Associação clonidina‐bupivacaína na anestesia peridural caudal para cirurgia de hipospádia em crianças: estudo prospectivo,randomizado, encoberto

Background and objectives

The combination of clonidine with local anesthetic administered for epidural anesthesia via caudal route seems to improve the quality of postoperative analgesia, but with conflicting results. This study compared the postoperative analgesia of three different doses of clonidine combined with bupivacaine in caudal epidural anesthesia in children undergoing hypospadias repair.

Prospective to a randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess efficacy of double caudal analgesia in hypospadias repair

Background/Purpose: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of double-caudal versus single-caudal injection for postoperative analgesia in hypospadias repair was performed. Methods: Between October 1998 and September 2000, 160 boys underwent distal hypospadias repair. The first 80 boys were analyzed prospectively for postoperative analgesia after double-caudal bupivacaine, which involves the administration of a second bupivacaine injection into the caudal extradural space at the end of surgery. Pain was assessed using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS). The study groups were: group 1, unstented Thiersch-Duplay urethroplasty (50); and group 2, stented Mathieu type repair (30). Results of this cohort formed the basis for a prospective, randomised, double-blind control trial comparing double-caudal against a single injection before operation. The further 80 patients were allocated randomly: group 3, single caudal injection of 1 mL kg^{[minus ]1} of 0.25% plain bupivacaine at the start of surgery with unstented Thiersh-Duplay repair (25); group 4, similar single caudal injection but stented Mattieu type operation (15); group 5, second caudal and at end of operation (0.5 mL kg^{[minus ]1} on each occasion) with unstented Thiersh-Duplay repair (25); and group 6, similar to group 5 but with stented Mattieu type repair (15). Results: Patient demographics (age and weight) and mean duration of operative time were similar for all groups. There was no significant difference in early pain scores at 0 to 2 hours with a good correlation coefficient (r = 0.88). At 4, 6, and 8 hours there was a significant difference in pain scores between double and single caudals (P [lt ] .05). There was a significant difference in mean duration of caudal analgesia and need for oral analgesia between single caudal 3.45 versus 7.85 hours for double caudal (P [lt ] .001). Mean duration of caudal analgesia and requirement for oral analgesia after single caudal in group 3 (unstented) was 3.5 versus 3.4 hours in group 4 (stented). In double caudals this lengthened to 9.4 hours in group 5 (unstented) versus 6.3 hours in group 6 (stented; P [lt ] .05). This also was significant when operation time was excluded. Conclusions: A prospective study of double caudal analgesia showed good postoperative pain control after hypospadias surgery. This was followed by a prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial that has confirmed that double caudal injection of bupivacaine prolonged the duration of pain relief after hypospadias repair. The second or top-up caudal did not increase the total dose but supplemented and prolonged postoperative analgesia.     

Caudal clonidine and bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children

Background: Clonidine produces analgesia by actions on α₂-ad-renoceptors and enhances both sensory and motor blockade from epidural injection of local anaesthetics. Low-dose clonidine has been used so far for caudal injection in children. Our aim was to study the perioperative effects of high-dose caudal clonidine when added to low concentration of bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children. Methods: After induction of general anaesthesia caudal block was performed either with 1 ml kg^-1 bupivacaine 0.175% with the addition of clonidine 5 μg kg^-1 (n=20), or with 1 ml kg^-1bupivacaine 0.175% (n=20). The intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, the perioperative haemodynamic effects, respiratory rate, sedation score, postoperative pain scores and side effects were assessed by a blinded observer. A patient-controlled analgesia system was used for postoperative pain relief. The quality of postoperative pain relief was assessed using Smiley's pain analogue scale. Results: Intraoperative haemodynamic responses did not differ between the groups. However, during emergence from general anaesthesia children in the clonidine group had significantly lower heart rates and blood pressures compared to children in the control group. In addition, heart rates and blood pressures were also lower in the clonidine group in the early postoperative period (P?< 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was significantly better in the clonidine group as evidenced by the total number of requests (3 vs 12, P< 0.05) and the total amount of tramadol (20.5 mg vs 72.8 mg, P < 0.05) administered. The duration of the caudal analgesia was significantly longer in the clonidine group (20.9±7.4 h vs 14.4±10.9 h, P< 0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that caudal clonidine 5 μg kg^-1 enhances and prolongs caudal blockade with bupivacaine 0.175% in children. It also blocks sympathoadrenergic responses during emergence from anaesthesia. Sedation and cardiovascular effects are observed up to 3 h into the postoperative period.     

