Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are becoming increasingly common medical problems in the developed world, often in the setting of the metabolic or insulin resistance syndrome (IRS). It is predicted that by the year 2025 > 25 million Americans may have NASH-related liver disease. NASH and NAFLD also affect the donor population. The use of steatotic donor livers for liver transplantation (LT) is associated with an increased risk of primary nonfunction (PNF) in the allograft. There is particular reluctance to use steatotic livers for living donor LT. There is indirect evidence to suggest that patients undergoing LT for cirrhosis resulting from NASH may have poorer outcome, despite careful selection of LT candidates. Indeed it is likely that many potential LT candidates with NASH are excluded from LT due to co-morbid conditions related to IRS. The post-LT patient is at risk of several components of IRS, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and obesity and there is increasing recognition of de novo and recurrent NAFLD and NASH after LT. Thus NAFLD and NASH affect all aspects of LT including donors, patients in evaluation and the LT recipient.     

Outcome After Liver Transplantation for NASH Cirrhosis

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated cirrhosis is an increasing indication for liver transplant (LT). The aim of this study was to determine outcome and poor predictive factors after LT for NASH cirrhosis. We analyzed patients undergoing LT from 1997 to 2008 at a single center. NASH was diagnosed on histopathology. LT recipients with hepatitis C, alcoholic or cholestatic liver disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis acted as matched controls.
Ninety-eight LT recipients were identified with NASH cirrhosis. Compared to controls, NASH patients had a higher BMI (mean 32.3 kg/m²), and were more likely to be diabetic and hypertensive. Mortality after transplant was similar between NASH patients and controls but there was a tendency for higher earlier mortality in NASH patients (30-day mortality 6.1%, 1-year mortality 21.4%). Sepsis accounted for half of all deaths in NASH patients, significantly higher than controls. NASH patients ≥60 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m² with diabetes and hypertension (HTN) had a 50% 1-year mortality.
In conclusion, patients undergoing LT for NASH cirrhosis have a similar outcome to patients undergoing LT for other indications. The combination of older age, higher BMI, diabetes and HTN are associated with poor outcome after LT. Careful consideration is warranted before offering LT to these high-risk patients.     

Female Liver Transplant Recipients with the Same GFR as Male Recipients Have Lower MELD Scores—A Systematic Bias

Women have lower glomerular filtration (GFR) than men for the same serum creatinine (Cr) value, not accounted for in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). We compare male/female Cr, GFR (using MDRD formula) and respective MELD scores in 403 Cr measurements using standard (sCr), O'Leary modified (mCr) and Compensated (cCr) Jaffe and Enzymatic (eCr) in 158 liver disease patients, mCr in 208 liver transplantation (LT) candidates, and EDTA-Cr(51)-GFR in 38 other candidates for LT; considering each female as male, a 'corrected' Cr was derived. MELD scores were calculated for measured and "corrected" Cr in females. Median Cr and GFR in females were lower than males (p < 0.05). Both MDRD and EDTA-Cr(51) GFR were lower in females than males, despite lower Cr values. In females, each MELD score was lower than the corresponding MELD-corrected Cr (p < 0.001) with > or =three-point difference in liver disease patients: 25%[sCr]; 23%[mCr]; 11%[eCr]; and 14%[cCr]. In 65% of female LT candidates, two- or three-point difference was found. Females with liver disease have lower GFR than males for the same Cr value; correcting Cr increases MELD score by two or three points in 65% of female LT candidates. MELD score adjustment in females would ensure equal LT priority by gender.     

