Utility of a rapid latex test for the detection of Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens

Currently, the method of choice for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease is the detection of cytotoxin in stool filtrates by tissue culture. Since many hospital laboratories do not have tissue culture facilities, there is a need for a rapid test which is both sensitive and specific to diagnose C. difficile disease. A commercial latex agglutination was compared with the conventional cytotoxin tissue culture assay for the detection of C. difficile or its toxin(s) in fecal specimens. Of the 574 specimens evaluated, 111 were cytotoxin positive while 97 were positive by the latex agglutination test. There were 17 specimens positive by latex agglutination but negative by tissue culture assay. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the CDT latex test was 86.1 percent and 95.3 percent respectively. This rapid latex test can serve as an excellent screening procedure for the presence of C. difficile. Those specimens positive by the latex test should be further evaluated for the presence of cytotoxin by tissue culture.     

Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A and its use in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease.

A rapid (2.5 h) direct enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for Clostridium difficile toxin A was developed for clinical use. Specimen centrifugation and filtration were not required. The EIA detected toxin A levels in patient stool as low as 20 pg (2 ng/ml of stool). The test was 5,000 times more sensitive for toxin A than it was for toxin B and did not react with a panel of other bacterial species with the exception of one highly toxigenic strain of Clostridium sordellii. The EIA was compared with the cytotoxin assay, culture of toxigenic C. difficile (toxigenic culture), and latex agglutination by using 313 fresh stool specimens submitted from patients with suspected C. difficile-associated disease. Results read visually and with a plate reader were similar. Sixty-two specimens were positive by one or more tests, but only 22 (35%) were positive by all four laboratory methods. The EIA was 84.1% sensitive and 98.9% specific when it was compared with the cytotoxin assay. The use of toxigenic culture to referee discrepant results (EIA versus cytotoxin assay) showed the EIA sensitivity and specificity to be 95.1 and 99.3%, respectively, with respect to other laboratory methods. Patient charts were reviewed for antibiotic-associated diarrhea on 108 specimens, including all those that were positive by at least one test method. Of 34 patients determined to have C. difficile-associated disease, 29 (85.3%) were positive by EIA, 32 (94.1%) were positive by the cytotoxin assay, 27 (79.4%) were positive by toxigenic culture, and 20 (58.8%) were positive by latex agglutination. Seven patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea had a positive latex result, but results were negative by EIA, the cytotoxin assay, and toxigenic culture. The EIA demonstrated high specificity and good sensitivity for C. difficile-associated disease cases. The test can be used alone or in combination with the cytotoxin assay or toxigenic culture to provide rapid and sensitive results.     

Multicenter evaluation of four methods for Clostridium difficile detection: ImmunoCard C. difficile, cytotoxin assay, culture, and latex agglutination.

A three-center study was undertaken to compare several test methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile, associated toxin, or related markers by using 927 stool specimens. Methods included direct assay of cytotoxin in stool by tissue culture, C. difficile bacterial culture followed by cytotoxin assay, bacterial culture alone, latex agglutination assay, and the ImmunoCard C. difficile test (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc.). The sensitivities, as determined against direct cytotoxin assay results, of the ImmunoCard C. difficile and latex agglutination assays were 84 and 67%, respectively (92 and 77%, respectively, when adjusted for bacterial culture outcomes). Evaluation for C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) among 864 patients was based on clinical criteria for antibiotic-associated diarrhea combined with laboratory evidence of toxin or toxin-producing C. difficile in stool specimens. The sensitivity of each test method for screening of CDAD was as follows: bacterial culture, 95%; culture with cytotoxin assay of isolates, 90%; ImmunoCard C. difficile test, 83%; cytotoxin assay 82%; and latex agglutination assay, 67% (P < or = 0.05 versus all other methods). The standard deviations of the test sensitivity statistics between study sites were ranked as follows: cytotoxin assay (+/- 3.1%) < ImmunoCard C. difficile test (+/- 5.7%) < latex agglutination assay (+/- 12.3%) < culture (+/- 24.7%) < culture with cytotoxin assay (+/- 28.0%). The data support the use of the ImmunoCard C. difficile test as an adjunct for the diagnosis of CDAD.     