Caudal neostigmine,bupivacaine, and their combination for postoperative pain management after hypospadias surgery in children

In a randomized, double-blinded study, we examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal neostigmine, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 60 children. After the induction of general anesthesia, children were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 20) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 mL/kg, with or without neostigmine 2 micro g/kg, or neostigmine 2 micro g/kg in normal saline 1 mL/kg. Intraoperatively, children receiving caudal bupivacaine or a bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture maintained hemodynamic stability, required less inhaled anesthetics, and had a shorter recovery time compared with the caudal neostigmine alone. Postoperatively, the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture resulted in superior analgesia compared with the other two groups. Recovery to first rescue analgesic times were (mean +/- SD) 22.8 +/- 2.9 h, 8.1 +/- 5.9 h, and 5.2 +/- 2.1 h in the bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, the bupivacaine and neostigmine groups received more doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine/neostigmine group to maintain adequate analgesia in the first 24 postoperative h. Postoperative vomiting occurred in 25%, 10%, and 30% in the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.01). We conclude that caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. Co-administration of the two drugs is associated with extended postoperative analgesia and reduced need for supplementary analgesics.     

Efficacy of three doses of ketamine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in pediatric inguinal herniotomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ketamine administered systemically is a potent analgesic at subanesthetic plasma concentrations. Addition of ketamine to bupivacaine for caudal epidural block significantly prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia. The purpose of this prospective, randomized double-blind study is to identify the optimal dose of ketamine that produces the maximum duration of caudal analgesia with minimal adverse effects as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for caudal epidural block. METHODS: Sixty children, aged 6 months to 10 years, undergoing inguinal herniotomy were allocated randomly to receive 1 of 3 solutions for caudal epidural block. Group 1 received 0.75 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with preservative-free ketamine 0.25 mg/kg, group 2 received 0.75 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, and group 3 received 0.75 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with ketamine 1 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed using the All India Institute of Medical Sciences pain discomfort scale. Rescue analgesia in the form of pethidine 1 mg/kg intramuscularly was administered when this score exceeded 4. RESULTS: The mean duration of caudal analgesia was 8.8 hours in group 1 compared with 22.1 hours in group 2 (P <.001) and 25.2 hours in group 3 (P <.001). Supplemental analgesia requirements with pethidine were significantly less in group 2 (4 subjects) and group 3 (no subject) when compared with group 1 (18 subjects). There were no differences between the groups in the incidence of motor blockade, urinary retention, emesis, or sedation. Group 3 had a significantly higher incidence of behavioral side effects such as odd behavior, agitation, or restlessness than groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal dose of ketamine in our study was 0.5 mg/kg added to 0.75 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% for caudal epidural block without an increase in side effects.     

Unilateral groin surgery in children: will the addition of an ultrasound‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block enhance the duration of analgesia of a single‐shot caudal block?

Background: Inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, and orchidopexy are commonly performed surgical procedures in children. Postoperative pain control is usually provided with a single‐shot caudal block. Blockade of the ilioinguinal nerve may lead to additional analgesia. The aim of this double‐blind, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvant blockade of the ilioinguinal nerve using ultrasound (US) guidance at the end of the procedure with local anesthetic vs normal saline and to explore the potential for prolongation of analgesia with decreased need for postoperative pain medication. Methods: Fifty children ages 1–6 years scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, orchidopexy, or orchiectomy were prospectively randomized into one of two groups: Group S that received an US‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block with 0.1 ml·kg^?1 of preservative‐free normal saline and Group B that received an US‐guided nerve block with 0.1 ml·kg^?1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine at the conclusion of the surgery. After induction of anesthesia but prior to surgical incision, all patients received caudal anesthesia with 0.7 ml·kg^?1 of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine. Patients were observed by a blinded observer for (i) pain scores using the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale, (ii) need for rescue medication in the PACU, (iii) need for oral pain medications given by the parents at home. Results: Forty‐eight patients, consisting of 46 males and two females, with a mean age of 3.98 (sd ± 1.88) were enrolled in the study. Two patients were excluded from the study because of study protocol violation and/or alteration in surgical procedure. The average pain scores reported for the entire duration spent in the recovery room for the caudal and caudal/ilioinguinal block groups were 1.92 (sd ± 1.59) and 1.18 (sd ± 1.31), respectively. The average pain score difference was 0.72 (sd ± 0.58) and was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, when examined by procedure type, it was found that the difference in the average pain scores between the caudal and caudal/ilioinguinal block groups was statistically significant for the inguinal hernia repair patients (P < 0.05) but not for the other groin surgery patients (P = 0.13). For all groin surgery patients, six of the 23 patients in the caudal group and eight of the 25 patients in the caudal/ilioinguinal block group required pain rescue medications throughout their entire hospital stay or at home (P = 0.76). Overall, the caudal group received an average of 0.54 (sd ± 1.14) pain rescue medication doses, while the caudal/ilioinguinal block group received an average of 0.77 (sd ± 1.70) pain rescue medication doses; this was, however, not statistically significant (P = 0.58). Conclusions: The addition of an US‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block to a single‐shot caudal block decreases the severity of pain experienced by pediatric groin surgery patients. The decrease in pain scores were particularly pronounced in inguinal hernia repair patients.     