Impact of MELD-based allocation on end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation

The proportion of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT), with concomitant renal dysfunction, markedly increased after allocation by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was introduced. We examined the incidence of subsequent post-LT end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before and after the policy was implemented. Data on all adult deceased donor LT recipients between April 27, 1995 and December 31, 2008 (n = 59 242), from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, were linked with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' ESRD data. Cox regression was used to (i) compare pre-MELD and MELD eras with respect to post-LT ESRD incidence, (ii) determine the risk factors for post-LT ESRD and (iii) quantify the association between ESRD incidence and mortality. Crude rates of post-LT ESRD were 12.8 and 14.5 per 1000 patient-years in the pre-MELD and MELD eras, respectively. Covariate-adjusted post-LT ESRD risk was higher in the MELD era (hazard ratio [HR]= 1.15; p = 0.0049). African American race, hepatitis C, pre-LT diabetes, higher creatinine, lower albumin, lower bilirubin and sodium >141 mmol/L at LT were also significant predictors of post-LT ESRD. Post-LT ESRD was associated with higher post-LT mortality (HR = 3.32; p < 0.0001). The risk of post-LT ESRD, a strong predictor of post-LT mortality, is 15% higher in the MELD era. This study identified potentially modifiable risk factors of post-LT ESRD. Early intervention and modification of these risk factors may reduce the burden of post-LT ESRD.     

Reduced Mortality with Right-Lobe Living Donor Compared to Deceased-Donor Liver Transplantation When Analyzed from the Time of Listing

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) is not yet a fully accepted therapy for patients with end-stage liver failure in the Western hemisphere because of concerns about donor safety and inferior recipient outcomes. An outcome analysis from the time of listing for all adult patients who were listed for liver transplantation (LT) at our center was performed. From 2000 to 2006, 1091 patients were listed for LT. One hundred fifty-four patients (LRD; 14%) had suitable live donors and 153 (99%) underwent RLDLT. Of the remaining patients (DD/Waiting List; n = 937), 350 underwent deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT); 312 died or dropped off the waiting list; and 275 were still waiting at the time of this analysis. The LRD group had shorter mean waiting times (6.0 months vs. 9.8 months; p < 0.001). Although medical model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were similar at the time of listing, MELD scores at LT were significantly higher in the DD/Waiting List group (15.4 vs. 19.5; p = 0.002). Patients in Group 1 had a survival advantage with RLDLT from the time of listing (1-year survival 90% vs. 80%; p < 0.001). To our knowledge, this is the first report to document a survival advantage at time of listing for RLDLT over DDLT.     

Cardiovascular mortality among liver transplant recipients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States—a retrospective study

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become an increasingly important indication for liver transplantation (LT), and there has been a particular concern of excessive cardiovascular‐related mortality in this group. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing‐Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (UNOS STAR) dataset, we reviewed data on 56,995 adult transplants (January 2002 through June 2013). A total of 3,170 NASH liver‐only recipients were identified and were matched with 3,012 non‐NASH HCV+ and 3,159 non‐NASH HCV? controls [matched 1:1 based on gender, age at LT (±3 years), and MELD score (±3)]. Cox regression analysis revealed significantly lower hazard of all‐cause (HR 0.669; P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular‐related mortality (HR 0.648; P < 0.0001) in the NASH compared to the non‐NASH group after adjusting for diabetes, BMI, and race. Relative to the non‐NASH HCV‐positive group, NASH group has lower hazard of all‐cause (HR 0.539; P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular‐related mortality (HR 0.491; P < 0001). A lower hazard of all‐cause mortality (HR 0.844; P = 0.0094) was also observed in NASH patients compared to non‐NASH HCV‐negative group, but cardiovascular mortality was similar (HR 0.892; P = 0.3276). LT recipients with NASH have either lower or similar risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular‐related mortality compared to its non‐NASH counterparts after adjusting for diabetes, BMI, and race.     

The liver recipient with acute renal dysfunction: A single institution evaluation of the simultaneous liver‐kidney transplant candidate

The Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) listing criteria for simultaneous liver‐kidney transplant (SLK) are not well defined. Concerns remain about rising numbers of SLKs, which divert quality kidneys from candidates awaiting kidney transplants (KT). We performed a retrospective review of liver transplants (LTs) at our center from 2004 to 2014; 127 recipients (liver transplant alone; 102 LTA, 25 SLK) were identified with short‐term preoperative kidney dysfunction (creatinine >4 mg/dL or preoperative hemodialysis [HD] for <6 weeks). Both cohorts had comparable baseline demographic characteristics with the exception of higher model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score in the LTA group (41.4 vs 32.9, P < .0001) and higher incidence of pre‐LT diabetes in the SLK cohort (52% vs 26.5%, P = .0176). Duration of pre‐LT HD was higher in SLK recipients, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .39). Renal nonrecovery (RNR) rate in LTA cohort was low (<5%). No significant difference was noted in 1‐year mortality, liver graft rejection/failure, or length of stay (LOS) between the cohorts. Thus, it appears that liver recipients with short‐term (<6 weeks) HD or AKI without HD have comparable outcomes between LTA and SLK. With provisions for a KT safety net, as proposed by OPTN, LTA may be the most adequate option for these patients.     