Comparison of a dot immunobinding assay, latex agglutination, and cytotoxin assay for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

C. diff-CUBE, a dot immunobinding assay (DIA) (Difco Laboratories, Ann Arbor, Mich.) for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A in stool specimens, was compared with latex agglutination (LA) (Marion Laboratories, Kansas City, Mo.) and cytotoxin assay (CTA) for the laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. A total of 200 stool specimens collected from 169 patients with suspected C. difficile diarrhea were tested. Of the 198 specimens evaluated by all three methods, 36 (18%) from 36 patients were positive by one or more of the tests. Twenty-five, 26, and 23 specimens were positive by CTA, DIA, and LA, respectively; 14 were positive by all three methods. Eight specimens yielded nonspecific LA test results; all eight were negative by CTA, and one was positive by DIA. DIA results agreed with CTA results in 183 (92%) cases and with LA results in 175 (88%) cases. CTA and LA results agreed in 179 (90%) cases. Freezing of the specimen did not appear to adversely affect either the DIA or LA test. These preliminary results suggest that C. diff-CUBE may be useful as a rapid screen for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. However, for optimum laboratory diagnosis, further testing of all stools that are negative by DIA is warranted.     

An evaluation of a rapid latex test for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

We present here the results of an evaluation of a rapid latex test for detection of Cl. stridium difficile-associated in comparison with our standard cytotoxin assay and culture for C. difficile. Some 515 diarrheal stools were examined. C. difficile was cultured from 70 specimens (13.5%); 53 specimens (10.2%) were positive with the latex test, and 50 (9.6%) by cytotoxin assay. The latex test did not differ significantly from the cytotoxin assay in sensitivity or specificity compared to culture results. There was also no significant difference in the specificity of the latex test compared to cytotoxin assay in patients in whom the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea was negative. Positive and negative predictive values of the latex test for C. difficile-associated diarrhea were similar to those of cytotoxin assay. The latex test thus appears to be a rapid and practical test for the laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. To optimize specificity and sensitivity its use should be restricted to patients where the diagnosis is strongly suspected and a rapid answer is required. As it does not distinguish between toxigenic virulent C. difficile strains and non-toxigenic avirulent strains, it would seem prudent to confirm positive results subsequently by demonstrating in-vivo or in-vitro cytotoxin production.     

Evaluation of four methods for rapid detection of adenovirus

Four methods for rapid detection of adenovirus were evaluated by testing retrospectively 28 frozen clinical specimens from which an adenovirus strain had been isolated. After thawing all specimens were retested for the presence of adenovirus by conventional culture on KB cells and found to be positive. The four tests used for rapid detection of adenovirus were a 48-hour culture technique, and an immunoassay, a latex agglutination test and an immunofluorescence assay for direct detection of viral antigen using commercially available reagents. Of the 28 specimens all were positive in the 48-hour culture, 25 (89 %) positive in the immunoassay and 10 (36 %) positive in the latex agglutination test. Six of eight nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were positive in the immunofluorescence assay. Twenty-five clinical specimens negative for adenovirus on conventional culture were also negative in the 48-hour culture technique. Overall, the rapid (48-hour) culture technique was 100 % sensitive and 100 % specific compared to conventional culture. The direct detection of viral antigen by immunoassay was less sensitive, however results were available within a few hours. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to determine whether these rapid techniques could replace conventional culture in the routine diagnosis of adenovirus infection.     

Latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool samples

A total of 163 stool specimens were tested for detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxin by cytotoxicity assay with tissue culture, latex agglutination test, and isolation of the organism. From 33 specimens which were positive for toxin by cytotoxicity, 30 were positive by the latex agglutination test; the organism was isolated from 21. The total number of samples which were positive with the latex agglutination test was 44. The predictive value of a positive latex agglutination result relative to the cytotoxicity test was 68%, and the predictive value of a negative result was 97.5%. The specificity and sensitivity of the latex agglutination test relative to the cytotoxicity assay and the low cost and simple facilities required indicate that the latex agglutination test is a useful procedure for screening for C. difficile toxins, provided that positive latex results are confirmed by cytotoxicity assay.     

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) in clinical specimens. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test

A new latex test, Culturette Brand Rapid Latex Test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A, was tested on 408 stool samples. In 247 frozen tissue culture supernate specimens previously obtained from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CAD), the latex test (enterotoxin) was positive in 182 (74%) as compared with 194 (79%) for the repeat tissue culture (P greater than 0.1) cytotoxin (toxin B) test. Testing of 161 fresh stool samples found the latex test superior to tissue culture (P less than 0.05) in cases of CAD (90% positivity vs. 70%), with the two tests being equal in both non-CAD diarrheal and non-diarrheal control groups. In vitro evaluation of 61 C. difficile isolates found all (100%) to be producers of enterotoxin A, while only 53 (87%) produced toxin B. The latex test for C. difficile toxin detection is a rapid, simple test for use in the diagnosis in CAD.     