S(+)-ketamine for caudal block in paediatric anaesthesia

We have evaluated the intra- and postoperative analgesic efficacy of preservative-free S(+)-ketamine compared with bupivacaine for caudal block in paediatric hernia repair. After induction of general anaesthesia, 49 children undergoing hernia repair were given a caudal injection (0.75 ml kg-1) of S(+)-ketamine 0.5 mg kg-1 (group K1), S(+)- ketamine 1.0 mg kg-1 (group K2) or 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (group B). No additional analgesic drugs were required during operation in any of the groups. Haemodynamic and respiratory variables remained stable during the observation period. Mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in groups B and K2 compared with group K1 (300 (SD 96) min and 273 (123) min vs 203 (117) min; P < 0.05). Groups B and K2 required less analgesics in the postoperative period compared with group K1 (30% and 33% vs 72%; P < 0.05). Postoperative sedation scores were comparable between the three groups. We conclude that S(+)-ketamine 1.0 mg kg-1 for caudal block in children produced surgical and postoperative analgesia equivalent to that of bupivacaine.      

Is penile block better than caudal epidural block for postcircumcision analgesia?

Purpose To compare caudal and penile block for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing circumcision with respect to efficacy, complication rates, and parental satisfaction.Methods The study population consisted of 100 ASA 1 and 2 boys aged 3 to 8 years who were undergoing circumcision for religious reasons. In all participants, inhalation anesthesia was administered with oxygen:nitrous oxide (1:2) and halothane. The participants were allocated randomly into two groups of 50 children each. Group 1 received penile block and Group 2 caudal block. The penile block was achieved by injecting bupivacaine into the two compartments of the subpubic space, with an additional ventral infiltration of a small volume of bupivacaine along the raphe of the penis. For caudal block, 1ml·kg^–1 body weight of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.Results Penile block shortened the induction-incision time and enabled earlier discharge home compared with caudal block. One patient undergoing penile block and nine patients undergoing caudal block vomited.Conclusions Penile and caudal block are equally effective for postcircumcision analgesia and neither is associated with serious complications. Anesthesiologist preference should be the deciding factor in choosing one technique over the other.     

Two in one: patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) to prevent erection and control pain in adult hypospadias-surgery patients.

Following penile surgery, erections are painful and may prejudice the result, because the sutures may not withstand a rigid erection. Therefore, prevention of erection and management of pain are extremely important following hypospadias repair, especially in adult patients. In this prospective study, we aimed to achieve these goals by using an epidural block with patient-controlled analgesia. We allocated 20 adult patients scheduled for hypospadias repair randomly either to receive or not to receive epidural analgesia. Postoperative pain was scored according to a standardised scoring system, based on a 10 point visual analogue scale. In group I (n = 10), analgesia was provided by a 3 ml h(-1) continuous infusion of fentanyl (2 microg) and bupivacaine solution (0.125%) in 1 ml saline via an epidural catheter for the first 3 days. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia was administered with an additional 5 ml of the same solution when the pain score was high (> 4). After 3 days, fentanyl was excluded from the treatment protocol, and analgesia was maintained with bupivacaine (0.125%). In group II (n = 10, control group), an epidural catheter was not inserted, and analgesia was maintained with pethidine (1 mg kg(-1)). Pain management was found to be more effective in group I. No erections occurred in group I, but the erection rate in group II was mean +/- s.d. = 1.7 +/- 0.2. The differences were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). We highly recommend the technique described here, which offers efficient analgesia and control of erection in adult hypospadias patients.     