Role of Pretransplant Echocardiographic Evaluation in Predicting Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation

Maintenance of cardiac function is critical to the survival of patients with end‐stage liver disease after liver transplantation (LT). We sought to determine whether pre‐LT echocardiographic indices of right heart structure and function were independently predictive of morbidity and mortality post‐LT. We retrospectively studied 216 consecutive patients who underwent pre‐LT 2‐dimensional/Doppler echocardiography with subsequent LT from 2007 to 2010. A blinded reader analyzed multiple echocardiographic parameters, including right ventricular structure and function, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and the presence and severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). On univariate analysis, Model of End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, PASP, presence of ≥mild TR, post–operative renal replacement therapy (RRT) and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were found to be significant predictors of adverse outcomes. On multivariate analysis, only ≥mild TR was found to predict both patient mortality (p = 0.0024, HR = 3.91, 95% CI: 1.62–9.44) and graft failure (p = 0.0010, HR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.70–8.06). PASP and MELD correlated with post‐LT intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) and, along with hemodialysis, were associated with hospital LOS and time on ventilator. In conclusion, pre‐LT echocardiographic assessments of the right heart may be useful in predicting post‐LT morbidity and mortality and guiding the selection of appropriate LT candidates.     

The Impact of MELD/PELD Revisions on the Mortality of Liver–Intestine Transplantation Candidates

Patients listed for liver–intestine transplantation suffer higher waiting list mortality than those listed for liver‐only, thus leading to policy revisions seeking to close the gap. We sought to determine the impact of key model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD)/pediatric end‐stage liver disease (PELD) policy modifications on the waiting list mortality of adult and pediatric liver–intestine candidates as compared to liver‐only candidates. Analysis of UNOS data separated into adult and pediatric categories and based on time periods of policy implementation revealed higher mortality in liver–intestine candidates over all time periods studied (p < 0.001 pediatric and adult). After implementation of a revision to augment their MELD scores based on a sliding scale, adult liver–intestine candidates with calculated MELD > 15 no longer suffered higher mortality although this change did not completely eliminate the mortality disparity for candidates with MELD < 15 (p < 0.01). The waiting list mortality of pediatric liver–intestine candidates dropped significantly after a revision that gave them 23 additional MELD/PELD points (p < 0.01) although the mortality disparity with pediatric liver‐only candidates was not eliminated. Following this revision, mortality in pediatric liver‐only and liver–intestine Status 1 candidates was similar, however more liver–intestine candidates were listed as Status 1B. This data demonstrates that a mortality disparity remains for liver–intestine candidates compared with candidates listed for liver‐only .     

Assessing Variation in the Costs of Care Among Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation

Previous economic analyses of liver transplantation have focused on the cost of the transplant and subsequent care. Accurate characterization of the pretransplant costs, indexed to severity of illness, is needed to assess the economic burden of liver disease. A novel data set linking Medicare claims with transplant registry data for 15 710 liver transplant recipients was used to determine average monthly waitlist spending (N = 249 434 waitlist months) using multivariable linear regression models to adjust for recipient characteristics including Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Characteristics associated with higher spending included older age, female gender, hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes, hypertension and increasing MELD score (p < 0.05 for all). Spending increased exponentially with severity of illness: expected monthly spending at a MELD score of 30 was 10 times higher than at MELD of 20 ($22 685 vs. $2030). Monthly spending within MELD strata also varied geographically. For candidates with a MELD score of 35, spending varied from $19 548 (region 10) to $36 099 (region 7). Regional variation in waitlist costs may reflect the impact of longer waiting times on greater pretransplant hospitalization rates among high MELD score patients. Reducing the number of high MELD waitlist patients through improved medical management and novel organ allocation systems could decrease total spending for end‐stage liver care.     

