms. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received a benefit from one or more pacing modes. The greatest reduction in PAF episodes was seen during biatrial pacing, especially with leads sited at the high right atrium (HRA) and distal CS (p = 0.0048). There was no difference for sequential or simultaneous pacing. Three patients derived no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, biatrial pacing causes a significant decrease in atrial fibrillation episodes. Optimal lead sites were at the HRA and DCS. Simultaneous pacing conferred no benefit over sequential pacing.