Caudal bupivacaine and s(+)-ketamine for postoperative analgesia in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether caudal s-ketamine would prolong analgesia together with caudal bupivacaine. METHODS: Thirty children, ASA I-II, 1 month-9 years, scheduled for minor inguinal or penile surgery, were randomly assigned in a prospective, double-blind fashion to receive single shot caudal blockade by either bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml.kg(-1) (group B, n = 15) or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml.kg(-1) and preservative-free s-ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) (group K, n = 15). Postoperative pain was assessed by means of an observational 10-point scoring system and analgesia was administered if the pain score exceeded a value of 3. RESULTS: Within 24 h after caudal block 10 patients (67%) in group K and three patients in group B (20%) did not require additional analgesic medication (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for incidence of haemodynamic changes. We did not observe any negative side-effects attributable to the caudal block or s-ketamine. Conclusions: Addition of preservative-free s-ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) to caudal bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml.kg(-1) provides significant prolongation of analgesia without producing negative side-effects.     

The effects of femoral nerve blockade in conjunction with epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Either epidural analgesia or femoral nerve blockade improves analgesia and rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. No study has evaluated the combination of femoral nerve blockade and epidural analgesia. In this prospective, randomized, blinded study we investigated combining femoral nerve blockade with epidural analgesia. Forty-one patients received a single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.375% bupivacaine and 5 microg/mL epinephrine; 39 patients served as controls. All patients received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.06% bupivacaine and 10 microg/mL hydromorphone. Average duration of epidural analgesia was 2 days. All patients received the same standardized physical therapy intervention. Median visual analog scale (VAS) scores with physical therapy were significantly lower for 2 days among patients who received a femoral nerve block versus controls: 3 versus 4 (day 1), 2.5 versus 4 (day 2); P < 0.05. Median VAS pain scores at rest were 0 in both groups on days 1 and 2. Flexion range of motion was improved on postoperative day 2 (70 degrees versus 63 degrees ; P < 0.05). No peripheral neuropathies occurred. We conclude that the addition of femoral nerve blockade to epidural analgesia significantly improved analgesia for the first 2 days after total knee arthroplasty.     

Plasma bupivacaine concentrations during caudal analgesia and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in children

Plasma bupivacaine concentrations were measured in 27 children aged 3-7 years who received one of two analgesic regimens for herniotomy or orchidopexy. Analgesia was provided either by caudal epidural bupivacaine 0.2% 2 mg/kg (n = 14) or by ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% 1.25 mg/kg (n = 13). Mean (SD) peak venous bupivacaine concentrations were 0.57 (0.17) microgram/ml and 0.79 (0.38) microgram/ml respectively. Time to peak plasma concentrations were 29.6 (7.9) and 22.3 (10.9) minutes respectively. These concentrations are well below the potentially toxic level of 4.0 micrograms/ml, but suggest that uptake of bupivacaine is more rapid after ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block than during caudal analgesia.     

Caudal 0.2% ropivacaine is less effective during surgery than 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that without the analgesic effects of volatile anesthetics, caudal 0.20% ropivacaine would be less effective during surgical stimulation than 0.20% bupivacaine or 0.20% levobupivacaine. This trial was designed to examine whether the combination of a caudal block with 0.20% ropivacaine and i.v. anesthesia resulted in reduced analgesic efficacy during surgery compared with caudal 0.20% levobupivacaine or 0.20% bupivacaine in children. METHODS: Ninety ASA I-II children between 1 and 7 years old, scheduled for inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy under propofol anesthesia were randomized to receive a caudal block with 1 ml x kg(-1) of 0.2% bupivacaine, 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.2% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome measure of the study was the clinical efficacy of the caudal block during surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain relief and residual motor blockade. RESULTS: Four children were excluded and 86 were analyzed. The proportion of children with effective caudal block during surgery was significantly higher in children receiving levobupivacaine (26/28) or bupivacaine (27/29) compared with patients receiving ropivacaine (21/29) (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences among groups in the analgesic onset time (P = 0.1), incidence of residual motor blockade (P = 0.4), number of patients requiring analgesia after operation or in the time from caudal injection to the first administration of analgesic medication (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with propofol anesthesia, 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine are more effective than 0.2% ropivacaine for caudal use in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy.     