Screening colonoscopy in liver transplant candidates: risks and findings

The indication for mandatory screening colonoscopies in liver transplant candidates is controversial. Since the introduction of MELD‐based allocation, patients with advanced liver disease and often severe comorbidities are prioritized for liver transplantation (LT). This study evaluated safety and outcome of colonoscopy in this high‐risk patient group. During a two‐yr period, we performed 243 colonoscopies in potential LT candidates. Endoscopic findings were registered in a standardized form, and correlations with biochemical or clinical parameters were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U‐test and chi‐square test. Only 57 patients (23.5%) had an endoscopically normal colon. Main findings were polyps (45.7%), hypertensive colopathy (24.3%), diverticulosis (21%), rectal varices (19.8%), and hemorrhoids (13.6%). In 21% of all patients, the removed polyps were diagnosed as adenomas. The prevalence of neoplastic polyps increased significantly with age: 13.6% (patients <50 yr) vs. 25% (patients ≥50 yr) (p = 0.03). Advanced neoplasia was found only in patients older than 40 yr. No major complications were observed; post‐interventional hemorrhage was observed in 1.7% and controlled by clipping or injection therapy. In conclusion, lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is safe and effective in LT candidates. Due to the age dependency of neoplastic polyps, a screening colonoscopy should be performed in LT candidates older than 40 yr or with symptoms or additional risk factors.     

Improved survival outcomes in patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic liver disease following liver transplantation: an analysis of 2002–2012 United Network for Organ Sharing data

There is an increasing trend of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease undergoing liver transplantation in the US. Our study utilized data from the 2002 to 2012 United Network for Organ Sharing registry to evaluate model for end‐stage liver disease era trends in US liver transplantations focused on patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), hepatitis C (HCV), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), and HCC. Survival outcomes were stratified by liver disease etiology and compared across time periods using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Patients with NASH were more likely to be women, had higher body mass index (BMI), and had higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiac disease. However, overall long‐term survival was significantly higher in patients with NASH and ALD (p < 0.001). Compared to HCV, patients with NASH had significantly higher post‐transplantation survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63–0.77), and lower risk of graft failure (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69–0.83). Despite having higher BMI and higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiac disease, patients with NASH had better post‐liver transplantation survival compared to patients with HCV or HCC. Patients with ALD also had superior survival outcomes. However, these survival differences were limited to patients without HCC that underwent liver transplantation.     

Steroid minimization in liver transplant recipients: impact on hepatitis C recurrence and post-transplant diabetes

BACKGROUND: Steroid minimization regimens have become increasingly popular for kidney transplant recipients. We studied outcomes for liver transplant recipients with a regimen using rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP). RESULTS: The study group consisted of 83 recipients transplanted between June 2004 and January 2006. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, MMF, and two doses of basiliximab with six d of steroids. Patients with underlying autoimmune disorders (PSC, autoimmune hepatitis) were not included as they were maintained on steroids. The control group consisted of 83 recipients transplanted between January 2002 and May 2004. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, MMF and steroids, with no antibody induction. Mean MELD score at time of transplant was significantly higher in the steroid free group vs. the control group (28 vs. 23, p = 0.02); mean donor age was also higher (42 vs. 37 yr, p = 0.02). Other characteristics including recipient age, cold ischemic time, donor source, and cause of liver disease were similar (p = ns). Mean length of follow-up was 16.1 months in the RDP group and 32 months in the control group; a minimum of six months follow up was present for all patients. Patient and graft survival rates were not statistically different in the two groups (p = ns). Biopsy proven rejection was low in both groups and not significantly different (at one yr post-transplant 11% in the RDP group vs. 12% in control, p = 0.53). Based on protocol biopsy data, histologic recurrence of hepatitis C was demonstrated in 56% of the control group hepatitis C positive recipients vs. 39% in the RDP group (p = 0.05). There was a significantly lower incidence of post-transplant diabetes (PTDM) in the RDP vs. control group (at 6 months post-transplant 12% vs. 32%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid discontinuation of prednisone in liver transplant recipients is not associated with an increased risk of rejection, and may be associated with lower morbidity, especially PTDM and hepatitis C recurrence.     

