Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke]

In this paper, results of the recent clinical trials were reviewed, and problems in treating patients with thrombolysis were discussed. Data generated from randomized controlled trials over the past few years have shown that acute intervention can improve neurological outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator has become established as an acute treatment for stroke. Intra-arterial thrombolysis is a developing modality for the treatment of the acute stroke that shows promise in restoring cerebral arterial supply. However, thrombolysis have not approved yet in any forms in Japan. Under this circumstance, thrombolysis should be carried out in GCP-compatible clinical trials, so far. The overall results of a clinical trial cannot necessarily generalized to all patients in the trial and all similar future patients. A difference between settings of a clinical trial and of general practice should be also noted. Early recognition of stroke symptoms and immediate transfer to a suitable treatment facility should bring thrombolysis to a larger number of stroke victims. Finally, successful treatment is due in part to selecting patients who are not at increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage based on clinical and imaging features, and therefore rapid in-hospital triage protocols are mandatory.     

Thrombolytic therapy of acute ischemic stroke during pregnancy

The authors report eight pregnant women with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis (rt-PA [recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator] or urokinase). Seven women recovered. Two extracranial and two asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages complicated treatment; one woman died of arterial dissection complicating angiography. Three patients had therapeutic abortions, two fetuses were miscarried, and two babies were delivered healthy. Although pregnant women may be treated safely with thrombolytics, risks and benefits to mother and fetus must be carefully weighed.     

Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: 3 h and beyond

The current status of thrombolytic therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration is intravenous recombinant plasminogen activator given within 3 h of the onset of ischemic stroke. Intra-arterial therapy is possible for up to 6 h but is not Food and Drug Administration-approved for this purpose. Based on current radiologic methods (i.e., magnetic resonance imaging and perfusion computed tomography scans), it is being increasingly realized that the time window for effective thrombolytic therapy is variable, and salvageable tissue in the form of the ischemic penumbra may exist for longer periods of time and could therefore offer a greater time window based on these imaging studies. Development of an effective neuroprotective drug would greatly enhance the stability of the penumbra and offer further opportunities for extending the time window for reperfusion.     

Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients with cardiac thrombus.

The authors describe the outcome of five patients with a cardiac thrombus selected among 183 patients with stroke (2.7 %) who were given IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). No early systemic or cerebral embolism occurred. Two patients made a complete recovery at 3 months. Two patients had a moderate outcome. One patient had late recurrent cerebral embolism and died. These data suggest that the presence of a cardiac thrombus is not associated with a high risk of recurrent embolism in patients with stroke who are given IV tPA.     

Thrombolytic therapy in an adolescent ischemic stroke

We report the case of a 16-year-old Caucasian girl who developed acute onset of left hemiplegia, left hemisensory deficit, and dysarthria. After a negative computed tomographic scan of the brain, the patient was given intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator according to established adult guidelines. The patient experienced a marked improvement within 24 hours. Stroke etiology was determined to be a paradoxical embolus via a patent foramen ovale associated with pelvic vein thrombosis. This case illustrates the importance of early recognition of stroke and the utility of thrombolytics in treating ischemic infarcts in the adolescent population.     

Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, clinical effect and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated in an acute stroke unit. METHODS: All patients admitted within 3 h after an acute ischaemic stroke were considered for thrombolysis. Twenty-four patients were treated. RESULTS: Ten patients demonstrated early clinical improvement compatible with a positive effect of thrombolysis. Five patients demonstrated a substantial but slow clinical improvement with an uncertain relationship to thrombolysis. Nine patients did not improve. One patient developed an intracerebral haematoma and 2 developed a haemorrhagic infarction without clinical deterioration. Five patients (21%) died within the first 3 months. At follow-up after 6 months, 10 patients (42%) had achieved independence [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2], 9 (33%) had an unfavourable outcome (mRS 3-5) and 5 patients (21%) had died. None of these 5 patients died due to a treatment complication. CONCLUSIONS: This study in a small patient population suggests that thrombolysis may be administered relatively safely in an acute stroke unit without intensive care facilities. The clinical effect and safety were similar to those which have been found in large randomised studies and clinical series.     

Thrombolytic and newer mechanical device treatment for acute ischemic stroke

For 8 years, only intravenous tissue plasminogen activator was approved by the US FDA for acute stroke treatment. The US FDA has now cleared the Merci Retriever (Concentric Medical, Inc.), a corkscrew-like device attached to a catheter, for the removal of clots causing ischemic strokes. Since the clearance was based on nonrandomized treatment trials, practitioners must scrutinize available data describing effects of the device on recanalization of the vessel, outcomes and important adverse events, such as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. This article reviews the study findings that are likely to contribute to current treatment decisions.     