Efficacy of bupivacaine‐neostigmine and bupivacaine‐tramadol in caudal block in pediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy

Background: Limited duration of analgesia is among the limitations of single caudal injection with local anesthetics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bupivacaine in combination with either neostigmine or tramadol for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods: In a double‐blinded randomized trial, sixty children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy were enrolled to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml·kg^?1) with neostigmine (2 μg·kg^?1) (group BN) or tramadol (1 mg·kg^?1) (group BT). Hemodynamic variables, pain and sedation scores, additional analgesic requirements, and side effects were compared between two groups. Results: Duration of analgesia was longer in group BT (17.30 ± 8.24 h) compared with group BN (13.98 ± 10.03 h) (P = 0.03). Total consumption of rescue analgesic was significantly lower in group BT compared with group BN (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation between groups. Adverse effects excluding the vomiting were not observed in any patients. Conclusion: In conclusion, tramadol (1 mg·kg^?1) compared with neostigmine (2 μg·kg^?1) might provide both prolonged duration of analgesia and extended time to first analgesic in caudal block.     

Effects of intrathecal fentanyl on quality of spinal anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair

Background: The effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of spinal anesthesia has not been investigated in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction is decreased by addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia. Methods: Children (6–14 years) were randomized into two groups. Group F (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.2 μg·kg⁻¹ of fentanyl. Group P (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.9% NaCl (placebo). The dose of bupivacaine was 0.4 mg·kg⁻¹. The primary variable was the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction. Spinal block characteristics, duration of spinal anesthesia assessed by recovery of hip flexion and duration of analgesia were the secondary variables measured, and the side effects were noted. Results: There were significant differences in incidence of pain and pain scores during sac traction with lower incidence and scores in the fentanyl group (P = 0.009). Two groups were similar regarding the level of sensory block during sac traction and duration of spinal anesthesia. Duration of spinal analgesia was prolonged significantly in the fentanyl group (P = 0.025). Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl at a dose of 0.2 μg·kg⁻¹ added to bupivacaine significantly improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia and prolongs postoperative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia.     

Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia versus combined spinal/thoracic epidural analgesia on pain, pulmonary function and the metabolic response following colonic resection

Background: The neuroendocrine response following major surgery has not been previously influenced by either regional anaesthetic techniques or opioid analgesia probably due to insufficient intraoperative afferent neural blockade. In this study we attempted to determine whether significant inhibition of these pathways could be achieved by combining preoperative high spinal anaesthesia with postoperative thoracic epidural anaesthesia. In theory too, there may be additional benefits over perioperative thoracic epidural anaesthesia on pain and pulmonary dysfunction. Methods: 20 ASA 1–3 patients undergoing elective colonic surgery were studied. Gp 1 (n=10) received a high spinal intraoperative block to T4 using 6mls of 0.5% bupivacaine plus continuous epidural 0.125% bupivacaine/0.0025% diamorphine. Gp 2 (n=10) patients received epidural 0.5% bupivacaine block to T4 plus continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine/0.0025% diamorphine. We measured a) plasma glucose and Cortisol at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 h; b) forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and peak flow rate (PFR) preoperatively, at 8 and 24 h; c) visual analogue pain scores (VAS 0–10) at rest, cough and mobilisation at 8 and 24 h; d) block height every hour for 12 hours then 3 hourly; e) 24-hour urine volumes for dopamine, adrenaline and noradrenaline f) 24-hour PCA morphine requirements. Results: The two groups did not differ in age, sex, height, weight, duration of surgery, blood loss or serum albumin. Pain relief was excellent and similar in both groups. The average 24 hour morphine consumption was 10 mg in both groups with no differences in the block height. All the patients had a 30–50% reduction in FEV1, FVC and PFR (P>0.05). Metabolically, there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups except a higher rise in glucose in Gpl at 2 and 3 h (P=0.0312 and 0.014). 24-hour catecholamine studies showed no differences for noradrenaline (P=0.8), adrenaline (P=0.47) and dopamine (P=0.36). Conclusions: Thoracic epidural bupivacaine/diamorphine infusion provided excellent postoperative analgesia following colonic surgery. An intraoperative combined spinal/epidural technique conferred no additional benefit on analgesia, pulmonary function and the neuroendocrine response.     

Comparative study of continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block and lumbar epidural morphine in post-thoracotomy pain

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% in 1:200 000 epinephrine and continuous lumbar epidural block with morphine in controlling post-thoracotomy pain and to measure serum bupivacaine concentrations during extrapleural infusion.

Design

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting

St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ont., a tertiary care teaching centre.

Patients

Sixty-one patients booked for elective thoracotomy were randomized by sealed envelope to two groups.