Evaluation of the latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile.

We compared two Clostridium difficile latex agglutination tests, Meritec from Meridian Diagnostic (Cincinnati, Ohio) and CDT from Becton-Dickinson (Cockeysville, Md), on 289 specimens submitted for tissue culture cytotoxicity using MRC-5 cells. When compared with CDT, the Meritec latex agglutination test had a sensitivity of 90% (26/29), a specificity of 97% (251/260), and a correlation of 96%. Meritec was compared with tissue culture cytotoxicity on 357 specimens. Meritec had a sensitivity of 77% (30/39), a specificity of 93% (298/318), and a correlation of 92%. Clinical review of 10 Meritec +/- tissue culture cytotoxicity minus patients revealed one likely, two probable, and seven doubtful cases of C difficile disease. In contrast, review of 10 Meritec +/- tissue culture cytotoxicity plus patients showed seven likely and three probable cases of C difficile disease. The Meritec is comparable with the CDT latex agglutination test, but is not nearly as sensitive as either tissue culture assay or culture for detection of C difficile disease. A positive latex agglutination test should be confirmed by a tissue culture cytotoxicity assay.     

Outpatient evaluation of a rapid, direct test for detection of group A streptococci in throat swabs

A latex agglutination test (Marion Laboratories) was compared with standard culture methods for the detection of Group A streptococci in two studies of 500 throat swabs each. Swabs were first inoculated to sheep blood agar and then tested for Group A streptococcal antigen. The direct test performed with nearly identical sensitivity and specificity in the two phases of the study. Overall, Group A streptococci were isolated from 91 specimens, and 81 (89%) of these were detected by the direct latex test. The predictive value positive for the latex test was 90%, and the accuracy was 98%. The sensitivity of the latex test for detection of specimens having ten or more colonies of Group A streptococci was 95%. Non-Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci were isolated from 65 specimens, and all of these specimens had negative latex tests. The authors' findings suggest that this direct latex agglutination test is a reliable screening method for rapid detection of Group A streptococci in outpatient throat specimens.     

Evaluation of Bactigen latex agglutination and Phadebact coagglutination for detection of bacterial antigens in cerebrospinal fluid.

The Bactigen latex agglutination and Phadebact coagglutination tests were evaluated for their ability to detect bacterial antigens of Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae (83 serotypes) and Neisseria meningitidis groups A, B, C, and Y in 214 samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Bactigen latex agglutination was more sensitive than Phadebact coagglutination: it detected 87% (59/68) of culture positive CSF specimens, whereas Phadebact detected 72% (52/72). Bactigen detected all cases of meningitis caused by S pneumoniae and H influenzae. Of the 19 specimens that were positive for N meningitidis, 74% were detected by Phadebact and only 53% by Bactigen. Gram stain results were positive for 85% of all specimens positive on culture. Bactigen was slightly more specific (97%) than Phadebact (96%). Bactigen, however, showed less specificity (81%) than Phadebact (94%) on 31 CSF specimens that were culture positive for organisms other than the test organisms. These included two CSF specimens from patients with tuberculous meningitis which gave false positive results for S pneumoniae with the Bactigen reagents. No false positive results were obtained on 104 culture negative CSF samples. Bactigen latex agglutination was superior to Phadebact coagglutination and Gram stain for the detection of S pneumoniae and H influenzae in CSF specimens from patients with bacteriologically proved meningitis.     

Assessment of rapid methods of pneumococcal antigen detection in routine sputum bacteriology.

Sputum specimens from 480 patients were examined for the presence of pneumococci by Gram film and culture and for pneumococcal antigen by counterimmunoelectrophoresis, coagglutination, and latex agglutination. Ninety six positive specimens were detected. Gram film and culture provided the most reliable techniques in well taken specimens collected early in the illness before antibiotic treatment had started. More than 70% of the specimens examined were submitted after starting antibiotics, however, and in these specimens, methods of antigen detection proved of greater value than either Gram film or culture. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis, coagglutination, and latex agglutination were similar in sensitivity and specificity, but coagglutination and latex agglutination were much easier to perform and to read.     

Rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea using a latex agglutination test

A rapid latex agglutination test, Culturette Brand CDT from Marion Laboratories, was evaluated and compared to a tissue culture assay (TCA) and isolation of Clostridium difficile in 380 faecal specimens from 226 patients with clinically suspected Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. The sensitivity and specificity of the latex test compared with the TCA were 83% and 80% respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 55% and 94% respectively. In patients with repeated sampling the sensitivity increased to 95%. The latex test may be useful as a screening test for negative specimens in laboratories where TCA is not available, but positive specimens have to be confirmed by TCA.     

Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C. difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests.

The VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay (CDA) is a new, automated, enzyme-linked fluorescent-antibody assay for detection of C. difficile toxin A antigen in stool specimens. Simultaneous, parallel testing was performed by using the VIDAS CDA, the Culturette brand CDT latex test for C. difficile antigens, and conventional laboratory cell culture tests for C. difficile, cytotoxicity and C. difficile culture. One hundred ninety-four consecutive fresh soft or liquid stool samples submitted for C. difficile testing between July and September 1990 were evaluated. Of the 194 samples tested, 19 (10%) were from 16 patients who met our case definition for C. difficile-associated disease. The in vitro tests were evaluated in relation to two forms of a clinical case definition. In one form, a positive culture for toxin-producing C. difficile or a positive cytotoxin result obtained directly from the stool specimen was required as laboratory evidence of C. difficile. In the other, a positive result of any of the four laboratory tests was accepted for the laboratory portion of the case definition. No significant difference between the sensitivity of the VIDAS CDA and that of the Culturette brand CDT latex test was found (48 to 58% sensitivity for the CDT latex test and 52 to 63% sensitivity for the VIDAS CDA compared with 93 to 100% sensitivity for culture and 70 to 100% sensitivity for cytotoxin testing). The performance of the VIDAS CDA, however, was hampered by a high percentage of tests (19%) which gave an uninterpretable result.     

Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for Clostridium difficile in two nursing home outbreaks.

The Culturette Brand Clostridium difficile test (CDT; Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.) is a latex agglutination test for C. difficile. The recent controversy involving the identity of antigens detected by CDT has made decisions on its use difficult. We compared the test results with those of selective culture and stool cytotoxin assays in investigations of two nursing home outbreaks of C. difficile-associated disease in order to formulate usage recommendations. Selective culture for C. difficile identified 27 (19%) of 142 subjects as carriers. CDT and the stool cytotoxin assay identified only 52 and 48% of these carriers, respectively. Compared with the stool cytotoxin assay, CDT had a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (89%) for the detection of C. difficile disease, but the positive predictive value of the test was only 17% when the prevalence of disease was 2%. We conclude that the CDT should not be used to identify carriers but that it is a sufficiently sensitive and specific screening test for diagnosing C. difficile disease. However, since the positive predictive value of the CDT is low when the prevalence of disease is low, positive test results should be confirmed by the stool cytotoxin assay.     

Evaluation of three commercially available rotavirus detection methods for neonatal specimens

Commercially available assay kits have now made detection of rotavirus in stool specimens possible as a routine laboratory test. One such kit, Rotazyme II (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) has been reported to give a higher incidence of false positive results with neonatal stool than with stool from older patients. One hundred stool specimens from asymptomatic neonates (age range, two to five days) were tested by two ELISA methods and one latex agglutination method in order to evaluate the rate of false positivity in this group of patients. Negative staining electron microscopy was used as the reference method. The two ELISA methods were Rotazyme II and Rotavirus EIA (International Diagnostic Laboratories, St. Louis, MO), and the latex agglutination method was Meritec-Rotavirus (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). The Rotavirus EIA and Meritec-Rotavirus tests gave 0% and 1% false positive results, respectively, while the Rotazyme II test gave a 4% false positive rate with an additional 19% equivocal results. This extensive comparative analysis of commercially available assays for detection of rotavirus in neonatal stool specimens suggests a false positive or equivocal rate with the Rotazyme II test that impairs clinical utility.     

Monoclonal antibody-based rapid identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei in blood culture fluid from patients with community-acquired septicaemia

A monoclonal antibody-based latex agglutination (MAb-LA) test was employed for the rapid identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei in blood culture fluid from patients with community-acquired septicaemia. These patients were admitted to 12 hospitals in the northeastern part of Thailand which is a region known to be endemic for melioidosis. Blood samples were collected and immediately added to the blood culture bottles which were incubated in either automated (five hospitals) or manual (seven hospitals) culture systems. Of a total of 1369 culture-positive specimens, 204 specimens were culture-positive for B. pseudomallei. Of those, 194 (95%) were positive by MAb-LA and the type of blood culture system did not affect positivity rates. The performance of the MAb-LA test on these specimens was highly satisfactory compared with culture detection and confirmation by biochemical test, with 95.1% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity and 98.8% and 99.2% for positive and negative predictive values, respectively. The method described is highly reproducible, simple to perform even by inexperienced laboratory personnel and does not require expensive or elaborate equipment.     