Impact of implementation of the MELD scoring system on the prevalence and incidence of chronic renal disease following liver transplantation.

The implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score decreased mortality of those awaiting liver transplantation (LT); however, the impact of the MELD allocation system on the risk of chronic renal disease after LT remains unknown. We conducted a non-concurrent single-center cohort study of 174 patients undergoing LT at our center. We compared patients who underwent LT one year prior to MELD implementation (pre-MELD cohort) to those patients who underwent LT 1 year following MELD implementation (MELD cohort). All patients were followed for at least 2 years after LT. Stage 3 chronic renal disease (CRD-3) was defined by an estimated creatinine clearance (CL(Cr)) below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, and stage 4 chronic renal disease (CRD-4) was defined by an estimated CL(Cr) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the validated Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Requirement of kidney transplantation and need for hemodialysis were also evaluated following LT. The pre-MELD cohort (n=97) and the MELD cohort (n=77) were comparable in baseline characteristics, prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, and immunosuppression. Mean calculated MELD score in the pre-MELD cohort was significantly lower than in the MELD cohort (16 vs. 19, P < 0.05). The estimated CL(Cr) at time of LT was lower in the MELD cohort compared with the pre-MELD cohort (75 vs. 95, P < 0.01). However, the incidence and prevalence of CRD-3 and CRD-4 at 6, 12, and 24 months after LT were comparable between the two cohorts. Need for kidney transplantation or hemodialysis after LT was comparable between the groups. In multivariate analysis, serum creatinine at LT was the only variable associated with the development of CRD-3 in the first 2 years after LT. In conclusion, the implementation of the MELD allocation system is not associated with increased mortality or occurrence of CRD-3 or CRD-4 in the first 2 years after LT.     

The Economic Impact of MELD on Liver Transplant Centers

Adoption of the model for end stage liver disease (MELD) system prioritized patients awaiting liver transplant (LT) by severity of illness including progressive renal dysfunction. Unfortunately, current reimbursement for LT is not adjusted by severity of illness or need for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). This study examines hospital cost and reimbursement for LT and LKT to determine the effect of MELD on transplant center (TC) financial outcomes given current reimbursement practices as well as DRG outlier threshold limits. LT was performed for 86 adults prior to and 127 following the implementation of MELD. Between the eras, there was a substantial increase in the average laboratory MELD score (17.1 to 20.7 p=0.004) and percentage of LKTs performed (5.8% to 17.3% p=0.01). Increasing MELD score was associated with higher costs ($4309 per MELD point p<0.001) and decreasing TC net income ($1512 per MELD point p<0.001). In patients not achieving the Medicare outlier status, predicted net loss was $17,700 for high-MELD patients and $19,133 for those needing LKT. In conclusion, contractual reimbursement agreements that are not indexed by severity of disease may not reflect the increased costs resulting from the MELD system. Even with outlier thresholds, Medicare reimbursement is inadequate resulting in a net loss for the TC.     

Split‐liver transplantation in the high‐MELD adult patient: are we being too cautious?

The fear that patients with high-mathematical model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score may not be suitable candidates for segmental grafts because of their need for greater liver mass has continued to push the transplant community toward the use of whole LT (WLT) in preference to split LT (SLT). In order to define the outcome of segmental liver transplantation in a better manner in high-MELD patients (score ≥26), we queried the UNOS registry for graft and patient survival results according to MELD score in adult patients receiving WLT and SLT in the United States from the inception of MELD allocation (February 27, 2002) through March 9, 2007. A total of 316 adult patients received a SLT as compared with 20 778 WLTs. Patient and graft survival rates at 6 and 12 months were comparable for all MELD ranges, including the 'high-MELD' recipients (e.g. at MELD score 31–35, patients' and grafts' survival rates at 12 months was 87.5% in SLT group vs. 84.4% and 76.7% in WLT group respectively). The results even at higher MELD scores (i.e. >35) were more than acceptable. In conclusion, patient and graft survival rates for SLT in high-MELD adult patients are comparable to the same for WLT.     