Interventions

Group A received a continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% in 1:200 000 epinephrine as a bolus of 0.3 mL/kg followed by an infusion of 0.1 mL/kg every hour for 72 hours. Group B received a continuous lumbar epidural block with morphine as a bolus of 70 g/kg followed by an infusion of 7 g/kg every hour for 72 hours.

Main outcome measures

Pain was assessed by a linear visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. The cumulative amount of “rescue” intravenous morphine used, and serum bupivacaine concentrations were measured as secondary outcomes.

Results

Pain control was the same in both groups as assessed by linear VAS score (p = 0.33). The cumulative dose of intravenous morphine for supplemental analgesia was statistically significant between the groups: group A patients used more morphine than group B (p < 0.05). Accumulation of serum bupivacaine was present with no clinical toxicity.

Conclusions

There is no significant difference in the degree of post-thoracotomy pain control measured by the VAS score when analgesia is provided by continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% in 1:200 000 epinephrine or lumbar epidural block with morphine. Larger amounts of rescue analgesia were used by patients in the continuous extrapleural group with bupivacaine than those in the continuous lumbar epidural block with morphine. Serum bupivacaine concentrations rise without clinical toxicity.     

Levobupivacaine–tramadol combination for caudal block in children: a randomized,double‐blinded,prospective study1

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and duration of analgesia after caudal levobupivacaine 0.125% or caudal tramadol 1.5 mg·kg⁻¹ and mixture of both in children undergoing day‐case surgery. Methods: Sixty‐three American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II children between 1 and 7 years old scheduled for inguinal hernia repair under sevoflurane anesthesia were randomized to receive caudal levobupivacaine 0.125% (group L), caudal tramadol 1.5 mg·kg⁻¹ (group T) or mixture of both (group LT) (total volume of caudal solution was 1 ml·kg⁻¹). Duration of analgesia and requirement for additional analgesics were noted. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the Children’s and Infants’ Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) every 15 min for the first hour, and after 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. Analgesia was supplemented whenever pain score was ≥4. Results: No patient experienced significant intraoperative hemodynamic response to surgical incision. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group LT than in group L and group T (545 ± 160 min vs 322 ± 183 min and 248 ± 188 min, respectively) (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the group L and group T for duration of analgesia (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences among the groups in the number of patients requiring analgesia after operation (P = 0.7). No signs of motor block were observed after the first postoperative hour in any of the patients. Conclusion: Addition of tramadol increased the duration of analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine in children.     

The comparison of caudal ketamine,alfentanil and ketamine plus alfentanil administration for postoperative analgesia in children

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the effect of single dose caudal ketamine, alfentanil or a mixture of both drugs in the treatment of pain after hypospadias repair surgery in children. METHODS: The group comprised 109 boys, ASA I-II, aged 1-9 years, who were undergoing hypospadias repair surgery as day cases. The children were randomly divided into three groups for postoperative analgesia: group 1, only alfentanil (20 microg x kg(-10) was given caudally; group 2, ketamine (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) alone; and group 3, alfentanil (20 microg x kg(-1))-ketamine (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) was given caudally. The analgesic effect of caudal block was evaluated using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and sedation was assessed using a five-point sedation score. The first analgesic requirement time and the number of supplementary analgesics required by each child in a 24-h period were also recorded. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found in demographic characteristics, haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, objective pain scores, postoperative sedation scores and duration of surgery among the groups. The median time to first analgesia was significantly shorter in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (P=0.009, P=0.001). Significantly more patients in group 1 required additional postoperative analgesia (paracetamol 15 mg x kg(-1)) compared with groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Caudal administration of ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 with or without alfentanil in children produced satisfactory postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression or other side-effects.     

Adequacy of caudal analgesia in children after penoscrotal and inguinal surgery using 0.5 or 1.0 ml·kg−1 bupivacaine 0.125%

To determine the optimal volume of bupivacaine 0.125% for postoperative caudal analgesia, we compared the effectiveness of 0.5 ml·kg^?1 and 1 ml·kg^?1 of bupivacaine 0.125% with 1:200,000 epinephrine in 80 children undergoing penoscrotal and inguinal surgery. The adequacy of caudal analgesia and supplemental analgesic requirements did not differ between the two groups at any time during the first 12 hr after surgery. We conclude that 0.5 ml·kg^?1 of bupivacaine 0.125% with 1:200,000 epinephrine is as effective as 1 ml·kg^?1 of the same solution and recommend its use for penoscrotal surgery. The evidence for ss of 0.5 ml·kg^?1 of bupivacaine 0.125% for inguinal owever, is inconclusive because of an insufficient patients studied.