Latex agglutination test for adenovirus diagnosis in diarrheal disease

A commercial latex agglutination test for diagnosis of adenovirus in diarrheal disease (Adenolex, Orion Diagnostica, Finland) was evaluated by comparison with the results obtained by ELISA, electron microscopy (EM), and virus isolation. Fifty specimens originated from the diagnostic routine, and 50 were selected from a previous epidemiological study on the etiology of diarrheal disease in children. Thirteen of the 100 specimens reacted with the latex control, impairing interpretation of the results. Although the ELISA detected adenovirus antigen in 10(2) higher dilutions than the latex agglutination test, a total agreement was obtained between results by the two tests for 87 specimens including 42 positives. The two additional positives found by EM and virus isolation could not be diagnosed by the latex agglutination test. Of 37 specimens containing enteric adenoviruses (types 40 and 41), the agglutination test diagnosed all but 4 specimens containing type 41 virus. These four specimens were negative also by ELISA and adenovirus had been detected by virus isolation on the 293 cell line. The latex agglutination test gave positive results with nine specimens containing adenovirus types other than the enteric types 40 and 41. The latex agglutination test was found to be a rapid and simple method for the detection of adenovirus in diarrheal disease. Compared to ELISA and EM, the sensitivity was 100% and 95% respectively, and the specificity 100%.     

Evaluation of methods for detection of toxins in specimens of feces submitted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

Clostridium difficile is the principal pathogen associated with hospital-acquired acute diarrheal disease. We have evaluated the performances of six approaches for diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). Consecutive stool specimens (n = 200) from 133 patients were examined by cytotoxin assay, by culture of C. difficile on cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar, and by toxin detection using four rapid immunoassay systems (Oxoid Toxin A test, ImmunoCard Toxin A test, TechLab Tox A/B II test, and Premier Toxins A&B test). A diagnosis of CDAD was established for 35 (27%) patients (representing 29% of specimens). The adjusted sensitivity and specificity of the methods were, respectively, 98 and 99% for the cytotoxin assay, 54 and 99% for ImmunoCard, 50 and 98% for Oxoid, 79 and 98% for TechLab, 80 and 98% for Premier, and 57 and 100% for culture. The TechLab and Premier assays are acceptable tests for diagnosis of CDAD but are not equivalent to the cytotoxin assay.     

Use of the Pastorex aspergillus antigen latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.

AIMS--To evaluate the Pastorex aspergillus antigen latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients undergoing liver or bone marrow transplantation. METHODS--Serum samples were taken at least twice weekly post-transplant and tested for Aspergillus antigen. Latex agglutination test results were compared with microbiological examination of respiratory, urine and bile specimens. Serum samples from liver transplant patients were also tested for antibodies to Aspergillus fumigatus by counter immunoelectrophoresis. RESULTS--Eight of the 91 patients studied developed invasive aspergillosis. Positive latex agglutination tests were obtained in eight of 187 (4.3%) serum samples from four of these eight patients. The other four patients with invasive aspergillosis gave consistently negative latex agglutination tests. A positive latex agglutination test was the first indication of invasive aspergillosis in two patients; these patients were already on amphotericin B. Positive latex agglutination tests were the only evidence of invasive aspergillosis in one patient who subsequently died of the infection. False positive latex agglutination tests were obtained in five of 83 (6%) patients with no evidence of invasive aspergillosis and misleading positive cultures seen in nine of 83 (10.8%). No antibodies were detected in three of four liver transplant patients with invasive aspergillosis. Conversely, antibodies were detected in 63 of 262 (24%) serum samples from 43 liver transplant patients with no evidence of invasive aspergillosis; one of these patients had an antibody titre of 1:2 on four separate occasions. CONCLUSIONS--The Pastorex aspergillus antigen latex agglutination test, when used alone, lacks sensitivity and specificity for the early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. A diagnosis was made in all patients with invasive aspergillosis when both culture and antigen tests were performed although using these criteria a false positive diagnosis would have been made in 13 of 83 (15.6%) patients. Microbiological and serial serological investigations for antigen should both be performed and the results considered in conjunction with radiological and clinical evidence.