Impact of recipient morbid obesity on outcomes after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of morbid obesity in recipients on peritransplant resource utilization and survival outcomes. Using a linkage between the University HealthSystem Consortium and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases, we identified 12 445 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) between 2007 and 2011 and divided them into two cohorts based on recipient body mass index (BMI; <40 vs. ≥40 kg/m²). Recipients with BMI ≥40 comprised 3.3% (n = 416) of all LTs in the studied population. There were no significant differences in donor characteristics between two groups. Recipients with BMI ≥40 were significant for being female, diabetic, and with NASH cirrhosis. Patients with a BMI ≥40 had a higher median MELD score, limited physical capacity, and were more likely to be hospitalized at LT. BMI ≥40 recipients had higher post‐LT length of stay and were less often discharged to home. With a median follow‐up of 2 years, patient and graft survival were equivalent between the two groups. In conclusion, morbidly obese LT recipients appear sicker at time of LT with an increase in resource utilization but have similar short‐term outcomes.     

Effect of the aetiology and severity of liver disease on oral health and dental treatment prior to transplantation

Elimination of dental infection foci has been recommended before liver transplantation (LT) because lifelong immunosuppression may predispose to infection spread. Association between pre‐LT oral health and the aetiology and severity of chronic liver disease (CLD) was investigated retrospectively. A total of 212 adult patients (median age 51.1) who had received LT during 2000–2006 in Finland were included. Their oral health had been pre‐operatively examined. Patients were divided into seven different CLD groups. Common indications for LT were primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC 25.5%), alcohol cirrhosis (ALCI 17.5%) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC 14.6%). Patients were also categorized by the Model for End stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system. Medical, dental and panoramic jaw x‐ray data were analysed between groups. PBC patients had the lowest number of teeth with significant difference to PSC patients (19.7 vs. 25.6, P < 0.005, anova , t‐test). ALCI patients had the highest number of tooth extractions with significant difference in comparison to PSC patients (5.6 vs. 2.5, P < 0.005). Lower MELD score resulted in fewer tooth extractions but after adjusting for several confounding factors, age was the most important factor associated with extractions (P < 0.005). The aetiology of CLD associated with the oral health status and there was a tendency towards worse dental health with higher MELD scores.     

HCC Patients Suffer Less From Geographic Differences in Organ Availability

It has been suggested that the number of exception model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) overestimates mortality risk. Average MELD at transplant, a measure of organ availability, correlates with mortality on an intent‐to‐treat basis and varies by donation service area (DSA). We analyzed Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2005 to 2010, comparing transplant and death parameters for patients transplanted with HCC exception points to patients without HCC diagnosis (non‐HCC), to determine whether the two groups were impacted differentially by DSA organ availability. HCC candidates are transplanted at higher rates than non‐HCC candidates and are less likely to die on the waitlist. Overall risk of death trends downward by 1% per MELD point (p = 0.65) for HCC, but increases by 7% for non‐HCC patients (p < 0.0001). The difference in the change of mortality with MELD is statistically significant between HCC and non‐HCC candidates p < 0.0001. Posttransplant risk of death trends downward by 2% per MELD point (p = 0.28) for HCC patients, but increases by 3% per MELD point in non‐HCC patients (p = 0.027), with the difference being statistically significant with p < 0.005. In summary, increasing wait time impacts HCC candidates less than non‐HCC candidates and under increased competition for donor organs, HCC candidates' advantage increases.     

MELD评分系统在肝移植中的应用和意义

目的 讨论终末期肝病模型（MELD）的产生与发展，评价对肝移植的影响。方法回顾性分析MELD在肝移植应用中的有关文献。结果MELD广泛应用于预测和评定终末期肝病的严重程度及患者等待肝移植期间死亡危险度，以决定器官分配的优先顺序。结论MELD为新的评分系统，可减少患者等待肝移植的时间，客观地、精确地预测终末期肝病患者的短期生存率和死亡危险度，是较为理想的器官分配评分系统。