Thrombolytic therapy in a patient with acute ischemic stroke caused by aortic dissection

The current medical literature indicates a poor outcome in patients with ischemic stroke in the presence of aortic dissection, especially in those who underwent thrombolytic therapy. We report a favorable outcome in a patient with acute stroke who received rt-PA and was later found to have Stanford type A aortic dissection.     

Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke in Asia: The first prospective evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous thrombolytic therapy has been widely recommended as a standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke in most clinical practice guidelines. However, the experience in Asia is still limited. We report the first prospective case series of thrombolytic therapy in a developing Asian country. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who presented within 3 h of onset were screened under stroke fast track program. Those who were eligible were treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). General and neurological examinations together with the National Institute of Health stroke scale (NHISS) and modified Rankin scale (MRS) were recorded prior to and after the treatment at 1 h, 24 h, on discharge and at 3 months. Hemorrhagic brain lesion and death within 3 months were also recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients or 2.1% of patients with acute stroke received intravenous thrombolysis. The mean pretreatment NIHSS was 18.8 and the majority of patients had stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory. The mean door-to-needle time was 72.6 min (ranged 20-150 min). Major neurological improvement, defined as improving of the NIHSS >8 points or NIHSS of 0 points at 24 h, was observed in 17 patients (50%). Intracerebral hemorrhage was detected in four cases (11.8%), two of them were symptomatic (5.9%) and one was fatal. CONCLUSION: Intravenous thrombolysis can be given in patients with acute stroke in our population. Our cases were more severe than other studies. However, half of them experienced major neurological improvement. The risk of hemorrhagic brain lesion is not much higher than previously reported.     

Developments in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke

Treatment for acute ischemic stroke has for years been frustrated by lack of efficacy. Despite a plethora of seemingly promising treatments from animal research, clinical application never came to fruition. Experience seems to indicate that the only truly effective treatment is the rapid restoration of perfusion to ischemic tissue prior to frank infarction. Unfortunately, every agent designed to achieve this goal met with the same ironic limitation; the ability to dissolve clot was coupled with the risk of causing intracerebral hemorrhage. Accordingly, stroke was addressed primarily through modification of risk factors and rehabilitation of the neurological sequelae. However, following the randomized trial of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) sponsored by the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) in 1995, the first proven effective therapy for acute stroke became available. The door was finally open to emergency treatment of stroke in the acute phase. Moreover, the positive results of the NINDS trial appear to be independent of age. Nevertheless, intravenous thrombolysis remains ineffective in the majority of patients treated and is withheld from an even larger population because of presentation outside of the 3-hour therapeutic window. As a result, effective therapy is not available for most patients presenting with acute stroke. Recent advancements in the evaluation and treatment of acute ischemic stroke, including intra-arterial thrombolysis, mechanical thrombolysis, and combination therapies, hold significant promise for a larger proportion of patients. New imaging technology may also improve our ability to identify patients with viable brain tissue who may derive the greatest benefit from these therapies.     

急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗研究进展

急性缺血性卒中发病率、病残率和病死率均较高,是目前对人类危害最严重的疾病之一。血管内治疗已获得临床充分肯定。血管内治疗适应证的选择、治疗时间窗的确定、机械取栓装置的选择对预后至关重要。本文拟对急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗研究进展进行阐述。     

Antithrombotic therapy in acute ischemic stroke]

The purpose of antithrombotic therapy is not to recanalyze obstruction but to prevent propagation of thrombus and reocclusion by rethrombosis in the brain arteries. There is no evidence of heparin or heparinoid to improve long-term outcome, although anticoagulant therapy might be indicated for stroke associated with coagulation activation such as progressing stroke, basilar artery thrombosis, cardioembolic stroke at high risk, coagulopathy, and arterial dissection. In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, there is no evidence of immediate anticoagulation with heparin to improve long-term outcome, which is rather contraindicated for large hemispheric stroke, and it is recommended to start warfarin directly in the safety issue. Aspirin is recommended in the guidelines of many countries, although the efficacy is modest. A clinical trial of the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab, which is a more potent antiplatelet agent than aspirin, had recently been conducted, although it was stopped because of the concern on the safety. Clinical trials of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and another antiplatelet agent are ongoing to compare efficacy and safety with aspirin monotherapy in Japan and overseas.